XML 25 R9.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.6.0.2
GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2016
Goodwill and Intangible Assets Disclosure [Abstract]  
GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS
GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS
Goodwill was allocated to each segment based on the relative fair value at November 30, 2016. The change in the carrying amount of goodwill is as follows (in thousands):

 
NAST
 
Global Forwarding
 
Robinson Fresh
 
All Other and Corporate
 
Total
December 31, 2014 balance
 
$
607,156

 
$
106,443

 
$
93,398

 
$
18,041

 
$
825,038

Acquisitions
 
211,369

 
37,056

 
32,515

 
6,280

 
287,220

Translation
 
(2,886
)
 
(506
)
 
(444
)
 
(85
)
 
(3,921
)
December 31, 2015 balance
 
815,639

 
142,993

 
125,469

 
24,236

 
1,108,337

Acquisitions
 
97,727

 
17,133

 
15,033

 
2,904

 
132,797

Translation
 
(6,136
)
 
(1,076
)
 
(944
)
 
(182
)
 
(8,338
)
December 31, 2016 balance
 
$
907,230

 
$
159,050

 
$
139,558

 
$
26,958

 
$
1,232,796


We allocate goodwill to reporting units based on the reporting unit expected to benefit from the business combination. We evaluate our reporting units on a continual basis and, if necessary, reassign goodwill using a relative fair value allocation approach. Goodwill is tested for impairment at the reporting unit level on an annual basis and between annual tests if an event occurs or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying value. These events or circumstances could include a significant change in the business climate, legal factors, operating performance indicators, competition, or sale or disposition of a significant portion of a reporting unit.
During the quarter ended December 31, 2016, due to the reorganization of our reporting structure, we concluded that we had seven reporting units. As a result of this change in reporting units, we allocated goodwill to our reporting units based on each reporting unit’s fair value using a discounted cash flow analysis and market approach. Additionally at this time, we changed our annual quantitative goodwill impairment testing date from December 31 to November 30 of each year. The change in the goodwill impairment test date better aligns the impairment testing procedures with the timing of our long-term planning process, which is a significant input to the testing. We performed a goodwill impairment assessment both prior to and after the change in reporting units at November 30.  This change in testing date did not delay, accelerate, or avoid a goodwill impairment charge.
Goodwill is tested at least annually for impairment and is tested for impairment more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that the asset might be impaired. The impairment test is performed using a two-step process. In the first step, the fair value of each reporting unit is compared with the carrying amount of the reporting unit, including goodwill. If the estimated fair value is less than the carrying amount of the reporting unit, there is an indication that goodwill impairment exists, and a second step must be completed in order to determine the amount of the goodwill impairment, if any, that should be recorded. In the second step, an impairment loss is recognized for any excess of the carrying amount of the reporting unit’s goodwill over the implied fair value of that goodwill. The implied fair value of goodwill is determined by allocating the fair value of the reporting unit in a manner similar to a purchase price allocation.
The fair value of each reporting unit is determined using a discounted cash flow analysis and market approach. Projecting discounted future cash flows requires us to make significant estimates regarding future revenues and expenses, projected capital expenditures, changes in working capital and the appropriate discount rate. Use of the market approach consists of comparisons to comparable publicly-traded companies that are similar in size and industry. Actual results may differ from those used in our valuations.
Based on our step one goodwill impairment analysis, no impairments of goodwill were deemed to have occurred, and the fair value of all of reporting units was in excess of their carrying value. No events occurred from November 30, 2016 to December 31, 2016, to indicate any changes to our impairment conclusions at November 30, 2016.
Identifiable intangible assets consisted of the following at December 31 (in thousands): 
 
2016
 
2015
 
Cost
 
Accumulated Amortization
 
Net
 
Cost
 
Accumulated Amortization
 
Net
Finite-lived intangibles
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Customer relationships
$
244,036

 
$
(87,199
)
 
$
156,837

 
$
170,472

 
$
(61,050
)
 
$
109,422

Non-competition agreements
500

 
(287
)
 
213

 
550

 
(227
)
 
323

Vendor lists

 

 

 
150

 
(128
)
 
22

Total finite-lived intangibles
244,536

 
(87,486
)
 
157,050

 
171,172

 
(61,405
)
 
109,767

Indefinite-lived intangibles
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Trademarks
10,475

 

 
10,475

 
10,475

 

 
10,475

Total intangibles
$
255,011

 
$
(87,486
)
 
$
167,525

 
$
181,647

 
$
(61,405
)
 
$
120,242



Amortization expense for other intangible assets was (in thousands): 
2016
$
27,053

2015
24,373

2014
18,748


Definite-lived intangible assets, by reportable segment, as of December 31, 2016, will be amortized over their remaining lives as follows (in thousands):
 
NAST
 
Global Forwarding
 
Robinson Fresh
 
All Other and Corporate
 
Total
2017
$
7,560

 
$
26,873

 
$

 
$
490

 
$
34,923

2018
7,560

 
26,840

 

 

 
34,400

2019
7,560

 
26,840

 

 

 
34,400

2020

 
24,136

 

 

 
24,136

2021

 
10,615

 

 

 
10,615

Thereafter

 
18,576

 

 

 
18,576

Total

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
$
157,050