XML 54 R16.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.3.0.814
Commitments and Contingencies
9 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2015
Commitments And Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract]  
Commitments and Contingencies

11.

COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Employment Agreements

We have employment agreements with certain of our executive officers. The agreements allow for annual compensation, participation in executive benefit plans, and performance-based cash bonuses.

Funding Agreement

In March 2010, we entered into a funding agreement with the Oklahoma City Economic Development Trust (the “Trust”) and the City of Oklahoma City. The Trust provided $2.0 million worth of certain public infrastructure improvements related to our newly constructed principal executive offices in northwest Oklahoma City. In exchange for the infrastructure improvements provided, we agreed to create at least 492 jobs over a five year period, with an average first year salary in excess of $37 thousand and make a minimum capital investment in the project of at least $15.0 million. We further agreed that we would be responsible for repayment of any amount that was not offset by earned job creation payments. As of December 31, 2014, we had fulfilled our obligation for these job creation payments.  

Legal Proceedings

On September 23, 2014, National Financial Partners Corp. (“NFP”) filed a complaint against us in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois (the “District Court”) (Civil Action No. 1:14-cv-07424). The complaint alleged trademark infringement, unfair competition, deceptive trade practices, consumer fraud and deceptive business practices related to the adoption and use of our logo and sought preliminary and permanent injunctions prohibiting us from continued infringement as well as money damages, including an accounting for sales and profits, attorneys’ fees and disgorgement of profits. NFP also moved for an order preliminarily enjoining us from using our logo.  On April 30, 2015, we filed an opposition to NFP’s motion for preliminary injunction.  On May 7 and 8, 2015, the District Court held a hearing on NFP’s motion for a preliminary injunction.  On June 10, 2015, the District Court entered an order granting a preliminary injunction in favor of NFP and thereafter issued its preliminary injunction on June 16, 2015.  On June 16, 2015, we filed an appeal of the District Court’s order and preliminary injunction to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit (Case No. 15-2289).  We further sought a stay of the preliminary injunction pending the appeal.  On June 30, 2015, the District Court granted our motion for a stay pending appeal.  On June 25, 2015, we filed an offer of judgment seeking to resolve all pending claims between the parties and terminate the action with the payment of $20 thousand by Paycom Payroll, LLC and an agreement to change our logo within 60 days.  Our offer of judgment was accepted by NFP and the District Court entered a judgment pursuant to the offer of judgment on July 6, 2015, terminating the District Court action.  The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals case was terminated on July 8, 2015.

We are involved in various other legal proceedings in the ordinary course of business. Although we cannot predict the outcome of these proceedings, legal matters are subject to inherent uncertainties and there exists the possibility that the ultimate resolution of these matters could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

Operating Leases and Deferred Rent

We lease office space under several noncancellable operating leases with contractual terms expiring from 2015 to 2021. Minimum rent expenses are recognized over the lease term. The lease term is defined as the fixed noncancellable term of the lease plus all periods, if any, for which failure to renew the lease imposes a penalty on us in an amount that a renewal appears, at the inception of the lease, to be reasonably assured. When a lease contains a predetermined fixed escalation of the minimum rent, we recognize the related rent expense on a straight-line basis and record the difference between the recognized rent expense and the amount payable under the lease as a liability. As of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, we had $0.8 million and $0.8 million, respectively, recorded as a liability for deferred rent.

 

 

Rent expense under operating leases for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, was $1.1 million and $3.3 million, respectively.  Rent expense under operating leases for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014, was $1.0 million and $2.4 million, respectively.