DEF 14A 1 litt2020-def14a.htm ITT INC. - DEF 14A

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934

☑ Filed by the Registrant | ☐ Filed by a Party other than the Registrant

Check the appropriate box:
☐ | Preliminary Proxy Statement
☐ | CONFIDENTIAL, FOR THE USE OF THE COMMISSION ONLY (AS PERMITTED BY RULE 14a-6(e)(2))
☑ | Definitive Proxy Statement
☐ | Definitive Additional Materials
☐ | Soliciting Material Pursuant to Rule 14a-12

ITT Inc.

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
☑ | No fee required.
☐ | Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.
| (1) Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
| (2) Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
| (3) Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):
| (4) Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
| (5) Total fee paid:
☐ | Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
☐ | Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.
| (1) Amount Previously Paid:
| (2) Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
| (3) Filing Party:
| (4) Date Filed:

2020
Notice of Annual Meeting
& Proxy Statement

ITT Inc.

ITT Inc.
1133 Westchester Avenue
White Plains, NY 10604

DEAR FELLOW
SHAREHOLDER

FRANK T. MACINNIS

CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD

March 31, 2020

On behalf of the ITT Inc. Board of Directors, thank you for your continued investment in ITT. The Company delivered another year of exceptional performance in 2019 as our focused strategy continues to produce long-term results for our shareholders. We invite you to join us at our 2020 Annual Meeting on May 15, 2020 at 9:00 a.m. Eastern Time in White Plains, New York. Details regarding admission to the meeting and the business to be conducted are provided in the accompanying Notice of Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement.

BOARD COMPOSITION & REFRESHMENT

It has been an honor to serve as ITT’s independent Chair since 2011. As mentioned last year, I plan to retire at this year’s Annual Meeting as part of a leadership transition strategy in connection with the appointment of Luca Savi as CEO in January 2019. In December 2019, the Board appointed Richard Lavin to serve as ITT’s next independent Chair effective with my retirement.

Rich has served as a director of the Company since 2013, and as Chair of the Board’s Compensation and Personnel Committee since 2017. His deep global manufacturing operations expertise includes a 30-year career with Caterpillar, Inc., extensive international expertise, and legal and human resources experience. This background has allowed him to provide support to our management team as they drive a high-impact strategy, and as Chair he will be in a position to help guide ITT’s strategies for growth and profitability going forward.

We remain thoughtful about our Board composition and effectiveness both through our formal, annual Board and committee evaluation process as well as through our director nominations process. Our deliberate focus on refreshment has allowed us to build a Board that reflects a diversity of skills, experiences, and backgrounds.

SUCCESSFUL CEO TRANSITION

This past year, we completed a seamless CEO succession process and Luca successfully led ITT to another year of strong financial and operational performance. The Board has provided strong, independent oversight of the business strategy through the transition, and has worked closely with Luca and the management team to focus on cultivating an innovative, diverse and inclusive workplace that engages and energizes our employees.

SHAREHOLDER ENGAGEMENT

Shareholder engagement remains a key priority for the Board. The valuable feedback and perspectives received through discussions with our shareholders help to inform ongoing boardroom discussions. We continued our annual outreach and engagement efforts in 2019, engaging with shareholders collectively representing approximately 43% of our outstanding shares. These discussions centered on our Board composition and leadership transition, our executive compensation practices as well as our enhanced sustainability reporting. Shareholders were particularly interested in discussing our first-ever Sustainability Report published in 2019.

Again, I thank you for your continued support and confidence in ITT and thank you for the nearly 19 years that I have had the privilege to serve on this Board. I feel honored to have worked with so many deeply talented people at ITT and look forward to the Company’s continued success.

Thank you for your continued support and confidence in ITT. We hope you can join us at the Annual Meeting.

Sincerely,

FRANK T. MACINNIS

NOTICE OF 2020 ANNUAL
MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

MEETING INFORMATION
FRIDAY, MAY 15, 2020

9:00 a.m. Eastern Time

ITT Inc.

1133 Westchester Avenue

White Plains, NY 10604

ITEMS OF BUSINESS

1. To elect the 11 nominees named in the attached Proxy Statement to the Board of Directors to serve until the 2021 annual meeting of shareholders or until their respective successors shall have been duly elected and qualified.

2. To ratify the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the 2020 fiscal year.

3. To conduct an advisory vote on the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers.

4. To consider a shareholder proposal, if properly presented at the Annual Meeting.

5. To transact such other business as may properly come before the Annual Meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof.

WHO CAN VOTE, RECORD DATE

Holders of record of ITT Inc. common stock at the close of business on March 18, 2020 are entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting and any adjournment or postponement thereof.

MAILING OR AVAILABILITY DATE

Beginning on or about March 31, 2020, this Notice of 2020 Annual Meeting of Shareholders and the attached Proxy Statement are being mailed or made available, as the case may be, to shareholders of record on March 18, 2020.

ABOUT PROXY VOTING

It is important that your shares be represented and voted at the Annual Meeting. If you are a registered shareholder, you may vote online at www.proxyvote.com, by telephone or by mailing a proxy card. You may also vote in person at the Annual Meeting. If you hold shares through a bank, broker or other institution, you may vote your shares by any method specified on the voting instruction form that they provide. See details under “How do I vote?” under “Information about Proxy Statement and Voting.” We encourage you to vote your shares as soon as possible.

By order of the Board of Directors,

MARY BETH GUSTAFSSON

Senior Vice President, General

Counsel and Corporate Secretary

March 31, 2020

REVIEW YOUR PROXY STATEMENT AND VOTE IN ONE OF FOUR WAYS:
ONLINE Visit the website on your proxy card | BY MAIL Sign, date and return your proxy card in the enclosed envelope | BY PHONE Call the telephone number on your proxy card | IN PERSON Attend the Annual Meeting in White Plains, NY See page 73 for instructions on how to attend
Please refer to the enclosed proxy materials or the information forwarded by your bank, broker or other holder of record to see which voting methods are available to you.
IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING THE AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS FOR ITT Inc.’s Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on Friday, May 15, 2020, at 9:00 a.m. Eastern Time The Proxy Statement and 2019 Annual Report to Shareholders are available online at www.proxyvote.com

| * | We intend to hold our 2020 Annual Meeting of Shareholders in person. However, we continue to monitor the situation regarding COVID-19 (coronavirus) closely, taking into account guidance from public health authorities. We are sensitive to the public health and travel concerns our shareholders may have and the protocols that federal, state, and local governments may impose. Accordingly, we may determine that it is advisable to change the date, time, location or manner of conducting the 2020 Annual Meeting of Shareholders. In the event that we change the date, time, location or manner of conducting the 2020 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, we will announce that fact as promptly as practicable with details on how to participate and vote at such meeting. Please monitor our website at www.itt.com/investors for updated information. If you are planning to attend our meeting, please check the website one week prior to the meeting date. As always, we encourage you to vote your shares prior to the 2020 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.

TABLE OF CONTENTS |

PROXY STATEMENT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY |  | 07
Annual Meeting of Shareholders of ITT Inc. |  | 07
Voting Items |  | 07
How to Vote |  | 07
2019 Fiscal Highlights |  | 08
Snapshot of 2020 Director Nominees |  | 09
Corporate Governance Highlights |  | 10
Shareholder Engagement and Responsiveness |  | 10
Executive Compensation Highlights |  | 10
Sustainability Highlights |  | 11
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AND RELATED MATTERS |  | 12
Introduction |  | 12
Corporate Governance Principles |  | 12
Our Board Leadership Structure |  | 13
The Board’s Role in Leadership Succession Planning |  | 13
Directors’ Qualification and Selection Process |  | 13
Board and Committee Evaluation Process |  | 15
Director Orientation and Continuing Education |  | 16
Shareholder Engagement |  | 16
Board and Committee Meetings and Membership |  | 18
Board and Committee Roles in Oversight of Risk |  | 19
Overview of Committees |  | 20
Audit Committee |  | 20
Compensation and Personnel Committee |  | 21
Nominating and Governance Committee |  | 21
Executive Sessions of Directors |  | 22
Hedging and Pledging |  | 22
Director Independence |  | 22
Code of Conduct |  | 23
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation |  | 23
Communication with the Board of Directors |  | 24
Policies for Approving Related Party Transactions |  | 24
Corporate Responsibility and Sustainability |  | 25
ELECTION OF DIRECTORS (PROXY ITEM NO. 1) |  | 26
Election Procedures |  | 26
2020 Director Nominees |  | 26
RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF THE INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM (PROXY ITEM NO. 2) |  | 33
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm Fees |  | 34
Pre-Approval of Audit and Non-Audit Services |  | 34
AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT |  | 35
Role of the Audit Committee |  | 35
Audit Committee Charter |  | 35
Regular Review of Financial Statements |  | 36
Communications with Deloitte |  | 36
Independence of Deloitte |  | 36
Recommendation Regarding Annual Report on Form 10-K |  | 36

ITT INC.❘ 2020 PROXY STATEMENT 5

Back to Contents

ADVISORY VOTE TO APPROVE EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION (PROXY ITEM NO. 3) |  | 37
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS |  | 38
Executive Summary |  | 38
Governance and Compensation |  | 41
Elements of Compensation |  | 43
2019 Annual Incentive Plan |  | 44
2019 Long-Term Incentive Compensation |  | 47
What’s New for 2020? |  | 49
Benefits and Perquisites |  | 49
Other Compensation and Benefits |  | 50
Policies |  | 51
COMPENSATION TABLES |  | 53
Summary Compensation Table |  | 53
All Other Compensation Table |  | 54
Grants of Plan-Based Awards in 2019 |  | 55
Outstanding Equity Awards at 2019 Fiscal Year End |  | 56
Option Exercises and Stock Vested in 2019 |  | 57
2019 Pension Benefits |  | 57
2019 Nonqualifed Deferred Compensation |  | 59
Potential Post-Employment Compensation |  | 62
CEO Pay Ratio |  | 66
COMPENSATION AND PERSONNEL COMMITTEE REPORT |  | 67
2019 NON-MANAGEMENT DIRECTOR COMPENSATION |  | 67
CONSIDERATION OF A SHAREHOLDER PROPOSAL REGARDING PROXY ACCESS (PROXY ITEM NO. 4) |  | 70
OTHER MATTERS |  | 73
Information about the Proxy Statement & Voting |  | 73
Voting Information |  | 74
Stock Ownership of Directors, Executive Officers and Certain Shareholders |  | 80
Equity Compensation Plan Information |  | 81
Form 10-K |  | 82
APPENDIX A |  | 83

ITT INC.❘ 2020 PROXY STATEMENT 6

Back to Contents

PROXY STATEMENT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

This summary highlights selected information in this Proxy Statement. Please review the entire document before voting.

ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS OF ITT INC.

Date | May 15, 2020
Time | 9:00 a.m. Eastern Time
Location | ITT Inc., 1133 Westchester Avenue, White Plains, NY 10604
Admission Information | See page 73 for instructions

VOTING ITEMS

Voting Item | Board Voting Recommendation | Further Information (page)
1. | To elect the 11 nominees named in the Proxy Statement to ITT’s Board of Directors | FOR each nominee | 26
2. | To ratify the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for 2020 | FOR | 33
3. | To conduct an advisory vote on the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers | FOR | 37
4. | To consider a shareholder proposal regarding proxy access | AGAINST | 70

HOW TO VOTE

Your vote is important. You are eligible to vote if you were a shareholder of record at the close of business on March 18, 2020. Even if you plan to attend the meeting, please vote as soon as possible using one of the following methods. In all cases, you should have your proxy card in hand.

YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT: |  |
ONLINE |  | BY MAIL |  | BY PHONE |  | IN PERSON
Visit the website on your proxy card |  | Sign, date and return your proxy card in the enclosed envelope |  | Call the telephone number on your proxy card |  | Attend the Annual Meeting in White Plains, NY. See page 73 for instructions on how to attend

* | We intend to hold our 2020 Annual Meeting of Shareholders in person. However, we continue to monitor the situation regarding COVID-19 (coronavirus) closely, taking into account guidance from public health authorities. We are sensitive to the public health and travel concerns our shareholders may have and the protocols that federal, state, and local governments may impose. Accordingly, we may determine that it is advisable to change the date, time, location or manner of conducting the 2020 Annual Meeting of Shareholders. In the event that we change the date, time, location or manner of conducting the 2020 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, we will announce that fact as promptly as practicable with details on how to participate and vote at such meeting. Please monitor our website at www.itt.com/investors for updated information. If you are planning to attend our meeting, please check the website one week prior to the meeting date. As always, we encourage you to vote your shares prior to the 2020 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.

ITT INC.❘ 2020 PROXY STATEMENT 7

Back to Contents

2019 FISCAL HIGHLIGHTS

(Amounts reported in this section, except per share amounts, are stated in millions unless otherwise specified.)

During 2019, we achieved strong results that reflected continued operational execution and share gain strategies in key global markets. Our results are a reflection of our hard work and focus on creating value for our customers, while also implementing productivity improvements and making strategic investments. The following table provides a summary of our key performance indicators for 2019 with growth comparisons to 2018.

SUMMARY OF KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS FOR 2019

Revenue |  | Orders |  | Segment Operating Income |  | Segment Operating Margin |  | EPS |  | Operating Cash Flow
$2,846 4% Increase |  | $2,813 3% Decrease |  | $432 5% Increase |  | 15.2% 20bp Increase |  | $3.65 3% Decrease |  | $358 4% Decrease

Organic Revenue |  | Organic Orders |  | Adjusted Segment Operating Income |  | Adjusted Segment Operating Margin |  | Adjusted EPS |  | Adjusted Free Cash Flow
$2,868 4% Increase |  | $2,842 2% Decrease |  | $457 10% Increase |  | 16.0% 90bp Increase |  | $3.81 18% Increase |  | $319 95% Conversion

Organic revenue, organic orders, adjusted segment operating income, adjusted EPS, adjusted free cash flow and adjusted free cash flow conversion are financial measures not prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”), which are referred to as non-GAAP financial measures. Please refer to the section titled “Key Performance Indicators and Non-GAAP Financial Measures” in our 2019 Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) on February 21, 2020 for the definition of these non-GAAP financial measures, the reasons why we use these measures and for reconciliations to the most directly comparable measures calculated in accordance with GAAP.

Our 2019 results include:

■ | Revenue of $2.85 billion, a $101.3 or 3.7% increase that included $54.5 from our strategic acquisitions of Rheinhütte Pumpen and Matrix Composites and unfavorable foreign exchange of $76.4. Organic revenue increased 4.5%, driven by the strength of our diversified portfolio as revenue from our industrial businesses grew 8%, oil and gas grew 7%, and transportation grew 3%.
■ | Orders of $2.81 billion, a $78.7 or 2.7% decrease that included $53.6 from our two strategic acquisitions and unfavorable foreign exchange of $81.9. Organic orders decreased 1.7%, due to pump project declines and difficult comparisons within the industrial and oil and gas markets. Transportation orders increased 1% as growth in rail was partially offset by significant prior year defense programs.
■ | Segment operating income increased $21.0 or 5.1%, despite higher acquisition-related costs and restructuring charges. Adjusted segment operating income increased $42.5, or 10.3%, and adjusted segment operating margin grew 90 basis points to 16.0%. This improvement was fueled by increased sales volume from strength in project pumps, Friction OEM share gains, and growth in rail, as well as continued manufacturing and supply chain productivity, cost containment actions, and strategic acquisition benefits. These gains were partially offset by higher commodity costs and tariffs as well as unfavorable foreign exchange.
■ | Income from continuing operations decreased to $3.65 per diluted share as compared to $3.75, driven by a prior year gain of $38.5 on the sale of a former operating location and a prior year favorable deferred tax valuation adjustment, partially offset by a favorable year-over-year net asbestos benefit of $25.1 driven by effective insurance recovery strategies. Adjusted income from continuing operations improved 18.0% to $3.81 per diluted share, reflecting strong adjusted segment operating income growth, a reduction in corporate costs, lower interest and non-operating expenses, and a favorable tax rate.
■ | Operating cash flow of $357.7 decreased $14.1 or 3.8%, primarily due to proceeds of $19.0 received in 2018 from an environmental insurance-related settlement and unfavorable working capital, partially offset by an improvement in segment operating income. Adjusted free cash flow of $318.8 reflected a 94.5% conversion of adjusted income from continuing operations.

ITT INC.❘ 2020 PROXY STATEMENT 8

Back to Contents

SNAPSHOT OF 2020 DIRECTOR NOMINEES

As a whole, our director nominees possess a variety of important qualifications, skills and attributes, including those set forth in the chart below:

DIRECTOR SNAPSHOT

|  |  |  |  |  | Board Committees |
Name | Age | Director Since | Other Public Company Boards | Position | Audit | Compensation and Personnel | Nominating and Governance
Orlando D. Ashford | 51 | 2011 | 0 | President of Holland America Line |  |  |
Geraud Darnis | 60 | 2015 | 0 | Former President & CEO of UTC Building & Industrial Systems |  |  |
Donald DeFosset, Jr. | 71 | 2011 | 3 | Former Chairman, President & CEO of Walter Industries, Inc. |  |  |
Nicholas C. Fanandakis | 63 | 2016 | 2 | Former Executive Vice President of DowDuPont |  |  |
Richard P. Lavin non-executive Chairman as of 2020 Annual Meeting | 68 | 2013 | 1 | Former President & CEO of Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc. |  |  |
Mario Longhi | 65 | 2017 | 1 | Former President & CEO of United States Steel Corporation |  |  |
Rebecca A. McDonald | 67 | 2013 | 0 | Former CEO of Laurus Energy, Inc. |  |  |
Timothy H. Powers | 71 | 2015 | 1 | Former Chairman, President & CEO of Hubbell Incorporated |  |  |
Luca Savi | 54 | 2019 | 0 | CEO & President of ITT Inc. |  |  |
Cheryl L. Shavers | 66 | 2018 | 1 | Chairman & CEO of Global Smarts, Inc. |  |  |
Sabrina Soussan | 50 | 2018 | 1 | CEO of Siemens Mobility |  |  |

| Chair

* | Is a citizen of a non-U.S. country (in some cases, in addition to the U.S.)

ITT INC.❘ 2020 PROXY STATEMENT 9

Back to Contents

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE HIGHLIGHTS

We are committed to strong governance practices that protect the long-term interests of our shareholders and establish strong Board and management accountability. The “Corporate Governance and Related Matters” section beginning on page 12 describes our governance framework. We have adopted key corporate governance best practices, including:

WHAT WE DO
| Independent Chair |  |  | Annual Board and committee evaluation and self-assessments
| Highly independent and diverse Board |  |  | Active Board refreshment
| Annual election of directors |  |  | Director skill sets aligned with corporate strategy
| Majority voting for uncontested director elections |  |  | Formal limit on outside directorships
| Regular executive sessions of the Board and its committees |  |  | Meaningful stock ownership guidelines for directors
| Proxy access right |  |  | Formal director orientation and continuing education program
| Shareholder right to call special meetings |  |  | Proactive engagement with shareholders
| A policy prohibiting hedging and pledging of the Company’s securities |  |  |

SHAREHOLDER ENGAGEMENT AND RESPONSIVENESS

Since formalizing our engagement approach in 2017, we have reached out to shareholders representing over 50% of ITT’s outstanding shares annually to discuss governance, compensation and sustainability matters. In 2019 we built on this success and continued our robust annual shareholder engagement process, contacting shareholders representing nearly 70% of ITT’s outstanding shares and engaging with shareholders representing over 40% of such shares. The feedback we received was shared with the Board and members of senior management. Key themes from these conversations included corporate governance, executive compensation, and sustainability initiatives.

These conversations continue to inform our Board’s actions, including our approach to Board refreshment and diversity, our executive compensation practices, and our reporting efforts on sustainability topics. For example, the Sustainability Report that ITT published in February 2019, and the supplemental report that followed showing our three-year progress on environmental and social metrics, were shaped by our discussions with investors.

We encourage our registered shareholders to use the space provided on the proxy card to let us know your thoughts about ITT or to bring a particular matter to our attention. If you hold shares through an intermediary or received the proxy materials electronically, please feel free to write directly to us.

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION HIGHLIGHTS

The Compensation and Personnel Committee firmly believes in pay-for-performance and has structured the executive compensation program to align our executives’ interests with those of our shareholders.

Our CEO and other named executive officers (the “Named Executive Officers” or “NEOs”) have a significant amount of their target pay tied to an annual bonus and long-term incentives (“LTI”), which is “Pay at Risk” and dependent on ITT’s financial performance and stock price. The following graphics illustrate 2019 CEO payout under our Annual Incentive Plan (“AIP”) and payout with respect to 2017-2019 performance stock units (“PSUs”) that were granted in 2017, before Mr. Savi became CEO.

ITT INC.❘ 2020 PROXY STATEMENT 10

Back to Contents

2019 was Mr. Savi’s first year as CEO, however, his contributions in previous roles as Senior Vice President and President of Motion Technologies, and President and Chief Operating Officer of ITT, had a significant and direct impact on ITT’s performance over the past few years. The history of strong shareholder returns and adjusted EPS growth show meaningful alignment between ITT’s performance and the above target 2019 AIP and 2017 PSU award results.

See “2019 Annual Incentive Plan — 2019 AIP Performance Metrics and Weightings” for the definition of Adjusted EPS.

SUSTAINABILITY HIGHLIGHTS

At ITT we believe that improving our sustainability efforts creates value for our customers, employees, communities and shareholders. It helps us align to the values and emerging expectations of today’s world. In 2019, ITT issued a sustainability report which incorporated Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (“SASB”) metrics relevant to ITT, as requested by many of our shareholders in our engagement discussions. We also publish an annual supplemental report which includes our three-year progress on key environmental, social and governance (“ESG”) metrics.

ITT INC.❘ 2020 PROXY STATEMENT 11

Back to Contents

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AND RELATED MATTERS

INTRODUCTION

We strive to maintain the highest standards of corporate governance and ethical conduct. Maintaining full compliance with the laws, rules and regulations that govern our business, and reporting results with accuracy and transparency, are critical to those efforts. We monitor developments in the area of corporate governance, consider the feedback of our shareholders, and review our processes and procedures in light of this input. We also review federal and state laws affecting corporate governance, as well as rules and requirements of the New York Stock Exchange (the “NYSE”). We implement other corporate governance practices that we believe are in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders.

We also understand that corporate governance practices evolve over time, and we seek to maintain practices that provide the right framework for our operations at that time, that are of value to our shareholders and that positively aid in the governance of the Company.

The following sections provide an overview of ITT’s corporate governance structure and processes, including independence and other criteria we use in selecting director nominees, our leadership structure, and certain responsibilities and activities of the Board of Directors and its committees.

ITT’s key governance documents, including our Corporate Governance Principles (the “Principles”), and the charters for the Audit, Compensation and Personnel and Nominating and Governance Committees, are available on our website at www.itt.com/investors/corporate-governance. Our Code of Conduct is available on our website at www.itt.com. We have included our website addresses only as inactive textual references and do not intend them to be active links to our website. Our website is not incorporated into or a part of this Proxy Statement. Shareholders may also obtain copies of these documents free of charge by sending a written request to ITT Inc., 1133 Westchester Avenue, White Plains, NY 10604, Attention: Corporate Secretary.

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE PRINCIPLES

The Board of Directors has adopted the Principles, which govern the operations of the Board and its committees and guide the Board and ITT’s leadership team in the execution of their responsibilities. The Nominating and Governance Committee is responsible for overseeing the Principles. The Nominating and Governance Committee reviews the Principles at least annually and makes recommendations to the Board for updates in response to changing regulatory requirements, issues raised by shareholders or other stakeholders, changing regulatory requirements or otherwise as circumstances warrant. The Board may amend, waive, suspend or repeal any of the Principles at any time, with or without public notice, as it determines necessary or appropriate in the exercise of the Board’s judgment or fiduciary duties. As noted above, we have posted the Principles on our website at: www.itt.com/investors/ corporate-governance. The Principles include the following items concerning the Board:

■ | no director may stand for re-election after he or she has reached the age of 75;
■ | directors must be able to devote the requisite time for preparation and attendance at regularly scheduled Board and Committee meetings, as well as be able to participate in other matters necessary for good corporate governance;
■ | directors are limited to service on four public company boards (including the ITT Board). If the director serves as an active CEO of a public company, the director is limited to service on one public company board (including the ITT board) in addition to service on his or her own board;
■ | the CEO reports at least annually to the Board on succession planning and management development;
■ | the Board evaluates the performance of the CEO and other senior management personnel at least annually; and
■ | the Board maintains a process whereby the Board and its committees are subject to annual evaluation and self-assessment.

ITT INC.❘ 2020 PROXY STATEMENT 12

Back to Contents

OUR BOARD LEADERSHIP STRUCTURE

Our Board does not have a formal policy with respect to the separation of the roles of Chair of the Board and Chief Executive Officer. The Board believes that this is a matter that should be discussed and determined by the Board from time to time and that each of the possible leadership structures for a board of directors has its particular advantages and disadvantages. These factors must be considered in the context of the specific circumstances, giving due consideration to the individuals involved, the culture and performance of the Company, the needs of the business, fulfillment of the duties of the Board and the best interests of shareholders.

Although the Board may determine to combine the roles of Chair and Chief Executive Officer in the future, since 2011 the Board has determined that having separate individuals holding the Chair and Chief Executive Officer positions is the right leadership structure for the Company. This structure allows our Chief Executive Officer to focus on the operations of our business while the independent Chair focuses on leading the Board in its responsibilities. The Board most recently considered the appropriate leadership structure for the Board as part of the recently completed CEO transition and, taking into account feedback from our shareholders, confirmed that this separation continues to be in the best interests of ITT’s shareholders at this time as well as for the foreseeable future.

THE BOARD’S ROLE IN LEADERSHIP SUCCESSION PLANNING

The Board is actively engaged in our talent management program. The Compensation and Personnel Committee oversees the process for succession planning for the CEO and other senior executives and updates the full Board in its executive sessions. The Board holds a formal succession planning and talent review session each summer. These sessions include the identification and development of internal candidates and assessment of key capabilities, desired leadership skills, and the ability to influence our business and strategic direction consistent with our core values. As part of the succession planning process, the CEO, working with the Board, also reviews and maintains an emergency succession plan for the position of CEO.

Directors interact with ITT leaders through Board presentations and discussions, as well as through informal events and interactions throughout the year such as lunch, dinner, and small group and planned one-on-one sessions.

As previously disclosed by the Company on December 11, 2019, the Board appointed Mr. Lavin to serve as the non-executive Chairman of the Board, effective upon his election to the Board at the Company’s 2020 Annual Meeting of Shareholders. The current Chairman of the Board, Mr. MacInnis, will continue to serve as Chairman until such time. Mr. MacInnis will not stand for re-election to the Board at the 2020 Annual Meeting of Shareholders. The appointment of Mr. Lavin to serve as the next non-executive Chairman of ITT was made in anticipation of Mr. MacInnis’ retirement and to ensure a smooth transition.

DIRECTORS’ QUALIFICATION AND SELECTION PROCESS

BOARD MEMBERSHIP CRITERIA

The Nominating and Governance Committee regularly considers and reviews with the Board the appropriate skills and characteristics for Board members in fulfilling its responsibility to identify and recommend qualified candidates for membership on the Board.

The Corporate Governance Principles state that as part of the membership criteria for new Board members, individuals who are nominated are expected to have significant accomplishments and recognized business stature and possess attributes and experiences such as diversity, management skills and business, technological and international experience. The Nominating and Governance Committee’s top priority is therefore ensuring that the Board is composed of directors who bring diverse viewpoints and perspectives, exhibit a variety of skills, professional experience and backgrounds, and effectively represent the long-term interests of shareholders.

ITT INC.❘ 2020 PROXY STATEMENT 13

Back to Contents

Additional criteria for identifying and evaluating candidates for the Board include:

■ | personal qualities and characteristics, accomplishments and reputation in the business community;
■ | current knowledge and contacts in the Company’s business communities and industries;
■ | the fit of the individual’s skills and personality with those of other directors in building a Board that is effective, collegial and responsive;
■ | ability and willingness to commit adequate time to Board and committee matters;
■ | diversity of viewpoints, background, experience and other demographics;
■ | independence (including independence from the interests of a particular group of shareholders);
■ | absence of potential conflicts with our interests; and
■ | such other criteria as the Board may from time to time determine relevant.

DIRECTOR SKILLS

Our director nominees possess relevant experience, skills and qualifications which contribute to a well-functioning Board that effectively oversees the Company’s strategy and management. All of our director nominees bring to the Board a wealth of executive leadership experience derived from their diverse professional backgrounds and areas of expertise. As a group, they have global industrial and financial expertise, public company board experience and sound business acumen.

BOARD DIVERSITY

The Board actively seeks to consider diverse candidates for membership on the Board when it has a vacancy to fill and includes diversity as a specific factor when conducting any search for candidates. In identifying and evaluating candidates for the Board, the Nominating and Governance Committee considers the diversity of the Board, including diversity of skills, experience and backgrounds, as well as ethnic and gender diversity. We believe that our Board nominees appropriately reflect a diversity of skills, of professional, gender, ethnic and personal backgrounds, and of experience.

BOARD TENURE

The Board also strives to maintain an appropriate balance of tenure and turnover among directors. The Board believes that there are significant benefits from the valuable experience and familiarity with the Company and its people and processes that longer-tenured directors bring, as well as significant benefits from the fresh perspective and ideas brought by new directors. We believe that our Board strikes the right balance of longer serving and newer directors.

PROCESS FOR IDENTIFYING AND SELECTING NEW BOARD MEMBERS

The Nominating and Governance Committee identifies director candidates through a variety of sources including an independent search firm, personal references, and business contacts.

Shareholders who wish to recommend candidates may contact the Nominating and Governance Committee in the manner described in “Communication with the Board of Directors.” Shareholder nominations must be made according to the procedures required by our Amended and Restated By-laws (the “By-laws”) and described in this Proxy Statement under the heading “Information about the Proxy Statement & Voting.” Shareholder recommended candidates and shareholder nominees whose nominations comply with these procedures and who meet the criteria referred to above will be evaluated by the Nominating and Governance Committee in the same manner as other nominees.

ITT INC.❘ 2020 PROXY STATEMENT 14

Back to Contents

A key component to the nomination (and re-nomination) process is the Nominating and Governance Committee’s consideration of the results of the Board’s evaluation process. The results generated from this evaluation process include nominee attributes and experiences that will individually and collectively complement the existing Board, taking into account the Board’s needs for expertise and recognizing that the Company’s businesses and operations are diverse and global in nature.

