10-Q 1 a10q93013r.htm 10-Q

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q

(Mark One) |
ý | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2013
or

¨ | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from______________to __________
Commission file number 1-7928
BIO-RAD LABORATORIES, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware |  | 94-1381833
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |  | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
1000 Alfred Nobel Drive, Hercules, California |  | 94547
(Address of principal executive offices) |  | (Zip Code)

(510) 724-7000
(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)
No Change
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report.)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

| Yes x | No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232,405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

| Yes x | No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer | x |  | Accelerated filer | o
Non-accelerated filer | o | (Do not check if smaller reporting company) | Smaller reporting company | o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

| Yes o | No x

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.

Title of Class |  | Shares Outstanding at November 4, 2013
Class A Common Stock, Par Value $0.0001 per share |  | 23,605,496
Class B Common Stock, Par Value $0.0001 per share |  | 5,089,371

BIO-RAD LABORATORIES, INC.
FORM 10-Q SEPTEMBER 30, 2013
TABLE OF CONTENTS

Part I – Financial Information | 3
Item 1. Financial Statements | 3
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets | 3
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations | 4
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income | 5
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows | 6
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements | 7
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations | 26
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk | 36
Item 4. Controls and Procedures | 36
Part II – Other Information | 38
Item 1. Legal Proceedings | 38
Item 1A. Risk Factors | 38
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds | 48
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities | 48
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures | 48
Item 5. Other Information | 48
Item 6. Exhibits | 48
Signatures | 49

2

PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
BIO-RAD LABORATORIES, INC.
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
(In thousands, except share data)

| September 30, 2013 |  | December 31, 2012
ASSETS: | (Unaudited) |  |
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 291,793 |  |  | $ | 463,388 |
Short-term investments | 270,027 |  |  | 457,685 |
Accounts receivable, net | 383,471 |  |  | 398,739 |
Inventories: |  |  |
Raw materials | 105,246 |  |  | 93,009 |
Work in process | 132,111 |  |  | 124,737 |
Finished goods | 286,146 |  |  | 237,374 |
Total inventories | 523,503 |  |  | 455,120 |
Prepaid expenses | 131,357 |  |  | 92,489 |
Other current assets | 74,392 |  |  | 69,261 |
Total current assets | 1,674,543 |  |  | 1,936,682 |
Property, plant and equipment, at cost | 1,065,684 |  |  | 1,012,034 |
Less: accumulated depreciation and amortization | (640,608 | ) |  | (595,096 | )
Property, plant and equipment, net | 425,076 |  |  | 416,938 |
Goodwill, net | 513,705 |  |  | 495,418 |
Purchased intangibles, net | 276,054 |  |  | 260,939 |
Other investments | 354,733 |  |  | 293,613 |
Other assets | 36,297 |  |  | 39,913 |
Total assets | $ | 3,280,408 |  |  | $ | 3,443,503 |
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY: |  |  |
Accounts payable | $ | 131,899 |  |  | $ | 130,867 |
Accrued payroll and employee benefits | 133,218 |  |  | 135,955 |
Notes payable and current maturities of long-term debt | 1,705 |  |  | 1,750 |
Income and other taxes payable | 32,424 |  |  | 34,779 |
Accrued royalties | 19,860 |  |  | 29,718 |
Other current liabilities | 143,779 |  |  | 139,331 |
Total current liabilities | 462,885 |  |  | 472,400 |
Long-term debt, net of current maturities | 435,541 |  |  | 732,414 |
Other long-term liabilities | 257,742 |  |  | 223,149 |
Total liabilities | 1,156,168 |  |  | 1,427,963 |
Stockholders’ equity: |  |  |
Bio-Rad stockholders’ equity: |  |  |
Class A common stock, shares issued 23,578,766 and 23,332,532 at 2013 and 2012, respectively; shares outstanding 23,578,644 and 23,332,410 at 2013 and 2012, respectively | 2 |  |  | 2 |
Class B common stock, shares issued 5,087,888 and 5,149,771 at 2013 and 2012, respectively; shares outstanding 5,086,971 and 5,148,854 at 2013 and 2012, respectively | 1 |  |  | 1 |
Additional paid-in capital | 232,031 |  |  | 212,244 |
Class A treasury stock at cost, 122 shares at 2013 and 2012 | (12 | ) |  | (12 | )
Class B treasury stock at cost, 917 shares at 2013 and 2012 | (89 | ) |  | (89 | )
Retained earnings | 1,575,981 |  |  | 1,528,327 |
Accumulated other comprehensive income | 316,326 |  |  | 274,532 |
Total Bio-Rad stockholders’ equity | 2,124,240 |  |  | 2,015,005 |
Noncontrolling interests | — |  |  | 535 |
Total stockholders’ equity | 2,124,240 |  |  | 2,015,540 |
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity | $ | 3,280,408 |  |  | $ | 3,443,503 |

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
3

BIO-RAD LABORATORIES, INC.
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations
(In thousands, except per share data)
(Unaudited)

| Three Months Ended |  | Nine Months Ended
| September 30, |  | September 30,
| 2013 |  | 2012 |  | 2013 |  | 2012
Net sales | $ | 505,066 |  |  | $ | 498,697 |  |  | $ | 1,530,059 |  |  | $ | 1,495,396 |
Cost of goods sold | 220,850 |  |  | 224,927 |  |  | 674,330 |  |  | 654,784 |
Gross profit | 284,216 |  |  | 273,770 |  |  | 855,729 |  |  | 840,612 |
Selling, general and administrative expense | 202,238 |  |  | 160,134 |  |  | 583,486 |  |  | 492,913 |
Research and development expense | 52,920 |  |  | 47,795 |  |  | 155,104 |  |  | 150,637 |
Income from operations | 29,058 |  |  | 65,841 |  |  | 117,139 |  |  | 197,062 |
Interest expense | 31,611 |  |  | 11,901 |  |  | 54,252 |  |  | 37,498 |
Foreign exchange losses, net | 3,330 |  |  | 448 |  |  | 5,723 |  |  | 3,508 |
Other (income) expense, net | (667 | ) |  | (1,511 | ) |  | (10,711 | ) |  | (14,692 | )
(Loss) income before income taxes | (5,216 | ) |  | 55,003 |  |  | 67,875 |  |  | 170,748 |
Provision for income taxes | (1,883 | ) |  | (12,383 | ) |  | (20,200 | ) |  | (48,375 | )
Net (loss) income including noncontrolling interests | (7,099 | ) |  | 42,620 |  |  | 47,675 |  |  | 122,373 |
Net (income) loss attributable to noncontrolling interests | — |  |  | 13 |  |  | (21 | ) |  | (148 | )
Net (loss) income attributable to Bio-Rad | $ | (7,099 | ) |  | $ | 42,633 |  |  | $ | 47,654 |  |  | $ | 122,225 |
Basic (loss) earnings per share: |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Net (loss) income per basic share attributable to Bio-Rad | $ | (0.25 | ) |  | $ | 1.51 |  |  | $ | 1.67 |  |  | $ | 4.33 |
Weighted average common shares - basic | 28,603 |  |  | 28,312 |  |  | 28,545 |  |  | 28,255 |
Diluted (loss) earnings per share: |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Net (loss) income per diluted share attributable to Bio-Rad | $ | (0.25 | ) |  | $ | 1.49 |  |  | $ | 1.65 |  |  | $ | 4.27 |
Weighted average common shares - diluted | 28,603 |  |  | 28,645 |  |  | 28,870 |  |  | 28,609 |

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
4

BIO-RAD LABORATORIES, INC.
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)

| Three Months Ended |  | Nine Months Ended
| September 30, |  | September 30,
| 2013 |  | 2012 |  | 2013 |  | 2012
Net (loss) income including noncontrolling interests | $ | (7,099 | ) |  | $ | 42,620 |  |  | $ | 47,675 |  |  | $ | 122,373 |
Other comprehensive income: |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Foreign currency translation adjustments | 41,037 |  |  | 14,218 |  |  | 5,078 |  |  | 2,568 |
Reclassification of realized portion of cumulative translation adjustments due to liquidation, for the nine months ended September 30, 2012, net of income taxes of $0. | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 70 |
Other post-employment benefits adjustments, all net of income taxes of $0. | (246 | ) |  | 35 |  |  | 45 |  |  | 216 |
Net unrealized holding gains on available-for-sale (AFS) investments, net of income taxes of $4.8 million and $12.2 million for the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively, and $21.4 million and $30.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. | 8,216 |  |  | 21,023 |  |  | 36,688 |  |  | 52,219 |
Reclassification adjustments for net holding losses (gains) on AFS investments included in Net income including noncontrolling interests, net of income taxes of $0.2 million and $(0.4) million for the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively, and $0.1 million and $(2.9) million for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. | 294 |  |  | (719 | ) |  | 147 |  |  | (4,973 | )
Other comprehensive income, net of income taxes | 49,301 |  |  | 34,557 |  |  | 41,958 |  |  | 50,100 |
Comprehensive income | 42,202 |  |  | 77,177 |  |  | 89,633 |  |  | 172,473 |
Comprehensive loss (income) attributable to noncontrolling interests | — |  |  | 4 |  |  | (185 | ) |  | (155 | )
Comprehensive income attributable to Bio-Rad | $ | 42,202 |  |  | $ | 77,181 |  |  | $ | 89,448 |  |  | $ | 172,318 |

Reclassification adjustments are calculated using the specific identification method.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
5

BIO-RAD LABORATORIES, INC.
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(In thousands, unaudited)

| Nine Months Ended
| September 30,
| 2013 |  | 2012
Cash flows from operating activities: |  |  |
Cash received from customers | $ | 1,531,251 |  |  | $ | 1,512,991 |
Cash paid to suppliers and employees | (1,331,426 | ) |  | (1,227,911 | )
Interest paid | (50,188 | ) |  | (35,929 | )
Income tax payments | (59,720 | ) |  | (77,411 | )
Investment proceeds and miscellaneous receipts, net | 12,926 |  |  | 9,429 |
Excess tax benefits from share-based compensation | (808 | ) |  | (925 | )
Net cash provided by operating activities | 102,035 |  |  | 180,244 |
Cash flows from investing activities: |  |  |
Capital expenditures | (83,356 | ) |  | (112,366 | )
Proceeds from dispositions of property, plant and equipment | 1,252 |  |  | 231 |
Payments for acquisitions, net of cash received, and long-term investments | (68,510 | ) |  | (38,479 | )
Payments for purchases of intangible assets | (500 | ) |  | (1,724 | )
Payments for purchases of marketable securities and investments | (325,036 | ) |  | (547,529 | )
Proceeds from sales of marketable securities and investments | 277,389 |  |  | 89,371 |
Proceeds from maturities of marketable securities and investments | 234,707 |  |  | 271,150 |
Proceeds from (payments for) forward foreign exchange contracts, net | 969 |  |  | (1,418 | )
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities | 36,915 |  |  | (340,764 | )
Cash flows from financing activities: |  |  |
Net payments on line-of-credit arrangements and notes payable | (18 | ) |  | (213 | )
Payments on long-term borrowings | (300,178 | ) |  | (496 | )
Payments of contingent consideration | (25,474 | ) |  | — |
Proceeds from issuance of common stock | 9,397 |  |  | 8,958 |
Purchase of treasury stock | — |  |  | (101 | )
Excess tax benefits from share-based compensation | 808 |  |  | 925 |
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities | (315,465 | ) |  | 9,073 |
Effect of foreign exchange rate changes on cash | 4,920 |  |  | 3,673 |
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents | (171,595 | ) |  | (147,774 | )
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period | 463,388 |  |  | 574,231 |
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period | $ | 291,793 |  |  | $ | 426,457 |
Reconciliation of net income including noncontrolling interests to net cash provided by operating activities: |  |  |
Net income including noncontrolling interests | $ | 47,675 |  |  | $ | 122,373 |
Adjustments to reconcile net income including noncontrolling interests to net cash provided by operating activities excluding the effects of acquisitions: |  |  |
Depreciation and amortization | 105,181 |  |  | 94,885 |
Share-based compensation | 9,894 |  |  | 9,248 |
Forward foreign exchange contracts, net | (969 | ) |  | 1,418 |
Losses (gains) on dispositions of securities | 408 |  |  | (7,515 | )
Excess tax benefits from share-based compensation | (808 | ) |  | (925 | )
Changes in fair value of contingent consideration | (1,347 | ) |  | (15,984 | )
Decrease in accounts receivable | 14,803 |  |  | 24,880 |
Increase in inventories | (57,162 | ) |  | (18,979 | )
Increase in other current assets | (5,748 | ) |  | (4,367 | )
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable and other current liabilities | 19,272 |  |  | (5,916 | )
Decrease in income taxes payable | (30,710 | ) |  | (26,719 | )
Net increase in other long-term liabilities | 1,546 |  |  | 7,845 |
Net cash provided by operating activities | $ | 102,035 |  |  | $ | 180,244 |

