XML 90 R14.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.8
Employee Benefit Plans
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2013
Pension and Other Postretirement Benefit Expense [Abstract]  
Employee Benefit Plans
Employee Benefit Plans

The Company sponsors defined benefit pension plans covering certain employees, principally in the United States, the United Kingdom, Germany, Finland, Norway, France, Switzerland, Australia and Argentina. The Company also provides certain postretirement health care and life insurance benefits for certain employees, principally in the United States and Brazil.
                                                                                                     
Net annual pension costs for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011 are set forth below (in millions):
Pension benefits
 
2013
 
2012
 
2011
Service cost
 
$
14.9

 
$
14.4

 
$
14.4

Interest cost
 
33.9

 
38.2

 
40.1

Expected return on plan assets
 
(37.6
)
 
(36.3
)
 
(37.1
)
Amortization of net actuarial loss
 
13.3

 
9.5

 
6.4

Amortization of prior service credit
 
(0.1
)
 
(0.1
)
 
(0.2
)
Settlement loss
 
0.1

 
0.2

 
0.1

Special termination benefits and other
 

 

 
0.2

Net annual pension cost
 
$
24.5

 
$
25.9

 
$
23.9



The weighted average assumptions used to determine the net annual pension costs for the Company’s pension plans for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011 are as follows:
 
2013
 
2012
 
2011
All plans:
 

 
 

 
 

Weighted average discount rate
4.3
%
 
5.1
%
 
5.6
%
Weighted average expected long-term rate of return on plan assets
6.8
%
 
7.0
%
 
7.0
%
Rate of increase in future compensation
2.5-4.0%

 
2.5-4.5%

 
2.5-4.5%

U.S.-based plans:
 

 
 

 
 

Weighted average discount rate
3.9
%
 
4.6
%
 
5.4
%
Weighted average expected long-term rate of return on plan assets
7.0
%
 
7.75
%
 
8.0
%
Rate of increase in future compensation
N/A

 
N/A

 
N/A



Net annual postretirement benefit costs for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011 are set forth below (in millions, except percentages):
Postretirement benefits
 
2013
 
2012
 
2011
Service cost
 
$
0.1

 
$
0.1

 
$
0.1

Interest cost
 
1.7

 
1.5

 
1.6

Amortization of prior service cost (credit)
 
0.2

 
(0.2
)
 
(0.3
)
Amortization of net actuarial loss
 
0.5

 
0.4

 
0.3

Net annual postretirement benefit cost
 
$
2.5

 
$
1.8

 
$
1.7

Weighted average discount rate
 
4.7
%
 
4.8
%
 
5.6
%

    
The following tables set forth reconciliations of the changes in benefit obligation, plan assets and funded status as of December 31, 2013 and 2012 (in millions):
 
 
Pension Benefits
 
Postretirement
Benefits
Change in benefit obligation
 
2013
 
2012
 
2013
 
2012
Benefit obligation at beginning of year
 
$
842.3

 
$
765.9

 
$
37.0

 
$
31.8

Service cost
 
14.9

 
14.4

 
0.1

 
0.1

Interest cost
 
33.9

 
38.2

 
1.7

 
1.5

Plan participants’ contributions
 
1.3

 
1.2

 

 

Actuarial loss (gain)
 
(4.1
)
 
36.1

 
(6.2
)
 
1.8

Amendments
 

 

 

 
3.9

Settlements
 
(0.6
)
 
(0.4
)
 

 

Benefits paid
 
(52.9
)
 
(44.6
)
 
(1.8
)
 
(1.8
)
Special termination benefits and other
 

 

 

 
0.1

Foreign currency exchange rate changes
 
16.4

 
31.5

 
(0.5
)
 
(0.4
)
Benefit obligation at end of year
 
$
851.2

 
$
842.3

 
$
30.3

 
$
37.0

 
 
 
 
 
Postretirement
Benefits
 
 
Pension Benefits
 
Change in plan assets
 
2013
 
2012
 
2013
 
2012
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year
 
$
576.7

 
$
520.8

 
$

 
$

Actual return on plan assets
 
81.3

 
40.6

 

