The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”). Any reference in these notes to applicable guidance is meant to refer to the authoritative GAAP as found in the Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) and Accounting Standards Updates (“ASUs”) of the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”).

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Significant items subject to such estimates and assumptions include, but are not limited to, the allowance for doubtful accounts, determination of revenue recognition under ASC 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (“ASC 606”), estimated benefit period of deferred contract acquisition costs, estimated life of prepaid marketing expense, and historical valuation of common stock and stock-based compensation, including fair value of the warrants.

Operating segments are defined as components of an entity for which separate financial information is available and that is regularly reviewed by the Chief Operating Decision Maker (“CODM”) in deciding how to allocate resources to an individual segment and in assessing performance. The Company’s CODM is its Chief Executive Officer. The Company has determined that it operates in one operating segment and one reportable segment as the CODM reviews financial information presented on a consolidated basis for purposes of making operating decisions, allocating resources, and evaluating financial performance.

The key measure of segment profit or loss that the CODM uses to make operating decisions, allocate resources and evaluate financial performance is the Company’s consolidated net loss, as reported in the Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss. Net loss is used to plan and forecast for future periods, design and implement key marketing strategies, expand into new markets, and launch new offerings. Significant expense categories regularly provided to the CODM are those disclosed in the Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss. There are no other expenses supplemental to those disclosed in these consolidated financial statements that are regularly provided to the CODM.

The Company derives revenue primarily from subscription fees related to access to its cloud-based SaaS platform. The platform enables customers to store and use first-party consumer data to deliver personalized consumer experiences across multiple digital communication channels and access data-driven marketing, customer service, analytics, and data platform functionality.

Contractual subscriptions for customers generally auto-renew on either a monthly, quarterly, or annual basis, and customers may elect not to renew by providing at least five days’ advance notice for contracts on a monthly billing cycle and thirty days’ advance notice for contracts with any other billing cycles. Customers do not have the right to take possession of the Company’s software. Subscription pricing is determined based on a customer’s profile count and messaging quantities and is considered fixed based on a tiered pricing structure. Variable consideration in the Company’s contracts is not material but represents the overage charges incurred by customers who exceed their allotments.

The Company recognizes revenue under the core principle that depicts the transfer of control to the Company’s customers in an amount reflecting the consideration to which the Company expects to be entitled. In order to achieve that core principle, the Company evaluates its revenue arrangements under the five-step model as follows: (1) identify the contract with a customer, (2) identify the performance obligations in the contract, (3) determine the transaction price, (4) allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract, and (5) recognize revenue when or as the Company satisfies a performance obligation.

Typically, the SaaS subscription contracts consist of a single performance obligation, and revenue is recognized over time as the performance obligation is satisfied. The performance obligation is deemed to be satisfied ratably as the customer simultaneously receives and consumes the services that the Company performs over the contract term. Due to the term of a majority of the Company’s contracts being less than one year, the Company has determined a significant financing component does not exist.

The Company accounts for individual performance obligations separately if they have been determined to be distinct (i.e., the services are distinct if identifiable from other items in the arrangement and the customer can benefit from them on their own or with other resources that are readily available). The transaction price is allocated to the distinct performance

Sales and value-added taxes collected from customers and remitted to government authorities are excluded from revenue. The Company incurs fees based on transaction volume and dollar amounts processed through its credit card processor, which are classified as general and administrative expense. Through the Company’s credit card processor, all receivables related to credit cards are collected within three business days.

Cost of revenue consists of costs related to supporting and hosting the Company’s software platform and channel offering for paying customers. These costs primarily include cloud-based infrastructure costs, outbound communication sending costs, employee-related costs including payroll, benefits, bonuses, and stock-based compensation expense related to the customer support team, amortization of capitalized internal-use software development costs, and allocated overhead costs, including rent, facilities, depreciation, and costs related to information technology.

Deferred contract acquisition costs are incremental costs incurred in connection with acquiring a customer contract and consist primarily of sales commissions and the associated payroll taxes. The Company expects to benefit from these costs for more than one year as the Company primarily pays sales commissions on the initial contract, and there are no commensurate commissions paid on contract renewals.

