Exhibit
99.3
Washington
Mutual, Inc.
Prepared
Remarks for Second Quarter 2007 Earnings Conference Call
July
18, 2007
Please
see the Cautionary Statements at the end of this document
 |
Remarks
of Kerry Killinger
Chairman
and CEO
|
Good
afternoon, everyone. Thank you for joining us today as we review our second
quarter 2007 results.
As
Alan
mentioned, joining me today on the call is Tom Casey, our CFO. And our
President, Steve Rotella, will also be available to answer questions at the
end
of our remarks this afternoon.
Second
Quarter 2007 Earnings
Today
we
announced second quarter net income of $830 million, or 92 cents per share,
up
16 percent from $767 million, or 79 cents per share in the second quarter
of
2006. Earnings per share for the second quarter were also up 7 percent from
86
cents in the first quarter.
I’m
also
pleased to announce that the Board once again increased the quarterly cash
dividend – for the 48th consecutive quarter – by one cent, to 56 cents per
share.
Overview
Our
performance this quarter once again demonstrates the strength and momentum
of
our retail strategy, which continues to fuel impressive organic growth,
and the
benefits of our work to diversify the company. The ability to generate
strong
organic growth is, I believe, a hallmark of the most successful, top-tier
performing companies. Our commitment to innovation in products and services
–
from our new WaMu Free Checking™ to WaMu Mortgage Plus™ to our efficient,
low-cost commercial lending platform – as well as our continued focus on
delivering best-in-class service, helped drive several performance records
in
the second quarter.
Our
Retail
Banking group hit another new record, opening over 406,000 net new checking
accounts in the quarter. In Card Services, we opened an impressive 928,000
new
credit card accounts – also a record. And our Commercial Group turned in a
record $4.3 billion in loan originations – an increase of 18 percent over the
prior quarter.
|
|
Prepared Remarks - July 18, 2007 |
Page
2
|
We
also
saw improvement in the performance from our Home Loans Group, despite continued
pressure from the challenging rate environment and ongoing weakness in the
subprime mortgage market, as well as continued erosion in the housing
market.
Following
on the heels of being recognized by BusinessWeek in its first-ever
ranking of the best 25 companies for customer service last February – WaMu was
the only bank to make the list – we were gratified to receive more recognition
this quarter. In May, following an extensive survey of U.S. consumers, WaMu
was
named by the Reputation Institute as the bank with the best reputation in
the
U.S. and WaMu was the only bank included in its ranking of the top 50 best
regarded companies in the country. Then, last month, WaMu was ranked #1 in
the
Midwest and West/Pacific by J.D. Power and Associates in their 2007 Retail
Banking Satisfaction Study.
All
in
all, we delivered a solid performance last quarter in a difficult business
environment.
|
|
·
|
Our
net interest margin was up 11 basis points in the quarter to 2.90
percent
reflecting the results of the portfolio repositioning we completed
in the
first quarter, as well as our ability to grow retail deposits while
maintaining strong deposit pricing
discipline.
|
|
|
·
|
The
growth in our retail checking account base helped drive depositor
and
other retail banking fees up 12 percent year over
year.
|
|
|
·
|
Increased
credit costs and the growth in credit card receivables held in
portfolio
led to an increase in the
provision.
|
|
|
·
|
The
loss from our Home Loans business was reduced to $37 million primarily
from improved subprime gain on
sale.
|
|
|
·
|
And,
finally, our continued focus on productivity and expense management
helped
us hold expenses essentially flat in the second quarter at $2.1
billion,
and our expenses were down 4 percent from the prior year
quarter.
|
In
summary, we are pleased with how our business model is performing. We are
attracting record numbers of new customers with our innovative products and
are
then successfully cross selling our customers products from across all our
business lines. Great examples are:
|
|
·
|
Sale
of credit cards in our retail stores, which have increased from
a run rate
of 13 cards per store per month a year ago to 23 cards per store
per month
this past quarter.
|
|
|
·
|
Sales
of prime home loans through our retail stores, the volume of which
nearly
doubled from last year’s second
quarter.
|
|
|
·
|
And,
the sales of prime home equity loans through our Home Loans segment
which
now comprises a significantly larger portion of our total home
equity
production.
|
With
that,
let me comment in a little more depth on the performance in each of our business
units in the second quarter.
