XML 46 R2.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.23.1
Pay vs Performance Disclosure
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2022
USD ($)
Dec. 31, 2021
USD ($)
Dec. 31, 2020
USD ($)
Pay vs Performance Disclosure [Table]      
Pay vs Performance [Table Text Block]
Pay for Performance
In accordance with SEC rules adopted in 2022, pursuant to the Dodd-Frank Act, we are providing the following disclosure regarding executive compensation and Company performance for the fiscal years listed below. The compensation information presented in this table is intended to be provided in accordance with SEC rules, and may be different from the compensation information presented in “Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Compensation Discussion and Analysis: In Detail” beginning on page 56.
Pay Versus Performance
Year
Summary
Compensation
Table Total
for PEO
(1)
($)
Compensation
Actually Paid
to PEO
(1)(2)(3)
($)
Average
Summary
Compensation
Table Total
for Non-PEO
Named
Executive
Officers
(1)
($)
Average
Compensation
Actually Paid
to Non-PEO
Named
Executive
Officers
(1)(2)(4)
($)
Value of Initial Fixed $100
Investment Based on:
Net
Income
(6)
($, in
millions)
Adjusted
EBITDA
(7)
($, in
millions)
Total
Shareholder
Return
($)
Peer Group
Total
Shareholder
Return
(5)
($)
2022
14,279,027
33,759,455
3,547,447
7,453,688
192.66
169.63
3,937
5,884
2021
11,685,670
31,665,177
3,034,079
6,990,851
157.58
160.73
1,260
2,743
2020
9,705,007
2,779,133
2,393,762
1,125,081
84.22
103.42
432
1,341
(1)
Our principal executive officer (PEO) for each of the fiscal years 2022, 2021 and 2020 is Mr. Will. Our other named executive officers for each of the fiscal years 2022, 2021 and 2020 are Mr. Bohn, Mr. Barnard, Mr. Frost and Ms. Menzel.
(2)
The amounts shown as compensation actually paid have been calculated in accordance with SEC rules and do not reflect compensation actually realized or received by the company’s named executive officers. As described in footnote 3 of the summary compensation table, our assumptions with respect to the FASB ASC Topic 718 valuation of our equity awards granted in 2022 are described in the footnotes to our audited financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2022. In accordance with SEC rules, the aggregate grant date fair value of the PRSUs is calculated based on the probable outcome of the performance conditions as of the grant date, which, for the PRSUs reflected in the summary compensation table for each of the fiscal years 2020, 2021 and 2022, was target level performance. In accordance with SEC rules, the change in fair value of the PRSUs as of the end of each of the fiscal years 2020, 2021 and 2022 is based upon the probable outcome of the performance conditions as of the last day of the applicable fiscal year. The amounts included in the columns in footnotes 3 and 4 below identified as “Year-End Fair Value of Equity Awards Granted During Applicable Year,” “Change in Fair Value as of Year-End of Any Prior Year Awards that Remain Unvested as of Year-End,” and “Change in Fair Value as of the Vesting Date of Any Prior Year Awards that Vested During Applicable Year,” are based on the probable outcome, as of the last day of the applicable fiscal year, of the PRSU performance conditions, reflecting the actual outcome of the performance conditions of the applicable PRSU awards to date as of the last day of such fiscal year. For more information regarding how we determine the number of PRSUs earned, see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Compensation Discussion and Analysis: In Detail — Review and Approval of 2022 Long-Term Incentives — How We Determine the Number of PRSUs Earned.”
(3)
The following table discloses the amounts deducted from and added to the total compensation of our principal executive officer in determining our principal executive
officer’s compensation actually paid (determined as described in footnote 2 above) for each fiscal year shown in the pay for performance table:
Year
Summary
Compensation
Table Total

($)
Minus:
Change in
Pension
Value and
Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings

($)
Plus:
Pension
Service
Costs
Attributable
to the
Applicable
Year

($)
Minus:
Grant Date
Fair Value
of Equity
Awards
Granted
During
Applicable
Year

($)
Plus:
Year-End
Fair Value
of Equity
Awards
Granted
During
Applicable
Year

($)
Plus:
Change in
Fair Value
as of Year-End
of Any Prior
Year Awards
that Remain
Unvested as of
Year-End

