XML 33 R17.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.10.0.1
FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2018
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]  
Fair Value Of Financial Instruments
NOTE 8 — FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
 
USO values its investments in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification 820 – Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (“ASC 820”). ASC 820 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles, and expands disclosures about fair value measurement. The changes to past practice resulting from the application of ASC 820 relate to the definition of fair value, the methods used to measure fair value, and the expanded disclosures about fair value measurement. ASC 820 establishes a fair value hierarchy that distinguishes between: (1) market participant assumptions developed based on market data obtained from sources independent of USO (observable inputs) and (2) USO's own assumptions about market participant assumptions developed based on the best information available under the circumstances (unobservable inputs). The three levels defined by the ASC 820 hierarchy are as follows:
 
Level I – Quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for
identical
assets or liabilities that the reporting entity has the ability to access at the measurement date.
 
Level II – Inputs other than quoted prices included within Level I that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. Level II assets include the following: quoted prices for
similar
assets or liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability, and inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data by correlation or other means (market-corroborated inputs).
 
Level III – Unobservable pricing input at the measurement date for the asset or liability. Unobservable inputs shall be used to measure fair value to the extent that observable inputs are not available.
 
In some instances, the inputs used to measure fair value might fall within different levels of the fair value hierarchy. The level in the fair value hierarchy within which the fair value measurement in its entirety falls shall be determined based on the lowest input level that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety.
 
The following table summarizes the valuation of USO’s securities at December 31, 2018 using the fair value hierarchy:
 
At December 31, 2018
 
Total
 
 
Level I
 
 
Level II
 
 
Level III
 
Short-Term Investments
 
$
1,334,416,220
 
 
$
1,334,416,220
 
 
$
 
 
$
 
Exchange-Traded Futures Contracts
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
United States Contracts
 
 
(194,392,958
)
 
 
(194,392,958
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
During the year ended December 31, 2018, there were no transfers between Level I and Level II.
 
The following table summarizes the valuation of USO’s securities at December 31, 2017 using the fair value hierarchy:
 
At December 31, 2017
 
Total
 
 
Level I
 
 
Level II
 
 
Level III
 
Short-Term Investments
 
$
1,989,077,878
 
 
$
1,989,077,878
 
 
$
 
 
$
 
Exchange-Traded Futures Contracts
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
United States Contracts
 
 
117,780,350
 
 
 
117,780,350
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
During the year ended December 31, 2017, there were no transfers between Level I and Level II.
 
Effective January 1, 2009, USO adopted the provisions of Accounting Standards Codification 815 — Derivatives and Hedging, which require presentation of qualitative disclosures about objectives and strategies for using derivatives, quantitative disclosures about fair value amounts and gains and losses on derivatives.
 
Fair Value of Derivative Instruments
 
Derivatives not 

Accounted for

as Hedging 

Instruments
 
Statements of Financial

Condition Location
 
Fair Value

At December 31,

2018
 
 
Fair Value

At December 31,

2017
 
Futures - Commodity Contracts
 
Assets
 
$
(194,392,958
)
 
$
117,780,350
 
 
The Effect of Derivative Instruments on the Statements of Operations
 
 
 
 
 
For the year ended

December 31, 2018
 
 
For the year ended

December 31, 2017
 
 
For the year ended

December 31, 2016
 
Derivatives

not Accounted

for as

Hedging

Instruments
 
Location of

Gain (Loss)

on Derivatives

Recognized in

Income
 
Realized

Gain (Loss)

on Derivatives

Recognized in

Income
 
 
Change in

Unrealized

Gain (Loss) on

Derivatives

Recognized in

Income
 
 
Realized

Gain (Loss)

on Derivatives

Recognized in

Income
 
 
Change in

Unrealized

Gain (Loss) on

Derivatives

Recognized in

Income
 
 
Realized

Gain (Loss)

on Derivatives

Recognized in

Income
 
 
Change in

Unrealized

Gain (Loss) on

Derivatives

Recognized in

Income
 
Futures - Commodity Contracts
 
Realized gain (loss) on closed positions
 
$
1,603,334
 
 
 
 
 
 
$
70,673,279
 
 
 
 
 
 
$
431,308,189
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Change in unrealized gain (loss) on open positions
 
 
 
 
 
$
(312,173,308
)
 
 
 
 
 
$
6,489,790
 
 
 
 
 
 
$
249,798,620