Prior to recommending nominees for election as directors, the Nominating and Governance Committee, and then the full Board of Directors, engages in a deliberative process and considers the following to ensure that the nominee will contribute to an effective Board of Directors:

■ | the nominee’s fit with the membership criteria discussed above;
■ | the nominee’s skills and attributes and overall complement to the skills matrix discussed above; and
■ | the diversity that the nominee will add to the Board.

Biographical information for each candidate for election as a director is evaluated and candidates for election participate in interviews with existing Board members and management. Each candidate is subject to thorough background checks and nominees must meet the requirements of the Company’s By-laws and the Corporate Governance Principles.

BOARD AND COMMITTEE EVALUATION PROCESS

We recognize the critical role that Board and committee evaluations play in ensuring the effective functioning of our Board. Our Board annually evaluates the performance of the Board and its committees. As part of the Board’s self-assessment process, directors complete questionnaires that consider various topics related to Board composition, structure, effectiveness, and responsibilities, as well as the overall mix of director skills, experience, and backgrounds. As set forth in its charter, the Nominating and Governance Committee oversees the Board and committee evaluation process. Annually, the Nominating and Governance Committee reviews the questionnaires and the process and considers whether changes are recommended.

TOPICS CONSIDERED DURING THE BOARD AND COMMITTEE SELF-ASSESSMENTS INCLUDE:

Board and Committee Operations |  | Board Performance |  | Committee Performance
■ | Board and committee membership, including director skills, background, expertise and diversity |  | ■ | Key areas of focus for the Board |  | ■ | Performance of committee duties under committee charters
■ | Committee structure and process, including keeping the full Board abreast of committee matters |  | ■ | Oversight of the Company’s strategy |  | ■ | Effectiveness of management support for committees
■ | Access to management, experts and internal and external resources |  | ■ | Effectiveness of risk oversight |  | ■ | Identification of topics that should receive more attention and discussion, particularly emerging risk areas
■ | Materials and information, including the quality and quantity of information received |  | ■ | Performance of Board Chair |  | ■ | Performance of committee chairs
■ | Conduct of meetings, including encouragement of and time allocated for candid dialogue |  |  |  |  |  |

The Company’s Corporate Secretary aggregates and summarizes all of the directors’ responses to the questionnaires, highlighting comments and year-over-year trends. Responses are not attributed to specific Board or committee members to promote candor. These summaries are shared with the Board and committee members to inform their review and discussion. The Chair of the Nominating and Governance Committee, with support from the Corporate Secretary, leads a discussion of the Board and committee results at the Nominating and Governance Committee meeting as well as with the full Board. Each committee chair, with support from the Corporate Secretary, leads a discussion at their committee meeting of their individual assessments. As a result of these discussions, an action plan is created and practices are updated based on the self-assessment observations and suggestions. As an outcome of these discussions, directors share relevant feedback with management and suggest changes or areas of improvement or focus.

Following the in-person review of the results of the Board and committee self-assessments, our independent Chair has individual one-on-one discussions with each director to elicit any further information about their views on the functioning of the

ITT INC.❘ 2020 PROXY STATEMENT 15

Back to Contents

Board and its committees. Feedback from those discussions is also incorporated into the overall action plan.

Examples of changes made in response to the self-assessment process over the last several years include:

■ | prioritizing diversity in the next director search;
■ | increased Board exposure both formally and informally to key executives;
■ | additional reserved time for “Board only” discussions to continue to foster openness and cohesiveness among the Board; and
■ | a coordinated director education schedule to provide additional education on relevant topics as part of regularly scheduled meetings.

The Board of Directors has considered whether to engage an independent third party to conduct or facilitate the Board self-assessments and has to-date concluded that an independent review is not necessary. The Board has agreed that it will consider this as needed.

The results of the self-assessment process in 2019 confirmed the Board’s belief that the Board and its committees are currently operating effectively.

DIRECTOR ORIENTATION AND CONTINUING EDUCATION

As part of ITT’s director orientation program, new directors participate in one-on-one introductory meetings with members of ITT’s leadership team and other functional leaders. This director orientation familiarizes the directors with our business and strategic plans, significant financial, accounting and risk management issues, human resources matters, our compliance programs and other controls, policies, and procedures. The orientation also addresses Board procedures, our Principles and our Board committee charters. Finally, it provides directors with the opportunity to meet with our officers and other key members of senior management.

The Company endeavors to provide ongoing director education throughout the year. Our annual strategy session, where senior management presents the strategic plans for each of the businesses and the Company as a whole, is one component of that ongoing education. We aim to periodically hold the annual strategy session at an ITT facility in order to increase the Board’s understanding of the Company’s people, operations, product lines, and overall business. Our senior management also presents topics throughout the year to the Board in order to increase their understanding of the Company’s business operations, strategies, risks and opportunities.

Directors may enroll in external continuing education programs at ITT’s expense on topics associated with a director’s service on a public company board in order to provide a forum for them to maintain their insight into leading governance practices, exchange ideas with peers, and keep current their skills and understanding of their duties as directors.

SHAREHOLDER ENGAGEMENT

Our Board values the views of our shareholders, and the feedback we receive from shareholders is a key input to our corporate governance, executive compensation, and sustainability practices.

ENGAGEMENT PROGRAM

Since formalizing our engagement approach in 2017, we have reached out annually to shareholders owning over 50% of ITT’s outstanding shares to discuss governance matters. In 2019, we expanded our outreach to cover shareholders representing nearly 70% of ITT’s outstanding shares, and engaged with shareholders representing over 40% of such shares. The feedback we received was shared with the Board and members of senior management.

We believe it is important for the Company to have a direct line of communication with shareholders so that the Board and management are better able to assess our policies and practices continually.

ITT INC.❘ 2020 PROXY STATEMENT 16

Back to Contents

FALL 2019 ENGAGEMENT FEEDBACK

An overview of the specific areas of focus for our shareholders during these meetings is provided in the table below:

Shareholder Engagement Outreach Efforts
Percent of Shares Outstanding Contacted: 69% | Percent of Shares Outstanding Engaged: 43%
Specific Areas of Focus and Feedback

Corporate Governance | Executive Compensation | Sustainability
Board Diversity & Refreshment | Compensation Program | Sustainability Reporting
■ | Discussed how the Board’s evaluation process and age limit support thoughtful refreshment | ■ | Shareholders understood the relevance of our compensation program metrics to our business strategy and acknowledged our link between pay and performance | ■ | Shareholders appreciated ITT’s recent reporting efforts, including SASB- aligned metrics
■ | Shareholders recognized ITT’s commitment to Board diversity, including gender, race/ethnicity, age, geography, and business experience | ■ | Shareholder supported changes we made in 2019, including: (1) increasing the percentage of PSUs that executive officers receive from LTI from 50% to 60% and, (2) increasing stock ownership guidelines of our executive officers | ■ | Shareholders encouraged ITT to consider setting specific sustainability-related goals
■ | Shareholders appreciated ITT’s smooth leadership succession process, including the 2019 CEO transition and upcoming independent Chair transition | ■ | Shareholders supported the Board’s rationale for considering an AIP design change in 2020 to increase the weighting of the individual component from 10% to 20% of the total, and certain shareholders suggested potential enhancements to disclosure to accompany this change | ■ | Discussed investors’ views on various data sources and emerging reporting standards
| Governance |  |  |  | Board Oversight of Sustainability
■ | Shareholders appreciated ITT’s robust corporate governance profile and practices, including our long-standing independent Chair role |  |  | ■ | Discussed the Nominating & Governance Committee’s oversight of ESG risks impacting ITT
|  |  |  | ■ | Discussed the Compensation & Personnel Committee’s focus on cultivating an innovative, diverse and inclusive workplace that engages and energizes people

RECENT BOARD ACTIONS

■ | Board Refreshment: Our approach to Board refreshment and diversity continues to be informed by our shareholders’ perspectives, and following recent additions to our Board that further enhanced our Board’s skill sets and diversity, we are implementing a transition of the independent Chair role that will occur at the 2020 Annual Meeting.
■ | Compensation: In response to shareholder feedback, in 2019 we increased the weighting of PSUs in our LTI award from 50% to 60%. Starting in 2020, we have increased the weighting of the individual component in our AIP to further align pay with ITT’s long-term business strategy and enhance individual accountability.
■ | Sustainability: We continue to evolve and enhance our sustainability practices and disclosure, taking into account multiple years of shareholder feedback. Our 2019 Sustainability Report included metrics reported in accordance with SASB, and our 2019 supplemental report included three-year progress on environmental metrics and introduced baseline metrics around workplace diversity. We plan to issue a 2020 supplemental report later this year.

We encourage shareholders to continue to engage with us and let us know their thoughts about ITT or to bring any matters to our attention. Please feel free to write directly to us at ITT Inc., 1133 Westchester Avenue, White Plains, NY 10604. Attention: Corporate Secretary.

ITT INC.❘ 2020 PROXY STATEMENT 17

Back to Contents

BOARD AND COMMITTEE MEETINGS AND MEMBERSHIP

The Board and its committees meet throughout the year on a set schedule, and also hold special meetings and act by written consent from time to time as appropriate. Under the Principles, directors are expected to attend all meetings of the Board and all meetings of the committees of which they are members. Members may attend by telephone or video conference, although in-person attendance at regularly scheduled meetings is strongly encouraged. The Board held 9 meetings during the 2019 fiscal year, and there were 16 meetings of standing committees. All directors attended at least 75% of the aggregate of all meetings of the Board and standing committees on which they served. It is Company practice that all directors attend our annual meetings. All directors who were on the Board at that time attended our 2019 annual meeting of shareholders either in person or telephonically.

The Board has an Audit Committee, a Compensation and Personnel Committee, and a Nominating and Governance Committee. The following table summarizes the current membership of each Committee:

Name | Audit | Compensation and Personnel | Nominating and Governance
Orlando D. Ashford |  |  |
Geraud Darnis |  |  |
Donald DeFosset, Jr. |  |  |
Nicholas C. Fanandakis |  |  |
Christina Gold* |  |  |
Richard P. Lavin |  |  |
Mario Longhi |  |  |
Frank T. MacInnis* |  |  |
Rebecca A. McDonald |  |  |
Timothy H. Powers |  |  |
Luca Savi |  |  |
Cheryl L. Shavers |  |  |
Sabrina Soussan |  |  |

* | Mr. MacInnis and Ms. Gold are not standing for re-election in 2020.
| Chair

ITT INC.❘ 2020 PROXY STATEMENT 18

Back to Contents

BOARD AND COMMITTEE ROLES IN OVERSIGHT OF RISK

| BOARD OF DIRECTORS |
| Oversees Major Risks |
| ■ | The Board of Directors is charged with oversight of the Company’s risk management policies and practices with the objective of ensuring that appropriate risk management systems are employed throughout the Company. ITT faces a broad array of risks, including market, operational, strategic, legal, political, international, and financial risks. The Board monitors overall corporate performance, the integrity of the Company’s financial controls and the effectiveness of its legal compliance and enterprise risk management programs, risk governance practices, and risk mitigation efforts. The Board receives reports from management on risk matters in the context of the Company’s annual strategy session and strategic planning reviews, the annual operating plan and budget reviews and business reports, and other updates provided at Board meetings. |

| Audit Committee |  |  |  | Compensation and Personnel Committee |  |  |  | Nominating and Governance Committee |
| Primary Risk Oversight |  |  |  | Primary Risk Oversight |  |  |  | Primary Risk Oversight |
| ■ | Oversees ITT’s policies on risk assessment and management, and oversees risks related to the Company’s financial statements, the financial reporting process, accounting matters, and other areas of significant financial risk. Also assesses risks related to legal and regulatory matters that may have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements and cybersecurity. |  |  |  | ■ | Oversees risks related to compensation-related matters, management succession planning and corporate culture. For additional information regarding the Compensation and Personnel Committee’s role in evaluating the impact of risk on executive compensation, see page 51 of the Compensation Discussion & Analysis. |  |  |  | ■ | Oversees ITT’s overall risk management program. Also evaluates risks in connection with the Company’s corporate governance structures and processes and risks related to other primarily nonfinancial matters (for example, business continuity planning and sustainability). |

| MANAGEMENT |
| ■ | The Company’s internal audit function has primary oversight responsibilities over risk management and engages with other members of management to monitor and analyze various risks. Each Board committee receives regular reports from management within the relevant expertise of that committee. For example, the Compensation and Personnel Committee reviews and assesses compensation and incentive program risks to ensure that the Company’s compensation programs encourage innovation and balance appropriate business risks and rewards without encouraging risk-taking behaviors that may have a material adverse effect on the Company, and it receives an annual report from management evaluating these risks. The Board and each Committee meets in executive sessions and with key management personnel and outside advisors when deemed necessary. |

ITT INC.❘ 2020 PROXY STATEMENT 19

Back to Contents

OVERVIEW OF COMMITTEES

The charters of each of the Audit, Compensation and Personnel and Nominating and Governance Committees conform with the applicable NYSE listing standards, and each committee reviews its charter at least annually, and as regulatory developments and business circumstances warrant. Each of the committees considers revisions to its respective charter from time to time to reflect evolving best practices. The descriptions below of the roles and responsibilities of each of the committees of the Board are qualified by reference to the complete committee charters, which are available on our website at www.itt.com/investors/corporate-governance.

AUDIT COMMITTEE

Attendance | Responsibilities
Meetings Held in 2019: 8 Committee Members Timothy H. Powers (Chair) Geraud Darnis Donald DeFosset, Jr. Nicholas C. Fanandakis Richard P. Lavin Sabrina Soussan | Purpose: assist the Board of Directors in fulfilling its responsibility to oversee management’s conduct of the financial reporting process. The Audit Committee is primarily responsible for: ■ reviewing and discussing with management and the independent auditor the annual audited and quarterly unaudited financial statements and approving those financial statements for inclusion in the Company’s public filings; ■ reviewing and overseeing the Company’s selection and application of accounting principles and matters relating to the Company’s internal controls and disclosure controls and procedures; ■ overseeing the Company’s compliance with legal and regulatory requirements, including reviewing the effect of regulatory and accounting initiatives on the Company’s financial statements; ■ overseeing the structure and scope of the Company’s internal audit function; and ■ overseeing the Company’s policies on risk assessment and management. The Audit Committee is also directly responsible for the selection and oversight of the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, including determining the firm’s qualifications, independence, scope of responsibility and compensation.
Audit Committee Report, Page 35

The Audit Committee has established policies and procedures for the pre-approval of all services by our independent registered public accounting firm. The Audit Committee also has established procedures for the receipt, retention and treatment, on a confidential basis, of complaints received regarding accounting, internal controls and auditing matters. Additional details on the role of the Audit Committee may be found in “Ratification of the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (Proxy Item No. 2)” later in this Proxy Statement.

The Board of Directors has determined that each member of the Audit Committee is financially literate and independent, as defined by the rules of the SEC and the NYSE’s listing standard, as well as independent under the Principles. Although more than one member of the Audit Committee satisfies the relevant requirements, the Board of Directors has identified Timothy H. Powers as the Audit Committee financial expert. The Board of Directors has evaluated the performance of the Audit Committee consistent with regulatory requirements.

ITT INC.❘ 2020 PROXY STATEMENT 20

Back to Contents

COMPENSATION AND PERSONNEL COMMITTEE

Attendance | Responsibilities
Meetings Held in 2019: 4 Committee Members Richard P. Lavin (Chair) Orlando D. Ashford Christina A. Gold (will not stand for re-election in 2020) Mario Longhi Rebecca A. McDonald | Purpose: provide oversight of the compensation and benefits provided to employees of the Company. The Compensation and Personnel Committee reviews and approves the Company’s overall compensation philosophy and oversees the administration of the Company’s executive compensation and benefit programs, policies and practices. Its responsibilities also include: ■ establishing annual performance objectives, evaluating performance and approving individual compensation actions for the Chief Executive Officer and other executive officers; ■ reviewing and discussing the Company’s talent review and development process, succession planning process for executive officers (including, the CEO) and other senior mangement roles and aspects of culture and diversity for the Company; ■ approving the Compensation Discussion and Analysis included in the Company’s annual proxy statement; and ■ reviewing and approving the Company’s peer companies and data sources for purposes of evaluating our compensation competitiveness and the mix of compensation.
Compensation and Personnel Committee Report, Page 67

The Board of Directors has determined that each member of the Compensation and Personnel Committee is independent, as defined by the rules of the SEC and the NYSE’s listing standard, as well as independent under the Principles and Section 2.10 of the Company’s By-laws. In addition, each committee member is a “non-employee director” as defined in Rule 16b-3 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”). The Board of Directors has evaluated the performance of the Compensation and Personnel Committee consistent with regulatory requirements.

NOMINATING AND GOVERNANCE COMMITTEE

Attendance | Responsibilities
Meetings Held in 2019: 4 Committee Members Donald DeFosset, Jr. (Chair) Orlando D. Ashford Geraud Darnis Frank T. MacInnis (will not stand for re-election in 2020) Timothy H. Powers Cheryl L. Shavers | Purpose: ensure that the Board of Directors is appropriately constituted to meet its fiduciary obligations to shareholders of the Company. The Nominating and Governance Committee oversees the practices, policies and procedures of the Board and its committees. Responsibilities include: ■ evaluating the size, composition, governance and structure of the Board and the qualifications, compensation and retirement age of directors; ■ identifying, evaluating and proposing nominees for election to the Board; ■ considering the independence and possible conflicts of interest of directors and executive officers and ensuring compliance with applicable laws and NYSE listing standards; and ■ overseeing the Company’s overall enterprise risk management program. The Nominating and Governance Committee is charged with ■ overseeing the self-evaluations of the Board and its committees; ■ reviewing the Principles; ■ reviewing material related party transactions in accordance with our Related Party Transactions Policy; and ■ monitoring our directors’ outside engagements and administering our director resignation procedures when there is a change in a director’s employment status. The Committee also maintains an informed status on the Company’s sustainability initiatives and on activities involving community relations and philanthropy.

ITT INC.❘ 2020 PROXY STATEMENT 21

Back to Contents

The Board of Directors has determined that each member of the Nominating and Governance Committee is independent, as defined by the rules of the SEC and the NYSE’s listing standard, as well as independent under the Principles. The Board of Directors has evaluated the performance of the Nominating and Governance Committee consistent with regulatory requirements.

As stated above, the Nominating and Governance Committee evaluates the compensation program for the non-management directors and makes recommendations to the Board regarding their compensation. The Nominating and Governance Committee has retained Pay Governance LLC (“Pay Governance”) as an independent consultant for this purpose. Pay Governance’s responsibilities include providing market comparison data on non-management director compensation at peer companies, tracking trends in non-management director compensation practices, and advising the Nominating and Governance Committee regarding the components and levels of non-management director compensation. The Nominating and Governance Committee is not aware of any conflict of interest on the part of Pay Governance arising from these services or any other factor that would impair Pay Governance’s independence. Executive officers do not play any role in either determining or recommending non-management director compensation.

EXECUTIVE SESSIONS OF DIRECTORS

Agendas for meetings of the Board of Directors include regularly scheduled executive sessions led by the Board’s non-executive Chair for the independent directors to meet without management present. Board members have access to our employees outside of Board meetings, and the Board encourages directors to visit different Company sites and events periodically and meet with local management at those sites and events, either as part of a regularly scheduled Board meeting or otherwise.

HEDGING AND PLEDGING

Our directors and certain employees (including executive officers) are prohibited from hedging and speculative trading in and out of the Company’s securities, including short sales and leverage transactions, such as puts, calls, and listed and unlisted options.

We also prohibit our directors and certain employees from pledging Company securities as collateral for a loan.

DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

The Board of Directors, through the Nominating and Governance Committee, conducts an annual review of the independence of its members. With the assistance of legal counsel to the Company, the Nominating and Governance Committee has reviewed the applicable standards for Board and committee member independence, as well as the standards established by the Principles. A summary of the answers to annual questionnaires completed by each of the directors and a report of transactions with director-affiliated entities are also made available to the Nominating and Governance Committee to enable its comprehensive independence review. On the basis of this review, the Nominating and Governance Committee has delivered a report to the full Board of Directors, and the Board has made its independence determinations based upon the committee’s report and the supporting information.

Under NYSE listing standards, an independent director must not have any material relationship with the Company, either directly or as a partner, shareholder or officer of an organization that has a relationship with the Company. The NYSE requirements pertaining to director independence also include a series of objective tests, such as the requirement that the director is not an employee of the Company and has not engaged in various types of business dealings with the Company. The Board also considers whether directors have any relationship that would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director. The SEC has a separate independence requirement for Audit Committee members that overlays the NYSE requirements. The NYSE also requires directors that serve on compensation committees to satisfy additional independence requirements specific to that service.

The Board of Directors has determined that Mr. Savi is not “independent” because of his employment as Chief Executive Officer of the Company. The Board of Directors has reviewed all relationships between the Company and each other member of the Board of Directors and has affirmatively determined that all of the members of the Board other than Mr. Savi are “independent” pursuant to the applicable listing standards of the NYSE. None of these directors were disqualified from “independent” status under the objective tests set forth in the NYSE standards. In assessing independence under the subjective relationships

ITT INC.❘ 2020 PROXY STATEMENT 22

Back to Contents

test described above, the Board of Directors took into account the criteria for disqualification set forth in the NYSE’s objective tests, and reviewed and discussed additional information provided by each director and the Company with regard to each director’s business and personal activities as they may relate to the Company and its management. Based on the foregoing, as required by the NYSE, the Board made the subjective determination as to each of these directors that no material relationships with the Company exist and no relationships exist which, in the opinion of the Board of Directors, would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of such director. The Board also determined that the current members of the Audit Committee and of the Compensation and Personnel Committee meet the applicable SEC and NYSE listing standard independence requirements with respect to membership on such committees.

In making its independence determinations, the Board considered transactions occurring since the beginning of the Company’s 2017 fiscal year between the Company and entities associated with the directors or members of their immediate family. All identified transactions that appear to relate to the Company and a person or entity with a known connection to a director were presented to the Board of Directors for consideration. The Board also considered in its analysis the Company’s contributions to tax-exempt organizations with respect to each of the non-management directors. In making its subjective determination that each non-management director is independent, the Board considered the transactions in the context of the NYSE objective standards, and special standards established by the SEC for members of audit and compensation committees. In each case, the Board determined that, because of the nature of the director’s relationship with the entity or the amount involved in the transaction, the relationship did not impair the director’s independence. The Company did not make any contributions to any tax exempt organizations in which any non-management director serves as an executive officer within the past three fiscal years where such contributions exceeded the greater of $1 million or 2% of such organization’s consolidated gross revenues.

CODE OF CONDUCT

The Company has also adopted the ITT Code of Conduct which applies to all employees, including the Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer and, where applicable, to its non-management directors. We disclose on our website any changes or waivers from the Code of Conduct for the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Principal Accounting Officer, our non-management directors and other executive officers. In addition, the Company will disclose within four business days any substantive changes in or waivers of the Code of Conduct granted to our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer, or persons performing similar functions. We intend to do this by posting such information on our website as set forth above rather than by filing a Form 8-K with the SEC.

The Company has established a confidential ethics phone line and website to respond to employees’ questions and reports of ethical concerns. Also, the Audit Committee has established a policy with procedures to receive, retain and treat complaints received by the Company regarding accounting, internal controls or auditing matters, and to allow for the confidential, anonymous submission by employees of concerns regarding accounting or auditing matters.

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER PARTICIPATION

None of the members of the Compensation and Personnel Committee during 2019 or as of the date of this Proxy Statement has been an officer or employee of the Company and no executive officer of the Company served on the compensation committee or board of any company that employed any member of our Compensation and Personnel Committee or Board of Directors.

ITT INC.❘ 2020 PROXY STATEMENT 23

Back to Contents

COMMUNICATION WITH THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

Shareholders and other interested parties may contact any of our directors (including the non-executive Chair), a committee of the Board, the Board’s non-management directors as a group, or the Board as a whole by writing to them c/o ITT Inc., 1133 Westchester Avenue, White Plains, NY 10604, Attention: Corporate Secretary. Communications are distributed to the Board, or to any individual director(s), as appropriate under the facts and circumstances. Junk mail, advertisements, product inquiries or complaints, resumes, spam and surveys are not forwarded to the Board. Material that is threatening, unduly hostile or similarly inappropriate will also not be forwarded, although any non-management director may request that any communications that have been excluded be made available.

POLICIES FOR APPROVING RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

The Board has adopted a written Related Party Transaction Policy (the “Policy”) that addresses the reporting, review and approval or ratification of transactions with related parties. The Policy covers (but is not limited to) those related party transactions and relationships required to be disclosed under Item 404(a) of the SEC’s Regulation S-K, and applies to each director or executive officer of the Company, any nominee for election as a director of the Company, any security holder who is known to the Company to own of record or beneficially more than 5% of any class of the Company’s voting securities, and any immediate family member of any of the foregoing persons (each, a “Related Party”).

The Company recognizes that transactions with Related Parties may involve potential or actual conflicts of interest and pose the risk that they may be, or be perceived to have been, based on considerations other than the Company’s best interests. Accordingly, as a general matter, the Company seeks to avoid such transactions. However, the Company recognizes that in some circumstances transactions between Related Parties and the Company may be incidental to the normal course of business, may provide an opportunity that is in the best interests of the Company to pursue, or may not otherwise be inconsistent with the best interests of the Company. In other cases it may be inefficient for the Company to pursue an alternative transaction. The Policy therefore is not designed to prohibit Related Party transactions; rather, it is designed to provide for timely internal reporting of such transactions and appropriate review, oversight and public disclosure of them. The Policy supplements the provisions of our Code of Conduct concerning potential conflict of interest situations. Under the Policy, an amendment to an arrangement that is considered a Related Party transaction is, unless clearly incidental in nature, considered a separate Related Party transaction.

The Policy provides for the Nominating and Governance Committee to review all Related Party transactions and, wherever possible, to approve such transactions in advance of any such transaction being given effect. In connection with approving or ratifying a Related Party transaction, the Nominating and Governance Committee considers, in light of the relevant facts and circumstances, whether or not the transaction is in, or consistent with, the best interests of the Company, including, as applicable, consideration of the following factors:

■ the position within or relationship of the Related Party with the Company;

■ the materiality of the transaction to the Related Party and the Company, including the dollar value of the transaction, without regard to profit or loss;

■ the business purpose for and reasonableness of the transaction, taken in the context of the alternatives available to the Company for attaining the purposes of the transaction;

■ whether the transaction is comparable to a transaction that could be available on an arms-length basis or is on terms that the Company offers generally to persons who are not Related Parties;

■ whether the transaction is in the ordinary course of our business and was proposed and considered in the ordinary course of business; and

■ the effect of the transaction on our business and operations, including on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting and system of disclosure controls or procedures, and any additional conditions or controls (including reporting and review requirements) that should be applied to such transaction.

The Policy provides standing pre-approval for certain types of transactions that the Nominating and Governance Committee has determined do not pose a significant risk of conflict of interest, either because a Related Party would not have a material interest in a transaction of that type or due to the nature, size and/or degree of significance to the Company. The Policy is re-evaluated periodically.

ITT INC.❘ 2020 PROXY STATEMENT 24

Back to Contents

CORPORATE RESPONSIBILITY AND SUSTAINABILITY

At ITT, we know that improving our sustainability efforts creates value for our customers, employees, communities and shareholders. It helps us align to the values and emerging expectations of today’s world.

The Board also understands that sustainability is a key focus for investors and takes investor feedback on sustainability seriously. We continue to evaluate which ESG factors pose the most material risks to the Company and create the strongest opportunities to enhance our bottom line and sustain long-term financial value.

ITT uses discussions with shareholders to better understand how investors view this topic, including emerging reporting standards, the various data sources available, and peer reporting.

We also use these shareholder engagement opportunities to discuss the Company’s current sustainability focus areas and recent developments. Our 2019 Sustainability Report was informed by those discussions with investors. The Sustainability Report incorporated the SASB metrics relevant to the Company, as requested by many of our shareholders in our engagement discussions. We also publish an annual supplemental report which includes our three-year progress on key environmental and social metrics.

Our governance processes and policies are designed to provide appropriate oversight of sustainability and inform our Board about significant ESG issues impacting the Company. These policies and processes, as well as areas of focus most relevant given our business and industry, are informed by proactive engagement with our shareholders as well as other stakeholders, including the SASB.

BOARD OF DIRECTORS

Nominating and Governance Committee Provides oversight of sustainability in general, focused on assessing the effectiveness of our Environment, Safety, Health & Security (“ESH&S”) program |  | Compensation and Personnel Committee Oversees compensation and benefits for our executive officers, including recruitment and development of diverse talent necessary to ensure ITT’s success

ESH&S GROUP
Internal team that drives overall approach to Environment & Safety matters, establishes corporate-wide processes and goals, and periodically reports to the Board

The Nominating and Governance and the Compensation and Personnel Committees have primary responsibility for sustainability-related topics. The Board also receives periodic reports from our internal ESH&S group in order to stay apprised of the Company’s overall approach to these matters.

ITT INC.❘ 2020 PROXY STATEMENT 25

Back to Contents

ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

(PROXY ITEM NO. 1)

ELECTION PROCEDURES

Each director must be elected by a majority of the votes cast by the shareholders represented in person or by proxy at the Annual Meeting. A “majority of the votes cast” means that the number of votes cast “for” a director must exceed the number of votes cast “against” that director (with abstentions and broker non-votes not counted as votes cast with respect to that director). In a contested election for directors (an election in which the number of nominees for election as directors is greater than the number of directors to be elected), the vote standard would be a plurality of votes cast.

In accordance with our By-laws and the Principles, the Board will only nominate director candidates who agree to tender an irrevocable resignation promptly following their failure to receive the required vote for re-election in an uncontested election. In addition, the Board will fill director vacancies and new directorships only with candidates who agree to tender the same form of resignation promptly following their appointment to the Board.

If an incumbent director fails to receive the required vote for re-election in an uncontested election and submits his or her resignation to the Chair of the Board or the Corporate Secretary, then the Nominating and Governance Committee (or the equivalent committee then in existence) shall promptly consider the resignation and all relevant facts and circumstances concerning any vote and the best interests of the Company and its shareholders. After such consideration, the Nominating and Governance Committee will make a recommendation to the Board regarding whether the resignation should be accepted or rejected, or whether any other action should be taken. The Board will act on the Committee’s recommendation no later than its next regularly scheduled Board meeting (after certification of the shareholder vote) or within 90 days after certification of the shareholder vote, whichever is earlier, and the Board will promptly publicly disclose its decision and the reasons for its decision.