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
6

BIO-RAD LABORATORIES, INC
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
1.BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND USE OF ESTIMATES
Basis of Presentation
In this report, “Bio-Rad,” “we,” “us,” "the Company" and “our” refer to Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. and its subsidiaries. The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements of Bio-Rad have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP) and reflect all adjustments which are, in the opinion of management, necessary to fairly state the results of the interim periods presented. All such adjustments are of a normal recurring nature, with the exception to the adjustments noted below. Results for the interim period are not necessarily indicative of the results for the entire year. The condensed consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2012 has been derived from the audited consolidated financial statements (and taking into account the corrections and reclassification discussed below) at that date but does not include all of the information and footnotes required by GAAP for complete financial statements. The condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the notes to the consolidated financial statements contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012.
We evaluate subsequent events and the evidence they provide about conditions existing at the date of the balance sheet as well as conditions that arose after the balance sheet date but through the date the financial statements are issued. The effects of conditions that existed at the balance sheet date are recognized in the financial statements. Events and conditions arising after the balance sheet date but before the financial statements are issued are evaluated to determine if disclosure is required to keep the financial statements from being misleading. To the extent such events and conditions exist, disclosures are made regarding the nature of events and the estimated financial effects for those events and conditions.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of the condensed consolidated financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingencies at the date of the financial statements as well as the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Bio-Rad bases its estimates on historical experience and on various other market-specific and other relevant assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results could differ materially from those estimates.
CORRECTION OF IMMATERIAL ERRORS, AND RECLASSIFICATION OF CERTAIN AMOUNTS
Inventory Costing
During the third quarter of 2013, we identified errors in the consolidated financial statements for the years 2008 through 2012 (and for all interim periods therein) and in the unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements for the three month periods ended March 31, 2013 and June 30, 2013, related to the valuation of finished goods inventory in our Life Science segment. We were expensing inventory in amounts greater than actual costs for non-sales transactions, such as expensed inventory used for demonstration purposes and product samples.
The effect of correcting these errors in 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, and for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 consolidated financial statements were increases to net income of $0.6 million, $0.8 million, $0.7 million, $0.8 million, $1.3 million, $0.3 million and $1.0 million, respectively.
7

Research and Development (R&D) Credit
During the third quarter of 2013, we revised the classification of certain amounts for all periods presented from “Provision for income taxes” to “Research and development expense” in our Consolidated Statements of Operations to conform to the current year presentation. The amounts reclassified pertain to a refundable French R&D tax credit, which after the reclassification reduces Research and development expense. The effect of the reclassifications from Provision for income taxes to Research and development expense for 2010, 2011, 2012, and for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 was $5.8 million, $8.8 million, $4.8 million, $1.2 million and $3.6 million, respectively.
Following are the amounts in thousands that should have been reported for the Consolidated Statements of Operations giving effect to the errors and the reclassification described above:

| Three Months Ended |  | Nine Months Ended |  | Year Ended December 31,
| September 30, 2012 |  | September 30, 2012 |  | 2012 | 2011 | 2010
Cost of goods sold | $ | 224,927 |  |  | $ | 654,784 |  |  | $ | 914,077 |  | $ | 894,700 |  | $ | 835,310 |
Selling, general and administrative expense | $ | 160,134 |  |  | $ | 492,913 |  |  | $ | 681,778 |  | $ | 695,984 |  | $ | 634,413 |
Research and development expense | $ | 47,795 |  |  | $ | 150,637 |  |  | $ | 209,204 |  | $ | 177,604 |  | $ | 166,486 |
Provision for income taxes | $ | 12,383 |  |  | $ | 48,375 |  |  | $ | 64,729 |  | $ | 67,034 |  | $ | 39,533 |

Presentation and Disclosure of the Statements of Comprehensive Income
During the first quarter of 2013, we identified errors in the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for 2012, 2011 and 2010, and in the unaudited interim Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for all three quarters of 2012, which affected two line items within this financial statement. Specifically, we incorrectly calculated the 1) net unrealized holding gains on available-for-sale (AFS) investments, net of tax, and 2) reclassification adjustments for net holding gains/losses on AFS investments included in net income including noncontrolling interests, net of tax.
Following are the amounts in thousands that should have been reported for the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income giving effect to the errors described above:
8

| Three Months Ended |  | Nine Months Ended |  | Year Ended December 31,
| September 30, 2012 |  | September 30, 2012 |  | 2012 | 2011 | 2010
Net unrealized holding gains on AFS investments, net of income tax; understated by $1,438, $9,946, $10,090 and $770 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, and for the years ended 2012 and 2010, respectively, and overstated by $208 for the year ended 2011. | $21,023 |  | $52,219 |  | $65,448 | $12,663 | $15,495
Income taxes on net unrealized holding gains on AFS investments; understated by $836, $5,790, $5,874 and $448 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, and for the years ended 2012 and 2010, respectively, and overstated by $121 for the year ended 2011. | $12,240 |  | $30,405 |  | $38,108 | $7,373 | $9,022
Reclassification adjustments for net holding (gains) losses on AFS investments included in Net income including noncontrolling interests, net of income tax; understated by $1,438, $9,946, $10,090 and $770 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, and for the years ended 2012 and 2010, respectively, and overstated by $208 for the year ended 2011. | $(719) |  | $(4,973) |  | $(5,045) | $104 | $(385)
Income taxes on reclassification adjustments for net holding gains/losses on AFS investments included in Net income including noncontrolling interests; understated by $836, $5,790, $5,874 and $448 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, and for the years ended 2012 and 2010, respectively, and overstated by $121 for the year ended 2011. | $(418) |  | $(2,895) |  | $(2,937) | $61 | $(224)

Management evaluated the materiality of the errors from a qualitative and quantitative perspective. Based on such evaluation, we have concluded that while the accumulation of these errors was significant to the three months ended September 30, 2013, their correction would not be material to any individual prior period, nor did they have an effect on the trend of financial results, taking into account the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 108, Considering the Effects of Prior Year Misstatements when Quantifying Misstatements in Current Year Financial Statements (SAB 108). Accordingly, we will correct these errors prospectively when the 2013 Consolidated Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income are included in future filings.
Recent Accounting Standards Updates
In February 2013, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued guidance requiring that companies present either in a single note or parenthetically on the face of the financial statements, the effect of significant amounts reclassified from each component of accumulated other comprehensive income based on its source and the income statement line items affected by the reclassification. If a component is not required to be reclassified to net income in its entirety, companies would instead cross reference to the related footnote for additional information. We adopted this guidance as of January 1, 2013 and present it in a single note.
9

2.ACQUISITIONS
In January 2013, we acquired 100% of the outstanding shares of AbD Serotec, a division of MorphoSys AG, for total consideration of $62.2 million (net of cash received of $7.3 million). This acquisition was accounted for as a business combination as AbD Serotec represented an integrated set of activities and assets that was capable of being conducted and managed for the purpose of providing a return and therefore constitutes a business in accordance with GAAP. The amount of acquisition-related costs was minimal as Bio-Rad primarily represented itself during the acquisition process. This business acquisition is included in our Life Science segment's results of operations from the acquisition date. We believe that with AbD Serotec's comprehensive catalog of antibodies, we are able to offer our customers total assay solutions that can be validated on many of our research platforms for western blotting, multiplex protein expression, ELISA and cell sorting.
During the second quarter of 2013, we finalized the determination of fair values of certain acquired intangible assets and adjusted the preliminary carrying values of goodwill and certain other assets and liabilities to include final information received, and an update to the weighted average tax rate applied to our valuation model and changes in the determination of fair values of certain assets acquired and liabilities assumed. These factors that existed as of the acquisition date resulted in an overall increase to intangible assets of $1.7 million, a reduction of goodwill of $2.1 million and an increase to net tangible assets of $0.4 million. These measurement period adjustments did not have a material impact on our previously reported condensed consolidated financial statements and, therefore, we have not retrospectively adjusted those financial statements.
The final fair values of the net assets acquired consist of definite-lived intangible assets of $44.0 million, goodwill of $14.9 million and net tangible assets of $3.3 million. A portion of the goodwill recorded may be deductible for income tax purposes.
In August 2012, we acquired from Propel Labs, Inc. a new cell sorting system, an automated, easy-to-use benchtop cell sorting flow cytometer. The new system will be sold exclusively under the Bio-Rad brand as the S3 TM Cell Sorter. This asset acquisition was accounted for as a business combination as the new cell sorting system represented an integrated set of activities and assets that was capable of being conducted and managed for the purpose of providing a return and therefore constitutes a business in accordance with GAAP. The amount of acquisition-related costs was minimal as Bio-Rad primarily represented itself during the acquisition process. This business acquisition is included in our Life Science segment's results of operations from the acquisition date.
The fair value of the consideration as of the acquisition date was $49.6 million, which included $5.0 million paid in cash at the closing date and $44.6 million in contingent consideration potentially payable to Propel Labs' shareholders. The contingent consideration was based on a probability-weighted income approach related to the achievement of certain development and sales milestones. The contingent consideration for the development milestones was valued at $19.9 million based on assumptions regarding the probability of achieving the milestones, with such amounts discounted to present value. The contingent consideration for the sales milestones was valued at $24.7 million based on a statistically significant number of simulations for each potential outcome. (See Note 3 for further discussion of the contingent consideration valuation and underlying assumptions.)
The fair values of the net assets acquired from Propel Labs, Inc. as of the acquisition date were determined to be $17.4 million of goodwill, $32.1 million of definite-lived intangible assets and $0.1 million of net tangible assets. We expect the goodwill recorded to be deductible for income tax purposes. The acquired cell sorting system fits well into Bio-Rad's existing Life Science segment product offerings and may offer researchers greater access to this technology.
In July 2012, we acquired all of the outstanding shares of DiaMed Benelux for 4.6 million Euros (approximately $5.6 million) in cash. This acquisition was accounted for as a business combination as DiaMed Benelux represented an integrated set of activities and assets that was capable of being conducted and managed for the purpose of providing a return and therefore constitutes a business in accordance with GAAP. The amount of
10

