XML 43 R26.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT
v3.5.0.2

COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES | 6 Months Ended
--- | ---
Jun. 30, 2016
Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract] |
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES | COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES From time to time, we are involved in legal proceedings that are incidental to the operation of our businesses. Some of these proceedings allege damages relating to environmental exposures, intellectual property matters, copyright infringement, personal injury claims, employment and employee benefit matters, government contract issues and commercial or contractual disputes and acquisitions or divestitures. We will continue to defend vigorously against all claims. Although the ultimate outcome of any legal matter cannot be predicted with certainty, based on present information including our assessment of the merits of the particular claim, as well as our current reserves and insurance coverage, we do not expect that such legal proceedings will have a material adverse impact on our financial statements, unless otherwise noted below. Asbestos Matters Subsidiaries of ITT, including ITT LLC (f/k/a ITT Corporation) and Goulds Pumps LLC (f/k/a Goulds Pumps, Inc.), have been sued, along with many other legacy companies in product liability lawsuits alleging personal injury due to asbestos exposure. These claims generally allege that certain products sold by our subsidiaries prior to 1985 contained a part manufactured by a third party (e.g., a gasket) which contained asbestos. To the extent these third-party parts may have contained asbestos, it was encapsulated in the gasket (or other) material and was non-friable. As of June 30, 2016, there were 35 thousand pending claims against ITT subsidiaries, filed in various state and federal courts alleging injury as a result of exposure to asbestos. Activity related to these asserted asbestos claims during the period was as follows:
For the Six Months Ended June 30 (in thousands) | 2016
Pending claims – Beginning | 37 |
New claims | 2 |
Dismissals | (4 | )
Pending claims – Ending | 35 |
Frequently, plaintiffs are unable to identify any ITT LLC or Goulds Pumps LLC products as a source of asbestos exposure. Our experience to date is that a majority of resolved claims are dismissed without any payment from ITT subsidiaries. Management believes that a large majority of the pending claims have little or no value. In addition, because claims are sometimes dismissed in large groups, the average cost per resolved claim can fluctuate significantly from period to period. ITT expects more asbestos-related suits will be filed in the future, and ITT will continue to aggressively defend or seek a reasonable resolution, as appropriate. Asbestos litigation is a unique form of litigation. Frequently, the plaintiff sues a large number of defendants and does not state a specific claim amount. After filing complaint, the plaintiff engages defendants in settlement negotiations to establish a settlement value based on certain criteria, including the number of defendants in the case. Rarely do the plaintiffs seek to collect all damages from one defendant. Rather, they seek to spread the liability, and thus the payments, among many defendants. As a result of this and other factors, the Company is unable to estimate the maximum potential exposure to pending claims and claims estimated to be filed over the next 10 years. Estimating our exposure to pending asbestos claims and those that may be filed in the future is subject to significant uncertainty and risk as there are multiple variables that can affect the timing, severity, quality, quantity and resolution of claims. Any predictions with respect to the variables impacting the estimate of the asbestos liability and related asset are subject to even greater uncertainty as the projection period lengthens. In light of the uncertainties and variables inherent in the long-term projection of the Company's asbestos exposures, although it is probable that the Company will incur additional costs for asbestos claims filed beyond the next 10 years, which additional costs may be material, we do not believe there is a reasonable basis for estimating those costs at this time. The asbestos liability and related receivables reflect management's best estimate of future events. However, future events affecting the key factors and other variables for either the asbestos liability or the related receivables could cause actual costs or recoveries to be materially higher or lower than currently estimated. Due to these uncertainties, as well as our inability to reasonably estimate any additional asbestos liability for claims which may be filed beyond the next 10 years, it is difficult to predict the ultimate cost of resolving all pending and unasserted asbestos claims. We believe it is possible that future events affecting the key factors and other variables within the next 10 years, as well as the cost of asbestos claims filed beyond the next 10 years, net of expected recoveries, could have a material adverse effect on our financial statements. Income Statement Charges As part of our ongoing review of our net asbestos exposure, each quarter we assess the most recent qualitative and quantitative data available for the key inputs and assumptions, comparing the data to expectations on which the most recent annual liability and asset estimates were calculated. Based on this evaluation, the Company determined that no change in the estimate was warranted for the quarter ended June 30, 2016 other than the incremental accrual to maintain a rolling 10-year forecast period. A net asbestos charge of $15.2 and $30.6 was recognized in the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 and $15.9 and $31.3 in the three and six months June 30, 2015, respectively, to maintain the 10-year forecast period. During the first quarter of 2016, we entered into a settlement agreement with an insurer to settle responsibility for multiple insurance claims, resulting in a benefit of $2.6. During the second quarter of 2016, ITT entered into a settlement agreement (Settlement) with an insurer to settle responsibility for multiple insurance claims. Under the terms of the Settlement, the insurer agreed to a specified series of payments over the course of the next five years to a Qualified Settlement Fund, resulting in a loss of $4.7. During the second quarter of 2015, the Company changed its asbestos defense strategy and retained a single firm to defend the Company in all asbestos litigation. This long-term strategy streamlined the Company’s management of cases and significantly reduced defense costs. Our agreement with the defense firm was initially limited to a certain set of claims and the remaining claims were expected to transition within the next four years; however, in connection with the Settlement, ITT was able to transition the remaining claims during the second quarter of 2016. Based on the terms of the agreement, the Company adjusted its asbestos liability and related assets and recognized a net benefit of $4.9 and $100.7 during the three months ended June 30, 2016 and June 30, 2015 for the revised estimate of the cost to defend pending claims and claims expected to be filed over the next 10 years. Changes in Financial Position The following table provides a rollforward of the estimated asbestos liability and related assets for the six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015.
