XML 83 R23.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT
v3.3.0.814

Variable Interest Entities | 9 Months Ended
--- | ---
Sep. 30, 2015
Variable Interest Entities [Abstract] |
Variable Interest Entities | Note 13 – Variable Interest Entities ASC 810 defines a VIE as an entity where the equity investors, as a group, lack either (1) the power through voting rights, or similar rights, to direct the activities of an entity that most significantly impact the entity’s economic performance, (2) the obligation to absorb the expected losses of the entity, (3) the right to receive the expected residual returns of the entity, or (4) sufficient equity at risk for the entity to finance its activities by it self. A variable interest is a contractual ownership, or other interest, that fluctuates with changes in the fair value of the VIE’s net assets exclusive of variable interests. Under ASC 810, as amended, a primary beneficiary is required to consolidate a V IE when it has a variable interest in a VIE that provides it with a controlling financial interest. For such purposes, the determination of whether a controlling financial interest exists is based on whether a single party has both the power to direct the activities of the VIE that most significantly impact the VIE’s economic performance and the obligation to absorb losses of the VIE or the right to receive benefits from the VIE that could potentially be significant. Consolidated Variable Interest Entities FHN holds variable interests in a proprietary residential mortgage securitization trust it established prior to 2008 as a source of liquidity for consumer lending operations. Based on its restrictive nature, the trust is considered a VIE as the holders of equity at risk do not have the power through voting rights or similar rights to direct the activities that most significantly impact the trusts’ economic performance. In situations where the retention of MSR and other retained interests, including residual interests, results in FHN potentially absorbing losses or receiving benefits that are significant to the trust, FHN is considered the primary beneficiary, as it is also assumed to have the power as servicer to m ost significantly impact the activities of the VIE. Consolidation of the trust results in the recognition of the trust proceeds as restricted borrowings since the cash flows on the securitized loans can only be used to settle the obligations due to the hol ders of the trust securities. Except for recourse due to breaches of representations and warranties made by FHN in connection with the sale of the loans to the trust, the creditors of the trust hold no recourse to the assets of FHN. The only trust include d in the September 30, 2015 and September 30, 2014 balance of consolidated proprietary residential mortgage securitizations is a HELOC securitization trust that has entered a rapid amortization period and for which FHN is obligate d to provide subordinated fund ing. During this period, cash payments from borrowers are accumulated to repay outstanding debt securities while FHN continues to make advances to borrowers when they draw on their lines of credit. FHN then transfers the newly generated receivables into th e securitization trust and is reimbursed only after other parties in the securitization have received all of the cash flows to which they are entitled. If loan losses requiring draws on the related monoline insurers’ policies, which protect bondholders in the securitization, exceed a certain level, FHN may not receive reimbursement for all of the funds advanced to borrowers, as the senior bondholders and the monoline insurers typically have priority for repayment. This securitization trust is currently cons olidated by FHN due to FHN's status as the Master Servicer for the securitization and the retention of a significant residual interest. Because the trust is consolidated, amounts funded from monoline insurance policies are considered as additional restrict ed term borrowings in FHN’s Consolidated Condensed Statements of Condition. FHN has established certain rabbi trusts related to deferred compensation plans offered to its employees. FHN contributes employee cash compensation deferrals to the trusts and dir ects the underlying investments made by the trusts. The assets of these trusts are available to FHN’s creditors only in the event that FHN becomes insolvent. These trusts are considered VIEs as there is no equity at risk in the trusts since FHN provided th e equity interest to its employees in exchange for services rendered. FHN is considered the primary beneficiary of the rabbi trusts as it has the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the economic performance of the rabbi trusts thr ough its ability to direct the underlying investments made by the trusts. Additionally, FHN could potentially receive benefits or absorb losses that are significant to the trusts due to its right to receive any asset values in excess of liability payoffs a nd its obligation to fund any liabilities to employees that are in excess of a rabbi trust’s assets.