($)
Plus:
Change in
Fair Value
as of the
Vesting
Date of
Any Prior
Year
Awards
that Vested
During
Applicable
Year

($)
Compensation
Actually
Paid

($)
2022
14,279,027
40,080
81,498
9,198,580
18,434,354
5,027,737
5,175,500
33,759,455
2021
11,685,670
72,771
73,194
6,767,986
18,506,213
7,552,436
688,411
31,665,177
2020
9,705,007
124,968
70,767
6,260,802
5,198,095
(3,581,626)
(2,227,296)
2,779,133
(4)
The following table discloses the amounts deducted from and added to the average total compensation of our named executive officers, other than our principal executive officer, in determining those named executive officers’ average compensation actually paid (determined as described in footnote 2 above) for each fiscal year shown in the pay for performance table:
Year
Summary
Compensation
Table Total

($)
Minus:
Change in
Pension
Value and
Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings

($)
Plus:
Pension
Service
Costs
Attributable
to the
Applicable
Year

($)
Minus:
Grant Date
Fair Value
of Equity
Awards
Granted
During
Applicable
Year

($)
Plus:
Year-End
Fair Value
of Equity
Awards
Granted
During
Applicable
Year

($)
Plus:
Change in
Fair Value
as of Year-End
of Any Prior
Year Awards
that Remain
Unvested as of
Year-End

($)
Plus:
Change in
Fair Value
as of the
Vesting
Date of
Any Prior
Year
Awards
that Vested
During
Applicable
Year

($)
Compensation
Actually
Paid

($)
2022
3,547,447
22,240
31,035
1,867,438
3,769,427
1,019,332
976,124
7,453,688
2021
3,034,079
34,549
32,057
1,403,170
3,805,073
1,430,716
126,645
6,990,851
2020
2,393,762
51,596
31,215
1,185,711
982,623
(662,964)
(382,248)
1,125,081
(5)
Each of the peer group companies is a publicly traded manufacturer of agricultural chemical fertilizers. The companies comprising the peer group are CVR Partners LP, Incitec Pivot Limited, LSB Industries, Inc., Nutrien Ltd., OCI N.V., The Mosaic Company and Yara International ASA. For Yara International ASA, Incitec Pivot Limited and OCI N.V., we used their respective home exchange stock prices, converted into U.S. dollars, to calculate their total shareholder return.
(6)
We have a strategic venture with CHS Inc. (CHS) under which CHS owns an equity interest in CF Industries Nitrogen, LLC (CFN), an indirect subsidiary of CF Industries Holdings, Inc., which represents approximately 11% of the membership interests of CFN. Net income represents our net earnings, which includes net earnings attributable to CHS’s noncontrolling interest in the company. Our net earnings attributable to common stockholders for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020 was $3,346 million, $917 million and $317 million, respectively. For more information regarding our strategic venture with CHS, see Note 17 — Noncontrolling Interest in Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of our 2022 Annual Report.
(7)
See “Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Compensation Discussion and Analysis: In Detail — Key Elements of NEO Compensation Program — Our Metrics Defined” on page 58 for the definition of Adjusted EBITDA and a description of how Adjusted EBITDA
is calculated from net earnings attributable to common stockholders in our audited financial statements.
   
Company Selected Measure Name Adjusted EBITDA    
Named Executive Officers, Footnote [Text Block]
(1)
Our principal executive officer (PEO) for each of the fiscal years 2022, 2021 and 2020 is Mr. Will. Our other named executive officers for each of the fiscal years 2022, 2021 and 2020 are Mr. Bohn, Mr. Barnard, Mr. Frost and Ms. Menzel.
   