Each nominee elected as a director will continue in office until the earlier of the 2021 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, his or her successor having been duly elected and qualified, or his or her death, resignation or removal.

The 11 nominees for election to the Board in 2020 have agreed to serve if elected, and management has no reason to believe that such nominees will be unavailable to serve. In the event that any of the nominees is unable or declines to serve as a director at the time of the Annual Meeting, then the persons named as proxies may vote for a substitute nominee chosen by the present Board to fill the vacancy. Alternatively, the Board may reduce the size of the Board of Directors. The individuals named as proxies in the proxy card intend to vote your proxy (if you are a shareholder of record) FOR the election of each of these nominees, unless you indicate otherwise on the proxy card.

2020 DIRECTOR NOMINEES

Eleven members of our Board are standing for election to hold office until the 2021 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.

We believe our 2020 director nominees evidence our commitment to maintain an appropriate balance of tenure, turnover, diversity and skills on the Board. Of the 11 directors who are nominees for election at the Annual Meeting, three are female, three are racially or ethnically diverse, and four are citizens of a non-U.S. country (in some cases, in addition to the U.S.). As discussed in detail in our nominees’ biographies, the nominees come from diverse professional backgrounds and industries, including manufacturing, finance and technology. Each of our 2020 director nominees was recommended for election by the Nominating and Governance Committee, and such recommendation was approved unanimously by the Board.

ITT INC.❘ 2020 PROXY STATEMENT 26

Back to Contents

The principal occupation and certain other biographical information about the nominees is set forth on the following pages.

ORLANDO D. ASHFORD
Age: 51 Director since: December 2011 President of Holland America Line |  | CAREER:
| Orlando D. Ashford has served as the President of Holland America Line, a division of Carnival Corporation, since December 2014. Previously, Mr. Ashford was the President of the Talent business segment at Mercer, a global consulting leader and subsidiary of Marsh & McLennan Companies (“Marsh”). From 2008 to 2012, Mr. Ashford was the Senior Vice President, Chief Human Resources and Communications Officer for Marsh. Prior to joining Marsh in 2008, Mr. Ashford served as Group Director of Human Resources for Eurasia and Africa for the Coca-Cola Company and as Vice President of Global Human Resources Strategy and Organizational Development for Motorola, Inc. He has also held leadership positions with Mercer Delta Consulting, Ameritech and Andersen Consulting. Mr. Ashford serves on the board of directors for the Virgina Mason Medical Center, the Seattle chapter of the Positive Coaching Alliance and Year Up.
| REASONS FOR ELECTION TO THE BOARD OF ITT:
| In considering Mr. Ashford for director of the Company, the Board considered his expertise in addressing talent, culture and human capital issues at the executive level, as well as his significant experience in multinational organizations, providing experience and skills relevant to the Company’s international sales operations.
| BOARD COMMITTEES:
| ■ Compensation and Personnel Committee
| ■ Nominating and Governance Committee

GERAUD DARNIS
Age: 60 Director since: October 2015 Former President & CEO of UTC Building & Industrial Systems |  | CAREER:
| Geraud Darnis served as the President & Chief Executive Officer of UTC Building & Industrial Systems, the world’s largest provider of high-technology building systems, whose brands include Otis, Carrier, Chubb, Kidde and Automated Logic from September 2013 to December 2015. UTC Building & Industrial Systems is a unit of United Technologies Corporation. Mr. Darnis served as the President and Chief Executive Officer of UTC Climate, Controls and Security from September 2011 to September 2013. In 2001, he served briefly as President of UTC Power before being named President of Carrier, a position he held until 2011 when Carrier and UTC Fire & Security were combined into UTC Climate, Controls & Security. Prior to 2001, Mr. Darnis held a number of general management and financial positions at UTC in Latin America, Europe and Asia. Mr. Darnis currently serves as the non-executive Chairman of Miliken & Company Inc. and a member of its Human Resources and Compensation, Finance, and Nominating & Governance Committees. Mr. Darnis also served as a member on the Air-Conditioning, Heating and Refrigeration Institute from 2003 to 2006, including Chairman from November 2004 to November 2005, and then as an advisory member of the Executive Committee from 2007 to 2014.
| REASONS FOR ELECTION TO THE BOARD OF ITT:
| In considering Mr. Darnis for director of the Company, the Board considered his significant management experience as president of a major operating unit at a large global manufacturing company and his wide-ranging expertise in a variety of industries in which the Company operates, including industrial and aerospace.
| BOARD COMMITTEES:
| ■ Audit Committee
| ■ Nominating and Governance Committee

ITT INC.❘ 2020 PROXY STATEMENT 27

Back to Contents

DONALD DEFOSSET, JR.
Age: 71 Director since: October 2011 Former Chairman, President & CEO of Walter Industries, Inc. |  | CAREER:
| Donald DeFosset, Jr. retired in 2005 as Chairman, President & Chief Executive Officer of Walter Industries, Inc., a diversified public company with principal operating businesses in homebuilding and home financing, water transmission products and energy services. Mr. DeFosset had served since November 2000 as President & Chief Executive Officer, and since March 2002 as Chairman, of Walter Industries. Over his career, Mr. DeFosset held significant leadership positions in major multinational corporations, including Dura Automotive Systems, Inc., Navistar International Corporation and AlliedSignal, Inc. Mr. DeFosset is currently a director of the following public companies: National Retail Properties Inc. since 2008 (Non-Executive Chairman of the Board); Regions Financial Corporation since 2005 (Chairman of the Compensation Committee; Risk Committee); and Terex Corporation since 1999 (Chairman of the Nominating and Governance Committee; Audit Committee). Mr. DeFosset is also a director of various private companies and not-for-profit organizations.
| REASONS FOR ELECTION TO THE BOARD OF ITT:
| In considering Mr. DeFosset for director of the Company, the Board considered his extensive experience as a chief executive of a large diversified industrial company and as a senior executive of an international machinery manufacturer. His service on the boards of directors of a variety of large public companies further enhances his experience and adds value to the Company’s Board.
| BOARD COMMITTEES: | OTHER PUBLIC COMPANY BOARDS:
| ■ Audit Committee | ■ National Retail Properties, Inc.
| ■ Nominating and Governance Committee | ■ Regions Financial Corporation
|  |  | ■ Terex Corporation

NICHOLAS C. FANANDAKIS
Age: 63 Director since: October 2016 Former Executive Vice President of DowDuPont |  | CAREER:
| Nicholas C. Fanandakis is currently retired. He served as Executive Vice President of DowDuPont until June 2019. From November 2009 to September 2017, he served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of DuPont. He previously served as Group Vice President of DuPont Applied BioSciences in 2008 and the Vice President of Corporate Plans in 2007. Prior to 2007, Mr. Fanandakis served in several positions within the DuPont organization ranging from a variety of plant, marketing and product management positions within Petrochemicals, Chemicals & Pigments, and Specialty Chemicals, as well as in the Industrial Solutions market space. Mr. Fanandakis joined DuPont in 1979 as an accounting and business analyst in the Petrochemicals Department. Mr. Fanandakis is currently a director of the following public companies: FTI Consulting, Inc. since January 2014 (Chairman of the Audit Committee) and Duke Energy Corporation (Finance and Risk Management Committee and Audit Committee).
| REASONS FOR ELECTION TO THE BOARD OF ITT:
| In considering Mr. Fanandakis for director of the Company, the Board considered his significant financial and business experience resulting from holding various management positions at a large public manufacturing company, his overall financial management abilities, including multinational legal, tax and banking expertise, and his experience and knowledge of global industrial markets.
| BOARD COMMITTEES: | OTHER PUBLIC COMPANY BOARDS:
| ■ Audit Committee | ■ FTI Consulting, Inc.
|  | ■ Duke Energy Corporation

ITT INC.❘ 2020 PROXY STATEMENT 28

Back to Contents

RICHARD P. LAVIN
Age: 68 Director since: May 2013 Chairman Elect Former President & CEO of Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc. |  | CAREER:
| Richard P. Lavin was Chief Executive Officer & President of Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc., a leader in the development, manufacturing and fulfillment of fully integrated system solutions for the commercial vehicle market from May 2013 to November 2015. Prior to joining Commercial Vehicle Group, Mr. Lavin spent 29 years in a variety of positions with Caterpillar Inc. (“Caterpillar”), including as Vice President of manufacturing operations for the Asia Pacific Division, serving as Chairman of Shin Caterpillar Mitsubishi Ltd. - now Caterpillar Japan Ltd. - and Chairman of Caterpillar (China) Investment Co., Ltd, and as a group president for Construction Industries and Growth Markets. Mr. Lavin is currently a director of the public company Allison Transmission Holdings, Inc. since 2016 (Compensation Committee; Nominating & Governance Committee).
| REASONS FOR ELECTION TO THE BOARD OF ITT:
| In considering Mr. Lavin for director of the Company, the Board considered his experience overseeing Caterpillar’s largest operating division and extensive international experience through overseeing that company’s operations in China, India, Japan and the Asia-Pacific region. In addition, Mr. Lavin has a diverse legal and human resources background, having served as director of Corporate Labor and Human Relations and director of Compensation and Benefits, as well as the Vice President of Caterpillar’s Human Services Division.
| BOARD COMMITTEES: | OTHER PUBLIC COMPANY BOARDS:
| ■ Compensation and Personnel Committee (Chair) | ■ Allison Transmission Holdings, Inc.
| ■ Audit Committee |
|  | FORMER PUBLIC COMPANY BOARDS:
|  | ■ Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc. (2013-2015)
|  |  | ■ USG Corporation (2009-2019)

MARIO LONGHI
Age: 65 Director since: October 2017 Former President & CEO of United States Steel Corporation |  | CAREER:
| Mario Longhi served as the President & Chief Executive Officer of United States Steel Corporation, an integrated producer and manufacturer of flat-rolled sheet and tubular steel products for a wide range of industries from September 2013 to May 2017. Previously, Mr. Longhi was President of Gerdau Ameristeel Corporation from 2005 to 2006 and President and Chief Executive Officer from 2006 to 2011. He was also the Group President, Global Extrusions, at Alcoa Inc., where he served in a number of increasingly responsible roles over a more than 20-year career with the company. Throughout his career he has gained experience in the appliance, container, mining, automotive and transportation, aerospace, power generation, industrial machinery and construction industries. Mr. Longhi is currently a director of the public company Harsco Corporation (Management Development & Compensation Committee; Audit Committee).
| REASONS FOR ELECTION TO THE BOARD OF ITT:
| In considering Mr. Longhi for director of the Company, the Board considered his significant industrial leadership experience and global viewpoint, as well as his deep knowledge of the steel industry and commodities, which are important to understanding the Company’s overall business and results.
| BOARD COMMITTEES: | OTHER PUBLIC COMPANY BOARDS:
| ■ Compensation and Personnel Committee | ■ Harsco Corporation
|  | FORMER PUBLIC COMPANY BOARDS:
|  | ■ United States Steel Corporation (2013-2017)

ITT INC.❘ 2020 PROXY STATEMENT 29

Back to Contents

REBECCA A. MCDONALD
Age: 67 Director since: December 2013 Former CEO of Laurus Energy Inc. |  | CAREER:
| Rebecca A. McDonald retired in July 2012, having served since December 2008 as Chief Executive Officer of Laurus Energy Inc., a company involved in underground coal gasification development. She previously served as President, Gas and Power, BHP Billiton from March 2004 to September 2007, and, from October 2001 to January 2004, she served as President of the Houston Museum of Natural Science. Ms. McDonald has more than 25 years of experience in the energy industry. She has been responsible for the development, construction and operation of natural gas and liquids pipelines, gas and electricity distribution companies, as well as power plant and gas processing facilities in North America, Asia, Africa and South America.
| REASONS FOR ELECTION TO THE BOARD OF ITT:
| In considering Ms. McDonald for director of the Company, the Board considered her significant expertise in the oil and gas industry, as well as her executive-level experience and extensive knowledge of business systems and operations. The Board also considered her experience as a director of a variety of public and private companies within the energy industry.
| BOARD COMMITTEES: | OTHER PUBLIC COMPANY BOARDS:
| ■ Compensation and Personnel Committee | ■ Aggreko plc (2012-2015)
|  | ■ Granite Construction Incorporated (1994-2015)
|  | ■ CRH public limited company (2015-2016)
|  | ■ Veresen Inc. (2008-2017)

TIMOTHY H. POWERS
Age: 71 Director since: February 2015 Former Chairman, President & CEO of Hubbell Incorporated |  | CAREER:
| Timothy H. Powers was the Chairman, President & Chief Executive Officer of Hubbell Incorporated from 2004 to 2013. He was appointed to the position of Chairman after having served as the President and Chief Executive Officer of Hubbell from 2001 to 2004 and as the Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer from 1998 to 2001. Mr. Powers also served as Executive Vice President, Finance and Business Development Americas Region at ABB, Inc. and as Vice President and Corporate Controller for BBC Brown Boveri, Inc. Mr. Powers is currently a director of the public company WestRock Company (formerly MeadWestvaco Corporation) since 2006 (Audit Committee; Compensation Committee). In addition, Mr. Powers served as a director of the National Electric Manufacturers Association and as a trustee for Manufacturers Alliance for Productivity and Innovation until 2013.
| REASONS FOR ELECTION TO THE BOARD OF ITT:
| In considering Mr. Powers for director of the Company, the Board considered his significant experience as a Chief Executive Officer and finance officer in global manufacturing and engineering companies. The Board also considered his experience in the areas of management, strategic planning, and mergers and acquisitions in the manufacturing industry.
| BOARD COMMITTEES: | OTHER PUBLIC COMPANY BOARDS:
| ■ Audit Committee (Chair) | ■ WestRock Company
| ■ Nominating and Governance Committee |
|  | FORMER PUBLIC COMPANY BOARDS:
|  | ■ Hubbell Incorporated (2004-2014)

ITT INC.❘ 2020 PROXY STATEMENT 30

Back to Contents

LUCA SAVI
Age: 54 Director since: January 2019 CEO & President of ITT Inc. |  | CAREER:
| Luca Savi was appointed Chief Executive Officer, President and a director of the Company in January 2019. He previously served as President and Chief Operating Officer of the Company since August 2018 and as Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer since January 2017. Prior to that, he served as Executive Vice President and President, Motion Technologies since February 2016 and as Senior Vice President and President, Motion Technologies since November 2011. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Savi served as Chief Operating Officer, Comau Body Welding at Comau, a subsidiary of the Fiat Group responsible for producing and serving advanced manufacturing systems, from 2009 to 2011 and as Chief Executive Officer, Comau North America from 2007 to 2009. Mr. Savi previously held leadership roles at Honeywell International, and Royal Dutch Shell and technical roles at Ferruzzi-Montedison Group.
| REASONS FOR ELECTION TO THE BOARD OF ITT:
| In considering Mr. Savi. for director of the Company, the Board considered Mr. Savi’s significant experience in many of the companies’ most important end markets. The Board also considered his extensive operational, strategy and growth and innovation experience with industrial companies and, in particular, his knowledge of the Company’s business and operations having served as the President of the Company’s largest business unit and as its Chief Operating Officer since January 2017.

CHERYL L. SHAVERS
Age: 66 Director since: October 2018 Chairman & CEO of Global Smarts, Inc. |  | CAREER:
| Dr. Cheryl L. Shavers has served as the Chairman & Chief Executive Officer of Global Smarts, Inc., an advisory services and strategy firm that specializes in integration of capital, technology and information across national borders, since February 2001. From 1999 to 2001, Dr. Shavers served as the Undersecretary of Commerce for Technology at the U.S. Department of Commerce, where she oversaw the Office of Technology Policy and the Technology Administration, the focal point for partnerships between the U.S. government and the private sector pertaining to commercial and industrial innovation, productivity and economic growth. She also served as Undersecretary Designate from April 1999 to November 1999. Dr. Shavers has also served as a director of the Knowles Corporation since 2007.
| REASONS FOR ELECTION TO THE BOARD OF ITT:
| In considering Dr. Shavers for director of the Company, the Board considered her extensive experience as a highly regarded and sought after technical and business expert and her extensive experience with technology development, innovation and management of growth opportunities.
| BOARD COMMITTEES: | OTHER PUBLIC COMPANY BOARDS:
| ■ Nominating and Governance Committee | ■ Knowles Corporation
|  | FORMER PUBLIC COMPANY BOARDS:
|  | ■ Rockwell Collins Corporation (2001-2018)
|  |  | ■ Mentor Graphics Inc. (2016-2017)
|  |  | ■ Advanced Materials Technology Inc. (2008-2014)

ITT INC.❘ 2020 PROXY STATEMENT 31

Back to Contents

SABRINA SOUSSAN
Age: 50 Director since: October 2018 CEO of Siemens Mobility |  | CAREER:
| Sabrina Soussan has served as the Chief Executive Officer of Siemens Mobility since October 2017. Previously she served as the Chief Executive Officer of Siemens AG’s High-Speed, Commuter Trains, Locomotive, Metro and Light Rail business unit from October 2015 to September 2017. Ms. Soussan has held several other leadership positions in various other divisions of Siemens, including the Vice President of Sustainability and Energy Management of the Siemens Switzerland Ltd. Building Technologies Division, the head of strategy, marketing and global account management for the Building Automation unit and the head of the Powertrain business for Renault Nissan (Europe and Japan) for Siemens Automotive division. Ms. Soussan held various other positions at Siemens since she joined in 1997. Prior to Siemens, she was an Engine Research & Development Engineer for Renault. Ms. Soussan has also served as a Director of Schaeffler AG since 2019.
| REASONS FOR ELECTION TO THE BOARD OF ITT:
| In considering Ms. Soussan for director of the Company, the Board considered her extensive business and technical experience in the automotive, building technology, rail systems and aeronautics markets, as well as her leadership experience in a multinational organization.
| BOARD COMMITTEES: | OTHER PUBLIC COMPANY BOARDS:
| ■ Audit Committee | ■ Schaeffler AG

RECOMMENDATION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
| THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR THE ELECTION OF THE 11 NOMINEES LISTED ABOVE AS DIRECTORS. UNLESS A CONTRARY CHOICE IS SPECIFIED, PROXIES SOLICITED BY THE BOARD WILL BE VOTED FOR THE ELECTION OF THE 11 NOMINEES LISTED ABOVE AS DIRECTORS.

ITT INC.❘ 2020 PROXY STATEMENT 32

Back to Contents

RA TIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF THE INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
(PROXY ITEM NO. 2)

The Audit Committee is directly responsible for the appointment, compensation, retention and oversight of the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm. To execute this responsibility, the Audit Committee engages in a comprehensive annual evaluation of the independent registered public accounting firm’s qualifications, performance and independence and considers whether the independent registered public accounting firm should be rotated and the potential impact of selecting a different independent registered public accounting firm.

The Audit Committee has selected, and the Board of Directors has ratified the selection of, Deloitte & Touche LLP (“Deloitte”) to serve as our independent registered public accounting firm for 2020. Deloitte has served as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm since 2002. In accordance with SEC rules and Deloitte policies, audit partners are subject to rotation requirements that limit the number of consecutive years an individual partner may provide service to our Company. For lead and concurring audit partners, the maximum number of consecutive years of service in that capacity is five years. The process for selection of the Company’s lead audit partner pursuant to this rotation policy involves a meeting between the Chair of the Audit Committee and the candidate for the role, as well as discussion by the full committee and with management.

The Audit Committee and Board of Directors believe that the continued retention of Deloitte as our independent registered public accounting firm is in the best interest of the Company and our shareholders, and we are asking our shareholders to ratify the selection of Deloitte as our independent registered public accounting firm for 2020. Although ratification is not required by our By-laws or otherwise, the Board is submitting the selection of Deloitte to our shareholders for ratification because we value our shareholders’ views on the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm and as a matter of good corporate practice. In the event that our shareholders fail to ratify the selection, it will be considered a recommendation to the Board of Directors and the Audit Committee to consider the selection of a different firm. In addition, even if shareholders ratify the selection of Deloitte, the Audit Committee may in its discretion select a different independent registered public accounting firm at any time during the year if it determines that such a change would be in the best interests of the Company and our shareholders.

Deloitte is a registered public accounting firm regulated by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (the “PCAOB”). Representatives of Deloitte attended all regularly scheduled meetings of the Audit Committee during 2019. The Audit Committee discussed with the independent registered public accounting firm all communications required by auditing standards of the PCAOB. In addition, the committee discussed with the registered public accounting firm its independence from the Company and its management. The Audit Committee annually reviews and considers Deloitte’s performance of the Company’s audit, including the following performance factors:

■ | independence | ■ | leadership
■ | experience | ■ | non-audit services
■ | technical capabilities | ■ | management structure
■ | client service assessment | ■ | peer review program
■ | responsiveness | ■ | commitment to quality report
■ | financial strength | ■ | appropriateness of fees charged
■ | industry insight | ■ | compliance and ethics program

The Audit Committee also reviewed the terms and conditions of Deloitte’s engagement letter including an agreement between the Company and Deloitte to submit disputes between Deloitte and the Company to a dispute resolution process.

The Audit Committee discussed the engagement letter, as well as Deloitte’s fees and services with Deloitte and Company management. The Audit Committee also determined that any non-audit services (services other than those described in the annual audit services engagement letter) provided by Deloitte were permitted under the rules and regulations concerning auditor independence promulgated by the SEC and rules promulgated by the PCAOB. Representatives of Deloitte will be present at the Annual Meeting to answer questions. Representatives of Deloitte also will have the opportunity to make a statement if they desire to do so.

ITT INC.❘ 2020 PROXY STATEMENT 33

Back to Contents

INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM FEES

Aggregate fees billed to the Company for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 represent fees billed by Deloitte and its foreign affiliates.

Fiscal Year Ended (in thousands) |  | 2019 |  | 2018 |
Audit Fees(1) |  | $ | 4,304 |  | $ | 3,862 |
Audit-Related Fees(2) |  |  | 105 |  |  | 15 |
Tax Fees:(3) |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Tax Compliance Services |  |  | 408 |  |  | 168 |
Tax Planning Services |  |  | 831 |  |  | 150 |
Total Tax Services (sum of Tax Fees) |  |  | 1,238 |  |  | 318 |
All Other Fees |  |  | 35 |  |  | — |
TOTAL |  | $ | 5,682 |  | $ | 4,195 |

| (1) | Fees for audit services billed in 2019 and 2018 consisted of:

| • | audit of the Company’s annual financial statements and internal control over financial reporting;

| • | reviews of the Company’s quarterly financial statements;

| • | statutory and regulatory audits, consents and other services related to SEC matters; and

| • | financial accounting and reporting consultations.

| (2) | Fees for audit-related services billed in 2019 and 2018 consisted of miscellaneous attest services.

| (3) | Fees for tax services billed in 2019 and 2018 consisted of tax compliance and tax planning and advice:

| • | tax compliance services are services rendered, based upon facts already in existence or transactions that have already occurred, to document, compute and obtain government approval for amounts to be included in tax filings consisting primarily of:

| - | federal, foreign, state and local income tax return assistance;

| - | Internal Revenue Code and foreign tax code technical consultations; and

| - | transfer pricing analyses.

| • | tax planning services are services and advice rendered with respect to proposed transactions or services to analyze an anticipated tax result. Such services consisted primarily of tax advice related to intra-group restructuring.

PRE-APPROVAL OF AUDIT AND NON-AUDIT SERVICES

The Audit Committee pre-approves audit services provided by Deloitte. The Audit Committee has a policy on pre-approval of permitted non-audit services provided by Deloitte. The purpose of the policy is to identify thresholds for services, project amounts and circumstances where Deloitte may perform permitted non-audit services. A second level of review and approval by the Audit Committee is required when such permitted non-audit services, project amounts or circumstances exceed the specified amounts.

The Audit Committee has determined that, where practical, all permitted non-audit services shall first be placed for competitive bid prior to selection of a service provider. Management may select the party deemed best suited for the particular engagement, which may or may not be Deloitte. The policy is reviewed and reaffirmed on a regular basis to assure conformance with applicable rules.

The Audit Committee has approved specific categories of audit, audit-related and tax services incremental to the normal auditing services, which Deloitte may provide without further Audit Committee pre-approval. These categories include, among others, the following:

| 1. | Due diligence, closing balance sheet audit services, purchase price dispute support and other services related to mergers, acquisitions and divestitures;

| 2. | Employee benefit advisory services, independent audits and preparation of tax returns for the Company’s defined contribution, defined benefit and health and welfare benefit plans, preparation of the associated tax returns or other employee benefit advisory services;

| 3. | Tax compliance and certain tax planning and advice work; and

| 4. | Accounting consultations and support related to GAAP.

The Audit Committee has also approved specific categories of audit-related services, including the assessment and review of internal controls and the effectiveness of those controls, which outside internal audit service providers may provide without further approval.

ITT INC.❘ 2020 PROXY STATEMENT 34

Back to Contents

If fees for any pre-approved non-audit services provided by either Deloitte or any outside internal audit service provider exceed a pre-determined threshold during any calendar year, any additional proposed non-audit services provided by that service provider must be submitted for second-level approval by the Audit Committee. Other audit, audit-related and tax services that have not been pre-approved are subject to specific prior approval. The Audit Committee reviews the fees paid or committed to Deloitte during regularly scheduled meetings and at other times as necessary.

The Company has policies and procedures in place prohibiting, in some cases, employment of former Deloitte employees who were members of the audit engagement team.

RECOMMENDATION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
| THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR THE RATIFICATION OF DELOITTE TO SERVE AS THE COMPANY’S INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM FOR THE 2020 FISCAL YEAR. UNLESS A CONTRARY CHOICE IS SPECIFIED, PROXIES SOLICITED BY THE BOARD WILL BE VOTED FOR THE RATIFICATION OF DELOITTE.

AU DIT COMMITTEE REPORT

ROLE OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE

The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors provides oversight on matters relating to the Company’s financial reporting process and ensures that the Company develops and maintains adequate financial controls and procedures, and monitors compliance with these processes. This includes responsibility for, among other things:

| ■ | determination of qualifications and independence of Deloitte, the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm;

| ■ | appointment, compensation and oversight of Deloitte in preparing or issuing audit reports and related work;

| ■ | review of financial reports and other financial information provided by the Company, its systems of internal accounting and financial controls, and the annual independent audit of the Company’s financial statements;

| ■ | oversight and review of procedures developed for consideration of accounting, internal accounting controls and auditing-related complaints;

| ■ | review of the Company’s policies with respect to risk assessment, risk management and the Company’s major financial risk exposures;

| ■ | monitoring all elements of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting; and

| ■ | adoption of and monitoring the implementation and compliance with the Company’s Non-Audit Services Policy.

The Audit Committee also has oversight responsibility for confirming the scope and monitoring the progress and results of internal audits conducted by the Company’s internal auditor. The Audit Committee discussed with the Company’s internal auditors and Deloitte the plans for their respective audits. The Audit Committee met with the internal auditors and Deloitte, with and without management present, and discussed the results of their examinations, their evaluation of the Company’s internal controls, and the Company’s financial reporting.

The Company’s management has primary responsibility for the financial statements, including the Company’s system of disclosure and internal controls. The Audit Committee may investigate any matter brought to its attention. In that regard, the Audit Committee has full access to all books, records, facilities and personnel of the Company, and the Audit Committee may retain outside counsel, auditors or other independent experts to assist the Committee in performing its responsibilities. Any individual may also bring matters to the Audit Committee by following the procedures set forth in this Proxy Statement under the heading “Communication with the Board of Directors.”

AUDIT COMMITTEE CHARTER

The Board of Directors has adopted a written charter for the Audit Committee, which the Board of Directors and the Audit Committee review, and at least annually update and reaffirm. The charter sets out the purpose, membership and organization, and key responsibilities of the Audit Committee.

ITT INC.❘ 2020 PROXY STATEMENT 35

Back to Contents

REGULAR REVIEW OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

During 2019, the Audit Committee reviewed and discussed the Company’s audited financial statements with management. The Audit Committee, management and Deloitte reviewed and discussed the Company’s unaudited financial statements before the release of each quarter’s earnings report and filing on Form 10-Q, and the Company’s audited financial statements before the annual earnings release and filing on Form 10-K.

COMMUNICATIONS WITH DELOITTE

The Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed with management and Deloitte the matters required to be discussed under the standards of the PCAOB. These discussions included Deloitte’s responsibilities under generally accepted auditing standards in the United States, the scope of Deloitte’s audit, significant accounting policies and management judgments, the quality of the Company’s accounting principles and accounting estimates, new accounting guidance and any critical matters addressed during the audit. The Audit Committee met privately with Deloitte eight times during 2019.

INDEPENDENCE OF DELOITTE

Deloitte is directly accountable to the Audit Committee and the Board of Directors. The Audit Committee has received the written disclosures and the letter from Deloitte required by applicable requirements of the PCAOB regarding Deloitte’s communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence and has discussed with Deloitte their independence from management and the Company, any disclosed relationships and the impact of those relationships on Deloitte’s independence.

RECOMMENDATION REGARDING ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K

In performing its oversight function with regard to the 2019 financial statements, the Audit Committee relied on financial statements and information prepared by the Company’s management. It also relied on information provided by the internal audit staff as well as Deloitte. The Audit Committee reviewed and discussed with management the Company’s audited financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2019. Based on these discussions, and the information received and reviewed, the Audit Committee recommended to the Company’s Board of Directors that the Company’s financial statements be included in the Company’s 2019 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

This report is furnished by the members of the Audit Committee.

■ | Geraud Darnis | ■ | Donald DeFosset, Jr. | ■ | Nicholas C. Fanandakis
■ | Richard P. Lavin | ■ | Timothy H. Powers (Chair) | ■ | Sabrina Soussan

ITT INC.❘ 2020 PROXY STATEMENT 36

Back to Contents

AD VISORY VOTE TO APPROVE EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
(PROXY ITEM NO. 3)

In accordance with the requirements of Section 14A of the Exchange Act and the related rules of the SEC, we are including in these proxy materials a separate resolution subject to shareholder vote to approve, in a non-binding vote, the compensation of our Named Executive Officers as defined by the SEC in Item 402 of Regulation S-K as disclosed later in this Proxy Statement in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis. The following resolution will be submitted for a shareholder vote at the Annual Meeting:

“RESOLVED, that the shareholders of ITT Inc. (the “Company”) approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of the Company’s Named Executive Officers, as disclosed in the Company’s Proxy Statement for the 2020 Annual Meeting of Shareholders pursuant to Item 402 of the Securities and Exchange Commission Regulation S-K, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the compensation tables and narrative disclosures.”