Deferred contract acquisition costs are amortized on a basis consistent with the transfer of the services to which the asset relates. This results in capitalized costs being recognized on a ratable basis over the estimated period of future benefit ranging from 18 months to 60 months. The Company estimates the future period of benefit considering the size of the customer, the current contract term, the impact of estimated customer renewal terms, and the estimated life of the technology solution underlying the contracts. The Company periodically reviews the carrying amount of capitalized costs to determine whether events or changes in circumstances have occurred that could impact the period of benefit.

As of December 31, 2025 and 2024, deferred contract acquisition costs expected to be recognized within one year were $29.6 million and $20.5 million, respectively, and deferred contract acquisition costs expected to be recognized beyond one year were $47.8 million and $32.5 million, respectively.

On July 28, 2022, the Company entered into a collaboration agreement with Shopify Inc. and certain of its affiliates (collectively, “Shopify”) to form a strategic relationship for the purposes of creating greater interoperability between the Klaviyo and Shopify platforms and forming a strategic product, distribution, and marketing relationship. Shopify became a related party upon execution of this agreement. The collaboration agreement has a term of 7 years and automatically renews for successive one-year periods unless the Company or Shopify provides written notice of non-renewal. In connection with the collaboration agreement, the Company entered into 3 separate agreements including a revenue sharing agreement, common stock warrant agreement, and stock purchase agreement.

Under the revenue sharing agreement, the Company will make payments to Shopify in exchange for marketing services received under the collaboration agreement, which are comprised of payments for the Shopify Core Revenue Share and payments for the Shopify Plus Integration Fee. These payments are calculated as follows:

•Shopify Core Revenue Share: For all revenue generated through the use of the Company’s email and text messaging and WhatsApp messaging marketing applications by Shopify merchants designated as “Shopify Core Merchants” in respect of leads attributed to Shopify, the Company is obligated to pay Shopify a percentage of such revenues or the amounts owed to Shopify under the terms of Shopify’s standard partnership agreements applicable to all Shopify partners, which is 15% of any revenues exceeding a $1 million threshold.

•Shopify Plus Integration Fee: On a monthly basis, the Company is required to pay Shopify a fee (“Shopify Plus Integration Fee” or “Integration Fee”), subject to an annual increase at Shopify’s election (up to a maximum increase of not more than a percentage calculated through a formula provided in the revenue sharing agreement), with respect to each Shopify Plus Merchant where all of the following circumstances apply: (a) the Shopify Plus Merchant was on Shopify’s Plus program at the end of the relevant month; (b) one or more of the Shopify Plus Merchant’s covered stores has the Company’s application installed at both the beginning and at the end of the relevant month; and (c) the Company’s application received a webhook request and/or made any Application Programming Interface calls against one or more of the Shopify Plus Merchant’s covered stores in the relevant month (i.e., the Company’s application is integrated with the Shopify platform and data is flowing between them).

The Company determined that Shopify is a vendor and not a customer, as the collaboration agreement is a services contract under which the Company is receiving marketing services from Shopify in exchange for payments under the revenue sharing agreement. The revenue sharing agreement is a mechanism for Shopify to be compensated for the customer acquisition and marketing services Shopify is providing to the Company. Shopify is not a reseller or distributor of the Company’s platform, nor does Shopify provide any services on the Company’s behalf. During the years ended December 31, 2025, 2024, and 2023, the Company incurred $33.2 million, $27.4 million, and $21.9 million, respectively, related to fees paid under the revenue sharing agreement. As of December 31, 2025 and 2024, the Company had $3.0 million and $2.6 million, respectively, in accrued expenses owed to Shopify for fees payable under the revenue sharing agreement. As of December 31, 2025 and 2024, the Company had $3.0 million and $2.5 million, respectively, in accounts payable owed to Shopify for fees payable under the revenue sharing agreement.

As consideration for the collaboration agreement, the Company also issued warrants that allow Shopify to purchase up to 15,743,174 shares of common stock at a price of $0.01 per share, of which 25% of the warrants vested on the grant date on July 28, 2022, and the remaining 75% of the warrants vest quarterly over the remaining 5 year period. The aggregate grant date fair value of the warrants was $370.3 million and is being capitalized to prepaid marketing expense as the warrants vest. The prepaid marketing expense asset is amortized into selling and marketing expense on a straight-line basis over the expected benefit period, which is the 7 year term of the collaboration agreement.

