EX-99.05 14 a2016oge10-kxex9905.htm EXHIBIT 99.05
Exhibit 99.05
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors of Enable GP, LLC and
Unitholders of Enable Midstream Partners, LP
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Enable Midstream Partners, LP and subsidiaries (the "Partnership") as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, cash flows, and partners’ equity for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2016. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Enable Midstream Partners, LP and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2016, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Houston, Texas
February 21, 2017
1

Exhibit 99.05
ENABLE MIDSTREAM PARTNERS, LP
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

| Year Ended December 31,
| 2016 |  | 2015 |  | 2014
| (In millions, except per unit data)
Revenues (including revenues from affiliates (Note 14)): |  |  |  |  |
Product sales | $ | 1,172 |  |  | $ | 1,334 |  |  | $ | 2,300 |
Service revenue | 1,100 |  |  | 1,084 |  |  | 1,067 |
Total Revenues | 2,272 |  |  | 2,418 |  |  | 3,367 |
Cost and Expenses (including expenses from affiliates (Note 14)): |  |  |  |  |
Cost of natural gas and natural gas liquids (excluding depreciation and amortization shown separately) | 1,017 |  |  | 1,097 |  |  | 1,914 |
Operation and maintenance | 367 |  |  | 419 |  |  | 420 |
General and administrative | 98 |  |  | 103 |  |  | 107 |
Depreciation and amortization | 338 |  |  | 318 |  |  | 276 |
Impairments (Note 8, Note 11) | 9 |  |  | 1,134 |  |  | 8 |
Taxes other than income taxes | 58 |  |  | 59 |  |  | 56 |
Total Cost and Expenses | 1,887 |  |  | 3,130 |  |  | 2,781 |
Operating (Loss) Income | 385 |  |  | (712 | ) |  | 586 |
Other Income (Expense): |  |  |  |  |
Interest expense (including expenses from affiliates (Note 14)) | (99 | ) |  | (90 | ) |  | (70 | )
Equity in earnings of equity method affiliate | 28 |  |  | 29 |  |  | 20 |
Other, net | — |  |  | 2 |  |  | (1 | )
Total Other Income (Expense) | (71 | ) |  | (59 | ) |  | (51 | )
Income (Loss) Before Income Taxes | 314 |  |  | (771 | ) |  | 535 |
Income tax expense | 1 |  |  | — |  |  | 2 |
Net Income (Loss) | $ | 313 |  |  | $ | (771 | ) |  | $ | 533 |
Less: Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interest | 1 |  |  | (19 | ) |  | 3 |
Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Limited Partners | $ | 312 |  |  | $ | (752 | ) |  | $ | 530 |
Less: Series A Preferred Unit distributions (Note 5) | 22 |  |  | — |  |  | — |
Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Common and Subordinated Units (Note 4) | $ | 290 |  |  | (752 | ) |  | $ | 530 |
Basic earnings (loss) per unit (Note 4) |  |  |  |  |
Common units | $ | 0.69 |  |  | $ | (1.78 | ) |  | $ | 1.29 |
Subordinated units | $ | 0.68 |  |  | $ | (1.78 | ) |  | $ | 1.28 |
Diluted earnings (loss) per unit (Note 4) |  |  |  |  |
Common units | $ | 0.69 |  |  | $ | (1.78 | ) |  | $ | 1.29 |
Subordinated units | $ | 0.68 |  |  | $ | (1.78 | ) |  | $ | 1.28 |

See Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
3

Exhibit 99.05
ENABLE MIDSTREAM PARTNERS, LP
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

| Year Ended December 31,
| 2016 |  | 2015 |  | 2014
| (In millions)
Net Income (Loss) | $ | 313 |  |  | $ | (771 | ) |  | $ | 533 |
Comprehensive Income (Loss) | 313 |  |  | (771 | ) |  | 533 |
Less: Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interest | 1 |  |  | (19 | ) |  | 3 |
Comprehensive Income (Loss) Attributable to Enable Midstream Partners, LP | $ | 312 |  |  | $ | (752 | ) |  | $ | 530 |

See Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
4

Exhibit 99.05
ENABLE MIDSTREAM PARTNERS, LP
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

| December 31,
| 2016 |  | 2015
| (In millions, except units)
Current Assets: |
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 6 |  |  | $ | 4 |
Restricted cash | 17 |  |  | — |
Accounts receivable, net | 249 |  |  | 245 |
Accounts receivable—affiliated companies | 13 |  |  | 21 |
Inventory | 41 |  |  | 53 |
Gas imbalances | 41 |  |  | 23 |
Other current assets | 29 |  |  | 35 |
Total current assets | 396 |  |  | 381 |
Property, Plant and Equipment: |  |  |
Property, plant and equipment | 11,567 |  |  | 11,293 |
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization | 1,424 |  |  | 1,162 |
Property, plant and equipment, net | 10,143 |  |  | 10,131 |
Other Assets: |  |  |
Intangible assets, net | 306 |  |  | 333 |
Investment in equity method affiliate | 329 |  |  | 344 |
Other | 38 |  |  | 37 |
Total other assets | 673 |  |  | 714 |
Total Assets | $ | 11,212 |  |  | $ | 11,226 |
Current Liabilities: |  |  |
Accounts payable | $ | 181 |  |  | $ | 248 |
Accounts payable—affiliated companies | 3 |  |  | 9 |
Short-term debt | — |  |  | 236 |
Taxes accrued | 30 |  |  | 30 |
Gas imbalances | 35 |  |  | 25 |
Accrued compensation | 37 |  |  | 23 |
Customer deposits | 31 |  |  | 18 |
Other | 45 |  |  | 26 |
Total current liabilities | 362 |  |  | 615 |
Other Liabilities: |  |  |
Accumulated deferred income taxes, net | 10 |  |  | 8 |
Notes payable—affiliated companies | — |  |  | 363 |
Regulatory liabilities | 19 |  |  | 18 |
Other | 34 |  |  | 20 |
Total other liabilities | 63 |  |  | 409 |
Long-Term Debt | 2,993 |  |  | 2,671 |
Commitments and Contingencies (Note 15) |  |  |
Partners’ Equity: |  |  |
Series A Preferred Units (14,520,000 issued and outstanding at December 31, 2016 and 0 issued and outstanding at December 31, 2015) | 362 |  |  | — |
Common units (224,535,454 issued and outstanding at December 31, 2016 and 214,541,422 issued and outstanding at December 31, 2015, respectively) | 3,737 |  |  | 3,714 |
Subordinated units (207,855,430 issued and outstanding at December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively) | 3,683 |  |  | 3,805 |
Noncontrolling interest | 12 |  |  | 12 |
Total Partners’ Equity | 7,794 |  |  | 7,531 |
Total Liabilities and Partners’ Equity | $ | 11,212 |  |  | $ | 11,226 |

See Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
5

Exhibit 99.05
ENABLE MIDSTREAM PARTNERS, LP
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

| Year Ended December 31,
| 2016 |  | 2015 |  | 2014
| (In millions)
Cash Flows from Operating Activities: |  |  |
Net income (loss) | $ | 313 |  |  | $ | (771 | ) |  | $ | 533 |
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities: |  |  |  |  |
Depreciation and amortization | 338 |  |  | 318 |  |  | 276 |
Deferred income taxes | 2 |  |  | (1 | ) |  | 1 |
Impairments | 9 |  |  | 1,134 |  |  | 8 |
Loss on sale/retirement of assets | 17 |  |  | 5 |  |  | — |
Equity in earnings of equity method affiliate, net of distributions | — |  |  | 5 |  |  | 3 |
Equity based compensation | 13 |  |  | 9 |  |  | 13 |
Amortization of debt expense and discount (premium) | (3 | ) |  | (2 | ) |  | (1 | )
Changes in other assets and liabilities: |  |  |  |  |
Accounts receivable, net | (4 | ) |  | 9 |  |  | 52 |
Accounts receivable—affiliated companies | 8 |  |  | 6 |  |  | 1 |
Inventory | 12 |  |  | 10 |  |  | 7 |
Gas imbalance assets | (18 | ) |  | 22 |  |  | (35 | )
Other current assets | 6 |  |  | 2 |  |  | 17 |
Other assets | (1 | ) |  | (4 | ) |  | 5 |
Accounts payable | (34 | ) |  | — |  |  | (138 | )
Accounts payable—affiliated companies | (6 | ) |  | (29 | ) |  | (2 | )
Gas imbalance liabilities | 10 |  |  | 12 |  |  | — |
Other current liabilities | 45 |  |  | 6 |  |  | 29 |
Other liabilities | 14 |  |  | (5 | ) |  | — |
Net cash provided by operating activities | 721 |  |  | 726 |  |  | 769 |
Cash Flows from Investing Activities: |  |  |  |  |
Capital expenditures | (383 | ) |  | (869 | ) |  | (837 | )
Acquisitions, net of cash acquired | — |  |  | (80 | ) |  | — |
Proceeds from sale of assets | 1 |  |  | 3 |  |  | 13 |
Return of investment in equity method affiliate | 15 |  |  | 8 |  |  | 198 |
Investment in equity method affiliate | — |  |  | (8 | ) |  | (189 | )
Net cash used in investing activities | (367 | ) |  | (946 | ) |  | (815 | )
Cash Flows from Financing Activities: |  |  |  |  |
Repayment of long term debt | — |  |  | — |  |  | (1,500 | )
Proceeds from long term debt, net of issuance costs | — |  |  | 450 |  |  | 1,635 |
Proceeds from revolving credit facility | 1,734 |  |  | 585 |  |  | 122 |
Repayment of revolving credit facility | (1,408 | ) |  | (275 | ) |  | (495 | )
Increase (decrease) in short-term debt | (236 | ) |  | (17 | ) |  | 253 |
Repayment of notes payable—affiliated companies | (363 | ) |  | — |  |  | — |
Proceeds from issuance of common units | 137 |  |  | — |  |  | 464 |
Proceeds from issuance of Series A Preferred Units, net of issuance costs | 362 |  |  | — |  |  | — |
Distributions | (561 | ) |  | (531 | ) |  | (529 | )
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities | (335 | ) |  | 212 |  |  | (50 | )
Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash, Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash | 19 |  |  | (8 | ) |  | (96 | )
Cash, Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash at Beginning of Period | 4 |  |  | 12 |  |  | 108 |
Cash, Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash at End of Period | $ | 23 |  |  | $ | 4 |  |  | $ | 12 |

See Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
6

Exhibit 99.05
ENABLE MIDSTREAM PARTNERS, LP
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF PARTNERS’ EQUITY

| Series A Preferred Units |  | Common Units |  | Subordinated Units |  | Noncontrolling Interest |  | Total Partners’ Equity
| Units |  | Value |  | Units |  | Value |  | Units |  | Value |  | Value |  | Value
| (In millions) |  |  |
Balance as of December 31, 2013 | — |  |  | $ | — |  |  | 390 |  |  | $ | 8,148 |  |  | — |  |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | 33 |  |  | $ | 8,181 |
Conversion to subordinated units | — |  |  | — |  |  | (208 | ) |  | (4,372 | ) |  | 208 |  |  | 4,372 |  |  | — |  |  | — |
Net income | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 349 |  |  | — |  |  | 181 |  |  | 3 |  |  | 533 |
Issuance of IPO common units | — |  |  | — |  |  | 25 |  |  | 464 |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 464 |
Issuance of common units upon interest acquisition of SESH | — |  |  | — |  |  | 6 |  |  | 161 |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 161 |
Distributions | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | (410 | ) |  | — |  |  | (114 | ) |  | (5 | ) |  | (529 | )
Equity based compensation, net of units for employee taxes | — |  |  | — |  |  | 1 |  |  | 13 |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 13 |
Balance as of December 31, 2014 | — |  |  | $ | — |  |  | 214 |  |  | $ | 4,353 |  |  | 208 |  |  | $ | 4,439 |  |  | $ | 31 |  |  | $ | 8,823 |
Net loss | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | (379 | ) |  | — |  |  | (373 | ) |  | (19 | ) |  | (771 | )
Issuance of common units upon interest acquisition of SESH | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 1 |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 1 |
Distributions | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | (270 | ) |  | — |  |  | (261 | ) |  | — |  |  | (531 | )
Equity based compensation, net of units for employee taxes | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 9 |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 9 |
Balance as of December 31, 2015 | — |  |  | $ | — |  |  | 214 |  |  | $ | 3,714 |  |  | 208 |  |  | $ | 3,805 |  |  | $ | 12 |  |  | $ | 7,531 |
Net income | — |  |  | 22 |  |  | — |  |  | 147 |  |  | — |  |  | 143 |  |  | 1 |  |  | 313 |
Issuance of Series A Preferred Units | 15 |  |  | 362 |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 362 |
Issuance of common units | — |  |  | — |  |  | 10 |  |  | 137 |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 137 |
Distributions | — |  |  | (22 | ) |  | — |  |  | (274 | ) |  | — |  |  | (265 | ) |  | (1 | ) |  | (562 | )
Equity based compensation, net of units for employee taxes | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 13 |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 13 |
Balance as of December 31, 2016 | 15 |  |  | $ | 362 |  |  | 224 |  |  | $ | 3,737 |  |  | 208 |  |  | $ | 3,683 |  |  | $ | 12 |  |  | $ | 7,794 |

See Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
7

Exhibit 99.05
ENABLE MIDSTREAM PARTNERS, LP
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(1) Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Organization
Enable Midstream Partners, LP (Partnership) is a Delaware limited partnership formed on May 1, 2013 by CenterPoint Energy, OGE Energy and ArcLight, pursuant to the terms of the MFA. The Partnership’s assets and operations are organized into two reportable segments: (i) gathering and processing and (ii) transportation and storage. The gathering and processing segment primarily provides natural gas and crude oil gathering and natural gas processing services to our producer customers. The transportation and storage segment provides interstate and intrastate natural gas pipeline transportation and storage services primarily to our producer, power plant, LDC and industrial end-user customers. The Partnership’s natural gas gathering and processing assets are primarily located in Oklahoma, Texas, Arkansas and Louisiana and serve natural gas production in the Anadarko, Arkoma and Ark-La-Tex Basins. Crude oil gathering assets are located in North Dakota and serve crude oil production in the Bakken Shale formation of the Williston Basin. The Partnership’s natural gas transportation and storage assets consist primarily of an interstate pipeline system extending from western Oklahoma and the Texas Panhandle to Louisiana, an interstate pipeline system extending from Louisiana to Illinois, an intrastate pipeline system in Oklahoma, and our investment in SESH, a pipeline extending from Louisiana to Alabama.
CenterPoint Energy and OGE Energy each have 50% of the management interests in Enable GP. Enable GP is the general partner of the Partnership and has no other operating activities. Enable GP is governed by a board made up of two representatives designated by each of CenterPoint Energy and OGE Energy, along with the Partnership’s Chief Executive Officer and three independent board members CenterPoint Energy and OGE Energy mutually agreed to appoint. CenterPoint Energy and OGE Energy also own a 40% and 60% interest, respectively, in the incentive distribution rights held by Enable GP.
At December 31, 2016, CenterPoint Energy held approximately 54.1% of the Partnership’s common and subordinated units, or 94,151,707 common units and 139,704,916 subordinated units, and OGE Energy held approximately 25.7% of the Partnership’s common and subordinated units, or 42,832,291 common units and 68,150,514 subordinated units. Additionally, CenterPoint Energy holds 14,520,000 Series A Preferred Units. The limited partner interests of the Partnership have limited voting rights on matters affecting the business. As such, limited partners do not have rights to elect the Partnership’s General Partner (Enable GP) on an annual or continuing basis and may not remove Enable GP without at least a 75% vote by all unitholders, including all units held by the Partnership’s limited partners, and Enable GP and its affiliates, voting together as a single class.
For the period from December 31, 2013 through May 29, 2014, the financial statements reflect a 24.95% interest in SESH. For the period of May 30, 2014 through June 29, 2015, the financial statements reflect a 49.90% interest in SESH. On June 12, 2015, CenterPoint Energy exercised its put right with respect to a 0.1% interest in SESH. Pursuant to the put right, on June 30, 2015, CenterPoint Energy contributed its remaining 0.1% interest in SESH to the Partnership in exchange for 25,341 common units. As of December 31, 2016, the Partnership owned a 50% interest in SESH. See Note 9 for further discussion of SESH.
In addition, for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, the Partnership held a 50% ownership interest in Atoka and consolidated Atoka in its Consolidated Financial Statements as EOIT acted as the managing member of Atoka and had control over the operations of Atoka.
On April 16, 2014, the Partnership completed the IPO of 25,000,000 common units at a price to the public of $20.00 per common unit. The Partnership received net proceeds of $464 million from the sale of the common units, after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions, the structuring fee and offering expenses. In connection with the IPO, underwriters exercised their option to purchase 3,750,000 additional common units, which were fulfilled with units held by ArcLight. As a result, the Partnership did not receive any proceeds from the sale of common units pursuant to the exercise of the underwriters’ option to purchase additional common units. The exercise of the underwriters’ option to purchase additional common units did not affect the total number of units outstanding or the amount of cash needed to pay the minimum quarterly distribution on all outstanding units. The Partnership retained the net proceeds of the IPO for general partnership purposes, including the funding of expansion capital expenditures, and to pre-fund demand fees expected to be incurred over the next three years relating to certain expiring transportation and storage contracts. In connection with the IPO, 139,704,916 of CenterPoint Energy’s common units and 68,150,514 of OGE Energy’s common units were converted into subordinated units.
8

Exhibit 99.05
Basis of Presentation
The accompanying consolidated financial statements and related notes of the Partnership have been prepared pursuant to the rules and regulations of the SEC and GAAP.
For a description of the Partnership’s reportable segments, see Note 18.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Revenue Recognition
The Partnership generates the majority of its revenues from midstream energy services, including natural gas gathering, processing, transportation and storage and crude oil gathering. The Partnership performs these services under various contractual arrangements, which include fee-based contract arrangements and arrangements pursuant to which it purchases and resells commodities in connection with providing the related service and earns a net margin for its fee. While the Partnership’s transactions vary in form, the essential element of each transaction is the use of its assets to transport a product or provide a processed product to a customer. The Partnership reflects revenue as Product sales and Service revenue on the Consolidated Statements of Income as follows:
Product sales: Product sales represent the sale of natural gas, NGLs, crude oil and condensate where the product is purchased and used in connection with providing the Partnership’s midstream services.
Service revenue: Service revenue represents all other revenue generated as a result of performing the Partnership’s midstream services.
Revenues for gathering, processing, transportation and storage services for the Partnership are recorded each month based on the current month’s estimated volumes, contracted prices (considering current commodity prices), historical seasonal fluctuations and any known adjustments. The estimates are reversed in the following month and customers are billed on actual volumes and contracted prices. Gas sales are calculated on current-month nominations and contracted prices. Revenues associated with the production of NGLs are estimated based on current-month estimated production and contracted prices. These amounts are reversed in the following month and the customers are billed on actual production and contracted prices. Estimated revenues are reflected in Accounts receivable, net or Accounts receivable—affiliated companies, as appropriate, on the Consolidated Balance Sheets and in Revenues on the Consolidated Statements of Income.
The Partnership recognizes revenue from natural gas gathering, processing, transportation and storage and crude oil gathering services to third parties as services are provided. Revenue associated with NGLs is recognized when the production is sold. The Partnership records deferred revenue when it receives consideration from a third party before achieving certain criteria that must be met for revenue to be recognized in accordance with GAAP. The Partnership had $34 million and $30 million of deferred revenues, including deferred revenue—affiliated companies, on the Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.
The Partnership relies on certain key natural gas producer customers for a significant portion of natural gas and NGLs supply. The Partnership relies on certain key utilities for a significant portion of transportation and storage demand. The Partnership depends on third-party facilities to transport and fractionate NGLs that it delivers to third parties at the inlet of their facilities. Additionally, for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, one third party purchased approximately 22%, 18% and 21%, respectively, of the NGLs delivered off our system, which accounted for approximately $129 million, $108 million and $235 million, or 6%, 4% and 7%, respectively, of total revenues. Other than revenues from affiliates discussed in Note 14, there are no other revenue concentrations with individual customers in the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014.
Natural Gas and Natural Gas Liquids Purchases
Cost of natural gas and natural gas liquids represents cost of our natural gas and natural gas liquids purchased exclusive of
9

Exhibit 99.05
depreciation, Operation and maintenance and General and administrative expenses and consists primarily of product and fuel costs. Estimates for gas purchases are based on estimated volumes and contracted purchase prices. Estimated gas purchases are included in Accounts Payable or Accounts Payable-affiliated companies, as appropriate, on the Consolidated Balance Sheets and in Cost of natural gas and natural gas liquids, excluding Depreciation and amortization on the Consolidated Statements of Income.
Operation and Maintenance and General and Administrative Expense
Operation and maintenance expense represents the cost of our service related revenues and consists primarily of labor expenses, lease costs, utility costs, insurance premiums and repairs and maintenance expenses directly related with the operations of assets. General and administrative expense represents cost incurred to manage the business. This expense includes cost of general corporate services, such as treasury, accounting, legal, information technology and human resources and all other expenses necessary or appropriate to the conduct of business. Any Operation and maintenance expense and General and administrative expense associated with product sales is immaterial.
Environmental Costs
The Partnership expenses or capitalizes environmental expenditures, as appropriate, depending on their future economic benefit. The Partnership expenses amounts that relate to an existing condition caused by past operations that do not have future economic benefit. The Partnership records undiscounted liabilities related to these future costs when environmental assessments and/or remediation activities are probable and the costs can be reasonably estimated. There are no material amounts accrued at December 31, 2016 or 2015.
Depreciation and Amortization Expense
Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method based on economic lives or a regulatory-mandated recovery period. Amortization of intangible assets is computed using the straight-line method over the respective lives of the intangible assets.
The computation of depreciation expense requires judgment regarding the estimated useful lives and salvage value of assets at the time the assets are placed in service. As circumstances warrant, useful lives are adjusted when changes in planned use, changes in estimated production lives of affiliated natural gas basins or other factors indicate that a different life would be more appropriate. Such changes could materially impact future depreciation expense. Changes in useful lives that do not result in the impairment of an asset are recognized prospectively. The computation of amortization expense on intangible assets requires judgment regarding the amortization method used. Intangible assets are amortized on a straight-line basis over their useful lives using a method of amortization that reflects the pattern in which the economic benefits of the intangible asset are consumed.
Income Taxes
Upon conversion to a limited partnership on May 1, 2013, the Partnership’s earnings are no longer subject to income tax (other than Texas state margin taxes and taxes associated with the Partnership’s corporate subsidiaries, Enable Midstream Services and Enable Muskogee Intrastate Transmission) and are taxable at the individual partner level. For more information, see Note 16.
We account for deferred income taxes related to the federal and state jurisdictions using the asset and liability method. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future taxes attributable to the difference between financial statement carrying amounts of assets and liabilities and their respective tax basis. Deferred tax assets are also recognized for the future tax benefits attributable to the expected utilization of tax net operating loss carryforwards. In the event future utilization is determined to be unlikely, a valuation allowance is provided to reduce the tax benefits from such assets. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates in effect for the period in which the temporary differences and carryforwards are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect of a change in tax rates is recognized in the period which includes the enactment date. The Partnership recognizes interest and penalties as a component of income tax expense.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
The Partnership considers cash equivalents to be short-term, highly liquid investments with maturities of three months or less from the date of purchase. The Consolidated Balance Sheets have $6 million and $4 million of cash and cash equivalents as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.
10

Exhibit 99.05
Restricted Cash
Restricted cash consists of cash which is restricted by agreements with third parties. The Consolidated Balance Sheets have $17 million of restricted cash as of December 31, 2016. The Partnership had no restricted cash as of December 31, 2015.
Accounts Receivable and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
Accounts receivable are recorded at the invoiced amount and do not typically bear interest. The determination of the allowance for doubtful accounts requires management to make estimates and judgments regarding our customers’ ability to pay. The allowance for doubtful accounts is determined based upon specific identification and estimates of future uncollectable amounts. On an ongoing basis, we evaluate our customers’ financial strength based on aging of accounts receivable, payment history and review of other relevant information, including ratings agency credit ratings and alerts, publicly available reports and news releases, and bank and trade references. It is the policy of management to review the outstanding accounts receivable at least quarterly, giving consideration to historical bad debt write-offs, the aging of receivables and specific customer circumstances that may impact their ability to pay the amounts due. Based on this review, management determined that a $3 million allowance for doubtful accounts was required as of December 31, 2016, and no allowance for doubtful accounts was required as of December 31, 2015.
Inventory
Materials and supplies inventory is valued at cost and is subsequently recorded at the lower of cost or net realizable value. During the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2014, the Partnership recorded write-downs to net realizable value related to materials and supplies inventory disposed or identified as excess or obsolete of $1 million and $9 million, respectively. There were no material write-downs related to materials and supplies inventory for the year ended December 31, 2015. Materials and supplies are recorded to inventory when purchased and, as appropriate, subsequently charged to operation and maintenance expense on the Consolidated Statements of Income or capitalized to property, plant and equipment on the Consolidated Balance Sheets when installed.
Natural gas inventory is held, through the transportation and storage segment, to provide operational support for the intrastate pipeline deliveries and to manage leased intrastate storage capacity. Natural gas liquids inventory is held, through the gathering and processing segment, due to timing differences between the production of certain natural gas liquids and ultimate sale to third parties. Natural gas and natural gas liquids inventory is valued using moving average cost and is subsequently recorded at the lower of cost or net realizable value. During the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, the Partnership recorded write-downs to net realizable value related to natural gas and natural gas liquids inventory of $3 million, $13 million and $4 million, respectively. The cost of gas associated with sales of natural gas and natural gas liquids inventory is presented in Cost of natural gas and natural gas liquids, excluding depreciation and amortization on the Consolidated Statements of Income.

| December 31,
| 2016 |  | 2015
| (In millions)
Materials and supplies | $ | 30 |  |  | $ | 34 |
Natural gas and natural gas liquids inventories | 11 |  |  | 19 |
Total | $ | 41 |  |  | $ | 53 |

Gas Imbalances
Gas imbalances occur when the actual amounts of natural gas delivered from or received by the Partnership’s pipeline system differ from the amounts scheduled to be delivered or received. Imbalances are due to or due from shippers and operators and can be settled in cash or natural gas depending on contractual terms. The Partnership values all imbalances at individual, or where appropriate an average of, current market indices applicable to the Partnership’s operations, not to exceed net realizable value.
Long-Lived Assets (including Intangible Assets)
The Partnership records property, plant and equipment and intangible assets at historical cost. Newly constructed plant is added to plant balances at cost which includes contracted services, direct labor, materials, overhead, transportation costs and capitalized interest. Replacements of units of property are capitalized as plant. For assets that belong to a common plant account, the replaced plant is removed from plant balances and charged to Accumulated depreciation. For assets that do not belong to a common plant account, the replaced plant is removed from plant balances with the related accumulated depreciation and the
11

Exhibit 99.05
remaining balance net of any salvage proceeds is recorded as a loss in the Consolidated Statements of Income as Operation and maintenance expense. The Partnership expenses repair and maintenance costs as incurred. Repair, removal and maintenance costs are included in the Consolidated Statements of Income as Operation and maintenance expense.
Assessing Impairment of Long-lived Assets (including Intangible Assets) and Goodwill
The Partnership periodically evaluates long-lived assets, including property, plant and equipment, and specifically identifiable intangibles other than goodwill, when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of these assets may not be recoverable. The determination of whether an impairment has occurred is based on an estimate of undiscounted cash flows attributable to the assets, as compared to the carrying value of the assets. For more information, see Note 11.
The Partnership assesses its goodwill for impairment annually on October 1st, or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of goodwill may not be recoverable. Goodwill is assessed for impairment by comparing the fair value of the reporting unit with its book value, including goodwill. The Partnership utilizes the market or income approaches to estimate the fair value of the reporting unit, also giving consideration to the alternative cost approach. Under the market approach, historical and current year forecasted cash flows are multiplied by a market multiple to determine fair value. Under the income approach, anticipated cash flows over a period of years plus a terminal value are discounted to present value using appropriate discount rates. If the estimated fair value of the reporting unit is less than the carrying amount of the reporting unit, then a second step must be completed in order to determine the amount of the goodwill impairment that should be recorded. In the second step, the implied fair value of the reporting unit’s goodwill is determined by allocating the reporting unit’s fair value to all of its assets and liabilities other than goodwill (including any unrecognized intangible assets) in a manner similar to a purchase price allocation. The resulting implied fair value of the goodwill that results from the application of this second step is then compared to the carrying amount of the goodwill and an impairment charge is recorded for the difference. The Partnership performs its goodwill impairment testing one level below the transportation and storage and gathering and processing segment level at the operating segment level. For more information, see Note 8.
Regulatory Assets and Liabilities
The Partnership applies the guidance for accounting for regulated operations to portions of the transportation and storage segment. The Partnership’s rate-regulated businesses recognize removal costs as a component of depreciation expense in accordance with regulatory treatment. As of each of December 31, 2016 and 2015, these removal costs of $19 million and $18 million, respectively, are classified as Regulatory liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Capitalization of Interest and Allowance for Funds Used During Construction
Allowance for funds used during construction (AFUDC) represents the approximate net composite interest cost of borrowed funds and a reasonable return on the equity funds used for construction. Although AFUDC increases both utility plant and earnings, it is realized in cash when the assets are included in rates for combined entities that apply guidance for accounting for regulated operations. Capitalized interest represents the approximate net composite interest cost of borrowed funds used for construction. Interest and AFUDC are capitalized as a component of projects under construction and will be amortized over the assets’ estimated useful lives. During the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, the Partnership capitalized interest and AFUDC of $4 million, $10 million and $8 million, respectively.
Derivative Instruments
The Partnership is exposed to various market risks. These risks arise from transactions entered into in the normal course of business. At times, the Partnership utilizes derivative instruments such as physical forward contracts, financial futures and swaps to mitigate the impact of changes in commodity prices on its operating results and cash flows. Such derivatives are recognized in the Partnership’s Consolidated Balance Sheets at their fair value unless the Partnership elects hedge accounting or the normal purchase and sales exemption for qualified physical transactions. For derivative instruments not designated as hedging instruments, the gain or loss on the derivative is recognized in Product sales in the Consolidated Statements of Income. A derivative may be designated as a normal purchase or normal sale if the intent is to physically receive or deliver the product for use or sale in the normal course of business.
The Partnership’s policies prohibit the use of leveraged financial instruments. A leveraged financial instrument, for this purpose, is a transaction involving a derivative whose financial impact will be based on an amount other than the notional amount or volume of the instrument.
12