| 2016 |  | 2015
For the Six Months Ended June 30 | Liability |  | Asset |  | Net |  | Liability |  | Asset |  | Net
Beginning balance | $ | 1,042.8 |  |  | $ | 412.0 |  |  | $ | 630.8 |  |  | $ | 1,223.2 |  |  | $ | 476.4 |  |  | $ | 746.8 |
Asbestos provision | 35.4 |  |  | 4.8 |  |  | 30.6 |  |  | 36.6 |  |  | 5.3 |  |  | 31.3 |
Defense costs adjustment | (4.9 | ) |  | — |  |  | (4.9 | ) |  | (124.2 | ) |  | (23.5 | ) |  | (100.7 | )
Settlement agreements | — |  |  | (2.1 | ) |  | 2.1 |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |
Net cash activity | (35.3 | ) |  | (23.8 | ) |  | (11.5 | ) |  | (30.4 | ) |  | (23.9 | ) |  | (6.5 | )
Ending balance | $ | 1,038.0 |  |  | $ | 390.9 |  |  | $ | 647.1 |  |  | $ | 1,105.2 |  |  | $ | 434.3 |  |  | $ | 670.9 |
Current portion | $ | 87.4 |  |  | $ | 74.5 |  |  |  |  | $ | 105.7 |  |  | $ | 102.4 |  |  |
Noncurrent portion | $ | 950.6 |  |  | $ | 316.4 |  |  |  |  |  | $ | 999.5 |  |  | $ | 331.9 |  |  |
Environmental In the ordinary course of business, we are subject to federal, state, local, and foreign environmental laws and regulations. We are responsible, or are alleged to be responsible, for ongoing environmental investigation and site remediation. These sites are in various stages of investigation and/or remediation and in many of these proceedings our liability is considered de minimis. We have received notification from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, and from similar state and foreign environmental agencies, that a number of sites formerly or currently owned and/or operated by ITT, and other properties or water supplies that may be or have been impacted from those operations, contain disposed or recycled materials or wastes and require environmental investigation and/or remediation. These sites include instances where we have been identified as a potentially responsible party under federal and state environmental laws and regulations. The following table provides a rollforward of the estimated environmental liability for the six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015.
For the Six Months Ended June 30 | 2016 |  | 2015
Environmental liability - beginning balance | $ | 82.6 |  |  | $ | 89.9 |
Change in estimates for pre-existing accruals |  |  |
Continuing operations | 1.6 |  |  | 1.1 |
Discontinued operations | 0.3 |  |  | (2.8 | )
Net cash activity | (7.7 | ) |  | (7.2 | )
Foreign currency | — |  |  | (0.3 | )
Environmental liability - ending balance | $ | 76.8 |  |  | $ | 80.7 |
In the fourth quarter of 2015, ITT entered into a settlement agreement with one of our insurance providers whereby the provider agreed to pay the net present value of the remaining limits of the policy amounting to approximately $34.2. In the first quarter of 2016, the Company received $2.0 in cash and $32.2 was deposited into a QSF which can be drawn upon only to pay certain future environmental expenses associated with remediation sites covered under the policy, including sites owned by a former subsidiary of the Company. The Company recorded $23.0 of deferred income related to the settlement representing the excess of QSF monies over the probable liabilities associated with the covered remediation sites. In addition to the QSF asset, there is a receivable of $2.0 from other third parties for reimbursement of environmental costs, resulting in a total environmental-related asset of $34.2 as of June 30, 2016. The environmental-related asset as of December 31, 2015 was $12.8. We are currently involved with 40 active environmental investigation and remediation sites. At June 30, 2016, we have estimated the potential high-end liability range of environmental-related matters to be $130. As actual costs incurred at identified sites in future periods may vary from our current estimates given the inherent uncertainties in evaluating environmental exposures, management believes it is possible that the outcome of these uncertainties may have a material adverse effect on our financial statements. Other Matters The Company is responding to a civil subpoena from the Department of Defense, Office of the Inspector General, which was issued in the second quarter of 2015 as part of an investigation being led by the Civil Division of the U.S. Department of Justice. The subpoena and related investigation involve certain products manufactured by the Company’s Interconnect Solutions segment that are purchased or used by the U.S. government. The Company is cooperating with the government and is unable to estimate the timing or outcome of this matter.

X
- References No definition available. + Details
Name: | us-gaap_CommitmentsAndContingenciesDisclosureAbstract
Namespace Prefix: | us-gaap_
Data Type: | xbrli:stringItemType
Balance Type: | na
Period Type: | duration

X
- Definition The entire disclosure for commitments and contingencies. + References Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 825 -SubTopic 20 -Section 50 -Paragraph 1 -URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6449706&loc=d3e16207-108621 Reference 2: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 460 -SubTopic 10 -Section 50 -Paragraph 8 -URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=51674963&loc=d3e12565-110249 Reference 3: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 450 -SubTopic 20 -Section 50 -Paragraph 4 -URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=25496072&loc=d3e14435-108349 Reference 4: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 210 -SubTopic 10 -Section S99 -Paragraph 1 -Subparagraph (SX 210.5-02.25) -URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6877327&loc=d3e13212-122682 Reference 5: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 440 -SubTopic 10 -Section 50 -Paragraph 2 -URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6394976&loc=d3e25287-109308 + Details
Name: | us-gaap_CommitmentsAndContingenciesDisclosureTextBlock
Namespace Prefix: | us-gaap_
Data Type: | nonnum:textBlockItemType
Balance Type: | na
Period Type: | duration