acquisition-related costs was minimal as Bio-Rad primarily represented itself during the acquisition process. This business acquisition is included in our Clinical Diagnostics segment's results of operations from the acquisition date.
We acquired net tangible liabilities with a fair value of $2.3 million and the fair values of the assets acquired as of the acquisition date were determined to be $3.0 million of goodwill and $4.9 million of definite-lived intangible assets. The goodwill recorded will not be deductible for income tax purposes. DiaMed Benelux became the exclusive distributor of certain Bio-Rad immunohematology products in the Benelux market as a result of the 2007 acquisition of DiaMed Holding AG. This distributor acquisition is consistent with our stated objective to control the distribution of our own products and services.
In January 2012, we purchased, for cash, certain assets from a raw material supplier for approximately $12.5 million. This asset acquisition was accounted for as a business combination as the certain assets acquired represented an integrated set of activities and assets that was capable of being conducted and managed for the purpose of providing a return and therefore constitutes a business in accordance with GAAP. The amount of acquisition-related costs was minimal as Bio-Rad primarily represented itself during the acquisition process. This business acquisition is included in the Clinical Diagnostics segment's results of operations from the acquisition date. The fair value of the assets acquired was determined to be $6.3 million of net tangible assets, $5.1 million of intangible assets and $1.1 million of goodwill. We expect the goodwill recorded to be deductible for income tax purposes. In addition, we paid $2.0 million for employment agreements as an incentive to certain employees of the acquired business to remain with Bio-Rad. Such amount will be expensed over two years from the acquisition date and was recorded in Prepaid expenses, taxes and other current assets, and Other assets in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet. We believe this acquisition allows us to secure the supply of critical raw materials and lower our overall costs in the Clinical Diagnostics segment.
We do not consider any of these business combinations in 2013 and 2012, individually, or when aggregated, to be material and therefore have not disclosed the pro forma results of operations as required for material business combinations.
3.FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
We determine the fair value of an asset or liability based on the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The identification of market participant assumptions provides a basis for determining what inputs are to be used for pricing each asset or liability. A fair value hierarchy has been established which gives precedence to fair value measurements calculated using observable inputs over those using unobservable inputs. This hierarchy prioritizes the inputs into three broad levels as follows:

• | Level 1: Quoted prices in active markets for identical instruments

• | Level 2: Other significant observable inputs (including quoted prices in active markets for similar instruments)

• | Level 3: Significant unobservable inputs (including assumptions in determining the fair value of certain investments)

Financial assets and liabilities carried at fair value and measured on a recurring basis as of September 30, 2013 are classified in the hierarchy as follows (in millions):
11

| Level 1 |  | Level 2 |  | Level 3 |  | Total
Financial Assets Carried at Fair Value: |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Cash equivalents (a): |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Commercial paper | $ | — |  |  | $ | 14.0 |  |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | 14.0 |
Foreign time deposits | 11.4 |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 11.4 |
Money market funds | 0.2 |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 0.2 |
Total cash equivalents | 11.6 |  |  | 14.0 |  |  | — |  |  | 25.6 |
Available-for-sale investments (b): |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Corporate debt securities | — |  |  | 120.3 |  |  | — |  |  | 120.3 |
Foreign brokered certificates of deposit | — |  |  | 8.9 |  |  | — |  |  | 8.9 |
U.S. government sponsored agencies | — |  |  | 42.3 |  |  | — |  |  | 42.3 |
Foreign government obligations | — |  |  | 6.9 |  |  | — |  |  | 6.9 |
Municipal obligations | — |  |  | 10.6 |  |  | — |  |  | 10.6 |
Marketable equity securities | 303.5 |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 303.5 |
Asset-backed securities | — |  |  | 51.6 |  |  | — |  |  | 51.6 |
Total available-for-sale investments | 303.5 |  |  | 240.6 |  |  | — |  |  | 544.1 |
Forward foreign exchange contracts (c) | — |  |  | 0.9 |  |  | — |  |  | 0.9 |
Total financial assets carried at fair value | $ | 315.1 |  |  | $ | 255.5 |  |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | 570.6 |
Financial Liabilities Carried at Fair Value: |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Forward foreign exchange contracts (d) | $ | — |  |  | $ | 1.1 |  |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | 1.1 |
Contingent consideration (e) | — |  |  | — |  |  | 25.2 |  |  | 25.2 |
Total financial liabilities carried at fair value | $ | — |  |  | $ | 1.1 |  |  | $ | 25.2 |  |  | $ | 26.3 |

Financial assets and liabilities carried at fair value and measured on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2012 are classified in the hierarchy as follows (in millions):
12

| Level 1 |  | Level 2 |  | Level 3 |  | Total
Financial Assets Carried at Fair Value: |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Cash equivalents (a): |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Commercial paper | $ | — |  |  | $ | 52.8 |  |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | 52.8 |
Foreign time deposits | 10.1 |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 10.1 |
U.S. government sponsored agencies | — |  |  | 1.3 |  |  | — |  |  | 1.3 |
Money market funds | 5.5 |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 5.5 |
Total cash equivalents | 15.6 |  |  | 54.1 |  |  | — |  |  | 69.7 |
Available-for-sale investments (b): |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Corporate debt securities | — |  |  | 240.6 |  |  | — |  |  | 240.6 |
Foreign brokered certificates of deposit | — |  |  | 0.4 |  |  | — |  |  | 0.4 |
U.S. government sponsored agencies | — |  |  | 92.7 |  |  | — |  |  | 92.7 |
Foreign government obligations | — |  |  | 5.6 |  |  | — |  |  | 5.6 |
Municipal obligations | — |  |  | 12.1 |  |  | — |  |  | 12.1 |
Marketable equity securities | 242.1 |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 242.1 |
Asset-backed securities | — |  |  | 82.2 |  |  | — |  |  | 82.2 |
Total available-for-sale investments | 242.1 |  |  | 433.6 |  |  | — |  |  | 675.7 |
Forward foreign exchange contracts (c) | — |  |  | 1.1 |  |  | — |  |  | 1.1 |
Total financial assets carried at fair value | $ | 257.7 |  |  | $ | 488.8 |  |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | 746.5 |
Financial Liabilities Carried at Fair Value: |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Forward foreign exchange contracts (d) | $ | — |  |  | $ | 0.8 |  |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | 0.8 |
Contingent consideration (e) | — |  |  | — |  |  | 52.6 |  |  | 52.6 |
Total financial liabilities carried at fair value | $ | — |  |  | $ | 0.8 |  |  | $ | 52.6 |  |  | $ | 53.4 |

(a) | Cash equivalents are included in Cash and cash equivalents in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.

(b) | Available-for-sale investments are included in the following accounts in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets (in millions):

| September 30, 2013 |  | December 31, 2012
Short-term investments | $ | 270.0 |  |  | $ | 457.7 |
Other investments | 274.1 |  |  | 218.0 |
Total | $ | 544.1 |  |  | $ | 675.7 |

(c) | Forward foreign exchange contracts in an asset position are included in Prepaid expenses, taxes and other current assets in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.

(d) | Forward foreign exchange contracts in a liability position are included in Other current liabilities in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.

(e) | Contingent consideration liability is included in the following accounts in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets (in millions):

13

| September 30, 2013 |  | December 31, 2012
Other current liabilities | $ | 6.9 |  |  | $ | 27.3 |
Other long-term liabilities | 18.3 |  |  | 25.3 |
Total | $ | 25.2 |  |  | $ | 52.6 |

During the fourth quarter of 2011 we recognized a contingent consideration liability upon our acquisition of QuantaLife related to potential future payments due upon the achievement of certain sales and development milestones. The contingent consideration was initially recognized at its estimated fair value of $24.1 million, based on a probability-weighted income approach. As of the acquisition date of October 4, 2011, total contingent consideration could have originally reached a maximum of $48 million upon the achievement of all sales milestones and a development milestone. However, we do not expect that the sales milestones will be met and therefore the remaining contingent consideration of $0.7 million was credited to Selling, general and administrative expense during the third quarter of 2013. The development milestone was met as of December 31, 2012, resulting in a payment of $6.0 million in January 2013.
During the third quarter of 2012, we recognized a contingent consideration liability upon our acquisition of a new cell sorting system from Propel Labs, Inc. The contingent consideration was revalued to its estimated fair value of $25.2 million and $44.6 million as of September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively. The fair value of the contingent consideration was based on a probability-weighted income approach related to the achievement of certain development and sales milestones. The development milestones have been achieved and payments totaling $20 million were made in 2013. This form of payment guarantees that the seller transitions the manufacturing of the product to Bio-Rad. Based on the most recent valuation, the sales milestones could potentially range from $0 to a maximum of 60.0%, 51.32% and 50.38% of annual cell sorting system purchase orders, with payment to occur upon the anniversary of the completion of a certain number of cell sorting systems for three consecutive years, respectively. These maximum payout ratios begin at annual cell sorting system purchase orders in excess of $20 million, $30 million and $45 million for the three consecutive years, respectively.
The following table provides a reconciliation of the Level 3 contingent consideration liabilities measured at estimated fair value based on original valuations and updated quarterly for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 (in millions):

January 1 | $ | 52.6 |
Payment of development milestone - QuantaLife | (6.0 | )
Payment of development milestone - Cell sorting system | (20.0 | )
Decrease in estimated fair value of contingent consideration included in Selling, general and administrative expense - QuantaLife | (2.0 | )
Increase in estimated fair value of contingent consideration included in Selling, general and administrative expense - Cell sorting system | 0.6 |
September 30 | $ | 25.2 |

The following table provides quantitative information about Level 3 inputs for fair value measurement of our contingent consideration liability as of September 30, 2013. Significant increases or decreases in these inputs in isolation could result in a significantly lower or higher fair value measurement.
14

|  |  | Range
| Valuation Technique | Unobservable Input | From | To
Cell sorting system | Probability-weighted income approach | Sales milestones: |  |
|  | Credit adjusted discount rates | 1.1% | 2.0%
|  | Projected volatility of growth rate | 15.0% | N/A
|  | Market price of risk | 1.3% | N/A