 

Employer contributions
 
41.0

 
36.1

 
1.8

 
1.7

Plan participants’ contributions
 
1.3

 
1.2

 

 

Benefits paid
 
(52.9
)
 
(44.6
)
 
(1.8
)
 
(1.8
)
Settlements
 
(0.6
)
 
(0.4
)
 

 

Other
 

 

 

 
0.1

Foreign currency exchange rate changes
 
13.9

 
23.0

 

 

Fair value of plan assets at end of year
 
$
660.7

 
$
576.7

 
$

 
$

Funded status
 
$
(190.5
)
 
$
(265.6
)
 
$
(30.3
)
 
$
(37.0
)
Unrecognized net actuarial loss
 
260.3

 
321.5

 
4.1

 
10.8

Unrecognized prior service (credit) cost
 
(0.1
)
 
(0.2
)
 
3.9

 
4.2

Accumulated other comprehensive loss
 
(260.2
)
 
(321.3
)
 
(8.0
)
 
(15.0
)
Net amount recognized
 
$
(190.5
)
 
$
(265.6
)
 
$
(30.3
)
 
$
(37.0
)

Amounts recognized in Consolidated Balance Sheets:
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Other long-term asset
$

 
$
0.1

 
$

 
$

Other current liabilities
(3.0
)
 
(2.5
)
 
(1.8
)
 
(1.7
)
Accrued expenses
(5.4
)
 
(5.2
)
 

 

Pensions and postretirement health care benefits (noncurrent)
(182.1
)
 
(258.0
)
 
(28.5
)
 
(35.3
)
Net amount recognized
$
(190.5
)
 
$
(265.6
)
 
$
(30.3
)
 
$
(37.0
)


    
The following table summarizes the activity in accumulated other comprehensive loss related to the Company’s defined pension and postretirement benefit plans during the year ended December 31, 2013 (in millions):
 
 
Before-Tax
Amount
 
Income
Tax
 
After-Tax
Amount
Accumulated other comprehensive loss as of December 31, 2012
 
$
(355.2
)
 
$
(92.3
)
 
$
(262.9
)
Net loss recognized due to settlement
 
0.1

 
0.1

 

Net actuarial gain arising during the year
 
60.1

 
14.9

 
45.2

Amortization of prior service cost
 
1.1

 
0.5

 
0.6

Amortization of net actuarial loss
 
14.5

 
3.8

 
10.7

Accumulated other comprehensive loss as of December 31, 2013
 
$
(279.4
)
 
$
(73.0
)
 
$
(206.4
)


As of December 31, 2013, the Company’s accumulated other comprehensive loss included a net actuarial loss of approximately $260.3 million and a net prior service credit of approximately $0.1 million related to the Company’s defined benefit pension plans. The estimated net actuarial loss and net prior service credit for defined benefit pension plans expected to be amortized from the Company’s accumulated other comprehensive loss during the year ended December 31, 2014 are approximately $8.6 million and $0.1 million, respectively.

As of December 31, 2013, the Company’s accumulated other comprehensive loss included a net actuarial loss of approximately $4.1 million and a net prior service cost of approximately $3.9 million related to the Company’s U.S. and Brazilian postretirement health care benefit plans. The estimated net actuarial loss and net prior service cost for postretirement health care benefit plans expected to be amortized from the Company’s accumulated other comprehensive loss during the year ended December 31, 2014 are approximately $0.1 million and $0.2 million, respectively.

The weighted average assumptions used to determine the benefit obligation for the Company’s pension plans as of December 31, 2013 and 2012 are as follows:
 
2013
 
2012
All plans:
 

 
 

Weighted average discount rate
4.3
%
 
4.3
%
Rate of increase in future compensation
2.5-4.5%

 
2.5-4.0%

U.S.-based plans:
 

 
 

Weighted average discount rate
4.8
%
 
3.9
%
Rate of increase in future compensation
N/A

 
N/A



The weighted average discount rate used to determine the benefit obligation for the Company’s postretirement benefit plans for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 was 5.3% and 4.7%, respectively.