Pursuant to the common stock warrant agreement, upon the Company’s initial public offering (“IPO”) in September 2023, an additional 25% of the total number of warrants were accelerated, and the remaining unvested portion vests quarterly over the remaining term. Specifically, the vesting associated with 3,935,793 of the outstanding warrants was accelerated, resulting in an increase to prepaid marketing expense of $92.6 million. During the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, the Company capitalized prepaid marketing expense of $32.4 million and $32.4 million, respectively, related to vested warrants. For the years ended December 31, 2025, 2024 and 2023, the Company recorded marketing expense of $52.9 million, $52.9 million and $52.9 million, respectively, in the Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss as a component of selling and marketing expense related to the amortization of the prepaid marketing expense. As of December 31, 2025 and 2024, the Company’s prepaid marketing expense was $132.8 million and $153.3 million, respectively. As of December 31, 2025, there was $189.5 million of unrecognized marketing expense

On June 24, 2022, the Company entered into a stock purchase agreement with Shopify. On the closing date of July 28, 2022, Shopify purchased 2,951,846 shares of common stock for $33.88 per share. The stock purchase agreement gives Shopify the right to purchase 15,743,174 additional shares of common stock for $88.93 per share (the “Investment Option”). The common stock and Investment Option were determined to be freestanding financial instruments purchased at fair value and were accounted for separately from the collaboration agreement, revenue sharing agreement, and common stock warrant agreement. Refer to Note 11. Redeemable Common Stock, Common Stock, and Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit) for further discussion of the common stock purchase and Investment Option.

Research and development costs are expensed as incurred, unless they qualify as capitalized internal-use software development costs. Research and development costs consist primarily of personnel-related expenses associated with the Company’s research and development staff, including payroll, benefits, bonuses, and stock-based compensation.

Advertising costs are expensed as incurred. During the years ended December 31, 2025, 2024 and 2023, the Company incurred advertising expenses, which are included within selling and marketing expenses in the Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss, in the amount of $51.8 million, $45.9 million, and $41.6 million, respectively.

The Company measures stock-based compensation awards, including stock options and restricted stock units (“RSUs”), based on the estimated fair value of the awards on the date of grant. Stock-based compensation expense is recorded for awards issued to employees and non-employees at fair value with a corresponding increase in additional paid-in capital. For awards with service-based vesting conditions only, the Company recognizes compensation expense on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period of the award. Forfeitures are recognized when they occur.

RSUs granted under the Company’s 2015 Stock Incentive Plan (the “2015 Plan”) are subject to both service-based and performance-based vesting conditions, whereby the performance condition is satisfied upon occurrence of a liquidity event. Upon the effectiveness of the Company’s registration statement on Form S-1 filed with the SEC in connection with its IPO in September 2023, the performance condition was satisfied and cumulative compensation cost was recognized using the accelerated attribution method. Compensation costs continue to be recognized under this method as the RSUs vest over the remaining service period. Generally, 2015 Plan awards vest or are exercisable into shares of Series B common stock and are immediately reclassified to shares of Series A common stock based upon the employee’s conversion election made at the time of the Company’s IPO. The fair value of each RSU grant is calculated based on the estimated fair value of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant, or, if modified, the date of modification.

RSUs granted under the Company’s 2023 Stock Option and Incentive Plan (the “2023 Plan”) are for shares of Series A common stock and are subject to service-based vesting conditions only. Compensation costs related to these awards are recognized using the straight-line method over the service period of the award. The fair value of each RSU grant is calculated based on the fair value of the Company’s Series A common stock on the date of grant, or, if modified, the date of modification.

Rights granted to employees to purchase shares of Series A common stock under the Company’s 2023 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the “ESPP”) are subject to service-based vesting conditions only. Compensation costs related to the ESPP are recognized using the straight-line method over the service period of the award. The fair value of the estimated shares of Series A common stock to be purchased is computed as the sum of (a) 15% purchase discount off the grant date quoted trading price of the Company’s Series A common stock and (b) the fair value of the look-back feature of the Company’s Series A common stock on the grant date, which consists of a call option on 85% of a share of Series A common stock and a put option on 15% of a share of Series A common stock.