Retail
Banking
I’ll
begin
with our Retail Banking business.
Our
Retail
Bank produced another strong quarter with net income of $558 million and
record
checking account growth. While net income attributed to portfolio management
improved modestly, an increase in credit costs – particularly in home equity
lending – resulted in a higher provision for loan and lease losses, which
reduced net income from the retail banking network.
An
important fact to be aware of is the impact of the company’s decision to limit
asset growth on the Retail Bank. Average loans outstanding in the retail
bank
portfolio declined 18 percent over the past year; however, net interest income
was only down 3 percent. This reflects the solid deposit growth we achieved,
while maintaining strong deposit pricing discipline. The cost of retail deposits
has now declined in each of the last three quarters from 2.93 percent at
the end
of 2006 to 2.86 percent in the second quarter. Meanwhile, average deposits
were
up 5 percent year over year and 1 percent from the prior
quarter.
|
|
Prepared Remarks - July 18, 2007 |
Page
3
|
As
I
already mentioned, we opened a record 406,000 net new checking accounts
in the
second quarter, an increase of 24 percent from the first quarter and breaking
the record set in the second quarter last year. The results this quarter
were
particularly gratifying, since the second quarter last year benefited from
the
first full quarter of our new WaMu Free Checking™ product. Also, net new
households grew by 228,000, or 17 percent over the prior quarter. And home
equity originations increased to $9.9 billion, surpassing last quarter’s
production by 19 percent.
With
the
1.2 million new accounts added to our retail checking account base in the
last
twelve months, depositor and other retail banking fees were up 12 percent
year
over year, or up 16 percent when the $21 million incentive payment from
MasterCard is excluded from last year’s second quarter fees.
|
|
Prepared Remarks - July 18, 2007 |
Page
4
|
Our
efforts in Small Business continue to deliver good results. During the
second
quarter, we opened 69,000 net new Small Business checking accounts, up
19
percent from the first quarter and 26 percent from the second quarter
of last
year. Average small business deposits of $8.3 billion were up 20 percent
year
over year and contributed to overall retail deposit growth. Average small
Business loans increased to $1.2 billion, a 74 percent increase from
the prior
year quarter.
WaMu.com,
our online distribution channel continues to contribute significantly
to our
growth. In the second quarter, we added 89,000 net new checking accounts
– twice
the number opened in the second quarter last year – through this fast-growing
channel. And according to a recent study published by Web metrics firm,
ComScore
Networks, WaMu generated 35 percent of all new online checking accounts
within
our footprint markets, more than double that of our nearest competitor.
We also
continued to open a significant number of savings, CD and credit card
accounts
and other products online to meet the needs of our customers.
We
opened
11 new retail banking stores in the quarter – a total of 17 new stores year to
date – and expect to ramp up our store openings in the second half of the year.
We are currently targeting a total of around 100 – at the low end of our
projected openings of 100 to 125 for 2007 – as we continue to exercise
discipline around our new store openings and take into account the strong
growth
in our online channel.
Card
Services
Our
Card
Services group continued to deliver strong account and balance growth
in the
second quarter. During the quarter, we added a record 928,000 new credit
card
accounts, with strong performance across all channels. Credit card new
account
sales through our retail channel to WaMu customers accounted for about
one-third
of overall sales. At the end of the quarter, managed receivables from
WaMu
customers totaled $3.3 billion, or 13 percent of total receivables. So,
we feel
we have significant opportunity within that customer base to grow. Managed
receivables of $25 billion at the end of the second quarter were up 18
percent
year over year and 6 percent from the prior quarter.

|
|
Prepared Remarks - July 18, 2007 |
Page
5
|
Net
income
of $141 million for the quarter was down from $256 million in the first
quarter,
reflecting the strong growth in receivables. With on-balance sheet
receivables
growing by $423 million to $9.9 billion, the provision was approximately
$125
million higher in the second quarter than the first quarter.
Credit
quality remained strong in the quarter. As we’ve said in the past, we
anticipate that both the delinquency and loss levels will increase
as the
economy slows, although the most important economic factor is unemployment,
which remained low at 4.5 percent nationally.