The aggregate projected benefit obligation, accumulated benefit obligation and fair value of plan assets for pension and other postretirement plans with accumulated benefit obligations in excess of plan assets were $873.6 million, $834.5 million and $653.1 million, respectively, as of December 31, 2013, and $870.8 million, $830.8 million and $569.0 million, respectively, as of December 31, 2012. The projected benefit obligation, accumulated benefit obligation, and fair value of plan assets for the Company’s U.S-based qualified pension plans with accumulated benefit obligations in excess of plan assets were $48.1 million, $48.1 million and $41.9 million, respectively, as of December 31, 2013, and $54.4 million, $54.4 million and $36.7 million, respectively, as of December 31, 2012. The Company’s accumulated comprehensive loss as of December 31, 2013 reflects a reduction of equity of $268.2 million, net of taxes of $74.0 million, primarily related to the Company’s U.K. pension plan, where the projected benefit obligation exceeded the plan assets. In addition, the Company’s accumulated comprehensive loss as of December 31, 2013 reflects a reduction of equity of approximately $1.3 million, net of taxes of $0.4 million, related to the Company’s GIMA joint venture. The amount represents 50% of GIMA’s unrecognized net actuarial losses and unrecognized prior service cost associated with its pension plan. The Company’s accumulated comprehensive loss as of December 31, 2012 reflected a reduction of equity of $336.3 million, net of taxes of $90.2 million, primarily related to the Company’s U.K. pension plan, where the projected benefit obligation exceeded the plan assets. In addition, the Company’s accumulated comprehensive loss as of December 31, 2012 reflected a reduction of equity of approximately $1.4 million, net of taxes of $0.5 million related to the Company’s GIMA joint venture. This amount represented 50% of GIMA’s unrecognized net actuarial losses and unrecognized prior service cost associated with its pension plan.

For the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, the Company used a globally consistent methodology to set the discount rate in the countries where its largest benefit obligations exist. In the United States, the United Kingdom and the Euro Zone, the Company constructed a hypothetical bond portfolio of high-quality corporate bonds and then applied the cash flows of the Company’s benefit plans to those bond yields to derive a discount rate. The bond portfolio and plan-specific cash flows vary by country, but the methodology in which the portfolio is constructed is consistent. In the United States, the bond portfolio is large enough to result in taking a “settlement approach” to derive the discount rate, where high-quality corporate bonds are assumed to be purchased and the resulting coupon payments and maturities are used to satisfy the Company’s largest U.S. pension plan’s projected benefit payments. In the United Kingdom and the Euro Zone, the discount rate is derived using a “yield curve approach,” where an individual spot rate, or zero coupon bond yield, for each future annual period is developed to discount each future benefit payment and, thereby, determine the present value of all future payments. Under the settlement and yield curve approaches, the discount rate is set to equal the single discount rate that produces the same present value of all future payments.

Investment strategy and concentration of risk

The weighted average asset allocation of the Company’s U.S. pension benefit plans as of December 31, 2013 and 2012 are as follows:
Asset Category
 
2013
 
2012
Large and small cap domestic equity securities
 
48
%
 
45
%
International equity securities
 
16
%
 
14
%
Domestic fixed income securities
 
16
%
 
21
%
Other investments
 
20
%
 
20
%
Total
 
100
%
 
100
%


The weighted average asset allocation of the Company’s non-U.S. pension benefit plans as of December 31, 2013 and 2012 are as follows:
Asset Category
 
2013
 
2012
Equity securities
 
45
%
 
42
%
Fixed income securities
 
30
%
 
34
%
Other investments
 
25
%
 
24
%
Total
 
100
%
 
100
%


ASC 820, “Fair Value Measurements” (“ASC 820”), establishes a framework for measuring fair value. The framework provides a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1 measurements) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3 measurements). The three levels of the fair value hierarchy under ASC 820 are described as follows:

Level 1: Inputs to the valuation methodology are unadjusted quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in active markets that the Company has the ability to access.