Redeemable common stock represents shares of the Company’s common stock that were redeemable at the option of the investor after a specified date. The initial carrying amount of redeemable common stock is equal to the respective issuance date fair value of the common stock subject to redemption, less issuance costs. The carrying amount was adjusted to equal the redemption value, which was equal to the fair value of a single share of common stock at the end of each reporting period. The carrying amount was subject to a floor equal to the initial carrying amount. The resulting changes in the redemption value were recorded with corresponding adjustments against retained earnings, if available, additional paid-in capital or accumulated deficit. Redeemable common stock was originally classified outside of permanent equity on the Consolidated Balance Sheets as the redemption option was outside of the Company’s control. As the redemption feature applicable to certain shares of the Company’s common stock was terminated upon the Company’s IPO, all shares of the Company’s redeemable common stock converted into 64,046,223 shares of Series B common stock upon the effectiveness of the Company’s registration statement on Form S-1 filed with the SEC on September 19, 2023. Refer to Note 11. Redeemable Common Stock, Common Stock, and Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit) for further discussion.

The Company accounts for income taxes in accordance with ASC 740, Income Taxes (“ASC 740”), which utilizes the asset and liability method for the financial accounting and reporting of income taxes. Under this method, deferred income taxes are recognized for the expected future tax consequences of differences between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and their reported amounts in the financial statements. The amount of any future tax benefit associated with deferred tax assets is reduced by a valuation allowance when there is uncertainty that those tax benefits will be realized.

The Company accounts for uncertain tax positions using a more-likely-than-not recognition threshold in accordance with ASC 740. The evaluation of uncertain tax positions is based on factors including, but not limited to, changes in tax law, the measurement of tax positions taken or expected to be taken in tax returns, the effective settlement of matters subject to audit, new audit activity, and changes in facts or circumstances related to a tax position. Interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions are included as a component of income tax expense.

Accounts receivable are shown net of an allowance for doubtful accounts of $2.3 million and $1.0 million as of December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively. The allowance for doubtful accounts is established to represent the Company’s best estimate of the net realizable value of the outstanding amount of receivables that it will be unable to collect. The development of the Company’s allowance for doubtful accounts is based on a review of factors such as the customer’s payment history, historical loss patterns, the general economic climate, age, and past due status of invoices. If circumstances relating to specific customers change or unanticipated changes occur in the general business environment, the Company’s estimates of the recoverability of receivables could be further adjusted.

Accounts receivable is shown inclusive of unbilled accounts receivable of $3.3 million and $1.7 million as of December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively. Unbilled accounts receivable is made up entirely of overages incurred by customers who have exceeded their subscription allotments as of the period end but are not yet due for their period end billing.

The Company considers all highly liquid investments with a remaining maturity of three months or less at the time of purchase to be cash equivalents. As of December 31, 2025 and 2024, the Company had cash equivalents of $325.9 million and $278.2 million, respectively, in money market funds.

As of December 31, 2025 and 2024, the Company had a current restricted cash balance of $0.7 million and $0.4 million, respectively. As of December 31, 2024, the Company had a non-current restricted cash balance of $0.7 million. The Company had no non-current restricted cash as of December 31, 2025. Restricted cash at December 31, 2025 and 2024 related to the Company’s required collateral to fund payroll and credit card obligations in its Australian entity, as well as collateral required to be held as a result of the Company’s office lease in Australia. Restricted cash is included in current assets for obligations that expire within one year and is included in non-current assets for obligations that expire more than one year from the balance sheet date.

Credit risk with respect to accounts receivable is dispersed due to the Company’s large number of customers. The Company routinely assesses the creditworthiness of its customers. The Company does not require collateral. The Company maintains an allowance for potentially uncollectible accounts receivable. Accounts receivable is stated at the amount management expects to collect from outstanding balances. Due to these factors, no additional credit risk beyond amounts provided for collection losses is believed by management to be probable in the Company’s accounts receivable.

Significant concentrations of credit risk exist when a customer represents 10% or more of accounts receivable. As of December 31, 2025 and 2024, no individual customer accounted for 10% or more of accounts receivable. Additionally, there were no customers that represented 10% or more of the Company’s revenue for the years ended December 31, 2025, 2024, and 2023.