To estimate the fair value of Level 2 debt securities as of September 30, 2013, our primary pricing provider simplified its process during the first quarter of 2013 by eliminating certain pricing sources and established S&P Capital IQ as the primary pricing source. The new pricing process allows us to select a hierarchy of pricing sources for securities held. The chosen pricing hierarchy for our Level 2 securities, other than certificates of deposit and commercial paper, is S&P Capital IQ as the primary pricing source and then our custodian as the secondary pricing source. If S&P Capital IQ does not price a Level 2 security that we hold, then the pricing provider will utilize our custodian supplied pricing.
For commercial paper as of September 30, 2013, pricing is determined by a straight-line calculation, starting with the purchase price on the date of purchase and increasing to par at maturity. Interest bearing certificates of deposit and commercial paper are priced at par.
In addition to the above, our primary pricing provider performed daily reasonableness testing of the S&P Capital IQ prices to custodian reported prices. Prices outside a tolerable variance of approximately 1% are investigated and resolved.
To estimate the fair value of Level 2 debt securities as of December 31, 2012, our primary pricing service relied on inputs from multiple industry-recognized pricing sources to determine the price for each investment. In addition, our pricing service performed reasonableness testing of their prices on a daily basis by comparing them to the prices reported by our custodians as well as prior day prices. If the price difference fell outside of predetermined tolerable levels, they investigated the cause and resolved the pricing issue. Based on a review of the results of this analysis, we utilized our primary pricing service for all Level 2 debt securities as none of these securities tested outside of the tolerable levels.
As of December 31, 2012, our primary pricing service inputs for Level 2 U.S. government sponsored agencies, municipal obligations, corporate and foreign government bonds, asset-backed securities and related cash equivalents consisted of market prices from a variety of industry standard data providers, security master files from large financial institutions and other third-party sources. These multiple market prices were used by our primary pricing service as inputs into a distribution-curve based algorithm to determine the daily market value.
As of December 31, 2012, our primary pricing service inputs for Level 2 corporate debt securities (commercial paper), bank deposits and related cash equivalents consisted of dynamic and static security characteristics information obtained from several independent sources of security data. The dynamic inputs such as credit rating, factor and variable-rate, were updated daily. The static characteristics included inputs such as day count and first coupon upon initial security creation. These securities were typically priced utilizing mathematical calculations reliant on these observable inputs. Other available-for-sale foreign government obligations were based on indicative bids from market participants.
Available-for-sale investments consist of the following (in millions):
15

| September 30, 2013
| Amortized Cost |  | Unrealized Gains |  | Unrealized Losses |  | Estimated Fair Value
Short-term investments: |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Corporate debt securities | $ | 120.4 |  |  | $ | 0.3 |  |  | $ | (0.4 | ) |  | $ | 120.3 |
Foreign brokered certificates of deposit | 8.9 |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 8.9 |
Municipal obligations | 10.7 |  |  | — |  |  | (0.1 | ) |  | 10.6 |
Asset-backed securities | 51.5 |  |  | — |  |  | (0.2 | ) |  | 51.3 |
U.S. government sponsored agencies | 42.2 |  |  | 0.1 |  |  | — |  |  | 42.3 |
Foreign government obligations | 6.9 |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 6.9 |
Marketable equity securities | 25.1 |  |  | 4.7 |  |  | (0.1 | ) |  | 29.7 |
| 265.7 |  |  | 5.1 |  |  | (0.8 | ) |  | 270.0 |
Long-term investments: |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Marketable equity securities | 54.5 |  |  | 219.3 |  |  | — |  |  | 273.8 |
Asset-backed securities | 0.4 |  |  | — |  |  | (0.1 | ) |  | 0.3 |
| 54.9 |  |  | 219.3 |  |  | (0.1 | ) |  | 274.1 |
Total | $ | 320.6 |  |  | $ | 224.4 |  |  | $ | (0.9 | ) |  | $ | 544.1 |

| December 31, 2012
| Amortized Cost |  | Unrealized Gains |  | Unrealized Losses |  | Estimated Fair Value
Short-term investments: |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Corporate debt securities | $ | 239.3 |  |  | $ | 1.4 |  |  | $ | (0.1 | ) |  | $ | 240.6 |
Foreign brokered certificates of deposit | 0.4 |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 0.4 |
Municipal obligations | 12.0 |  |  | 0.1 |  |  | — |  |  | 12.1 |
Asset-backed securities | 81.6 |  |  | 0.4 |  |  | (0.1 | ) |  | 81.9 |
U.S. government sponsored agencies | 92.5 |  |  | 0.3 |  |  | (0.1 | ) |  | 92.7 |
Foreign government obligations | 5.4 |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 5.4 |
Marketable equity securities | 24.1 |  |  | 0.7 |  |  | (0.2 | ) |  | 24.6 |
| 455.3 |  |  | 2.9 |  |  | (0.5 | ) |  | 457.7 |
Long-term investments: |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Marketable equity securities | 54.5 |  |  | 163.0 |  |  | — |  |  | 217.5 |
Asset-backed securities | 0.4 |  |  | — |  |  | (0.1 | ) |  | 0.3 |
Foreign government obligations | 0.2 |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 0.2 |
| 55.1 |  |  | 163.0 |  |  | (0.1 | ) |  | 218.0 |
Total | $ | 510.4 |  |  | $ | 165.9 |  |  | $ | (0.6 | ) |  | $ | 675.7 |

The following is a summary of investments with gross unrealized losses and the associated fair value (in millions):
16

| September 30, 2013 |  | December 31, 2012
Fair value of investments in a loss position 12 months or more | $ | 2.1 |  |  | $ | 0.3 |
Fair value of investments in a loss position less than 12 months | $ | 92.3 |  |  | $ | 99.0 |
Gross unrealized losses for investments in a loss position 12 months or more | $ | 0.1 |  |  | $ | 0.1 |
Gross unrealized losses for investments in a loss position less than 12 months | $ | 0.8 |  |  | $ | 0.5 |

The unrealized losses on these securities are due to a number of factors, including changes in interest rates, changes in economic conditions and changes in market outlook for various industries, among others. Because Bio-Rad has the ability and intent to hold these investments with unrealized losses until a recovery of fair value, or for a reasonable period of time sufficient for a forecasted recovery of fair value, which may be maturity, we do not consider these investments to be other-than-temporarily impaired at September 30, 2013 or December 31, 2012.
Forward foreign exchange contracts: As part of distributing our products, we regularly enter into intercompany transactions. We enter into forward foreign exchange contracts to manage foreign exchange risk of future movements in foreign exchange rates that affect foreign currency denominated intercompany receivables and payables. We do not use derivative financial instruments for speculative or trading purposes. We do not seek hedge accounting treatment for these contracts. As a result, these contracts, generally with maturity dates of 90 days or less and related primarily to currencies of industrial countries, are recorded at their fair value at each balance sheet date. The notional principal amounts provide one measure of the transaction volume outstanding as of September 30, 2013 and do not represent the amount of Bio-Rad's exposure to loss. The estimated fair value of these contracts was derived using the spot rates from Reuters on the last business day of the quarter and the points provided by counterparties. The resulting gains or losses offset exchange gains or losses on the related receivables and payables, both of which are included in Foreign exchange losses, net in the unaudited interim Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations.
The following is a summary of our forward foreign exchange contracts (in millions):

| September 30,
| 2013
Contracts maturing in October through December 2013 to sell foreign currency: |
Notional value | $ | 75.1 |
Unrealized loss | $ | (0.4 | )
Contracts maturing in October through December 2013 to purchase foreign currency: |
Notional value | $ | 401.4 |
Unrealized gain | $ | 0.2 |

The following is a summary of the amortized cost and estimated fair value of our debt securities at September 30, 2013 by contractual maturity date (in millions):

| Amortized Cost |  | Estimated Fair Value
Mature in less than one year | $ | 86.1 |  |  | $ | 86.2 |
Mature in one to five years | 113.0 |  |  | 113.0 |
Mature in more than five years | 41.9 |  |  | 41.4 |
Total | $ | 241.0 |  |  | $ | 240.6 |

17

The estimated fair value of financial instruments in the table below has been determined using quoted prices in active markets for identical instruments or other significant observable inputs, including quoted prices in active markets for similar instruments. Estimates are not necessarily indicative of the amounts that could be realized in a current market exchange as considerable judgment is required in interpreting market data used to develop estimates of fair value. The use of different market assumptions or estimation techniques could have a material effect on the estimated fair value. Other investments include some financial instruments that have fair values based on market quotations. Long-term debt, excluding leases and current maturities, has an estimated fair value based on quoted market prices for the same or similar issues.
The estimated fair value of our financial instruments and the level of the fair value hierarchy within which the fair value measurement is categorized are as follows (in millions):

| September 30, 2013 |  | December 31, 2012
| Carrying Amount |  | Estimated Fair Value |  | Fair Value Hierarchy Level |  | Carrying Amount |  | Estimated Fair Value |  | Fair Value Hierarchy Level
Other investments | $ | 354.7 |  |  | $ | 635.0 |  |  | 1 |  | $ | 293.6 |  |  | $ | 497.8 |  |  | 1
Total long-term debt, excluding leases and current maturities | $ | 423.2 |  |  | $ | 440.0 |  |  | 2 |  | $ | 720.0 |  |  | $ | 778.4 |  |  | 2

We own shares of ordinary voting stock of Sartorius AG (Sartorius), of Goettingen, Germany, a process technology supplier to the biotechnology, pharmaceutical, chemical and food and beverage industries. We own over 35% of the outstanding voting shares (excluding treasury shares) of Sartorius as of September 30, 2013. The Sartorius family trust and Sartorius family members hold a controlling interest of the outstanding voting shares. We do not have any representative or designee on Sartorius’ Board of Directors, nor do we have the ability to exercise significant influence over the operating and financial policies of Sartorius. In addition, the ordinary voting stock of Sartorius is thinly traded. Therefore, we account for this investment using the cost method. The carrying value of this investment is included in Other investments in our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.
4.GOODWILL AND OTHER PURCHASED INTANGIBLE ASSETS
Changes to goodwill by segment were as follows (in millions):

| Life Science |  | Clinical Diagnostics |  | Total
Balances as of January 1, 2013: |  |  |  |  |
Goodwill | $ | 193.6 |  |  | $ | 330.0 |  |  | $ | 523.6 |
Accumulated impairment losses | (27.2 | ) |  | (1.0 | ) |  | (28.2 | )
Goodwill, net | 166.4 |  |  | 329.0 |  |  | 495.4 |
Acquisitions | 14.9 |  |  | — |  |  | 14.9 |
Currency fluctuations | 0.2 |  |  | 3.2 |  |  | 3.4 |
Balances as of September 30, 2013: |  |  |  |  |
Goodwill | 208.7 |  |  | 333.2 |  |  | 541.9 |
Accumulated impairment losses | (27.2 | ) |  | (1.0 | ) |  | (28.2 | )
Goodwill, net | $ | 181.5 |  |  | $ | 332.2 |  |  | $ | 513.7 |

18

In conjunction with the acquisition of 100% of the outstanding shares of AbD Serotec (see Note 2), we have recorded $14.9 million of goodwill and $44.0 million of definite-lived intangible assets: $33.0 million of developed product technology, $8.8 million of licenses, $1.3 million of customer relationships/lists, $0.4 million of tradenames and $0.5 million of other purchased intangibles.
Other than goodwill, we have no intangible assets with indefinite lives. Information regarding our identifiable purchased intangible assets with definite lives is as follows (in millions):

| September 30, 2013
| Average Remaining Life (years) |  | Purchase Price |  | Accumulated Amortization |  | Net Carrying Amount
Customer relationships/lists | 1-11 |  | $ | 105.2 |  |  | $ | (44.6 | ) |  | $ | 60.6 |
Know how | 2-12 |  | 193.3 |  |  | (83.2 | ) |  | 110.1 |
Developed product technology | 1-13 |  | 108.4 |  |  | (33.3 | ) |  | 75.1 |
Licenses | 1-12 |  | 44.7 |  |  | (21.4 | ) |  | 23.3 |
Tradenames | 1-10 |  | 7.6 |  |  | (5.0 | ) |  | 2.6 |
Covenants not to compete | 7-9 |  | 4.9 |  |  | (0.6 | ) |  | 4.3 |
Other | — |  | 0.6 |  |  | (0.5 | ) |  | 0.1 |
|  |  | $ | 464.7 |  |  | $ | (188.6 | ) |  | $ | 276.1 |

| December 31, 2012
| Average Remaining Life (years) |  | Purchase Price |  | Accumulated Amortization |  | Net Carrying Amount
Customer relationships/lists | 1-12 |  | $ | 102.8 |  |  | $ | (38.4 | ) |  | $ | 64.4 |
Know how | 1-13 |  | 189.3 |  |  | (67.1 | ) |  | 122.2 |
Developed product technology | 1-10 |  | 74.6 |  |  | (25.1 | ) |  | 49.5 |
Licenses | 1-8 |  | 35.6 |  |  | (18.7 | ) |  | 16.9 |
Tradenames | 1-10 |  | 7.4 |  |  | (4.3 | ) |  | 3.1 |
Covenants not to compete | 1-10 |  | 4.9 |  |  | (0.2 | ) |  | 4.7 |
Other | 1 |  | 0.1 |  |  | — |  |  | 0.1 |
|  |  | $ | 414.7 |  |  | $ | (153.8 | ) |  | $ | 260.9 |