Level 2: Inputs to the valuation methodology include:
quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets;
quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in inactive markets;
inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability; and
inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data by correlation or other means.

If the asset or liability has a specified (contractual) term, the Level 2 input must be observable for substantially the full term of the asset or liability.

Level 3: Inputs to the valuation methodology are unobservable and significant to the fair value measurement.
The asset’s or liability’s fair value measurement level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of any input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The Company’s valuation techniques are designed to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. The Company uses the following valuation methodologies to measure the fair value of the plan assets:

Equity Securities: Equity securities are valued on the basis of the closing price per unit on each business day as reported on the applicable exchange.

Fixed Income: Fixed income securities are valued using the closing prices in the active market in which the fixed income investment trades. Fixed income funds are valued using the net asset value of the fund, which is based on the fair value of the underlying securities.

Cash: These investments primarily consist of short term investment funds which are valued using the net asset value.

Alternative Investments and Pooled Funds: These investments are reported at fair value as determined by the general partner of the alternative investment or pooled fund. The “market approach” valuation technique is used to value investments in these funds. The funds are typically open-end funds as they generally offer subscription and redemption options to investors. The frequency of such subscriptions or redemptions is dictated by each fund’s governing documents. The amount of liquidity provided to investors in a particular fund is generally consistent with the liquidity and risk associated with the underlying portfolio (i.e., the more liquid the investments in the portfolio, the greater the liquidity provided to investors). Liquidity of individual funds varies based on various factors and may include “gates,” “holdbacks” and “side pockets” imposed by the manager of the fund, as well as redemption fees that may also apply. Investments in these funds are typically valued utilizing the net asset valuations provided by their underlying investment managers, general partners or administrators. The funds consider subscription and redemption rights, including any restrictions on the disposition of the interest, in its determination of the fair value.

Insurance Contracts: Insurance contracts are valued using current prevailing interest rates.

The fair value of the Company’s pension assets as of December 31, 2013 is as follows (in millions):
 
Total
 
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
Equity securities:
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Global equities
$
132.0

 
$
132.0

 
$

 
$

Non-U.S. equities
6.7

 
6.7

 

 

U.K. equities
132.0

 
132.0

 

 

U.S. large cap equities
13.9

 
13.9

 

 

U.S. small cap equities
6.2

 
6.2

 

 

Total equity securities
290.8

 
290.8

 

 

Fixed income:
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Aggregate fixed income
6.5

 
6.5

 

 

International fixed income
180.8

 
180.8

 

 

Total fixed income share(1)
187.3

 
187.3

 

 

Cash and equivalents:
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Cash
10.8

 

 
10.8

 

Total cash and equivalents
10.8

 

 
10.8

 

Alternative investments(2)
146.0

 

 

 
146.0

Miscellaneous funds(3)
25.8

 

 

 
25.8

Total assets
$
660.7

 
$
478.1

 
$
10.8

 
$
171.8

______________________________________
(1)
40% of “fixed income” securities are in government treasuries; 31% are in investment-grade corporate bonds; and 29% are in other various fixed income securities.
(2)
35% of “alternative investments” are in long-short equity funds; 29% are in event-driven funds; 12% are in relative value funds; 12% are in credit funds; 7% are distributed in hedged and non-hedged funds; and 5% are in multi-strategy funds.
(3)
“Miscellaneous funds” is comprised of pooled funds in Australia and insurance contracts in Finland, Norway and Switzerland.
The following is a reconciliation of Level 3 assets as of December 31, 2013 (in millions):
 
Total
 
Alternative
Investments
 
Miscellaneous
Funds
Beginning balance as of December 31, 2012
$
152.6

 
$
127.1

 
$
25.5

Actual return on plan assets:
 

 
 

 
 

(a) Relating to assets still held at reporting date
15.4

 
15.1

 
0.3

(b) Relating to assets sold during period
0.3

 
0.3

 