Peer Group Issuers, Footnote [Text Block]
(5)
Each of the peer group companies is a publicly traded manufacturer of agricultural chemical fertilizers. The companies comprising the peer group are CVR Partners LP, Incitec Pivot Limited, LSB Industries, Inc., Nutrien Ltd., OCI N.V., The Mosaic Company and Yara International ASA. For Yara International ASA, Incitec Pivot Limited and OCI N.V., we used their respective home exchange stock prices, converted into U.S. dollars, to calculate their total shareholder return.
   
PEO Total Compensation Amount $ 14,279,027 $ 11,685,670 $ 9,705,007
PEO Actually Paid Compensation Amount $ 33,759,455 31,665,177 2,779,133
Adjustment To PEO Compensation, Footnote [Text Block]
(3)
The following table discloses the amounts deducted from and added to the total compensation of our principal executive officer in determining our principal executive
officer’s compensation actually paid (determined as described in footnote 2 above) for each fiscal year shown in the pay for performance table:
Year
Summary
Compensation
Table Total

($)
Minus:
Change in
Pension
Value and
Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings

($)
Plus:
Pension
Service
Costs
Attributable
to the
Applicable
Year

($)
Minus:
Grant Date
Fair Value
of Equity
Awards
Granted
During
Applicable
Year

($)
Plus:
Year-End
Fair Value
of Equity
Awards
Granted
During
Applicable
Year

($)
Plus:
Change in
Fair Value
as of Year-End
of Any Prior
Year Awards
that Remain
Unvested as of
Year-End

($)
Plus:
Change in
Fair Value
as of the
Vesting
Date of
Any Prior
Year
Awards
that Vested
During
Applicable
Year

($)
Compensation
Actually
Paid

($)
2022
14,279,027
40,080
81,498
9,198,580
18,434,354
5,027,737
5,175,500
33,759,455
2021
11,685,670
72,771
73,194
6,767,986
18,506,213
7,552,436
688,411
31,665,177
2020
9,705,007
124,968
70,767
6,260,802
5,198,095
(3,581,626)
(2,227,296)
2,779,133
   
Non-PEO NEO Average Total Compensation Amount $ 3,547,447 3,034,079 2,393,762
Non-PEO NEO Average Compensation Actually Paid Amount $ 7,453,688 6,990,851 1,125,081
Adjustment to Non-PEO NEO Compensation Footnote [Text Block]
(4)
The following table discloses the amounts deducted from and added to the average total compensation of our named executive officers, other than our principal executive officer, in determining those named executive officers’ average compensation actually paid (determined as described in footnote 2 above) for each fiscal year shown in the pay for performance table:
Year
Summary
Compensation
Table Total

($)
Minus:
Change in
Pension
Value and
Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings

($)
Plus:
Pension
Service
Costs
Attributable
to the
Applicable
Year

($)
Minus:
Grant Date
Fair Value
of Equity
Awards
Granted
During
Applicable
Year

($)
Plus:
Year-End
Fair Value
of Equity
Awards
Granted
During
Applicable
Year

($)
Plus:
Change in
Fair Value
as of Year-End
of Any Prior
Year Awards
that Remain
Unvested as of
Year-End

($)
Plus:
Change in
Fair Value
as of the
Vesting
Date of
Any Prior
Year
Awards
that Vested
During
Applicable
Year

($)
Compensation
Actually
Paid

($)
2022
3,547,447
22,240
31,035
1,867,438
3,769,427
1,019,332
976,124
7,453,688
2021
3,034,079
34,549
32,057
1,403,170
3,805,073
1,430,716
126,645
6,990,851
2020
2,393,762
51,596
31,215
1,185,711
982,623
(662,964)
(382,248)
1,125,081
   
