XML 32 R22.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT
v3.25.2

Commitments and Contingencies | 6 Months Ended
--- | ---
Jun. 30, 2025
Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract] |
Commitments and Contingencies | Commitments and Contingencies The following table summarizes our expected contractual cash commitments as of June 30, 2025:
| 2025 |  | 2026 |  | 2027 |  | 2028 |  | 2029 |  | Thereafter |  | Total
Debt obligations | $ | 31 |  |  | $ | 1,059 |  |  | $ | 2,318 |  |  | $ | 2,575 |  |  | $ | 1,250 |  |  | $ | 3,000 |  |  | $ | 10,233 |
Cash interest payments | 228 |  |  | 452 |  |  | 402 |  |  | 280 |  |  | 189 |  |  | 178 |  |  | 1,729 |
Satellite and transmission | 109 |  |  | 124 |  |  | 47 |  |  | 1 |  |  | 1 |  |  | 3 |  |  | 285 |
Programming and content | 190 |  |  | 289 |  |  | 190 |  |  | 99 |  |  | 43 |  |  | 20 |  |  | 831 |
Sales and marketing | 24 |  |  | 30 |  |  | 10 |  |  | 2 |  |  | 2 |  |  | — |  |  | 68 |
Satellite incentive payments | 4 |  |  | 3 |  |  | 3 |  |  | 3 |  |  | 2 |  |  | 10 |  |  | 25 |
Operating lease obligations | 29 |  |  | 53 |  |  | 49 |  |  | 40 |  |  | 35 |  |  | 38 |  |  | 244 |
Royalties, minimum guarantees and other | 410 |  |  | 486 |  |  | 364 |  |  | 294 |  |  | 196 |  |  | 75 |  |  | 1,825 |
Total (1) | $ | 1,025 |  |  | $ | 2,496 |  |  | $ | 3,383 |  |  | $ | 3,294 |  |  | $ | 1,718 |  |  | $ | 3,324 |  |  | $ | 15,240 |
(1)The table does not include our reserve for uncertain tax positions, which at June 30, 2025 totaled $80. Debt obligations. Debt obligations include principal payments on outstanding debt and finance lease obligations. Cash interest payments. Cash interest payments include interest due on outstanding debt and finance lease payments through maturity. Satellite and transmission. We have entered into agreements for the design, construction, launch and insurance of two additional satellites: SXM-11 and SXM-12. We have procured insurance for SXM-9 and SXM-10 to cover the risks associated with each satellite's launch and first year of in-orbit operation. We also have entered into agreements with third parties to operate and maintain satellite telemetry, tracking and control facilities and certain components of our terrestrial repeater networks. Programming and content. We have entered into various programming and content agreements. Under the terms of these agreements, our obligations include fixed payments, advertising commitments and revenue sharing arrangements. In certain of these agreements, the future revenue sharing costs are dependent upon many factors and are difficult to estimate; therefore, they are not included in our minimum contractual cash commitments. Sales and marketing. We have entered into various marketing, sponsorship and distribution agreements to promote our brands and are obligated to make payments to sponsors, retailers, automakers, radio manufacturers and other third parties under these agreements. Certain programming and content agreements also require us to purchase advertising on properties owned or controlled by the licensors. Satellite incentive payments. Maxar Technologies (formerly Space Systems/Loral), the manufacturer of certain of our in-orbit satellites, may be entitled to future in-orbit performance payments upon XM-5, SIRIUS FM-6, SXM-8, SXM-9 and SXM-10 meeting their fifteen-year design life, which we expect to occur. Operating lease obligations. We have entered into both cancelable and non-cancelable operating leases for office space, terrestrial repeaters, data centers and equipment. These leases provide for minimum lease payments, additional operating expense charges, leasehold improvements and rent escalations that have initial terms ranging from one to fifteen years, and certain leases have options to renew. Royalties, Minimum Guarantees and Other. We have entered into music royalty arrangements that include fixed payments. In addition, certain of our podcast agreements also contain minimum guarantees. As of June 30, 2025, we had future fixed commitments related to music royalty and podcast agreements of $566, of which $245 will be paid in 2025 and the remainder will be paid thereafter. On a quarterly basis, we record the greater of the cumulative actual content costs incurred or the cumulative minimum guarantee based on forecasts for the minimum guarantee period. The minimum guarantee period is the period of time that the minimum guarantee relates to, as specified in each agreement, which may be annual or a longer period. The cumulative minimum guarantee, based on forecasts, considers factors such as listening hours, downloads, revenue, subscribers and other terms of each agreement that impact our expected attainment or recoupment of the minimum guarantees based on the relative attribution method. We have entered into certain tax equity investments in which we expect to