Exhibit 99.05
Fair Value Measurements
The Partnership determines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. As required, the Partnership utilizes valuation techniques that maximize the use of observable inputs (levels 1 and 2) and minimize the use of unobservable inputs (level 3) within the fair value hierarchy included in current accounting guidance. The Partnership generally applies the market approach to determine fair value. This method uses pricing and other information generated by market transactions for identical or comparable assets and liabilities. Assets and liabilities are classified within the fair value hierarchy based on the lowest level (least observable) input that is significant to the measurement in its entirety.
Equity Based Compensation
The Partnership awards equity based compensation to officers, directors and employees under the Long Term Incentive Plan. All equity based awards to officers, directors and employees under the Long Term Incentive Plan, including grants of performance units, time-based phantom units (phantom units) and time-based restricted units (restricted units) are recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Income based on their fair values. The fair value of the phantom units and restricted units are based on the closing market price of the Partnership’s common unit on the grant date. The fair value of the performance units is estimated on the grant date using a lattice-based valuation model that factors in information, including the expected distribution yield, expected price volatility, risk-free interest rate and the probable outcome of the market condition, over the expected life of the performance units. Compensation expense for the phantom unit and restricted unit awards is a fixed amount determined at the grant date fair value and is recognized as services are rendered by employees over a vesting period. The vesting of the performance unit awards is also contingent upon the probable outcome of the market condition. Depending on forfeitures and actual vesting, the compensation expense recognized related to the awards could increase or decrease.
Reverse Unit Split
On March 25, 2014, the Partnership effected a 1 for 1.279082616 reverse unit split. All unit and per unit amounts presented within the consolidated financial statements reflect the effects of the reverse unit split.
Third Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Enable Midstream Partners, LP
On February 18, 2016, in connection with the closing of the private placement of 14,520,000 Series A Preferred Units and pursuant to the Purchase Agreement, the General Partner adopted the Third Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership which, among other things, authorized and established the terms of the Series A Preferred Units and the other series of preferred units that are issuable upon conversion of the Series A Preferred Units. For further information related to the issuance of the Series A Preferred Units, see Note 5.
Fourth Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Enable Midstream Partners, LP
On June 22, 2016, the General Partner adopted the Fourth Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership (the Partnership Agreement), which changed the last permitted distribution date with respect to each fiscal quarter from 45 days following the close of such quarter to 60 days following the close of such quarter.
(2) New Accounting Pronouncements
Revenue from Contracts with Customers
In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606),” which supersedes the revenue recognition requirements in “Revenue Recognition (Topic 605).” Topic 606 is based on the core principle that revenue is recognized to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled to in exchange for those goods or services. Topic 606 also requires additional disclosure about the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from contracts with customers, including significant judgments and changes in judgments and assets recognized from costs incurred to obtain or fulfill a contract.
Topic 606 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within those years, with early adoption permitted in 2017, however we do not plan to adopt the standard early. Entities will have the option to apply the standard using a full retrospective or modified retrospective adoption method. The Partnership expects to adopt this ASU using the modified retrospective method. Our evaluation of the impact on our Consolidated Financial Statements and related disclosures is ongoing
13

Exhibit 99.05
and not complete. In connection with our assessment work, we formed an implementation work team, completed training on the Topic 606 revenue recognition model and are continuing our review of contracts relative to the provisions of Topic 606.
Leases
In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, “Leases (Topic 842).” This standard requires, among other things, that lessees recognize the following for all leases (with the exception of short-term leases) at the commencement date: (1) a lease liability, which is a lessee’s obligation to make lease payments arising from a lease, measured on a discounted basis; and (2) a right-of-use asset, which is an asset that represents the lessee’s right to use, or control the use of, a specified asset for the lease term. Lessees and lessors must apply a modified retrospective transition approach for leases existing at, or entered into after, the beginning of the earliest comparative period presented in the financial statements. The Partnership expects to adopt this standard in the first quarter of 2019 and is currently evaluating the impact of this standard on our Consolidated Financial Statements and related disclosures. In connection with our assessment work, we formed an implementation work team and are continuing a review of our contracts relative to the provisions of the lease standard.
Share-Based Compensation
In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-09, “Compensation—Stock Compensation (Topic 718).” This standard makes several modifications to Topic 718 related to the accounting for forfeitures, employer tax withholding on share-based compensation and the financial statement presentation of excess tax benefits or deficiencies. ASU 2016-09 also clarifies the statement of cash flows presentation for certain components of share-based awards. The standard is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning in 2017, although early adoption is permitted. The Partnership will adopt the amendment in the fourth quarter of 2017, and does not expect the adoption of this standard to have a material impact on our Consolidated Financial Statements and related disclosures.
Financial Instruments—Credit Losses
In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-13, “Financial Instruments—Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments.” This standard requires entities to measure all expected credit losses of financial assets held at a reporting date based on historical experience, current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts in order to record credit losses in a more timely matter. ASU 2016-13 also amends the accounting for credit losses on available-for-sale debt securities and purchased financial assets with credit deterioration. The standard is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2019, although early adoption is permitted for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018. The guidance requires application using a modified retrospective method. The Partnership does not expect the adoption of this standard to have a material impact on our Consolidated Financial Statements and related disclosures.
Statement of Cash Flows
In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-15, “Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments.” This standard is intended to reduce existing diversity in practice in how certain transactions are presented on the statement of cash flows. The standard is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, although early adoption is permitted. The guidance requires application using a retrospective transition method. The Partnership will adopt ASU No. 2016-15 in the first quarter of 2017 and has determined the amendment will not have a material impact on our Consolidated Financial Statements and related disclosures.
Income Taxes
In October 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-16, “Income Taxes (Topic 740): Intra-Entity Transfers of Assets Other Than Inventory.” This standard requires entities to recognize the tax consequences of an intra-entity transfer of an asset other than inventory when the transfer occurs. The standard is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, although early adoption is permitted as of the beginning of an annual period (i.e., only in the first interim period). The guidance requires application using a modified retrospective approach. The Partnership is currently evaluating the impact, if any, the adoption of this standard will have on our Consolidated Financial Statements and related disclosures.
14

Exhibit 99.05
Restricted Cash
In November 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-18, “Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Restricted Cash.” The standard is intended to provide specific guidance on the cash flow classification and presentation of changes in restricted cash. The Partnership early adopted the amendment in the fourth quarter of 2016, using a retrospective basis. As of December 31, 2016, the Partnership had restricted cash of $17 million. The Partnership had no restricted cash as of December 31, 2015.
(3) Acquisition
On April 22, 2015, Enable entered into an agreement with Monarch Natural Gas, LLC, pursuant to which the Partnership agreed to acquire approximately 106 miles of gathering pipeline, approximately 5,000 horsepower of associated compression, right-of-ways and certain other midstream assets that provide natural gas gathering services in the Greater Granite Wash area of Texas. The transaction closed on May 1, 2015. The aggregate purchase price for this transaction was approximately $80 million, which was funded from cash generated from operations and borrowings under our Revolving Credit Facility.
The acquisition was accounted for as a business combination. During the third quarter of 2015, the Partnership, with the assistance of a third-party valuation expert, finalized the purchase price allocation as of May 1, 2015.

Purchase price allocation (in millions): |
Property, plant and equipment | $ | 51 |
Intangibles | 10 |
Goodwill | 19 |
Total | $ | 80 |

The Partnership recognized intangible assets related to customer relationships. The acquired intangible assets will be amortized on a straight-line basis over the estimated customer contract life of approximately 15 years. Goodwill recognized from the acquisition primarily relates to the value created from additional growth opportunities and greater operating leverage in the Anadarko Basin. See Note 8 for further information related to the Partnership’s goodwill impairment. The Partnership incurred less than $1 million of acquisition costs associated with this transaction, which are included in General and administrative expense in the Consolidated Statements of Income.
(4) Earnings Per Limited Partner Unit
Basic and diluted earnings per limited partner unit is calculated by dividing net income (loss) allocable to common and subordinated unitholders by the weighted average number of common and subordinated units outstanding during the period. Any common units issued during the period are included on a weighted average basis for the days in which they were outstanding. The dilutive effect of the unit-based awards discussed in Note 17 was less than $0.01 per unit during the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014.
15

Exhibit 99.05
The following table illustrates the Partnership’s calculation of earnings (loss) per unit for common and subordinated units:

| Year Ended December 31,
| 2016 |  | 2015 |  | 2014
| (In millions, except per unit data)
Net income (loss) | $ | 313 |  |  | $ | (771 | ) |  | $ | 533 |
Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interest | 1 |  |  | (19 | ) |  | 3 |
Series A Preferred Unit distribution | 22 |  |  | — |  |  | — |
General partner interest in net income | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |
Net income (loss) available to common and subordinated unitholders | $ | 290 |  |  | $ | (752 | ) |  | $ | 530 |
Net income (loss) allocable to common units | $ | 148 |  |  | $ | (381 | ) |  | $ | 339 |
Net income (loss) allocable to subordinated units | 142 |  |  | (371 | ) |  | 191 |
Net income (loss) available to common and subordinated unitholders | $ | 290 |  |  | $ | (752 | ) |  | $ | 530 |
Net income (loss) allocable to common units | $ | 148 |  |  | $ | (381 | ) |  | $ | 339 |
Dilutive effect of Series A Preferred Unit distribution | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |
Dilutive effect of performance units | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |
Diluted net income (loss) allocable to common units | 148 |  |  | (381 | ) |  | 339 |
Diluted net income (loss) allocable to subordinated units | 142 |  |  | (371 | ) |  | 191 |
Total | $ | 290 |  |  | $ | (752 | ) |  | $ | 530 |
Basic weighted average number of outstanding |  |  |  |  |
Common units | 216 |  |  | 214 |  |  | 264 |
Subordinated units | 208 |  |  | 208 |  |  | 148 |
Total | 424 |  |  | 422 |  |  | 412 |
Basic earnings (loss) per unit |  |  |  |  |
Common units | $ | 0.69 |  |  | $ | (1.78 | ) |  | $ | 1.29 |
Subordinated units | $ | 0.68 |  |  | $ | (1.78 | ) |  | $ | 1.28 |
Basic weighted average number of outstanding common units | 216 |  |  | 214 |  |  | 264 |
Dilutive effect of Series A Preferred Units | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |
Dilutive effect of performance units | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |
Diluted weighted average number of outstanding common units | 216 |  |  | 214 |  |  | 264 |
Diluted weighted average number of outstanding subordinated units | 208 |  |  | 208 |  |  | 148 |
Total | 424 |  |  | 422 |  |  | 412 |
Diluted earnings (loss) per unit |  |  |  |  |
Common units | $ | 0.69 |  |  | $ | (1.78 | ) |  | $ | 1.29 |
Subordinated units | $ | 0.68 |  |  | $ | (1.78 | ) |  | $ | 1.28 |

(5) Enable Midstream Partners, LP Partners’ Equity
The Partnership Agreement requires that, within 60 days subsequent to the end of each quarter, the Partnership distribute all of its available cash (as defined in the Partnership Agreement) to unitholders of record on the applicable record date. The Partnership did not make distributions for the period that began on April 1, 2014 and ended on April 15, 2014, the day prior to the closing of the IPO, other than the required distributions to CenterPoint Energy, OGE Energy and ArcLight under the Partnership Agreement.
16

Exhibit 99.05
On February 14, 2014, May 14, 2014 and August 14, 2014, the Partnership distributed $114 million, $155 million and $22 million to the unitholders of record as of January 1, 2014, April 1, 2014 and April 1, 2014, respectively in accordance with the Partnership’s First Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership.
The Partnership paid or has authorized payment of the following cash distributions to common and subordinated unitholders during 2016, 2015 and 2014 (in millions, except for per unit amounts):

Quarter Ended |  | Record Date |  | Payment Date |  | Per Unit Distribution |  | Total Cash Distribution
December 31, 2016(1) |  | February 21, 2017 |  | February 28, 2017 |  | $ | 0.318 |  |  | $ | 137 |
September 30, 2016 |  | November 14, 2016 |  | November 22, 2016 |  | $ | 0.318 |  |  | $ | 134 |
June 30, 2016 |  | August 16, 2016 |  | August 23, 2016 |  | $ | 0.318 |  |  | $ | 134 |
March 31, 2016 |  | May 6, 2016 |  | May 13, 2016 |  | $ | 0.318 |  |  | $ | 134 |
December 31, 2015 |  | February 2, 2016 |  | February 12, 2016 |  | $ | 0.318 |  |  | $ | 134 |
September 30, 2015 |  | November 3, 2015 |  | November 13, 2015 |  | $ | 0.318 |  |  | $ | 134 |
June 30, 2015 |  | August 3, 2015 |  | August 13, 2015 |  | $ | 0.316 |  |  | $ | 134 |
March 31, 2015 |  | May 5, 2015 |  | May 15, 2015 |  | $ | 0.3125 |  |  | $ | 132 |
December 31, 2014 |  | February 4, 2015 |  | February 13, 2015 |  | $ | 0.30875 |  |  | $ | 130 |
September 30, 2014 |  | November 4, 2014 |  | November 14, 2014 |  | $ | 0.3025 |  |  | $ | 128 |
June 30, 2014 (2) |  | August 4, 2014 |  | August 14, 2014 |  | $ | 0.2464 |  |  | $ | 104 |

_____________________

(1) | The board of directors of Enable GP declared this $0.318 per common unit cash distribution on February 10, 2017, to be paid on February 28, 2017, to common and subordinated unitholders of record at the close of business on February 21, 2017.

(2) | The quarterly distribution for three months ended June 30, 2014 was prorated for the period beginning immediately after the closing of the Partnership’s IPO, April 16, 2014 through June 30, 2014.

The Partnership paid or has authorized payment of the following cash distributions to holders of the Series A Preferred Units during 2016 (in millions, except for per unit amounts):

Quarter Ended |  | Record Date |  | Payment Date |  | Per Unit Distribution |  | Total Cash Distribution
December 31, 2016(1) |  | February 10, 2017 |  | February 15, 2017 |  | $ | 0.625 |  |  | $ | 9 |
September 30, 2016 |  | November 1, 2016 |  | November 14, 2016 |  | $ | 0.625 |  |  | $ | 9 |
June 30, 2016 |  | August 2, 2016 |  | August 12, 2016 |  | $ | 0.625 |  |  | $ | 9 |
March 31, 2016(2) |  | May 6, 2016 |  | May 13, 2016 |  | $ | 0.2917 |  |  | $ | 4 |

_____________________

(1) | The board of directors of Enable GP declared this $0.625 per Series A Preferred Unit cash distribution on February 10, 2017, which was paid on February 15, 2017 to Series A Preferred unitholders of record at the close of business on February 10, 2017.

(2) | The prorated quarterly distribution for the Series A Preferred Units is for a partial period beginning on February 18, 2016, and ending on March 31, 2016, which equates to $0.625 per unit on a full-quarter basis or $2.50 per unit on an annualized basis.