Purchases, sales and /or settlements
0.5

 
0.3

 
0.2

Foreign currency exchange rate changes
3.0

 
3.2

 
(0.2
)
Ending balance as of December 31, 2013
$
171.8

 
$
146.0

 
$
25.8



The fair value of the Company’s pension assets as of December 31, 2012 is as follows (in millions):
 
Total
 
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
Equity securities:
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Global equities
$
103.7

 
$
103.7

 
$

 
$

Non-U.S. equities
5.2

 
5.2

 

 

U.K. equities
112.2

 
112.2

 

 

U.S. large cap equities
11.1

 
11.1

 

 

U.S. small cap equities
5.4

 
5.4

 

 

Total equity securities
237.6

 
237.6

 

 

Fixed income:
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Aggregate fixed income
7.6

 
7.6

 

 

International fixed income
176.7

 
176.7

 

 

Total fixed income share(1)
184.3

 
184.3

 

 

Cash and equivalents:
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Cash
2.2

 

 
2.2

 

Total cash and equivalents
2.2

 

 
2.2

 

Alternative investments(2)
127.1

 

 

 
127.1

Miscellaneous funds(3)
25.5

 

 

 
25.5

Total assets
$
576.7

 
$
421.9

 
$
2.2

 
$
152.6

_______________________________________
(1)
39% of “fixed income” securities are in investment-grade corporate bonds; 34% are in other various fixed income securities; and 27% are in government treasuries.
(2)
24% of “alternative investments” are in long-short equity funds; 19% are in multi-strategy funds; 17% are in event-driven funds; 16% are distributed in hedged and non-hedged funds; 12% are in relative value funds; and 12% are in credit funds.
(3)
“Miscellaneous funds” is comprised of pooled funds in Australia and various contracts in Finland, Norway and Switzerland.

The following is a reconciliation of Level 3 assets as of December 31, 2012 (in millions):
 
Total
 
Alternative
Investments
 
Miscellaneous
Funds
Beginning balance as of December 31, 2011
$
140.9

 
$
119.8

 
$
21.1

Actual return on plan assets:
 

 
 

 
 

(a) Relating to assets still held at reporting date
4.3

 
4.1

 
0.2

(b) Relating to assets sold during period
0.5

 
0.5

 

Purchases, sales and /or settlements
1.2

 
(2.3
)
 
3.5

Transfers in and /or out of Level 3
(0.2
)
 
(0.2
)
 

Foreign currency exchange rate changes
5.9

 
5.2

 
0.7

Ending balance as of December 31, 2012
$
152.6

 
$
127.1

 
$
25.5


All tax-qualified pension fund investments in the United States are held in the AGCO Corporation Master Pension Trust. The Company’s global pension fund strategy is to diversify investments across broad categories of equity and fixed income securities with appropriate use of alternative investment categories to minimize risk and volatility. The primary investment objective of the Company’s pension plans is to secure participant retirement benefits. As such, the key objective in the pension plans’ financial management is to promote stability and, to the extent appropriate, growth in funded status.

The investment strategy for the plans’ portfolio of assets balances the requirement to generate returns with the need to control risk. The asset mix is recognized as the primary mechanism to influence the reward and risk structure of the pension fund investments in an effort to accomplish the plans’ funding objectives. The overall investment strategy for the U.S.-based pension plans is to achieve a mix of approximately 15% of assets for the near-term benefit payments and 85% for longer-term growth. The overall U.S. pension funds invest in a broad diversification of asset types. The Company’s U.S. target allocation of retirement fund investments is 45% large- and small-cap domestic equity securities, 15% international equity securities, 20% broad fixed income securities and 20% in alternative investments. The Company has noted that over very long periods, this mix of investments would achieve an average return of approximately 7.0%. The overall investment strategy for the non-U.S. based pension plans is to achieve a mix of approximately 30% of assets for the near-term benefit payments and 70% for longer-term growth. The overall non-U.S. pension funds invest in a broad diversification of asset types. The Company’s non-U.S. target allocation of retirement fund investments is 45% equity securities, 30% broad fixed income investments and 25% in alternative investments. The majority of the Company’s non-U.S. pension fund investments are related to the Company’s pension plan in the United Kingdom. The Company has noted that over very long periods, this mix of investments would achieve an average return in excess of 7.8%. In arriving at the choice of an expected return assumption of 7.0% for its U.K.-based plans for the year ended December 31, 2014, the Company has tempered this historical indicator with lower expectations for returns and equity investment in the future as well as the administrative costs of the plans.

