Fair Value Measurements	9 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2023
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]
Fair Value Measurements	16. Fair Value Measurements The authoritative guidance on fair value measurement defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date (referred to as an “exit price”). At September 30, 2023 and December 31, 2022, the Company’s financial instruments include cash, cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable, debt, and other liabilities. The fair values of these financial instruments approximate their carrying values due to their short-term maturities. Investments measured at fair value are based on one or more of the following three valuation techniques: • Market approach—Prices and other relevant information generated by market transactions involving identical or comparable assets or liabilities; • Cost approach—Amount that would be required to replace the service capacity of an asset (i.e., replacement cost); and • Income approach—Techniques to convert future amounts to a single present amount based on market expectations (including present value techniques, option-pricing models and lattice models). In addition, the guidance establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities (Level 1 measurements) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3 measurements). The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are: Level 1 - Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for identical assets and liabilities; Level 2 - Pricing inputs that include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets and inputs that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the instrument; and Level 3 - Prices or valuations that require inputs that are both significant to the fair value measurements and unobservable. The Company's contingent consideration is categorized as Level 3 within the fair value hierarchy. Contingent consideration is recorded within other long-term liabilities in the Company's consolidated balance sheet as of September 30, 2023. Contingent consideration has been recorded at its fair values using the option pricing method prescribed in the earnout valuation guide published by The Appraisal Foundation. We considered three major risks associated with earnout, i.e. risk in the underlying metric, risk in the earnout structure, and counterparty credit risk. Our valuation model was based on the Black Scholes option pricing formula and major assumptions including SealingTech's fiscal year 2024 projected revenue, the revenue discount rate, the revenue volatility, and the Company's credit adjusted discount rate. The methods described above may produce a fair value calculation that may not be indicative of net realizable value or reflective of future fair values. Furthermore, while the Company believes its valuation methods are appropriate and consistent with other market participants, the use of different methodologies or assumptions to determine the fair value of certain financial instruments could result in a different fair value measurement at the reporting date. Refer to Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2022 for a more complete discussion of the various items within the consolidated financial statements measured at fair value and the methods used to determine fair value.

Fair Value Measurements

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2023

16.

Fair Value Measurements

The authoritative guidance on fair value measurement defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date (referred to as an “exit price”). At September 30, 2023 and December 31, 2022, the Company’s financial instruments include cash, cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable, debt, and other liabilities. The fair values of these financial instruments approximate their carrying values due to their short-term maturities.

Investments measured at fair value are based on one or more of the following three valuation techniques:

•

Market approach—Prices and other relevant information generated by market transactions involving identical or comparable assets or liabilities;

•

Cost approach—Amount that would be required to replace the service capacity of an asset (i.e., replacement cost); and

•

Income approach—Techniques to convert future amounts to a single present amount based on market expectations (including present value techniques, option-pricing models and lattice models).

In addition, the guidance establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities (Level 1 measurements) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3 measurements). The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are:

Level 1 - Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for identical assets and liabilities;

Level 2 - Pricing inputs that include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets and inputs that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the instrument; and

Level 3 - Prices or valuations that require inputs that are both significant to the fair value measurements and unobservable.

The Company's contingent consideration is categorized as Level 3 within the fair value hierarchy. Contingent consideration is recorded within other long-term liabilities in the Company's consolidated balance sheet as of September 30, 2023. Contingent consideration has been recorded at its fair values using the option pricing method prescribed in the earnout valuation guide published by The Appraisal Foundation. We considered three major risks associated with earnout, i.e. risk in the underlying metric, risk in the earnout structure, and counterparty credit risk. Our valuation model was based on the Black Scholes option pricing formula and major assumptions including SealingTech's fiscal year 2024 projected revenue, the revenue discount rate, the revenue volatility, and the Company's credit adjusted discount rate.

The methods described above may produce a fair value calculation that may not be indicative of net realizable value or reflective of future fair values. Furthermore, while the Company believes its valuation methods are appropriate and consistent with other market participants, the use of different methodologies or assumptions to determine the fair value of certain financial instruments could result in a different fair value measurement at the reporting date.

Refer to Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2022 for a more complete discussion of the various items within the consolidated financial statements measured at fair value and the methods used to determine fair value.

- Definition

The entire disclosure for the fair value of financial instruments (as defined), including financial assets and financial liabilities (collectively, as defined), and the measurements of those instruments as well as disclosures related to the fair value of non-financial assets and liabilities. Such disclosures about the financial instruments, assets, and liabilities would include: (1) the fair value of the required items together with their carrying amounts (as appropriate); (2) for items for which it is not practicable to estimate fair value, disclosure would include: (a) information pertinent to estimating fair value (including, carrying amount, effective interest rate, and maturity, and (b) the reasons why it is not practicable to estimate fair value; (3) significant concentrations of credit risk including: (a) information about the activity, region, or economic characteristics identifying a concentration, (b) the maximum amount of loss the entity is exposed to based on the gross fair value of the related item, (c) policy for requiring collateral or other security and information as to accessing such collateral or security, and (d) the nature and brief description of such collateral or security; (4) quantitative information about market risks and how such risks are managed; (5) for items measured on both a recurring and nonrecurring basis information regarding the inputs used to develop the fair value measurement; and (6) for items presented in the financial statement for which fair value measurement is elected: (a) information necessary to understand the reasons for the election, (b) discussion of the effect of fair value changes on earnings, (c) a description of [similar groups] items for which the election is made and the relation thereof to the balance sheet, the aggregate carrying value of items included in the balance sheet that are not eligible for the election; (7) all other required (as defined) and desired information.

+ References + Details