In considering their vote, shareholders may wish to review with care the information on the Company’s compensation policies and decisions regarding the NEOs presented in this Proxy Statement in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis.

In particular, shareholders should note that the Company’s Compensation and Personnel Committee bases its executive compensation decisions on the following:

| ■ | alignment of executive and shareholder interests by providing incentives linked to the performance of certain financial metrics;

| ■ | the ability for executives to achieve long-term shareholder value creation without undue business risk;

| ■ | creating a clear link between an executive’s individual contribution and performance and his or her compensation;

| ■ | the extremely competitive nature of the industries in which we operate and our need to attract and retain the most creative and talented industry leaders; and

| ■ | comparability to the practices of peers in the industries that we operate in and other comparable companies generally.

The vote on this resolution is not intended to address any specific element of compensation; rather, the vote relates to the compensation of our NEOs, as described in this Proxy Statement in accordance with the SEC’s compensation disclosure rules.

The Board values the opinions of the Company’s shareholders as expressed through their votes and other communications. This vote is advisory in nature and non-binding; however, the Board will review and consider the shareholder vote when determining executive compensation. The current frequency of non-binding advisory votes on executive compensation is an annual vote, and we anticipate that the next vote will be at next year’s annual meeting.

RECOMMENDATION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
| THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR THE ADVISORY RESOLUTION APPROVING THE COMPENSATION OF THE COMPANY’S NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AS DESCRIBED IN THIS PROXY STATEMENT. UNLESS A CONTRARY CHOICE IS SPECIFIED, PROXIES SOLICITED BY THE BOARD WILL BE VOTED FOR THIS MANAGEMENT PROPOSAL.

ITT INC.❘ 2020 PROXY STATEMENT 37

Back to Contents

C OMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

TABLE OF CONTENTS |
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY | 38
GOVERNANCE AND COMPENSATION | 41
ELEMENTS OF COMPENSATION | 43
2019 ANNUAL INCENTIVE PLAN | 44
2019 LONG-TERM INCENTIVE COMPENSATION | 47
WHAT’S NEW FOR 2020? | 49
BENEFITS AND PERQUISITES | 49
OTHER COMPENSATION AND BENEFITS | 50
POLICIES | 51
COMPENSATION TABLES | 53

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

BUSINESS ENVIRONMENT AND FINANCIAL RESULTS

During 2019, we achieved record revenue and adjusted EPS by focusing on creating value for our customers, implementing productivity improvements, and making accretive organic and inorganic investments. We delivered strong results across multiple performance metrics in an increasingly challenging global environment. The following are highlights from our reported fiscal 2019 performance (all financial comparisons are 2019 to 2018):

Revenue |  | Segment Operating Margin |  | EPS |  | Operating Cash Flow
+4% |  | +20bps |  | -3% |  | -4%

Organic Revenue |  | Adjusted Segment Operating Margin |  | Adjusted EPS |  | Adjusted Free Cash Flow
+4% |  | +90bps |  | +18% |  | +3%

See the section titled “Key Performance Indicators and Non-GAAP Financial Measures” in our 2019 Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC for the reasons why we use non-GAAP financial measures and for reconciliations to the comparable GAAP financial measures.

OUR SAY ON PAY AND ENGAGEMENT WITH SHAREHOLDERS

Our annual advisory vote on executive compensation (“Say on Pay”) received 97% support last year, and has received an average of 92% support over the last five years.

Our investor outreach effort, as described under “Corporate Governance and Related Matters - Shareholder Engagement”, continued to evolve and develop last year. We increased the number of shareholders and percentage of shares covered by our outreach in late 2019, contacting shareholders representing nearly 70% of ITT’s outstanding shares and engaging with shareholders representing over 40% of such shares. While not all of these investors felt that a discussion on our governance, compensation and sustainability practices was necessary, we still had discussions with 16 institutions that represented over 40% of our total outstanding shares. During our discussions we heard the following general themes:

ITT INC.❘ 2020 PROXY STATEMENT 38

Back to Contents

| ■ | investors understood the relevance of our compensation program metrics to our business strategy and acknowledged our link between pay and performance;

| ■ | investors supported the changes we made in 2019, which included: (1) increasing the percentage of PSUs in the annual LTI award mix for executive officers from 50% to 60% and, (2) increasing stock ownership guidelines of the Senior vice Presidents from 2 times to 3 times salary, and increasing the CFO ownership guideline from 3 times to 4 times salary; and

| ■ | investors were supportive of the Board’s rationale for considering a program design change in 2020 to increase the weighting of the individual component of the AIP for executive officers from 10% to 20% of the total, and certain investors suggested potential enhancements to disclosure to accompany this change.

OUR COMMITMENT TO PAY FOR PERFORMANCE ALIGNMENT

We have designed our compensation programs to align the pay of our senior executives with both our short-term and long-term financial results and the performance of our stock. The majority of pay for our CEO and other NEOs is “at risk” and is impacted by our financial results and stock price performance.

THE IMPACT OF BUSINESS RESULTS ON OUR 2019 INCENTIvE PLANS

Our business strategy drives the design and metrics of our incentive plans. Our 2019 AIP includes metrics and weightings that encourage both growth (30% Adjusted EPS and 20% Adjusted Revenue) and operational excellence (20% Adjusted Free Cash Flow and 20% Adjusted Operating Margin), in addition to a 10% component that rewards executive officers for individual and team performance. 2019 was the final performance year of our 2017 PSU award, which had a payout determined by our relative return on invested capital (“ROIC”), which is intended to encourage efficient and disciplined use of capital, and relative total shareholder return (“TSR”), which is intended to directly align executive pay with shareholder return relative to our peer companies. More information on how relative ROIC and relative TSR are calculated can be found in “2019 Long-Term Incentive Compensation -- Performance Stock Units.”

As a result of our above target financial performance in 2019, the payouts of our incentive plans were also above target.

| ■ | Our CEO, Mr. Savi, received an AIP payout that was 146% of target, and the average payout to our other NEOs was 135%.

| ■ | All NEOs, except for Mr. Ghirardo who was hired in 2018, received a 160.4% payout on 2017 PSU awards.

ITT INC.❘ 2020 PROXY STATEMENT 39

Back to Contents

CEO PAY DECISIONS

On January 1, 2019, Luca Savi, previously President and Chief Operating Officer of the Company, was promoted to CEO and President and became a director of the Company. In setting compensation for our new CEO, the Compensation and Personnel Committee considered a number of factors, including peer group benchmarking, prior CEO compensation levels, and increases in connection with Mr. Savi’s promotion to President and Chief Operating Officer in August 2018. The Committee believes that CEO pay should be evaluated each year and that increases should occur based on individual and company performance.

Mr. Savi joined ITT in 2011 as the Senior Vice President and President, Motion Technologies based in Barge, Italy and was employed through ITT’s Italian subsidiary. For the past four years, Mr. Savi has been on an international assignment and based in Wuxi, China. In connection with Mr. Savi’s transition to CEO in 2019, Mr. Savi and his family relocated to the United States and now reside near ITT’s headquarters. We believe that the relocation of Mr. Savi to ITT’s headquarters will allow him to more effectively focus time and attention on his new role including direct engagement with other members of senior leadership at ITT headquarters. Mr. Savi’s employment relationship was changed from our Italian subsidiary to our U.S. entity and he is now subject to ITT’s U.S. policies that apply to all similarly situated employees. Mr. Savi’s compensation while employed by our Italian subsidiary through July 2019 was paid in euros and has been converted to U.S. dollars using a 1.12 average exchange rate.

ITT provided certain allowances and payments to Mr. Savi under existing policies in place for his international assignment in China and subsequent relocation to the U.S. These payments are for assignment-related costs (housing, school, and transportation, provided in a manner consistent with what is provided to other ITT employees on international assignment), costs to move from China to the U.S., tax assistance for assignment-related allowances, and the payment of accrued vacation, as required by Italian law, that was triggered when Mr. Savi’s employment relationship was transitioned from ITT’s Italian subsidiary to our U.S. entity. The payments related to Mr. Savi’s assignment in China and relocation to the U.S., as further explained in the Summary Compensation Table under All Other Compensation, are non-recurring, and the Board expects these costs be limited in future years.

In the first quarter of each year, the Compensation and Personnel Committee meets to determine CEO pay decisions for base salary, AIP and LTI award grants inclusive of both prior year performance and appropriate positioning versus the Representative Peer Group described on page 42. The follow table displays the decisions made during the first quarter 2020 with respect to CEO compensation.

Pay Component | 2019 Target Pay | 2020 Target Pay | Drivers for First Quarter 2020 Pay Decisions
Base Salary | $900,000 | $800,000 | In February 2020, the Committee considered the performance of ITT and the performance of Mr. Savi during 2019 and increased Mr. Savi’s 2020 base salary to $1,000,000 to be more competitive. On March 29, 2020, in response to the COVID-19 pandemic and the resulting economic uncertainty, the Committee elected to reduce the targeted base salary of our named executive officers by 20% effective as of April 1, 2020. The Committee has not elected to change AIP Targets at this time.
Annual Incentive Plan Target | $900,000 | $1,100,000 | Mr. Savi received a bonus payout of $1,314,000 for 2019 performance, which was 146% of target. As described below, 90% of the AIP payout for NEOs is tied directly to ITT’s financial results. The Committee chose to award Mr. Savi at 200% for the 10% individual component of the AIP for the following accomplishments: ■ Led ITT to record financial results and a strong return to shareholders ■ Continued to position ITT for long-term growth through $179M of organic investments and $118M of strategic acquisitions ■ Improved ITT’s leadership team while advancing succession planning and talent development strategies The Committee approved an increase to Mr. Savi’s AIP target from 100% to 110% of salary in 2020 to increase alignment of pay and performance and to better align with peer company benchmarking. The target represents 110% of base salary before the reduction due to the COVID-19 pandemic referenced above.
Long-Term Incentives (LTI)(1) | $3,200,000 | $3,800,000 | The Committee considered Mr. Savi’s performance and peer company benchmarking and increased the annual LTI value to $3,800,000 for the 2020 LTI award. LTI ties the actual amount that Mr. Savi will receive in pay directly to ITT’s financial performance and stock price, and encourages retention.
TOTAL TARGET COMPENSATION | $5,000,000 | $5,700,000 |

| (1) | The 2019 LTI value for Mr. Savi differs from what is displayed in the Summary Compensation Table (“SCT”) and Grants of Plan-Based Awards in 2019” table, each of which present the grant date fair value of the LTI awards as calculated under GAAP. Mr. Savi’s 2020 LTI award was granted in March 2020 and is not included in the SCT and the Grants of Plan-Based Awards table.

ITT INC.❘ 2020 PROXY STATEMENT 40

Back to Contents

GOVERNANCE AND COMPENSATION

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION PHILOSOPHY

We have designed our compensation programs to help us recruit and retain the executive talent required to successfully manage our business, achieve our business objectives, and maximize their long-term contributions to our success. We include compensation elements that are designed to align the interests of executives with our goals of enhancing shareholder value and achieving our long-term strategies. We determine total annual compensation by reviewing the median of the competitive market, then position compensation at, above or below the median based on experience, performance, critical skills and the general talent market for each senior executive.

BEST PRACTICES THAT SUPPORT OUR EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION PHILOSOPHY

The Compensation and Personnel Committee oversees the design and administration of our executive compensation programs and evaluates these programs against competitive practices, legal and regulatory developments and corporate governance trends.

The Compensation and Personnel Committee has incorporated the following best practices into our programs:

WHAT WE DO |  | WHAT WE DON’T DO
| Emphasize Long-Term Compensation to Ensure Alignment of Pay With Long-Term Performance |  |  | No Hedging or Pledging of Company Stock
| Significant Majority of Pay is Performance-Based and Not Guaranteed |  |  | No Accelerated Vesting of Equity Awards or Severance Benefits Solely Upon a Change in Control
| Stock Ownership Requirements Require Meaningful Holdings |  |  | No Tax Gross-Ups (unless related to international assignment or relocation)
| Double-Trigger Change in Control Vesting of Equity Awards |  |  | No Golden Parachutes
| Clawback Policy That Applies to Our Annual Incentive Plan and Equity Awards |  |  | No Repricing of Stock Options
| Proactive Engagement with Shareholders |  |  | No Supplemental Defined Benefit Pension for Executives
| Engages Independent Compensation Consultant |  |  | No Excessive Perquisites or Personal Benefits

KEY PARTICIPANTS IN THE COMPENSATION PROCESS

ROLE OF THE COMPENSATION AND PERSONNEL COMMITTEE

The Compensation and Personnel Committee reviews and approves the compensation elements and the compensation targets for each of our executive officers, including the NEOs. The Compensation and Personnel Committee also makes determinations with respect to the AIP as it relates to our executive officers, including the approval of annual performance goals and subsequent full-year achievement against those goals. It administers all elements of the Company’s long-term incentive plan, and approves the benefits and perquisites offered to executive officers. Further, the Compensation and Personnel Committee evaluates the Company’s compensation programs on an annual basis to ensure that our plans do not induce or encourage excessive risk-taking by participants. Pursuant to its charter, the Compensation and Personnel Committee may delegate authority to act upon specific matters to a subcommittee.

ROLE OF MANAGEMENT

During 2019, our CEO and Chief Human Resources Officer made recommendations to the Compensation and Personnel Committee regarding executive compensation actions and incentive awards. The Chief Human Resources Officer serves as the liaison between the Compensation and Personnel Committee and Pay Governance, providing internal data on an as-needed basis so that Pay Governance can produce comparative analyses for the Compensation and Personnel Committee. In 2019, the Company’s human resources, finance

ITT INC.❘ 2020 PROXY STATEMENT 41

Back to Contents

and legal departments supported the work of the Compensation and Personnel Committee by providing information, answering questions and responding to various requests of committee members.

ROLE OF THE INDEPENDENT COMPENSATION CONSULTANT

In 2019, the Compensation and Personnel Committee continued to use the services of Pay Governance in fulfilling its obligations under its charter, the material terms of which are described elsewhere in this Proxy Statement under the heading “Corporate Governance and Related Matters—Compensation and Personnel Committee.”

Pay Governance attended the four regularly scheduled meetings of the Compensation and Personnel Committee in 2019 and provided the Committee with objective expert analyses, assessments, research, and recommendations for executive compensation programs, incentives, perquisites and compensation standards. In this capacity, they provided services that related solely to work performed for, and at the direction of, the Compensation and Personnel Committee, including analysis of material prepared by management for the Committee’s review. Pay Governance also provides advice related to compensation for directors to the Nominating and Governance Committee.

The Compensation and Personnel Committee selected Pay Governance to serve as its independent compensation consultant only after assessing the firm’s independence. As part of its independence review, the Compensation and Personnel Committee reviewed the Company’s relationship with Pay Governance and determined that no conflicts of interest existed. The Compensation and Personnel Committee has the sole authority to retain and terminate consultants, including Pay Governance, with respect to compensation matters.

EXTERNAL BENCHMARKING

In 2019, as in past years, the Compensation and Personnel Committee considered competitive market compensation data, in addition to other factors, in determining policies and programs that address executive compensation, benefits and perquisites.

For 2019 pay decisions for the CEO and CFO, the Committee reviewed a peer group of 16 companies comparable to ITT in terms of revenue, market capitalization and industry in order to better evaluate executive compensation market practices (the “Representative Peer Group”). When making pay decisions the Committee also considers other factors such as individual experience and performance, the need for critical skills and the general talent market for each senior executive. The Compensation and Personnel Committee annually reviews and evaluates this Representative Peer Group to ensure that it remains appropriate.

2019 Representative Peer Group
■ Actuant Corporation (ATU) (now known as Enerpac Tool Group (EPAC)) | ■ EnPro Industries, Inc. (NPO) | ■ Nordson Corporation (NDSN)
■ AMETEK, Inc. (AME) | ■ Esterline Technologies Corp (ESL) | ■ SPX Flow Inc. (FLOW)
■ Barnes Group, Inc. (B) | ■ Flowserve Corporation (FLS) | ■ WABCO Holdings (WBC)
■ Carlisle Companies Inc. (CSL) | ■ Harsco Corporation (HSC) | ■ Woodward, Inc. (WWD)
■ Colfax Corporation (CFX) | ■ Hubbell Incorporated (HUBB) |
■ Crane Co. (CR) | ■ IDEX Corporation (IEX) |

During 2019, two companies in the Representative Peer Group, Esterline and WABCO, were in the process of being acquired. As a result, in August 2019, the Compensation and Personnel Committee approved the addition of Curtiss-Wright and Sensata to replace Esterline and WABCO in the Representative Peer Group for compensation decisions that are made in 2020.

The Compensation and Personnel Committee’s review of external market data also included analysis of compensation benchmark data from Willis Towers Watson and other compensation survey information provided by Pay Governance. This data provides a broader view of executive compensation benchmarking for jobs that are not reported in the Proxy Statement.

In particular, the Committee’s analysis used a benchmark group from a Willis Towers Watson survey consisting of 64 companies from the Industrials, Materials and Energy sectors with annual revenue between approximately $1.25 billion and $5 billion (see Appendix A).

ITT INC.❘ 2020 PROXY STATEMENT 42

Back to Contents

ELEMENTS OF COMPENSATION

NEO COMPENSATION ELEMENTS AT A GLANCE

The disclosure of our NEO compensation for 2019 covers the following executive officers:

■ Luca Savi, Chief Executive Officer and President

■ Thomas M. Scalera, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

■ Mary Beth Gustafsson, Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary

■ Farrokh Batliwala, Senior Vice President and President, Connect & Control Technologies

■ Carlo Ghirardo, Senior Vice President and President, Motion Technologies

The compensation of our executive officers, including our NEOs, is reviewed in detail by the Compensation and Personnel Committee during the first quarter of every year. NEO direct compensation for 2019 consisted of a base salary, an AIP award and LTI award, each of which is detailed below.

2019 Compensation Element | Form | Metrics & Weightings | Rationale for Providing
Base Salary | Cash | Not Applicable | Base salary is a competitive fixed pay element tied to role, experience, performance, and criticality of skills.
Annual Incentive Plan Award | Cash | ■ Adjusted EPS (30%) ■ Adjusted Operating Margin (20%) ■ Adjusted Free Cash Flow (20%) ■ Adjusted Revenue (20%) ■ Individual and Team Goals (10%) | The AIP is designed to reward achievement of the Company, business unit (where applicable) and individual performance objectives. The AIP is structured to emphasize overall performance and collaboration among the business units. It uses metrics that are fundamental short-term drivers of shareholder value. Each NEO also has 10% of his or her AIP tied to the achievement of individual and team goals. AIP may pay out from 0% to 200% of target.
Long-Term Incentive Awards | Stock | PSU Awards: ■ Relative TSR (50%) ■ ROIC (50%) | The LTI plan is designed to reward performance that drives long-term shareholder value through the use of three-year cliff vesting: ■ PSUs (60% of LTI mix) provide rewards linked to absolute stock price performance (due to denomination as ITT share units) and can go up or down based on two key measures, equally weighted, and aligned with long-term growth. PSUs may pay out from 0% to 200% of target. ■ RSUs (40% of LTI mix) link compensation to absolute stock price performance and strengthen retention value. The grant date of PSUs and RSUs is determined on the date on which the Compensation and Personnel Committee approves these awards, which is typically in February or March.

The Company also provides benefits and limited perquisites to its NEOs that it believes are competitive with the external market for talent. For a more detailed discussion of these benefits and perquisites, see the discussion under the heading “Benefits and Perquisites.”

2019 BASE SALARY INCREASES

The Compensation and Personnel Committee reviewed the compensation level of each NEO based on the Representative Peer Group and the external survey data. Based on the Committee’s targeted pay positioning, the evaluation of each NEO’s performance, and the external market data on competitive pay levels provided by Pay Governance, the Committee awarded base salary merit increases effective in March 2019 to Mr. Scalera, Ms. Gustafsson Mr. Batliwala and Mr. Ghirardo. Mr. Savi’s base salary was effective upon his promotion to CEO and President on January 1, 2019.

ITT INC.❘ 2020 PROXY STATEMENT 43

Back to Contents

2018 Annual Base Salary | 2019 Annual Base Salary | Percent Increase
Luca Savi(1) | $ | 750,000 | $ | 900,000 | 20%
Thomas M. Scalera |  | 530,000 |  | 540,000 | 2%
Mary Beth Gustafsson |  | 472,500 |  | 482,000 | 2%
Farrokh Batliwala |  | 380,000 |  | 400,000 | 5%
Carlo Ghirardo(2) |  | 403,200 |  | 414,400 | 3%

| (1) | Mr. Savi’s salary increase of 20% was for his promotion from President and COO of ITT to CEO and President of ITT, which occurred on January 1, 2019.

| (2) | Mr. Ghirardo is employed by ITT Italy Holding S.r.l and is paid in euros. Mr. Ghirardo’s base salary has been converted from euros to U.S. Dollars using an average exchange rate of 1.12.

2019 ANNUAL INCENTIVE PLAN

For 2019, AIP payouts averaged 137% of target for all of the NEOs, reflecting record financial results, including above target achievement, on average, of annual financial goals. The Company’s AIP provides for an annual cash payment to participating executives established as a target percentage of base salary. In setting AIP awards, the Compensation and Personnel Committee approves target AIP awards after careful consideration of external data, individual roles and responsibilities, and individual performance.

The Company pays for AIP performance that demonstrates substantial achievement of plan goals. We established strong incentives and set aggressive goals for all financial metrics. The Company must achieve a certain threshold for each of the four financial performance metrics discussed below in order for each performance component to be considered in the calculation of the AIP payout. Performance below the threshold performance level results in a zero payout for that particular performance component.

The formula to determine each NEO’s AIP total potential payment is as follows:

| 2019 AIP Potential Payout = |
| (Base Salary) x (Target Award Percentage) x (AIP Performance Factor) |

AIP award payouts are capped at 200% of an individual’s annual cash bonus target.

2019 AIP AWARDS PAID IN 2020

The 2019 AIP awards paid in March 2020 are as follows:

Named Executive Officer | 2019 Target AIP Awards as Percentage of Base Salary | 2019 AIP Target Amounts | 2019 AIP Awards (Paid in 2020) | 2019 AIP Awards as Percentage of Target (Paid in 2020)
Luca Savi | 100% | $ | 900,000 | $ | 1,314,000 | 146%
Thomas M. Scalera | 75% |  | 405,000 |  | 550,800 | 136%
Mary Beth Gustafsson | 75% |  | 361,500 |  | 502,490 | 139%
Farrokh Batliwala | 75% |  | 300,000 |  | 357,000 | 119%
Carlo Ghirardo(1) | 65% |  | 269,360 |  | 387,880 | 144%

| (1) | Mr. Ghirardo’s 2019 AIP Target and 2019 AIP Award (Paid in 2020) have been converted from euros to U.S. Dollars using the 2019 average exchange rate of 1.12.

ITT INC.❘ 2020 PROXY STATEMENT 44

Back to Contents

2019 AIP PERFORMANCE METRICS AND WEIGHTINGS

Based on the Company’s 2019 business objectives, the Compensation and Personnel Committee identified four financial performance metrics and an individual component, for the 2019 performance year, which together comprise the AIP Performance Factor.

Metric | Weighting | Reason for Selection | Details
Adjusted Earnings Per Share or Adjusted EPS | 30% | Important measure of the value provided to shareholders | Adjusted EPS is defined as income from continuing operations attributable to ITT Inc. per diluted share, adjusted to exclude special items on an after-tax basis. The after-tax basis of each special item is determined using the jurisdictional tax rate of where the expense or benefit occurred.
Adjusted Free Cash Flow and Adjusted Segment Free Cash Flow | 20% | Important measure of how the Company converts its net earnings into deployable cash | Adjusted Free Cash Flow is defined as net cash provided by operating activities less capital expenditures, adjusted for cash payments for restructuring costs, realignment actions, other significant items that impact current results which management views as unrelated to the Company’s ongoing operations and performance. Adjusted Free Cash Flow in this Proxy Statement, unlike in our Annual Reports on 10-Ks and Quarterly Reports on 10-Qs, does include net asbestos cash flows. Adjusted Segment Free Cash Flow is defined as segment level net cash provided by operating activities less capital expenditures, adjusted for special items and the impact of foreign currency fluctuations.
Adjusted Operating Margin and Adjusted Segment Operating Margin | 20% | Emphasizes the importance of maintaining healthy margins | Adjusted Operating Margin is defined as the ratio of Adjusted Operating Income or Adjusted Segment Operating Income, over Organic Revenue, adjusted to exclude special items that include, but are not limited to, asbestos-related impacts, restructuring costs, realignment costs, certain asset impairment charges, certain acquisition-related impacts, and unusual or infrequent items. Special items represent significant charges or credits that impact the current results, which management views as unrelated to the Company’s ongoing operations and performance.
Organic Revenue and Organic Segment Revenue | 20% | Reflects the Company’s emphasis on growth | Organic Revenue is defined as revenue, excluding the estimated impact of foreign currency fluctuations, acquisitions, and divestitures. Adjusted Segment Revenue is defined as segment level revenue excluding the estimated impact of foreign currency fluctuations, acquisitions, and divestitures. In both cases, divestitures include sales of portions of our business that did not meet the criteria for presentation as a discontinued operation.
Individual Component | 10% | Provides focus on supporting enterprise initiatives that will create growth and increase shareholder value | Each NEO establishes several personal or team goals related to Company initiatives or segment-specific initiatives that are aligned with the strategy of the business and the goals of the CEO. For 2019, the areas established at the start of the performance period were: ■ Financial: Deliver on our financial commitments. ■ Culture and Talent: Focus on our people and their work environment by continuing our culture journey through engaging and energizing employees around our strategy, purpose and principles, and increasing the skills of our leaders. ■ Execution: Differentiate ourselves through safety, effectiveness and efficiency; ensure each part of the organization or segment is optimized and delivering on our commitments to our customers. ■ Growth and Innovation: Advance technology and customer relationships to create new opportunities and growth. ■ Capital Deployment: Drive actions to optimize the portfolio through mergers and acquisitions and organic investments.

As permitted by the ITT Annual Incentive Plan for Executive Officers, the Compensation and Personnel Committee may exclude the impact of acquisitions, divestitures and other special items in computing AIP awards. Special items represent significant charges or credits that impact current results, which management views as unrelated to the Company’s ongoing operations and performance. Special items may include, but are not limited to, asbestos-related costs, restructuring costs, realignment costs, pension settlement and other curtailment costs, certain acquisition-related expenses, income tax settlements or adjustments, and unusual and infrequent items. The four financial performance metrics applicable to each NEO are therefore non-GAAP financial measures and should not be considered a substitute for measures determined in accordance with GAAP. These non-GAAP financial measures may not be comparable to similar measures reported by other companies or those that we use in our Form 10-K or other external financial presentations.

ITT INC.❘ 2020 PROXY STATEMENT 45

Back to Contents

2019 AIP PERFORMANCE TARGETS AND RESULTS

The Adjusted EPS, Adjusted Free Cash Flow, Adjusted Operating Margin and Organic Revenue targets were based on the Company’s 2019 operating budget. These targets were set early in 2019. The Compensation and Personnel Committee reviewed the operating budget with management to ensure that the targets were appropriate and determined that the achievement of the combination of financial goals would be challenging and reflect strong performance considering the uncertainty in some of our key end markets. In addition to these metrics, ITT Corporate and each of the Segments have working capital financial targets that if not achieved will result in up to a 5 point reduction of the final AIP financial score. In 2019, Industrial Process and Connect & Control Technologies each received a penalty of 2.5 percentage points for missing targets for working capital as a percentage of sales. The table below sets forth the target and actual results for each 2019 AIP financial performance metric at the corporate level.

CORPORATE FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE TARGETS

The financial targets for Mr. Savi, Mr. Scalera and Ms. Gustafsson reflect ITT Corporate targets.

Metric | Threshold (50%) |  | Target (100%) | Maximum (200%) | 2019 Results | 2019 Payout
Adjusted Earnings Per Share | $ | 3.01 | $ | 3.54 | $ | 4.25 | $ | 3.81 | 138%
Adjusted Free Cash Flow | $ | 226.7M | $ | 266.7M | $ | 320.0M | $ | 313.8M | 188%
Adjusted Operating Margin |  | 13.0% |  | 14.4% |  | 16.6% |  | 15.1% | 132%
Organic Revenue | $ | 2,541M | $ | 2,823M | $ | 3,106M | $ | 2,835M | 104%

SEGMENT FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE TARGETS

The financial targets for Mr. Batliwala and Mr. Ghirardo reflect their business segments, in addition to the ITT Corporate Adjusted Earnings Per Share target. The business segments receive an additional benefit to their financial score and bonus payout pool when ITT exceeds financial targets.

Financial Targets of the Connect & Control business segment, which apply to Mr. Batliwala:

Metric | Threshold (50%) |  | Target (100%) | Maximum (200%) | 2019 Results | 2019 Payout
Adjusted Segment Free Cash Flow | $ | 101.9M | $ | 119.9M | $ | 143.9M | $ | 104.5M | 57%
Adjusted Segment Operating Margin |  | 15.8% |  | 17.5% |  | 20.2% |  | 17.5% | 99%
Organic Segment Revenue | $ | 621M | $ | 690M | $ | 758M | $ | 657M | 77%

Financial Targets of the Motion Technologies business segment, which apply to Mr. Ghirardo:

Metric | Threshold (50%) |  | Target (100%) | Maximum (200%) | 2019 Results | 2019 Payout
Adjusted Segment Free Cash Flow | $ | 173.9M | $ | 204.6M | $ | 245.5M | $ | 218.3M | 134%
Adjusted Segment Operating Margin |  | 16.1% |  | 17.9% |  | 20.6% |  | 18.1% | 104%
Organic Segment Revenue | $ | 1,186M | $ | 1,318M | $ | 1,450M | $ | 1,273M | 83%

AIP INDIVIDUAL COMPONENT CONSIDERATIONS

Each NEO has 10% of their AIP bonus target based on the individual component, which rewards achievement of their individual and team goals. The Compensation and Personnel Committee considered the following achievements when determining the individual component payout of each NEO. The considerations for the CEO were described previously in the “Executive Summary.”