The following table summarizes VIEs consolidated by FHN as of September 30, 2015 and 2014:
|  |  |  | September 30, 2015 |  | September 30, 2014 |
|  |  |  | On-Balance Sheet Consumer Loan Securitization |  | Rabbi Trusts Used for Deferred Compensation Plans |  | On-Balance Sheet Consumer Loan Securitization |  | Rabbi Trusts Used for Deferred Compensation Plans |
(Dollars in thousands) |  | Carrying Value |  | Carrying Value |  | Carrying Value |  | Carrying Value |
Assets: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Cash and due from banks |  |  | $ | 2,000 |  |  |  | N/A |  |  | $ | 300 |  |  |  | N/A |
Loans, net of unearned income |  |  |  | 59,258 |  |  |  | N/A |  |  |  | 81,111 |  |  |  | N/A |
| Less: Allowance for loan losses |  |  |  | 54 |  |  |  | N/A |  |  |  | 812 |  |  |  | N/A |
|  | Total net loans |  |  |  | 59,204 |  |  |  | N/A |  |  |  | 80,299 |  |  |  | N/A |
Other assets |  |  |  | 114 |  |  | $ | 66,490 |  |  |  | 438 |  |  | $ | 66,290 |
Total assets |  |  | $ | 61,318 |  |  | $ | 66,490 |  |  | $ | 81,037 |  |  | $ | 66,290 |
Liabilities: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Term borrowings |  |  | $ | 48,491 |  |  |  | N/A |  |  | $ | 70,720 |  |  |  | N/A |
Other liabilities |  |  |  | 3 |  |  | $ | 49,275 |  |  |  | 4 |  |  | $ | 50,477 |
Total liabilities |  |  | $ | 48,494 |  |  | $ | 49,275 |  |  | $ | 70,724 |  |  | $ | 50,477 |
Nonconsolidated Variable Interest Entities Low Income Housing Partnerships. First Tennessee Housing Corporation (“FTHC”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of FTBNA, makes equity investments as a limited partner in various partnerships that sponsor affordable housing projects utilizing the Low Income Housing Tax Credit (“LIHTC”) pursuant to Section 42 of the Internal Revenue Code. The purpose of these investments is to achieve a satisfactory return on capital and to support FHN’s community reinvestment initiatives. The activities of the limited partnerships include the identification, development, and operation of multi-family housing that is leased to qualifying res idential tenants generally within FHN’s primary geographic region. LIHTC partnerships are considered VIEs as FTHC, the holder of the equity investment at risk, does not have the ability to direct the activities that most significantly affect the performanc e of the entity through voting rights or similar rights. FTHC could absorb losses that are significant to the LIHTC partnerships as it has a risk of loss for its capital contributions and funding commitments to each partnership. The general partners are co nsidered the primary beneficiaries as managerial functions give them the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the entities’ economic performance and the managing members are exposed to all losses beyond FTHC’s initial capital contr ibutions and funding commitments. LIHTC investments that do not qualify for the proportional amortization method as defined in ASU 2014-01 and discussed in Note 1 are accounted for using the equity method. Expenses associated with these investments were n ot material for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014. The following table summarizes the impact to the Provision/(benefit) for income taxes on the Consolidated Condensed Statements of Income for the three and nine month periods endin g September 30, 2015 and 2014 for LIHTC investments accounted for under the p roportional amortization method.