General Partner Interest and Incentive Distribution Rights
Enable GP owns a non-economic general partner interest in the Partnership and thus will not be entitled to distributions that the Partnership makes prior to the liquidation of the Partnership in respect of such general partner interest. Enable GP currently holds incentive distribution rights that entitle it to receive increasing percentages, up to a maximum of 50.0%, of the cash the Partnership distributes from operating surplus (as defined in the Partnership Agreement) in excess of $0.330625 per unit per quarter. The maximum distribution of 50.0% does not include any distributions that Enable GP or its affiliates may receive on common units or subordinated units that they own.
17

Exhibit 99.05
Subordinated Units
General
As of December 31, 2016, all subordinated units are held by CenterPoint Energy and OGE Energy. These units are considered subordinated because for a period of time, defined by the Partnership Agreement as the subordination period, the subordinated units will not be entitled to receive any distributions until the common units have received distributions of available cash each quarter from operating surplus in an amount equal to the minimum quarterly distribution plus any arrearages on minimum quarterly distributions on the common units from prior quarters. In addition, the subordinated units are not entitled to arrearages on minimum quarterly distributions. On the expiration of the subordination period, the subordinated units will convert to common units on a one-for-one basis.
Subordination Period
The subordination period began on the closing date of the IPO and expires on the first to occur of the following dates: (1) the first business day following the distribution of available cash in respect of any quarter beginning with the quarter ending June 30, 2017 that the following tests are met: (a) distributions of available cash from operating surplus on each of the outstanding common units and subordinated units equal or exceed $1.15 per unit (the annualized minimum quarterly distribution) for each of the three consecutive, non-overlapping four-quarter periods immediately preceding that date; (b) the adjusted operating surplus generated during each of the three consecutive, non-overlapping four-quarter periods immediately preceding that date equaled or exceeded the sum $1.15 (the annualized minimum quarterly distribution) on all of the common units and subordinated units outstanding during those periods on a fully diluted weighted average basis; and (c) there are no arrearages in the payment of the minimum quarterly distributions on the common units or (2) the first business day following the distribution of available cash in respect of any quarter beginning with the quarter ending June 30, 2015 that the following tests are met: (a) distributions of available cash from operating surplus on each of the outstanding common units and subordinated units equal to or exceeding $1.725 per unit (150% of the annualized minimum quarterly distribution) for the four consecutive quarter period immediately preceding that date; (b) the adjusted operating surplus generated during the four consecutive quarter period immediately preceding that date equaled or exceed $1.725 per unit (150% of the annualized minimum quarterly distribution) on all of the common units and subordinated units outstanding during that period on a fully diluted weighted average basis plus the corresponding incentive distribution rights; and (c) there are no arrearages in the payment of the minimum quarterly distributions on the common units.
Series A Preferred Units
On February 18, 2016, the Partnership completed the private placement of 14,520,000 Series A Preferred Units representing limited partner interests in the Partnership for a cash purchase price of $25.00 per Series A Preferred Unit, resulting in proceeds of $362 million, net of issuance costs. The Partnership incurred approximately $1 million of expenses related to the offering, which is shown as an offset to the proceeds. In connection with the closing of the private placement, the Partnership redeemed approximately $363 million of notes scheduled to mature in 2017 payable to a wholly-owned subsidiary of CenterPoint Energy.
Pursuant to the Partnership Agreement, the Series A Preferred Units:

• | rank senior to the Partnership’s common units with respect to the payment of distributions and distribution of assets upon liquidation, dissolution and winding up;

• | have no stated maturity;

• | are not subject to any sinking fund; and

• | will remain outstanding indefinitely unless repurchased or redeemed by the Partnership or converted into its common units in connection with a change of control.

Holders of the Series A Preferred Units receive a quarterly cash distribution on a non-cumulative basis if and when declared by the General Partner, and subject to certain adjustments, equal to an annual rate of: 10% on the stated liquidation preference of $25.00 from the date of original issue to, but not including, the five year anniversary of the original issue date; and thereafter a percentage of the stated liquidation preference equal to the sum of the three-month LIBOR plus 8.5%.
At any time on or after five years after the original issue date, the Partnership may redeem the Series A Preferred Units, in whole or in part, from any source of funds legally available for such purpose, by paying $25.50 per unit plus an amount equal to all accumulated and unpaid distributions thereon to the date of redemption, whether or not declared. In addition, the Partnership (or a third-party with its prior written consent) may redeem the Series A Preferred Units following certain changes in the methodology employed by ratings agencies, changes of control or fundamental transactions as set forth in the Partnership
18

Exhibit 99.05
Agreement. If, upon a change of control or certain fundamental transactions, the Partnership (or a third-party with its prior written consent) does not exercise this option, then the holders of the Series A Preferred Units have the option to convert the Series A Preferred Units into a number of common units per Series A Preferred Unit as set forth in the Partnership Agreement. The Series A Preferred Units are also required to be redeemed in certain circumstances if they are not eligible for trading on the New York Stock Exchange.
Holders of Series A Preferred Units have no voting rights except for limited voting rights with respect to potential amendments to the Partnership Agreement that have a material adverse effect on the existing terms of the Series A Preferred Units, the issuance by the Partnership of certain securities, approval of certain fundamental transactions and as required by law.
Upon the transfer of any Series A Preferred Unit to a non-affiliate of CenterPoint Energy, the Series A Preferred Units will automatically convert into a new series of preferred units (the Series B Preferred Units) on the later of the date of transfer and the second anniversary of the date of issue. The Series B Preferred Units will have the same terms as the Series A Preferred Units except that unpaid distributions on the Series B Preferred Units will accrue on a cumulative basis until paid.
On February 18, 2016, the Partnership entered into a registration rights agreement with CenterPoint Energy, pursuant to which, among other things, the Partnership gave CenterPoint Energy certain rights to require the Partnership to file and maintain a registration statement with respect to the resale of the Series A Preferred Units and any other series of preferred units or common units representing limited partner interests in the Partnership that are issuable upon conversion of the Series A Preferred Units.
2016 Equity Issuance
On November 29, 2016, the Partnership closed a public offering of 10,000,000 common units at a price to the public of $14.00 per common unit. In connection with the offering, the Partnership, the underwriters and an affiliate of ArcLight entered into an underwriting agreement that provided an option for the underwriters to purchase up to an additional 1,500,000 common units, with 75,719 common units to be sold by the Partnership and 1,424,281 to be sold by the affiliate of ArcLight. The underwriters exercised the option to purchase all of the additional common units, and the Partnership received proceeds (net of underwriting discounts, structuring fees and offering expenses) of $137 million from the offering.
19

Exhibit 99.05
(6) Property, Plant and Equipment
Property, plant and equipment includes the following:

| Weighted Average Useful Lives (Years) |  | December 31,
|  | 2016 |  | 2015
|  |  | (In millions)
Property, plant and equipment, gross: |  |  |  |  |
Gathering and Processing | 37 |  | $ | 6,987 |  |  | $ | 6,478 |
Transportation and Storage | 36 |  | 4,498 |  |  | 4,444 |
Construction work-in-progress |  |  | 82 |  |  | 371 |
Total |  |  | $ | 11,567 |  |  | $ | 11,293 |
Accumulated depreciation: |  |  |  |  |
Gathering and Processing |  |  | 681 |  |  | 510 |
Transportation and Storage |  |  | 743 |  |  | 652 |
Total accumulated depreciation |  |  | 1,424 |  |  | 1,162 |
Property, plant and equipment, net |  |  | $ | 10,143 |  |  | $ | 10,131 |

The Partnership recorded depreciation expense of $311 million, $291 million and $249 million during the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively.
20

Exhibit 99.05
(7) Intangible Assets, Net
As of December 31, 2016, the Partnership has $405 million in intangible assets associated with customer relationships due to the acquisition of Enogex and Monarch Natural Gas, LLC.
Intangible assets consist of the following:

| December 31,
| 2016 |  | 2015
| (In millions)
Customer relationships: |  |  |
Total intangible assets | $ | 405 |  |  | $ | 405 |
Accumulated amortization | 99 |  |  | 72 |
Net intangible assets | $ | 306 |  |  | $ | 333 |

The Partnership determined that intangible assets related to customer relationships have a weighted average useful life of 15 years. Intangible assets do not have any significant residual value or renewal options of existing terms. There are no intangible assets with indefinite useful lives.
The Partnership recorded amortization expense of $27 million, $27 million and $27 million during the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively. The following table summarizes the Partnership’s expected amortization of intangible assets for each of the next five years:

| 2017 |  | 2018 |  | 2019 |  | 2020 |  | 2021
| (In millions)
Expected amortization of intangible assets | $ | 27 |  |  | $ | 27 |  |  | $ | 27 |  |  | $ | 27 |  |  | $ | 27 |

(8) Goodwill
For the periods ended prior to September 30, 2015, the goodwill associated with the gathering and processing reportable segment is primarily related to the acquisitions of Enogex, Waskom and Monarch. The Partnership recognized $438 million of goodwill as a result of the acquisition of Enogex, which occurred at the time of the formation of the Partnership in 2013. The $579 million of goodwill associated with the transportation and storage reportable segment was related to the original acquisitions of EGT and MRT in 1997 by predecessors of the Partnership. Subsequent to the completion of the October 1, 2014 annual test and previous interim assessment as of December 31, 2014, the crude oil and natural gas industry was impacted by further commodity price declines, which consequently resulted in decreased producer activity in certain regions in which the Partnership operates. Due to the continuing commodity price declines, the resulting decreases in forward commodity prices and forecasted producer activities, and an increase in the weighted average cost of capital, the Partnership determined that the impact on our forecasted discounted cash flows for our gathering and processing and transportation and storage reportable segments would be significantly reduced. As a result, when the Partnership performed our annual goodwill impairment analysis as of October 1, 2015, we determined that goodwill was completely impaired in the amount of $1,087 million, which is included in Impairments on the Consolidated Statements of Income for the year ended December 31, 2015. As a result, the Partnership did not have any goodwill recorded as of December 31, 2016 and 2015.
21

Exhibit 99.05
The change in carrying amount of goodwill in each of our reportable segments is as follows:

| Gathering and Processing |  | Transportation and Storage |  | Total
| (in millions)
Balance as of December 31, 2014 | $ | 489 |  |  | $ | 579 |  |  | $ | 1,068 |
Acquisition of Monarch | 19 |  |  | — |  |  | 19 |
Goodwill impairment | (508 | ) |  | (579 | ) |  | (1,087 | )
Balance as of December 31, 2015 | $ | — |  |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | — |
Balance as of December 31, 2016 | $ | — |  |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | — |

22

Exhibit 99.05
(9) Investment in Equity Method Affiliate
The Partnership uses the equity method of accounting for investments in entities in which it has an ownership interest between 20% and 50% and exercises significant influence.
For the period December 31, 2013 through May 29, 2014, the Partnership held a 24.95% interest in SESH, which is accounted for as an investment in equity method affiliate, and CenterPoint Energy indirectly owned a 25.05% interest in SESH. Pursuant to the MFA, that interest could be contributed to the Partnership upon exercise of certain put or call rights, under which CenterPoint Energy would contribute to the Partnership CenterPoint Energy’s retained interest in SESH at a price equal to the fair market value of such interest at the time the put right or call right is exercised. On May 13, 2014, CenterPoint Energy exercised its put right with respect to a 24.95% interest in SESH. Pursuant to the put right, on May 30, 2014, CenterPoint Energy contributed a 24.95% interest in SESH to the Partnership in exchange for 6,322,457 common units, which had a fair value of $161 million based upon the closing market price of the Partnership’s common units. For the period from May 30, 2014 through June 29, 2015, the Partnership held a 49.90% interest in SESH. On June 12, 2015, CenterPoint Energy exercised its put right with respect to its remaining 0.1% interest in SESH. Pursuant to the put right, on June 30, 2015, CenterPoint Energy contributed a 0.1% interest in SESH to the Partnership in exchange for 25,341 common units, which had a fair value of $1 million based upon the closing market price of the Partnership’s common units. Spectra Energy Partners, LP owns the remaining 50% interest in SESH. Pursuant to the terms of the SESH LLC Agreement, if, at any time, CenterPoint Energy has a right to receive less than 50% of our distributions through its limited partner interest in the Partnership and its economic interest in Enable GP, or does not have the ability to exercise certain control rights, Spectra Energy Partners, LP could have the right to purchase our interest in SESH at fair market value, subject to certain exceptions. As of December 31, 2016, the Partnership owned a 50% interest in SESH.
In connection with CenterPoint Energy’s exercise of its put right with respect to its 24.95% interest in SESH, the parties agreed to allocate the distributions for the quarter ended June 30, 2014 on (i) the SESH interest acquired by Enable and (ii) the Enable units issued to CenterPoint Energy for the SESH interest pro rata based on the time each party held the relevant interest. On July 25, 2014, the Partnership received a $7 million distribution from SESH for the three month period ended June 30, 2014, representing the Partnership’s 49.90% interest in SESH. Under the terms of the agreement, the Partnership made a payment of approximately $1 million to CenterPoint Energy related to the additional 24.95% interest during the quarter ending September 30, 2014.
On June 13, 2014, SESH made a special distribution of the proceeds of its $400 million senior note issuance, less debt issuance costs, which resulted in a $198 million return of investment to the Partnership. In August 2014, the Partnership contributed $187 million to SESH which was utilized to repay SESH’s $375 million senior notes due August 2014, increasing the book value of Enable’s 50% investment in SESH. The Partnership and other members of SESH intend to contribute or otherwise return the remaining special distribution to SESH as necessary for general SESH purposes, including capital expenditures associated with SESH’s expansion plans.
The Partnership shares operations of SESH with Spectra Energy Partners, LP under service agreements. The Partnership is responsible for the field operations of SESH. SESH reimburses each party for actual costs incurred, which are billed based upon a combination of direct charges and allocations. During the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, the Partnership billed SESH $13 million, $12 million and $13 million, respectively, associated with these service agreements.
The Partnership includes equity in earnings of equity method affiliate under the Other Income (Expense) caption in the Consolidated Statements of Income for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014.
23

Exhibit 99.05
Investment in Equity Method Affiliate:

| (In millions)
Balance as of December 31, 2013 | $ | 198 |
Interest acquisition of SESH | 161 |
Return of investment from SESH refinancing | (198 | )
Additional investment in SESH | 187 |
Equity in earnings of equity method affiliate | 20 |
Contributions to equity method affiliate | 3 |
Distributions from equity method affiliate(1) | (23 | )
Balance as of December 31, 2014 | 348 |
Interest acquisition of SESH | 1 |
Equity in earnings of equity method affiliate | 29 |
Contributions to equity method affiliate | 8 |
Distributions from equity method affiliate(1) | (42 | )
Balance as of December 31, 2015 | 344 |
Equity in earnings of equity method affiliate | 28 |
Distributions from equity method affiliate(1) | (43 | )
Balance as of December 31, 2016 | $ | 329 |

____________________

(1) | Distributions from equity method affiliate includes a $28 million, $34 million and $23 million return on investment and a $15 million, $8 million and zero return of investment for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively.