Commercial
Group
For
the
Commercial Group, net income of $113 million in the second quarter
was up
35 percent from the second quarter last year and 20 percent from the first
quarter, primarily due to an increase in noninterest income resulting
from
higher gain on sale from favorable hedging results. We do not expect
similar
strength in gain on sale for the third quarter.

As
I
mentioned, the Commercial Group delivered record loan originations
of $4.3
billion in the second quarter, up 47 percent year over year and 18
percent on a
linked quarter basis, driven primarily by strong growth in multi-family
and
commercial real estate lending.
Average
loans were relatively flat in the quarter compared to the prior quarter,
but
were up 23 percent from the same quarter last year, again primarily
due to
continued growth in multi-family and nonresidential assets, as well
as our
acquisition of Commercial Capital Bancorp.
Credit
quality continued to be outstanding.
Home
Loans
Turning
to
our Home Loans business, I continue to be optimistic that the segment
is on
track to return to profitability by the end of the year.
The
second
quarter net loss of $37 million was an improvement over the $113 million
loss in
the first quarter and was due, in large part, to improved subprime
results.
Subprime loss on sale of loans, and the decrease in the value of the
subprime
residual portfolio, totaled a loss of
$131
million in the second quarter, or about half the $252 million in losses
recognized in the first quarter.
Favorable
MSR performance, the rollout of WaMu Mortgage Plus™ and our continued focus on
growing originations through our retail and wholesale distribution
network also
contributed to the improvement in the segment’s net income.
|
|
Prepared Remarks - July 18, 2007 |
Page
6
|
Our
prime
business continues to perform well and is profitable. Prime home
loan volume was
up a solid 7 percent for the quarter on a linked quarter basis, gaining
ground
from the seasonally low first quarter, with most of the growth in
fixed-rate and
hybrid ARM loans. Gain on sale for this portion of the business remained
strong,
reflecting solid sales volume of fixed and hybrid loans as well as
better gain
on sale rates.
We
continued to exercise caution, however, with regard to the subprime
market and
continue to take proactive steps to further reduce our exposure.
We reduced our
subprime volumes by 30 percent from the first quarter and 70 percent from
the second quarter of last year.
I’ll
have
a few more comments about the housing market and subprime lending
after Tom
reviews the financials in more detail. Tom?
|
|
Prepared Remarks - July 18, 2007 |
Page
7
|
 |
Remarks
of Tom Casey
Executive
Vice President and CFO
|
Thank
you,
Kerry.
As
Kerry
said, we are making good progress in all our businesses, including
record
customer growth rates in three of our four segments. We are also
seeing the
benefit of our efforts over the past 18 months to reduce our operating
costs,
improve service levels and proactively manage our asset/liability
mix and
capital. During the second quarter our return on assets equaled
1.05
percent, up nicely from 88 basis point in last year’s second quarter and 95
basis points on a linked quarter basis. We also improved our efficiency
ratio in
the quarter to 56.38 percent from 61.27 percent in last year’s second
quarter.
So,
now
let’s take a deeper look at the second quarter’s financial
performance.
Asset
Growth
Halfway
through 2007, our average assets are down 7 percent from 2006.
The decline is
primarily due to the asset repositioning initiated at the end of
2006, which
resulted in the sale of approximately $22 billion in low-yielding
assets.
Excluding the asset repositioning, assets have been relatively
flat over the
past twelve months. During this period, the yield curve has been
mostly inverted
and credit spreads have been very tight, and we have been very
selective about
the new assets we add to our balance sheet.

Yield
Curve and Net Interest Margin
The
asset
repositioning we did earlier in this year had a very favorable
impact on our net
interest margin, contributing to an 11 basis point increase in
the NIM to 2.90
percent in the second quarter. Short-term rates for the quarter
remained pretty
stable with 3-month LIBOR remaining at 5.35 percent. While we continued
to see
some upward repricing of certain assets during the second quarter,
the
securitization of aged higher-yielding credit card loans toward
the end of the
first quarter resulted in the yield on assets declining 2 basis
points for the
quarter.
|
|
Prepared Remarks - July 18, 2007 |
Page
8
|

The
NIM
improvement for the quarter was driven by the liability side
of the balance
sheet. Three things drove most of the 13 basis point decline
in the cost of our
liabilities during the second quarter:
|
|
·
|
First,
interest bearing deposit costs were lowered 5 basis
points, primarily due
to significant reduction in the level of high cost
brokered
CDs.
|
|
|
·
|
Second,
we lowered the average balance of high-rate FHLB Advances
by $14 billion.
