XML 127 R45.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.19.3.a.u2
Fair Value of Financial Assets and Liabilities
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2019
Fair Value of Financial Assets and Liabilities [Abstract]  
FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL ASSETS AND LIABILITIES

NOTE 37

FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL ASSETS AND LIABILITIES

 

Fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The measurement of fair value assumes the sale transaction of an asset or the transference of the liability happens within the main asset or liability market, or the most advantageous market for the asset or liability.

 

For financial instruments with no available market prices, fair values have been estimated by using recent transactions in analogous instruments, and in the absence thereof, the present values or other valuation techniques based on mathematical valuation models sufficiently accepted by the international financial community. In the use of these models, consideration is given to the specific particularities of the asset or liability to be valued, and especially to the different kinds of risks associated with the asset or liability.

 

These techniques are significantly influenced by the assumptions used, including the discount rate, the estimates of future cash flows and prepayment expectations. Hence, the fair value estimated for an asset or liability may not coincide exactly with the price at which that asset or liability could be delivered or settled on the date of its valuation, and may not be justified in comparison with independent markets.

 

Except as detailed in the following table, management considers that the carrying amounts of financial assets and financial liabilities recognised in the consolidated financial statements approximate their fair values.

 

Determination of fair value of financial instruments

 

Below is a comparison between the value at which the Bank's financial assets and liabilities are recorded and their fair value as of December 31, 2019 and 2018:

 

   As of December 31, 
   2019   2018 
   Book value   Fair value   Book value   Fair value 
   MCh$   MCh$   MCh$   MCh$ 
Assets                
Financial derivative contracts   8,148,608    8,148,608    3,100,635    3,100,635 
Financial assets held for trading   270,204    270,204    77,041    77,041 
Loans and accounts receivable at amortised cost, net   31,775,420    34,602,793    29,331,001    30,505,023 
Loans and accounts receivable at FVOCI, net   66,065    66,065    68,588    68,588 
Debt instrument at FVOCI   4,010,272    4,010,272    2,394,323    2,394,323 
Guarantee deposits (margin accounts)   314,616    314,616    170,232    170,232 
                     
Liabilities                    
Deposits and interbank borrowings   26,010,067    26,200,921    23,597,863    23,770,106 
Financial derivative contracts   7,390,654    7,390,654    2,517,728    2,517,728 
Issued debt instruments and other financial liabilities   9,727,081    10,718,997    8,330,633    8,605,135 
Guarantees received (margin accounts)   994,714    994,714    371,512    371,512 

 

The fair value approximates the carrying amount of the following line items due to their short-term nature: cash and deposits-banks, cash items in process of collection and investments under resale or repurchase agreements.

 

In addition, the fair value estimates presented above do not attempt to estimate the value of the Bank's profits generated by its business activity, nor its future activities, and accordingly, they do not represent the Bank's value as a going concern. Below is a detail of the methods used to estimate the financial instruments' fair value.

  

a)Financial assets held for trading and Debt instruments at FVOCI

 

The estimated fair value of these financial instruments was established using market values or estimates from an available dealer, or quoted market prices of similar financial instruments. Investments are evaluated at recorded value since they are considered as having a fair value not significantly different from their recorded value. To estimate the fair value of debt investments or representative values in these lines of businesses, we take into consideration additional variables and elements, as long as they apply, including the estimate of prepayment rates and credit risk of issuers.

 

b)Loans and accounts receivable at amortised cost

 

Fair value of commercial, mortgage and consumer loans and credit cards are measured through a discounted cash flow (DCF) analysis. To do so, we use current market interest rates considering product, term, amount and similar loan quality. Fair value of loans with 90 days or more of delinquency are measured by means of the market value of the associated guarantee, minus the rate and term of expected payment. For variable rate loans whose interest rates change frequently (monthly or quarterly) and that are not subjected to any significant credit risk change, the estimated fair value is based on their book value.

 

c)Deposits

 

Disclosed fair value of deposits that do not bear interest and saving accounts is the amount payable at the reporting date and, therefore, equals the recorded amount. Fair value of time deposits is calculated through a discounted cash flow calculation that applies current interest rates from a monthly calendar of scheduled maturities in the market.