Amortization expense related to purchased intangible assets is as follows (in millions):

| Three Months Ended |  | Nine Months Ended
| September 30, |  | September 30,
| 2013 |  | 2012 |  | 2013 |  | 2012
Amortization expense | $ | 11.3 |  |  | $ | 10.7 |  |  | $ | 33.5 |  |  | $ | 32.2 |

19

5.PRODUCT WARRANTY LIABILITY
We warrant certain equipment against defects in design, materials and workmanship, generally for a period of one year. Upon delivery of that equipment, we establish, as part of Cost of goods sold, a provision for the expected costs of such warranty based on historical experience, specific warranty terms and customer feedback. A review is performed on a quarterly basis to assess the adequacy of our warranty accrual.
Components of the warranty accrual, included in Other current liabilities and Other long-term liabilities in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets, were as follows (in millions):

January 1, 2013 | $ | 16.4 |
Provision for warranty | 10.6 |
Actual warranty costs | (12.1 | )
September 30, 2013 | $ | 14.9 |

6. LONG-TERM DEBT
The principal components of long-term debt are as follows (in millions):

| September 30, 2013 |  | December 31, 2012
8.0% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2016 | $ | — |  |  | $ | 296.9 |
4.875% Senior Notes due 2020 | 423.2 |  |  | 423.0 |
Capital leases and other debt | 12.5 |  |  | 12.7 |
| 435.7 |  |  | 732.6 |
Less current maturities | (0.2 | ) |  | (0.2 | )
Long-term debt | $ | 435.5 |  |  | $ | 732.4 |

Senior Subordinated Notes due 2016
In May 2009, Bio-Rad sold $300.0 million principal amount of Senior Subordinated Notes due 2016 (8.0% Notes). The sale yielded net cash proceeds of $294.8 million. In September 2013, we redeemed all of the 8.0% Notes for $312.0 million, including a call premium of $12.0 million, and expensed the remaining original issuance bond discount of $2.5 million and unamortized bond issuance costs of $1.1 million. This total loss on extinguishment is $15.6 million and is included in Interest expense in our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations.
Amended and Restated Credit Agreement (Credit Agreement)
In June 2010, Bio-Rad entered into a $200.0 million Credit Agreement. Borrowings under the Credit Agreement are on a revolving basis and can be used for acquisitions, for working capital and for other general corporate purposes. We had no outstanding borrowings under the Credit Agreement as of September 30, 2013 or December 31, 2012. The Credit Agreement expires on June 21, 2014.
20

The Credit Agreement is secured by substantially all of our personal property assets, the assets of our domestic subsidiaries and 65% of the capital stock of certain of our foreign subsidiaries. It is guaranteed by all of our existing and future material domestic subsidiaries. The Credit Agreement requires Bio-Rad to comply with certain financial ratios and covenants, among other things. These ratios and covenants include a leverage ratio test and an interest coverage test, as well as restrictions on our ability to declare or pay dividends, incur debt, guarantee debt, enter into transactions with affiliates, merge or consolidate, sell assets, make investments, create liens and prepay subordinated debt. We were in compliance with all of these ratios and covenants as of September 30, 2013.
7.NONCONTROLLING INTERESTS
Activity in noncontrolling interests is as follows (in millions):

January 1, 2013 | $ | 0.5 |
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests | — |
Purchase of noncontrolling interests | (0.6 | )
Currency fluctuations | 0.1 |
September 30, 2013 | $ | — |

In February 2013, we acquired the remaining outstanding shares of Distribuidora de Analitica para Medicina Iberica S.A. (DiaMed Spain) from the remaining noncontrolling shareholder for approximately 0.6 million Euros or $0.9 million in cash. This acquisition was accounted for as an equity transaction, which reduced Bio-Rad's noncontrolling interests and additional paid-in capital by $0.6 million and $0.3 million, respectively.
8. ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
Changes to Accumulated other comprehensive income components are shown in the following table:

| Foreign currency translation adjustments | Other post-employment benefits adjustments | Net unrealized holding gains on available-for-sale investments | Bio-Rad Accumulated other comprehensive income | Non-controlling interests | Total Accumulated other comprehensive income
Balance at January 1, 2013 | $ | 172.9 |  | $ | (8.1 | ) | $ | 109.7 |  | $ | 274.5 |  | $ | (0.2 | ) | $ | 274.3 |
Other comprehensive income, net of income taxes before reclassifications | 5.1 |  | — |  | 36.7 |  | 41.8 |  | — |  | 41.8 |
Amounts reclassified from Accumulated other comprehensive income | (0.2 | ) | — |  | 0.2 |  | — |  | 0.2 |  | 0.2 |
Net Other comprehensive income, net of income taxes | 4.9 |  | — |  | 36.9 |  | 41.8 |  | 0.2 |  | 42.0 |
Balance at September 30, 2013 | $ | 177.8 |  | $ | (8.1 | ) | $ | 146.6 |  | $ | 316.3 |  | $ | — |  | $ | 316.3 |

21

Reclassifications from Accumulated other comprehensive income for the period ended September 30, 2013 are summarized in the following table:

Details about Accumulated other comprehensive income components |  | Amount reclassified from Accumulated other comprehensive income |  | Affected line item in the statement where net income is presented
Net holding losses on available-for-sale investments |  | $ | 0.2 |  |  | Other (income) expense, net
|  | — |  |  | Income tax expense |  |
|  | $ | 0.2 |  |  | Net of income taxes |  |

9. (LOSS) EARNINGS PER SHARE
Basic (loss) earnings per share is computed by dividing net (loss) income attributable to Bio-Rad by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for that period. Diluted (loss) earnings per share takes into account the effect of dilutive instruments, such as stock options and restricted stock, and uses the average share price for the period in determining the number of potential common shares that are to be added to the weighted average number of shares outstanding. Potential common shares are excluded from the diluted (loss) earnings per share calculation if the effect of including such securities would be anti-dilutive. For the three months ended September 30, 2013, net loss per basic share was the same as net loss per diluted share because all potentially dilutive shares were anti-dilutive due to the net loss for the period.
The weighted average number of common shares outstanding used to calculate basic and diluted (loss) earnings per share, and the anti-dilutive shares that are excluded from the diluted earnings per share calculation are as follows (in thousands):

| Three Months Ended |  | Nine Months Ended
| September 30, |  | September 30,
| 2013 |  | 2012 |  | 2013 |  | 2012
Basic weighted average shares outstanding | 28,603 |  |  | 28,312 |  |  | 28,545 |  |  | 28,255 |
Effect of potentially dilutive stock options and restricted stock awards | — |  |  | 333 |  |  | 325 |  |  | 354 |
Diluted weighted average common shares | 28,603 |  |  | 28,645 |  |  | 28,870 |  |  | 28,609 |
Anti-dilutive shares | 416 |  |  | 94 |  |  | 95 |  |  | 106 |

22

10. OTHER INCOME AND EXPENSE
Other (income) expense, net includes the following components (in millions):

| Three Months Ended |  | Nine Months Ended
| September 30, |  | September 30,
| 2013 |  | 2012 |  | 2013 |  | 2012
Interest and investment income | $ | (1.1 | ) |  | $ | (1.0 | ) |  | $ | (10.2 | ) |  | $ | (7.9 | )
Net realized losses (gains) on investments | 0.5 |  |  | (1.1 | ) |  | 0.2 |  |  | (8.5 | )
Miscellaneous other (income) expense items, net | (0.1 | ) |  | 0.6 |  |  | (0.7 | ) |  | 1.7 |
Other (income) expense, net | $ | (0.7 | ) |  | $ | (1.5 | ) |  | $ | (10.7 | ) |  | $ | (14.7 | )

11. INCOME TAXES
Our effective income tax rate was (36)% and 23% for the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The effective tax rate for the third quarter of 2013 was higher than expected due to discrete items related primarily to tax liabilities for unrecognized tax benefits and audit settlements in our foreign jurisdictions. The effective tax rate for the third quarter of 2013 was negative because of the pretax loss incurred in the third quarter of 2013. The effective tax rate for the third quarter of 2012 was lower than the U.S. statutory rate primarily due to tax benefits from differences between U.S. and foreign statutory tax rates, and research and development tax credits.
Our effective income tax rate was 30% and 28% for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The effective tax rate for the first nine months of 2013 reflected a significant tax benefit related to the 2012 U.S. federal research credit, which was retroactively reinstated on January 2, 2013, as well as discrete items related primarily to our foreign operations. The effective income tax rates for the first nine months of 2013 and 2012 were lower than the U.S. statutory rate primarily due to tax benefits from differences between U.S. and foreign statutory tax rates, and research and development tax credits.
Our foreign taxes for all periods resulted primarily from taxable income earned in France and Switzerland. Switzerland's statutory tax rate is significantly lower than the U.S. statutory tax rate of 35%. Also, our effective tax rates for all periods were reduced by French tax incentives related to our research and development activities.
We file federal, state and foreign income tax returns in many jurisdictions in the United States and abroad. Our income tax returns are audited by federal, state and foreign tax authorities. We are currently under examination by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) for the 2009 and 2010 tax years and by various state and foreign jurisdictions. There are differing interpretations of tax laws and regulations, and as a result, significant disputes may arise with these tax authorities involving issues of the timing and amount of deductions and allocations of income among various tax jurisdictions. We periodically evaluate our exposures associated with our tax filing positions.
As of September 30, 2013, based on the expected outcome of certain examinations or as a result of the expiration of statute of limitations for certain jurisdictions, we believe that within the next 12 months it is reasonably possible that our previously unrecognized tax benefits could decrease by approximately $1.4 million. Substantially all such amounts will impact our effective income tax rate.
We record liabilities for unrecognized tax benefits related to uncertain tax positions. We do not believe any currently pending uncertain tax positions will have a material adverse effect on our condensed consolidated financial statements, although an adverse resolution of one or more of these uncertain tax positions in any period may have a material impact on the results of operations for that period.
23

In September of 2013, the U.S. Department of the Treasury and the Internal Revenue Service released final regulations regarding the deductibility and capitalization of expenditures related to tangible property. Compliance with these final regulations will be required with companies’ federal income tax returns for tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2014, although early adoption is available. We are currently assessing these rules and the impact to the financial statements, if any. We do not anticipate that these regulations will have a material impact on our consolidated results of operations, cash flows or financial position.
12. SEGMENT INFORMATION
Information regarding industry segments for the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 is as follows (in millions):

|  | Life Science |  | Clinical Diagnostics |  | Other Operations
Segment net sales | 2013 | $ | 162.9 |  |  | $ | 338.8 |  |  | $ | 3.4 |
| 2012 | $ | 167.0 |  |  | $ | 328.4 |  |  | $ | 3.3 |
Segment (loss) profit | 2013 | $ | (8.5 | ) |  | $ | 43.0 |  |  | $ | — |
| 2012 | $ | 6.8 |  |  | $ | 48.2 |  |  | $ | — |

Information regarding industry segments for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 is as follows (in millions):

|  | Life Science |  | Clinical Diagnostics |  | Other Operations
Segment net sales | 2013 | $ | 489.5 |  |  | $ | 1,030.2 |  |  | $ | 10.4 |
| 2012 | $ | 484.2 |  |  | $ | 999.6 |  |  | $ | 11.6 |
Segment (loss) profit | 2013 | $ | (28.9 | ) |  | $ | 130.6 |  |  | $ | 0.3 |
| 2012 | $ | 9.4 |  |  | $ | 151.8 |  |  | $ | 1.8 |

