Fair Value Measurements

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2016

The following table provides information on assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis. No material events occurred during the three months ended March 31, 2016 requiring adjustment to the recognized balances of assets or liabilities which are recorded at fair value on a nonrecurring basis.



	Carrying Amount in Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets				Fair Value Measurements Using
	Carrying Amount in Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets		Fair Value		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
(in thousands)	March 31, 2016
Cash and cash equivalents	$	122,256	$	122,256	$	122,256	$	0	$	0
Cash deposit for collateralized interest rate swap	27,335		27,335		27,335		0		0
Interest rate swap liability	23,106		23,106		0		23,106		0


	December 31, 2015
Cash and cash equivalents	$	93,424	$	93,424	$	93,424	$	0	$	0
Cash deposit for collateralized interest rate swap	26,130		26,130		26,130		0		0
Interest rate swap liability	21,734		21,734		0		21,734		0

The fair value of the interest rate swap is determined using the market standard methodology of netting the discounted future fixed cash receipts and the discounted expected variable cash payments. The analysis reflects the contractual term of the derivative, including the period to maturity. The variable cash payments are based on an expectation of future interest rates derived from observable market interest rate curves. In determining the fair value measurements, we incorporate credit valuation adjustments to appropriately reflect both our nonperformance risk and the counterparties’ nonperformance risk.

Although we have determined that the majority of the inputs used to value our derivative fall within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy, the credit valuation adjustment associated with the derivative utilizes Level 3 inputs. These Level 3 inputs include estimates of current credit spreads to evaluate the likelihood of default by both us and the counterparties to the derivative. As of March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, we have assessed the significance of the impact of the credit valuation adjustment on the overall valuation of our derivative and have determined that the credit valuation adjustment is not significant to the overall valuation of the derivative. Accordingly, we have determined that our derivative valuation should be classified in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.

We have made an accounting policy election to measure credit risk of any derivative financial instruments subject to master netting agreements on a net basis by counterparty portfolio.

Long-term debt – We record the carrying amount of our long-term debt at historical cost, less deferred financing costs related to the senior notes. The estimated fair value of our long-term debt is shown in the table below and is based primarily on estimated current rates available to us for debt of the same remaining duration and adjusted for nonperformance risk and credit risk. The estimated fair value of our publicly-traded senior notes included in long-term debt in the table below is based on quoted prices as of March 31, 2016. The fair value is categorized as Level 2.



	March 31, 2016				December 31, 2015
(in thousands)	Carrying Amount		Fair Value		Carrying Amount		Fair Value
Long-term debt (excluding capital lease obligation)	$	536,066	$	551,512	$	490,920	$	515,302

- Definition

The entire disclosure for the fair value of financial instruments (as defined), including financial assets and financial liabilities (collectively, as defined), and the measurements of those instruments as well as disclosures related to the fair value of non-financial assets and liabilities. Such disclosures about the financial instruments, assets, and liabilities would include: (1) the fair value of the required items together with their carrying amounts (as appropriate); (2) for items for which it is not practicable to estimate fair value, disclosure would include: (a) information pertinent to estimating fair value (including, carrying amount, effective interest rate, and maturity, and (b) the reasons why it is not practicable to estimate fair value; (3) significant concentrations of credit risk including: (a) information about the activity, region, or economic characteristics identifying a concentration, (b) the maximum amount of loss the entity is exposed to based on the gross fair value of the related item, (c) policy for requiring collateral or other security and information as to accessing such collateral or security, and (d) the nature and brief description of such collateral or security; (4) quantitative information about market risks and how such risks are managed; (5) for items measured on both a recurring and nonrecurring basis information regarding the inputs used to develop the fair value measurement; and (6) for items presented in the financial statement for which fair value measurement is elected: (a) information necessary to understand the reasons for the election, (b) discussion of the effect of fair value changes on earnings, (c) a description of [similar groups] items for which the election is made and the relation thereof to the balance sheet, the aggregate carrying value of items included in the balance sheet that are not eligible for the election; (7) all other required (as defined) and desired information.

+ References + Details