As of the end of the quarter, we have reduced FHLB
Advances by more than
$22 billion since year end.
|
|
|
·
|
And
third, our non interest bearing sources added 4 basis
points, primarily
driven by our continued success with free checking
growth in the Retail
Bank.
|
During
the
second quarter, we saw the yield curve develop a positive slope
as long-term
rates increased. The 5-year swap rate increased 59 basis points
and the 10-year
swap was up 61 basis points. Conversely, short-term rates remained
unchanged and
the forward yield curve projects that they will stay flat through
the end of the
year.

|
|
Prepared Remarks - July 18, 2007 |
Page
9
|
A
favorable impact of the increase in long-term rates was lower
than expected MSR
hedging costs. MSR hedging costs were $21 million for the quarter
compared to
$124 million in the first quarter. The improvement was driven,
in part, by our
long-planned conversion from a static valuation method to the
option-adjusted
spread, or OAS, valuation approach for our MSR, and in part
by rising long-term
interest rates that slowed mortgage prepayment speeds during
the second quarter.
The OAS methodology we adopted is consistent with the method
used by most of our
peers, and we believe it will improve the efficiency of our
hedging strategy and
lower the cost of hedging the MSR.
Credit
Quality
Now
let’s
turn to credit. Market conditions are having a material impact
on the
performance of our home loan and home equity loan portfolios.
We are
experiencing rising NPAs and charge-offs due to the dramatic
slowing in home
price appreciation in most parts of the country and absolute
declines in home
values in some of the markets we serve and continue to monitor
all the markets
we lend in and adjust our underwriting standards based on changes
in market
conditions.
During
the
first quarter, our nonperforming assets were 1.29 percent of
total assets at
quarter end, up from 1.02 percent of assets at the end of the
first quarter. The
increase was primarily due to higher nonaccrual loans in our
prime, subprime and
home equity portfolios.

We
also
saw an increase in net charge-offs to $271 million in the second
quarter, up
from
$183
million in the first quarter. The increase was primarily attributable
to the
subprime loan portfolio, where net charge-offs increased to
$92 million from $39
million. Home equity loans also saw an increase in net charge-offs
to $52
million from $26 million. Both of these portfolios are seeing
an increase in the
severity of charge-offs as housing values continue to soften
across the
country. Despite some challenging trends, overall home equity
charge-offs remain within our expectations and we have mortgage
insurance on
loans with CLTVs greater than 90 percent. We expect the increasing
trend of
weaker home prices to continue in the second half of the year
and anticipate
increasing loss severity in both our subprime and home equity
portfolios, which
are most sensitive to falling home values.
Despite
the increase in nonaccrual prime single-family mortgage loans,
net charge-offs
on those loans declined to $20 million in the quarter from
$34 million in the
first quarter. While we anticipate that we will see higher
NPAs across all our
home loan portfolios, we expect losses in prime loans to be
much lower due to
the lower LTVs and high FICO profile of the prime portfolio.
At quarter end, our
SFR prime portfolio had an estimated average current LTV of
56 percent and an
average FICO score of 707.
|
|
Prepared Remarks - July 18, 2007 |
Page
10
|
Our
$29.3
billion multi-family loan portfolio continues to perform
very well, with NPAs at
a low of 24 basis points and no net charge-offs for the year.
We
also
continue to be pleased with the performance of our credit
card portfolio, where
30-plus day delinquencies fell to 5.11 percent at quarter
end from 5.15 percent
at the end of first quarter, and the quarter’s managed credit losses remained in
line with expectations at 6.49 percent.
In
discussing credit quality, it’s also important to look at the valuation of
subprime residuals. During the second quarter, previously
sold subprime loans
underlying our residual interests continued to perform poorly.
As a result, we
recorded a $93 million downward adjustment in subprime residual
value, which is
similar to the negative adjustment of $88 million in the
first quarter. At
quarter end, the subprime residual balance was $79 million.
As
we did
last quarter, we have provided you with a comprehensive set
of charts as an
appendix to these remarks which include additional credit
statistics related to
our loan portfolios.