The Company had certain vendors who individually represented 10% or more of the Company’s total vendor expenditures. For the year ended December 31, 2025, three vendors represented 18%, 14%, and 13% of total vendor expenditures. For the year ended December 31, 2024, three vendors represented 17%, 16%, and 12% of total vendor expenditures. For the year ended December 31, 2023, three vendors represented 19%, 14%, and 12% of total vendor expenditures.

Property and equipment are recorded at cost and depreciated over the estimated useful lives of the related assets using the straight-line method. Upon retirement or sale, the cost of assets disposed of and the related accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts, and any resulting gain or loss is included in the determination of net income or loss in the period of disposal. Expenditures for maintenance and repairs are charged to expense as incurred, whereas major improvements are capitalized as additions to property and equipment. The estimated useful lives of the Company’s property and equipment are as follows:

As part of the build out of the Company’s headquarters in Boston, Massachusetts, the Company built an internal staircase connecting multiple floors. This staircase required the removal of ground space to connect the floors. The lease agreement required the Company to incur the costs required to restore the leased space to its original condition. During fiscal year 2020, on the lease commencement date, the Company established an ARO based on the present value of contractually required estimated future costs to retire long-lived assets at the termination or expiration of the lease and to return the space to its original condition. The asset associated with the ARO is amortized over the lease term or 5 years to operating expense, and the ARO is accreted to the end of lease obligation value over the same term. On January 31, 2025, the Company amended the lease agreement for its Boston corporate headquarters and, under the terms of the amendment, the Company was relieved of the obligation to return the space to its original condition. During the year ended December 31, 2025, the Company derecognized the ARO. The ARO activity is described in more detail in Note 5. Property and Equipment, Net.

The Company capitalizes qualifying costs incurred during the application development stage in connection with the development of internal-use software, which are included on the Consolidated Balance Sheets as a component of property and equipment, net. Costs related to preliminary project activities and post-implementation stages of software development are expensed as incurred.

Costs capitalized as internal-use software development costs include eligible salaries, stock-based compensation, and other compensation-related costs of employees incurred in developing new features and enhancements when the costs will result in additional functionality. Capitalized internal-use software development costs are amortized on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful life of 3 years. Computer software development costs that do not qualify for capitalization are expensed as incurred.

Capitalization begins when the preliminary project stage is complete, management authorizes and commits to the funding of the software project with appropriate authority, it is probable the project will be completed, the software will be used to perform the functions intended, and certain functional and quality standards have been met.

The Company determines whether an arrangement contains a lease at inception. At the commencement date, the Company will perform the classification tests to determine whether its leases are operating or financing and recognize the related lease liability and right-of-use (“ROU”) asset. The Company, as the lessee, recognizes on the Consolidated Balance Sheets a liability to make lease payments and an ROU asset representing the right to use the underlying asset for both finance and operating leases with a lease term longer than twelve months. Lease liabilities and their corresponding ROU assets are recognized based on the present value of unpaid lease payments over the expected lease term.

The Company has elected the following practical expedients: (1) not to separate lease and non-lease components for all asset classes and (2) not to recognize leases with a term of 12 months or less at commencement on the Consolidated Balance Sheets for all asset classes. If there is a change in the Company’s assessment of the lease term and, as a result, the remaining lease term extends more than 12 months from the end of the previously determined lease term, the lease no longer meets the definition of a short-term lease and is accounted for as either an operating or finance lease and recognized on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

The Company leases office space and office equipment under non-cancelable operating leases ranging from 1 to 8 years. Certain leases include options to extend the leases for up to 10 years. These options will be included in the lease term when they are reasonably certain to be exercised. The Company’s leases generally do not include options to terminate the leases or to purchase the underlying asset.

The Company’s leases are primarily fixed payments. Certain of the Company’s leases include variable lease payments, generally related to the lessor’s operating costs associated with the underlying asset, which are expensed as incurred. The Company’s leases generally do not contain residual value guarantees.

