XML 56 R19.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.23.1
Asbestos
12 Months Ended
Mar. 31, 2023
Asbestos [Abstract]  
Asbestos AsbestosThe AFFA was approved by shareholders in February 2007 to provide long-term funding to AICF. For a discussion of the AFFA and the accounting policies utilized by the Company related to the AFFA and AICF, see Note 1.
Asbestos Adjustments loss
The Asbestos adjustments loss included in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income comprise the following:
 
Years Ended 31 March
(Millions of US dollars)202320222021
Change in estimates:
Change in actuarial estimate - asbestos liability$56.0 $145.6 $33.0 
Change in actuarial estimate - insurance receivable(0.1)(5.3)(2.0)
Change in estimate - AICF claims-handling costs1.2 0.6 1.5 
Subtotal - Change in estimates57.1 140.9 32.5 
Effect of foreign exchange on Asbestos net liabilities(45.9)(13.2)123.0 
Loss (gain) on foreign currency forward contracts24.5 5.3 (11.7)
Other1.3 (1.3)0.1 
Asbestos adjustments loss$37.0 $131.7 $143.9 

Actuarial Study; Claims Estimate
AICF commissioned an updated actuarial study of potential asbestos-related liabilities as of 31 March 2023. Based on KPMG’s assumptions, KPMG arrived at a range of possible total cash flows and calculated a central estimate, which is intended to reflect a probability-weighted expected outcome of those actuarial estimated future cash flows.
The following table sets forth the central estimates, net of insurance recoveries, calculated by KPMG as of 31 March 2023:
As of 31 March 2023
(Millions of US and Australian dollars, respectively)US$ A$
Central Estimate – Discounted and Inflated1,012.0 1,508.0 
Central Estimate – Undiscounted but Inflated1,289.0 1,920.8 
Central Estimate – Undiscounted and Uninflated895.6 1,334.6 
The asbestos liability has been revised to reflect the most recent undiscounted and uninflated actuarial estimate prepared by KPMG as of 31 March 2023.
In estimating the potential financial exposure, KPMG has made a number of assumptions, including, but not limited to, assumptions related to the peak period of claims, total number of claims that are reasonably estimated to be asserted through 2071, the typical cost of settlement (which is sensitive to, among other factors, the industry in which a plaintiff claims exposure, the alleged disease type, the age of the claimant and the jurisdiction in which the action is brought), the legal costs incurred in the litigation of such claims, the rate of receipt of claims, the settlement strategy in dealing with outstanding claims and the timing of settlements. Changes to the assumptions may be necessary in future periods should mesothelioma claims reporting escalate or decline.
Due to inherent uncertainties in the legal and medical environment, the number and timing of future claim notifications and settlements, the recoverability of claims against insurance contracts, and estimates of future trends in average claim awards, as well as the extent to which the above named entities will contribute to the overall settlements, the actual liability could differ materially from that which is currently recorded.
The potential range of costs as estimated by KPMG is affected by a number of variables such as nil settlement rates, peak year of claims, past history of claims numbers, average settlement rates, past history of Australian asbestos-related medical injuries, current number of claims, average defense and plaintiff legal costs, base wage inflation and superimposed inflation. The potential range of losses disclosed includes both asserted and unasserted claims.
A sensitivity analysis was performed by KPMG to determine how the actuarial estimates would change if certain assumptions (i.e., the rate of inflation and superimposed inflation, the average costs of claims and legal fees, and the projected numbers of claims) were different from the assumptions used to determine the central estimates. The sensitivity analysis performed in the actuarial report is directly related to the discounted but inflated central estimate and the undiscounted but inflated central estimate. The actual cost of the liabilities could be outside of that range depending on the results of actual experience relative to the assumptions made.
The following table summarizes the results of the analysis:
As of 31 March 2023
(Millions of US and Australian dollars, respectively)US$A$
Discounted (but inflated) - Low
783.5 1,167.5 
Discounted (but inflated) - High
1,581.8 2,357.0 
Undiscounted (but inflated) - Low
978.3 1,457.8 
Undiscounted (but inflated) - High
2,114.9 3,151.4 
Potential variation in the estimated peak period of claims has an impact much greater than the other assumptions used to derive the discounted central estimate. In performing the sensitivity assessment of the estimated incidence pattern reporting for mesothelioma, if the pattern of incidence was shifted by two years, the central estimate could increase by approximately 21% on a discounted basis.
Claims Data
The following table shows the activity related to the numbers of open claims, new claims and closed claims during each of the past five years and the average settlement per settled claim and case closed:
 