Provision
for Loan Losses
The
provision for loan losses of $372 million in the second quarter
was up from $234
million in the first quarter, primarily due to an increase
in provision for
credit card loans. The 4 percent increase in balance sheet
credit card
receivables and an increase in forecasted losses due to higher
charge offs and
lower recoveries resulted in an increase in provision for
credit cards to
$229 million in the second quarter from $106 million in the
first quarter, when
on balance sheet card receivables declined.
The
increased provision for the second quarter also reflected
the higher level of
delinquencies and net charge-offs from our home loans portfolios
that I just
discussed. As we look forward we expect those trends to continue
and our
provision level to increase. That expectation will be reflected
in our earnings
drivers which I’m going to cover right now.
Earnings
Driver Guidance
This
update of our earnings drivers for 2007 reflects the current
environment and our
expectations for the remainder of the year.
|
2007
Earnings Driver Guidance
|
|
Driver
|
April
2007 Guidance
|
July
2007 Guidance
|
|
1)
Average assets
|
0%
–
5% decline
|
Down
5% - 7%
|
|
2)
Net interest margin
|
2.85%
- 2.95%
|
|
3)
Credit provisioning
|
$1.3
– $1.5 billion
|
$1.5
- $1.7 billion
|
|
4)
Depositor and other retail banking fees
|
10%
– 12% growth
|
12%
- 14% growth
|
|
5)
Noninterest income
|
$6.7
– $6.9 billion
|
$6.9
- $7.1 billion
|
|
6)
Noninterest expense
|
$8.4
- $8.5 billion
|
Average
Assets
Year-to-date
average assets are down 7 percent, or $25 billion from 2006.
As I said most of
that decline was from our proactive asset repositioning to
shed low-yielding
assets. Beyond that we have also been extremely disciplined
in adding assets
during a period of very tight credit spreads and an inverted
curve and we think
this discipline has positioned us well. With the transition
to a slightly
positive sloping yield curve in the second quarter and some
indication of wider
credit spreads, we are cautiously optimistic about growing
our balance sheet
during the second half of the year.
|
|
Prepared Remarks - July 18, 2007 |
Page
11
|
But
we
remain cautious and given our asset levels at the mid-point
of the year, we now
expect that average assets for all of 2007 will be between
5 and 7 percent lower
than average assets of $349 million during 2006. We will
remain disciplined in
our asset management and if we are not able to find assets
that meet our
investment hurdles, we will instead deploy our capital
through share
repurchases.
Net
Interest Margin
We
continue to be comfortable with our NIM guidance of 2.85
percent to 2.95
percent. We are pleased to be in the middle of our range
with a NIM of 2.90
percent in the second quarter, as a result of our asset
repositioning and
deposit pricing discipline. However, with the forward curve
no longer predicting
any reduction in short-term rates from this point, any
NIM improvement will be
more gradual as we continue to remix the balance sheet.
Credit
Provision
We
are
raising our guidance for credit provision based on two
factors. First, is our
expectation that credit costs will continue to increase
as the housing market
continues to slow and we see further softening of housing
values. Second, is the
strong growth of our credit card portfolio, which is above
our forecasted growth
and requires a higher loan loss provision. Therefore, we
are raising our
forecasted credit provision by $200 million to $1.5 to
$1.7 billion for the
year. Given our year-to-date provision of $606 million,
this forecasts an
additional $900 million to $1.1 billion provision for the
second half of the
year. Our current guidance is based on our best thinking
regarding trends in
loan delinquencies, foreclosures and housing valuations
at this
time.
Depositor
and other retail banking fees
The
Retail
Bank has done a terrific job of adding a record number
of net new checking
accounts. That growth is reflected in a 14 percent increase
in depositor and
other retail banking fees over last year’s first half. Given that performance
and the continued strong customer growth, we are raising
our guidance to 12 to
14 percent.
Noninterest
Income
We
are
seeing benefits of our diversified business model coming
through our noninterest
income. Despite a very challenging interest rate environment
which has made
asset growth difficult, we expect to continue to have increases
in depositor and
retail banking fees and credit card noninterest income.
And this quarter, we
also had a significant decrease in our MSR risk management
costs, which is
included in noninterest income. Given these trends, we
are increasing our
noninterest income guidance by $200 million to $6.9 to
$7.1 billion for the
year.
