XML 31 R21.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT
v3.19.2

CONTINGENT LIABILITIES AND OTHER MATTERS | 6 Months Ended
--- | ---
Jun. 29, 2019
Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract] |
CONTINGENT LIABILITIES AND OTHER MATTERS | CONTINGENT LIABILITIES AND OTHER MATTERS General Numerous claims, complaints and proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business have been asserted or are pending against us or certain of our subsidiaries (collectively, “claims”). These claims relate to litigation matters (e.g., class actions and contracts, intellectual property, and competitive claims), environmental matters, product liability matters (predominately associated with alleged exposure to asbestos-containing materials), and other risk management matters (e.g., general liability, automobile, and workers’ compensation claims). Additionally, we may become subject to other claims of which we are currently unaware, which may be significant, or the claims of which we are aware may result in our incurring significantly greater loss than we anticipate. While we (and our subsidiaries) maintain property, cargo, auto, product, general liability, environmental, and directors’ and officers’ liability insurance and have acquired rights under similar policies in connection with acquisitions that we believe cover a significant portion of these claims, this insurance may be insufficient or unavailable (e.g., in the case of insurer insolvency) to protect us against potential loss exposures. Also, while we believe we are entitled to indemnification from third parties for some of these claims, these rights may be insufficient or unavailable to protect us against potential loss exposures. Our recorded liabilities related to these matters totaled $600.9 (including $556.7 for asbestos product liability matters) and $631.7 (including $587.5 for asbestos product liability matters) at June 29, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively. Of these amounts, $573.2 and $600.3 are included in “Other long-term liabilities” within our condensed consolidated balance sheets at June 29, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively, with the remainder included in “Accrued expenses.” The liabilities we record for these claims are based on a number of assumptions, including historical claims and payment experience and, with respect to asbestos claims, actuarial estimates of the future period during which additional claims are reasonably foreseeable. While we base our assumptions on facts currently known to us, they entail inherently subjective judgments and uncertainties. As a result, our current assumptions for estimating these liabilities may not prove accurate, and we may be required to adjust these liabilities in the future, which could result in charges to earnings. These variances relative to current expectations could have a material impact on our financial position and results of operations. Our asbestos-related claims are typical in certain of the industries in which we operate or pertain to legacy businesses we no longer operate. It is not unusual in these cases for fifty or more corporate entities to be named as defendants. We vigorously defend these claims, many of which are dismissed without payment, and the significant majority of costs related to these claims have historically been paid pursuant to our insurance arrangements. During the six months ended June 29, 2019, our payments for asbestos-related matters, net of insurance recoveries of $26.6, were $6.3. During the six months ended June 30, 2018, our payments for asbestos-related matters, net of insurance recoveries of $19.4, were $7.8. A significant increase in claims, costs and/or issues with existing insurance coverage (e.g., dispute with or insolvency of insurer(s)) could have a material adverse impact on our share of future payments related to these matters, and, as such, have a material impact on our financial position, results of operations and cash flows. We have recorded insurance recovery assets associated with the asbestos product liability matters, with such amounts totaling $516.4 and $541.9 at June 29, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively, and included in “Other assets” within our condensed consolidated balance sheets. These assets represent amounts that we believe we are or will be entitled to recover under agreements we have with insurance companies. The assets we record for these insurance recoveries are based on a number of assumptions, including the continued solvency of the insurers, and are subject to a variety of uncertainties. Our current assumptions for estimating these assets may not prove accurate, and we may be required to adjust these assets in the future, which could result in additional charges to earnings. These variances relative to current expectations could have a material impact on our financial position and results of operations. During the three and six months ended June 29, 2019 and June 30, 2018, there were no changes in estimates associated with the liabilities and assets related to our asbestos product liability matters. Large Power Projects in South Africa Overview - Since 2008, our South African subsidiary, DBT, has been executing contracts on two large power projects in South Africa (Kusile