make future contributions. These future contributions are expected to be made over the remaining respective terms of the investments and totaled $680 as of June 30, 2025, of which $33 is expected to be paid in 2025 and the remainder thereafter. Several of our content agreements also include provisions related to the royalty payments and structures of those agreements relative to other content licensing arrangements, which, if triggered, cause our payments under those agreements to escalate. In addition, record labels, publishers and performing rights organizations with whom we have entered into direct license agreements have the right to audit our content payments, and such audits often result in disputes over whether we have paid the proper content costs. We have also entered into various agreements with third parties for general operating purposes. In addition to the minimum contractual cash commitments described above, we have entered into other variable cost arrangements. These future costs are dependent upon many factors and are difficult to anticipate; however, these costs may be substantial. We may enter into additional programming, distribution, marketing and other agreements that contain similar variable cost provisions. We do not have any other significant off-balance sheet financing arrangements that are reasonably likely to have a material effect on our financial condition, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources. Legal Proceedings In the ordinary course of business, we are a defendant or party to various claims and lawsuits, including those discussed below. We record a liability when we believe that it is both probable that a liability will be incurred, and the amount of loss can be reasonably estimated. We evaluate developments in legal matters that could affect the amount of liability that has been previously accrued and make adjustments as appropriate. Significant judgment is required to determine both probability and the estimated amount of a loss or potential loss. We may be unable to reasonably estimate the possible loss or range of loss for a particular legal contingency for various reasons, including, among others, because: (i) the damages sought are indeterminate; (ii) the proceedings are in the relative early stages; (iii) there is uncertainty as to the outcome of pending proceedings (including motions and appeals); (iv) there is uncertainty as to the likelihood of settlement and the outcome of any negotiations with respect thereto; (v) there remain significant factual issues to be determined or resolved; (vi) the relevant law is unsettled; or (vii) the proceedings involve novel or untested legal theories. In such instances, there may be considerable uncertainty regarding the ultimate resolution of such matters, including the likelihood or magnitude of a possible eventual loss, if any. New York State v. Sirius XM Radio Inc. On December 20, 2023, the People of the State of New York, by Letitia James, Attorney General of the State of New York (the “NY AG”), filed a petition (the “Petition”) in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, New York County (the “New York Court”), against Sirius XM. The Petition alleges various violations of New York law and the federal Restore Online Shoppers’ Confidence Act (“ROSCA”) arising out of Sirius XM's subscription cancellation practices. In general, the Petition alleged that Sirius XM requires consumers to devote an excessive amount of time to cancel subscriptions and has not implemented cancellation processes that are simple and efficient. The Petition claimed to be brought under certain provisions of New York law that authorize the NY AG to initiate special proceedings seeking injunctive and other equitable relief in cases of persistent business fraud or illegality. The Petition sought: a permanent injunction against violating provisions of New York law and ROSCA arising out of the alleged deceptive practices associated with Sirius XM's subscription cancellation procedures; an accounting of each consumer who cancelled, or sought to cancel, a satellite radio subscription, including the duration of the cancel interaction and the funds collected from such consumers after that interaction; monetary restitution and damages to aggrieved consumers; disgorgement of all profits resulting from the alleged improper acts; civil penalties and the NY AG’s costs. Sirius XM filed an Answer to the Petition and cross moved for summary judgment with respect to various claims asserted in the Petition. In November 2024, the New York Court granted Sirius XM summary judgment on all but one of the NY AG's claims. The New York Court did find that Sirius XM's cancellation practices violated the “simple mechanism requirement” for subscription cancellations contained in ROSCA. As a result of the New York Court's findings, Sirius XM now permits