Equity in Earnings of Equity Method Affiliate:

| Year Ended December 31,
| 2016 |  | 2015 |  | 2014
| (In millions)
SESH | $ | 28 |  |  | $ | 29 |  |  | $ | 20 |

Distributions from Equity Method Affiliate:

| Year Ended December 31,
| 2016 |  | 2015 |  | 2014
| (In millions)
SESH (1) | $ | 43 |  |  | $ | 42 |  |  | $ | 23 |

_____________________

(1) | Excludes $198 million in special distributions for the return of investment in SESH for the year ended December 31, 2014.

24

Exhibit 99.05
Summarized financial information of SESH:

| December 31,
| 2016 |  | 2015
| (In millions)
Balance Sheet Data: |  |  |
Current assets | $ | 31 |  |  | $ | 45 |
Property, plant and equipment, net | 1,110 |  |  | 1,127 |
Total assets | $ | 1,141 |  |  | $ | 1,172 |
Current liabilities | $ | 18 |  |  | $ | 18 |
Long-term debt | 397 |  |  | 397 |
Members’ equity | 726 |  |  | 757 |
Total liabilities and members’ equity | $ | 1,141 |  |  | $ | 1,172 |
Reconciliation: |  |  |
Investment in SESH | $ | 329 |  |  | $ | 344 |
Less: Capitalized interest on investment in SESH | (1 | ) |  | (1 | )
Add: Basis differential, net of amortization | 35 |  |  | 36 |
The Partnership’s share of members’ equity | $ | 363 |  |  | $ | 379 |

| Year Ended December 31,
| 2016 |  | 2015 |  | 2014
| (In millions)
Income Statement Data: |  |  |  |  |
Revenues | $ | 115 |  |  | $ | 115 |  |  | $ | 108 |
Operating income | $ | 73 |  |  | $ | 71 |  |  | $ | 69 |
Net income | $ | 55 |  |  | $ | 57 |  |  | $ | 48 |

25

Exhibit 99.05
(10) Debt
The following table presents the Partnership’s outstanding debt as of December 31, 2016 and 2015.

| December 31,
| 2016 |  | 2015
| (In millions)
Commercial Paper | $ | — |  |  | $ | 236 |
Revolving Credit Facility | 636 |  |  | 310 |
2015 Term Loan Agreement | 450 |  |  | 450 |
Notes payable—affiliated companies (Note 14) | — |  |  | 363 |
2019 Notes | 500 |  |  | 500 |
2024 Notes | 600 |  |  | 600 |
2044 Notes | 550 |  |  | 550 |
EOIT Senior Notes | 250 |  |  | 250 |
Premium (Discount) on long-term debt | 17 |  |  | 23 |
Total debt | 3,003 |  |  | 3,282 |
Less: Short-term debt(1) | — |  |  | 236 |
Less: Unamortized debt expense | 10 |  |  | 12 |
Less: Notes payable—affiliated companies | — |  |  | 363 |
Total long-term debt | $ | 2,993 |  |  | $ | 2,671 |

___________________

(1) | There were no commercial paper borrowings outstanding as of December 31, 2016. Short-term debt includes $236 million of commercial paper as of December 31, 2015.

Maturities of outstanding debt, excluding unamortized premiums, are as follows (in millions):

2017 | $ | — |
2018 | 450 |
2019 | 500 |
2020 | 886 |
2021 | — |
Thereafter | 1,150 |

Revolving Credit Facility
On June 18, 2015, the Partnership amended and restated its Revolving Credit Facility to, among other things, increase the borrowing capacity thereunder to $1.75 billion and extend its maturity date to June 18, 2020. As of December 31, 2016, there were $636 million of principal advances and $3 million in letters of credit outstanding under the Revolving Credit Facility. The weighted average interest rate of the Revolving Credit Facility was 2.21% as of December 31, 2016.
The Revolving Credit Facility provides that outstanding borrowings bear interest at LIBOR and/or an alternate base rate, at the Partnership’s election, plus an applicable margin. The applicable margin is based on the Partnership’s applicable credit ratings. As of December 31, 2016, the applicable margin for LIBOR-based borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility was 1.50% based on the Partnership’s credit ratings. In addition, the Revolving Credit Facility requires the Partnership to pay a fee on unused commitments. The commitment fee is based on the Partnership’s applicable credit rating from the rating agencies. As of December 31, 2016, the commitment fee under the Revolving Credit Facility was 0.20% per annum based on the Partnership’s credit ratings. The commitment fee is recorded as interest expense in the Partnership’s Consolidated Statements of Income.
The Revolving Credit Facility contains a financial covenant requiring us to maintain a ratio of consolidated funded debt to consolidated EBITDA as defined under the Revolving Credit Facility as of the last day of each fiscal quarter of less than or equal to 5.00 to 1.00; provided that, for any three fiscal quarters including and following any fiscal quarter in which the aggregate value
26

Exhibit 99.05
of one or more acquisitions by us or certain of our subsidiaries with a purchase price of at least $25 million in the aggregate, the consolidated funded debt to consolidated EBITDA ratio as of the last day of each such fiscal quarter during such period would be permitted to be up to 5.50 to 1.00.
The Revolving Credit Facility also contains covenants that restrict us and certain subsidiaries in respect of, among other things, mergers and consolidations, sales of all or substantially all assets, incurrence of subsidiary indebtedness, incurrence of liens, transactions with affiliates, designation of subsidiaries as Excluded Subsidiaries (as defined in the Revolving Credit Facility), restricted payments, changes in the nature of their respective businesses and entering into certain restrictive agreements. Borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility are subject to acceleration upon the occurrence of certain defaults, including, among others, payment defaults on such facility, breach of representations, warranties and covenants, acceleration of indebtedness (other than intercompany and non-recourse indebtedness) of $100 million or more in the aggregate, change of control, nonpayment of uninsured money judgments in excess of $100 million and the occurrence of certain ERISA and bankruptcy events, subject where applicable to specified cure periods.
Commercial Paper
The Partnership has a commercial paper program pursuant to which the Partnership is authorized to issue up to $1.4 billion of commercial paper. The commercial paper program is supported by our Revolving Credit Facility, and outstanding commercial paper effectively reduces our borrowing capacity thereunder. There was zero and $236 million outstanding under our commercial paper program as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. On February 2, 2016, Standard & Poor’s Ratings Services lowered its credit rating on the Partnership from an investment grade rating to a non-investment grade rating. The short-term rating on the Partnership was also reduced from an investment grade rating to a non-investment grade rating. As a result of the downgrade, the Partnership repaid its outstanding borrowings under the commercial paper program upon maturity and did not issue any additional commercial paper.
Term Loan Agreement
On July 31, 2015, the Partnership entered into a Term Loan Agreement dated as of July 31, 2015, providing for an unsecured three-year $450 million term loan agreement (2015 Term Loan Agreement). The entire $450 million principal amount of the 2015 Term Loan Agreement was borrowed by the Partnership on July 31, 2015. The 2015 Term Loan Agreement contains an option, which may be exercised up to two times, to extend the term of the 2015 Term Loan Agreement, in each case, for an additional one-year term. The 2015 Term Loan Agreement provides an option to prepay, without penalty or premium, the amount outstanding, or any portion thereof, in a minimum amount of $1 million, or any multiple of $0.5 million in excess thereof. As of December 31, 2016, there was $450 million outstanding under the 2015 Term Loan Agreement.
The 2015 Term Loan Agreement provides that outstanding borrowings bear interest at LIBOR and/or an alternate base rate, at the Partnership’s election, plus an applicable margin. The applicable margin is based on our applicable credit ratings. As of December 31, 2016, the applicable margin for LIBOR-based borrowings under the 2015 Term Loan Agreement was 1.375% based on our credit ratings. As of December 31, 2016, the weighted average interest rate of the 2015 Term Loan Agreement was 1.86%.
The 2015 Term Loan Agreement contains substantially the same covenants as the Revolving Credit Facility.
Senior Notes
On May 27, 2014, the Partnership completed the private offering of $500 million 2.400% senior notes due 2019 (2019 Notes), $600 million 3.900% senior notes due 2024 (2024 Notes) and $550 million 5.000% senior notes due 2044 (2044 Notes), with registration rights. The Partnership received aggregate proceeds of $1.63 billion. Certain of the proceeds were used to repay the $1.05 billion senior unsecured 2013 Term Loan Agreement, the EOIT $250 million variable rate term loan, the EOIT $200 million 6.875% senior notes due July 15, 2014 and for general corporate purposes. On July 15, 2014, the Partnership repaid the EOIT $200 million 6.875% senior notes. A wholly owned subsidiary of CenterPoint Energy guaranteed collection of the Partnership’s obligations under the 2019 Notes and 2024 Notes. The guarantee expired on May 1, 2016. The 2019 Notes, 2024 Notes and 2044 Notes have a $1 million unamortized discount and $10 million of unamortized debt expense at December 31, 2016, resulting in effective interest rates of 2.59%, 4.02% and 5.09%, respectively, during the year ended December 31, 2016.
In connection with the issuance of the 2019 Notes, 2024 Notes and 2044 Notes, the Partnership, CenterPoint Energy Resources Corp., as guarantor, and RBS Securities Inc., Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated, Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC, and RBC Capital Markets, LLC, as representatives of the initial purchasers, entered into a registration rights agreement whereby the Partnership and the guarantor agreed to file with the SEC a registration statement relating to a registered offer to exchange the 2019 Notes, 2024 Notes and 2044 Notes for new series of the Partnership’s notes in the same aggregate principal
27

Exhibit 99.05
amount as, and with terms substantially identical in all respects to, the 2019 Notes, 2024 Notes and 2044 Notes. The agreement provided for the accrual of additional interest if the Partnership did not complete an exchange offer by October 9, 2015. Because an exchange offer was not consummated by October 9, 2015, additional interest began accruing on the 2019 Notes, 2024 Notes and 2044 Notes on October 10, 2015, at a rate of 0.25% per year until the first 90-day period after such date. On December 29, 2015, the Partnership completed the exchange offer. As a result, the Partnership recognized approximately $1 million of additional interest expense during 2015.
The indenture governing the 2019 Notes, 2024 Notes and 2044 Notes contains certain restrictions, including, among others, limitations on our ability and the ability of our principal subsidiaries to: (i) consolidate or merge and sell all or substantially all of our and our subsidiaries’ assets and properties; (ii) create, or permit to be created or to exist, any lien upon any of our or our principal subsidiaries’ principal property, or upon any shares of stock of any principal subsidiary, to secure any debt; and (iii) enter into certain sale-leaseback transactions. These covenants are subject to certain exceptions and qualifications.
As of December 31, 2016, the Partnership’s debt included EOIT’s $250 million 6.25% senior notes due March 2020 (the EOIT Senior Notes). The EOIT Senior Notes have an $18 million unamortized premium at December 31, 2016, resulting in an effective interest rate of 3.83% during the year ended December 31, 2016. These senior notes do not contain any financial covenants other than a limitation on liens. This limitation on liens is subject to certain exceptions and qualifications.
Financing Costs
Unamortized debt expense of $15 million and $18 million at December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively, is classified as either a reduction to Long-Term Debt or Other Assets in the Consolidated Balance Sheets and is being amortized over the life of the respective debt. Unamortized premium, net of unamortized discount on long-term debt of $17 million and $23 million at December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively, is classified as either Long-Term Debt or Short-Term Debt, consistent with the underlying debt instrument, in the Consolidated Balance Sheets and is being amortized over the life of the respective debt.
The Partnership recorded a $4 million loss on extinguishment of debt in the year ended December 31, 2014 associated with the retirement of the $1.05 billion 2013 Term Loan Agreement and the EOIT $250 million variable rate term loan, which is included in Other, net on the Consolidated Statements of Income.
As of December 31, 2016, the Partnership and EOIT were in compliance with all of their debt agreements, including financial covenants.
(11) Fair Value Measurements
Certain assets and liabilities are recorded at fair value in the Consolidated Balance Sheets and are categorized based upon the level of judgment associated with the inputs used to measure their value. Hierarchical levels, as defined below and directly related to the amount of subjectivity associated with the inputs to fair valuations of these assets and liabilities are as follows:
Level 1: Inputs are unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities at the measurement date. Instruments classified as Level 1 include natural gas futures, swaps and options transactions for contracts traded on the NYMEX and settled through a NYMEX clearing broker.
Level 2: Inputs, other than quoted prices included in Level 1, are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. Level 2 inputs include quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets, and inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability. Fair value assets and liabilities that are generally included in this category are derivatives with fair values based on inputs from actively quoted markets. Instruments classified as Level 2 include over-the-counter NYMEX natural gas swaps, natural gas basis swaps and natural gas purchase and sales transactions in markets such that the pricing is closely related to the NYMEX pricing, and over-the-counter WTI crude oil swaps for condensate sales.
Level 3: Inputs are unobservable for the asset or liability, and include situations where there is little, if any, market activity for the asset or liability. Unobservable inputs reflect the Partnership’s judgments about the assumptions market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability since limited market data exists. The Partnership develops these inputs based on the best information available, including the Partnership’s own data.
The Partnership utilizes the market approach in determining the fair value of its derivative positions by using either NYMEX or WTI published market prices, independent broker pricing data or broker/dealer valuations. The valuations of derivatives with pricing based on NYMEX published market prices may be considered Level 1 if they are settled through a NYMEX clearing broker account with daily margining. Over-the-counter derivatives with NYMEX or WTI based prices are considered Level 2 due to the impact of counterparty credit risk. Valuations based on independent broker pricing or broker/dealer valuations may be classified as Level 2 only to the extent they may be validated by an additional source of independent market data for an identical or closely related active market. In certain less liquid markets or for longer-term contracts, forward prices are not as readily available. In these circumstances, contracts are valued using internally developed methodologies that consider historical relationships among various quoted prices in active markets that result in management’s best estimate of fair value. These contracts are classified as Level 3.
The Partnership determines the appropriate level for each financial asset and liability on a quarterly basis and recognizes transfers between levels at the end of the reporting period. For the period ended December 31, 2016, there were no transfers between Level 2 and Level 3 instruments.
The impact to the fair value of derivatives due to credit risk is calculated using the probability of default based on Standard & Poor’s Ratings Services and/or internally generated ratings. The fair value of derivative assets is adjusted for credit risk. The fair value of derivative liabilities is adjusted for credit risk only if the impact is deemed material.
Estimated Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The fair values of all accounts receivable, notes receivable, accounts payable, commercial paper and other such financial instruments on the Consolidated Balance Sheets are estimated to be approximately equivalent to their carrying amounts and have been excluded from the table below. The following table summarizes the fair value and carrying amount of the Partnership’s financial instruments at December 31, 2016 and 2015:
28

Exhibit 99.05

| December 31, 2016 |  | December 31, 2015
| Carrying Amount |  | Fair Value |  | Carrying Amount |  | Fair Value
| (In millions)
Long-Term Debt |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Long-term notes payable—affiliated companies (Level 2) | $ | — |  |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | 363 |  |  | $ | 350 |
Revolving Credit Facility (Level 2)(1) | 636 |  |  | 636 |  |  | 310 |  |  | 310 |
2015 Term Loan Agreement (Level 2) | 450 |  |  | 450 |  |  | 450 |  |  | 450 |
EOIT Senior Notes (Level 2) | 268 |  |  | 260 |  |  | 273 |  |  | 280 |
Enable Midstream Partners, LP, 2019, 2024 and 2044 Notes (Level 2) | 1,649 |  |  | 1,521 |  |  | 1,650 |  |  | 1,255 |