and Medupi). Over such time, the business environment surrounding these projects has been difficult, as DBT, along with many other contractors on the projects, have experienced delays, cost over-runs, and various other challenges associated with a complex set of contractual relationships among the end customer, prime contractors, various subcontractors (including DBT and its subcontractors), and various suppliers. DBT has completed the majority of its contractual scope of work on the projects and we believe its remaining scope of work will be substantially complete by the end of 2019. The challenges related to these projects have resulted in (i) significant adjustments to our revenue and cost estimates for the projects, (ii) DBT’s submission of numerous change orders to the prime contractors, (iii) various claims and disputes between DBT and other parties involved with the projects (e.g., prime contractors, subcontractors, suppliers, etc.), and (iv) the possibility that DBT may become subject to additional claims, which could be significant. It is possible that some outstanding claims may not be resolved until after the prime contractors complete their scopes of work. Our future financial position, operating results, and cash flows could be materially impacted by the resolution of current and any future claims. On June 28, 2019, DBT reached an agreement with Alstom/GE, one of the prime contractors on the projects, to, among other things, settle all material outstanding claims between the parties (other than certain pass-through claims relating to third parties), including the liquidated damages claims made by Alstom/GE, which are further discussed below. In addition, Alstom/GE returned bank bonds totaling $11.5 to DBT. In connection with the agreement, we reduced revenues (and operating income) by $6.0 during the three months ended June 29, 2019. Claims by DBT - DBT has made numerous claims against the other prime contractor on the projects, Mitsubishi-Hitachi Power Systems Africa (PTY) LTD (“MHPSA”), including claims totaling South African Rand 1,033.3 (or $72.6) that have been submitted to dispute adjudication processes as required under the relevant contracts. As of June 29, 2019, the recorded cumulative revenues related to these claims, as well as certain unapproved change orders, totaled $10.8 (see Note 4 for further discussion). In addition to existing asserted claims, DBT may have additional claims and rights to recovery based on its remaining performance under the contracts with, and actions taken by, MHPSA. The amounts DBT may recover for current and potential future claims against MHPSA are not currently known given (i) the extent of current and potential future claims by MHPSA against DBT (see below for further discussion) and (ii) the unpredictable nature of any dispute resolution processes that may occur in connection with these current and potential future claims. Claims by Prime Contractors - In February and March of 2019, DBT received notifications of intent to claim liquidated damages totaling South African Rand 277.5 (or $19.5) from Alstom/GE alleging that DBT failed to meet certain project milestones related to construction of the air-cooled condensers on the Kusile project. As of the end of the first quarter of 2019, no loss had been recorded in our condensed consolidated financial statements with respect to these claims. As indicated above, these claims were settled in connection with a June 28, 2019 agreement between DBT and Alstom/GE. In April and July 2019, DBT received notifications of intent to claim liquidated damages totaling South African Rand 264.4 (or $18.6) and South African Rand 142.8 ($10.0), respectively, from MHPSA alleging that DBT failed to meet certain project milestones related to the construction of the filters for both the Kusile and Medupi projects. DBT has numerous defenses against these claims and, thus, we do not believe that DBT has a probable loss associated with these claims. As such, no loss has been recorded in the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements with respect to these claims. Although it is reasonably possible that some loss may be incurred in connection with these claims, we currently are unable to estimate the potential loss or range of potential loss. On February 26, 2019, DBT received notification of an interim claim consisting of both direct and consequential damages from MHPSA alleging, among other things, that DBT (i) provided defective product and (ii) failed to meet certain project milestones. We believe the notification is unsubstantiated and the vast majority of the claimed damages are prohibited under the relevant contracts. Therefore, we believe any loss for these claimed damages is remote. For the remainder of the claims, which largely appear to be direct in nature (approximately South African Rand 948.0 or $66.6), DBT has numerous other defenses and, thus, we believe that DBT’s probable loss associated with these claims has been appropriately reflected in provisions established in prior periods and included in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets. It is reasonably possible that DBT’s ultimate loss could exceed the provisions that have been recorded, but we currently cannot estimate the potential additional loss, or the range of the potential