New York residents who purchase a subscription online to also cancel that subscription online, a cancellation mechanism that we believe is at least as easy to use as the method the consumer used to initiate the subscription. The New York Court also directed the NY AG to make ministerial filings in order to proceed to an assessment of damages. The NY AG has appealed to the four counts with respect to the Petition for which the New York Court granted Sirius XM summary judgment. Sirius XM has appealed the one count in the Petition, the violation of ROSCA, with respect to which the New York Court granted the State of New York summary judgment. Sirius XM believes it has substantial defenses to the action and intends to defend this action vigorously. U.S. Music Royalty Fee Actions and Mass Arbitrations. Commencing in 2023, a number of putative class actions and mass arbitration demands have been commenced against Sirius XM relating to its pricing, billing and subscription marketing practices. Although each class action and mass arbitration demand contains unique allegations, in general, the actions and arbitrations allege that Sirius XM falsely advertised its music subscription plans at lower prices than it actually charges, that it allegedly did not disclose its “U.S. Music Royalty Fee”, and that Sirius XM has taken other actions to prevent customers from discovering the existence, amount and nature of the U.S. Music Royalty Fee in violation of various state consumer protection laws. The plaintiffs and claimants seek disgorgement, restitution and/or damages in the aggregate amount of U.S. Music Royalty Fees paid by customers, as well as statutory and punitive damages where available. The following actions and mass arbitration demands remain pending against Sirius XM: •On June 5, 2023, Christopher Carovillano and Steven Brandt, individually, as private attorneys general, and on behalf of all other U.S. persons similarly situated (excluding persons in the states of California, New Jersey and Washington), filed a class action complaint against Sirius XM in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (the “Southern District Court”). On July 18, 2024, the Southern District Court issued an Opinion and Order granting Sirius XM's motion for partial summary judgment and striking the plaintiffs' class allegations. On January 3, 2025, Sirius XM filed another motion for summary judgment as to plaintiff's remaining individual claims and plaintiffs have opposed that motion. On January 15, 2025 plaintiffs filed a motion to dismiss their own case that Sirius XM has opposed. Decisions on those motions remain pending. •On June 1, 2024, Elenamarie Burns, Jacqueline Gardner, and Lynne Silver filed a petition on behalf of 7,628 individuals in the Commercial Division of the Supreme Court of New York, County of New York (the “Commercial Division”), seeking to compel Sirius XM to arbitrate and advance the payment of American Arbitration Association (the "AAA") arbitration fees in connection with individual arbitrations. On July 3, 2024 and March 24, 2025, petitioners filed amended petitions adding petitioners, now totaling approximately 12,000. Petitioners’ opening brief in support of the amended petition was filed on April 18, 2025, and Sirius XM’s opposition to the amended petition was filed on July 1, 2025. The Commercial Division has not taken any action in connection with the merits of the amended petition. •On June 14, 2024, Kara Kirkpatrick, Gillian Maxfield, Anna Demarco and Cody Michael, individually and on behalf of all other Oregon persons similarly situated, filed a class action complaint against Sirius XM in the United States District Court for the District of Oregon. Sirius XM moved to dismiss the complaint on April 2, 2025, and plaintiffs have opposed that motion. A decision on that motion remains pending. •On June 21, 2024, Cindy Balmores, Justin Braswell, Deborah Garvin, and Thea Anderson, individually, as private attorneys general, and on behalf of all other Washington persons similarly situated, filed a class action complaint against Sirius XM in the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington. Sirius XM moved to dismiss the complaint on March 31, 2025. On July 14, 2025, the Court granted the motion in part, and denied the motion in part. •On June 25, 2024, Denise Woods and Sherry Tapia, individually, as private attorneys general, and on behalf of all other California persons similarly situated, filed a class action complaint against Sirius XM in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. Sirius XM moved to compel arbitration on March 21, 2025. On July 11, 2025, the Court denied the motion. •On May 15, 2025, Cynthia Stutsman and Michael Peterson, individually, and on behalf of all other Washington residents similarly situated, filed a class action complaint against Sirius XM in