|  | Three Months Ended |  | Nine Months Ended |  |
|  | September 30 |  | September 30 |  |
(Dollars in thousands) |  | 2015 |  | 2014 |  | 2015 |  | 2014 |
Provision/(benefit) for income taxes: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Amortization of qualifying LIHTC investments | $ | 2,293 | $ | 2,470 | $ | 6,653 | $ | 7,410 |  |
Low income housing tax credits |  | (2,363) |  | (2,462) |  | (7,089) |  | (7,387) |  |
Other tax benefits related to qualifying LIHTC investments |  | (819) |  | (1,859) |  | (2,418) |  | (5,578) |  |
Other Tax Credit Investments. First Tennessee New Markets Corporation (“FTNMC”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of FTBNA, makes equity investments through wholly-owned subsidiaries as a non-managing member in various limited liability companies (“LLCs”) that sponsor community development projects utilizing the New Market Tax Credit (“NMTC”) pursuant to Section 45 of the Internal Revenue Code. The purpose of these investments is to achieve a satisfactory return on capital and to support FHN’s community reinvest ment initiatives. The activities of the LLCs include providing investment capital for low-income communities within FHN’s primary geographic region. A portion of the funding of FTNMC’s investment in a NMTC LLC is obtained via a loan from an unrelated third-party that is typically a community development enterprise. The NMTC LLCs are considered VIEs as FTNMC, the holder of the equity investment at risk, does not have the ability to direct the activities that most significantly affect the performance of the e ntity through voting rights or similar rights. While FTNMC could absorb losses that are significant to the NMTC LLCs as it has a risk of loss for its initial capital contributions, the managing members are considered the primary beneficiaries as managerial functions give them the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the NMTC LLCs’ economic performance and the managing members are exposed to all losses beyond FTNMC’s initial capital contributions. FTHC also makes equity investments as a limited partner or non-managing member in entities that receive Historic Tax Credits pursuant to Section 47 of the Internal Revenue Code. The purpose of these entities is the rehabilitation of historic buildings with the tax credits provided to incent private investment in the historic cores of cities and towns. These entities are considered VIEs as FTHC, the holder of the equity investment at risk, does not have the ability to direct the activities that most significantly affect the performance of the entity through voting rights or similar rights. FTHC could absorb losses that are significant to the entities as it has a risk of loss for its capital contributions and funding commitments to each partnership. The managing members are considered the prima ry beneficiaries as managerial functions give them the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the entities’ economic performance and the managing members are exposed to all losses beyond FTHC’s initial capital contributions and fundi ng commitments. Small Issuer Trust Preferred Holdings. FTBNA holds variable interests in trusts which have issued mandatorily redeemable preferred capital securities (“trust preferreds”) for smaller banking and insurance enterprises. FTBNA has no voting ri ghts for the trusts’ activities. The trusts’ only assets are junior subordinated debentures of the issuing enterprises. The creditors of the trusts hold no recourse to the assets of FTBNA. These trusts meet the definition of a VIE as the holders of the equ ity investment at risk do not have the power through voting rights, or similar rights, to direct the activities that most significantly impact the trusts’ economic performance. Based on the nature of the trusts’ activities and the size of FTBNA’s holdings, FTBNA could potentially receive benefits or absorb losses that are significant to the trusts regardless of whether a majority of a trust’s securities are held by FTBNA. However, since FTBNA is solely a holder of the trusts’ securities, it has no rights wh ich would give it the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the trusts’ economic performance and thus it is not considered the primary beneficiary of the trusts. FTBNA has no contractual requirements to provide financial support to the trusts. On-Balance Sheet Trust Preferred Securitization. In 2007, FTBNA executed a securitization of certain small issuer trust preferreds for which the underlying trust meets the definition of a VIE as the holders of the equity investment at risk do n ot have the power through voting rights, or similar rights, to direct the activities that most significantly impact the entity’s economic performance. FTBNA could potentially receive benefits or absorb losses that are significant to the trust based on the size and priority of the interests it retained in the securities issued by the trust. However, since FTBNA did not retain servicing or other decision making rights, FTBNA is not the primary beneficiary as it does not have the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the trust’s economic performance. Accordingly, FTBNA has accounted for the funds received through the securitization as a term borrowing in its Consolidated Condensed Statements of Condition. FTBNA has no contractual require ments to provide financial support to the trust. Proprietary Trust Preferred Issuances. FHN previously issued junior subordinated debt to First Tennessee Capital II (“Capital II”). Capital II was considered a VIE as FHN’s capital contributions to this trust we re not