additional loss, associated with these claims due to the (i) lack of support provided by MPHSA for these claims; (ii) complexity of contractual relationships between the end customer, prime contractor, and DBT; (iii) legal interpretation of the contract provisions and application of South African common law to the contracts; and (iv) unpredictable nature of any dispute resolution processes that may occur in connection with these claims. Bank Bonds and Guarantees - In connection with these projects, we have issued, in favor of the prime contractors, and after considering the bonds that were returned in connection with the June 28, 2019 agreement between DBT and Alstom/GE, bonds totaling $68.9 (including $23.0 with more stringent payment terms). In the event that the prime contractors were to receive payment on a portion, or all, of these bonds, we would be required to reimburse the bank. In addition to these bonds, SPX Corporation has guaranteed DBT’s performance on these projects to the prime contractors. Claims by Subcontractor - On October 30, 2018, a non-governmental business adjudicator in South Africa provided a decision on certain claims made against DBT by one of its subcontractors. As part of its decision, the adjudicator concluded that the subcontractor was entitled to payment of South African Rand 256.0 (or $18.0). We believe this decision is invalid on numerous bases. Specifically, we believe, among other things, that these and other claims were previously settled and satisfied by way of a 2015 amendment to the contract between DBT and the subcontractor. Therefore, DBT is pursuing all available legal recourse in the matter, and the matter has been referred to both court proceedings and an arbitration process that are scheduled to occur in the latter half of the third quarter of 2019. Based on the reasons stated above, we have concluded that it is not probable that a loss has been incurred with respect to this matter and, therefore, a loss has not been recorded in the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements. Noncontrolling Interest in South African Subsidiary DBT has a Black Economic Empowerment shareholder (the “BEE Partner”) that holds a 25.1% noncontrolling interest in DBT. Under the terms of the shareholder agreement between the BEE Partner and SPX Technologies (PTY) LTD (“SPX Technologies”), the BEE Partner had the option to put its ownership interest in DBT to SPX Technologies, the majority shareholder of DBT, at a redemption amount determined in accordance with the terms of the shareholder agreement (the “Put Option”). The BEE Partner notified SPX Technologies of its intention to exercise the Put Option and, on July 6, 2016, an Arbitration Tribunal declared that the BEE Partner was entitled to South African Rand 287.3 in connection with the exercise of the Put Option, having not considered an amount due from the BEE Partner under a promissory note of South African Rand 30.3 held by SPX Technologies. As a result, we have reflected the net redemption amount of South African Rand 257.0 (or $18.0 and $17.7 at June 29, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively) within “Accrued expenses” on our condensed consolidated balance sheets, with the related offset recorded to “Paid-in capital” and “Accumulated other comprehensive income.” In August 2016, SPX Technologies applied to the High Court of South Africa (the “Court”) to have the Arbitration Tribunal’s ruling set aside. On January 22, 2018, the Court ruled in SPX Technologies’ favor and set aside the Arbitration Tribunal’s ruling. The BEE Partner appealed the Court’s decision and SPX Technologies continues to assert all legal defenses available to it. We expect the South African Supreme Court of Appeals to hear this matter in the latter half of the third quarter of 2019. Litigation Matters We are subject to other legal matters that arise in the normal course of business. We believe these matters are either without merit or of a kind that should not have a material effect, individually or in the aggregate, on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows; however, we cannot assure you that these proceedings or claims will not have a material effect on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows. Environmental Matters Our operations and properties are subject to federal, state, local and foreign regulatory requirements relating to environmental protection. It is our policy to comply fully with all applicable requirements. As part of our effort to comply, we have a comprehensive environmental compliance program that includes environmental audits conducted by internal and external independent professionals, as well as regular communications with our operating units regarding environmental compliance requirements and anticipated regulations. Based on current information, we believe that our operations are in substantial compliance with applicable environmental laws and regulations, and we are not aware of any violations that could have a material effect, individually or in the aggregate, on our business, financial condition, and results of operations or cash flows. As of June 29, 2019, we had liabilities for site investigation and/or remediation at 29 sites (28 sites at December 31, 2018) that we own or control, or formerly owned and