Segment results are presented in the same manner as we present our operations internally to make operating decisions and assess performance. Net corporate operating, interest and other expense for segment results consists of receipts and expenditures that are not the primary responsibility of segment operating management and therefore are not allocated to the segments for performance assessment by our chief operating decision maker. For both the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013, this includes the accrual of $20.0 million in connection with our initial efforts to resolve the SEC and DOJ investigations relating to the FCPA that was recorded in the third quarter of 2013 (see Note 13) and the $15.6 million loss on extinguishment of our 8.0% Senior Subordinated Notes (see Note 6). Interest expense, excluding the loss on extinguishment of the bonds, is charged to segments based on the carrying amount of inventory and receivables employed by that segment. The following reconciles total segment profit to consolidated (loss) income before taxes (in millions):
24

| Three Months Ended |  | Nine Months Ended
| September 30, |  | September 30,
| 2013 |  | 2012 |  | 2013 |  | 2012
Total segment profit | $ | 34.5 |  |  | $ | 55.0 |  |  | $ | 102.0 |  |  | $ | 163.0 |
Foreign exchange losses, net | (3.3 | ) |  | (0.4 | ) |  | (5.7 | ) |  | (3.5 | )
Net corporate operating, interest and other expense not allocated to segments | (37.1 | ) |  | (1.1 | ) |  | (39.1 | ) |  | (3.5 | )
Other income (expense), net | 0.7 |  |  | 1.5 |  |  | 10.7 |  |  | 14.7 |
Consolidated (loss) income before income taxes | $ | (5.2 | ) |  | $ | 55.0 |  |  | $ | 67.9 |  |  | $ | 170.7 |

13. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
Based on an internal investigation, we identified conduct in certain of our overseas operations that may have violated the anti-bribery provisions of the United States Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) and is likely to have violated the FCPA's books and records and internal controls provisions and our own internal policies. In May 2010, we voluntarily disclosed these matters to the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) and the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), each of which commenced an investigation. The Audit Committee of our Board of Directors (Audit Committee) assumed direct responsibility for reviewing these matters and hired experienced independent counsel to conduct an investigation and provide legal advice. We provided additional information to the DOJ and the SEC as the Audit Committee's investigation progressed. We continue to cooperate with the DOJ and SEC investigations and to provide information to them.
The DOJ and SEC investigations are continuing and we are presently unable to predict the duration, scope or results of these investigations or whether either agency will commence any legal actions. The DOJ and the SEC have a broad range of civil and criminal sanctions under the FCPA and other laws and regulations including, but not limited to, injunctive relief, disgorgement, fines, penalties, modifications to business practices including the termination or modification of existing business relationships, the imposition of compliance programs and the retention of a monitor to oversee compliance with the FCPA. While we have recently begun discussions with the DOJ and SEC concerning a resolution of these matters, we are unable to estimate a range of r easonably possible
outcomes of this matter that differs from our aggregate accrual recorded in the third quarter of 2013 of $20.0 million, including interest. The imposition of any of these sanctions or remedial measures could have a material adverse effect on our business or financial condition. We have not to date determined whether any of the activities in question violated the laws of the foreign jurisdictions in which they took place.
On April 13, 2011, a shareholder derivative lawsuit was filed against each of our directors in the Superior Court for Contra Costa County, California. The case, which also names the Company as a nominal defendant, is captioned City of Riviera Beach General Employees' Retirement System v. David Schwartz, et al., Case No. MSC11-00854. In the complaint, the plaintiff alleges that our directors breached their fiduciary duties by failing to ensure that we had sufficient internal controls and systems for compliance with the FCPA. Purportedly seeking relief on our behalf, the plaintiff seeks an award of unspecified compensatory and punitive damages, costs and expenses (including attorneys' fees), and a declaration that our directors have breached their fiduciary duties. We and the individual defendants filed a demurrer requesting dismissal of the complaint in this case, as well as a motion to stay this matter pending resolution of the above-referenced investigations by the DOJ and SEC. Following a hearing on September 30, 2011, the court sustained our demurrer and dismissed the complaint, without prejudice, and granted the plaintiff additional time to file an amended complaint. The court denied our motion to stay this matter because it dismissed the complaint. The parties have agreed to a stipulated dismissal of this case, without prejudice, and to a tolling of the statute of limitations pending the resolution of the DOJ and SEC investigations.
25

In addition, we are party to various other claims, legal actions and complaints arising in the ordinary course of business. We do not believe, at this time, that any ultimate liability resulting from any of these other matters will have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial position or liquidity. However, we cannot give any assurance regarding the ultimate outcome of these other matters and their resolution could be material to our operating results for any particular period, depending on the level of income for the period.
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
This discussion should be read in conjunction with the information contained in both our Consolidated Financial Statements for the year ended December 31, 2012 and the financial statements for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013.
Other than statements of historical fact, statements made in this report include forward looking statements, such as statements with respect to our future financial performance, operating results, plans and objectives that involve risk and uncertainties. Forward-looking statements generally can be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology, such as “believe,” “expect,” “may,” “will,” “intend,” “estimate,” “continue,” or similar expressions or the negative of those terms or expressions. Such statements involve risks and uncertainties, which could cause actual results to vary materially from those expressed in or indicated by the forward-looking statements. We have based these forward looking statements on our current expectations and projections about future events. However, actual results may differ materially from those currently anticipated depending on a variety of risk factors including among other things: changes in general domestic and worldwide economic conditions; our ability to successfully develop and market new products; our reliance on and access to necessary intellectual property; our ability to successfully integrate any acquired business; our substantial leverage and ability to service our debt; competition in and government regulation of the industries in which we operate; and the monetary policies of various countries. We caution you not to place undue reliance on forward-looking statements, which reflect an analysis only and speak only as of the date hereof. We undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise except as required by Federal Securities law.
Overview. We are a multinational manufacturer and worldwide distributor of our own life science research and clinical diagnostics products. Our business is organized into two reportable segments, Life Science and Clinical Diagnostics, with the mission to provide scientists with specialized tools needed for biological research and clinical diagnostics.
We sell more than 8,000 products and services to a diverse client base comprised of scientific research, healthcare, education and government customers worldwide. We manufacture and supply our customers with a range of reagents, apparatus and equipment to separate complex chemical and biological materials and to identify, analyze and purify components. Because our customers require standardization for their experiments and test results, much of our revenues are recurring.
We are impacted by the support of many governments for both research and healthcare. The current global economic outlook is becoming increasingly uncertain as the need to control government social spending by many governments limits opportunities for growth. Approximately 33% of our year-to-date 2013 consolidated net sales are derived from the United States and approximately 67% are derived from international locations, with Europe being our largest region. Our international sales are largely denominated in local currencies such as Euros, Swiss Franc, Japanese Yen, China Yuan and British Sterling. As a result, our consolidated net sales expressed in dollars benefit when the U.S. dollar weakens and suffer when the dollar strengthens. When the U.S. dollar strengthens, we benefit from lower cost of sales from our own international manufacturing sites as well as non-U.S. suppliers and from lower international operating expenses.
26

In September 2013, we redeemed all of the $300.0 million 8.0% Senior Subordinated Notes for $312.0 million, including a call premium of $12.0 million, and expensed the remaining original issuance bond discount of $2.5 million and unamortized bond issuance costs of $1.1 million, all of which are included in Interest expense in our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations.
During the third quarter of 2013, we accrued an aggregate of $20.0 million associated with our initial efforts to resolve the investigations by the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) and Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) relating to the United States Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA), of which $16.0 million was expensed to Selling, general and administrative expenses and $4.0 was expensed to Interest expense.
During the third quarter of 2013, we identified errors in the consolidated financial statements for the years 2008 through 2012 (and for all interim periods therein) and in the unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements for the three month periods ended March 31, 2013 and June 30, 2013, related to the valuation of finished goods inventory in our Life Science segment. We were expensing inventory in amounts greater than actual costs for non-sales transactions, such as expensed inventory used for demonstration purposes and product samples.
The effect of correcting these errors on the 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, and for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 consolidated financial statements were increases to net income of $0.6 million, $0.8 million, $0.7 million, $0.8 million, $1.3 million, $0.3 million and $1.0 million, respectively.
During the third quarter of 2013, we revised the classification of certain amount for all periods presented from “Provision for income taxes” to “Research and development expense” in our Consolidated Statements of Operations to conform to the current year presentation. The amounts reclassified pertain to refundable French R&D tax credit, which after the reclassification reduces Research and development expense. The effect of the reclassifications from Provision for income taxes to Research and development expense for 2010, 2011, 2012, and for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 were $5.8 million, $8.8 million, $4.8 million, $1.2 million and $3.6 million, respectively.
Management evaluated the materiality of the errors from a qualitative and quantitative perspective. Based on such evaluation, we have concluded that while the accumulation of these errors was significant to the three months ended September 30, 2013, their correction would not be material to any individual prior period, nor did they have an effect on the trend of financial results, taking into account the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 108, Considering the Effects of Prior Year Misstatements when Quantifying Misstatements in Current Year Financial Statements (SAB 108). Accordingly, we will correct these errors prospectively when the 2013 Consolidated Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income are included in future filings.
In January 2013, we acquired 100% of the outstanding shares of AbD Serotec, a division of MorphoSys AG, for total consideration of $62.2 million (net of cash received of $7.3 million). This acquisition was accounted for as a business combination and is included in our Life Science segment's results of operations from the acquisition date. The final fair values of the net assets acquired consist of definite-lived intangible assets of $44.0 million, goodwill of $14.9 million and net tangible assets of $3.3 million. These amounts include certain immaterial measurement period adjustments recorded during the second quarter of 2013. We believe that with AbD Serotec's comprehensive catalog of antibodies, we are able to offer our customers total assay solutions that can be validated on many of our research platforms for western blotting, multiplex protein expression, ELISA and cell sorting.
In August 2012, we acquired from Propel Labs, Inc. a new cell sorting system, an automated, easy-to-use benchtop cell sorting flow cytometer. This asset acquisition was accounted for as a business combination and is included in our Life Science segment's results of operations from the acquisition date. The fair value of the consideration as of the acquisition date was $49.6 million, which included $5.0 million paid in cash at the closing date and $44.6 million in contingent consideration related to the achievement of certain development and sales milestones valued at $19.9 million and $24.7 million, respectively, that could potentially be payable to Propel Labs' shareholders. The contingent consideration was revalued to its estimated fair value of $25.2 million as of September 30, 2013. The
27