■ Thomas M. Scalera, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer:

| ● | Provided leadership and execution during the CEO transition

| ● | Delivered record financial results and led investor relations efforts

| ● | Drove tax strategy to maximize benefits to ITT

ITT INC.❘ 2020 PROXY STATEMENT 46

Back to Contents

■ Mary Beth Gustafsson, Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary:

| ● | Drove strategy and execution of strategic legal matters that provide a financial benefit to ITT

| ● | Deeply involved in strategic M&A decision-making

| ● | Focused on legal cost containment

■ Farrokh Batliwala, Senior Vice President and President, Connect & Control Technologies:

| ● | Led performance improvement in critical CCT businesses and locations

| ● | Cultivated and completed a strategic aerospace acquisition

| ● | Successfully completed multi-year contract negotiations at key customers

■ Carlo Ghirardo, Senior Vice President and President, Motion Technologies:

| ● | Led results that significantly outperformed the global auto market

| ● | Successfully launched Mexico facility to grow revenue from customers in North America

| ● | Drove market share gains in our strategic rail business

2019 LONG-TERM INCENTIVE COMPENSATION

In 2019, the Compensation and Personnel Committee approved two types of grants for the Company’s annual LTI awards with each addressing long-term shareholder value alignment in different ways. The Committee believes that granting a combination of PSUs and RSUs provides alignment with shareholder interests, retention value and a direct connection between pay and the performance of our Company over the long term. LTI for our NEOs was allocated as follows:

The following table shows the target value of the LTI award grants made to NEOs in March 2019 as part of the Company’s regular annual compensation process. These LTI values were determined, taking into account base pay and annual incentive values, in developing market competitive total compensation levels and an appropriate mix of fixed versus variable and short-term versus long-term incentives. These values also considered each NEO’s role, potential long-term contribution, performance, experience and skills.

60% PSUs | + | 40% RSUs

Named Executive Officer | PSUs (Target Award) |  | RSUs |  | Total(1)
Luca Savi | $ | 1,920,000 | $ | 1,280,000 | $ | 3,200,000
Thomas M. Scalera |  | 600,000 |  | 400,000 |  | 1,000,000
Mary Beth Gustafsson |  | 450,000 |  | 300,000 |  | 750,000
Farrokh Batliwala |  | 300,000 |  | 200,000 |  | 500,000
Carlo Ghirardo |  | 240,000 |  | 160,000 |  | 400,000

| (1) | The values in this table reflect target amounts approved by the Compensation and Personnel Committee; the values reported in the SCT and the Grants of Plan-Based Awards tables present the grant date fair value as calculated under GAAP.

PERFORMANCE STOCK UNITS

PSUs are settled in shares after a three-year performance vesting period, with performance tied equally to the Company’s three-year TSR performance relative to a group of peer companies and the Company’s ROIC.

Delivery of shares generally requires employment throughout the three-year performance period. PSUs provide alignment with absolute stock performance, relative stock performance, Company performance and potential retention value. For each applicable employee, there may be up to three outstanding PSU award periods at any time. No dividend equivalents are paid on unvested PSUs.

ROIC (50% WEIGHTING)

■ The Compensation and Personnel Committee approved ROIC as a metric to align executive pay with the Company’s result in driving efficient and disciplined deployment of capital.

■ ROIC for the 2019 PSUs is a percentage that will be calculated by dividing (A) after-tax income from continuing operations attributable to the Company, adjusted to exclude the after-tax impact from special items, interest income or expense and amortization of expense from intangible assets by (B) average total assets from continuing operations, less asbestos-related assets (including deferred tax assets on asbestos-related matters) and non-interest bearing current liabilities for the five preceding quarterly periods. Special items represent significant charges or credits that impact

ITT INC.❘ 2020 PROXY STATEMENT 47

Back to Contents

results, such as unbudgeted acquisitions or divestitures, but may not be related to the Company’s ongoing operations and performance, as disclosed in the Company’s filings with the SEC.

RELATIVE TSR (50% WEIGHTING)

■ Relative TSR was again selected as a metric by the Committee to ensure executive compensation is aligned with shareholder value creation.

■ The relative TSR peer group includes companies in the S&P 400 Capital Goods index and additional companies from the transportation and industrial pump/flow industries in order to provide a broad set of companies that align with ITT’s portfolio mix.

■ TSR performance is measured by comparing the average closing stock price for the month of December prior to the start of the three-year performance cycle, to the average closing stock price for the month of December that concludes the three-year performance.

■ Vesting at the end of the applicable three-year performance period is based on the Company’s TSR performance ranked against the TSR performance of the other companies within the TSR peer group.

If Company’s Relative Total Shareholder Return Performance is: | Payout Factor for TSR Component of PSUs*
at the 80th percentile or greater | 200%
at the 50th percentile | 100%
at the 35th percentile | 50%
less than the 35th percentile | 0%
*Payouts for performance between the percentiles shown are interpolated. |

PAYOUT ON PSUs GRANTED IN 2017

In 2017, ITT granted PSUs to certain executives, including each of the NEOs, except for Mr. Ghirardo who joined ITT in 2018. The three-year performance targets were based equally on the Company’s TSR performance relative to the performance of companies in the S&P 400 Capital Goods Index and the Company’s ROIC performance relative to the results of the companies in the 2017 Representative Peer Group. The payout of the 2017 PSUs was 160.4% and based on the following:

■ 2017-2019 ROIC Results (50% weighting): ITT’s relative ROIC performance was at the 56.3 percentile of the 2017 Representative Peer Group companies. The payout for the ROIC metric was 120.8% of target.

■ 2017-2019 TSR Results (50% weighting): During the three-year performance period, ITT’s TSR was at the 89.7 percentile of the index of companies. The payout for the TSR metric was 200% of target.

RESTRICTED STOCK UNITS

RSUs are settled in shares after a three-year vesting period and provide alignment with stock performance and retention value. Grants of RSUs provide NEOs with stock ownership of unrestricted shares after the restrictions lapse. NEOs receive RSU awards because, in the judgment of the Compensation and Personnel Committee and based on management recommendations, these individuals are in positions most likely to influence the achievement of the Company’s long-term value creation goals and to create shareholder value over time. The Compensation and Personnel Committee reviews all grants of RSUs for executive officers prior to the award, including awards based on performance, retention-based awards, and awards contemplated for new employees as part of employment offers. The CEO has the authority to grant RSUs to other employees in certain situations. These grants are reviewed by the Compensation and Personnel Committee at its next scheduled meeting. RSUs do not grant dividend or voting rights to the holder over the vesting period, however, dividend equivalents are accrued and paid after vesting. In certain cases, such as for new hires or to facilitate retention, selected employees may receive RSUs subject to different vesting terms.

TRANSITION-RELATED GRANTS

In addition to annual LTI awards, the Compensation and Personnel Committee may award other grants in the form of PSUs, RSUs or stock options. These grants are used to attract new senior executives to ITT, provide additional retention incentive or reward extraordinary performance. The Compensation and Personnel Committee did not approve any transition awards for executive officers in 2019.

ITT INC.❘ 2020 PROXY STATEMENT 48

Back to Contents

WHAT’S NEW FOR 2020?

During our annual investor engagements sessions in November, we specifically asked for feedback on a potential design change we were considering for 2020. The change involves increasing the weighting of the individual component in AIP for executive officers from 10% to 20%. The rationale for this change is to increase the focus on, and align pay to, long-term strategic initiatives that may not immediately result in short-term financial results. Increasing the individual component of AIP will allow the Compensation and Personnel Committee and the CEO (with respect to his direct reports) to better align pay with performance on individual and team strategic long-term initiatives, such as culture, safety, talent, and sustainability.

Investors generally supported this potential change with some suggesting an even higher weighting on individual goals when applied appropriately to drive long-term results. Investors also suggested clear disclosure on the rationale for the change and to provide a rigorous explanation of the performance and results that drive the individual scores for each executive. The Committee discussed the importance of driving long-term strategic initiatives and the feedback from investors before approving the increase of the AIP individual component weighting from 10% to 20% for the 2020 performance year.

BENEFITS AND PERQUISITES

All of the NEOs, except for Mr. Ghirardo who is employed by ITT Italy Holding s.r.l., are eligible to participate in the Company’s broad-based U.S. employee benefits program. The program includes the ITT Retirement Savings Plan, which provides before-tax and after-tax savings features, group medical and dental coverage, group life insurance, group accidental death and dismemberment insurance and other benefit plans. Prior to the spin-off of our defense and water businesses on October 31, 2011 which established us as a new diversified global, multi-industrial company (the “Spin Transaction”), employees also participated in a pension program.

All of the NEOs, except for Mr. Ghirardo, together with most of the Company’s other salaried employees who work in the United States, participate in the ITT Retirement Savings Plan, a tax-qualified savings plan, which allows employees to contribute to the plan on a before-tax basis, on an after-tax basis, or as a Roth contribution. The Company makes a core contribution of 3% or 4% of pay to the plan for all eligible employees and matches 50% of employee contributions, up to 6% of pay. The core contribution is 3% for employees whose age plus years of service is less than 50, and 4% for employees whose age plus years of service is at least 50. In addition, employees who were participating in the ITT Salaried Retirement Plan at the time it was frozen, as described below, and whose age plus years of service was at least 60 at that time, may have been eligible for up to five years of transition employer contributions following the Spin Transaction. The transition employer contributions ended on October 31, 2016.

The Company provides only those perquisites that it considers to be reasonable and consistent with competitive practices. Perquisites available for our NEOs are financial and estate planning reimbursement of up to $15,000 per year. Mr. Ghirardo receives a company car, which is a common market practice for executives in Italy.

Amounts reported as perquisites also include reimbursement of certain relocation-related expenses, which are described in detail in the notes to the “All Other Compensation Table” in the section entitled “Compensation Tables”.

RETIREMENT AND BENEFITS PLAN FOR MR. SAVI AND MR. GHIRARDO

Mr. Savi began his career with ITT in Barge, Italy and was eligible for statutory retirement and health and welfare benefits that are generally provided to our employees in Italy that have the classification of Dirigenti (Executive). During Mr. Savi’s assignment in China, he and his family were covered by ITT’s international healthcare coverage plan, which covers all employees that participate in an international assignment. He also participated in a Motion Technologies (Italy) supplemental retirement plan provided under the terms of the collective bargaining agreement applicable to executives of industrial companies. Mr. Ghirardo joined ITT as Senior Vice President and President, Motion Technologies and is employed by ITT’s Italian subsidiary.

These benefits are provided in addition to the Italian government-provided retirement benefits. Under the terms of the plan, both Mr. Savi and Mr. Ghirardo could contribute up to €6,000 annually and receive a company matching contribution of up to €6,000.

Mr. Savi was no longer eligible for benefits from Italy after he relocated with his family to the U.S. in July 2019. Mr. Ghirardo continues to be eligible for these benefits as an employee of ITT in Italy.

ITT INC.❘ 2020 PROXY STATEMENT 49

Back to Contents

OTHER COMPENSATION AND BENEFITS

POST-EMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION

ITT DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN

For periods prior to 2020, our NEOs, except Mr. Savi and Mr. Ghirardo, were eligible to participate in the ITT Deferred Compensation Plan. This plan provided United States executives an opportunity to defer receipt of between 2% and 90% of any AIP awards they earned. The amount of deferred compensation ultimately would also reflect the performance of benchmark investment funds made available under the ITT Deferred Compensation Plan as selected by the executive. Participants in the ITT Deferred Compensation Plan may elect a fund that tracks the performance of the Company’s common stock. Beginning in 2020, executives will no longer be able to defer compensation under the ITT Deferred Compensation Plan, but will still be entitled to receive any compensation deferred prior to this date in accordance with the plan.

ITT SALARIED RETIREMENT PLAN

Until October 31, 2011, most of our salaried employees who worked in the United States participated in the ITT Salaried Retirement Plan. Under the plan, participants could elect, on an annual basis, to be covered by either a Traditional Pension Plan (described elsewhere in this Proxy Statement under the heading “Compensation Tables—2019 Pension Benefits”) or a Pension Equity Plan formula for future pension accruals. The ITT Salaried Retirement Plan was a tax-qualified plan, which provided a base of financial security for employees after they cease working. The ITT Salaried Retirement Plan was transferred by the Company to Exelis Inc., our defense business that was spun off in the Spin Transaction, effective on October 31, 2011. Both service credit and accrued benefits were frozen as of that date, and certain participants were eligible to receive transition employer contributions into the ITT Retirement Savings Plan. Exelis, Inc. was later acquired by Harris Corporation and Harris Corporation and L3 Technologies merged in 2019. to become L3Harris Technologies Inc. Mr. Scalera is the only NEO with benefits under this plan.

SEVERANCE PLAN ARRANGEMENTS

The Company maintains severance arrangements for most of its senior executives, including all of the NEOs. These arrangements are included in two plans, one covering most severance circumstances (the ITT Senior Executive Severance Pay Plan), and the other covering severance following a change-in-control event (the ITT Senior Executive Change in Control Severance Pay Plan). These plans do not allow for the payment of tax gross-ups on severance pay or other benefits. These plans are regularly reviewed by the Compensation and Personnel Committee.

The purpose of the ITT Senior Executive Severance Pay Plan is to provide a period of transition for senior executives upon termination of employment. The terms of the ITT Senior Executive Severance Pay Plan apply to Mr. Savi, Mr. Scalera, Ms. Gustafsson, and Mr. Batliwala, however the length of Mr. Scalera’s severance benefit is specified in a 2011 employment letter entered into at the time of the Spin Transaction. The severance terms for Mr. Ghirardo are covered under the National Collective Agreement for the Industrial Sector Managers in Italy. This agreement provides Mr. Ghirardo with termination benefits in the event his employment is terminated for other than cause. Senior executives, who are full-time salaried employees of the Company or any subsidiary, who are paid under a U.S. payroll and who report directly to the CEO, are covered by the ITT Senior Executive Severance Pay Plan. The plan generally provides for severance payments if the Company terminates a senior executive’s employment without cause. In the event that any payment would constitute an excess parachute payment within the meaning of Section 280G of the Code, then the aggregate of all payments would be reduced so that the present value of the aggregate of all payments is maximized, but is not subject to excise tax under Section 4999 of the Code or the deduction limitation of Section 280G of the Code.

The purpose of the ITT Senior Executive Change in Control Severance Pay Plan is to provide compensation in the case of termination of employment in connection with an acceleration event (defined under the heading “Compensation Tables— Potential Post-Employment Compensation—Change in Control Arrangements”) including a change in control. The ITT Senior Executive Change in Control Pay Plan applies to all NEOs. The provisions of this plan are specifically designed to address the inability of senior executives to influence the Company’s future performance after certain change of control events. The plan is structured to encourage executives to act in the best interests of shareholders by providing for certain compensation and retention benefits and payments in the case of an acceleration event.

These plans, including the potential post-employment payments that our NEOs would receive pursuant to these plans, are described in more detail elsewhere in this Compensation Discussion and Analysis under the heading “Compensation Tables—Potential Post-Employment Compensation.” The severance plans apply to our key employees as defined by Section 409A.

ITT INC.❘ 2020 PROXY STATEMENT 50

Back to Contents

POLICIES

THE ROLE OF RISK AND RISK MITIGATION

In 2019, the Compensation and Personnel Committee evaluated risk factors associated with our businesses in determining compensation structure and pay practices. The structure of the Board of Directors’ committees facilitates this evaluation and determination. During 2019, the Chair of the Compensation and Personnel Committee was a member of the Audit Committee. This membership overlap provided insight into the Company’s business risks and affords the Compensation and Personnel Committee access to the information necessary to consider the impact of business risks on compensation structure and pay practices.

Further, overall enterprise risk is considered and discussed at Board meetings, providing additional important information to the Compensation and Personnel Committee. The CEO attends those portions of the Compensation and Personnel Committee meetings at which plan features and design configurations of our annual and LTI plans are considered and approved.

We believe our executive compensation program appropriately balances risk with maximizing long-term shareholder value. The following features of our executive compensation program help to contribute to the achievement of this goal.

Emphasis on Long- Term Compensation | By granting long-term incentive compensation at 37% to 64% of our NEOs’ total compensation package, the Compensation and Personnel Committee believes that it is encouraging strategies that correlate with the long-term interests of the Company. Our LTI awards, described elsewhere in this Compensation Discussion and Analysis under the heading “2019 Long-Term Incentive Compensation,” feature a three-year vesting threshold at the senior vice president level and above, encouraging behavior focused on long-term value creation. PSUs focus on ITT’s three-year TSR and ROIC performance, encouraging behavior focused on long-term goals.
Pay Mix | 18% to 38% of total target compensation is fixed for NEOs while the remaining total compensation is tied to performance, consistent with our pay-for-performance philosophy. As scope of responsibility increases, the amount of performance-based pay increases and fixed pay decreases relative to other officers. Our incentive design provides multiple performance time frames and a variety of financial measures that are intended to drive profitable and sustained growth.
Clawback Policy | We have a policy that provides for recoupment of performance-based compensation, if the Board of Directors determines that a senior executive has engaged in fraud or willful misconduct that caused or otherwise contributed to the need for a material restatement of the Company’s financial results. In such a situation, the Board will review all compensation awarded to, or earned by, that senior executive on the basis of our financial performance during fiscal periods materially affected by the restatement. This would include annual cash incentive and bonus awards and all forms of equity-based compensation. If, in the Board’s view, the compensation related to our financial performance would have been lower if it had been based on the restated results, the Board will, to the extent permitted by applicable law, seek recoupment from that senior executive of any portion of such compensation as it deems appropriate after a review of all relevant facts and circumstances. The policy covers all executives that receive PSUs, including our NEOs.
Required Executive Stock Ownership | NEOs are required to own Company shares or share equivalents with a value equal to a multiple of their base salary, as discussed in more detail below. We believe that this requirement aligns their interests with the interests of the Company’s shareholders and also discourages behavior that is focused only on the short-term.
Prohibition Against Speculating, Hedging or Pledging Stock | We have a policy prohibiting employees from hedging and speculative trading in and out of the Company’s securities, including short sales and leverage transactions, such as puts, calls, and listed and unlisted options. We also prohibit employees from pledging Company securities as collateral for a loan.
Rule 10b5-1 Trading Plans | The Board of Directors has authorized the use by executive officers of prearranged trading plans under Rule 10b5-1 under the Exchange Act. Rule 10b5-1 permits insiders to adopt predetermined plans for selling specified amounts of stock or exercising stock options under specified conditions and at specified times. Executive officers may only enter into a trading plan during an open trading window and they must not possess material nonpublic information regarding the Company at the time they adopt the plan. Using trading plans, insiders can diversify their investment portfolios while avoiding concerns about transactions occurring at a time when they might possess material nonpublic information. Generally, under these trading plans, the individual relinquishes control over the transactions once the plan is put into place. Accordingly, sales may occur at any time, including possibly before, simultaneously with, or immediately after significant events involving the Company. Both new plans and modifications are subject to a mandatory “waiting period” designed to safeguard the plans from manipulation or market timing. Trading plans adopted by executive officers are reviewed and approved by the Legal Department.

ITT INC.❘ 2020 PROXY STATEMENT 51

Back to Contents

EXECUTIVE STOCK OWNERSHIP GUIDELINES

In 2019, the Compensation and Personnel Committee approved an increase of the stock ownership guidelines, which are expressed as a multiple of base salary:

■ Executive Vice Presidents: Increased from 3x to 4x

■ Senior Vice Presidents: Increased from 2x to 3x

The Company maintains stock ownership guidelines for all of its executive officers, including the NEOs. Executive officers have five years in order to meet the guidelines.

Stock ownership guidelines for officers specify the desired levels of Company stock ownership and encourage a set of behaviors for each officer to reach the guideline levels. The guidelines specify expected stock ownership levels expressed as a multiple of base salary, as set forth in the table below. Only the following equity holdings count toward achieving these ownership levels: shares owned outright, Company unvested RSUs, shares held in the Company’s dividend reinvestment plan, shares owned in the ITT Retirement Savings Plan, and “phantom” shares held in a fund that tracks an index of the Company’s stock in the deferred compensation plan. Stock options and unvested PSUs, which comprise a significant percentage of total compensation for the CEO and other NEOs, do not count towards the achievement of our executive stock ownership guidelines.

Until an executive has attained the ownership levels set forth in the guidelines, executives are prohibited from selling any restricted stock that vests and becomes unrestricted, as well as required to hold all shares acquired through the exercise of stock options (except to the extent necessary to meet tax and exercise price obligations). Both the guidelines, and compliance with the guidelines, are monitored periodically. As of December 31, 2019, all NEOs either have met the guidelines, or are on track to meet the guidelines. In 2019, the Compensation and Personnel Committee approved a request from Mr. Savi to sell shares solely to facilitate his purchase of a house near our corporate headquarters during his relocation from China to the United States.

Chief Executive Officer | 6 x Annual Base Salary
Executive Vice Presidents | 4 x Annual Base Salary
Senior Vice Presidents | 3 x Annual Base Salary
Selected Vice Presidents | 1 x Annual Base Salary

HEDGING POLICY

Our NEOs are subject to the Company’s hedging policy described at page 22.

CONSIDERATIONS OF TAX AND ACCOUNTING IMPACTS

In establishing total compensation for the executive officers, the Compensation and Personnel Committee has considered the effect of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code and the accounting rules associated with the Company’s compensation programs. As a general matter, Section 162(m) disallows a tax deduction for compensation over $1,000,000 paid for any fiscal year to the CEO, the CFO and the three other highest-paid NEOs. The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (the “Tax Act”) made several changes to Section 162(m), the most significant of which was removing an exception for “performance-based” compensation from the calculation of compensation subject to the $1,000,000 deduction limitation.

The primary objective of the Company’s compensation program is to support the Company’s business strategy. Prior to the adoption of the Tax Act, the Compensation and Personnel Committee generally sought to preserve the deductibility of most compensation paid to executive officers, but believed it also should have flexibility to award non-deductible compensation. As a result of the Tax Act’s elimination of the exception for performance-based compensation, the Compensation and Personnel Committee did not design the 2019 executive compensation program to preserve the deductibility of compensation that is paid to executive officers, as it did prior to the adoption of the Tax Act. The elimination of the performance-based pay exemption did not otherwise affect the Company’s 2019 executive compensation program.

ITT INC.❘ 2020 PROXY STATEMENT 52

Back to Contents

C OMPENSATION T ABLES

SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE

The following table provides information regarding the compensation earned by each of our NEOs.

Name and Principal Position | Year |  | Salary |  | Bonus |  | Stock Awards(1) |  | Non-Equity Incentive Plan Comp(2) |  | Change in Pension Value and Non-qualified Deferred Comp Earnings(3) |  | All Other Comp(4) |  | Total
Luca Savi Chief Executive Officer and President(5) | 2019 |  | $ | 900,000 |  | $ | — |  | $ | 3,498,822 |  | $ | 1,314,000 |  | $ | — |  | $ | 1,355,751 |  | $ | 7,068,573
2018 |  |  | 649,309 |  |  | — |  |  | 1,582,038 |  |  | 877,630 |  |  | — |  |  | 738,900 |  |  | 3,847,877
2017 |  |  | 539,575 |  |  | — |  |  | 1,112,329 |  |  | 697,131 |  |  | — |  |  | 604,058 |  |  | 2,953,093
Thomas M. Scalera Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer | 2019 |  |  | 538,135 |  |  | — |  |  | 1,093,625 |  |  | 550,800 |  |  | 14,167 |  |  | 88,142 |  |  | 2,284,869
2018 |  |  | 527,694 |  |  | — |  |  | 2,080,799 |  |  | 580,350 |  |  | — |  |  | 85,488 |  |  | 3,274,331
2017 |  |  | 512,692 |  |  | — |  |  | 980,005 |  |  | 571,650 |  |  | 8,359 |  |  | 73,535 |  |  | 2,146,241
Mary Beth Gustafsson Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary | 2019 |  |  | 480,174 |  |  | — |  |  | 820,519 |  |  | 502,490 |  |  | — |  |  | 75,576 |  |  | 1,878,759
2018 |  |  | 470,579 |  |  | — |  |  | 770,277 |  |  | 526,250 |  |  | — |  |  | 55,503 |  |  | 1,822,609
2017 |  |  | 457,923 |  |  | — |  |  | 741,553 |  |  | 524,400 |  |  | 2,412 |  |  | 58,766 |  |  | 1,785,054
Farrokh Batliwala Senior Vice President and President, Connect & Control Technologies | 2019 |  |  | 396,267 |  |  | — |  |  | 547,122 |  |  | 357,000 |  |  | — |  |  | 56,470 |  |  | 1,356,859
2018 |  |  | 378,462 |  |  | — |  |  | 464,103 |  |  | 430,350 |  |  | — |  |  | 46,041 |  |  | 1,318,956
Carlo Ghirardo(6) Senior Vice President and President, Motion Technologies | 2019 |  |  | 380,800 |  |  | 593,600 |  |  | 437,821 |  |  | 387,880 |  |  | — |  |  | 58,580 |  |  | 1,858,681

| (1) | Amounts include the aggregate grant date fair value computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718 for PSUs and RSUs. A discussion of the assumptions used in calculating these values may be found in Note 17 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in our 2019 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

| (2) | As described in the “2019 Annual Incentive Plan” section of the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the amounts reported reflect compensation earned for performance under the annual incentive compensation program for that year.

| (3) | The pension plan was frozen in 2011 and no additional benefits are being accrued, so the change in Mr. Scalera’s reported pension value is a result of changes to the actuarial assumptions used to calculate the present value of the benefits rather than an increase of the benefits. The actuarial assumptions used to calculate this amount can be found immediately after the 2019 Pension Benefits table.

| (4) | Amounts in this column for 2019 represent items specified in the All Other Compensation Table.

| (5) | Mr. Savi’s compensation was converted from euros to U.S. dollars based on the average exchange rate for the year Mr. Savi was paid. The exchange rates used were 1.12, 1.16, and 1.13 for 2019, 2018, and 2017, respectively.

| (6) | The payment of $593,600 for Mr. Ghirardo was made pursuant to his employment offer letter and intended as an inducement of employment to replace the value of unvested equity awards from his previous employer that he forfeited upon joining the Company in April 2018. Mr. Ghirardo’s compensation was converted from euros to U.S. dollars using a 2019 average exchange rate of 1.12.

ITT INC.❘ 2020 PROXY STATEMENT 53

Back to Contents

ALL OTHER COMPENSATION TABLE

|  | Luca Savi |  | Thomas M. Scalera |  | Mary Beth Gustafsson |  | Farrokh Batliwala |  | Carlo Ghirardo
Executive Perquisites: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Financial Counseling(1) |  | $ | — |  | $ | 9,000 |  | $ | 5,880 |  | $ | 9,150 |  | $ | —
Company Car(2) |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 4,418
Assignment and Relocation Expense(3) |  |  | 374,748 |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | —
Total Perquisites |  |  | 374,748 |  |  | 9,000 |  |  | 5,880 |  |  | 9,150 |  |  | 4,418
All Other Compensation: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Tax Reimbursements(4) |  |  | 410,751 |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | —
Insurance Benefits(5) |  |  | 993 |  |  | 880 |  |  | 2,224 |  |  | 417 |  |  | —
Statutory Vacation Payout(6) |  |  | 441,481 |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | —
Retirement Plan Contributions(7) |  |  | 127,778 |  |  | 78,262 |  |  | 67,472 |  |  | 46,903 |  |  | 54,162
Total All Other Compensation |  | $ | 1,355,751 |  | $ | 88,142 |  | $ | 75,576 |  | $ | 56,470 |  | $ | 58,580

| (1) | Amounts represent taxable financial and estate planning services fees paid during 2019.

| (2) | Mr. Ghirardo receives a company car, which is a common market practice in Italy. ITT does not provide a company car perquisite to executives in the U.S.

| (3) | Mr. Savi started an international assignment in China during 2015, which ended upon his relocation to the U.S. in July 2019. In connection with his assignment and pursuant to the ITT International Assignment policy, ITT provided allowances for the costs that Mr. Savi and his family incur in excess of their costs had they remained in Italy. The total amount includes: housing costs in China $64,752, costs for his children to attend school in China $71,632, cost of living and hardship allowances $47,278, transportation costs $18,911 and other assignment-related costs including China immigration fees. These allowances ceased when Mr. Savi and his family relocated to the U.S. and he is no longer eligible for assignment-related allowances. The cost for Mr. Savi’s relocation from China to the U.S. was $149,261. Mr. Savi’s assignment cost was converted from Chinese renminbi to U.S. dollars based on the 2019 average exchange rate of 0.142.

| (4) | Under ITT’s International Assignment policy, employees on assignment to another country maintain the tax treatment they would have received if they remained in their home country. Any incremental home or host country taxes associated with the assignment are paid by the Company. The Company paid $49,475 for taxes and gross-ups for Mr. Savi in connection with his assignment from Italy to China. In addition, Mr. Savi is a U.S. green card holder and as a result had a U.S. tax liability of $242,741 that was paid by the Company for the 2018 tax year. Mr. Savi’s relocation to the U.S. resulted in gross up of $118,535 for moving costs due to U.S. tax regulations. Tax gross-ups are only permitted as they relate to international assignments or relocation.

| (5) | Amounts include taxable group term-life insurance premiums attributable to each NEO. Mr. Savi’s insurance benefits include taxable amounts for medical, business trip, life and disability.

| (6) | Mr. Savi received a required statutory vacation payout for vacation accrued over 8 years. Payout of this amount was required under applicable Italian law. Amounts shown in table were converted from euro to U.S. dollars based on the 2019 average exchange rate of 1.12.

| (7) | Amounts represent the total employer contributions under the ITT Retirement Savings Plan and the ITT Supplemental Retirement Savings Plan. 2019 contributions to the ITT Retirement Savings Plan are: $17,491 for Mr. Savi, $19,568 for Mr. Scalera, $16,622 for Ms. Gustafsson and $14,106 for Mr. Batliwala. Contributions to the ITT Supplemental Retirement Savings Plan are discussed in the 2019 Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Table. The amounts for Mr. Savi and Mr. Ghirardo include the employer contribution to the Italian statutory termination indemnity fund (Previndai) that would be paid upon termination from the Company and have been converted from euros to U.S. dollars using a 2019 average exchange rate of 1.12. Mr. Savi will no longer accrue additional benefits under the Italian indemnity fund due to his relocation to the U.S.

ITT INC.❘ 2020 PROXY STATEMENT 54

Back to Contents

GRANTS OF PLAN-BASED AWARDS IN 2019

The following table provides information about 2019 equity and non-equity awards for the NEOs. The table includes the grant date for equity-based awards, the estimated future payouts under non-equity incentive plan awards (which consist of potential payouts under the 2019 AIP) and estimated future payouts under 2019 equity incentive plan awards, which consist of potential payouts related to the PSUs granted in 2019 for the 2019-2021 performance period. Also provided is the number of shares underlying all other stock awards, which for 2019 were composed solely of RSU awards. The grants in the following table were made under the 2011 Omnibus Incentive Plan.

|  |  |  | Estimated Future Payouts Under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards(1) |  | Estimated Future Payouts Under Equity Incentive Plan Awards(2) |  | All Other Stock Awards: |  | Grant Date Fair Value: Equity
Name |  | Grant Date |  | Threshold ($) |  | Target ($) |  | Maximum ($) |  |  | Threshold (#) |  | Target (#) |  | Maximum (#) |  |  | Number of Shares of Stock or Units(3) (#) |  | Incentive Plan Awards(4) ($)
Luca Savi |  | 3/4/2019 |  | 450,000 |  | 900,000 |  | 1,800,000 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
|  | 3/4/2019 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 16,963 |  | 33,925 |  | 67,850 |  |  |  |  | 2,218,695
|  | 3/4/2019 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 21,935 |  | 1,280,127
Thomas M. Scalera |  | 3/4/2019 |  | 202,500 |  | 405,000 |  | 810,000 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
|  | 3/4/2019 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 5,303 |  | 10,605 |  | 21,210 |  |  |  |  | 693,567
|  | 3/4/2019 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 6,855 |  | 400,058
Mary Beth Gustafsson |  | 3/4/2019 |  | 180,750 |  | 361,500 |  | 723,000 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
|  | 3/4/2019 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 3,978 |  | 7,955 |  | 15,910 |  |  |  |  | 520,257
|  | 3/4/2019 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 5,145 |  | 300,262
Farrokh Batliwala |  | 3/4/2019 |  | 150,000 |  | 300,000 |  | 600,000 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
|  | 3/4/2019 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 2,653 |  | 5,305 |  | 10,610 |  |  |  |  | 346,947
|  | 3/4/2019 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 3,430 |  | 200,175
Carlo Ghirardo |  | 3/4/2019 |  | 134,680 |  | 269,360 |  | 538,720 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
|  | 3/4/2019 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 2,123 |  | 4,245 |  | 8,490 |  |  |  |  | 277,623
|  | 3/4/2019 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 2,745 |  | 160,198

| (1) | Amounts reflect the threshold, target and maximum payment levels, respectively, if an award payout is achieved under the AIP. These potential payments are based on achievement of specific performance metrics and are completely at risk. The AIP target award is computed based upon the applicable range of net estimated payments denominated in dollars where the target award is equal to 100% of the award potential, the threshold is equal to 50% of target, and the maximum is equal to 200% of target. Zero payment is possible for performance below the threshold. Mr. Ghirardo’s amounts have been converted from euros to U.S. Dollars using the 2019 average exchange rate of 1.12.

| (2) | Amounts reflect the threshold, target and maximum unit levels, respectively,of potential PSU award payouts. These potential unit amounts are based on achievement of specific performance metrics and are completely at risk. The PSU is computed based upon the applicable range of net estimated payments denominated in units where the target award is equal to 100% of the award potential, the threshold is equal to 50% of target and the maximum is equal to 200% of target.

| (3) | Amounts reflect RSU awards granted in 2019 to the NEOs.

| (4) | Amounts represent the aggregate grant date fair value computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718 for PSU and RSU awards granted to the NEOs in 2019. A discussion of assumptions relating to these LTI awards may be found in Note 17 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in our 2019 Form 10-K.

ITT INC.❘ 2020 PROXY STATEMENT 55

Back to Contents

OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT 2019 FISCAL YEAR END

|  | Option Awards |  | Stock Awards
Name | Grant Date | Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options Exercisable (#) | Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options Unexercisable(1) (#) | Equity Incentive Plan Award: Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Unearned Options (#) | Option Exercise Price ($) | Option Expiration Date |  | Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested(2) (#) | Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested(3) ($) | Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested(2) (#) | Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market or Payout Value of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested(3) ($)
Luca Savi | 3/8/2012 | 13,295 | — | — | 22.80 | 3/8/2022 |  | — | — | — | —
| 3/5/2013 | 10,290 | — | — | 26.76 | 3/5/2023 |  | — | — | — | —
| 3/4/2014 | 6,385 | — | — | 43.52 | 3/4/2024 |  | — | — | — | —
| 2/25/2015 | 7,095 | — | — | 41.52 | 2/25/2025 |  | — | — | — | —
| 2/19/2016 | 16,520 | — | — | 33.01 | 2/19/2026 |  | — | — | — | —
| 2/23/2017 | — | — | — | — | — |  | 12,600 | 931,266 | 20,980 | 1,550,632
| 2/26/2018 | — | — | — | — | — |  | 14,080 | 1,040,653 | 7,260 | 536,587
| 3/4/2019 | — | — | — | — | — |  | 21,935 | 1,621,216 | 16,963 | 1,253,735
Thomas M. Scalera | 2/23/2017 | — | — | — | — | — |  | 11,100 | 820,401 | 18,486 | 1,366,300
2/26/2018 | — | — | — | — | — |  | 9,155 | 676,646 | 4,720 | 348,855
| 8/6/2018 | — | — | — | — | — |  | 8,055 | 595,345 | 4,115 | 304,140
| 3/4/2019 | — | — | — | — | — |  | 6,855 | 506,653 | 5,303 | 391,945
Mary Beth Gustafsson | 3/4/2014 | 13,405 | — | — | 43.52 | 3/4/2024 |  | — | — | — | —
2/25/2015 | 14,185 |  | — | 41.52 | 2/25/2025 |  | — | — | — | —
| 2/19/2016 | 18,585 | — | — | 33.01 | 2/19/2026 |  | — | — | — | —
| 2/23/2017 | — | — | — | — | — |  | 8,400 | 620,844 | 13,987 | 1,033,779
| 2/26/2018 | — | — | — | — | — |  | 6,855 | 506,653 | 3,535 | 261,272
| 3/4/2019 | — | — | — | — | — |  | 5,145 | 380,267 | 3,978 | 294,014
Farrokh Batliwala | 2/23/2017 | — | — | — | — | — |  | 5,100 | 376,941 | 8,493 | 627,718
2/26/2018 | — | — | — | — | — |  | 4,130 | 305,248 | 2,130 | 157,428
| 3/4/2019 | — | — | — | — | — |  | 3,430 | 253,511 | 2,653 | 196,083
Carlo Ghirardo | 4/9/2018 | — | — | — | — | — |  | 4,090 | 302,292 | 1,935 | 143,016
4/9/2018 | — | — | — | — | — |  | 5,285 | 390,614 | — | —
| 3/4/2019 | — | — | — | — | — |  | 2,745 | 202,883 | 2,123 | 156,911

| (1) | Stock options vest on the third anniversary of the grant date and expire 10 years after the grant date.

| (2) | RSUs generally vest 100% on the third anniversary of the grant date. Mr. Ghirardo’s award of 5,285 RSUs granted on April 9, 2018 was granted to offset forfeited stock awards at his previous employer and vest two years after the grant date. PSUs vest upon the completion of a three-year performance period beginning January 1 of the grant year and are shown at threshold payout, with the exception of the PSUs granted on February 23, 2017, which are shown at 160.4% of target based on the actual three-year relative TSR and relative ROIC results.

| (3) | Reflects the Company’s closing stock price of $73.91 on December 31, 2019. Under the Equity Incentive Plan Awards column, the 2017 PSUs granted on February 23, 2017 vested on December 31, 2019 and are shown at 160.4% of target based on three-year TSR and ROIC results.

ITT INC.❘ 2020 PROXY STATEMENT 56

Back to Contents

OPTION EXERCISES AND STOCK VESTED IN 2019

The following table provides information regarding the values realized by our NEOs upon the exercise of stock options and the vesting of stock awards in 2019.

|  |  | Option Awards |  | Stock Awards
Named Executive Officer |  | # of Shares Acquired on Exercise |  | Value Realized on Exercise |  | # of Shares Acquired on Vesting |  | Value Realized on Vesting |
Luca Savi |  | — |  | $ | — |  |  | 16,540 |  | $ | 955,781 |
Thomas M. Scalera |  | 56,065 |  |  | 1,307,814 |  |  | 24,813 |  |  | 1,433,840 |
Mary Beth Gustafsson |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 21,640 |  |  | 1,245,257 |
Farrokh Batliwala |  | 8,950 |  |  | 253,881 |  |  | 8,967 |  |  | 518,165 |
Carlo Ghirardo |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |

2019 PENSION BENEFITS

Effective on October 31, 2011, all of the Company’s pension benefits described in this section were frozen, and the cumulative liability of these benefits was assumed by Exelis Inc. Only Mr. Scalera participated in the plans described below and remains eligible for frozen pension benefits under the ITT Salaried Retirement Plan.

ITT SALARIED RETIREMENT PLAN

Under the ITT Salaried Retirement Plan, participants had the option, on an annual basis, to elect to be covered under either a Traditional Pension Plan or a Pension Equity Plan formula for future pension accruals. The ITT Salaried Retirement Plan was a funded and tax-qualified retirement program. The plan is described in detail below. While the Traditional Pension Plan formula paid benefits on a monthly basis after retirement, the Pension Equity Plan formula enabled participants to elect to have benefits paid as a single sum payment upon employment termination, regardless of the participant’s age. The Traditional Pension Plan benefit payable to an employee depended upon the date an employee first became a participant under the plan.

TRADITIONAL PENSION PLAN

A participant first employed prior to January 1, 2000, under the Traditional Pension Plan would receive an annual pension that would be the total of:

| ■ | 2% of his or her average final compensation (as defined below) for each of the first 25 years of benefit service, plus

| ■ | 1.5% of his or her average final compensation for each of the next 15 years of benefit service, reduced by

| ■ | 1.25% of his or her primary Social Security benefit for each year of benefit service up to a maximum of 40 years.

A participant first employed on or after January 1, 2000, under the Traditional Pension Plan would receive an annual pension that would equal:

| ■ | 1.5% of his or her average final compensation for each year of benefit service up to 40 years, reduced by

| ■ | 1.25% of his or her primary Social Security benefit for each year of benefit service up to a maximum of 40 years.

For a participant first employed prior to January 1, 2005, average final compensation (including salary and approved bonus or AIP awards) is the total of:

| ■ | The participant’s average annual base salary for the five calendar years of the last 120 consecutive calendar months of eligibility service that would result in the highest average annual base salary amount, plus

| ■ | The participant’s average annual pension eligible compensation, not including base salary, for the five calendar years of the participant’s last 120 consecutive calendar months of eligibility service that would result in the highest average annual compensation amount.

For a participant first employed on or after January 1, 2005, average final compensation is the average of the participant’s total pension eligible compensation (salary, bonus and annual incentive payments for NEOs and other exempt salaried employees) over the highest five consecutive calendar years of the participant’s final 120 months of eligibility service.

ITT INC.❘ 2020 PROXY STATEMENT 57

Back to Contents

As it applies to participants first employed prior to January 1, 2000, under the Traditional Pension Plan, Standard Early Retirement is available to employees at least 55 years of age with 10 years of eligibility service. Special Early Retirement is available to employees at least age 55 with 15 years of eligibility service or at least age 50 whose age plus total eligibility service equals at least 80. For Standard Early Retirement, if payments begin before age 65, payments from anticipated payments at the normal retirement age of 65 (the “Normal Retirement Age”) are reduced by one-fourth of one percent for each month that payments commence prior to the Normal Retirement Age. For Special Early Retirement, if payments begin between ages 60- 64, benefits will be payable at 100%. If payments begin prior to age 60, they are reduced by five-twelfths of one percent for each month that payments start before age 60 but not more than 25%. For participants first employed from January 1, 2000 through December 31, 2004, under the Traditional Pension Plan, Standard Early Retirement was available as described above. Special Early Retirement was also available to employees who attained at least age 55 with 15 years of eligibility service (but not earlier than age 55). For Special Early Retirement, the benefit payable at or after age 62 would be at 100%; if payments commenced prior to age 62 they would be reduced by five-twelfths of one percent for each of the first 48 months prior to age 62 and by an additional four twelfths of one percent for each of the next 12 months and by an additional three-twelfths of one percent for each month prior to age 57.

For participants first employed on or after January 1, 2005, and who retire before age 65, benefits may commence at or after age 55 but they would be reduced by five ninths of one percent for each of the first 60 months prior to age 65 and an additional five eighteenths of one percent for each month prior to age 60.

PENSION EQUITY PLAN

A participant under the Pension Equity Plan would receive a single sum pension that would equal the total accumulated percentage (as described below) times final average compensation (as defined above). Total accumulated percentage is the sum of annual percentages earned for each year of benefit service. The percentage earned for any given year of benefit service ranges from three percent to six percent based on age:

| ■ | Under age 30: 3% per year of benefit service

| ■ | Age 30 to age 39: 4% per year of benefit service

| ■ | Age 40 to age 49: 5% per year of benefit service

| ■ | Age 50 and over: 6% per year of benefit service

Effective January 1, 2008, the ITT Salaried Retirement Plan was amended to provide for a three-year vesting requirement. In addition, for employees who were already vested and who were involuntarily terminated and entitled to severance payments from the Company, additional months of age and service (not to exceed 24 months) were to be imputed based on the employee’s actual service to his or her last day worked, solely for purposes of determining eligibility for early retirement.

The 2019 Pension Benefits table provides information on the pension benefits for the NEOs. Mr. Scalera participated under the terms of the plan in effect for employees hired after January 1, 2005. The Traditional Pension Plan accumulated benefit an employee earned over his or her career with the Company is payable on a monthly basis starting after retirement. Employees may retire as early as age 50 under the terms of the plan. Pensions may be reduced if retirement starts before age 65. Possible pension reductions are described above. The Pension Equity Plan benefit can be received as a lump sum or an annuity following termination. Mr. Scalera participated in the Pension Equity Plan formula prior to 2011. Benefits under this plan are subject to the limitations imposed under Sections 415 and 401(a)(17) of the Internal Revenue Code in effect as of December 31, 2011. Section 415 limits the amount of annual pension payable from a qualified plan. For 2019, this limit is $225,000 per year for a single-life annuity payable at an IRS-prescribed retirement age. This ceiling may be actuarially adjusted in accordance with IRS rules for items such as employee contributions, other forms of distribution and different annuity starting dates. Section 401(a) (17) limits the amount of compensation that may be recognized in the determination of a benefit under a qualified plan. For 2019, this limit is $280,000.

2019 PENSION BENEFITS TABLE

Named Executive Officer |  | Plan Name |  | Number of Years Credit Service (#) |  | Present Value of Accumulated Benefit at Earliest Date for Unreduced Benefit ($) |  | Payments During Last Fiscal Year ($)
Luca Savi(1) |  | ITT Salaried Retirement Plan |  | N/A |  |  | N/A |  |  | N/A |
Thomas M. Scalera(2) |  | ITT Salaried Retirement Plan |  | 5.77 |  |  | 65,370 |  |  | — |
Mary Beth Gustafsson(3) |  | ITT Salaried Retirement Plan |  | N/A |  |  | N/A |  |  | N/A |
Farrokh Batliwala(3) |  | ITT Salaried Retirement Plan |  | N/A |  |  | N/A |  |  | N/A |
Carlo Ghirardo(4) |  | ITT Salaried Retirement Plan |  | N/A |  |  | N/A |  |  | N/A |

| (1) | As previously described, Mr. Savi became eligible for U.S. benefits in 2019 and is not eligible for pension, however, he continues to have a statutory retirement benefit under Italian law for his previous ITT service in Italy.

| (2) | Mr. Scalera has an accrued benefit under both the Traditional Pension Plan formula and the Pension Equity Plan formula. His lump sum Pension Equity Plan benefit is $52,918 under the ITT Salaried Retirement Plan as of December 31, 2019.

| (3) | Ms. Gustafsson and Mr. Batliwala were hired after October 31, 2011, the date on which the plans were frozen, therefore they are not eligible to participate in the plans.

| (4) | Mr. Ghirardo receives statutory retirement benefits under Italian law and other benefits applicable to Dirigenti employees.

ITT INC.❘ 2020 PROXY STATEMENT 58

Back to Contents

Assumptions used to determine present value as of December 31, 2019 are generally consistent with those used by L3Harris Technologies Inc. (the ultimate owner of the ITT Salaried Retirement Plan from Exelis Inc.). The assumptions utilized were as follows:

| ■ | Measurement date: December 31, 2019

| ■ | Discount Rate: 3.11%

| ■ | Mortality (pre-commencement): None

| ■ | Mortality (post-commencement): Pri-2012 Healthy Annuitant Mortality Tables, separate rates for males and females

| ■ | Mortality projection (post-commencement): Generational projection with MP-2019 Mortality Improvement Scale from 2012.

| ■ | Normal retirement date: age 65

| ■ | Unreduced retirement date: age 65

| ■ | Assumed benefit commencement date: age 65

| ■ | Accumulated benefit is calculated based on credited service and pay as of October 31, 2011

| ■ | For benefits under the Traditional Pension Plan formula, present value is based on the single life annuity payable at assumed benefit commencement date.

| ■ | For benefits under the Pension Equity Plan formula, present value is based on projected lump sum value at assumed benefit commencement date; Pension Equity Plan value is projected from December 31, 2019, to age 65 using an interest crediting rate of 1.55% for the ITT Salaried Retirement Plan.

| ■ | All results shown are estimates only; actual benefits will be based on precise credited service and compensation history, which will be determined at benefit commencement date.

2019 NONQUALIFIED DEFERRED COMPENSATION

ITT DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN

The ITT Deferred Compensation Plan is a tax deferral plan that was frozen to new deferrals effective as of 2020. The ITT Deferred Compensation Plan permitted eligible employees with a base salary of at least $200,000 to defer between 2% and 90% of their AIP payment. The AIP amount deferred is included in the Summary Compensation Table under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation. Withdrawals under the plan are available on payment dates elected by participants at the time of the deferral election. The withdrawal election is irrevocable, except in cases of demonstrated hardship due to an unforeseeable emergency as provided by the ITT Deferred Compensation Plan. Amounts deferred will be unsecured general obligations of the Company to pay the deferred compensation in the future and employees will have the rights of an unsecured general creditor with respect to those funds.

Participants can elect to have their account balances allocated into one or more of the 25 phantom investment funds (including a phantom Company stock fund) and can change their investment allocations on a daily basis. All plan accounts are maintained on the accounts of the Company and investment earnings are credited to a participant’s account (and charged to corporate earnings) to mirror the investment returns achieved by the investment funds chosen by that participant.

A participant can establish up to six “accounts” into which AIP award deferrals are credited and he or she can elect a different form of payment and a different payment commencement date for each “account.” One account may be selected based on a termination date (the “Termination Account”) and five accounts are based on employee-specified dates (each a “Special Purpose Account”). Each Special Purpose Account and Termination Account may have different investment and payment options. Termination Accounts will be paid in the seventh month following the last day worked. Changes to Special Purpose Account distribution elections must be made at least 12 months before any existing benefit payment date, may not take effect for at least 12 months, and must postpone the existing benefit payment date by at least five years. Additionally, Termination Account distribution elections are irrevocable.

ITT INC.❘ 2020 PROXY STATEMENT 59

Back to Contents

The table below shows the annual rate of return for the funds available under the ITT Deferred Compensation Plan, as reported by the administrator for the calendar year ended December 31, 2019.

Name of Fund |  | Rate of Return 1/1/19 to 12/31/19 |  |  | Name of Fund |  | Rate of Return 1/1/19 to 12/31/19 |
Fixed Rate Option(1) |  | 3.00 | % |  | American Funds EuroPacific Growth (REREX) |  | 26.98 | %
PIMCO Total Return Institutional (PTTRX) |  | 8.26 | % |  | First Eagle Overseas A (SGOVX) |  | 17.61 | %
PIMCO Real Return Institutional (PRRIX) |  | 8.52 | % |  | Lazard Emerging Markets Equity Open (LZOEX) |  | 17.73 | %
T Rowe Price High Yield (PRHYX) |  | 14.66 | % |  | Clearbrige Small Cap Growth IS (LMOIX) |  | 25.78 | %
Dodge & Cox Stock (DODGX) |  | 24.83 | % |  | DFA US Targeted Value I (DFFVX) |  | 21.47 | %
American Funds Growth Fund of America R4 (RGAEX) |  | 28.10 | % |  | Invesco Global Real Estate A (AGREX) |  | 22.47 | %
Vanguard 500 Index Admiral (VFIAX) |  | 31.46 | % |  | Model Portfolio(2) — Conservative |  | 10.59 | %
Vanguard Selected Value Inv (VASVX) |  | 29.54 | % |  | Model Portfolio(2) — Moderate Conservative |  | 15.03 | %
Artisan Mid Cap (ARTMX) |  | 38.12 | % |  | Model Portfolio(2) — Moderate |  | 18.89 | %
Hartford Schroders Int’l Multi-Cap Value S (SIDRX) |  | 18.56 | % |  | Model Portfolio(2) — Moderate Aggressive |  | 22.29 | %
Vanguard Federal Money Market Inv (VMFXX) |  | 2.14 | % |  | Model Portfolio(2) — Aggressive |  | 25.68 | %
Vanguard Total Bond Market Index Adm (VBTLX) |  | 8.71 | % |  | ITT Stock Fund (ITT) |  | 54.58 | %
Vanguard Developed Markets Index Adm (VTMGX) |  | 22.05 | % |  |  |  |  |

(1) | The Fixed Rate Option rate is based on guaranteed contractual returns from the insurance company provider.
(2) | The returns shown in the model portfolio are not subsidized by the Company, but represent returns for a managed portfolio based on funds available to deferred compensation participants.

ITT SUPPLEMENTAL RETIREMENT SAVINGS PLAN.

Since federal law limits the amount of compensation that can be used to determine employee and employer contribution amounts to the tax-qualified plan ($280,000 in 2019), the Company has established and maintains a non-qualified unfunded ITT Supplemental Retirement Savings Plan to allow for Company contributions based on base salary and actual annual bonus paid in excess of these limits. All balances under this plan are maintained on the books of the Company and earnings are credited to the accumulated savings under the plan based on the earnings in the Stable Value Fund in the tax-qualified plan. Benefits will be paid in a lump sum in the seventh month following the last day worked. Effective January 1, 2012, the plan was amended to no longer permit employee contributions.

ITT INC.❘ 2020 PROXY STATEMENT 60

Back to Contents

2019 NONQUALIFIED DEFERRED COMPENSATION TABLE

The table below shows nonqualified deferred compensation activity for the NEOs for 2019.

Name | Executive Contributions Last Fiscal Year(1) |  | Registrant Contributions Last Fiscal Year(2) |  | Aggregate Earnings Last Fiscal Year |  | Aggregate Withdrawals/ Distributions |  | Aggregate Balance at Last Fiscal Year End
Luca Savi |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Non-qualified savings | $ | — |  | $ | 6,327 |  | $ | 6 |  | $ | — |  | $ | 6,333
Deferred compensation |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | —
TOTAL | $ | — |  | $ | 6,327 |  | $ | 6 |  | $ | — |  | $ | 6,333
Thomas M. Scalera |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Non-qualified savings | $ | — |  | $ | 58,694 |  | $ | 7,478 |  | $ | — |  | $ | 364,375
Deferred compensation |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | —
TOTAL | $ | — |  | $ | 58,694 |  | $ | 7,478 |  | $ | — |  | $ | 364,375
Mary Beth Gustafsson |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Non-qualified savings | $ | — |  | $ | 50,850 |  | $ | 3,143 |  | $ | — |  | $ | 164,475
Deferred compensation |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 139,631 |  |  | — |  |  | 1,200,597
TOTAL | $ | — |  | $ | 50,850 |  | $ | 142,774 |  | $ | — |  | $ | 1,365,072
Farrokh Batliwala |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Non-qualified savings | $ | — |  | $ | 32,797 |  | $ | 1,426 |  | $ | — |  | $ | 79,487
Deferred compensation |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | —
TOTAL | $ | — |  | $ | 32,797 |  | $ | 1,426 |  | $ | — |  | $ | 79,487
Caro Ghirardo |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Non-qualified savings | $ | — |  | $ | — |  | $ | — |  | $ | — |  | $ | —
Deferred compensation |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | —
TOTAL | $ | — |  | $ | — |  | $ | — |  | $ | — |  | $ | —

Note: “Non-qualified savings” represent amounts in the ITT Supplemental Retirement Savings Plan. “Deferred compensation” earnings under the ITT Deferred Compensation Plan are calculated by reference to actual earnings of the investment funds as provided in the table above.

| (1) | None of the NEOs elected to defer their 2018 bonus that was paid in March 2019 under the ITT Deferred Compensation Plan.

| (2) | Amounts represent the core, match and applicable transition employer contributions into the ITT Supplemental Retirement Savings Plan (Non-qualified savings) and the ITT Deferred Compensation Plan (Deferred compensation).

ITT INC.❘ 2020 PROXY STATEMENT 61

Back to Contents

POTENTIAL POST-EMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION

The potential post-employment compensation tables reflect the amount of compensation payable to each of the NEOs in the event their ITT employment ceases, including voluntary termination, termination for cause, death or disability, termination without cause, or termination in connection with a change of control. Post-separation compensation of our NEOs, other than Mr. Ghirardo, is governed by the ITT Senior Executive Severance Pay Plan. In addition, post-separation compensation of all of our NEOs is governed by the ITT Senior Executive Change in Control Severance Pay Plan (applicable to situations involving a change of control) and our equity award agreements. In the case of Mr. Scalera, the length of his severance benefit is specified in a 2011 employment letter entered into at the time of the Spin Transaction.

The amounts shown in the potential post-employment compensation tables are estimates, assuming that the triggering event occurred on December 31, 2019, including amounts that would be earned through such date (or that would be earned during a period of severance), and where applicable, are based on the closing price of the Company’s stock on December 31, 2019, the last trading day of 2019, which was $73.91.

The actual amounts to be paid out can only be determined at the time of such executive’s separation from the Company.

PAYMENTS AND BENEFITS PROVIDED GENERALLY TO SALARIED EMPLOYEES

The amounts shown in the tables in this section do not include payments and benefits to the extent these payments and benefits are provided on a non-discriminatory basis to salaried employees generally upon termination of employment. These include:

| ■ | Accrued salary and vacation pay.

| ■ | Regular pension benefits under the ITT Salaried Retirement Plan (frozen as of the date of the Spin Transaction and transferred to L3Harris Technologies Inc.). ITT participants do not accrue any additional service credit under the plan in the event of a termination. See the section “Post-Employment Compensation” in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis for more information.

| ■ | Health care benefits provided to retirees under the ITT Salaried Retirement Plan, including retiree medical and dental insurance (if eligible as of the date of the Spin Transaction). Employees who terminate prior to retirement are eligible for continued benefits under COBRA.

| ■ | Distributions of plan balances under the ITT Retirement Savings Plan and amounts under the ITT Supplemental Retirement Savings Plan.

No perquisites are available to any NEOs in any of the post-employment compensation circumstances. With respect to the ITT Salaried Retirement Plan, frozen benefits under such plan may be deferred to age 65, but may become payable at early retirement age, or earlier for benefits under the Pension Equity Plan formula. Employees of the Company do not have to terminate employment in order to receive their benefits from the ITT Salaried Retirement Plan since the plan is now sponsored by L3Harris Technologies Inc.

ITT SENIOR EXECUTIVE SEVERANCE PAY PLAN

The ITT Senior Executive Severance Pay Plan provides overall cash severance benefits to executives, provides participants with outplacement assistance for one year and does not allow for the vesting of equity awards during the severance period. The amount of severance pay under this plan depends on the executive’s base pay and years of service, not to exceed 12 months of base pay. The Company considers these severance pay provisions appropriate transitional provisions given the job responsibilities and competitive market in which senior executives function.

No severance is provided if an employee is terminated for cause, because the Company believes employees terminated for cause should not receive additional compensation.

In addition, the Company’s obligation to continue severance payments stops if the executive does not comply with the Company’s Code of Conduct. We consider this cessation provision to be critical to the Company’s emphasis on ethical behavior. The Company’s obligation to continue severance payments also stops if the executive does not comply with non-competition provisions of the ITT Senior Executive Severance Pay Plan. These provisions protect the integrity of our businesses and are consistent with typical commercial arrangements.

If a covered executive receives or is entitled to receive other compensation from another company, the amount of that other compensation could be used to offset amounts otherwise payable under the ITT Senior Executive Severance Pay Plan. For six months following the termination date, the executive will continue to be eligible for healthcare benefits and for 12 months the executive will entitled to outplacement support. Severance pay will start within 60 days following the covered executive’s scheduled termination date.

ITT INC.❘ 2020 PROXY STATEMENT 62

Back to Contents

ITT SENIOR EXECUTIVE CHANGE IN CONTROL SEVERANCE PAY PLAN

This plan provides two levels of benefits for covered executives, based on their position within the Company. The Compensation and Personnel Committee considered two levels of benefits appropriate based on the relative ability of each level of employee to influence future Company performance. Executive Vice Presidents and Senior Vice Presidents receive the higher level and certain Vice Presidents the second level. Under the ITT Senior Executive Change in Control Severance Pay Plan, if a covered executive is terminated within two years of a change in control or in contemplation of a change in control event that ultimately occurs or if the covered executive terminates his or her employment for good reason within two years of a change in control, he or she would be entitled to:

| ■ | Any accrued but unpaid base salary, bonus (AIP award), vacation and unreimbursed expenses;

| ■ | Two or three times the current base salary and target annual incentive as of the termination date;

| ■ | A lump sum payment equal to two or three times the highest annual base salary rate during the three years preceding termination or an acceleration event times the highest percentage rate of the Company’s contributions to the ITT Retirement Savings Plan and the ITT Supplemental Retirement Savings Plan, such percentage rate not to exceed 7% per year;

| ■ | Subsidized healthcare benefits for six months after termination; and

| ■ | One year of outplacement assistance.

All of the NEOs are covered at the highest level of benefits.

CHANGE IN CONTROL ARRANGEMENTS

There are change in control provisions in various Company plans, which were adopted to mitigate the concern that, in the event the Company is considering a change in control transaction, the employees involved in considering the transaction might otherwise be motivated to act in their own interests rather than in the interests of the shareholders.

The payment or vesting of awards or benefits under certain of the plans listed below are accelerated solely upon the occurrence of a change in control of the Company. As described on the next page, our equity plans and our severance pay plans have “double triggers,” requiring both a change in control and a termination of employment to accelerate the vesting of unvested awards.

The following Company plans have change in control provisions:

| ■ | 2011 Omnibus Incentive Plan

| ■ | 2003 Equity Incentive Plan

| ■ | ITT Annual Incentive Plan for Executive Officers

| ■ | ITT Senior Executive Change in Control Severance Pay Plan

| ■ | ITT Change in Control Severance Pay Plan

| ■ | ITT Deferred Compensation Plan

| ■ | ITT Supplemental Retirement Savings Plan

The 2011 Omnibus Incentive Plan, 2003 Equity Incentive Plan, ITT Annual Incentive Plan for Executive Officers, ITT Senior Executive Change in Control Severance Pay Plan, and ITT Change in Control Severance Pay Plan consider a change in control to have occurred if one of the following acceleration events occurs:

| 1. | A report on Schedule 13D was filed with the SEC disclosing that any person, other than the Company or one of its subsidiaries or any employee benefit plan that is sponsored by the Company or a subsidiary, had become the beneficial owner of 20% or more of the Company’s outstanding stock.

| 2. | A person other than the Company or one of its subsidiaries or any employee benefit plan that is sponsored by the Company or a subsidiary purchased the Company’s shares in connection with a tender or exchange offer, if after consummation of the offer the person purchasing the shares is the beneficial owner of 20% or more of the Company’s outstanding stock.

| 3. | The shareholders of the Company approved, and the Company fully executed:

| (a) | Any consolidation, business combination or merger of the Company other than a consolidation, business combination or merger in which the shareholders of the Company immediately prior to the merger would hold 50% or more of the combined voting power of the Company or the surviving corporation of the merger and would have the same proportionate ownership of common stock of the surviving corporation that they held in the Company immediately prior to the merger; or

| (b) | Any sale, lease, exchange or other transfer of all or substantially all of the assets of the Company.

| 4. | A majority of the members of the Board of Directors of the Company changed within a 12 month period, unless the election or nomination for election of each of the new directors by the Company’s shareholders had been approved by two-thirds of the directors still in office who had been directors at the beginning of the 12 month period or whose nomination for election or election was recommended or approved by a majority of directors who were directors at the beginning of the 12 month period.

| 5. | Any person other than the Company or one of its subsidiaries or any employee benefit plan sponsored by the Company or a subsidiary became the beneficial owner of 20% or more of the Company’s outstanding stock.

ITT INC.❘ 2020 PROXY STATEMENT 63

Back to Contents

The ITT Supplemental Retirement Savings Plan and ITT Deferred Compensation Plan consider a change in control to have occurred if one of the following acceleration events occurs:

| 1. | A majority of the members of the Board of Directors of the Company changed within a 12-month period, unless the election or nomination for election of each of the new directors by the Company’s shareholders had been approved by two-thirds of the directors still in office who had been directors at the beginning of the 12-month period or whose nomination for election or election was recommended or approved by a majority of directors who were directors at the beginning of the 12-month period.

| 2. | Any one person, or more than one person acting as a group (as defined in Treasury Regs. 1.409A-2(i)(5)(v)(B)), acquires ownership of shares that, together with shares held by such person or group constitutes more than 50% of the total fair market value or total voting power of the shares of the Corporation.

| 3. | Either (i) a person, or more than one person acting as a group (as defined in Treasury Regs. 1.409A-2(i)(5)(v)(B)), acquires ownership of shares possessing 30% or more of the total voting power of the shares of the Corporation, taking into account all such shares acquired during the 12-month period ending on the date of the most recent acquisition, or (ii) a majority of the members of the Board of Directors is replaced during any 12-month period by directors whose appointment or election is not endorsed by a majority of the members of such Board of Directors prior to the date of the appointment or election, but only if no other corporation is a majority shareholder.

| 4. | A change in the ownership of a substantial portion of assets occurs on the date on which any one person, or more than one person acting as a group (as defined in Treasury Regs. 1.409A-2(i)(5)(v)(B)), other than a person or group of persons that is related to the Company, acquires assets that have a total gross fair market value equal to or more than 40% of the total gross fair market value of all of the assets of the Company immediately prior to such acquisition or acquisitions, taking into account all such assets acquired during the 12-month period ending on the date of the most recent acquisition.

Beginning with the Company’s annual grant cycle in March 2014, all long-term incentive awards (PSUs, RSUs and stock options) have included a “double trigger” provision, whereby no benefits will be paid to an executive unless (i) a change in control of the Company has occurred and (ii) there has been a specified change in the employment status of the executive within a period of time following the change in control. For example, if a covered executive is terminated without cause within two years of a change in control or terminates his or her employment for good reason within two years of a change in control, or is terminated before the change in control occurs, but after its announcement or at the request of a participant, he or she would be entitled to vesting of long-term incentive awards pursuant to the award agreements. The ITT Senior Executive Change in Control Severance Plan and ITT Change in Control Severance Pay Plan also have double trigger provisions. We utilize “double trigger” vesting to ensure management talent will be available to assist in the successful integration following a change in control and to align with prevailing governance practices.

ITT INC.❘ 2020 PROXY STATEMENT 64

Back to Contents

Potential post-employment compensation arrangements are more fully described for the NEOs in the following table. As noted above, this table assumes a triggering event as of December 31, 2019.

|  | Resignation or Termination for Cause |  | Death or Disability |  | Termination Not For Cause |  | Termination Not For Cause or With Good Reason After Change of Control
Luca Savi |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Cash Severance(1) |  | $ | — |  | $ | — |  | $ | 900,000 |  | $ | 2,700,000
AIP |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 2,700,000
Unvested Equity Awards(2) |  |  | — |  |  | 8,724,360 |  |  | 5,022,691 |  |  | 10,887,024
ITT Supplemental Retirement Savings Plan(3) |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 189,000
Other Benefits(4) |  |  | 635,713 |  |  | 635,713 |  |  | 675,728 |  |  | 675,728
TOTAL(5) |  | $ | 635,713 |  | $ | 9,360,073 |  | $ | 6,598,419 |  | $ | 17,151,752
Thomas M. Scalera |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Cash Severance(1) |  | $ | — |  | $ | — |  | $ | 630,000 |  | $ | 1,620,000
AIP |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 1,215,000
Unvested Equity Awards(2) |  |  | — |  |  | 6,055,158 |  |  | 4,077,829 |  |  | 7,317,400
ITT Supplemental Retirement Savings Plan(3) |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 113,400
Other Benefits(4) |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 40,015 |  |  | 40,015
TOTAL(5) |  | $ | — |  | $ | 6,055,158 |  | $ | 4,747,844 |  | $ | 10,305,815
Mary Beth Gustafsson |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Cash Severance(1) |  | $ | — |  | $ | — |  | $ | 482,000 |  | $ | 1,446,000
AIP |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 1,084,500
Unvested Equity Awards(2) |  |  | — |  |  | 3,652,032 |  |  | 2,569,158 |  |  | 4,322,773
ITT Supplemental Retirement Savings Plan(3) |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 101,220
Other Benefits(4) |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 40,300 |  |  | 40,300
TOTAL(5) |  | $ | — |  | $ | 3,652,032 |  | $ | 3,091,458 |  | $ | 6,994,793
Farrokh Batliwala |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Cash Severance(1) |  | $ | — |  | $ | — |  | $ | 369,360 |  | $ | 1,200,000
AIP |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 900,000
Unvested Equity Awards(2) |  |  | — |  |  | 2,270,381 |  |  | 1,337,874 |  |  | 2,697,378
ITT Supplemental Retirement Savings Plan(3) |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 72,025
Other Benefits(4) |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 32,987 |  |  | 32,987
TOTAL(5) |  | $ | — |  | $ | 2,270,381 |  | $ | 1,740,221 |  | $ | 4,902,390
Carlo Ghirardo |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Cash Severance(1) |  | $ | — |  | $ | — |  | $ | 414,000 |  | $ | 1,242,000
AIP |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 807,300
Unvested Equity Awards(2) |  |  | — |  |  | 1,495,569 |  |  | 744,099 |  |  | 1,857,836
ITT Supplemental Retirement Savings Plan(3) |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | —
Other Benefits(4) |  |  | 76,974 |  |  | 468,974 |  |  | 106,974 |  |  | 106,974
TOTAL(5) |  | $ | 76,974 |  | $ | 1,964,543 |  | $ | 1,265,073 |  | $ | 4,014,110

| (1) | Under the ITT Senior Executive Severance Pay Plan, and taking into account Mr. Scalera’s 2011 employment letter entered into at the time of the Spin Transaction, and as described elsewhere in this section, the following executives would receive base salary after termination without cause for the following severance periods: Mr. Savi 12 months, Mr.Scalera 14 months, Ms. Gustafsson 12 months, and Mr. Batliwala 48 weeks. Although also eligible under the ITT Senior Executive Severance Pay Plan (42 weeks), Mr. Ghirardo would receive the higher severance benefits afforded by his status as a Dirigenti (executive level employee) under the Italy national labor contract, which is equal to 12 months of pay based on his average annual compensation over the past three years. In the event of termination following a change of control, all NEOs are covered under the Company’s ITT Senior Executive Change in Control Severance Pay Plan described elsewhere in this section and, under the terms of the plan, would be paid a lump sum payment equal to the sum of (x) three (3) times the current annual base salary rate paid at the time of termination of employment, and (y) three (3) times the annual bonus awarded (whether or not deferred). Mr. Ghirardo’s potential payouts have been converted from euros to U.S. dollars using the 2019 average exchange rate of 1.12.

ITT INC.❘ 2020 PROXY STATEMENT 65

Back to Contents

| (2) | Unvested equity awards reflect the market value of stock and in the money value of stock options based on the Company’s December 31, 2019 closing stock price of $73.91. The value of PSUs under Terminate Not for Cause or With Good Reason After Change of Control is calculated using a payout of 160.4%, which is the greater of target payout and last year’s (2017) PSU payout. Termination provisions are set forth in the specific award agreements.

| (3) | No additional ITT Supplemental Retirement Savings Plan payments are made in the event of voluntary or involuntary termination, or termination for cause. Amount reflects the additional cash payment representing Company contributions, which would be made following a change of control as described in the ITT Senior Executive Change in Control Severance Pay Plan.

| (4) | Under the ITT Senior Executive Severance Pay Plan and the ITT Senior Executive Change in Control Severance Pay Plan, eligible executives will continue to receive subsidized healthcare benefits during the severance period for the first six months after termination without cause. Senior executives are eligible for up to one year of outplacement services with an estimated value of $30,000. Mr. Savi and Mr. Ghirardo would be eligible to receive payment under the Italian statutory termination indemnity plan (Previndai) upon separation for any reason in the amounts of $635,713 and $76,974, respectively. As a Dirigenti employee (executive), Mr. Ghirardo’s estate is eligible for a payment of $392,000 in the event of his death. The amounts for Mr. Savi and Mr. Ghirardo have been converted from euros to U.S. dollars using the 2019 average exchange rate of 1.12

| (5) | Values in this table show the full payments per the applicable plan documents under the potential termination scenarios. In the event of a change of control a “best net” provision would apply, which provides either an unreduced benefit or a reduction in payments sufficient to avoid triggering an excise tax, whichever is better after-tax.

CEO PAY RATIO

We are required to calculate and report a reasonable estimate of the ratio of the annual total compensation of our CEO to the median annual total compensation of our other employees. For 2019, we calculated the CEO Pay Ratio to be 131.

The median employee used to calculate the 2018 CEO pay ratio left the Company during 2019, so we conducted the following process to identify the median employee for 2019. The date used to determine the median employee was December 31, 2019. We used annual salary rate as the consistently applied measure to determine the median employee. To account for employees paid in currencies other than the U.S. dollar, we used currency exchange rates as of December 31, 2019 to convert their compensation into U.S. dollars. We excluded employees from acquisitions that closed in 2019. We started with 10,558 full time, part-time and temporary employees who were paid directly by ITT or our subsidiaries, and also included contractors for whom ITT or our subsidiaries determine compensation, but were employed by third parties as of December 31, 2019.

We then excluded all 471 of our employees in Argentina and Poland under an applicable exemption for limited numbers of non-U.S. employees. The excluded employees in Argentina and Poland represented less than 5% of our total employee population. No cost of living adjustments were utilized in identifying our median employee or calculating the annual total compensation.

We identified the median employee to be a full-time hourly employee located in the U.S. We then determined the annual total compensation of the median employee, which included actual annual salary, overtime and company contributions toward benefits (medical and dental premiums and contributions to the employee’s 401(k) account). The total annual compensation of our median employee was determined to be $53,778. For 2019, the annual compensation for Mr. Savi was $7,068,573, which is shown in the Summary Compensation Table.

ITT INC.❘ 2020 PROXY STATEMENT 66

Back to Contents

CO MPENSATION AND PERSONNEL COMMITTEE REPORT

ITT’s Compensation and Personnel Committee is responsible for the overall design and governance of the Company’s executive compensation program, senior leadership development and talent management programs. The Compensation and Personnel Committee’s primary objective is to establish a competitive executive compensation program that clearly links executive compensation to business performance and shareholder return. The Compensation and Personnel Committee considers and monitors appropriate risk factors in structuring compensation to discourage unnecessary or excessive risk-taking behaviors and encourage long-term value creation.

RECOMMENDATION REGARDING COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

In performing its governance function, with regard to the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the Compensation and Personnel Committee relied on statements and information prepared by the Company’s management. It also relied on information provided by Pay Governance. The Compensation and Personnel Committee reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis included in this Proxy Statement with management. Based on this review and discussion, the Compensation and Personnel Committee recommended to the Company’s Board of Directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in the Company’s 2019 Annual Report on Form 10-K and this Proxy Statement.

This report is furnished by the members of the Compensation and Personnel Committee.

■ Orlando D. Ashford | ■ Christina A. Gold (will not stand for re-election in 2020) | ■ Richard P. Lavin (Chair)
■ Mario Longhi | ■ Rebecca A. McDonald |

20 19 NON-MANAGEMENT DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

The table below represents the 2019 compensation for our non-management directors. As discussed in more detail in the narrative following the table, all non-management directors receive the same cash fees and stock awards for their service, which consists of a $100,000 annual cash retainer and an annual RSU award with a value of $125,000, except for the following: Mr. MacInnis, as Non-Executive Chairman, received an additional $62,500 cash payment and an additional RSU award with a value of $62,500; Mr. Powers as Audit Committee Chair, received an additional $15,000 cash payment; Mr. Lavin as Compensation and Personnel Committee Chair, received an additional $10,000 cash payment; and Mr. DeFosset as the Nominating and Governance Committee Chair received an additional $10,000 cash payment. As a management director, Mr. Savi does not receive compensation for Board service.

Compensation is paid to non-management directors in a lump sum following the annual meeting at which they are elected. Non-management directors who join the Board of Directors during the course of a year receive their compensation promptly following their election, in amounts that are pro-rated to reflect their partial year of service on the Board. For periods prior to 2020, our non-management directors were eligible to participate in the ITT Deferred Compensation Plan. Because of changes to the Plan described on page 50, for periods after 2020, non-management directors may only choose to defer receipt of their equity retainer. The grant date fair value of stock awards granted to non-management directors in 2019 is provided in footnote (2) to the table below. Stock awards are composed of RSUs.

ITT INC.❘ 2020 PROXY STATEMENT 67

Back to Contents

Name |  | Fees Earned or Paid in Cash(1) |  | Stock Awards(2) |  | Total
Orlando D. Ashford |  | $ | 100,000 |  | $ | 125,012 |  | $ | 225,012
Geraud Darnis |  |  | 100,000 |  |  | 125,012 |  |  | 225,012
Donald DeFosset, Jr. |  |  | 110,000 |  |  | 125,012 |  |  | 235,012
Nicholas C. Fanandakis |  |  | 100,000 |  |  | 125,012 |  |  | 225,012
Christina A. Gold |  |  | 100,000 |  |  | 125,012 |  |  | 225,012
Richard P. Lavin |  |  | 110,000 |  |  | 125,012 |  |  | 235,012
Mario Longhi |  |  | 100,000 |  |  | 125,012 |  |  | 225,012
Frank T. MacInnis |  |  | 162,500 |  |  | 162,528 |  |  | 325,028
Rebecca A. McDonald |  |  | 100,000 |  |  | 125,012 |  |  | 225,012
Timothy H. Powers |  |  | 115,000 |  |  | 125,012 |  |  | 240,012
Cheryl L. Shavers |  |  | 100,000 |  |  | 125,012 |  |  | 225,012
Sabrina Soussan |  |  | 100,000 |  |  | 125,012 |  |  | 225,012

| (1) | Fees may be paid in cash at the time they are earned, or deferred, at the election of the director. Non-management directors may irrevocably elect deferral into an interest-bearing cash account or into the ITT Stock Fund, which is a tracking fund that invests in Company stock. For periods after 2020, directors are no longer allowed to defer their cash retainers.

| (2) | Awards are made in RSUs and they reflect a grant date fair value computed in accordance with GAAP. The grant date fair value of the RSUs granted on May 22, 2019 was based on the ITT stock closing price of $59.36. The stock award component of the non-management director compensation program was increased from $100,000 to $125,000 in May 2019 after a review by Pay Governance of market comparison data. Non-management directors may elect to defer the receipt of their RSUs until a later date or when they leave the Board.

NON-MANAGEMENT DIRECTOR STOCK AWARDS AND OPTION AWARDS OUTSTANDING AT DECEMBER 31, 2019 FISCAL YEAR-END

Non-Management Director Name | Stock Awards | Option Awards
Orlando D. Ashford | 2,106 | —
Geraud Darnis | 3,966 | —
Donald DeFosset, Jr. | 9,225 | —
Nicholas C. Fanandakis | 3,966 | —
Christina A. Gold | 20,243 | —
Richard P. Lavin | 3,966 | —
Mario Longhi | 3,966 | —
Frank T. MacInnis | 22,385 | —
Rebecca A. McDonald | 8,536 | —
Timothy H. Powers | 11,396 | —
Cheryl L. Shavers | 2,106 | —
Sabrina Soussan | 2,106 | —

Outstanding stock awards include unvested RSUs granted under the 2011 Omnibus Incentive Plan and vested but deferred restricted shares and RSUs granted under the 2011 Omnibus Incentive Plan, the ITT 1996 Restricted Stock Plan for Non- Employee Directors and the Amended and Restated 2003 Equity Incentive Plan. RSUs granted to non-management directors vest one business day prior to the next annual meeting. Unvested RSUs do not earn dividends or carry voting rights while unvested, however dividend equivalents are accrued during this period and are paid out in cash following vesting of the award.

ITT reimburses directors for expenses they incur to travel to and from Board, Committee and shareholder meetings and for other Company business-related expenses (including travel expenses of spouses if they are specifically invited to attend an event for appropriate business purposes).

ITT INC.❘ 2020 PROXY STATEMENT 68

Back to Contents

NON-MANAGEMENT DIRECTOR STOCK OWNERSHIP GUIDELINES

ITT’s stock ownership guidelines currently provide for non-management directors to achieve stock ownership levels of five times the annual base cash retainer amount within five years of joining the Board. Non-management directors receive a portion of their retainer in RSUs, which are paid in shares when the RSUs vest. Non-management directors are required to hold such shares until their total share ownership meets or exceeds the ownership guidelines. Both the guidelines, and compliance with the guidelines, are monitored periodically. All non-management directors with at least one full year of service on the Board of Directors own stock in the Company.

INDEMNIFICATION AND INSURANCE

As permitted by its By-laws, ITT indemnifies its directors to the fullest extent permitted by law and maintains insurance to protect the directors from liabilities, including certain instances where ITT could not otherwise indemnify them. All directors are covered under a non-contributory group accidental death and dismemberment policy that provides each of them with $1,000,000 of coverage. They may elect to purchase additional coverage under that policy. Non-management directors also may elect to participate in an optional non-contributory group life insurance plan that provides $100,000 of coverage.

HEDGING POLICY

Our directors are subject to the Company’s policy prohibiting hedging and speculative trading in and out of the Company’s securities, including short sales and leverage transactions, such as puts, calls, and listed and unlisted options, as described on page 22.

ITT INC.❘ 2020 PROXY STATEMENT 69

Back to Contents

CON SIDERATION OF A SHAREHOLDER PROPOSAL REGARDING PROXY ACCESS
(PROXY ITEM NO. 4)

The following shareholder proposal will be voted on at the Annual Meeting if properly presented by or on behalf of the shareholder proponent. Other than minor formatting changes, we are reprinting the proposal and supporting statement as they were submitted to us, and we have not endeavored to correct any erroneous statements or typographical errors contained therein. Share holdings of the shareholder proponent, and where applicable, of co-filers, will be supplied upon request to the Company’s Corporate Secretary. Our Board of Directors has recommended a vote against the proposal for the reasons set forth following the proposal.

Mr. John Chevedden, 2215 Nelson Ave., No. 205 Redondo Beach, Calif. 90278 has submitted the following shareholder proposal:

Proposal 4 - Improve Shareholder Proxy Access

Shareholders request that our board of directors take the steps necessary to enable as many shareholders as may be needed to aggregate their shares to equal 3% of our stock owned continuously for 3-years in order to enable shareholder proxy access.

Currently proxy access at ITT is limited to 20 shareholders who must together own $180 million of ITT stock continuously for 3-years at a time when many shares are held for less than one-year. “Continuously for 3-years” will exclude the vast majority of ITT stock.

Under this proposal it is likely that the number of shareholders who participate in the aggregation process would still be a modest number due to the administrative burden on shareholders to qualify as one of the aggregation participants. Plus it is easy for management to reject potential aggregating shareholders because the administrative burden on shareholders leads to a number of potential technical errors by shareholders that management can then nitpick and thus reject.

Shareholders should be able to select the ownership structure of a group that requests proxy access. Shareholders are in the best position to know whether it will be more practical to have a few big shareholders or a greater number of smaller shareholders and should not be saddled with inflexible rules.

The directors of many companies promote “one sizes does not fit all” in their proxies and this principle should apply here. Indeed the ITT directors should support this proposal to be consistent with their opposition to a rigid, “one-size-fits-all” policy in the 2019 ITT proxy.

Please vote yes:

Improve Shareholder Proxy Access - Proposal 4

Recommendation of the Board of Directors

The Board of Directors recommends a vote AGAINST this proposal for the following reasons:

The Board has carefully considered the proposal and has concluded that the proposal is not in the best interests of the Company and our shareholders. The Board believes that the amendment requested by this shareholder proposal is unnecessary for the following reasons:

| ■ | We have already implemented proxy access in a meaningful manner and on terms that are the same as those adopted by a significant majority of companies that have adopted proxy access bylaws.

| ■ | Our By-laws permit up to 20 shareholders to aggregate their positions for purposes of meeting the 3% minimum ownership requirement and count affiliated shareholders as only one shareholder for this purpose.

| ■ | We maintain strong corporate governance practices that, when coupled with our existing proxy access By-law, provide shareholders with a meaningful voice into the nomination and election of directors.

ITT INC.❘ 2020 PROXY STATEMENT 70

Back to Contents

| 1. | The Company adopted a meaningful proxy access By-law following shareholder outreach.

The Board amended the Company’s By-laws to implement proxy access procedures in February 2016. The current version of the By-laws are publicly available as Exhibit 3.2 to the Current Report on Form 8-K that we filed with the SEC on May 25, 2018.

Recognizing that proxy access was of interest to many of our shareholders, prior to adopting the Company’s proxy access framework in February 2016, the Company analyzed the issue, including reviewing it with our major shareholders and advisors. Ultimately, the Board adopted a proxy access By-law that seeks to balance the interest of shareholders in effectively including candidates for the Board in the Company’s proxy materials with the need to use resources efficiently and protect the interests of all shareholders. The Board believes that the proxy access By-law it adopted achieves that balance and reflects its fundamental commitment to robust corporate governance practices.

The Company’s proxy access By-law differs from the shareholder proposal only with respect to the limit on how many shareholders may aggregate their shares in order to reach the 3% ownership requirement.

| 2. | The Company’s proxy access By-law permitting up to 20 shareholders to aggregate their holdings is appropriate.

The Company’s proxy access By-law permits up to 20 shareholders to aggregate their holdings in order to meet the 3% minimum ownership threshold. The Board believes this is a reasonable and appropriate provision that is consistent with: (i) views expressed by the shareholders during the Company’s outreach efforts prior to the Board’s adoption of the Company’s proxy access By-law, (ii) the practice of more than 90% of the companies that have adopted a proxy access provision, including all five companies in the Company’s Representative Peer Group disclosed on page 42 of this Proxy Statement that have proxy access provisions, and (iii) provisions that have received wide support from major institutional shareholders.

As disclosed on page 81 of this Proxy Statement, the Company’s largest three shareholders currently beneficially own a significant percentage of the Company’s outstanding common stock on an aggregated basis and have maintained significant ownership percentages in recent years. Further, under the Company’s existing proxy access By-law, a group comprised of 20 shareholders with equal holdings would only need to own 0.15% of the Company’s shares, or approximately 131,550 shares, in order for the group to meet the 3% minimum ownership threshold. A review of the Company’s share records indicates that 85 unaffiliated shareholders held this level of ownership as of December 31, 2019, and cumulatively this group owned over 87% of the Company’s outstanding common stock.

If these shareholders held a consistent number of shares across the three-year holding period, these shareholders would have the ability to form innumerable combinations of 20-member (or smaller) groups for the purpose of meeting the 3% minimum ownership threshold. In addition, there are no restrictions that would prevent any of these known institutional investors from participating in shareholder groups initiated by or otherwise involving any of the holders of the remaining 13% of the Company’s shares, regardless of the number of shares held by any of those smaller holders. The Company accordingly believes that its existing By-law provides a meaningful proxy access right that does not inhibit the formation of shareholder groups to achieve the minimum ownership requirement.

Further, the Company believes that although shareholder groups with more than 20 members are unlikely to form, to the extent they do, or attempt to do so, such groups would generate substantial administrative and operational costs for the Company without providing a corresponding benefit to shareholders. The Company is required to make inquiries into the nature and duration of the share ownership of each shareholder participating in an aggregate group in order to verify their holdings and compliance with the requirements of our By-laws. The expansion of these obligations to groups comprised of more than 20 unaffiliated shareholders would be highly impractical from the Company’s perspective, and would potentially jeopardize the Company’s ability to administer nominations submitted by such groups in accordance with the By-laws. Finally, the Board does not believe that the current aggregation limit restricts the ability of institutional investors or other significant investors to make nominations because affiliated shareholders (i.e., those that are under common management and investment control) are counted as one shareholder for purposes of the aggregation requirement.

In this regard, aside from this shareholder proposal and a similar shareholder proposal submitted by the proponent for the 2017 annual meeting of shareholders, the Company has not received any communications from shareholders indicating that the 20 shareholder aggregation provision is unduly restrictive. The existing By-law therefore strikes an appropriate balance between the interests of shareholders in taking advantage of proxy access procedures with the need to efficiently use the Company’s resources in the interest of all shareholders.

| 3. | The Company has an established record of strong governance practices, particularly when it comes to Board accountability and shareholder engagement.

In considering the shareholder proposal, our Board encourages shareholders to consider the Company’s proxy access aggregation provision in the context of other provisions already included in our Company’s Articles of Incorporation, By-laws, Corporate Governance Principles and other practices that are designed to promote accountability of our Board and management to our investors and to foster shareholder engagement. These include the following highlights:

| ■ | Proxy access procedures reflecting input from our shareholders and containing terms that are consistent with those of other companies are available to shareholders under the existing By-laws;

| ■ | A process exists for shareholders to submit recommendations of director candidates for consideration by the Nominating and Governance Committee;

| ■ | As described elsewhere in this Proxy Statement, ITT has a strong shareholder engagement process;

| ■ | Shareholders have a right to call special meetings at a reasonable threshold;

ITT INC.❘ 2020 PROXY STATEMENT 71

Back to Contents

| ■ | We actively review and refresh our Board of Directors and have added six new independent directors since the beginning of 2015;

| ■ | The independent Nominating and Governance Committee annually evaluates the Board and, in making decisions on the Board’s composition, considers the tenure, performance, contributions, experience, skill set, and commitment of each director;

| ■ | Our Board is declassified and elected annually by a majority of the votes cast in uncontested elections;

| ■ | Our Board proactively engages with shareholders;

| ■ | All members of the Board, other than the Chief Executive Officer, are independent (92% independent);

| ■ | Our Board has a high degree of diversity;

| ■ | There are no supermajority voting requirements in our Company’s Articles of Incorporation or By-laws; and

| ■ | Directors are subject to meaningful stock ownership requirements.

CONCLUSION

The Board of Directors believes that, as described in detail above, the Company’s proxy access By-law, including the provision permitting up to 20 shareholders to aggregate their holdings, achieves the proper balance of providing shareholders with a meaningful proxy access right while managing administrative and operational costs in a practical manner. The Company remains committed to maintaining strong corporate governance practices, and the Board believes the Company’s existing proxy access By-law achieves this objective.

RECOMMENDATION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
| THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS A VOTE AGAINST THIS PROPOSAL. UNLESS A CONTRARY CHOICE IS SPECIFIED, PROXIES SOLICITED BY THE BOARD WILL BE VOTED AGAINST THIS PROPOSAL.

ITT INC.❘ 2020 PROXY STATEMENT 72

Back to Contents

OT HER MATTERS

INFORMATION ABOUT THE PROXY STATEMENT & VOTING

PROXY STATEMENT

This Proxy Statement is furnished to the shareholders of record of ITT Inc., an Indiana corporation, in connection with the solicitation of proxies on behalf of the Board of Directors of the Company, for use at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on May 15, 2020. The Annual Meeting will be held at 9:00 a.m. Eastern Time at ITT Inc. Headquarters, 1133 Westchester Avenue, White Plains, NY 10604.

WHY DID I RECEIVE THESE PROXY MATERIALS?

Beginning on or about March 31, 2020, this Proxy Statement is being mailed or made available, as the case may be, to shareholders who were shareholders as of March 18, 2020, the record date, as part of the Board of Directors’ solicitation of proxies for the Annual Meeting, including any adjournment or postponement thereof. This Proxy Statement and the ITT 2019 Annual Report to Shareholders (the “Annual Report”) and Annual Report on Form 10-K (which have been furnished to shareholders eligible to vote at the Annual Meeting) contain information that the Board of Directors believes is relevant to shareholders in voting on the matters to be addressed at the Annual Meeting.

WHO IS ENTITLED TO VOTE?

You can vote if you owned shares of the Company’s common stock as of the close of business on March 18, 2020, the record date.

HOW DO I GET ADMITTED TO THE ANNUAL MEETING?

Only shareholders of record or beneficial owners of the Company’s common stock as of the record date may attend the Annual Meeting in person. You will need an admission ticket or proof of ownership to enter the Annual Meeting. An admission ticket is attached to your proxy card if you hold shares directly in your name as a shareholder of record. If you received a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (a “Notice”), your Notice is your admission ticket. We encourage you to vote your proxy as soon as possible, even if you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, but please keep the admission ticket and bring it with you to the Annual Meeting.

If your shares are held beneficially in the name of a broker, bank or other holder of record, you must present proof of your ownership of common stock, such as a bank or brokerage account statement, to be admitted to the Annual Meeting. Please note that if you plan to attend the Annual Meeting in person and would like to vote there, you will need to bring a legal proxy from your broker, bank or other holder of record as explained below. If your shares are held beneficially and you would rather have an admission ticket, you can obtain one in advance by mailing a written request, along with proof of your ownership of common stock, to:

ITT Inc.
1133 Westchester Avenue
White Plains, NY 10604
Attn: Corporate Secretary

Shareholders also must present a form of photo identification, such as a driver’s license, in order to be admitted to the Annual Meeting. No cameras, recording equipment, large bags or packages will be permitted in the Annual Meeting.

ITT INC.❘ 2020 PROXY STATEMENT 73

Back to Contents

VOTING INFORMATION

HOW DO I VOTE?

Shareholders may vote using any of the following methods:

BY TELEPHONE OR ON THE INTERNET

You can vote by calling the toll-free telephone number on your proxy card or Notice. Please have your proxy card or Notice handy when you call. Easy-to-follow voice prompts allow you to vote your shares and confirm that your instructions have been properly recorded.

The website for Internet voting is www.proxyvote.com. Please have your proxy card or Notice handy when you go online. As with telephone voting, you can confirm that your instructions have been properly recorded. If you vote on the Internet, you also can request electronic delivery of future proxy materials.

Telephone and Internet voting facilities for shareholders of record will be available 24 hours a day and will close at 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on May 14, 2020. The availability of telephone and Internet voting for beneficial owners will depend on the voting processes of your broker, bank or other holder of record. Therefore, the Company recommends that you follow the voting instructions in the materials you receive.

If you vote by telephone or on the Internet, you do not need to return your proxy card.

BY MAIL

If you received your Annual Meeting materials by mail, you may complete, sign and date the proxy card or voting instruction card and return it in the prepaid envelope. If you are a shareholder of record and you return your signed proxy card but do not indicate your voting preferences, the persons named in the proxy card will vote the shares represented by that proxy as recommended by the Board of Directors.

IN PERSON AT THE ANNUAL MEETING

All shareholders may vote in person at the Annual Meeting. You may also be represented by another person at the Annual Meeting by executing a proper proxy designating that person. If you are a beneficial owner of shares, you must obtain a legal proxy from your broker, bank or other holder of record and present it to the inspectors of election with your ballot to be able to vote at the Annual Meeting. We encourage you to vote as soon as possible, even if you intend to attend the Annual Meeting in person.

* We intend to hold our 2020 Annual Meeting of Shareholders in person. However, we continue to monitor the situation regarding COVID-19 (coronavirus) closely, taking into account guidance from public health authorities. We are sensitive to the public health and travel concerns our shareholders may have and the protocols that federal, state, and local governments may impose. Accordingly, we may determine that it is advisable to change the date, time, location or manner of conducting the 2020 Annual Meeting of Shareholders. In the event that we change the date, time, location or manner of conducting the 2020 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, we will announce that fact as promptly as practicable with details on how to participate and vote at such meeting. Please monitor our website at www.itt.com/ investors for updated information. If you are planning to attend our meeting, please check the website one week prior to the meeting date. As always, we encourage you to vote your shares prior to the 2020 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.

BY GRANTING A PROXY OR SUBMITTING VOTING INSTRUCTIONS

You may vote by granting a proxy or, for shares held in street name, by submitting voting instructions to your bank, broker or other holder of record.

WHAT IS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN A REGISTERED OWNER AND A BENEFICIAL OWNER?

If your shares are registered in your name with ITT’s transfer agent, Computershare, you are a “registered owner,” also sometimes referred to as the “shareholder of record” of those shares.

If your shares are held in a stock brokerage account or by a bank or other holder of record, you are considered the “beneficial owner” of those shares, which are also sometimes referred to as being held in “street name,” and this Proxy Statement and any accompanying documents have been provided to you by your broker, bank or other holder of record. As the beneficial owner, you have the right to direct your broker, bank or other holder of record how to vote your shares by using the voting instruction card or by following their instructions for voting by telephone or on the Internet.

ITT INC.❘ 2020 PROXY STATEMENT 74

Back to Contents

HOW MANY VOTES DO I HAVE?

You have one vote for every share of common stock that you own as of the record date.

WHY DOES THE BOARD SOLICIT PROXIES FROM SHAREHOLDERS?

Since it is impractical for all shareholders to attend the Annual Meeting and vote in person, the Board of Directors recommends that you appoint the two people named on the accompanying proxy card to act as your proxies at the Annual Meeting.

WHAT ITEMS ARE ON THE AGENDA FOR THE ANNUAL MEETING?

There are four formal items scheduled to be voted upon at the Annual Meeting as described in the Notice of 2020 Annual Meeting of Shareholders. As of the date of this Proxy Statement, there are no other matters that the Board of Directors intends to present, or has reason to believe others will present, at the Annual Meeting. If you have returned your signed and completed proxy card and other matters are properly presented for voting at the Annual Meeting, the people named on the accompanying proxy card (or, if applicable, their substitutes), will have the discretion to vote on those matters for you.

HOW WILL MY SHARES BE VOTED AT THE ANNUAL MEETING?

At the Annual Meeting, the people named on the accompanying proxy card (or if applicable, their substitutes), will vote your shares as you instruct. If you sign your proxy card and return it without indicating how you would like to vote your shares, your shares will be voted as the Board of Directors recommends, which is set forth under “Proxy Statement Executive Summary” on page 7 of this Proxy Statement. With respect to any other business as may properly come before the Annual Meeting, your shares will be voted in accordance with the judgment of the persons voting the proxy.

WHAT IF I CHANGE MY MIND?

As a holder of record of common stock, you may revoke or change your proxy at any time before the Annual Meeting by filing a notice of revocation or another signed, later-dated proxy card with the Corporate Secretary of the Company, at the Company’s principal executive offices as listed on the first page of this Proxy Statement. You may also revoke your proxy by attending the Annual Meeting and voting in person. If you are a beneficial owner of common stock, you should follow the voting directions you will receive from your broker, bank or other holder of record along with the Company’s proxy solicitation materials. As previously noted, you will need a legal proxy from your broker, bank or other holder of record if you prefer to cast your vote in person at the Annual Meeting.

HOW MANY SHARES OF ITT STOCK ARE OUTSTANDING?

As of March 18, 2020, the record date, 88,024,417 shares of common stock were outstanding.

HOW MANY HOLDERS OF ITT OUTSTANDING SHARES MUST BE PRESENT TO HOLD THE ANNUAL MEETING?

In order to conduct business at the Annual Meeting, it is necessary to have a quorum. To have a quorum, shareholders entitled to cast a majority of votes at the Annual Meeting must be present in person or by proxy. The inspectors of election appointed for the Annual Meeting will separately tabulate all affirmative and negative votes, abstentions and “broker non-votes.” Abstentions and broker non-votes are counted as present for purposes of determining the presence or absence of a quorum for the transaction of business.

WHAT IS A “BROKER NON-VOTE”?

If you are a beneficial owner whose shares are held of record by a broker, you must instruct the broker how to vote your shares with respect to certain items of business. If you do not provide voting instructions, your shares will not be voted on any item of business on which the broker does not have discretionary authority to vote. This is called a broker non-vote. In these cases, the broker will not be able to vote on those matters for which specific authorization is required under the rules of the NYSE.

ITT INC.❘ 2020 PROXY STATEMENT 75

Back to Contents

If you are a beneficial owner whose shares are held of record by a broker, your broker has discretionary voting authority under NYSE rules to vote your shares on the ratification of Deloitte as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, even if the broker does not receive voting instructions from you. However, your broker does not have discretionary authority to vote without instructions from you on the election of directors, the advisory vote on the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers, or the shareholder proposal, and in each case a broker non-vote will occur and your shares will not be voted on these items of business.

If you hold shares of common stock through a broker, bank or other holder of record, follow the voting instructions you receive from that organization.

HOW MANY VOTES ARE REQUIRED TO ELECT DIRECTORS? HOW MANY VOTES ARE REQUIRED FOR OTHER AGENDA ITEMS TO PASS?

ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

The Company’s By-laws provide that in uncontested elections, a director nominee shall be elected by a majority of the votes cast by the shareholders represented in person or by proxy at the Annual Meeting. A “majority of the votes cast” means that the number of votes cast “for” a director nominee must exceed the number of votes cast “against” that nominee (with abstentions and broker non-votes not counted as votes cast with respect to that director nominee). The By-laws further provide that in uncontested elections, any director nominee who fails to be elected by a majority, but who also is a director at the time, shall promptly provide a written conditional resignation, as a holdover director, to the Chair of the Board or the Corporate Secretary, and remain a director until a successor is elected and qualified. The Nominating and Governance Committee shall promptly consider the resignation and all relevant facts and circumstances concerning any vote and the best interests of the Company and its shareholders. After consideration, the Nominating and Governance Committee shall make a recommendation to the Board whether to accept or reject the tendered resignation, or whether other action should be taken. The Board will act on the Nominating and Governance Committee’s recommendation no later than its next regularly scheduled Board meeting (after certification of the shareholder vote) or within 90 days after certification of the shareholder vote, whichever is earlier, and the Board will promptly publicly disclose its decision and the reasons for its decision. As discussed above, brokers (and many banks and other record holders of “street name” shares that follow the applicable NYSE voting rules for member brokers) do not have discretionary voting power with respect to director elections unless they have customer voting instructions. This means that, without your voting instructions on this matter, a broker non-vote will occur because your broker (or bank or other holder of record) does not have the power to vote your shares on the election of directors. As a result, it is very important that you return voting instructions relating to the election of directors to your broker, bank or other holder of record.

ALL OTHER MATTERS

The proposals relating to the selection of the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers and the shareholder proposal are each advisory in nature and non-binding.

For each of these proposals, the votes cast in favor of the proposal must exceed the votes cast against the proposal. If you abstain from voting or if there is a broker non-vote on any matter, your abstention or broker non-vote will not affect the outcome of such vote, because abstentions and broker non-votes are not considered to be votes cast.

HOW DO I VOTE IF I AM A PARTICIPANT IN THE ITT RETIREMENT SAVINGS PLAN?

If you participate in the ITT Retirement Savings Plan (formerly the ITT Corporation Retirement Savings Plan), your plan trustee will vote the ITT shares credited to your ITT Retirement Savings Plan account in accordance with your voting instructions, except as otherwise provided in accordance with the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”). The trustee will vote the shares on your behalf because you are the beneficial owner, not the shareholder of record, of the shares held by the ITT Retirement Savings Plan. The trustee votes the shares held in your ITT Retirement Savings Plan account for which no voting instructions are received (“Undirected Shares”) in the same proportion as the shares for which the trustee receives voting instructions, except as otherwise provided in accordance with ERISA. Under the ITT Retirement Savings Plan, participants are “named fiduciaries” to the extent of their authority to direct the voting of ITT shares credited to their savings plan accounts and their proportionate share of Undirected Shares. By submitting voting instructions by telephone, the Internet or by signing and returning the voting instruction card, you direct the trustee of the ITT Retirement Savings Plan to vote these shares, in person or by proxy at the Annual Meeting.

ITT Retirement Savings Plan participants should mail their confidential voting instruction card to Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. (“Broadridge”), acting as tabulation agent, or vote by telephone or Internet. Instructions from ITT Retirement Savings Plan Participants must be received by Broadridge no later than 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on May 14, 2020.

ITT INC.❘ 2020 PROXY STATEMENT 76

Back to Contents

HOW MANY SHARES ARE HELD BY PARTICIPANTS IN THE ITT RETIREMENT SAVINGS PLAN?

As of March 18, 2020, the record date, the ITT Retirement Savings Plan held 158,399 shares of common stock (approximately 0.17% of the outstanding shares). Northern Trust is trustee of the ITT Retirement Savings Plan.

WHO COUNTS THE VOTES? IS MY VOTE CONFIDENTIAL?

In accordance with the By-laws, the Company will appoint two Inspectors of Election, who may be officers or employees of the Company, and they will tabulate the votes. The Inspectors of Election monitor the voting and also certify whether the votes of shareholders are kept in confidence in compliance with ITT’s confidential voting policy.

WHO WILL PAY FOR THE COST OF THIS PROXY SOLICITATION?

ITT will pay the cost of soliciting proxies. Proxies may be solicited on our behalf by our directors, officers or employees in person or by telephone, mail, electronic transmission and/or facsimile transmission. Innisfree M&A Incorporated, 501 Madison Avenue, New York, NY 10022, has been retained to assist in soliciting proxies for a fee of $12,500, plus distribution costs and other costs and expenses.

WHAT IS “HOUSEHOLDING” AND HOW DOES IT AFFECT ME?

The Company has adopted a procedure approved by the SEC called “householding.” Under this procedure, beneficial shareholders who have the same address and last name and who do not participate in electronic delivery or Internet access of proxy materials will receive only one copy of the Company’s Annual Report and Proxy Statement unless one or more of these shareholders notifies the Company that they wish to continue receiving individual copies. This procedure is designed to reduce duplicate mailings and save significant printing and processing costs, as well as natural resources.

Each shareholder who participates in householding will continue to receive a separate proxy card or Notice. Your consent to householding is perpetual unless you revoke it. You may revoke your consent at any time by contacting Broadridge, either by calling toll-free at (800) 542-1061, or by writing to Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. Householding Department, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717. You will be removed from the householding program within 30 days of receipt of your response, after which you will receive an individual copy of the proxy materials.

WHY DID I RECEIVE A “NOTICE OF INTERNET AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS” BUT NO PROXY MATERIALS?

We distribute our proxy materials to certain shareholders by giving notice to those shareholders that they may access their proxy materials on the Internet. This so-called “Notice and Access” approach, which is permitted by SEC rules, conserves natural resources and reduces our costs of printing and distributing the proxy materials, while providing a convenient method of accessing the materials and voting to shareholders. On March 31, 2020, we mailed a “Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials” to participating shareholders, containing instructions on how to access the proxy materials on the Internet.

HOW DO I RECEIVE PROXY MATERIALS ELECTRONICALLY IN THE FUTURE?

This Proxy Statement and the Annual Report are available online at www.proxyvote.com. Instead of receiving future proxy statements and accompanying materials by mail, most shareholders can elect to receive an e-mail that will provide electronic links to them. Opting to receive your proxy materials online will conserve natural resources and will save us the cost of producing documents and mailing them to you, and will also give you an electronic link to the proxy voting site.

ITT INC.❘ 2020 PROXY STATEMENT 77

Back to Contents

SHAREHOLDERS OF RECORD

You may sign up for the service by logging onto the Internet at www.proxyvote.com. Please have your proxy card handy when you go online.

BENEFICIAL OWNERS

You also may be able to receive copies of these documents electronically. Check the information provided in the proxy materials sent to you by your broker, bank or other holder of record regarding the availability of this service or contact them regarding electronic delivery of materials.

HOW DOES A SHAREHOLDER PROPOSE MATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION AT THE 2021 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS?

PROPOSALS TO BE INCLUDED IN OUR PROXY STATEMENT

Under SEC rules, if a shareholder wants us to include a proposal in our proxy statement for presentation at our 2021 annual meeting of shareholders, the proposal must be received by us by December 1, 2020. Any such proposal must comply with Rule 14a-8 under the Exchange Act.

PROPOSALS TO BE BROUGHT BEFORE THE 2021 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

A shareholder seeking to introduce an item of business at the 2021 annual meeting of shareholders must comply with the procedures set forth in our By-laws. If you intend to propose an item of business to be presented at our 2021 annual meeting of shareholders, you must notify us of your intention, in writing, on or after December 1, 2020, but not later than December 31, 2020. In the event that the date of the 2021 annual meeting of shareholders is changed by more than 30 days from the anniversary date of the Annual Meeting, such notice must be received not earlier than 120 calendar days prior to the 2021 annual meeting and not later than 90 calendar days prior to the 2021 annual meeting, or, if later, 10 calendar days following the date on which public announcement of the date of the 2021 annual meeting is first made.

For any special meeting of shareholders, the item of business must be received no earlier than 120 calendar days nor later than 90 calendar days prior to the date of the special meeting, or, if later, 10 calendar days following the date on which the public announcement of the date of the special meeting is first made.

HOW DOES A SHAREHOLDER NOMINATE DIRECTORS FOR THE 2021 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS?

DIRECTOR NOMINATIONS FOR INCLUSION IN OUR PROXY STATEMENT

In February 2016, we amended our By-laws to implement “proxy access,” which allows a shareholder or group of shareholders meeting certain conditions to nominate directors for election at annual meetings of shareholders using our proxy statement. This provision allows a shareholder, or group of up to 20 shareholders, to nominate up to two director candidates or, if greater, up to 20% of the number of directors then serving on our Board of Directors, if the shareholder or group has owned continuously for at least three years a number of shares equal to at least three percent of our outstanding common stock measured as of the date we receive the nomination. The number of director candidates who may be nominated under our proxy access By-law will be reduced by the number of director nominations made under our advance notice By-law, as described in the following section.

If you intend to nominate a director for election at the 2021 annual meeting of shareholders using our proxy access By-law, you must submit the nomination, along with the other materials required by our By-laws, on or after November 1, 2020, but not later than December 1, 2020.

DIRECTOR NOMINATIONS TO BE BROUGHT BEFORE THE 2021 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

If you intend to nominate a director for consideration at the 2021 annual meeting of shareholders, you must notify us in writing of your intention to do so and provide us with the information required by our advance notice By-law on or after December 1, 2020, but not later than December 31, 2020. In the event that the date of the 2021 annual meeting of shareholders is changed by more than 30 days from the anniversary date of the Annual Meeting, such notice must be received not earlier than 120 calendar days prior to the 2021 annual meeting and not later than 90 calendar days prior to the 2021 annual meeting, or, if later, 10 calendar days following the date on which public announcement of the date of the 2021 annual meeting is first made.

For any special meeting of shareholders, a nomination to be brought before the meeting must be received no earlier than 120 calendar days nor later than 90 calendar days prior to the date of the special meeting, or, if later, 10 calendar days following the date on which the public announcement of the date of the special meeting is first made.

Note that any such nominations will not be included in or voted through the Company’s proxy materials.

ITT INC.❘ 2020 PROXY STATEMENT 78

Back to Contents

WHAT INFORMATION MUST I SUBMIT WITH A PROPOSAL OR NOMINATION?

A shareholder’s submission of a proposal or director nomination must include information specified in our By-laws concerning the proposal or nomination, as the case may be, and information as to the shareholder’s ownership of common stock. Any person considering submission of a proposal for an item of business or a nomination to be considered at a shareholder meeting should carefully review our By-laws. We will not entertain any proposals or nominations at the 2021 annual meeting of shareholders that do not meet these requirements. The By-laws are available upon request, free of charge, from ITT Inc., 1133 Westchester Avenue, White Plains, NY 10604, Attention: Corporate Secretary. The By-laws were also filed as Exhibit 3.2 to the Current Report on Form 8-K that we filed with the SEC on May 25, 2018, which is available, free of charge, on the SEC’s website, www.sec.gov, and our Investor Relations website, www.itt.com/investors/corporate-governance.

Nominations of directors and notices relating thereto must meet all other qualifications and requirements of the Company’s Corporate Governance Principles, the committee charters and Regulation 14A under the Exchange Act. Any shareholder nominees will be evaluated by the Nominating and Governance Committee of the Board using the same standards as it uses for all other director nominees. These standards are discussed in further detail elsewhere in this Proxy Statement under the heading of “Corporate Governance and Related Matters— Directors’ Qualification and Selection Process.”

WHERE SHOULD I SEND A SHAREHOLDER PROPOSAL OR DIRECTOR NOMINATION FOR THE 2021 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS?

If you intend to submit a proposal or director nomination, you must send the proposal or nomination, along with all information required by our By-laws, to our principal executive offices at: ITT Inc., 1133 Westchester Avenue, White Plains, NY 10604, Attention: Corporate Secretary. We strongly encourage any shareholder interested in submitting a proposal or director nomination to contact our Corporate Secretary in advance of the above deadlines to discuss the proposal, and shareholders may want to consult knowledgeable counsel with regard to the detailed requirements of applicable securities laws and the Company’s By-laws. Submitting a shareholder proposal or nomination does not guarantee that we will include it in our Proxy Statement. The chairman of the Annual Meeting may refuse to allow the transaction of any business, or to acknowledge the nomination of any person, not made in compliance with the foregoing procedures.

WHO CAN HELP ANSWER MY ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS?

If you have any additional questions about the Annual Meeting or how to vote, please call our proxy solicitor, Innisfree M&A Incorporated, toll-free at 888-750-5834. Banks and brokers may call collect at 212-750-5833.

ITT INC.❘ 2020 PROXY STATEMENT 79

Back to Contents

STOCK OWNERSHIP OF DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CERTAIN SHAREHOLDERS

The following table shows the beneficial ownership of our common stock, as of January 31, 2020, by each director, by each of the NEOs, and by all directors and executive officers as a group.

The number of shares beneficially owned by each non-management director or executive officer has been determined under the rules of the SEC, which provide that beneficial ownership includes any shares as to which a person has sole or shared voting or dispositive power, and any shares which the person would have the right to acquire beneficial ownership of within 60 days through the exercise of any stock option or other right. Unless otherwise indicated, each non-management director or executive officer has sole dispositive and voting power, or shares those powers with his or her spouse. No directors or executive officers have pledged any shares of common stock.

|  | Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership |  |
Name of Beneficial Owner |  | Total Shares Beneficially Owned |  | Shares Owned Directly(1) |  | Options(2) |  | Stock Units(3) |  | Percent of Class
Luca Savi |  | 87,165 |  |  | — |  |  | 53,585 |  |  | 33,580 |  |  | * |
Thomas M. Scalera |  | 46,715 |  |  | 17,129 |  |  | — |  |  | 29,586 |  |  | * |
Mary Beth Gustafsson |  | 84,642 |  |  | 16,080 |  |  | 46,175 |  |  | 22,387 |  |  | * |
Farrokh Batliwala |  | 19,574 |  |  | 5,981 |  |  | — |  |  | 13,593 |  |  | * |
Carlo Ghirardo |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | * |
Orlando D. Ashford |  | 18,382 |  |  | 18,382 |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | * |
Geraud Darnis |  | 18,948 |  |  | 17,088 |  |  | — |  |  | 1,860 |  |  | * |
Donald DeFosset, Jr. |  | 21,460 |  |  | 14,341 |  |  | — |  |  | 7,119 |  |  | * |
Nicholas C. Fanandakis |  | 6,303 |  |  | 4,443 |  |  | — |  |  | 1,860 |  |  | * |
Christina A. Gold |  | 43,342 |  |  | 25,205 |  |  | — |  |  | 18,137 |  |  | * |
Richard P. Lavin |  | 14,567 |  |  | 12,707 |  |  | — |  |  | 1,860 |  |  | * |
Mario Longhi |  | 3,338 |  |  | 1,478 |  |  | — |  |  | 1,860 |  |  | * |
Frank T. MacInnis |  | 50,760 |  |  | 31,113 |  |  | — |  |  | 19,647 |  |  | * |
Rebecca A. McDonald |  | 12,503 |  |  | 6,073 |  |  | — |  |  | 6,430 |  |  | * |
Timothy H. Powers |  | 9,865 |  |  | 575 |  |  | — |  |  | 9,290 |  |  | * |
Cheryl L. Shavers |  | 1,200 |  |  | 1,280 |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | * |
Sabrina Soussan |  | 771 |  |  | 771 |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | * |
All Directors and Executive Officers as a Group (21 persons) |  | 469,394 |  |  | 184,485 |  |  | 101,950 |  |  | 182,958 |  |  | 0.5% |

| * | Less than 1%

| (1) | Includes units held as of January 31, 2020 representing interests in the ITT Stock Fund held within the ITT Retirement Savings Plan.

| (2) | All options shown in this table are vested. The Company no longer grants options, and there are no unvested option grants outstanding.

| (3) | Reflects PSUs and RSUs that vest or that may be settled within 60 days of January 31, 2020. The amounts for Mr. Savi, Mr. Scalera, Ms. Gustafsson, and Mr. Batliwala include RSUs and PSUs that vested, and were settled in stock during February and March 2020. Non-management directors’ total shares beneficially owned include RSUs that have vested but for which settlement is deferred until a later date.

The principal occupation and certain other information about the nominees is set forth in “Election of Directors (Proxy Item No. 1).”

ITT INC.❘ 2020 PROXY STATEMENT 80

Back to Contents

The following table gives information about each person or group of persons whom the Company knows to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of the outstanding shares of common stock based on information filed by that entity with the SEC on the dates indicated below.

Name and address of beneficial owner | Number of Shares Beneficially Owned | Percent of Class(4)
The Vanguard Group(1) 100 Vanguard Blvd Malvern, PA 19355 | 8,795,421 | 10.02%
BlackRock, Inc.(2) 55 East 52nd Street New York, NY 10022 | 7,949,121 | 9.05%
FMR LLC(3) 245 Summer Street Boston, MA 02210 | 6,078,067 | 6.92%

| (1) | As reported on Schedule 13G filed on February 10, 2020, The Vanguard Group has sole voting power with respect to 44,677 shares, shared voting power with respect to 12,453 shares, sole dispositive power with respect to 8,749,525 shares, and shared dispositive power with respect to 45,896 shares.

| (2) | As reported on Schedule 13G filed on February 5, 2020, BlackRock, Inc. has sole voting power with respect to 7,573,077 shares, sole dispositive power with respect to 7,949,121 shares, and no shared voting or dispositive power with respect to any shares.

| (3) | As reported on Schedule 13G filed on February 6, 2020, FMR LLC has sole voting power with respect to 870,893 shares, sole dispositive power with respect to 6,078,067 shares, and no shared voting or dispositive power with respect to any shares.

| (4) | Calculations based on the Company’s shares issued and outstanding of 87,806,208 as of January 31, 2020.

EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION

The following sets forth information concerning the shares of common stock that may be issued under equity compensation plans as of December 31, 2019.

| Number of Securities to be Issued Upon Exercise of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights | Weighted-Average Exercise Price of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights | Number of Securities Remaining Available for Future Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans
Equity Compensation Plans: |  |  |  |
Approved by Security Holders(1) | 1,194,127 | (2) | $ | 33.55 | (3) | 37,520,264 | (4)
Not Approved by Security Holders | — |  |  | — |  | — |
Total | 1,194,127 |  | $ | 33.55 |  | 37,520,264 |

| (1) | Equity compensation plans approved by shareholders include the 2003 Equity Incentive Plan and the 2011 Omnibus Incentive Plan. Since the approval of the 2011 Omnibus Incentive Plan, no additional awards will be granted under the ITT Amended and Restated 2003 Equity Incentive Plan.

| (2) | This amount includes 287,147 shares of common stock that are issuable upon the exercise of outstanding stock options, 509,159 shares of common stock that are deliverable under outstanding RSU awards and 397,821 shares of common stock that may be issued under outstanding PSU awards, which reflects the 2017 PSU awards at their actual 160% payout and the 2018 and 2019 PSU awards at the target (100%) number of shares that may be issuable under such awards. The weighted-average remaining contractual life of the total number of outstanding stock options was 4.3 years as disclosed in Note 17 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in the Company’s 2019 Annual Report on Form 10-K. The number of shares, if any, to be issued pursuant to outstanding PSU awards can range from zero to 200% of the units initially awarded based on our achievement, over a three-year period, of the stated performance goals described in this Proxy Statement.

| (3) | The weighted-average exercise price pertains only to outstanding stock options and not to outstanding restricted stock units or performance stock units, which by their nature have no exercise price.

| (4) | This amount represents the number of shares available for issuance pursuant to equity awards that may be granted in the future under the 2011 Omnibus Incentive Plan.

ITT INC.❘ 2020 PROXY STATEMENT 81

Back to Contents

FORM 10-K

The Company filed its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the 2019 fiscal year with the SEC on February 21, 2020. A copy of the Company’s Form 10-K (without exhibits or documents incorporated by reference) is included in the 2019 Annual Report to Shareholders that is being delivered or made available via the Internet concurrently with this Proxy Statement to all shareholders.

By Order of the Board of Directors,

Mary Beth Gustafsson

Senior Vice President, General Counsel

and Corporate Secretary

Dated: March 31, 2020

ITT INC.❘ 2020 PROXY STATEMENT 82

Back to Contents

APPENDIX A

LIST OF COMPANIES UTILIZED FROM THE WILLIS TOWERS WATSON COMPENSATION DATA BANK (CDB) ANALYSIS

2019 BENCHMARK GROUP — WILLIS TOWERS WATSON CDB

(BENCHMARK DATA WAS SUBMITTED BY INDUSTRIALS, MATERIALS, AND ENERGY COMPANIES WITH REVENUE BETWEEN APPROXIMATELY $1.25 & $5.0 BILLION IN 2017 AND AGED TO REFLECT THE 2019 MARKET)

A.O. Smith | GATX | Rockwell Collins
Advanced Drainage Systems | GCP Applied Technologies | Rowan Companies
American Styrenics | Granite Construction | RPM International
Apex Tool Group | H.B. Fuller | Ryerson
AMETEK | Harsco | Sensata Technologies
Ashland | Herman Miller | Sensient Technologies
Brembo | Hexcel | Snap-on
Cabot | Hexion | Sonoco Products
Carpenter Technology | HNI | Steelcase
CF Industries | Hunt Consolidated | TimkenSteel
Chemtura | International Flavors & Fragrances | Toro
Cliffs Natural Resources | Kennametal | Transocean
CoorsTek | Kinross Gold | Trinity Industries
Cubic | Lincoln Electric | USG Corporation
Curtiss-Wright | Magellan Midstream Partners | Valvoline
Donaldson Company | Martin Marietta Materials | Vectrus
Encana Services | Meritor | Vulcan Materials
EnLink Midstream | Peabody Energy | W. R. Grace
Equifax | Pitney Bowes | Watts Water Technologies
Esterline Technologies | PolyOne | Westlake Chemical
Flowserve | Precision Drilling | Worthington Industries
Fortune Brands Home & Security |  |

ITT INC.❘ 2020 PROXY STATEMENT 83

Back to Contents

Back to Contents