Equity Valuation Assumption Difference, Footnote [Text Block]
(2)
The amounts shown as compensation actually paid have been calculated in accordance with SEC rules and do not reflect compensation actually realized or received by the company’s named executive officers. As described in footnote 3 of the summary compensation table, our assumptions with respect to the FASB ASC Topic 718 valuation of our equity awards granted in 2022 are described in the footnotes to our audited financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2022. In accordance with SEC rules, the aggregate grant date fair value of the PRSUs is calculated based on the probable outcome of the performance conditions as of the grant date, which, for the PRSUs reflected in the summary compensation table for each of the fiscal years 2020, 2021 and 2022, was target level performance. In accordance with SEC rules, the change in fair value of the PRSUs as of the end of each of the fiscal years 2020, 2021 and 2022 is based upon the probable outcome of the performance conditions as of the last day of the applicable fiscal year. The amounts included in the columns in footnotes 3 and 4 below identified as “Year-End Fair Value of Equity Awards Granted During Applicable Year,” “Change in Fair Value as of Year-End of Any Prior Year Awards that Remain Unvested as of Year-End,” and “Change in Fair Value as of the Vesting Date of Any Prior Year Awards that Vested During Applicable Year,” are based on the probable outcome, as of the last day of the applicable fiscal year, of the PRSU performance conditions, reflecting the actual outcome of the performance conditions of the applicable PRSU awards to date as of the last day of such fiscal year. For more information regarding how we determine the number of PRSUs earned, see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Compensation Discussion and Analysis: In Detail — Review and Approval of 2022 Long-Term Incentives — How We Determine the Number of PRSUs Earned.”
   
Compensation Actually Paid vs. Total Shareholder Return [Text Block]
Compensation Actually Paid vs. Total Shareholder Return
[MISSING IMAGE: bc_totsharehold-pn.jpg]
   
Compensation Actually Paid vs. Net Income [Text Block]
Compensation Actually Paid vs. Net Income
[MISSING IMAGE: bc_netincome-pn.jpg]
   
Compensation Actually Paid vs. Company Selected Measure [Text Block]
Compensation Actually Paid vs. Adjusted EBITDA
[MISSING IMAGE: bc_adjustebitda-pn.jpg]
   
Total Shareholder Return Vs Peer Group [Text Block]
The graph presented below presents a comparison of the cumulative total shareholder return on the company’s common stock with the cumulative total return of a peer group of publicly traded manufacturers of agricultural chemical fertilizers (“Peer Group”), over the three-year period from 2020 to 2022.
Comparison of Total Shareholder Return
[MISSING IMAGE: lc_totsharehold-pn.jpg]
   
Tabular List [Table Text Block]
Most Important Financial Performance Measures
Our compensation and management development committee selects performance metrics for our incentive compensation programs that align executive interests with those of our shareholders. See “Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Compensation Discussion and Analysis: In Detail — Key Elements of NEO Compensation Program” on page 57 for the definition of these metrics and further explanation of how our compensation metrics in our annual incentive plan and long-term incentive plan tie to our business strategy. Below in an unranked order, are the most important financial performance measures used for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2022.
Metric
Alignment
Adjusted EBITDA
Adjusted EBITDA is a cornerstone of our annual short-term incentive program. It is the primary metric by which we measure our profitability and by which investors measure our performance.
Return on Net Assets (RONA)
Our PRSU awards are subject to three-year vesting criteria based on RONA over three one-year periods. RONA is correlated with long-term total shareholder return and is viewed as an indicator of the results of management’s operating decisions.
Total Shareholder Return (TSR)
Our PRSU awards have a modifier pursuant to which the number of shares earned based on RONA may be increased or decreased by up to 20% based on our three-year TSR as compared to threshold, target and maximum levels of performance. Use of TSR as a performance measure establishes a clear linkage between executive incentives and shareholder value creation.
   
Total Shareholder Return Amount $ 192.66 157.58 84.22
Peer Group Total Shareholder Return Amount 169.63 160.73 103.42
Net Income (Loss) $ 3,937,000,000 $ 1,260,000,000 $ 432,000,000
Company Selected Measure Amount 5,884,000,000 2,743,000,000 1,341,000,000
PEO Name Mr. Will    
Additional 402(v) Disclosure [Text Block]
(6)
We have a strategic venture with CHS Inc. (CHS) under which CHS owns an equity interest in CF Industries Nitrogen, LLC (CFN), an indirect subsidiary of CF Industries Holdings, Inc., which represents approximately 11% of the membership interests of CFN. Net income represents our net earnings, which includes net earnings attributable to CHS’s noncontrolling interest in the company. Our net earnings attributable to common stockholders for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020 was $3,346 million, $917 million and $317 million, respectively. For more information regarding our strategic venture with CHS, see Note 17 — Noncontrolling Interest in Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of our 2022 Annual Report.
   