___________________

(1) | Borrowing capacity is effectively reduced by our borrowings outstanding under the commercial paper program. There was zero and $236 million of commercial paper outstanding as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

The fair value of the Partnership’s Long-term notes payable—affiliated companies, Revolving Credit Facility, and 2015 Term Loan Agreement, along with the EOIT Senior Notes and Enable Midstream Partners, LP, 2019, 2024 and 2044 Notes, is based on quoted market prices and estimates of current rates available for similar issues with similar maturities and is classified as Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy.
Non-Financial Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Nonrecurring Basis
Certain assets and liabilities are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis; that is, the assets and liabilities are not measured at fair value on an ongoing basis, but are subject to fair value adjustments in certain circumstances (e.g., when there is evidence of impairment).
During the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, the Partnership remeasured the Service Star assets at fair v alue. At December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, management reassessed the carrying value of the Service Star business line, a component of the gathering and processing segment that provides measurement and communication services to third parties. The 2016 impairment, which impaired substantially all of the remaining net book value of the Service Star business line, was primarily driven by the impact of planned technology changes affecting Service Star. The 2015 impairment was based upon higher than expected losses of customers and the 2014 impairment was due to decreases of crude oil and natural gas prices. Based on forecasted future undiscounted cash flows management determined that the carrying value of the Service Star assets were not fully recoverable. The Partnership utilized the income approach (generally accepted valuation approach) to estimate the fair value of these assets. The primary inputs are forecasted cash flows and the discount rate. The fair value measurement is based on inputs that are not observable in the market and thus represent level 3 inputs. Applying a discounted cash flow model to the property, plant and equipment and reviewing the associated materials and supplies inventory, during the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, the Partnership recognized a $9 million, $10 million and $7 million impairment, respectively. The $9 million consisted of an $8 million write-down of property, plant and equipment and a $1 million write-down of materials and supplies inventory considered either excess or obsolete. The $10 million impairment consisted of a $9 million write-down of property, plant and equipment and a $1 million write-down of materials and supplies inventory considered either excess or obsolete. The $7 million impairment consisted of write-downs of property, plant and equipment.
At December 31, 2015, due to decreases of crude oil and natural gas prices during 2015, management reassessed the carrying value of the Partnership’s investment in the Atoka assets, a component of the gathering and processing segment. Based on forecasted future undiscounted cash flows, management determined that the carrying value of the Atoka assets were not fully recoverable. The Partnership utilized the income approach (generally accepted valuation approach) to estimate the fair value of these assets. The primary inputs are forecast cash flows and the discount rate. The fair value measurement is based on inputs that are not observable in the market and thus represent level 3 inputs. Applying a discounted cash flow model to the property, plant and equipment and intangible assets, the Partnership recognized a $25 million impairment during the year ended December 31, 2015. The $25 million impairment consisted of a $19 million write-down of property, plant and equipment and a $6 million write-down of intangible assets.
Additionally, during the year ended December 31, 2015, the Partnership recorded a $12 million impairment on jurisdictional pipelines in our transportation and storage segment.
29

Exhibit 99.05
Contracts with Master Netting Arrangements
Fair value amounts recognized for forward, interest rate swap, option and other conditional or exchange contracts executed with the same counterparty under a master netting arrangement may be offset. The reporting entity’s choice to offset or not must be applied consistently. A master netting arrangement exists if the reporting entity has multiple contracts, whether for the same type of conditional or exchange contract or for different types of contracts, with a single counterparty that are subject to a contractual agreement that provides for the net settlement of all contracts through a single payment in a single currency in the event of default on or termination of any one contract. Offsetting the fair values recognized for forward, interest rate swap, option and other conditional or exchange contracts outstanding with a single counterparty results in the net fair value of the transactions being reported as an asset or a liability in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The Partnership has presented the fair values of its derivative contracts under master netting agreements using a net fair value presentation.
The following tables summarize the Partnership’s assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2016 and 2015:

December 31, 2016 | Commodity Contracts |  | Gas Imbalances (1)
| Assets |  | Liabilities |  | Assets (2) |  | Liabilities (3)
| (In millions)
Quoted market prices in active market for identical assets (Level 1) | $ | 2 |  |  | $ | 22 |  |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | — |
Significant other observable inputs (Level 2) | — |  |  | 4 |  |  | 41 |  |  | 30 |
Unobservable inputs (Level 3) | — |  |  | 8 |  |  | — |  |  | — |
Total fair value | 2 |  |  | 34 |  |  | 41 |  |  | 30 |
Netting adjustments | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |
Total | $ | 2 |  |  | $ | 34 |  |  | $ | 41 |  |  | $ | 30 |

December 31, 2015 | Commodity Contracts |  | Gas Imbalances (1)
| Assets |  | Liabilities |  | Assets (2) |  | Liabilities (3)
| (In millions)
Quoted market prices in active market for identical assets (Level 1) | $ | 17 |  |  | $ | 3 |  |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | — |
Significant other observable inputs (Level 2) | 10 |  |  | — |  |  | 17 |  |  | 20 |
Unobservable inputs (Level 3) | 4 |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |
Total fair value | 31 |  |  | 3 |  |  | 17 |  |  | 20 |
Netting adjustments | (3 | ) |  | (3 | ) |  | — |  |  | — |
Total | $ | 28 |  |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | 17 |  |  | $ | 20 |

______________________

(1) | The Partnership uses the market approach to fair value its gas imbalance assets and liabilities at individual, or where appropriate an average of, current market indices applicable to the Partnership’s operations, not to exceed net realizable value. Gas imbalances held by EOIT are valued using an average of the Inside FERC Gas Market Report for Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co. (Texas, Oklahoma Mainline), ONEOK (Oklahoma) and ANR Pipeline (Oklahoma) indices. There were no netting adjustments as of December 31, 2016 and 2015.

(2) | Gas imbalance assets exclude fuel reserves for under retained fuel due from shippers of zero and $6 million at December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively, which fuel reserves are based on the value of natural gas at the time the imbalance was created and which are not subject to revaluation at fair market value.

(3) | Gas imbalance liabilities exclude fuel reserves for over retained fuel due to shippers of $5 million at each of December 31, 2016 and 2015, which fuel reserves are based on the value of natural gas at the time the imbalance was created and which are not subject to revaluation at fair market value.

30

Exhibit 99.05
Changes in Level 3 Fair Value Measurements
The following tables provides a reconciliation of changes in the fair value of our Level 3 financial assets between the periods presented.

| Commodity Contracts
| Crude oil (for condensate) financial futures/swaps |  | Natural gas liquids financial futures/swaps
| (In millions)
Balance as of December 31, 2014 | $ | 5 |  |  | $ | — |
Gains included in earnings | 12 |  |  | 10 |
Settlements | (8 | ) |  | (6 | )
Transfers out of Level 3(1) | (9 | ) |  | — |
Balance as of December 31, 2015 | — |  |  | 4 |
Losses included in earnings | — |  |  | (13 | )
Settlements | — |  |  | 1 |
Transfers out of Level 3 | — |  |  | — |
Balance as of December 31, 2016 | $ | — |  |  | $ | (8 | )

______________________

(1) | The Partnership utilizes WTI crude oil swaps to manage exposure to condensate price risk. As the over-the-counter WTI crude oil swap is an active market, these derivative instruments were classified as Level 2 as of December 31, 2015.

Quantitative Information on Level 3 Fair Value Measurements
The Partnership utilizes the market approach to measure the fair value of our commodity contracts. The significant unobservable inputs used in this approach to fair value are longer dated price quotes. Our sensitivity to these longer dated forward curve prices are presented in the table below. Significant changes in any of those inputs in isolation would result in significantly different fair value measurements, depending on our short or long position in contracts.

| December 31, 2016
Product Group | Fair Value |  | Forward Curve Range
| (In millions) |  | (Per gallon)
Natural gas liquids | $ | (8 | ) |  | $0.385 - $0.936

(12) Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities
The Partnership is exposed to certain risks relating to its ongoing business operations. The primary risk managed using derivative instruments is commodity price risk. The Partnership is also exposed to credit risk in its business operations.
Commodity Price Risk
The Partnership has used forward physical contracts, commodity price swap contracts and commodity price option features to manage the Partnership’s commodity price risk exposures in the past. Commodity derivative instruments used by the Partnership are as follows:

• | NGL put options, NGL futures and swaps, and WTI crude oil futures and swaps for condensate sales are used to manage the Partnership’s NGL and condensate exposure associated with its processing agreements;

• | natural gas futures and swaps are used to manage the Partnership’s natural gas exposure associated with its gathering, processing and transportation and storage assets; and

• | natural gas futures and swaps, natural gas options and natural gas commodity purchases and sales are used to manage the Partnership’s natural gas exposure associated with its storage and transportation contracts and asset management activities.

31

Exhibit 99.05
Normal purchases and normal sales contracts are not recorded in Other Assets or Liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheets and earnings are recognized and recorded in the period in which physical delivery of the commodity occurs. Management applies normal purchases and normal sales treatment to: (i) commodity contracts for the purchase and sale of natural gas used in or produced by the Partnership’s operations and (ii) commodity contracts for the purchase and sale of NGLs produced by the Partnership’s gathering and processing business.
The Partnership recognizes its non-exchange traded derivative instruments as Other Assets or Liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheets at fair value with such amounts classified as current or long-term based on their anticipated settlement. Exchange traded transactions are settled on a net basis daily through margin accounts with a clearing broker and, therefore, are recorded at fair value on a net basis in Other Current Assets in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
As of December 31, 2016 and 2015, the Partnership had no derivative instruments that were designated as cash flow or fair value hedges for accounting purposes.
Credit Risk
The Partnership is exposed to certain credit risks relating to its ongoing business operations. Credit risk includes the risk that counterparties that owe the Partnership money or energy will breach their obligations. If the counterparties to these arrangements fail to perform, the Partnership may seek or be forced to enter into alternative arrangements. In that event, the Partnership’s financial results could be adversely affected, and the Partnership could incur losses.
Derivatives Not Designated As Hedging Instruments
Derivative instruments not designated as hedging instruments for accounting purposes are utilized in the Partnership’s asset management activities. For derivative instruments not designated as hedging instruments, the gain or loss on the derivative is recognized currently in earnings.
Quantitative Disclosures Related to Derivative Instruments
The majority of natural gas physical purchases and sales not designated as hedges for accounting purposes are priced based on a monthly or daily index, and the fair value is subject to little or no market price risk. Natural gas physical sales volumes exceed natural gas physical purchase volumes due to the marketing of natural gas volumes purchased via the Partnership’s processing contracts, which are not derivative instruments.
As of December 31, 2016 and 2015, the Partnership had the following derivative instruments that were not designated as hedging instruments for accounting purposes:

| December 31, 2016 |  | December 31, 2015
| Gross Notional Volume
| Purchases |  | Sales |  | Purchases |  | Sales
Natural gas— TBtu(1) |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Financial fixed futures/swaps | 2 |  |  | 29 |  |  | 1 |  |  | 37 |
Financial basis futures/swaps | 2 |  |  | 30 |  |  | 4 |  |  | 38 |
Physical purchases/sales | 1 |  |  | 25 |  |  | 2 |  |  | 51 |
Crude oil (for condensate)— MBbl(2) |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Financial futures/swaps | — |  |  | 540 |  |  | — |  |  | 506 |
Natural gas liquids— MBbl(3) |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Financial futures/swaps | 60 |  |  | 1,133 |  |  | 75 |  |  | 1,011 |

____________________

(1) | As of December 31, 2016, 100% of the natural gas contracts have durations of one year or less. As of December 31, 2015, 97.7% of the natural gas contracts had durations of one year or less and 2.3% had durations of more than one year and less than two years.

(2) | As of December 31, 2016 and 2015, 100% of the crude oil (for condensate) contracts have durations of one year or less.

(3) | As of December 31, 2016 and 2015, 100% of the natural gas liquid contracts have durations of one year or less.

32

Exhibit 99.05
Balance Sheet Presentation Related to Derivative Instruments
The fair value of the derivative instruments that are presented in the Partnership’s Consolidated Balance Sheet at December 31, 2016 and 2015 that were not designated as hedging instruments for accounting purposes are as follows:

|  |  | December 31, 2016 |  | December 31, 2015
|  |  | Fair Value
Instrument | Balance Sheet Location |  | Assets |  | Liabilities |  | Assets |  | Liabilities
|  |  | (In millions)
Natural gas |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Financial futures/swaps | Other Current |  | $ | 2 |  |  | $ | 22 |  |  | $ | 17 |  |  | $ | 3 |
Physical purchases/sales | Other Current |  | — |  |  | 1 |  |  | 1 |  |  | — |
Crude oil (for condensate) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Financial futures/swaps | Other Current |  | — |  |  | 3 |  |  | 9 |  |  | — |
Natural gas liquids |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Financial futures/swaps | Other Current |  | — |  |  | 8 |  |  | 4 |  |  | — |
Total gross derivatives (1) |  |  | $ | 2 |  |  | $ | 34 |  |  | $ | 31 |  |  | $ | 3 |

_____________________

(1) | See Note 11 for a reconciliation of the Partnership’s total derivatives fair value to the Partnership’s Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2016 and 2015.

