XML 30 R15.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.10.0.1
FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
9 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2018
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]  
Fair Value Of Financial Instruments
NOTE 7 — FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
 
USO values its investments in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification 820 – Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (“ASC 820”). ASC 820 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles, and expands disclosures about fair value measurement. The changes to past practice resulting from the application of ASC 820 relate to the definition of fair value, the methods used to measure fair value, and the expanded disclosures about fair value measurement. ASC 820 establishes a fair value hierarchy that distinguishes between: (1) market participant assumptions developed based on market data obtained from sources independent of USO (observable inputs) and (2) USO's own assumptions about market participant assumptions developed based on the best information available under the circumstances (unobservable inputs). The three levels defined by the ASC 820 hierarchy are as follows:
 
Level I – Quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for
 
identical
 
assets or liabilities that the reporting entity has the ability to access at the measurement date.
 
Level II – Inputs other than quoted prices included within Level I that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. Level II assets include the following: quoted prices for
 
similar
 
assets or liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability, and inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data by correlation or other means (market-corroborated inputs).
 
Level III – Unobservable pricing input at the measurement date for the asset or liability. Unobservable inputs shall be used to measure fair value to the extent that observable inputs are not available.
 
In some instances, the inputs used to measure fair value might fall within different levels of the fair value hierarchy. The level in the fair value hierarchy within which the fair value measurement in its entirety falls shall be determined based on the lowest input level that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety.
 
The following table summarizes the valuation of USO’s securities at September 30, 2018 using the fair value hierarchy:
 
At September 30, 2018
 
Total
  
Level I
  
Level II
  
Level III
 
Short-Term Investments $1,598,248,323  $1,598,248,323  $  $ 
Exchange-Traded Futures Contracts                
United States Contracts  126,109,700   126,109,700       
 
During the nine months ended September 30, 2018, there were no transfers between Level I and Level II.
 
The following table summarizes the valuation of USO’s securities at December 31, 2017 using the fair value hierarchy:
 
At December 31, 2017
 
Total
  
Level I
  
Level II
  
Level III
 
Short-Term Investments $1,989,077,878  $1,989,077,878  $  $ 
Exchange-Traded Futures Contracts                
United States Contracts  117,780,350   117,780,350       
 
During the year ended December 31, 2017, there were no transfers between Level I and Level II.
 
Effective January 1, 2009, USO adopted the provisions of Accounting Standards Codification 815 — Derivatives and Hedging, which require presentation of qualitative disclosures about objectives and strategies for using derivatives, quantitative disclosures about fair value amounts and gains and losses on derivatives.
 
Fair Value of Derivative Instruments
 
Derivatives not
Accounted for
as Hedging
Instruments
 
Condensed
Statements of
Financial
Condition Location
 
Fair Value
At September 30,
2018
  
Fair Value
At December 31,
2017
 
Futures - Commodity Contracts
 Assets $126,109,700  $117,780,350 
 
The Effect of Derivative Instruments on the Condensed Statements of Operations
 
    
For the nine months ended
September 30, 2018
  
For the nine months ended
September 30, 2017
 
Derivatives not
Accounted for
as Hedging
Instruments
 
Location of
Gain (Loss)
on Derivatives
Recognized in
Income
 
Realized
Gain (Loss)
on Derivatives
Recognized in
Income
  
Change in
Unrealized
Gain (Loss) on
Derivatives
Recognized in
Income
  
Realized
Gain (Loss)
on Derivatives
Recognized in
Income
  
Change in
Unrealized
Gain (Loss) on
Derivatives
Recognized in
Income
 
Futures - Commodity Contracts
 Realized gain (loss) on
 

closed positions
 $451,011,820      $(257,378,501)    
                   
  Change in unrealized
 

gain (loss) on open
 

positions
     $8,329,350      $11,252,100