Percentage of Membership Interest 0.11    
Net Income (Loss) Available to Common Stockholders, Basic $ 3,346,000,000 $ 917 $ 317
Measure [Axis]: 1      
Pay vs Performance Disclosure [Table]      
Measure Name Adjusted EBITDA    
Non-GAAP Measure Description [Text Block]
(7)
See “Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Compensation Discussion and Analysis: In Detail — Key Elements of NEO Compensation Program — Our Metrics Defined” on page 58 for the definition of Adjusted EBITDA and a description of how Adjusted EBITDA
is calculated from net earnings attributable to common stockholders in our audited financial statements.
   
Measure [Axis]: 2      
Pay vs Performance Disclosure [Table]      
Measure Name Return on Net Assets (RONA)    
Measure [Axis]: 3      
Pay vs Performance Disclosure [Table]      
Measure Name Total Shareholder Return (TSR)    
PEO [Member] | Change in Pension Value and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings [Member]      
Pay vs Performance Disclosure [Table]      
Adjustment to Compensation Amount $ 40,080 72,771 124,968
PEO [Member] | Pension Service Costs Attributable to the Applicable Year [Member]      
Pay vs Performance Disclosure [Table]      
Adjustment to Compensation Amount 81,498 73,194 70,767
PEO [Member] | Grant Date Fair Value of Equity Awards Granted During Applicable Year [Member]      
Pay vs Performance Disclosure [Table]      
Adjustment to Compensation Amount 9,198,580 6,767,986 6,260,802
PEO [Member] | Year-End Fair Value of Equity Awards Granted During Applicable Year [Member]      
Pay vs Performance Disclosure [Table]      
Adjustment to Compensation Amount 18,434,354 18,506,213 5,198,095
PEO [Member] | Change in Fair Value as of Year-End of Any Prior Year Awards that Remain Unvested as of Year-End [Member]      
Pay vs Performance Disclosure [Table]      
Adjustment to Compensation Amount 5,027,737 7,552,436 (3,581,626)
PEO [Member] | Change in Fair Value as of the Vesting Date of Any Prior Year Awards that Vested During Applicable Year [Member]      
Pay vs Performance Disclosure [Table]      
Adjustment to Compensation Amount 5,175,500 688,411 (2,227,296)
Non-PEO NEO [Member] | Change in Pension Value and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings [Member]      
Pay vs Performance Disclosure [Table]      
Adjustment to Compensation Amount 22,240 34,549 51,596
Non-PEO NEO [Member] | Pension Service Costs Attributable to the Applicable Year [Member]      
Pay vs Performance Disclosure [Table]      
Adjustment to Compensation Amount 31,035 32,057 31,215
Non-PEO NEO [Member] | Grant Date Fair Value of Equity Awards Granted During Applicable Year [Member]      
Pay vs Performance Disclosure [Table]      
Adjustment to Compensation Amount 1,867,438 1,403,170 1,185,711
Non-PEO NEO [Member] | Year-End Fair Value of Equity Awards Granted During Applicable Year [Member]      
Pay vs Performance Disclosure [Table]      
Adjustment to Compensation Amount 3,769,427 3,805,073 982,623
Non-PEO NEO [Member] | Change in Fair Value as of Year-End of Any Prior Year Awards that Remain Unvested as of Year-End [Member]      
Pay vs Performance Disclosure [Table]      
Adjustment to Compensation Amount 1,019,332 1,430,716 (662,964)
Non-PEO NEO [Member] | Change in Fair Value as of the Vesting Date of Any Prior Year Awards that Vested During Applicable Year [Member]      
Pay vs Performance Disclosure [Table]      
Adjustment to Compensation Amount $ 976,124 $ 126,645 $ (382,248)