Income Statement Presentation Related to Derivative Instruments
The following table presents the effect of derivative instruments on the Partnership’s Consolidated Statements of Income for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014:

| Amounts Recognized in Income
| Year Ended December 31,
| 2016 |  | 2015 |  | 2014
| (In millions)
Natural gas financial futures/swaps gains (losses) | $ | (19 | ) |  | $ | 26 |  |  | $ | 37 |
Natural gas physical purchases/sales gains (losses) | (7 | ) |  | (9 | ) |  | 1 |
Crude oil (for condensate) financial futures/swaps gains (losses) | (4 | ) |  | 12 |  |  | 9 |
Natural gas liquids financial futures/swaps gains (losses) | (13 | ) |  | 10 |  |  | 2 |
Total | $ | (43 | ) |  | $ | 39 |  |  | $ | 49 |

For derivatives not designated as hedges in the tables above, amounts recognized in income for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, if any, are reported in Product sales.
The following table presents the components of gain (loss) on derivative activity in the Partnership’s Consolidated Statements of Income for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014:

| Year Ended December 31,
| 2016 |  | 2015 |  | 2014
| (In millions)
Change in fair value of derivatives | $ | (60 | ) |  | $ | (8 | ) |  | $ | 38 |
Realized gain on derivatives | 17 |  |  | 47 |  |  | 11 |
Gain (loss) on derivative activity | $ | (43 | ) |  | $ | 39 |  |  | $ | 49 |

Credit-Risk Related Contingent Features in Derivative Instruments
Based upon the Partnership’s senior unsecured debt rating with Moody’s Investors Services or Standard & Poor’s Ratings Services, the Partnership could be required to provide credit assurances to third parties, which could include letters of credit or cash collateral to satisfy its obligation under its financial and physical contracts relating to derivative instruments that are in a net
33

Exhibit 99.05
liability position. As of December 31, 2016, under these obligations, $3 million of cash collateral has been posted. Based on positions as of December 31, 2016, there was no additional collateral required to be posted by the Partnership.
(13) Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information
The following table provides information regarding supplemental cash flow information:

| Year Ended December 31,
| 2016 |  | 2015 |  | 2014
| (In millions)
Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information: |  |  |  |  |
Cash Payments: |  |  |  |  |
Interest, net of capitalized interest | $ | 105 |  |  | $ | 85 |  |  | $ | 77 |
Income taxes, net of refunds | — |  |  | 1 |  |  | 1 |
Non-cash transactions: |  |  |  |  |
Accounts payable related to capital expenditures | 18 |  |  | 52 |  |  | 93 |
Issuance of common units upon interest acquisition of SESH (Note 9) | — |  |  | 1 |  |  | 161 |

The following table reconciles cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash on the Consolidated Balance Sheets to cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash on the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows:

| 2016
| (In millions)
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 6 |
Restricted cash | 17 |
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash shown in the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows | $ | 23 |

(14) Related Party Transactions
The material related party transactions with CenterPoint Energy, OGE Energy and their respective subsidiaries are summarized below. There were no material related party transactions with other affiliates.
Transportation and Storage Agreements
Transportation and Storage Agreements with CenterPoint Energy
EGT provides the following services to CenterPoint Energy’s LDCs in Arkansas, Louisiana, Oklahoma and Northeast Texas: (1) firm transportation with seasonal contract demand, (2) firm storage, (3) no notice transportation with associated storage and (4) maximum rate firm transportation. The first three services are in effect through March 31, 2021, and will remain in effect from year to year thereafter unless either party provides 180 days’ written notice prior to the contract termination date. The maximum rate firm transportation is in effect through March 31, 2018. MRT provides firm transportation and firm storage services to CenterPoint Energy’s LDCs under agreements that are in effect through May 15, 2018, but will continue year to year thereafter unless either party provides twelve months’ written notice prior to the contract termination date.
In 2015, EGT relocated a portion of its pipeline in Arkansas to improve reliability and increase capacity by constructing an approximately 28.5 mile new pipeline segment and abandoning approximately 34.2 miles of existing pipelines segments. In connection with the project, EGT sold an approximately 12.4 mile pipeline segment to CenterPoint Energy’s Arkansas LDC for its remaining book value of $1 million, and EGT reimbursed CenterPoint Energy’s Arkansas LDC approximately $7 million dollars for cost incurred in connecting the LDC to EGT’s new pipeline segment.
Transportation and Storage Agreement with OGE Energy
EOIT provides no-notice load-following transportation and storage services to OGE Energy. On March 17, 2014, EOIT entered into a transportation agreement with OGE Energy, with a primary term of May 1, 2014 through April 30, 2019. Following the primary term, the agreement will remain in effect from year to year thereafter unless either party provides notice of termination to the other party at least 180 days prior to the commencement of the succeeding annual period.
34

Exhibit 99.05
On December 6, 2016, EOIT entered into a transportation agreement with OGE Energy, with a primary term expected to begin in late 2018 and extend for 20 years. In connection with the agreement, an approximately 80 mile pipeline will be built to serve OGE Energy’s Muskogee Power Plant.
Gas Sales and Purchases Transactions
The Partnership sells natural gas volumes to affiliates of CenterPoint Energy and OGE Energy or purchase natural gas volumes from affiliates of CenterPoint Energy through a combination of forward, monthly and daily transactions. The Partnership enters into these physical natural gas transactions in the normal course of business based upon relevant market prices.
The Partnership’s revenues from affiliated companies accounted for 7%, 7% and 6% of revenues during the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively.
Amounts of revenues from affiliated companies included in the Partnership’s Consolidated Statements of Income are summarized as follows:

| Year Ended December 31,
| 2016 |  | 2015 |  | 2014
| (In millions)
Gas transportation and storage service revenue — CenterPoint Energy | $ | 110 |  |  | $ | 110 |  |  | $ | 112 |
Natural gas product sales — CenterPoint Energy | 1 |  |  | 7 |  |  | 22 |
Gas transportation and storage service revenue — OGE Energy | 36 |  |  | 37 |  |  | 39 |
Natural gas product sales — OGE Energy | 12 |  |  | 8 |  |  | 13 |
Total revenues — affiliated companies | $ | 159 |  |  | $ | 162 |  |  | $ | 186 |

Amounts of natural gas purchased from affiliated companies included in the Partnership’s Consolidated Statements of Income are summarized as follows:

| Year Ended December 31,
| 2016 |  | 2015 |  | 2014
| (In millions)
Cost of natural gas purchases — CenterPoint Energy | $ | — |  |  | $ | 2 |  |  | $ | 2 |
Cost of natural gas purchases — OGE Energy | 14 |  |  | 15 |  |  | 19 |
Total cost of natural gas purchases — affiliated companies | $ | 14 |  |  | $ | 17 |  |  | $ | 21 |

Corporate services and seconded employee expense
For the year ended December 31, 2014, the Partnership’s employees were seconded by CenterPoint Energy and OGE Energy, and the Partnership reimbursed each of CenterPoint Energy and OGE Energy for all employee costs under the seconding agreements until the seconded employees transition from CenterPoint Energy and OGE Energy to the Partnership. The Partnership transitioned seconded employees from CenterPoint Energy and OGE Energy to the Partnership effective January 1, 2015, except for certain employees who are participants under OGE Energy’s defined benefit and retiree medical plans, who will remain seconded to the Partnership, subject to certain termination rights of the Partnership and OGE Energy. The Partnership’s reimbursement of OGE Energy for seconded employee costs arising out of OGE Energy’s defined benefit and retiree medical plans is fixed at $6 million in 2016, $5 million in 2017, and at actual cost subject to a cap of $5 million in 2018 and thereafter, in the event of continued secondment.
Under the terms of the MFA, the Partnership receives services and support functions from each of CenterPoint Energy and OGE Energy under service agreements for an initial term that ended on April 30, 2016. The service agreements automatically extend year-to-year at the end of the initial term, unless terminated by the Partnership with at least 90 days’ notice prior to the end of any extension. Additionally, the Partnership may terminate these service agreements at any time with 180 days’ notice, if approved by the Board of Enable GP. The Partnership reimburses CenterPoint Energy and OGE Energy for these services up to annual caps, which for 2016 are $7 million and $6 million, respectively.
35

Exhibit 99.05
On November 1, 2016, the Partnership entered into a new lease with an affiliate of CenterPoint Energy pursuant to which the Partnership leases office space in Shreveport, Louisiana. The term of the lease was effective on October 1, 2016 and extends through December 31, 2019. The Partnership expects to incur approximately $3 million in rent and maintenance expenses through the end of the initial term of the lease. Prior to October 1, 2016, CenterPoint Energy provided the office space in Shreveport, Louisiana under the services agreement. As of December 31, 2016, CenterPoint Energy continues to provide office and data center space to the Partnership in Houston, Texas under the services agreement.
Amounts charged to the Partnership by affiliates for seconded employees and corporate services, included primarily in Operation and maintenance expenses and General and administrative expenses in the Partnership’s Consolidated Statements of Income are as follows:

| Year Ended December 31,
| 2016 |  | 2015 |  | 2014
| (In millions)
Seconded Employee Costs - CenterPoint Energy | $ | — |  |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | 138 |
Corporate Services - CenterPoint Energy | 6 |  |  | 15 |  |  | 29 |
Seconded Employee Costs - OGE Energy | 29 |  |  | 35 |  |  | 105 |
Corporate Services - OGE Energy | 5 |  |  | 11 |  |  | 17 |
Total corporate services and seconded employees expense | $ | 40 |  |  | $ | 61 |  |  | $ | 289 |

Series A Preferred Units
On February 18, 2016, the Partnership completed the private placement of 14,520,000 Series A Preferred Units representing limited partner interests in the Partnership for a cash purchase price of $25.00 per Series A Preferred Unit, resulting in proceeds of $362 million, net of issuance costs. See Note 5 for further discussion of the Series A Preferred Units.
Notes payable
The Partnership had outstanding long-term notes payable—affiliated companies to CenterPoint Energy at December 31, 2015 of $363 million, which were scheduled to mature in 2017. On February 18, 2016, in connection with the private placement of the Series A Preferred Units, the Partnership redeemed the $363 million of notes payable—affiliated companies payable to a subsidiary of CenterPoint Energy.
The Partnership recorded affiliated interest expense to CenterPoint Energy on note payable—affiliated companies of $1 million, $8 million and $8 million during the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively.
(15) Commitments and Contingencies
Operating Lease Obligations. The Partnership has operating lease obligations expiring at various dates. Future minimum payments for noncancellable operating leases are as follows:

| Year Ended December 31,
| 2017 |  | 2018 |  | 2019 |  | 2020 |  | 2021 |  | After 2021 |  | Total
| (In millions)
Noncancellable operating leases | $ | 10 |  |  | $ | 4 |  |  | $ | 3 |  |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | 17 |

Total rental expense for all operating leases was $27 million, $32 million and $23 million during the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively.
The Partnership currently occupies 162,053 square feet of office space at its executive offices under a lease that expires June 30, 2019. The lease payments are $19 million over the lease term, which began April 1, 2012. This lease has rent escalations which increase after 5 years, and will further escalate after 10 years if the lease is renewed. These lease expenses are included in General and administrative expense in the Consolidated Statements of Income.
The Partnership currently has 78 compression service agreements, of which 40 agreements are on a month-to-month basis,
36

Exhibit 99.05
32 agreements will expire in 2017 and 6 agreements will expire in 2018. The Partnership also has 6 gas treating lease agreements, all of which are on a month-to-month basis. These lease expenses are reflected in Operation and maintenance expense in the Consolidated Statements of Income.
Legal, Regulatory and Other Matters
The Partnership is involved in legal, environmental, tax and regulatory proceedings before various courts, regulatory commissions and governmental agencies regarding matters arising in the ordinary course of business. Some of these proceedings involve substantial amounts. The Partnership regularly analyzes current information and, as necessary, provides accruals for probable liabilities on the eventual disposition of these matters. The Partnership does not expect the disposition of these matters to have a material adverse effect on its financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
(16) Income Taxes
37

Exhibit 99.05
The Partnership’s earnings are generally not subject to income tax (other than Texas state margin taxes and taxes associated with the Partnership’s corporate subsidiaries, Enable Midstream Services and Enable Muskogee Intrastate Transmission) and are taxable at the individual partner level. The Partnership and its subsidiaries are pass-through entities for federal income tax purposes. For these entities, all income, expenses, gains, losses and tax credits generated flow through to their owners and, accordingly, do not result in a provision for income taxes in the consolidated financial statements. Consequently, the Consolidated Statements of Income do not include an income tax provision (other than Texas state margin taxes and taxes associated with the Partnership’s corporate subsidiaries).
The items comprising income tax expense are as follows:

| Year Ended December 31,
| 2016 |  | 2015 |  | 2014
| (In millions)
Provision (benefit) for current income taxes |  |  |  |  |
Federal | $ | (1 | ) |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | — |
State | — |  |  | 1 |  |  | 1 |
Total provision (benefit) for current income taxes | (1 | ) |  | 1 |  |  | 1 |
Provision (benefit) for deferred income taxes, net |  |  |  |  |
Federal | $ | 3 |  |  | — |  |  | $ | — |
State | (1 | ) |  | (1 | ) |  | 1 |
Total provision (benefit) for deferred income taxes, net | 2 |  |  | (1 | ) |  | 1 |
Total income tax expense | $ | 1 |  |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | 2 |

The following schedule reconciles the statutory Federal income tax rate to the effective income tax rate:

| Year Ended December 31,
| 2016 |  | 2015 |  | 2014
| (In millions)
Income (loss) before income taxes | $ | 314 |  |  | $ | (771 | ) |  | $ | 535 |
Federal statutory rate | — | % |  | — | % |  | — | %
Expected federal income tax expense | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |
Increase in tax expense resulting from: |  |  |  |  |
State income taxes, net of federal income tax | 1 |  |  | — |  |  | 2 |
Total | 1 |  |  | — |  |  | 2 |
Total income tax expense | $ | 1 |  |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | 2 |
Effective tax rate | 0.3 | % |  | — | % |  | 0.4 | %

The components of Deferred Income Taxes as of December 31, 2016 and 2015 were as follows:

| December 31,
| 2016 |  | 2015
| (In millions)
Deferred tax assets: | $ | — |  |  | $ | — |
Deferred tax liabilities: |  |  |
Non-current: |  |  |
Depreciation | 7 |  |  | 9 |
Other | 3 |  |  | (1 | )
Total non-current deferred tax liabilities | 10 |  |  | 8 |
Accumulated deferred income taxes, net | $ | 10 |  |  | $ | 8 |

Uncertain Income Tax Positions
There were no unrecognized tax benefits as of December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014.
Tax Audits and Settlements
38

Exhibit 99.05
The federal income tax return of the Partnership has been audited through the 2013 tax year.
(17) Equity Based Compensation
Enable GP has adopted the Enable Midstream Partners, LP Long Term Incentive Plan (LTIP) for officers, directors and employees of the Partnership and its affiliates, including any individual who provides services to the Partnership as a seconded employee. The long-term incentive plan provides for the following types of awards: restricted units, phantom units, appreciations rights, option rights, cash incentive awards, performance units, distribution equivalent rights, and other awards denominated in, payable in, valued in or otherwise based on or related to common units.
The long-term incentive plan is administered by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors. With respect to any grant of equity as long-term incentive awards to our independent directors and our officers subject to reporting under Section 16 of the Exchange Act, the Compensation Committee makes recommendations to the Board of Directors and any such awards will only be effective upon the approval of the Board of Directors. The long-term incentive plan limits the number of units that may be delivered pursuant to vested awards to 13,100,000 common units, subject to proportionate adjustment in the event of unit splits and similar events. Common units cancelled, forfeited, expired or cash settled are available for delivery pursuant to other awards.
The Board of Directors may terminate or amend the long-term incentive plan at any time with respect to any units for which a grant has not yet been made, including amending the long-term incentive plan to increase the number of units that may be granted subject to the requirements of the exchange upon which the common units are listed at that time. However, no change in any outstanding grant may be made that would be adverse to the participant without the consent of the participant.
The following table summarizes the Partnership’s equity based compensation expense for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014 related to performance units, restricted units and phantom units for the Partnership’s employees and independent directors:

| Year Ended December 31,
| 2016 |  | 2015 |  | 2014
| (In millions)
Performance units | $ | 9 |  |  | $ | 3 |  |  | $ | 3 |
Restricted units | 3 |  |  | 7 |  |  | 10 |
Phantom units | 1 |  |  | 1 |  |  | 2 |
Total compensation expense | $ | 13 |  |  | $ | 11 |  |  | $ | 15 |