Noninterest
Expense
One
of our
business goals is to drive revenues at twice the pace of
expenses. Better yet,
we like to fund our growth through improved operating efficiency.
We continue to
do this by keeping our expenses essentially flat and we
remain very comfortable
with our full-year noninterest expense guidance range of
$8.4 to $8.5 billion
for the year.
I’ll
now
turn it back over to Kerry for his closing comments.
|
|
Prepared Remarks - July 18, 2007 |
Page
12
|
 |
Kerry
Killinger
Chairman
and CEO (continued)
|
Thanks,
Tom.
Recap
I'd
now
like to let you know about some important changes we're
making in our subprime
mortgage business.
It's
been
over two years since we first began talking to you about
housing prices becoming
inflated and of the high risk of a slowdown in housing
with price declines in
some parts of the country. As a result, we started to
take actions to minimize
our exposure, including tightening our underwriting,
selling off the 2004 and
2005 subprime residuals, delaying our plans to grow our
portfolio of subprime
loans and consciously decreasing our market share of
new subprime originations.
In fact, as I noted earlier, our volume is down 70 percent
from a year
ago.
Now,
you
may recall back in April we announced a $2 billion commitment
to help our
subprime customers who are current in their payments,
but are feeling the
effects of this challenging environment. Our goal is to help these
customers stabilize their finances and avoid foreclosure. I’m pleased
to say that this program has been well received.
Today,
we’re taking another important step to adjust our subprime
lending products and
practices for new customers to reflect the current difficult
conditions –
especially softening house prices.
Effective
immediately, we are implementing new, industry-leading
subprime mortgage lending
standards.
|
|
·
|
First,
we will no longer offer subprime stated-income
loans. In other
words, we will only offer full-income documentation
subprime mortgage
loans.
|
|
|
·
|
Second,
we will not offer subprime adjustable rate
mortgage loans with initial
fixed-rate terms of less than five years -
effectively eliminating the
2/28 and 3/27 products.
|
|
|
·
|
Third,
we will require tax and insurance escrow accounts
with all new subprime
mortgage loans we originate.
|
|
|
·
|
And
fourth, we will offer industry leading disclosures
and enhanced outreach
efforts, including pre-closing contact by WaMu
with the borrower, even
when the borrower has been represented by a
broker.
|
I
want to
emphasize that we remain committed to providing subprime
loans to credit-worthy
borrowers and that we believe these changes are the right
thing to do for
consumers to help them purchase and stay in their homes. It's also
prudent for our business.
Finally,
I
wish to commend the efforts of our regulators to strengthen
the mortgage
industry through their newly issued subprime lending
guidance. We
fully support this guidance and believe it's a step in
the right
direction. However, we also strongly believe that this type of
guidance must apply to ALL subprime mortgage originators
if we are ever going to
bring about positive, meaningful change to this vital
segment of the mortgage
industry.
To
this
end, we urge our regulators and our elected officials
to continue to work toward
creating a level playing field among subprime originators. In doing
so, we believe it will help bring much needed discipline
and integrity back to
the subprime mortgage industry.
I
also
want to challenge mortgage investors to require all mortgage
originators to
adopt similar standards that are disciplined and appropriate
for this current
market environment.
|
|
Prepared Remarks - July 18, 2007 |
Page
13
|
Now,
before we take your questions, I’d like to invite you to join us here in Seattle
for our upcoming annual Investor Day. We will be holding
it on Thursday and
Friday, September 13th and 14th. We will get started
at 3:00 pm on the 13th and
be finished by early afternoon on the 14th. Our focus
this year will be on the
strength and opportunity of our retail strategy. And,
of course, Tom will be
giving you a first look at our ’08 earnings guidance. More details and
instructions on how to register will be available in
the coming weeks. As you
make your travel arrangements, remember we typically
have very nice weather in
September in the Northwest, so you might want to stay
over for the
weekend.
With
that,
Tom, Steve and I would be happy to take your questions.