considered “at risk” in evaluating whether the holders of the equity investments at risk in the trust had the power through voting rights, or similar rights, to direct the activities that most significantly impacted the entity’s economic performa nce. FHN was not the trust’s primary beneficiary as FHN’s capital contributions to the trust were not considered variable interests as they were not “at risk”. Consequently, Capital II was not consolidated by FHN. In third quarter 2015 FHN redeemed its jun ior subordinated debt, and as a result Capital II redeemed its 6.30 percent Capital Securities, Series B, and the trust was collapsed. Proprietary Residential Mortgage Securitizations. FHN holds variable interests in proprietary residential mortgage securitization trusts it establish ed prior to 2008 as a source of liquidity for its mortgage banking operations. Except for recourse due to breaches of representations and warranties made by FHN in connection with the sale of the loans to the trusts, the creditors of the trusts hold no rec ourse to the assets of FHN. Additionally, FHN has no contractual requirements to provide financial support to the trusts. Based on their restrictive nature, the trusts are considered VIEs as the holders of equity at risk do not have the power through votin g rights, or similar rights, to direct the activities that most significantly impact the trusts’ economic performance. While FHN is assumed to have the power as servicer to most significantly impact the activities of such VIEs, in situations where FHN does not have the ability to participate in significant portions of a securitization trust’s cash flows FHN is not considered the primary beneficiary of the trust. Therefore, these trusts are not consolidated by FHN. Agency Residential Mortgage Securitizatio ns. Prior to third quarter 2008, FHN transferred first lien mortgages that were included in Agency-sponsored securitizations and retained MSR and in certain situations various other interests. Except for recourse due to breaches of representations and warr anties made by FHN in connection with the sale of the loans to the trusts, the creditors of the trusts held no recourse to the assets of FHN. Additionally, FHN had no contractual requirements to provide financial support to the trusts. The Agencies' or des ignated third parties' status as Master Servicer and the rights they hold consistent with their guarantees on the securities issued provide them with the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the trusts’ economic performance. Thus, such trusts were not consolidated by FHN as it was not considered the primary beneficiary even in situations where it could potentially receive benefits or absorb losses that were significant to the trusts. Holdings & Short Positions in Agency Mortgage-Bac ked Securities. FHN holds securities issued by various Agency securitization trusts. Based on their restrictive nature, the trusts meet the definition of a VIE since the holders of the equity investments at risk do not have the power through voting rights, or similar rights, to direct the activities that most significantly impact the entities’ economic performance. FHN could potentially receive benefits or absorb losses that are significant to the trusts based on the nature of the trusts’ activities and the size of FHN’s holdings. However, FHN is solely a holder of the trusts’ securities and does not have the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the trusts’ economic performance, and is not considered the primary beneficiary of the tr usts. FHN has no contractual requirements to provide financial support to the trusts. Commercial Loan Troubled Debt Restructurings. For certain troubled commercial loans, FTBNA restructures the terms of the borrower’s debt in an effort to increase the prob ability of receipt of amounts contractually due. Following a troubled debt restructuring, the borrower entity typically meets the definition of a VIE as the initial determination of whether an entity is a VIE must be reconsidered as events have proven that the entity’s equity is not sufficient to permit it to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support or a restructuring of the terms of its financing. As FTBNA does not have the power to direct the activities that most significan tly impact such troubled commercial borrowers’ operations, it is not considered the primary beneficiary even in situations where, based on the size of the financing provided, FTBNA is exposed to potentially significant benefits and losses of the borrowing entity. FTBNA has no contractual requirements to provide financial support to the borrowing entities beyond certain funding commitments established upon restructuring of the terms of the debt that allows for preparation of the underlying collateral for sal e. Managed Discretionary Trusts. FHN serves as manager over certain discretionary trusts for which it makes investment decisions on behalf of the trusts’ beneficiaries in return for a reasonable management fee. The trusts meet the definition of a VIE since the holders of the equity investments at risk do not have the power, through voting rights or similar rights, to direct the activities that most significantly impact the entities’ economic performance. The management fees FHN receives are not considered v ariable interests in the trusts as all of the requirements related to permitted levels of decision maker fees are met. Therefore, the VIEs are not consolidated by FHN as it is not the trusts’ primary beneficiary. FHN has no contractual requirements to prov ide financial support to the trusts.