fair values of the net assets acquired from Propel Labs, Inc. as of the acquisition date were determined to be $17.4 million of goodwill, $32.1 million of definite-lived intangible assets and $0.1 million of net tangible assets. The acquired cell sorting system fits well into Bio-Rad's existing Life Science segment product offerings and may offer researchers greater access to this technology.
In July 2012, we acquired all of the outstanding shares of DiaMed Benelux for 4.6 million Euros (approximately $5.6 million) in cash. This acquisition was accounted for as a business combination and is included in our Clinical Diagnostics segment's results of operations from the acquisition date. We acquired net tangible liabilities with a fair value of $2.3 million and the fair values of the assets acquired as of the acquisition date were determined to be $3.0 million of goodwill and $4.9 million of definite-lived intangible assets. DiaMed Benelux became the exclusive distributor of certain Bio-Rad immunohematology products in the Benelux market as a result of our 2007 acquisition of DiaMed Holding AG. This distributor acquisition is consistent with our stated objective to control the distribution of our own products and services.
In January 2012, we purchased, for cash, certain assets from a raw material supplier for approximately $12.5 million. This asset acquisition was accounted for as a business combination and is included in our Clinical Diagnostics segment's results of operations from the acquisition date. The fair value of the assets acquired at the acquisition date was determined to be $6.3 million of net tangible assets, $5.1 million of intangible assets and $1.1 million of goodwill. In addition, we paid $2.0 million for employment agreements as an incentive to certain employees of the acquired business to remain with Bio-Rad. Such amount will be expensed over two years from the acquisition date and was recorded in Prepaid expenses, taxes and other current assets, and Other assets in our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet. We believe this acquisition allows us to secure the supply of critical raw materials and lower our overall costs in the Clinical Diagnostics segment.
During the fourth quarter of 2011 we recognized a contingent consideration liability upon our acquisition of QuantaLife related to potential future payments due upon the achievement of certain sales and development milestones. The contingent consideration was initially recognized at its estimated fair value of $24.1 million, based on a probability-weighted income approach. As of the acquisition date of October 4, 2011, total contingent consideration could have originally reached a maximum of $48 million upon the achievement of all sales milestones and a development milestone. However, we do not expect that the sales milestones will be met and therefore the remaining contingent consideration of $0.7 million was credited to Selling, general and administrative expense during the third quarter of 2013. The development milestone was met as of December 31, 2012, resulting in a payment of $6.0 million in January 2013.
The following shows cost of goods sold, gross profit, expense items and net (loss) income as a percentage of net sales:

| Three Months Ended |  | Nine Months Ended
| September 30, |  | September 30,
| 2013 |  | 2012 |  | 2013 |  | 2012
Net sales | 100.0 | % |  | 100.0 | % |  | 100.0 | % |  | 100.0 | %
Cost of goods sold | 43.7 |  |  | 45.1 |  |  | 44.1 |  |  | 43.8 |
Gross profit | 56.3 |  |  | 54.9 |  |  | 55.9 |  |  | 56.2 |
Selling, general and administrative expense | 40.0 |  |  | 32.1 |  |  | 38.1 |  |  | 33.0 |
Research and development expense | 10.5 |  |  | 9.6 |  |  | 10.1 |  |  | 10.1 |
Net (loss) income attributable to Bio-Rad | (1.4 | ) |  | 8.5 |  |  | 3.1 |  |  | 8.2 |

28

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
As previously disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012, we have identified accounting for income taxes, valuation of goodwill and long-lived assets, valuation of inventories, warranty reserves, valuation of investments, allowance for doubtful accounts and litigation accruals as the accounting policies and estimates critical to the operations of Bio-Rad.
An accounting policy is deemed to be critical if it requires an accounting estimate to be made based on assumptions about matters that are highly uncertain at the time the estimate is made, if different estimates reasonably could have been used, or if changes in the estimate that are reasonably likely to occur could materially impact the financial statements. Management believes that there have been no significant changes during the nine months ended September 30, 2013 to the items that we disclosed as our critical accounting policies and estimates in Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012. For a full discussion of these policies and estimates, please refer to our Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2012 filed with the SEC.
Three Months Ended September 30, 2013 Compared to
Three Months Ended September 30, 2012
Results of Operations -- Sales, Margins and Expenses
Net sales (sales) for the third quarter of 2013 were $505.1 million compared to $498.7 million in the third quarter of 2012, an increase of 1.3%. Excluding the impact of foreign currency, third quarter 2013 sales increased by approximately 1.8% compared to the same period in 2012. Currency neutral sales growth was reflected in the Americas, while currency neutral sales in Asia and Europe declined.
The Life Science segment sales for the third quarter of 2013 were $162.9 million, a decrease of 2.5% compared to the same period last year. On a currency neutral basis, sales decreased 1.2% compared to the third quarter in 2012. The currency neutral sales decrease was primarily attributable to Laboratory Separations and Gene Expression products, partially offset by sales in the newly acquired AbD Serotec and our Droplet Digital™ PCR product line. Currency neutral sales declined in all three major regions, with the greatest decline in Asia. Sequestration and global government austerity programs have slowed U.S., European and Japanese market growth.
The Clinical Diagnostics segment sales for the third quarter of 2013 were $338.8 million, an increase of 3.2% compared to the same period last year. On a currency neutral basis, sales also increased 3.2% compared to the third quarter in 2012. Clinical Diagnostics had growth across most product lines on a currency neutral basis, most notably from diabetes, BioPlex® 2200 system and quality controls. Currency neutral sales growth was primarily in China and Latin America, while currency neutral sales in Western Europe declined.
Consolidated gross margins were 56.3% for the third quarter of 2013 compared to 54.9% for the third quarter of 2012. Life Science segment gross margins for the third quarter of 2013 increased by approximately 3.3 percentage points from the same period last year primarily due to a $3.8 million soil remediation expense associated with a manufacturing plant that occurred in the third quarter of 2012, and a $2.9 million credit related to a correction for the first half of this year for the valuation of finished goods inventory. Gross margins growth for the third quarter of 2013 was partially offset by costs related to inventory sold with a higher cost due to purchase accounting, and purchased intangibles amortization expense of $2.0 million related to the AbD Serotec and cell sorting system acquisitions. The amortization expense related to the AbD Serotec acquisition will continue to negatively impact Life Science segment gross margins in comparison to the prior year periods for the remainder of the year. Clinical Diagnostics segment gross margins for the third quarter of 2013 increased by approximately 0.5 percentage points from the same period last year. The increase was primarily due to favorable product mix and a $0.6 million competitiveness tax credit that was recorded in the third quarter of 2013. Gross margins were partially offset by
29

approximately 0.35% due to the excise tax on the sales of certain medical devices in the U.S. that went into effect in 2013. We accounted for this tax as a period cost in Cost of goods sold. Clinical Diagnostics segment gross margins in comparison to the prior year periods will continue to be negatively affected by the excise tax on the sales of certain medical devices in the U.S. for the remainder of the year.
Selling, general and administrative expenses (SG&A) represented 40.0% of sales for the third quarter of 2013 compared to 32.1% of sales for the third quarter of 2012. Increases in SG&A expense relative to sales were primarily driven by:

• | an accrual of $16.0 million in connection with our initial efforts to resolve the SEC and DOJ investigations relating to the FCPA that was recorded in the third quarter of 2013,

• | an increase of $10.8 million of employee-related expenses, our largest cost, associated with an increase in headcount that included acquisitions,

• | the favorable impact of a 2012 revaluation to the fair value of the QuantaLife contingent consideration of $8.5 million,

• | an increase in professional services of $4.3 million primarily related to the first phase of a global single instance Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) system being placed in service, and legal and accounting services, and

• | an increase in software amortization of $2.7 million due to the first phase of the ERP system being placed in service.

Research and development expense (R&D) increased to $52.9 million or 10.5% of sales in the third quarter of 2013 compared to $47.8 million or 9.6% of sales in the third quarter of 2012. Life Science segment R&D increased in the third quarter of 2013 from the prior year quarter primarily due to the AbD Serotec and cell sorting system acquisitions. Clinical Diagnostics segment R&D increased in the third quarter of 2013 from the prior year period primarily due to lower refundable French R&D tax credits, and a broadening of on-going development across a wider range of products.
Results of Operations – Non-operating
Interest expense for the third quarter of 2013 increased by $19.7 million to $31.6 million compared to $11.9 million for the third quarter of 2012 primarily due to the early redemption of our $300.0 million principal amount of Senior Subordinated Notes (8.0% Notes) on September 30, 2013, resulting in a $15.6 million loss. We recorded the loss on extinguishment within Interest expense. The redemption of the 8.0% Notes included a call premium of $12.0 million, the expensing of $2.5 million of the remaining original issuance bond discount and the expensing of unamortized debt issuance costs of $1.1 million. In addition, Interest expense included an accrual of $4.0 million of interest expense associated with our initial efforts to resolve the DOJ and SEC investigations relating to the FCPA that was recorded in the third quarter of 2013.
Foreign currency exchange gains and losses consist of foreign currency transaction gains and losses on intercompany net receivables and payables and the change in fair value of our forward foreign exchange contracts used to manage our foreign currency exchange risk. Foreign currency exchange losses, net for the quarter ended September 30, 2013 increased compared to the prior year period primarily attributable to an unfavorable result of the estimating process inherent in the timing of shipments and payments, and higher transaction costs.
Other (income) expense, net for the third quarter of 2013 decreased to $0.7 million income compared to $1.5 million income for the third quarter of 2012 primarily due to realized gains on the sale of equity investments in the third quarter of 2012 compared to realized losses in the third quarter of 2013. Sales of investments in the third quarter of 2013 were used to provide cash to redeem all of the $300.0 million 8.0% Senior Subordinated Notes.
Our effective tax rate was (36)% and 23% for the third quarter of 2013 and 2012, respectively. The effective tax rate for the third quarter of 2013 was higher than expected due to discrete items related primarily to tax liabilities for unrecognized tax benefits and audit settlements in our foreign jurisdictions. The effective tax rate for the third quarter is negative because of pretax loss incurred in the third quarter. The effective tax rate for the third quarter of
30

2012 was lower than the U.S. statutory rate primarily due to tax benefits from differences between U.S. and foreign statutory tax rates, and research and development tax credits. For the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, our foreign taxes resulted primarily from taxable income earned in France and Switzerland. Switzerland's statutory tax rate is significantly lower than the U.S. statutory tax rate of 35%. Also, our effective tax rates for the third quarter of 2013 and 2012 were reduced by French tax incentives related to our research and development activities.
We file federal, state and foreign income tax returns in many jurisdictions in the United States and abroad. Our income tax returns are audited by federal, state and foreign tax authorities. We are currently under examination by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) for the 2009 and 2010 tax years and by various state and foreign jurisdictions. There are differing interpretations of tax laws and regulations, and as a result, significant disputes may arise with these tax authorities involving issues of the timing and amount of deductions and allocations of income among various tax jurisdictions. We periodically evaluate our exposures associated with our tax filing positions.
As of September 30, 2013, based on the expected outcome of certain examinations or as a result of the expiration of statute of limitations for certain jurisdictions, we believe that within the next 12 months it is reasonably possible that our previously unrecognized tax benefits could decrease by approximately $1.4 million. Substantially all such amounts will impact our effective income tax rate.
We record liabilities for unrecognized tax benefits related to uncertain tax positions. We do not believe any currently pending uncertain tax positions will have a material adverse effect on our condensed consolidated financial statements, although an adverse resolution of one or more of these uncertain tax positions in any period may have a material impact on the results of operations for that period.
Our effective tax rate may be impacted in the future, either favorably or unfavorably, by many factors including, but not limited to, changes to statutory tax rates, changes in tax laws or regulations, tax audits and settlements, and the generation of tax credits.
In September of 2013, the U.S. Department of the Treasury and the Internal Revenue Service released final regulations regarding the deductibility and capitalization of expenditures related to tangible property. Compliance with these final regulations will be required with companies’ federal income tax returns for tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2014, although early adoption is available. We are currently assessing these rules and the impact to the financial statements, if any. We do not anticipate that these regulations will have a material impact on our consolidated results of operations, cash flows or financial position.
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2013 Compared to
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2012
Results of Operations -- Sales, Margins and Expenses
Net sales (sales) for the first nine months of 2013 were $1.53 billion compared to $1.50 billion for the first nine months of 2012, an increase of 2.3%. Excluding the impact of foreign currency, the first nine months of 2013 sales increased by approximately 3.1% compared to the same period in 2012. Currency neutral sales growth was reflected in most regions, primarily in the Pacific Rim, the Americas and the emerging markets of Eastern Europe, while currency neutral sales in Western Europe decreased.
The Life Science segment sales for the first nine months of 2013 were $489.5 million, an increase of 1.1% compared to the same period last year. On a currency neutral basis, sales increased 2.5% compared to the first nine months of 2012. The sales increase was primarily driven by sales from the newly acquired AbD Serotec, our Droplet Digital™ PCR and cell biology product lines. Currency neutral sales increased in the Americas, while Europe was relatively unchanged and Asia declined. Global government austerity programs have slowed U.S., European and Japanese market growth.
31