For the Years Ended 31 March
  20232022202120202019
Number of open claims at beginning of period365 360 393 332 336 
Number of new claims
Direct claims403 411 392 449 430 
Cross claims152 144 153 208 138 
Number of closed claims561 550 578 596 572 
Number of open claims at end of period359 365 360 393 332 
Average settlement amount per settled claimA$303,000A$314,000A$248,000A$277,000A$262,000
Average settlement amount per case closed 1
A$271,000A$282,000A$225,000A$245,000A$234,000
Average settlement amount per settled claimUS$208,000US$232,000US$178,000US$189,000US$191,000
Average settlement amount per case closed 1
US$186,000US$208,000US$162,000US$167,000US$171,000
 1 The average settlement amount per case closed includes nil settlements.
Under the terms of the AFFA, the Company has rights of access to actuarial information produced for AICF by the actuary appointed by AICF, which is currently KPMG. The Company’s disclosures with respect to claims statistics are subject to it obtaining such information, however, the AFFA does not provide the Company an express right to audit or otherwise require independent verification of such information or the methodologies to be adopted by the approved actuary. As such, the Company relies on the accuracy and completeness of the information provided by AICF to the approved actuary and the resulting information and analysis of the approved actuary when making disclosures with respect to claims statistics.
The following is a detailed rollforward of the Net Unfunded AFFA liability, net of tax, for the fiscal year ended 31 March 2023:
(Millions of US dollars)  Asbestos
Liability
Insurance
Receivables
Restricted
Cash and
Investments
Other
Assets
and
Liabilities
Net
Unfunded
AFFA
Liability
Deferred
Tax
Assets
Income
Tax
Payable
Net
Unfunded
AFFA
Liability,
net of tax
Opening Balance - 31 March 2022
$(1,143.7)$45.7 $261.6 $(1.1)$(837.5)$360.1 $43.9 $(433.5)
Asbestos claims paid106.8 — (106.8)— — — — — 
Payment received in accordance with AFFA— — 109.6 — 109.6 — — 109.6 
AICF claims-handling costs incurred (paid)1.1 — (1.1)— — — — — 
AICF operating costs paid - non claims-handling— — (1.5)— (1.5)— — (1.5)
Change in actuarial estimate(56.0)0.1 — — (55.9)— — (55.9)
Change in claims handling cost estimate(1.2)— — — (1.2)— — (1.2)
Impact on deferred income tax due to change in actuarial estimate— — — — — 17.1 — 17.1 
Insurance recoveries— (6.2)6.2 — — — — — 
Movement in income tax payable— — — — — (41.1)1.0 (40.1)
Other movements— — 1.8 — 1.8 (1.2)0.3 0.9 
Effect of foreign exchange115.9 (4.6)(25.1)0.5 86.7 (36.3)(4.5)45.9 
Closing Balance - 31 March 2023
$(977.1)$35.0 $244.7 $(0.6)$(698.0)$298.6 $40.7 $(358.7)
AICF Funding
During the fiscal years ended 31 March 2023, 2022 and 2021, the Company contributed US$109.6 million (A$158.8 million), US$248.5 million (A$328.2 million) and US$153.3 million (A$220.9 million), respectively, to AICF.
Restricted Investments
AICF invests its excess cash in time deposits, which are classified as HTM investments and the carrying value materially approximates the fair value for each investment. The following table represents the investments outstanding as of 31 March 2023:
Date InvestedMaturity DateInterest RateA$ Millions
February 202313 July 20234.74%70.0
February 202313 October 20234.74%40.0
February 202313 January 20244.74%39.0
February 202313 February 20244.74%1.0
April 20225 April 20242.75%54.0
January 202225 January 20241.41%30.0
October 20216 October 20230.60%30.0
AICF – NSW Government Secured Loan Facility
AICF may borrow, subject to certain conditions, up to an aggregate amount of A$320.0 million (US$214.8 million, based on the exchange rate at 31 March 2023). The AICF Loan Facility is guaranteed by the Former James Hardie Companies and is available to be drawn for the payment of claims through 1 November 2030, at which point, all outstanding borrowings must be repaid. At 31 March 2023 and 2022, AICF had no amounts outstanding under the AICF Loan Facility.