Level of consolidated financial indicators required by the Company to comply with

Filing of the case, processing suspended.

To maintain Leverage Ratio not higher than 1.2 times at its strictest level. The Leverage ratio is defined as the Total Liabilities divided by Total Equity.

Taxes, interests and other charges

$ 8,100

Payments for taxes, interests and other charges

$ 1,400

$ 50,000,000

Penalties payable as percentage of taxes paid

50% and 300%

Tax contingency, amount claimed

$ 14,400

$ 17,800

Tax contingency, amount under dispute

$ 32,200

Tax contingency, amount under dispute correspond to excess charge levied

7,000

Expected claim for differences in specific tax on mining activities

57,000

Guarantee obligations

$ 712

Description of lawsuits received

The Company and its subsidiaries have received no legal notice on lawsuits other than those indicated above, which exceed US$0.2 million.

Soquimich Comercial S.A. [Member]

Lawsuits, damages owed, value

$ 1,200

Collateral Security Carrying Value

$ 9,423

$ 12,103

Lawsuit one [Member]

Nancy Erika Urra Muñoz,

Fresia Flores Zamorano, Duratec-Vinilit S.A. and the Company and their Insurers.

December 2008.

1st Civil Court of Santiago.

Labor Accident.

Judgment favorable for the Company. Dated March 11, 2016. Appeal filed by the plaintiff which has not been pronounced on. Awaiting notification of the sentence, case filed on December 28, 2016

ThUS$550.

Lawsuit two [Member]

City of Pomona, California USA.

SQM North America Corporation (“SQM NA”).

December 2010.

United States District Court Central District of California.

Payment of expenses and other amounts related to the treatment of groundwater to allow for its consumption by removing the existing perchlorate in such groundwater that allegedly comes from Chilean fertilizers.

On May 17, 2018, district judge Gary Klausner sentenced in favor of SQM NA following the verdict of the jury. On September 14, 2018, the plaintiff filed a motion to appeal, which is pending resolution.

ThUS$32,000.

Lawsuit three [Member]

City of Lindsay, California USA.

SQM NA and the Company (still not noticed)

December 2010.

United States District Court Eastern District of California.

Not possible to determine.

Lawsuit four [Member]

H&V Van Mele N.V.

NV Euroports, SQM Europe N.V. and its insurance companies,

July 2013.

Commercial Court of Dendermonde,

Alleged indirect responsibility for the absence of adequate specifications for the SOP–WS by the Belgian distributor.

Sentencing against NV Euroports and subsidy SQM Europe N.V., for EUR 206,675.91. Appeal presented in November 2017.

ThUS$430.

Lawsuit five [Member]

Carlos Aravena Carrizo et al.

SQM Nitratos S.A. (“SQM Nitratos”) and its insurers.

May 2014.

18th Civil Court of Santiago.

Lawsuit seeking compensation for damages for alleged civil liability under tort as a result of an explosion that occurred during 2010 near Baquedano, causing the death of 6 employees.

Summons to hear sentence

ThUS$1,235.

Lawsuit six [Member]

Evt Consulting SpA.

SQM Nitratos.

October 2014.

23th Civil Court of Santiago.

Lawsuit seeking compensation for damages related to the termination of the purchase and sale agreement for metallic structures.

On November 13, 2017, the Santiago Appeals Court sentenced SQM Nitratos S.A. to pay US$304,620. An appeal in form and substance was presented before the Supreme Court in December 2017.

ThUS$835.

Lawsuit seven [Member]

SQM Salar S.A. (“SQM Salar”) and the Company.

Seguros Generales Suramericana S.A. (formerly - RSA Seguros Chile S.A.)

August 29, 2016.

Arbitration Court – Arbitrator Mr. Gonzalo Fernández.

Complaint for forced compliance and collection of indemnification for insurance claim of February 7 and 8, 2013.

Evidence stage.

ThUS$20,658.

Lawsuit eight [Member]

Tyne and Wear Pension Fund as represented by the Council of the Borough of South Tyneside acting as Lead Plaintiff.

The Company

Date : January 2016.

United States District Court – Southern District of New York.

Alleged damage to ADS holders of the Company resulting from alleged noncompliance with the securities regulations in the United States by the Company.

Initial stage of disclosure of background information.

Not determined.

Lawsuit nine [Member]

Ernesto Saldaña González et al.

SQM Salar S.A., SQM Industrial S.A. (“SQM Industrial”) and their insurance companies.

May 2016.

13th Civil Court of Santiago.

Lawsuit seeking compensation for damages for alleged civil liability under tort law arising from the accident that occurred in July 2014 in the María Elena location.

Summons to hear sentence

ThUS$515.

Lawsuit ten [Member]

María Yolanda Achiardi Tapia et al.

SQM Salar and its insurance companies and other 5 defendants

February 2015.

1st Civil Court of Antofagasta.

Lawsuit seeking compensation for damages for alleged civil liability under tort law arising from a traffic accident that occurred in April 2011 in the city of Antofagasta.

Summons to hear sentence.

ThUS$1,265.

Lawsuit eleven [Member]

The Company

AES Gener S.A. (“Gener”) and Empresa Eléctrica Cochrane SpA (“Cochrane”).

May 11, 2017.

Arbitration award in accordance with the arbitration rules established by the Center for Arbitration and Mediation of the Santiago Chamber of Commerce (“CAM).

Request for the interpretation of an electricity supply agreement alleging the right by the plaintiff to receive a collection in conformity with such agreement.

Evidentiary stage.

Not determined.

Lawsuit twelve [Member]

Gener and Cochrane.

The Company.

May 2017.

Arbitration in accordance with the rules established by the Center for Arbitration and Mediation (CAM).

Discrepancy with respect to the amount of an alleged right by the plaintiff to receive a collection in conformity with the agreement entered into by the parties.

Evidentiary stage.

Lawsuit thirteen [Member]

Not determined.

Transportes Buen Destino

SQM Salar.

None.

Arbitration in accordance with the rules established by the Center for Arbitration and Mediation (CAM).

Discrepancies generated in the implementation of the following contracts entered into between TBD and SQM Salar: (i) lithium brine transportation; and (ii) salt transportation.

Prior stage. The audience for setting procedure rules is pending

Lawsuit fourteen [Member]

Undetermined.

Castillo, Hernán et al.

Servicios Integrales de Tránsitos y Transferencias S.A. and SQM Industrial S.A.

September 15, 2017.

1st Labor Court of Santiago.

Lawsuit to assert labor rights, seeking collection of wages owed and other amounts.

On August 24, 2018, a judgment is issued rejecting the application in its entirety. On September 6, 2018, plaintiffs deduct an appeal for nullity before the Santiago Court of Appeals, which is still in branch.

ThUS$1,940.

Lawsuit fifteen [Member]

Acosta Tapia, Eloisa del Tránsito and others as successors and assigns of Araya Castillo, Raimundo del Rosario.

SQM Salar.

January 19, 2018.

2nd Labor Court of Santiago.

Lawsuit for damages for pain and suffering as a result of occupational illness.

On October 22, the final ruling was issued, wherein the claim was denied. The plaintiff filed an appeal for annulment, which is pending with the Court of Appeals of Santiago

ThUS$472.

Lawsuit sixteen [Member]

Asociación Indígena Consejo Pueblos Atacameños and others.

Corfo, the Company, SQM Salar and SQM Potasio S.A.

February 15, 2018.

Santiago Court of Appeals

Appeal requesting annulment of modifications to contracts signed by the defendants on January 17, 2018.

On September 25, the Court of Appeals of Santiago rejected the appeal for protection. On October 12, the Supreme Court ordered the revision of the appeal filed by the appellants.

Lawsuit seventeen [Member]

Undetermined.

The Society.

Office of the Superintendent of the Environment (“SMA”)

20 July 2017

Second Environmental Court of Santiago

Motion for review filed by the Company against ruling rejecting the compliance program for the Pampa Hermosa project.

On August 21, 2018, the Second Environmental Court of Santiago accepted the Company’s claim and ordered the SMA to take the procedure back to the stage prior to their sentencing that rejected the compliance program. This ruling was appealed with the Supreme Court on August 8, 2018.

Lawsuit eighteen [Member]

Amount involved: Undetermined.

Congresspersons Claudia Nathalie Mix Jiménez, Gael Fernanda Yeomans Araya, Camila Ruslay Rojas Valderrama et al.

CORFO. The entity has intervened as an independent third party.

September 6, 2018.

Special Magistrate, Mr. Alejandro Madrid Crohare.

To render null and void the contract for the Salar de Atacama Project signed between CORFO and SQM Salar.

Pending ruling on dilatory pleas and independent third-party status of companies and subsidiaries.