As most of the Company’s leases do not provide an implicit rate, the Company uses its incremental borrowing rate (“IBR”) to calculate the present value of future minimum lease payments, which is the estimated rate the Company would be required to pay for fully collateralized borrowing over the period similar to lease terms. Lease expense for minimum lease payments is recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term.

The functional currency of the Company’s foreign subsidiaries is the U.S. dollar (“USD”). In certain instances, the Company enters into transactions that are denominated in a currency other than the USD. At the date that such transaction is recognized, each asset, liability, revenue, expense, gain, or loss arising from the transaction is measured and recorded in USD using the exchange rate in effect at that date. At each balance sheet date, recorded monetary balances denominated in a currency other than the USD are adjusted to USD using the exchange rate at the balance sheet date, with gains or losses recognized in other, net in the Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss. Foreign currency translation gains and losses were immaterial for the periods presented. The Company recognized a $1.6 million foreign currency transaction loss and an immaterial foreign currency transaction loss for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2023, respectively. Foreign currency transaction gains were $1.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2024.

Certain assets and liabilities are carried at fair value in accordance with ASC 820, Fair Value Measurement (“ASC 820”). Fair value is defined as the price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. The guidance establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs used to measure fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1 measurements) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3 measurements). The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are as follows:

•Level 2 – Observable inputs (other than level 1 quoted prices), such as quoted prices in active markets for similar assets or liabilities, quoted prices in markets that are not active for identical or similar assets or liabilities, or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data.

To the extent the valuation is based on models or inputs that are less observable or unobservable in the market, the determination of fair value requires more judgment. Accordingly, the degree of judgment exercised by the Company in determining fair value is greatest for instruments categorized in Level 3. A financial instrument’s level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of any input that is significant to the fair value measurement.

Certain non-financial assets, such as intangible assets, right of use assets, and property and equipment, are measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis and are adjusted to fair value only if an impairment charge is recognized. Such fair value measures are considered to be within the Level 3 valuation hierarchy due to the subjective nature of the unobservable inputs used. The Company has not recorded any impairment charges during any of the periods presented.

Diluted net loss per share attributable to Series A and Series B common stockholders is computed in the same manner as basic net loss per share, as the inclusion of all potentially dilutive securities outstanding would be antidilutive. See Note 13. Loss Per Share for further information.

The Company periodically evaluates all long-lived assets or asset groups for impairment. Long-lived assets are evaluated for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of an asset or asset group may not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by comparing the carrying amount of an asset or asset group to the estimated undiscounted future net cash flows expected to be generated by the asset or the asset group. If the carrying amount of an asset or asset group exceeds its estimated undiscounted future net cash flows, an impairment charge is recognized by the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset or asset group exceeds the fair value of the asset. There was no impairment recorded during the years ended December 31, 2025, 2024, and 2023.

In December 2023, the FASB issued ASU No. 2023-09, Income Taxes (Topic 740): Improvements to Income Tax Disclosures, which requires public entities, on an annual basis, to provide disclosure of specific categories in the rate reconciliation, as well as disclosure of income taxes paid disaggregated by jurisdiction. ASU 2023-09 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2024, with early adoption permitted. The Company adopted ASU 2023-09 on its consolidated financial statements in the current period on a prospective basis. See Note 9. Income Taxes for the related disclosures.

In November 2024, the FASB issued ASU No. 2024-03, Disaggregation of Income Statement Expenses. The new guidance requires additional disclosure related to the disaggregation of income statement expense categories. ASU 2024-03 is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2026 and interim periods within fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2027, with early adoption permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting ASU 2024-03 on its consolidated financial statements.

In September 2025, the FASB issued ASU No. 2025-06, Targeted Improvements to the Accounting for Internal-Use Software. The new guidance amends certain aspects of the accounting for and disclosure of software costs under ASC 350-40. ASU 2025-06 is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2027, with early adoption permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting ASU 2025-06 on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.

In December 2025, the FASB issued ASU No. 2025-11, Interim Reporting (Topic 270): Narrow-Scope Improvements. The new guidance is intended to improve the navigability of the guidance in ASC 270 and clarify when it applies. ASU 2025-11 is effective for interim periods beginning after December 15, 2027, with early adoption permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting ASU 2025-11 on its interim condensed consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.