Credit
Risk Management Q2 2007 Prepared Remarks Appendix July 18, 2007
Loan
Portfolio Mix $215 billion As of 6/30/07 ($ in billions) 1 Single-Family
Residential excludes Custom and Builder Construction and home loans in the
Subprime Mortgage Channel. 2 Home Equity excludes home equity loans included
in
the Subprime Mortgage Channel. 3 Managed Credit Card balances are $15.1 billion
higher. Single-Family Residential1 $88.5 41% Home Equity2 $55.8 26% 14%
Multi-Family $29.3 Subprime Mortgage Channel $20.5 Credit Cards3 $9.9 Other
Commercial $8.7 Other $2.3 9% 5% 4% 1%

Current
FICO = 707 $110.0 $114.1 $125.2 $121.1 $99.5 $93.5 $88.5 0.04% 0.03% 0.03%
0.04%
0.09% 0.14% 0.06% $0 $20 $40 $60 $80 $100 $120 $140 2004 2005 2Q '06 3Q '06
4Q
'06 1Q '07 2Q '07 Period End Portfolio Balance ($ in billions) 0.00% 0.10%
0.20%
0.30% 0.40% 0.50% Annualized NCO Rate SFR Annualized NCO Rate Original LTV
= 70%
Est. Current LTV = 56% Est. Current LTV>90% = 1% Est. Current LTV>80% = 7%
Single- Family Residential Portfolio1 1 Excludes Custom and Builder Construction
and home loans in the Subprime Mortgage Channel.

Amount
by which the current principal balance exceeds the original principal balance
Loan balance Current> original balance as a % of loan balance Current FICO =
696 Original LTV = 72% Est. Current LTV = 61% Est. Current LTV>90% = 1% Est.
Current LTV>80% = 11% $0.04 $0.01 $0.16 $0.89 $1.12 $49.3 $66.3 $71.2 $63.6
$58.1 $1.30 $53.5 Current> original balance as a % of loan balance $0 $10 $20
$30 $40 $50 $60 $70 $80 2003 2004 2005 2006 1Q '07 2Q '07 0.0% 1.0% 2.0%
3.0%
4.0% Amount by which the current principal balance exceeds the original
principal balance Loan balance Current> original balance as a % of loan
balance Current FICO = 696 Original LTV = 72% Est. Current LTV = 61% Est.
Current LTV>90% = 1% Est. Current LTV>80% = 11% $0.04 $0.01 $0.16 $0.89
$1.12 $49.3 $66.3 $71.2 $63.6 $58.1 $1.30 $53.5 Current> original balance as
a % of loan balance Option ARM Portfolio Period End Portfolio Balance ($
in
billions) $49.3 $66.3 $71.0 $57.0 $52.2 $62.7 2.42% 1.93% 1.40% 0.22% 0.09%
0.02%

$43.6
$50.8 $52.8 $52.9 $53.4 $55.8 $52.6 0.38% 0.20% 0.08% 0.05% 0.02% 0.04% 0.05%
$0
$10 $20 $30 $40 $50 $60 2004 2005 2Q '06 3Q '06 4Q '06 1Q '07 2Q '07 Period
End
Portfolio Balance ($ in billions) 0.00% 0.10% 0.20% 0.30% 0.40% 0.50% Annualized
NCO Rate HEL/HELOC Annualized NCO Current FICO = 727 Original Combined LTV
= 72%
Original Combined LTV>90% = 2% Original Combined LTV>80% = 34% 1 Excludes
home equity loans included in the Subprime Mortgage Channel. Home Equity
Loan /
Home Equity LOC Portfolio1
$40
2004 2005 2Q '06 3Q '06 4Q '06 1Q '07 2Q '07 Period End Portfolio Balance
($ in
billions) 0.00% 0.20% 0.40% 0.60% Annualized NCO Rate Other Commercial
Multi-Family Lending Annualized Other Commercial NCO Rate Annualized
Multi-Family NCO Rate 1 $31.2 $32.8 $34.0 $35.1 $38.6 $38.0 $38.0 Commercial
Portfolio 0.59% $0 $10 $20 $30 $40 Period End Portfolio Balance ($ in
billions) 1 Other Commercial consists of Other Real Estate and Commercial
Loans.