the Superior Court of Washington for Snohomish County. •Commencing in June 2023, various law firms began filing mass arbitration claims against Sirius XM before the AAA. Collectively, the law firms purport to act on behalf of approximately 70,000 claimants. Several of the law firms have asserted additional causes of action under the Electronic Funds Transfer Act. Sirius XM believes it has substantial defenses to the claims asserted in these actions and arbitrations, and it intends to defend these actions vigorously. California Unruh Civil Rights Act Mass Arbitration. A series of mass pre-arbitration notices have been filed purportedly on behalf of approximately 41,000 claimants alleging that Pandora used age, sex and gender information from claimants to target advertising in violation of California’s Unruh Civil Rights Act, Cal. Civ. Code §§ 51–52. A petition was filed purportedly on behalf of approximately 26,000 petitioners for an Order Compelling Arbitration in Los Angeles Superior Court against Pandora on January 17, 2025, and an amended petition was filed on February 14, 2025. On June 18, 2025, the Court denied the petition in part with respect to 2,216 petitioners and granted the petition in part and entered an order compelling arbitration with respect to the remaining petitioners. Do-Not-Call Litigation. In July 2025, following a mediation, Sirius XM entered into an agreement settling a putative class action lawsuit filed on November 29, 2022 in the United States District Court for the Central District of Illinois alleging that Sirius XM violated the “Do-Not-Call” provisions of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (the “TCPA”), and several similar state statutes, by calling consumers whose residential numbers were on applicable national or state do-not-call registries and/or whose residential numbers were on Sirius XM’s internal do-not-call list. The settlement will resolve the claims of consumers for the period April 27, 2019 through October 31, 2025. As part of the settlement, in calendar year 2026, Sirius XM will pay $28 million into a non-reversionary settlement fund from which cash to class members, notice, administrative costs, and attorney's fees and costs will be paid. The settlement memorializes changes relating to Sirius XM’s “Do-Not-Call” practices. Settlement of this matter is subject to, among other things, approval by the Court. Other Matters. In the ordinary course of business, Sirius XM Holdings, Sirius XM and its subsidiaries, such as Pandora, are defendants in various other lawsuits, mass arbitration and individual arbitration proceedings, including derivative actions; actions filed by subscribers, both on behalf of themselves and on a class action basis; former employees; parties to contracts or leases and owners of purported patents, trademarks, copyrights or other intellectual property. None of these other matters, in our opinion, is likely to have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.

X
- References No definition available. + Details
Name: | us-gaap_CommitmentsAndContingenciesDisclosureAbstract
Namespace Prefix: | us-gaap_
Data Type: | xbrli:stringItemType
Balance Type: | na
Period Type: | duration

X
- Definition The entire disclosure for commitments and contingencies. + References Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2009/role/commonPracticeRef -Topic 405 -SubTopic 30 -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Publisher FASB -URI https://asc.fasb.org/405-30/tableOfContent Reference 2: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/disclosureRef -Topic 440 -SubTopic 10 -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Section 50 -Paragraph 4 -Subparagraph (a) -Publisher FASB -URI https://asc.fasb.org/1943274/2147482648/440-10-50-4 Reference 3: http://www.xbrl.org/2009/role/commonPracticeRef -Topic 450 -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Publisher FASB -URI https://asc.fasb.org/450/tableOfContent Reference 4: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/disclosureRef -Topic 954 -SubTopic 440 -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Section 50 -Paragraph 1 -Subparagraph (a) -Publisher FASB -URI https://asc.fasb.org/1943274/2147478522/954-440-50-1 Reference 5: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/disclosureRef -Topic 440 -SubTopic 10 -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Section 50 -Paragraph 4 -Subparagraph (c) -Publisher FASB -URI https://asc.fasb.org/1943274/2147482648/440-10-50-4 Reference 6: http://fasb.org/us-gaap/role/ref/legacyRef -Topic 440 -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Publisher FASB -URI https://asc.fasb.org/440/tableOfContent + Details
Name: | us-gaap_CommitmentsAndContingenciesDisclosureTextBlock
Namespace Prefix: | us-gaap_
Data Type: | dtr-types:textBlockItemType
Balance Type: | na
Period Type: | duration