 

d)Short and long term issued debt instruments

 

The fair value of these financial instruments is calculated by using a discounted cash flow analysis based on the current incremental lending rates for similar types of loans having similar maturities.

 

e)Financial derivative contracts

 

The estimated fair value of financial derivative contracts is calculated using the prices quoted on the market for financial instruments having similar characteristics.

 

The fair value of interest rate swaps represents the estimated amount that the Bank determines as exit price in accordance with IFRS 13.

 

If there are no quoted prices from the market (either direct or indirect) for any derivative instrument, the respective fair value estimates have been calculated by using models and valuation techniques such as Black-Scholes, Hull, and Monte Carlo simulations, taking into consideration the relevant inputs/outputs such as volatility of options, observable correlations between underlying assets, counterparty credit risk, implicit price volatility, the velocity with which the volatility reverts to its average value, and the straight-line relationship (correlation) between the value of a market variable and its volatility, among others.

 

Measurement of fair value and hierarchy

 

IFRS 13 - Fair Value Measurement, provides a hierarchy of reasonable values which separates the inputs and/or valuation technique assumptions used to measure the fair value of financial instruments. The hierarchy reflects the significance of the inputs used in making the measurement. The three levels of the hierarchy of fair values are the following:

 

● Level 1: the inputs are quoted prices (unadjusted) on active markets for identical assets and liabilities that the Bank can access on the measurement date

 

● Level 2: inputs other than the quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly

 

● Level 3: inputs are unobservable inputs for the asset or liability i.e. they are not based on observable market data

 

The hierarchy level within which the fair value measurement is categorized in its entirety is determined based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety.

 

The best evidence of a financial instrument's fair value at the initial time is the transaction price.

 

In cases where quoted market prices cannot be observed, Management makes its best estimate of the price that the market would set using its own internal models which in most cases use data based on observable market parameters as a significant input (Level 2) and, in very specific cases, significant inputs not observable in market data (Level 3), various techniques are employed to make these estimates, including the extrapolation of observable market data.

 

Financial instruments at fair value and determined by quotations published in active markets (Level 1) include:

 

-Chilean Government and Department of Treasury bonds
-Mutual funds

 

Instruments which cannot be 100% observable in the market are valued according to other inputs observable in the market (Level 2).

 

The following financial instruments are classified under Level 2:

 

Type of
financial instrument
  Model
used in valuation
  Description of  unobservable inputs
● Mortgage and private bonds   Present Value of Cash Flows Model  

Internal Rates of Return ("IRRs") are provided by RiskAmerica, according to the following criterion:

 

If, at the valuation day, there are one or more valid transactions at the Santiago Stock Exchange for a given nemotechnic, the reported rate is the weighted average amount of the observed rates.

 

In the case there are no valid transactions for a given mnemonic on the valuation day, the reported rate is the IRR base from a reference structure, plus a spread model based on historical spread for the same item or similar ones.

         
 Time deposits   Present Value of Cash Flows Model  

IRRs are provided by RiskAmerica, according to the following criterion:

 

If, at the valuation day, there are one or more valid transactions at the Santiago Stock Exchange for a given mnemonic, the reported rate is the weighted average amount of the observed rates.

 

In the case there are no valid transactions for a given mnemonic on the valuation day, the reported rate is the IRR base from a reference structure, plus a spread model based on issuer curves.

         
 Constant Maturity Swaps (CMS), FX and Inflation Forward (Fwd), Cross Currency Swaps (CCS), Interest Rate Swap (IRS)   Present Value of Cash Flows Model  

IRRs are provided by ICAP, GFI, Tradition, and Bloomberg according to this criterion:

 

With published market prices, a valuation curve is created by the bootstrapping method and is then used to value different derivative instruments.

         
 FX Options   Black-Scholes  

Formula adjusted by the volatility simile (implicit volatility), Prices (volatility) are provided by BGC Partners, according to this criterion:

 

With published market prices, a volatility parameter is created by interpolation and then these volatilities are used to value options.