Data
presented for periods prior to 4Q ‘05 is for Providian Financial Corp. 2004 2005
2Q '06 3Q '06 4Q '06 1Q '07 2Q '07 Managed Card Services Portfolio Managed
Card
Services Managed Annualized NCO Rate 0 $5 $10 $15 $20 $25 $30 2004 2005 2Q
'06
3Q '06 4Q '06 1Q '07 2Q '07 Period End Managed Receivables ($ in billions)
18.5
$20.0 $21.1 $21.9 $23.5 $23.6 $25.0 6.49% 6.31% 5.84% 5.68% 5.99% 7.72% 11.65%
$0 $5 $10 $15 $20 $25 $30 2004 2005 2Q '06 3Q '06 4Q '06 1Q '07 2Q '07 Period
End Managed Receivables ($ in billions) 0% 4% 8% 12% 16% 20%
Nonperforming
Assets Nonperforming Assets $ Nonperforming Assets as a % of Total Assets
$1,937
$1,795 $2,775 $3,259 $4,025 $1,962 0.70% 0.58% 0.57% 0.80% 1.02% 1.29% $0
$500
$1,000 $1,500 $2,000 $2,500 $3,000 $3,500 $4,000 2003 2004 2005 2006 1Q '07
2Q
'07 Period End Balance ($ in millions) 0.10% 0.10% 0.30% 0.50% 0.70% 0.90%
1.10%
1.30% NPA Rate
Allowance
for Loan and Lease Losses $1,695 $1,630 $1,663 $1,560 $244 $510 $116 $271
$316
$816 $224 $372 0.73% 0.68% 0.72% 0.74% $0 $400 $800 $1,200 $1,600 $2,000
2005
2006 2Q '06 2Q '07 Period End Balance ($ in millions) 0.00% 0.20% 0.40%
0.60%
0.80% 1.00% 1.20% Allowance as a % of Loans Held in Portfolio Allowance
for loan
and lease losses (period end) Net Charge-offs Provision Allowance as a
% of
loans held in portfolio 1 Net charge-offs and provision for 2005 reflect
the
acquisition of Providian on 10/1/2005.

Current
FICO>=660 620-659 580-619 <580 Total Home Loans <=80% 66% 10% 6% 10%
92%>80-90% 4% 1% 1% 1% 7%>90% 1% 0% 0% 0% 1% Total 71% 11% 7% 11% 100%
Home Equity Loans2 <=80% 57% 4% 2% 1% 64%>80-90% 24% 4% 1% 2% 31%>90%3
4% 0% 0% 1% 5% Total 85% 8% 3% 4% 100% Estimated Current Loan-to-Value Combined
Origination Loan-to-Value June 2007 1 Includes Subprime Mortgage Channel.
2 Home
Equity Loans include the HELOC, HEL and HEL Subprime portfolios. 3 Home Equity
Loans with CLTVs in excess of 90% are covered by pool mortgage insurance.
Current Credit Quality M
etrics
– Home Loans1

Cautionary
Statements This presentation contains forward-looking statements, which
are not
historical facts and pertain to future operating results. These forward-looking
statements are within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation
Reform
Act of 1995. These forward-looking statements include, but are not limited
to,
statements about our plans, objectives, expectations and intentions and
other
statements contained in this document that are not historical facts.
When used
in this presentation, the words “expects,” “anticipates,” “intends,” “plans,”
“believes,” “seeks,” “estimates,” or words of similar meaning, or future or
conditional verbs, such as “will,” “would,” “should,” “could,” or “may” are
generally intended to identify forward-looking statements. These forward-looking
statements are inherently subject to significant business, economic and
competitive uncertainties and contingencies, many of which are beyond
our
control. In addition, these forward-looking statements are subject to
assumptions with respect to future business strategies and decisions
that are
subject to change. Actual results may differ materially from the results
discussed in these forward-looking statements for the reasons, among
others,
discussed under the heading “Factors That May Affect Future Results” in
Washington Mutual’s 2006 Annual Report on Form 10-K and “Cautionary Statements”
in our Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 which
include: Volatile interest rates and their impact on the mortgage
banking business; Credit risk; Operational
risk; Risks related to credit card operations; Changes in
the regulation of financial services companies, housing government-sponsored
enterprises and credit card lenders; Competition from banking and
nonbanking companies; General business, economic and market
conditions; and Reputational risk There are other factors not
described in our 2006 Form 10-K and Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March
31,
2007 which are beyond the Company’s ability to anticipate or control that could
cause results to differ.