Equity securities primarily include investments in large-cap and small-cap companies located across the globe. Fixed income securities include corporate bonds of companies from diversified industries, mortgage-backed securities, agency mortgages, asset-backed securities and government securities. Alternative and other assets include investments in hedge fund of funds that follow diversified investment strategies. To date, the Company has not invested pension funds in its own stock and has no intention of doing so in the future.

Within each asset class, careful consideration is given to balancing the portfolio among industry sectors, geographies, interest rate sensitivity, dependence on economic growth, currency and other factors affecting investment returns. The assets are managed by professional investment firms, who are bound by precise mandates and are measured against specific benchmarks. Among asset managers, consideration is given, among others, to balancing security concentration, issuer concentration, investment style and reliance on particular active investment strategies.

For measuring the expected U.S. postretirement benefit obligation at December 31, 2013 and 2012, the Company assumed an 7.5% and 8.0% health care cost trend rate for 2014 and 2013, respectively, decreasing to 5.0% by 2019. For measuring the Brazilian postretirement benefit plan obligation at December 31, 2013, the Company assumed a 12.25% health care cost trend rate for 2014, decreasing to 6.45% by 2024. For measuring the Brazilian postretirement benefit plan obligation at December 31, 2012, the Company assumed a 10.7% health care cost trend rate for 2013, decreasing to 6.2% by 2022. Changing the assumed health care cost trend rates by one percentage point each year and holding all other assumptions constant would have the following effect to service and interest cost for 2013 and the accumulated postretirement benefit obligation at December 31, 2013 (in millions):
 
One Percentage
Point Increase
 
One Percentage
Point Decrease
Effect on service and interest cost
$
0.4

 
$
(0.3
)
Effect on accumulated benefit obligation
$
3.8

 
$
(3.8
)


The Company currently estimates its minimum contributions to its U.S.-based defined pension plans for 2014 will aggregate approximately $2.6 million. The Company currently estimates its benefit payments for 2014 to its U.S.-based postretirement health care and life insurance benefit plans will aggregate approximately $1.8 million and its benefits for 2014 to its Brazilian postretirement health care benefit plans will aggregate approximately less than $0.1 million. The Company currently estimates its minimum contributions for underfunded plans and benefit payments for unfunded plans for 2014 to its non-U.S.-based defined pension plans will aggregate approximately $40.0 million, of which approximately $25.6 million relates to its U.K. pension plan.

During 2013, approximately $53.5 million of benefit payments were made related to the Company’s pension plans. At December 31, 2013, the aggregate expected benefit payments for all of the Company’s pension plans are as follows (in millions):
2014
$
53.2

2015
51.4

2016
50.6

2017
50.3

2018
51.2

2019 through 2023
276.6

 
$
533.3



During 2013, approximately $1.8 million of benefit payments were made related to the Company’s U.S. and Brazilian postretirement benefit plans. At December 31, 2013, the aggregate expected benefit payments for the Company’s U.S. and Brazilian postretirement benefit plans are as follows (in millions):
2014
$
1.8

2015
1.8

2016
1.9

2017
1.9

2018
2.0

2019 through 2023
10.4

 
$
19.8



The Company participates in a small number of multiemployer plans in the Netherlands and Sweden. The Company has assessed and determined that none of the multiemployer plans which it participates in are individually, or in the aggregate, significant to the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements. The Company does not expect to incur a withdrawal liability or expect to significantly increase its contributions over the remainder of the multiemployer plans’ contract periods.