The following table summarizes FHN’s nonconsolidated VIEs as of September 30, 2015: |
|  | Maximum |  | Liability |  |  |
(Dollars in thousands) |  | Loss Exposure | Recognized | Classification |
Type |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Low income housing partnerships |  | $ | 76,982 |  |  | $ | 22,224 |  | (a) |
Other Tax Credit Investments (b) (c) |  |  | 21,359 |  |  |  | - |  | Other assets |
Small issuer trust preferred holdings (d) |  |  | 344,291 |  |  |  | - |  | Loans, net of unearned income |
On-balance sheet trust preferred securitization |  |  | 50,037 |  |  |  | 64,137 |  | (e) |
Proprietary and agency residential mortgage securitizations |  |  | 25,105 |  |  |  | - |  | (g) |
Holdings of agency mortgage-backed securities (d) |  |  | 4,030,604 |  |  |  | - |  | (h) |
Short positions in agency mortgage-backed securities (f) |  |  | N/A |  |  |  | 896 |  | Trading liabilities |
Commercial loan troubled debt restructurings (i) (j) |  |  | 29,280 |  |  |  | - |  | Loans, net of unearned income |
Managed discretionary trusts (f) |  |  | N/A |  |  |  | N/A |  | N/A |
Maximum loss exposure represents $54.8 million of current investments and $22.2 million of accrued contractual funding commitments. Accrued funding commitments represent unconditional contractual obligations for future funding events, and are also recognized in Other Liabilities. FHN currently expects to be required to fund these accrued commitments by the end of 2016. A lia bility is not recognized as investments are written down over the life of the related tax credit. Maximum loss exposure represe nts current investment balance. Of the initial investment, $1 8.0 million was funded through loans from community development enterprises. Maximum loss exposure represents the value of current investments. A liability is not recognized as FHN is solely a ho lder of the trusts’ securities. Includes $112.5 million classified as Loans, net of unearned income, and $1.7 million classified as Trading securities which are offset by $64.1 million classified as Term borrowings. No exposure to loss due to the nature of FHN’s involvement. Includes $.6 million classified as MSR related to proprietary and agency residential mortgage securitizations and $4.6 million classified as Trading securities related to proprietary residential mortgage securitizations. Aggregate servi cing advances of $19.9 million are classified as Other assets. Includes $549.2 million classified as Trading securities and $3.5 billion cla ssified as Securities available-for-sale. Maximum loss exposure represents $29.2 million of current receivables and $.1 million of contractual funding commitments on loans related to commercial borrowers involved in a troubled debt restructuring. A liability is not recognized as the loans are the only variable interests held in the troubled commercial borrowers’ operati ons.
The following table summarizes FHN's nonconsolidated VIEs as of September 30, 2014:
|  | Maximum |  | Liability |  |  |
(Dollars in thousands) |  | Loss Exposure | Recognized | Classification |
Type |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Low income housing partnerships |  | $ | 63,921 |  | $ | 5,937 |  | (a) |
Other Tax Credit Investments (b) (c) |  |  | 22,077 |  |  | - |  | Other assets |
Small issuer trust preferred holdings (d) |  |  | 364,912 |  |  | - |  | Loans, net of unearned income |
On-balance sheet trust preferred securitization |  |  | 52,320 |  |  | 61,853 |  | (e) |
Proprietary trust preferred issuances (f) |  |  | N/A |  |  | 206,186 |  | Term borrowings |
Proprietary and agency residential mortgage securitizations |  |  | 26,973 |  |  | - |  | (g) |
Holdings of agency mortgage-backed securities (d) |  |  | 3,843,125 |  |  | - |  | (h) |
Commercial loan troubled debt restructurings (i) (j) |  |  | 55,539 |  |  | - |  | Loans, net of unearned income |
Managed discretionary trusts (f) |  |  | N/A |  |  | N/A |  | N/A |
Certain previously reported amounts have been revised to reflect the retroactive effect of the adoption of ASU 2014-01, “Equity Method and Joint Ventures: Accounting for Investments in Qualified Affordable Housing Projects.” See Note 1—Financial Information for additional information. Maximum loss exposure represents $58.0 million of current investments and $5.9 million of accrued contractual funding commitments. Accrued funding commitments represent unconditional contractual obligations for futu re funding events, and are also recognized in Other Liabilities. FHN currently expects to be required to fund these accrued commitments by the end of 2016. A liability is not recognized as investments are written down over the life of the related tax credi t. Maximum loss exposure represents current investment balance. Of the initial investment, $18.0 million was funded through loans from community development enterprises. Maximum loss exposure represents the value of current investments. A liability is not recognized as FHN is solely a holder of the trusts’ securities. Includes $112.5 million classified as Loans, net of unearned income, and $1.7 million classified as Trading securities which are offset by $61.9 million classified as Term borrowings. No expos ure to loss due to the nature of FHN’s involveme nt. Includes $.9 million classified as MSR related to proprietary and agency residential mortgage securitizations and $6.1 million classified as Trading securities related to proprietary and agency residentia l mortga ge securitizations. Aggregate servicing advances of $19.9 million are classified as Other assets. Includes $502.6 million classified as Trading securities and $3.3 billion cla ssified as Securities available-for-sale. Maximum loss exposure represent s $52.4 million of current receivables and $3.1 million of contractual funding commitments on loans related to commercial borrowers involved in a troubled debt restructuring. A liability is not recognized as the loans are the only variable interests held in the troubled commercial borrowers’ operations.

X
- Definition Variable Interest Entities. + References No definition available. + Details
Name: | fhn_VariableInterestEntitiesAbstract
Namespace Prefix: | fhn_
Data Type: | xbrli:stringItemType
Balance Type: | na
Period Type: | duration

X
- Definition Tabular disclosure of the significant judgments and assumptions made in determining whether a variable interest (as defined) held by the entity requires the variable interest entity (VIE) (as defined) to be consolidated and (or) disclose information about its involvement with the VIE, individually or in aggregate (as applicable); the nature of restrictions, if any, on the consolidated VIE's assets and on the settlement of its liabilities reported by an entity in its statement of financial position, including the carrying amounts of such assets and liabilities; the nature of, and changes in, the risks associated with involvement in the VIE; how involvement with the VIE affects the entity's financial position, financial performance, and cash flows; the lack of recourse if creditors (or beneficial interest holders) of the consolidated VIE have no recourse to the general credit of the primary beneficiary (if applicable); the terms of arrangements, giving consideration to both explicit arrangements and implicit variable interests, if any, that could require the entity to provide financial support to the VIE, including events or circumstances that could expose the entity to a loss; the methodology used by the entity for determining whether or not it is the primary beneficiary of the variable interest entity; the significant factors considered and judgments made in determining that the power to direct the activities of a VIE that most significantly impact the VIE's economic performance are shared (as defined); the carrying amounts and classification of assets and liabilities of the VIE included in the statement of financial position; the entity's maximum exposure to loss, if any, as a result of its involvement with the VIE, including how the maximum exposure is determined and significant sources of the entity's exposure to the VIE; a comparison of the carrying amounts of the assets and liabilities and the entity's maximum exposure to loss; information about any liquidity arrangements, guarantees, and (or) other commitments by third parties that may affect the fair value or risk of the entity's variable interest in the VIE; whether or not the entity has provided financial support or other support (explicitly or implicitly) to the VIE that it was not previously contractually required to provide or whether the entity intends to provide that support, including the type and amount of the support and the primary reasons for providing the support; and supplemental information the entity determines necessary to provide. + References Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 810 -SubTopic 10 -Section 50 -Paragraph 6 -URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=52262685&loc=d3e5747-111685 Reference 2: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 810 -SubTopic 10 -Section 50 -Paragraph 9 -URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=52262685&loc=SL6228884-111685 Reference 3: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 810 -SubTopic 10 -Section 50 -Paragraph 4 -URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=52262685&loc=d3e5728-111685 Reference 4: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Glossary Variable Interest Entity -URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6528138 Reference 5: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 810 -SubTopic 10 -Section 50 -Paragraph 5A -URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=52262685&loc=SL6759159-111685 Reference 6: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 810 -SubTopic 10 -Section 50 -Paragraph 3 -URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=52262685&loc=d3e5710-111685 + Details
Name: | us-gaap_ScheduleOfVariableInterestEntitiesTextBlock
Namespace Prefix: | us-gaap_
Data Type: | nonnum:textBlockItemType
Balance Type: | na
Period Type: | duration