controlled. In addition, while we believe that we maintain adequate accruals to cover the costs of site investigation and/or remediation, we cannot provide assurance that new matters, developments, laws and regulations, or stricter interpretations of existing laws and regulations will not materially affect our business or operations in the future. Our environmental accruals cover anticipated costs, including investigation, remediation, and maintenance of clean-up sites. Our estimates are based primarily on investigations and remediation plans established by independent consultants, regulatory agencies and potentially responsible third parties. Accordingly, our estimates may change based on future developments, including new or changes in existing environmental laws or policies, differences in costs required to complete anticipated actions from estimates provided, future findings of investigation or remediation actions, or alteration to the expected remediation plans. It is our policy to revise an estimate once the revision becomes probable and the amount of change can be reasonably estimated. We generally do not discount our environmental accruals and do not reduce them by anticipated insurance recoveries. We take into account third-party indemnification from financially viable parties in determining our accruals where there is no dispute regarding the right to indemnification. In the case of contamination at offsite, third-party disposal sites, as of June 29, 2019, we have been notified that we are potentially responsible and have received other notices of potential liability pursuant to various environmental laws at 14 sites at which the liability has not been settled, of which 11 sites have been active in the past few years. These laws may impose liability on certain persons that are considered jointly and severally liable for the costs of investigation and remediation of hazardous substances present at these sites, regardless of fault or legality of the original disposal. These persons include the present or former owners or operators of the site and companies that generated, disposed of or arranged for the disposal of hazardous substances at the site. We are considered a “de minimis” potentially responsible party at most of the sites, and we estimate that our aggregate liability, if any, related to these sites is not material to our condensed consolidated financial statements. We conduct extensive environmental due diligence with respect to potential acquisitions, including environmental site assessments and such further testing as we may deem warranted. If an environmental matter is identified, we estimate the cost and either establish a liability, purchase insurance or obtain an indemnity from a financially sound seller; however, in connection with our acquisitions or dispositions, we may assume or retain significant environmental liabilities, some of which we may be unaware. The potential costs related to these environmental matters and the possible impact on future operations are uncertain due in part to the complexity of government laws and regulations and their interpretations, the varying costs and effectiveness of various clean-up technologies, the uncertain level of insurance or other types of recovery, and the questionable level of our responsibility. We record a liability when it is both probable and the amount can be reasonably estimated. In our opinion, after considering accruals established for such purposes, the cost of remedial actions for compliance with the present laws and regulations governing the protection of the environment are not expected to have a material impact, individually or in the aggregate, on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows. Self-insured Risk Management Matters We are self-insured for certain of our workers’ compensation, automobile, product and general liability, disability and health costs, and we believe that we maintain adequate accruals to cover our retained liability. Our accruals for risk management matters are determined by us, are based on claims filed and estimates of claims incurred but not yet reported, and generally are not discounted. We consider a number of factors, including third-party actuarial valuations, when making these determinations. We maintain third-party stop-loss insurance policies to cover certain liability costs in excess of predetermined retained amounts. The insurance may be insufficient or unavailable (e.g., because of insurer insolvency) to protect us against loss exposure.

X
- References No definition available. + Details
Name: | us-gaap_CommitmentsAndContingenciesDisclosureAbstract
Namespace Prefix: | us-gaap_
Data Type: | xbrli:stringItemType
Balance Type: | na
Period Type: | duration

X
- Definition The entire disclosure for commitments and contingencies. + References Reference 1: http://fasb.org/us-gaap/role/ref/legacyRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 450 -URI http://asc.fasb.org/topic&trid=2127136 Reference 2: http://fasb.org/us-gaap/role/ref/legacyRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 440 -URI http://asc.fasb.org/topic&trid=2144648 + Details
Name: | us-gaap_CommitmentsAndContingenciesDisclosureTextBlock
Namespace Prefix: | us-gaap_
Data Type: | nonnum:textBlockItemType
Balance Type: | na
Period Type: | duration