The Company maintains an Executive Nonqualified Pension Plan (“ENPP”), which provides U.S.-based senior executives with retirement income for a period of 15 years based on a percentage of the average of their highest three non-consecutive years of base salary and bonus during their final ten years of employment (referred to as their “three-year average compensation”), reduced by the senior executive’s social security benefits and 401(k) employer-matching contributions, as if the executive had made the maximum contribution. The benefit paid to the executives ranges from 2.25% to 3.00% of their three-year average compensation multiplied by credited years of service (subject to a maximum of 20 years). For nearly all participants, benefits under the ENPP vest if the participant has attained age 50 with at least ten years of service (five years of which include years of participation in the ENPP), but are not payable until the participant reaches age 65 or upon termination of services because of death or disability, adjusted to reflect payment prior to age 65.

Net annual ENPP cost and the measurement assumptions for the plans for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011 are set forth below (in millions, except percentages):
 
2013
 
2012
 
2011
Service cost
$
3.1

 
$
2.8

 
$
1.8

Interest cost
1.5

 
1.4

 
1.0

Amortization of prior service cost
0.9

 
0.9

 
0.6

Amortization of net actuarial loss
0.7

 
0.3

 
0.1

Net annual ENPP costs
$
6.2

 
$
5.4

 
$
3.5

Discount rate
3.9
%
 
4.6
%
 
5.4
%
Rate of increase in future compensation
5.0
%
 
5.0
%
 
5.0
%


The following tables set forth reconciliations of the changes in benefit obligation and funded status as of December 31, 2013 and 2012 (in millions):
Change in benefit obligation
 
2013
 
2012
Benefit obligation at beginning of year
 
$
39.6

 
$
31.0

Service cost
 
3.1

 
2.8

Interest cost
 
1.5

 
1.4

Actuarial (gain) loss
 
(6.0
)
 
5.3

Benefits paid
 
(1.2
)
 
(0.9
)
Benefit obligation at end of year
 
$
37.0

 
$
39.6

Funded status
 
$
(37.0
)
 
$
(39.6
)
Unrecognized net actuarial loss
 
5.2

 
11.9

Unrecognized prior service cost
 
4.7

 
5.6

Accumulated other comprehensive loss
 
(9.9
)
 
(17.5
)
Net amount recognized
 
$
(37.0
)
 
$
(39.6
)
Amounts recognized in Consolidated Balance Sheets:
 
 

 
 

Other current liabilities
 
$
(1.2
)
 
$
(1.3
)
Pensions and postretirement health care benefits (noncurrent)
 
(35.8
)
 
(38.3
)
Net amount recognized
 
$
(37.0
)
 
$
(39.6
)


The weighted average discount rate used to determine the benefit obligation for the ENPP for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 was 4.8% and 3.9%, respectively.

At December 31, 2013, the Company’s accumulated other comprehensive loss included a net actuarial loss of approximately $5.2 million and a net prior service cost of approximately $4.7 million related to the ENPP. The estimated net actuarial loss and net prior service cost related to the ENPP expected to be amortized from the Company’s accumulated other comprehensive loss during the year ended December 31, 2014 are approximately $0.1 million and $0.9 million, respectively.

At December 31, 2013, the Company recorded a reduction to equity of $9.9 million, in addition to a deferred tax liability of $1.4 million, related to the unfunded projected benefit obligation of the ENPP. At December 31, 2012, the Company recorded a reduction to equity of $17.5 million, net of taxes of $1.6 million, related to the unfunded projected benefit obligation of the ENPP. Refer to Note 5 for information on the reversal of the valuation allowance previously established against the Company’s deferred tax assets in the United States.

During 2013, approximately $1.2 million of benefit payments were made related to the ENPP. At December 31, 2013, the aggregate expected benefit payments for the ENPP are as follows (in millions):
2014
$
1.3

2015
0.9

2016
1.1

2017
2.7

2018
2.7

2019 through 2023
15.1

 
$
23.8



The Company maintains separate defined contribution plans covering certain employees, primarily in the United States, the United Kingdom and Brazil. Under the plans, the Company contributes a specified percentage of each eligible employee’s compensation. The Company contributed approximately $13.0 million, $11.7 million and $10.0 million for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively.