XML 63 R11.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT
v2.4.0.6

3. Fair Value Measurements | 12 Months Ended
--- | ---
Dec. 31, 2012
Fair Value Measures And Disclosures |
Fair Value Measurements | 3. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS We determine the fair value of an asset or liability based on the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The identification of market participant assumptions provides a basis for determining what inputs are to be used for pricing each asset or liability. A fair value hierarchy has been established which gives precedence to fair value measurements calculated using observable inputs over those using unobservable inputs. This hierarchy prioritizes the inputs into three broad levels as follows:
• | Level 1: Quoted prices in active markets for identical instruments
• | Level 2: Other significant observable inputs (including quoted prices in active markets for similar instruments)
• | Level 3: Significant unobservable inputs (including assumptions in determining the fair value of certain investments)
Financial assets and liabilities carried at fair value and measured on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2012 are classified in the hierarchy as follows (in millions):
| Level 1 |  | Level 2 |  | Level 3 |  | Total
Financial Assets Carried at Fair Value: |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Cash equivalents (a): |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Commercial paper | $ | — |  |  | $ | 52.8 |  |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | 52.8 |
Foreign time deposits | 10.1 |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 10.1 |
U.S. government sponsored agencies | — |  |  | 1.3 |  |  | — |  |  | 1.3 |
Money market funds | 5.5 |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 5.5 |
Total cash equivalents | 15.6 |  |  | 54.1 |  |  | — |  |  | 69.7 |
Available-for-sale investments (b): |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Corporate debt securities | — |  |  | 240.6 |  |  | — |  |  | 240.6 |
Foreign brokered certificates of deposit | — |  |  | 0.4 |  |  | — |  |  | 0.4 |
U.S. government sponsored agencies | — |  |  | 92.7 |  |  | — |  |  | 92.7 |
Foreign government obligations | — |  |  | 5.6 |  |  | — |  |  | 5.6 |
Municipal obligations | — |  |  | 12.1 |  |  | — |  |  | 12.1 |
Marketable equity securities | 242.1 |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 242.1 |
Asset-backed securities | — |  |  | 82.2 |  |  | — |  |  | 82.2 |
Total available-for-sale investments | 242.1 |  |  | 433.6 |  |  | — |  |  | 675.7 |
Forward foreign exchange contracts (c) | — |  |  | 1.1 |  |  | — |  |  | 1.1 |
Total financial assets carried at fair value | $ | 257.7 |  |  | $ | 488.8 |  |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | 746.5 |
Financial Liabilities Carried at Fair Value: |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Forward foreign exchange contracts (d) | $ | — |  |  | $ | 0.8 |  |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | 0.8 |
Contingent consideration (e) | — |  |  | — |  |  | 52.6 |  |  | 52.6 |
Total financial liabilities carried at fair value | $ | — |  |  | $ | 0.8 |  |  | $ | 52.6 |  |  | $ | 53.4 |
Financial assets and liabilities carried at fair value and measured on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2011 are classified in the hierarchy as follows (in millions):
| Level 1 |  | Level 2 |  | Level 3 |  | Total
Financial Assets Carried at Fair Value: |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Cash equivalents (a): |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Commercial paper | $ | — |  |  | $ | 106.0 |  |  | — |  |  | $ | 106.0 |
Bonds | — |  |  | 8.6 |  |  | — |  |  | 8.6 |
Foreign time deposits | 21.6 |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 21.6 |
Money market funds | 58.3 |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 58.3 |
Total cash equivalents | 79.9 |  |  | 114.6 |  |  | — |  |  | 194.5 |
Available-for-sale investments (b): |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Corporate debt securities | — |  |  | 170.6 |  |  | — |  |  | 170.6 |
Foreign brokered certificates of deposit | — |  |  | 1.8 |  |  | — |  |  | 1.8 |
U.S. government sponsored agencies | — |  |  | 36.9 |  |  | — |  |  | 36.9 |
Foreign government obligations | — |  |  | 5.7 |  |  | — |  |  | 5.7 |
Municipal obligations | — |  |  | 5.0 |  |  | — |  |  | 5.0 |
Marketable equity securities | 134.8 |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 134.8 |
Asset-backed securities | — |  |  | 11.2 |  |  | — |  |  | 11.2 |
Total available-for-sale investments | 134.8 |  |  | 231.2 |  |  | — |  |  | 366.0 |
Forward foreign exchange contracts (c) | — |  |  | 0.8 |  |  | — |  |  | 0.8 |
Total financial assets carried at fair value | $ | 214.7 |  |  | $ | 346.6 |  |  | — |  |  | $ | 561.3 |
Financial Liabilities Carried at Fair Value: |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Forward foreign exchange contracts (d) | $ | — |  |  | $ | 1.2 |  |  | — |  |  | $ | 1.2 |
Contingent consideration (e) | — |  |  | — |  |  | 24.1 |  |  | 24.1 |
Total financial liabilities carried at fair value | $ | — |  |  | $ | 1.2 |  |  | $ | 24.1 |  |  | $ | 25.3 |
(a) | Cash equivalents are included in Cash and cash equivalents in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
(b) | Available-for-sale investments are included in the following accounts in the Consolidated Balance Sheets (in millions):
| December 31, 2012 |  | December 31, 2011
Short-term investments | $ | 457.7 |  |  | $ | 238.8 |
Other assets | 218.0 |  |  | 127.2 |
Total | $ | 675.7 |  |  | $ | 366.0 |
(c) | Forward foreign exchange contracts in an asset position are included in Prepaid expenses, taxes and other current assets in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
(d) | Forward foreign exchange contracts in a liability position are included in Other current liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
(e) | Contingent consideration liability is included in the following accounts in the Consolidated Balance Sheet (in millions):
| December 31, 2012 |  | December 31, 2011
Other current liabilities | $ | 27.3 |  |  | $ | 8.5 |
Other long-term liabilities | 25.3 |  |  | 15.6 |
Total | $ | 52.6 |  |  | $ | 24.1 |
During the fourth quarter of 2011, we recognized a contingent consideration liability upon our acquisition of QuantaLife, related to potential future payments due upon the achievement of certain sales and development milestones. The contingent consideration was initially recognized at its estimated fair value of $24.1 million, based on a probability-weighted income approach. The contingent consideration was recognized at its estimated fair value of $8.0 million and $24.1 million as of December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively. At October 4, 2011, the contingent consideration could have originally reached a maximum of $48 million upon the achievement of all sales milestones and a development milestone. As of December 31, 2012, the first three short-term sales milestones were not met and therefore the contingent consideration can now only reach a maximum of $37 million upon the achievement of all the remaining sales and development milestones. The development milestone was met as of December 31, 2012, resulting in a payment of $6 million in January 2013. During the third quarter of 2012, we recognized a contingent consideration liability upon our acquisition of a new cell sorting system from Propel Labs, Inc. The contingent consideration was recognized at its estimated fair value of $44.6 million as of December 31, 2012, based on a probability-weighted income approach related to the achievement of certain development and sales milestones valued at $19.9 million and $24.7 million, respectively. The development milestone could potentially reach a maximum of $20 million, which we consider the probability to be more than likely of achieving the milestones. This form of payment guarantees that the seller transitions the manufacturing of the product to Bio-Rad. The sales milestone could potentially range from $0 to a maximum of 60.0%, 56.7% and 54.4% of annual cell sorting system purchase orders, and payment to occur upon the anniversary of the completion of a certain number of cell sorting systems for three consecutive years, respectively. These maximum payout ratios begin at annual cell sorting system purchase orders in excess of $20 million, $30 million and $45 million for the three consecutive years, respectively. The following table provides a reconciliation of the Level 3 contingent consideration liabilities measured at fair value based on third party valuations for the year ended December 31, 2012 (in millions):
| 2012
January 1 | $ | 24.1 |
Decrease in fair value of contingent consideration for QuantaLife included in Selling, general and administrative expense | (16.1 | )
Total QuantaLife | 8.0 |
Acquisition of cell sorting system | 44.6 |
December 31 | $ | 52.6 |
The decrease in the contingent consideration liability for QuantaLife was primarily due to not achieving the first three short-term sales milestones as a result of recent weakening in funding to the research and development markets and a longer sales cycle for this new technology, causing a revision in sales forecasts for the remaining sales milestone contractual period ending in March 2014. The following table provides quantitative information about Level 3 inputs for fair value measurement of our contingent consideration liabilities as of December 31, 2012. Significant increases or decreases in these inputs in isolation could result in a significantly lower or higher fair value measurement.
|  |  | Range
| Valuation Technique | Unobservable Input | From | To
QuantaLife | Probability-weighted income approach | Sales milestone: |  |
|  | Credit adjusted discount rates | 0.64% | 1.03%
|  | Projected volatility of growth rate | 12.4% | 30%
|  | Market price of risk | 0.4% | N/A
Cell sorting system | Probability-weighted income approach | Sales milestone: |  |
|  | Credit adjusted discount rates | 1.0% | 1.7%
|  | Projected volatility of sales | 18.0% |
|  | Market price of risk | 1.4% | N/A
|  | Development milestone: |  |
|  | Probability | 99% | 100%
|  | Risk-adjusted discount rate | 0.8% | 1.0%
To estimate the fair value of Level 2 debt securities as of December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, our primary pricing service relies on inputs from multiple industry-recognized pricing sources to determine the price for each investment. In addition, our pricing service performed reasonableness testing of their prices on a daily basis by comparing them to the prices reported by our custodians as well as prior day prices. If the price difference fell outside of predetermined tolerable levels, they investigated the cause and resolved the pricing issue. Based on a review of the results of this analysis, we utilized our primary pricing service for all Level 2 debt securities as none of these securities tested outside of the tolerable levels. As of December 31, 2012, our primary pricing service inputs for Level 2 U.S. government sponsored agencies, municipal obligations, corporate and foreign government bonds, asset-backed securities and related cash equivalents consisted of market prices from a variety of industry standard data providers, security master files from large financial institutions and other third-party sources. These multiple market prices were used by our primary pricing service as inputs into a distribution-curve based algorithm to determine the daily market value. As of December 31, 2012, our primary pricing service inputs for Level 2 corporate debt securities (commercial paper), bank deposits and related cash equivalents consisted of dynamic and static security characteristics information obtained from several independent sources of security data. The dynamic inputs such as credit rating, factor and variable-rate, were updated daily. The static characteristics included inputs such as day count and first coupon upon initial security creation. These securities were typically priced utilizing mathematical calculations reliant on these observable inputs. Other available-for-sale foreign government obligations were based on indicative bids from market participants. As of December 31, 2011, our primary pricing service inputs for Level 2 cash equivalents (bonds), U.S. government sponsored agencies, municipal obligations, corporate debt securities (bonds) and asset-backed securities consisted of market prices from a variety of industry standard data providers, security master files from large financial institutions and other third-party sources. These multiple market prices were used by our primary pricing service as inputs into a distribution-curve based algorithm to determine the daily market value. As of December 31, 2011, our primary pricing service inputs for Level 2 cash equivalents (commercial paper), corporate debt securities (commercial paper), foreign government obligations (commercial paper) and time deposits consisted of dynamic and static security characteristics information obtained from several independent sources of security data. The dynamic inputs such as credit rating, factor and variable-rate, were updated daily. The static characteristics included inputs such as day count and first coupon upon initial security creation. These securities were typically priced via mathematical calculations reliant on these observable inputs. Other available-for-sale foreign government obligations were based on indicative bids from market participants. Available-for-sale investments consist of the following (in millions):
| December 31, 2012
| Amortized Cost |  | Unrealized Gains |  | Unrealized Losses |  | Estimated Fair Value
Short-term investments: |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Corporate debt securities | $ | 239.3 |  |  | $ | 1.4 |  |  | $ | (0.1 | ) |  | $ | 240.6 |
Foreign brokered certificates of deposit | 0.4 |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 0.4 |
Municipal obligations | 12.0 |  |  | 0.1 |  |  | — |  |  | 12.1 |
Asset-backed securities | 81.6 |  |  | 0.4 |  |  | (0.1 | ) |  | 81.9 |
U.S. government sponsored agencies | 92.5 |  |  | 0.3 |  |  | (0.1 | ) |  | 92.7 |
Foreign government obligations | 5.4 |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 5.4 |
Marketable equity securities | 24.1 |  |  | 0.7 |  |  | (0.2 | ) |  | 24.6 |
| 455.3 |  |  | 2.9 |  |  | (0.5 | ) |  | 457.7 |
Long-term investments: |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Marketable equity securities | 54.5 |  |  | 163.0 |  |  | — |  |  | 217.5 |
Asset-backed securities | 0.4 |  |  | — |  |  | (0.1 | ) |  | 0.3 |
Foreign government obligations | 0.2 |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 0.2 |
| 55.1 |  |  | 163.0 |  |  | (0.1 | ) |  | 218.0 |
Total | $ | 510.4 |  |  | $ | 165.9 |  |  | $ | (0.6 | ) |  | $ | 675.7 |
| December 31, 2011
| Amortized Cost |  | Unrealized Gains |  | Unrealized Losses |  | Estimated Fair Value
Short-term investments: |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Corporate debt securities | $ | 170.9 |  |  | $ | 0.1 |  |  | $ | (0.4 | ) |  | $ | 170.6 |
Foreign brokered certificates of deposit | 1.8 |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 1.8 |
Municipal obligations | 5.0 |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 5.0 |
Asset-backed securities | 10.8 |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 10.8 |
U.S. government sponsored agencies | 36.8 |  |  | 0.1 |  |  | — |  |  | 36.9 |
Foreign government obligations | 5.4 |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 5.4 |
Marketable equity securities | 7.7 |  |  | 0.6 |  |  | — |  |  | 8.3 |
| 238.4 |  |  | 0.8 |  |  | (0.4 | ) |  | 238.8 |
Long-term investments: |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Marketable equity securities | 57.2 |  |  | 70.0 |  |  | (0.7 | ) |  | 126.5 |
Asset-backed securities | 0.5 |  |  | — |  |  | (0.1 | ) |  | 0.4 |
Foreign government obligations | 0.3 |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 0.3 |
| 58.0 |  |  | 70.0 |  |  | (0.8 | ) |  | 127.2 |
Total | $ | 296.4 |  |  | $ | 70.8 |  |  | $ | (1.2 | ) |  | $ | 366.0 |
The following is a summary of investments with gross unrealized losses and the associated fair value (in millions):
| December 31, 2012 |  | December 31, 2011
Fair value | $ | 99.3 |  |  | $ | 77.8 |
Gross unrealized losses for investments in a loss position 12 months or more | $ | 0.1 |  |  | $ | 0.4 |
Gross unrealized losses for investments in a loss position less than 12 months | $ | 0.5 |  |  | $ | 0.8 |
The unrealized losses on these securities are due to a number of factors, including changes in interest rates, changes in economic conditions and changes in market outlook for various industries, among others. Because Bio-Rad has the ability and intent to hold these investments with unrealized losses until a recovery of fair value, or for a reasonable period of time sufficient for a forecasted recovery of fair value, which may be maturity, we do not consider these investments to be other-than-temporarily impaired at December 31, 2012 or at December 31, 2011. Forward foreign exchange contracts: As part of distributing our products, we regularly enter into intercompany transactions. We enter into forward foreign currency exchange contracts to manage foreign exchange risk of future movements in foreign exchange rates that affect foreign currency denominated intercompany receivables and payables. We do not use derivative financial instruments for speculative or trading purposes. We do not seek hedge accounting treatment for these contracts. As a result, these contracts, generally with maturity dates of 90 days or less and denominated primarily in currencies of industrial countries, are recorded at their fair value at each balance sheet date. The notional principal amounts provide one measure of the transaction volume outstanding as of December 31, 2012 and do not represent the amount of Bio-Rad's exposure to loss. The estimated fair value of these contracts was derived using the spot rates published in the Wall Street Journal on the last business day of the quarter and the points provided by counterparties. The resulting gains or losses offset exchange gains or losses on the related receivables and payables, both of which are included in Foreign exchange losses, net in the Consolidated Statements of Income. The cash flows related to these contracts are classified as Cash flows from investing activities in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows The following is a summary of our forward foreign currency exchange contracts (in millions):
| December 31,
| 2012
Contracts maturing in January through March 2013 to sell foreign currency: |
Notional value | $ | 67.2 |
Unrealized loss | $ | (0.2 | )
Contracts maturing in January through March 2013 to purchase foreign currency: |
Notional value | $ | 389.1 |
Unrealized gain | $ | 0.4 |
The following is a summary of the amortized cost and estimated fair value of our debt securities at December 31, 2012 by contractual maturity date (in millions):
| Amortized Cost |  | Estimated Fair Value
Mature in less than one year | $ | 159.2 |  |  | $ | 159.3 |
Mature in one to five years | 204.8 |  |  | 205.6 |
Mature in more than five years | 67.8 |  |  | 68.7 |
Total | $ | 431.8 |  |  | $ | 433.6 |
The estimated fair value of financial instruments in the table below has been determined using quoted prices in active markets for identical instruments or other significant observable inputs, including quoted prices in active markets for similar instruments. Estimates are not necessarily indicative of the amounts that could be realized in a current market exchange as considerable judgment is required in interpreting market data used to develop estimates of fair value. The use of different market assumptions or estimation techniques could have a material effect on the estimated fair value. Other assets include some financial instruments that have fair values based on market quotations. Long-term debt, excluding leases and current maturities, has an estimated fair value based on quoted market prices for the same or similar issues. The estimated fair value of our financial instruments and the level of the fair value hierarchy within which the fair value measurement is categorized are as follows (in millions):
| December 31, 2012 |  | December 31, 2011
| Carrying Amount |  | Estimated Fair Value |  | Fair Value Hierarchy Level |  | Carrying Amount |  | Estimated Fair Value |  | Fair Value Hierarchy Level
Other assets | $ | 293.6 |  |  | $ | 497.8 |  |  | 1 |  | $ | 186.6 |  |  | $ | 252.4 |  |  | 1
Total long-term debt, excluding leases and current maturities | $ | 720.0 |  |  | $ | 778.4 |  |  | 2 |  | $ | 719.1 |  |  | $ | 759.1 |  |  | 2
We own shares of ordinary voting stock of Sartorius AG (Sartorius), of Goettingen, Germany, a process technology supplier to the biotechnology, pharmaceutical, chemical and food and beverage industries. We own over 30% of the outstanding voting shares (excluding treasury shares) of Sartorius as of December 31, 2012. The Sartorius family trust and Sartorius family members hold a controlling interest of the outstanding voting shares. We do not have any representative or designee on Sartorius’ board of directors, nor do we have the ability to exercise significant influence over the operating and financial policies of Sartorius. In addition, the ordinary voting stock of Sartorius is thinly traded. Therefore, we account for this investment using the cost method. The carrying value of this investment is included in Other assets in our Consolidated Balance Sheets.

X
- Details
Name: | bio_FairValueMeasuresAndDisclosures
Namespace Prefix: | bio_
Data Type: | xbrli:stringItemType
Balance Type: | na
Period Type: | duration

X
- Definition The entire disclosure for the fair value of financial instruments (as defined), including financial assets and financial liabilities (collectively, as defined), and the measurements of those instruments as well as disclosures related to the fair value of non-financial assets and liabilities. Such disclosures about the financial instruments, assets, and liabilities would include: (1) the fair value of the required items together with their carrying amounts (as appropriate); (2) for items for which it is not practicable to estimate fair value, disclosure would include: (a) information pertinent to estimating fair value (including, carrying amount, effective interest rate, and maturity, and (b) the reasons why it is not practicable to estimate fair value; (3) significant concentrations of credit risk including: (a) information about the activity, region, or economic characteristics identifying a concentration, (b) the maximum amount of loss the entity is exposed to based on the gross fair value of the related item, (c) policy for requiring collateral or other security and information as to accessing such collateral or security, and (d) the nature and brief description of such collateral or security; (4) quantitative information about market risks and how such risks are managed; (5) for items measured on both a recurring and nonrecurring basis information regarding the inputs used to develop the fair value measurement; and (6) for items presented in the financial statement for which fair value measurement is elected: (a) information necessary to understand the reasons for the election, (b) discussion of the effect of fair value changes on earnings, (c) a description of [similar groups] items for which the election is made and the relation thereof to the balance sheet, the aggregate carrying value of items included in the balance sheet that are not eligible for the election; (7) all other required (as defined) and desired information. + References Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 825 -SubTopic 10 -Section 50 -Paragraph 16 -URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=7491637&loc=d3e13504-108611 Reference 2: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (FAS) -Number 107 -Paragraph 15C, 15D -LegacyDoc This reference is SUPERSEDED by the Accounting Standards Codification effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. This reference is included to help users transition from the previous accounting hierarchy and will be removed from future versions of this taxonomy. Reference 3: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (FAS) -Number 133 -Paragraph 44A, 44B -LegacyDoc This reference is SUPERSEDED by the Accounting Standards Codification effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. This reference is included to help users transition from the previous accounting hierarchy and will be removed from future versions of this taxonomy. Reference 4: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (FAS) -Number 107 -Paragraph 15A -Subparagraph a-d -LegacyDoc This reference is SUPERSEDED by the Accounting Standards Codification effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. This reference is included to help users transition from the previous accounting hierarchy and will be removed from future versions of this taxonomy. Reference 5: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (FAS) -Number 107 -Paragraph 3, 10, 14, 15 -LegacyDoc This reference is SUPERSEDED by the Accounting Standards Codification effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. This reference is included to help users transition from the previous accounting hierarchy and will be removed from future versions of this taxonomy. Reference 6: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 825 -SubTopic 10 -Section 50 -Paragraph 10 -URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=7491637&loc=d3e13433-108611 Reference 7: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (FAS) -Number 159 -Paragraph 17-22, 27, 28 -LegacyDoc This reference is SUPERSEDED by the Accounting Standards Codification effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. This reference is included to help users transition from the previous accounting hierarchy and will be removed from future versions of this taxonomy. Reference 8: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 825 -SubTopic 10 -Section 50 -Paragraph 21 -URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=7491637&loc=d3e13537-108611 Reference 9: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (FAS) -Number 107 -Paragraph 15B -Subparagraph a, b -LegacyDoc This reference is SUPERSEDED by the Accounting Standards Codification effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. This reference is included to help users transition from the previous accounting hierarchy and will be removed from future versions of this taxonomy. Reference 10: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (FAS) -Number 157 -Paragraph 32, 33, 34 -LegacyDoc This reference is SUPERSEDED by the Accounting Standards Codification effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. This reference is included to help users transition from the previous accounting hierarchy and will be removed from future versions of this taxonomy. Reference 11: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 820 -SubTopic 10 -Section 50 -Paragraph 2 -URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=7578670&loc=d3e19207-110258 Reference 12: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 825 -SubTopic 10 -Section 50 -Paragraph 28 -URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6957238&loc=d3e14064-108612 Reference 13: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 825 -SubTopic 10 -Section 50 -Paragraph 30 -URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6957238&loc=d3e14172-108612 + Details
Name: | us-gaap_FairValueDisclosuresTextBlock
Namespace Prefix: | us-gaap_
Data Type: | nonnum:textBlockItemType
Balance Type: | na
Period Type: | duration