         
 Guarantee deposits, guarantee received (Threshold)   Present Value of Cash Flows Model  

Collateral associated to derivatives financial contracts: Average trading swap (CMS), FX and inflation Forward, Cross Currency Swap (CCS), Interest Rate Swap (IRS) y FX options.

 

In limited occasions significant inputs not observable in market data are used (Level 3). To carry out this estimate, several techniques are used, including extrapolation of observable market data or a mix of observable data.

 

The following financial instruments are classified under Level 3:

 

Type of

financial instrument

 

Model

used in valuation

  Description of no observable inputs
Caps/ Floors/ Swaptions   Black Normal Model for Cap/Floors and Swaptions   There is no observable input of implicit volatility.
UF options   Black – Scholes   There is no observable input of implicit volatility.
Cross currency swap with window   Hull-White   Hybrid HW model for rates and Brownian motion for FX There is no observable input of implicit volatility.
CCS (special contracts)   Implicit Forward Rate Agreement (FRA)   Start Fwd unsupported by MUREX (platform) due to the UF forward estimate.
Cross currency swap, Interest rate swap, Call money swap in Tasa Activa Bancaria (Active Bank Rate) TAB,   Present Value of Cash Flows Model   Validation obtained by using the interest curve and interpolating flow maturities, but TAB is not a directly observable variable and is not correlated to any market input.
Debt instruments (in our case, low liquidity bonds)   Present Value of Cash Flows Model   Valued by using similar instrument prices plus a charge-off rate by liquidity.
Loans and account receivable at FVOCI   Present Value of Cash Flows Model   Measured by discounting estimated cash flow using the interest rate of new contracts.

 

The Bank does not believe that any change in unobservable inputs with respect to level 3 instruments would result in a significantly different fair value measurement.

 

The following table presents the assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurrent basis:

 

   Fair value measurement 
As of December 31,  2019   Level 1   Level 2   Level 3 
   MCh$   MCh$   MCh$   MCh$ 
                 
Assets                
Financial assets held for trading   270,204    270,204    -    - 
Loans and accounts receivable at FVOCI, net   66,065    -    -    66,065 
Debt instruments at FVOCI   4,010,272    3,992,421    17,146    705 
Derivatives   8,148,608    -    8,133,700    14,908 
Guarantee deposits (margin accounts)   314,616    -    314,616    - 
Total   12,809,765    4,262,625    8,465,462    81,678 
                     
Liabilities                    
Derivatives   7,390,654    -    7,387,704    2,950 
Guarantees received (margin accounts)   994,714    -    994,714    - 
Total   8,385,368    -    8,382,418    2,950 

 

 

   Fair value measurement 
As of December 31,  2018   Level 1   Level 2   Level 3 
   MCh$   MCh$   MCh$   MCh$ 
                 
Assets                
Financial assets held for trading   77,041    71,158    5,883    - 
Loans and accounts receivable at FVOCI, net   68,588    -    -    68,588 
Debt instruments at FVOCI   2,394,323    2,368,768    24,920    635 
Derivatives   3,100,635    -    3,089,077    11,558 
Guarantee deposits (margin accounts)   170,232    -    170,232    - 
Total   5,810,819    2,439,926    3,290,112    80,781 
                     
                     
Liabilities                    
Derivatives   2,517,728    -    2,516,933    795 
Guarantees received (margin accounts)   371,512    -    371,512    - 
Total   2,889,240    -    2,888,445    795 

  

The following table presents assets or liabilities which are not measured at fair value in the statements of financial position but for which the fair value is disclosed:

 

   Fair value measurement 
As of December 31,  2019   Level 1   Level 2   Level 3 
   MCh$   MCh$   MCh$   MCh$ 
Assets                
Loans and accounts receivable at amortised cost, net   34,602,793    -    -    34,602,793 
Total   34,602,793    -    -    34,602,793 
Liabilities                    
Deposits and interbank borrowings   26,200,921    -    15,903,489    10,297,432 
Issued debt instruments and other financial liabilities   10,718,997    -    10,718,997    - 
Total   36,919,918    -    26,622,486    10,297,432 