39

Exhibit 99.05
Performance Units
Awards of performance based phantom units (performance units) have been made under the LTIP in 2016, 2015 and 2014 to certain officers and employees providing services to the Partnership. Subject to the achievement of performance goals, the performance unit awards cliff vest three years from the grant date, with distribution equivalent rights paid at vesting. The performance goals for 2016, 2015 and 2014 awards are based on total unitholder return over a three calendar year performance cycle. Total unitholder return is based on the relative performance of the Partnership’s common units against a peer group. The performance unit awards have a payout from 0% to 200% of the target based on the level of achievement of the performance goal. Performance units awards are paid out in common units, with distribution equivalent rights paid in cash at vesting. Any unearned performance units are cancelled. Pay out requires the confirmation of the achievement of the performance level by the Compensation Committee. Prior to vesting, performance units are subject to forfeiture if the recipient’s employment with the Partnership is terminated for any reason other than death, disability, retirement or termination other than for cause within two years of a change in control. In the event of retirement, a participant will receive a pro rated payment based on the target performance, rather than actual performance, of the performance goals during the award cycle. Performance unit awards are classified as equity on the Partnership’s Consolidated Balance Sheet.
The fair value of each performance unit award was estimated on the grant date using a lattice-based valuation model. The valuation information factored into the model includes the expected distribution yield, expected price volatility, risk-free interest rate and the probable outcome of the market condition over the expected life of the performance units. Compensation expense for each performance unit award is a fixed amount determined at the grant date fair value and is recognized over the three-year award cycle regardless of whether performance units are awarded at the end of the award cycle. Distributions are accumulated and paid at vesting and, therefore, are included in the fair value calculation of the performance unit award. Due to the short trading history of the Partnership’s common units, the expected price volatility for the awards granted in 2016 is based on two years of daily stock price observations, combined with the average of the one-year volatility of the applicable peer group companies used to determine the total unitholder return ranking. The expected price volatility for the awards granted in 2015 is based on one year of daily stock price observations, combined with the average of the two-year volatility of the applicable peer group companies used to determine the total unitholder return ranking. The expected price volatility for the awards granted in 2014 is based on the average of the two-year volatility of the applicable peer group companies used to determine the total unitholder return ranking. The risk-free interest rate for the performance unit grants is based on the three-year U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of the grant. The expected life of the units is based on the non-vested period since inception of the award cycle. There are no post-vesting restrictions related to the Partnership’s performance units. The number of performance units granted based on total unitholder return and the assumptions used to calculate the grant date fair value of the performance units based on total unitholder return are shown in the following table.

| 2016 |  | 2015 |  | 2014
Number of units granted | 1,235,429 |  |  | 501,474 |  |  | 563,963 |
Fair value of units granted | $10.42 - $27.77 |  |  | $ | 16.59 |  |  | $ | 29.61 |
Expected price volatility | 43.2% - 46.0% |  |  | 27.6 | % |  | 22.2 | %
Risk-free interest rate | 0.86% - 0.90% |  |  | 0.99 | % |  | 0.83 | %
Expected life of units (in years) | 3.00 |  |  | 3.00 |  |  | 3.00 |

Phantom Units
Awards of phantom units have been made under the LTIP in 2016, 2015 and 2014 to certain officers and employees providing services to the Partnership and certain directors of Enable GP. In 2014, 100,000 phantom units were awarded to certain officers and employees providing services to the Partnership that vested on the first anniversary of the grant date with distribution equivalent rights paid at vesting. Also in 2014, 6,718 phantom units were awarded to the independent directors for their service as directors that vested on the first anniversary of the grant date with distribution equivalent rights paid during the vesting period. In 2015, 9,817 phantom units were granted to employees providing services to the Partnership that vest on the first, second or third anniversary of the grant date with distribution equivalent rights paid during the vesting period. In April 2016, 653,286 phantom units were awarded to certain officers and employees providing services to the Partnership that vest on the first, second or third anniversary of the award with distribution equivalent rights paid during the vesting period. Phantom units awards are paid out in common units, with distributions equivalent rights paid in cash. Phantom units cliff-vest at the end of the vesting period. Any unearned phantom units are cancelled. Prior to vesting, phantom units are subject to forfeiture if the recipient’s employment with the Partnership is terminated for any reason other than death, disability, retirement or termination other than for cause within two years of a change in control. Phantom unit awards are classified as equity on the Partnership’s Consolidated Balance Sheet.
40

Exhibit 99.05
The fair value of the phantom units was based on the closing market price of the Partnership’s common unit on the grant date. Compensation expense for the phantom unit is a fixed amount determined at the grant date fair value and is recognized as services are rendered by employees over the vesting period. Distributions on phantom units are either accumulated and paid at vesting or paid during the vesting period and, therefore, are included in the fair value calculation. The expected life of the phantom unit is based on the applicable vesting period. The number of phantom units granted and the grant date fair value are shown in the following table.

| 2016 |  | 2015 |  | 2014
Phantom units granted | 653,286 |  |  | 9,817 |  |  | 106,718 |
Fair value of phantom units granted | $8.12 - $15.30 |  |  | $ | 12.70 |  |  | $23.16 - $23.70 |

Restricted Units
Awards of restricted units were made under the LTIP in 2015 and 2014 to certain officers and employees providing services to the Partnership and certain directors of Enable GP. These restricted unit awards cliff vest on the first, second, third or fourth anniversary of grant date, with distribution equivalent rights paid during the vesting period. Restricted units are outstanding and issued common units that cannot be sold, assigned, transferred or pledged by the recipient prior to vesting. Any unearned restricted units are cancelled. Prior to vesting, restricted units are subject to forfeiture if the recipient ceases to render substantial services to the Partnership for any reason other than death, disability, retirement or termination other than for cause within two years of a change in control.
In 2014, 375,000 restricted units were granted to Lynn Bourdon, who was then the Chief Executive Officer of Enable GP, of which 40% vested on August 1, 2014, 20% vested on February 1, 2015 and 40% vested on July 15, 2015; 150,000 restricted units to Mr. Bourdon, of which 50% vested on May 29, 2015 and 50% was forfeited upon his departure; 137,500 restricted units were granted to Rodney J. Sailor, who was then the Chief Financial Officer of Enable GP, of which 45.46% vested on March 1, 2015 and 54.54% vested on March 1, 2016; 25,000 restricted units were granted to Mr. Sailor, which vest four years from the grant date; and 304,901 restricted units were granted to officers and employees providing services to the Partnership which vest on the first, second, third or fourth anniversary of grant date. In 2015, 279,677 restricted units were granted to officers and employees providing services to the Partnership which vest on the first, second, or third anniversary of grant date. Prior to vesting, each share of restricted stock is subject to forfeiture if the recipient ceases to render substantial services to the Partnership for any reason other than death, disability or retirement. During the restriction period these units may not be sold, assigned, transferred or pledged and are subject to a risk of forfeiture. Restricted unit awards are classified as equity on the Partnership’s Consolidated Balance Sheet.
The fair value of the restricted units was based on the closing market price of the Partnership’s common unit on the grant date. Compensation expense for the restricted units is a fixed amount determined at the grant date fair value and is recognized as services are rendered by employees over a vesting period, as defined in the agreements. Distributions are paid as declared prior to vesting and, therefore, are included in the fair value calculation. After payment, distributions are not subject to forfeiture. The expected life of the restricted units is based on the non-vested period since inception of the award cycle.
The number of restricted units granted related to the Partnership’s employees and the grant date fair value are shown in the following table.

| 2015 |  | 2014
Restricted units granted on April 16, 2014 to the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Enable GP | — |  |  | 687,500 |
Fair value of restricted units granted | $ | — |  |  | $ | 22.60 |
Restricted units granted to the Partnership’s employees | 279,677 |  |  | 304,901 |
Fair value of restricted units granted | $16.75 - $19.18 |  |  | $23.56 - $25.50 |

Other Awards
In 2016 and 2015, the Board of Directors granted 14,914 and 17,384 common units, respectively, to the independent directors of Enable GP, for their service as directors, which vested immediately. The fair value of the common units were based on the closing market price of the Partnership’s common unit on the grant date.
41

Exhibit 99.05

| 2016 |  | 2015
Common units granted | 14,914 |  |  | 17,384 |
Fair value of common units granted | $ | 15.35 |  |  | $ | 11.12 |

Units Outstanding
A summary of the activity for the Partnership’s performance units, restricted units and phantom units as of December 31, 2016 and changes during 2016 are shown in the following table.

| Performance Units |  | Restricted Stock |  | Phantom Units
| Number of Units |  | Weighted Average Grant-Date Fair Value, Per Unit |  | Number of Units |  | Weighted Average Grant-Date Fair Value, Per Unit |  | Number of Units |  | Weighted Average Grant-Date Fair Value, Per Unit
| (In millions, except unit data)
Units Outstanding at 12/31/2015 | 814,510 |  |  | $ | 22.16 |  |  | 581,772 |  |  | $ | 21.04 |  |  | 9,817 |  |  | $ | 12.70 |
Granted(1) | 1,235,429 |  |  | 10.80 |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 653,286 |  |  | 8.45 |
Vested | (6,427 | ) |  | 20.77 |  |  | (125,843 | ) |  | 22.78 |  |  | (5,594 | ) |  | 12.44 |
Forfeited | (74,405 | ) |  | 15.94 |  |  | (62,934 | ) |  | 19.43 |  |  | (13,905 | ) |  | 8.12 |
Units Outstanding at 12/31/2016 | 1,969,107 |  |  | 15.27 |  |  | 392,995 |  |  | 20.74 |  |  | 643,604 |  |  | 8.49 |
Aggregate Intrinsic Value of Units Outstanding at 12/31/2016 | $ | 31 |  |  |  |  | $ | 6 |  |  |  |  | $ | 10 |  |  |

_____________________

(1) | For performance units, this represents the target number of performance units granted. The actual number of performance units earned, if any, is dependent upon performance and may range from 0 percent to 200 percent of the target.

A summary of the Partnership’s performance, restricted and phantom units’ aggregate intrinsic value (market value at vesting date) and fair value of units vested (market value at date of grant) during the year ended December 31, 2016 are shown in the following table.

| December 31, 2016
| Performance Units |  | Restricted Stock |  | Phantom Units
| (In millions)
Aggregate Intrinsic Value of Units Vested | $ | — |  |  | $ | 1 |  |  | $ | — |
Fair Value of Units Vested | — |  |  | 3 |  |  | — |

Unrecognized Compensation Cost
A summary of the Partnership’s unrecognized compensation cost for its non-vested performance units, restricted units and phantom units, and the weighted-average periods over which the compensation cost is expected to be recognized are shown in the following table.

| December 31, 2016
| Unrecognized Compensation Cost (In millions) |  | Weighted Average to be Recognized (In years)
Performance Units | $ | 15 |  |  | 1.81
Restricted Units | 2 |  |  | 1.12
Phantom Units | 4 |  |  | 2.20
Total | $ | 21 |  |  |

As of December 31, 2016, there were 9,307,350 units available for issuance under the long term incentive plan.
42

Exhibit 99.05
(18) Reportable Segments
The Partnership’s determination of reportable segments considers the strategic operating units under which it manages sales, allocates resources and assesses performance of various products and services to wholesale or retail customers in differing regulatory environments. The accounting policies of the reportable segments are the same as those described in the summary of significant accounting policies described in Note 1. The Partnership uses operating income as the measure of profit or loss for its reportable segments.
The Partnership’s assets and operations are organized into two reportable segments: (i) gathering and processing, which primarily provides natural gas gathering, processing and fractionation services and crude oil gathering for our producer customers, and (ii) transportation and storage, which provides interstate and intrastate natural gas pipeline transportation and storage service primarily to natural gas producers, utilities and industrial customers.
Financial data for reportable segments are as follows:

Year Ended December 31, 2016 | Gathering and Processing |  | Transportation and Storage (1) |  | Eliminations |  | Total
| (In millions)
Product sales | $ | 1,081 |  |  | $ | 479 |  |  | $ | (388 | ) |  | $ | 1,172 |
Service revenue | 559 |  |  | 545 |  |  | (4 | ) |  | 1,100 |
Total Revenues(2) | 1,640 |  |  | 1,024 |  |  | (392 | ) |  | 2,272 |
Cost of natural gas and natural gas liquids | 915 |  |  | 492 |  |  | (390 | ) |  | 1,017 |
Operation and maintenance, General and administrative | 276 |  |  | 191 |  |  | (2 | ) |  | 465 |
Depreciation and amortization | 212 |  |  | 126 |  |  | — |  |  | 338 |
Impairments | 9 |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 9 |
Taxes other than income tax | 32 |  |  | 26 |  |  | — |  |  | 58 |
Operating income | $ | 196 |  |  | $ | 189 |  |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | 385 |
Total assets | $ | 7,453 |  |  | $ | 4,963 |  |  | $ | (1,204 | ) |  | $ | 11,212 |
Capital expenditures | $ | 312 |  |  | $ | 71 |  |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | 383 |

Year Ended December 31, 2015 | Gathering and Processing |  | Transportation and Storage (1) |  | Eliminations |  | Total
| (In millions)
Product sales | $ | 1,118 |  |  | $ | 590 |  |  | $ | (374 | ) |  | $ | 1,334 |
Service revenue | 545 |  |  | 542 |  |  | (3 | ) |  | 1,084 |
Total Revenues(2) | 1,663 |  |  | 1,132 |  |  | (377 | ) |  | 2,418 |
Cost of natural gas and natural gas liquids | 908 |  |  | 565 |  |  | (376 | ) |  | 1,097 |
Operation and maintenance, General and administrative | 293 |  |  | 230 |  |  | (1 | ) |  | 522 |
Depreciation and amortization | 195 |  |  | 123 |  |  | — |  |  | 318 |
Impairments | 543 |  |  | 591 |  |  | — |  |  | 1,134 |
Taxes other than income tax | 30 |  |  | 29 |  |  | — |  |  | 59 |
Operating loss | $ | (306 | ) |  | $ | (406 | ) |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | (712 | )
Total assets | $ | 7,536 |  |  | $ | 4,976 |  |  | $ | (1,286 | ) |  | $ | 11,226 |
Capital expenditures | $ | 839 |  |  | $ | 110 |  |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | 949 |

43

Exhibit 99.05

Year Ended December 31, 2014 | Gathering and Processing |  | Transportation and Storage (1) |  | Eliminations |  | Total
| (In millions)
Product sales | $ | 1,907 |  |  | $ | 1,009 |  |  | $ | (616 | ) |  | $ | 2,300 |
Service revenue | 517 |  |  | 568 |  |  | (18 | ) |  | 1,067 |
Total Revenues(2) | 2,424 |  |  | 1,577 |  |  | (634 | ) |  | 3,367 |
Cost of natural gas and natural gas liquids | 1,585 |  |  | 961 |  |  | (632 | ) |  | 1,914 |
Operation and maintenance, General and administrative | 297 |  |  | 232 |  |  | (2 | ) |  | 527 |
Depreciation and amortization | 160 |  |  | 116 |  |  | — |  |  | 276 |
Impairments | 8 |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 8 |
Taxes other than income tax | 25 |  |  | 31 |  |  | — |  |  | 56 |
Operating income | $ | 349 |  |  | $ | 237 |  |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | 586 |
Total Assets | $ | 8,356 |  |  | $ | 5,493 |  |  | $ | (2,012 | ) |  | $ | 11,837 |
Capital expenditures | $ | 740 |  |  | $ | 103 |  |  | $ | (6 | ) |  | $ | 837 |

_____________________

(1) | Equity in earnings of equity method affiliate is included in Other Income (Expense) on the Consolidated Statements of Income, and is not included in the table above. See Note 9 for discussion regarding ownership interest in SESH and related equity earnings included in the transportation and storage segment for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014.

(2) | The Partnership had no external customers accounting for 10% or more of revenues in periods shown. See Note 14 for revenues from affiliated companies.

44