 

 

   Fair value measurement 
As of December 31,  2018   Level 1   Level 2   Level 3 
   MCh$   MCh$   MCh$   MCh$ 
                 
Assets                
Loans and accounts receivable at amortised cost, net   30,505,023    -    -    30,505,023 
Total   30,505,023    -    -    30,505,023 
Liabilities                    
Deposits and interbank borrowings   23,770,106    -    15,028,689    8,741,417 
Issued debt instruments and other financial liabilities   8,605,135    -    8,605,135    - 
Total   32,375,241    -    23,633,824    8,741,417 

 

The fair values of other assets and other liabilities approximate their carrying values.

 

The methods and assumptions to estimate the fair value are defined below:

 

- Loans and amounts due from credit institutions and from customers – Fair value are estimated for groups of loans with similar characteristics. The fair value was measured by discounting estimated cash flow using the interest rate of new contracts. That is, the future cash flow of the current loan portfolio is estimated using the contractual rates, and then the new loans spread over the risk-free interest rate are incorporated to the risk-free yield curve in order to calculate the loan portfolio fair value. In terms of behavior assumptions, it is important to underline that a prepayment rate is applied to the loan portfolio, thus a more realistic future cash flow is achieved.

 

- Deposits and interbank borrowings – The fair value of deposits was calculated by discounting the difference between the cash flows on a contractual basis and current market rates for instruments with similar maturities. For variable-rate deposits, the carrying amount was considered to approximate fair value.

 

- Issued debt instruments and other financial liabilities – The fair value of long-term loans were estimated by cash flow discounted at the interest rate offered on the market with similar terms and maturities.

 

The valuation techniques used to estimate each level are defined in Note 1,k)

 

There were no transfer between levels 1 and 2 for the year ended December 31, 2019 and 2018.

  

The table below shows the effect, at December 31, 2019 and 2018, on the fair value of the main financial instruments classified as Level 3 of a reasonable change in the assumptions used in the valuation. This effect was determined by a sensitivity analysis under a 1bp scenario, detailed in the following table:

 

As of December 31, 2019
Instrument Level 3 Valuation technique Main unobservable
inputs
Impacts
(in MCh$)
Sens, -1bp Unfavorable
scenario
Impacts
(in MCh$)
Sens, +1bp
Favorable
scenario
Derivatives Present Value method Curves on TAB (1) (2,3) 2,3
Debt instruments at FVOCI Internal rate of return method BR UF (2) - -

 

 

As of December 31, 2018
Instrument Level 3 Valuation technique Main unobservable
inputs
Impacts
(in MCh$)
Sens, -1bp Unfavorable
scenario
Impacts
(in MCh$)
Sens, +1bp
Favorable
scenario
Derivatives Present Value method Curves on TAB (1) (1,3) 1,3
Available for sale investments Internal rate of return method BR UF (2) - -

 

(1)TAB: "Tasa Activa Bancaria" (Active Bank Rate). Average interest rates on 30, 90, 180 and 360 day deposits published by the Chilean Association of Banks and Financial Institutions (ABIF) in nominal currency (Chilean peso) and in real terms, adjusted for inflation (in Chilean unit of account (Unidad de Fomento - UF)).

(2)BR: "Bonos de Reconocimiento" (Recognition Bonds). The Recognition Bond is an instrument of money provided by the State of Chile to workers who joined the new pension system, which began operating since 1981.

 

The following table presents the Bank's activity for assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurrent basis using unobserved significant inputs (Level 3) as of December 31, 2019 and 2018:

 

   Assets   Liabilities 
   MCh$   MCh$ 
         
As of January 1, 2019   80,781    795 
           
Total realized and unrealized profits (losses)          
Included in statements of income   827    2,155 
Included in other comprehensive income   70    - 
Purchases, issuances, and loans (net)   -    - 
As of December 31, 2019   81,678    2,950 
           
Total profits or losses included in comprehensive income for 2019 that are attributable to change in unrealized profit (losses) related to assets or liabilities as of December 31, 2018   897    2,155 

  

   Assets   Liabilities 
   MCh$   MCh$ 
         
As of January 1, 2018   22,987    7 
           
Total realized and unrealized profits (losses)          
Included in statements of income   57,769    (802)
Included in other comprehensive income   25    - 
Purchases, issuances, and loans (net)   -    - 
As of December 31, 2018   80,781    (795)
           
Total profits or losses included in comprehensive income for 2018 that are attributable to change in unrealized profit (losses) related to assets or liabilities as of December 31, 2017   57,794    (802)

 

The realized and unrealized profits (losses) included in comprehensive income for 2019 and 2018, in the assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurrent basis through unobservable market data (Level 3) are recorded in the Statements of Comprehensive Income.

 

The potential effect as of December 31, 2019 and 2018 on the valuation of assets and liabilities valued at fair value on a recurrent basis through unobservable significant inputs (level 3), generated by changes in the principal assumptions if other reasonably possible assumptions that are less or more favorable were used, is not considered by the Bank to be significant.

 

The following tables show the financial instruments subject to compensation in accordance with IAS 32, for 2019 and 2018:

 

As of December 31, 2019

   Linked financial instruments, compensated in balance         
Financial instruments  Gross amounts   Compensated in balance   Net amount presented in balance   Remains of unrelated and / or unencumbered financial instruments   Amount in Statements of Financial Position 
Assets  Ch$ Million   Ch$ Million   Ch$ Million   Ch$ Million     
Financial derivative contracts   8,148,151    -    8,148,151    457    8,148,608 
Investments under resale agreements   -    -                
Loans and accounts receivable at amortised cost, net        -         31,775,420    31,775,420 
Loans and accounts receivable at FVOCI, net   66,065         -    66,065    66,065 
Total   8,214,216    -    8,148,151    31,841,942    39,990,093 
Liabilities                         
Financial derivative contracts   7,388,145    -    7,388,145    2,509    7,390,654 
Investments under resale agreements   380,055    -    380,055    -    380,055 
Deposits and interbank borrowings   -    -    -    26,010,067    26,010,067 
Total   7,768,200    -    7,768,200    26,012,576    33,780,776 

  

As of December 31, 2018
   Linked financial instruments, compensated in balance         
Financial instruments  Gross
amounts
   Compensated in
balance
   Net amount presented
in balance
   Remains of unrelated
and / or unencumbered
financial instruments
   Amount in
Statements of
Financial Position
 
Assets  Ch$ Million   Ch$ Million   Ch$ Million   Ch$ Million     
Financial derivative contracts   1,947,726    -    1,947,726    1,152,909    3,100,635 
Obligations under repurchase agreements   -    -    -    -    - 
Loans and accounts receivable at amortised cost, net   -    -    -    29,331,001    29,331,001 
Loans and accounts receivable at FVOCI, net   68,588    -    -    68,588    68,588 
Total   2,016,314    -    1,947,726    30,552,498    32,500,224 
Liabilities                         
Financial derivative contracts   1,735,555    -    1,735,555    782,173    2,517,728 
Investments under resale agreements   48,545    -    48,545    -    48,545 
Deposits and interbank borrowings   -    -    -    23,597,862    23,597,862 
Total   1,784,100    -    1,784,100    24,380,035    26,164,135 

 

The Bank, in order to reduce its credit exposure in its financial derivative operations, has entered into collateral contracts with its counterparties, in which it establishes the terms and conditions under which they operate. In terms collateral (received/delivered) operates when the net of the fair value of the financial instruments held exceed the thresholds defined in the respective contracts.

 

   As of December 31, 2019   As of December 31, 2018 
Financial derivative contracts  Assets   Liability   Assets   Liability 
   MM$   MM$   MM$   MM$ 
                 
Financial derivative contracts with collateral agreement threshold equal to zero   7,478,837    6,748,219    2,639,835    2,133,149 
Financial derivative contracts with non-zero threshold collateral agreement   532,298    517,814    344,520    262,683 
Financial derivative contracts without collateral agreement   137,472    124,621    116,280    121,896 
Total   8,148,607    7,390,654    3,100,635    2,517,728