The Clinical Diagnostics segment sales for the first nine months of 2013 were $1.03 billion, an increase of 3.1% compared to the same period last year. On a currency neutral basis, sales increased 3.6% compared to the first nine months of 2012. Clinical Diagnostics had growth across most product lines on a currency neutral basis, most notably from quality controls, diabetes and BioPlex® 2200 system. Currency neutral sales growth was primarily in Eastern Europe, China, Asia Pacific and the Americas, while currency neutral sales in Western Europe declined.
Consolidated gross margins were 55.9% for the first nine months of 2013 compared to 56.2% for the same period last year. Life Science segment gross margins for the first nine months of 2013 decreased by approximately 0.2 percentage points from the same period last year. The decrease was primarily due to costs related to inventory sold with a higher cost due to purchase accounting, and purchased intangibles amortization expense of $6.3 million related to the AbD Serotec and cell sorting system acquisitions, partially offset by a $3.8 million soil remediation expense associated with a manufacturing plant that occurred in the third quarter of 2012. The amortization expense related to the AbD Serotec acquisition will continue to negatively impact Life Science segment gross margins in comparison to the prior year periods for the remainder of the year. Clinical Diagnostics segment gross margins for the first nine months of 2013 decreased by approximately 0.2 percentage points from the same period last year. The decrease was primarily due to some large low margin government tenders, a less favorable product mix, and an increase in obsolescence charges. Gross margins also decreased by approximately 0.35% due to the excise tax on the sales of certain medical devices in the U.S. that went into effect in 2013, which we accounted for as a period cost in Cost of goods sold. Clinical Diagnostics segment lower gross margins were partially offset by a foreign supplemental tax associated with social benefits of $4.1 million that occurred in the first nine months of 2012, and a $0.6 million French Competitiveness Tax Credit that was recorded in the third quarter of 2013.
Selling, general and administrative expenses (SG&A) represented 38.1% of sales for the first nine months of 2013 compared to 33.0% of sales for the first nine months of 2012. Increases in SG&A expense relative to sales were primarily driven by:

• | an increase of $37.9 million of employee-related expenses, our largest cost, associated with an increase in headcount that included acquisitions,

• | the favorable impact of a 2012 revaluation to the fair value of the QuantaLife contingent consideration of $16.0 million,

• | an accrual of $16.0 million in connection with our initial efforts to resolve the SEC and DOJ investigations relating to the FCPA that was recorded in the third quarter of 2013,

• | an increase in professional services of $15.9 million primarily related to the first phase of a global single instance ERP system being placed in service, and legal and accounting services,

• | an increase of $6.6 million as the first nine months of 2012 benefited from lower bad debt expense, primarily in Spain due to a large sum of payments by public agencies, causing us to revise our estimate for the allowance for doubtful accounts, and

• | an increase of $6.1 million in software amortization due to the first phase of the ERP platform being placed in service.

R&D increased to $155.1 million or 10.1% of sales in the first nine months of 2013 compared to $150.6 million or 10.1% of sales in the first nine months of 2012. Life Science segment R&D decreased in the first nine months of 2013 from the prior year period primarily due to projects nearing completion. Clinical Diagnostics segment R&D increased in the first nine months of 2013 from the prior year period primarily due to lower refundable French R&D tax credits, and a broadening of on-going development across a wider range of products.
Results of Operations – Non-operating
Interest expense for the first nine months of 2013 increased by $16.8 million to $54.3 million compared to $37.5 million for the first nine months of 2012 primarily due to the early redemption of our 8.0% Notes on September 30, 2013, resulting in a $15.6 million loss. We recorded the loss on extinguishment within Interest expense. The redemption of the 8.0% Notes included a call premium of $12.0 million, the expensing of $2.5 million of the remaining original issuance bond discount and the expensing of unamortized debt issuance costs of $1.1 million. In
32

addition, Interest expense included an accrual of $4.0 million of interest expense associated with our initial efforts to resolve the DOJ and SEC investigations relating to the FCPA that was recorded in the third quarter of 2013. The increase was partially offset by estimated interest expense of $1.2 million included in the first quarter of 2012 that was associated with a foreign supplemental tax related to social benefits, and interest on back royalties in the first nine months of 2012.
Foreign currency exchange gains and losses consist of foreign currency transaction gains and losses on intercompany net receivables and payables and the change in fair value of our forward foreign exchange contracts used to manage our foreign currency exchange risk. Foreign currency exchange losses, net for the first nine months of 2013 increased compared to the same period last year primarily attributable to an unfavorable result of the estimating process inherent in the timing of shipments and payments, and higher transaction costs.
Other (income) expense, net for the first nine months of 2013 decreased to $10.7 million income compared to $14.7 million income for the first nine months of 2012 primarily due to higher realized gains associated with the sale of equity investments in the first nine months of 2012 compared to realized losses in the first nine months of 2013. Sales of investments in the third quarter of 2013 were used to provide cash to redeem all of the $300.0 million 8.0% Senior Subordinated Notes.
Our effective tax rate was 30% and 28% for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012. The first nine months of 2013 reflected a significant tax benefit related to the 2012 U.S. federal research credit, which was retroactively reinstated on January 2, 2013, as well as discrete items related primarily to tax liabilities for unrecognized tax benefits and audit settlements in our foreign jurisdictions. The effective tax rates for both periods were lower than the U.S. statutory rate primarily due to tax benefits from differences between U.S. and foreign statutory tax rates, and research and development tax credits. For the first nine months of 2013 and 2012, our foreign taxes resulted primarily from taxable income earned in France and Switzerland. Switzerland's statutory tax rate is significantly lower than the U.S. statutory tax rate of 35%. Also, our effective tax rates for the first nine months of 2013 and 2012 were reduced by French tax incentives related to our research and development activities.
Our effective tax rate may be impacted in the future, either favorably or unfavorably, by many factors including, but not limited to, changes to statutory tax rates, changes in tax laws or regulations, tax audits and settlements, and the generation of tax credits.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Bio-Rad operates and conducts business globally, primarily through subsidiary companies established in the markets in which we trade. Goods are manufactured in a small number of locations, and are then shipped to local distribution facilities around the world. Our product mix is diversified, and certain products compete largely on product efficacy, while others compete on price. Gross margins are generally sufficient to exceed normal operating costs, and funding for research and development of new products, as well as routine outflows of capital expenditure, interest and taxes. In addition to the annual positive cash flow from operating activities, additional liquidity is readily available via the sale of short-term investments and access to our $200.0 million Amended and Restated Credit Agreement (Credit Agreement) that we entered into in June 2010. Borrowings under the Credit Agreement are on a revolving basis and can be used to make acquisitions, for working capital and for other general corporate purposes. We had no outstanding borrowings under the Credit Agreement as of September 30, 2013. The Credit Agreement expires on June 21, 2014.
At September 30, 2013, we had $561.8 million in cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments, of which approximately 38% was held in our foreign subsidiaries. We believe that our holdings of cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments in the U.S. and in our foreign subsidiaries are sufficient to meet both the current and long-term needs of our global operations. The amount of funds held in the United States can fluctuate due to the timing of receipts and payments in the ordinary course of business and due to other reasons, such as business-development activities. As part of our ongoing liquidity assessments, we regularly monitor the mix of domestic and foreign cash
33

flows (both inflows and outflows). Repatriation of overseas funds will result in additional U.S. federal and state income tax payments. In general, it is our practice and intention to indefinitely reinvest the cash generated by our foreign subsidiaries in our foreign subsidiaries' operations.
Under domestic and international lines of credit, we had $219.7 million available for borrowing as of September 30, 2013, of which $11.3 million is reserved for standby letters of credit issued by our banks to guarantee our obligations, mostly to meet the deductible amount under insurance policies for our benefit. Management believes that this availability, together with cash flow from operations, will be adequate to meet our current objectives for operations, research and development, capital additions for manufacturing and distribution, plant and equipment, information technology systems and an acquisition of reasonable proportion to our existing total available capital.
The continuing slow economic growth in developed nations, including sequestration in the U.S., may adversely affect our future results of operations. Demand for our products and services could change more dramatically than in previous years based on activity, funding, reimbursement constraints and support levels from government, universities, hospitals and private industry, including diagnostic laboratories. The need for certain sovereign nations with large annual deficits to curtail spending could lead to slower growth of, or even a decline in, our business. Sovereign nations either delaying payment for goods and services or renegotiating their debts could impact our liquidity. The situation in these sovereign nations is continuously evolving and we have no greater knowledge of the situation other than what is publicly reported. As of September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, we had accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts, in Spain, Italy, Greece and Portugal of $66.7 million and $64.8 million, respectively.
The instability in credit markets along with inadequate capitalization in some parts of the financial services industry could impact both our ability and our customer's ability to access the necessary capital for acquisition, equipment and technology modernization, and the financing of inventories and receivables. Without this crucial intermediary function, manufacturers and end users may have to renegotiate existing arrangements, reduce activity levels or seek other business partners.
Cash Flows from Operations
Net cash provided by operations was $102.0 million and $180.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The decrease in cash flows primarily resulted from:

• | higher cash paid to suppliers and employees, mostly due to higher bonus payments than the prior year and an increase in headcount that included acquisitions,

• | an increase in outside services as we placed in service during the second quarter of 2013 the first phase of a global single instance ERP platform, moving to expense in the post-implementation/operation stage from capitalizing in the application development stage in the prior year period,

• | 2012 benefited from an approximately $20 million payment for multiple years of Spanish receivables,

• | an increase in interest paid primarily due to the early redemption of the $300.0 million of 8.0% Senior Subordinated Notes on September 30, 2013, and

• | a payment settlement for a royalties audit of $12 million in the second quarter of 2013,

• | slightly offset by lower income tax payments and higher customer receipts.

Cash Flows from Investing Activities
Net cash provided by investing activities was $36.9 million compared to net cash used in investing activities was $340.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. Purchases for marketable securities and investments was lower than the prior year period primarily due to engaging new investment managers in 2012 and hence increased our purchases. Proceeds from the sale of marketable securities and investments was higher than the prior year period primarily to provide cash to redeem all of the $300.0 million 8.0% Senior Subordinated Notes.
34

Our investment objective is to maintain liquidity to meet anticipated operational and other corporate requirements in which capital is preserved and increased through investing in low risk, high quality securities with commensurate returns, consistent with our risk tolerance level.
Capital expenditures totaled $83.4 million and $112.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. Capital expenditures represent the addition and replacement of production machinery and research equipment, ongoing manufacturing and facility additions for expansion, regulatory, environmental and compliance. Also included in capital expenditures are investments in business systems and data communication upgrades and enhancements. All periods include equipment placed with Clinical Diagnostics segment customers who then contract to purchase our reagents for use. Capital expenditures were lower for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 compared to the same period last year as we placed in service the first phase of a global single instance ERP platform and moved to expense for the post-implementation/operation stage from capitalization for the application development stage in the prior year period. However, as we continue to implement more phases of the ERP platform and expand our e-commerce platform, we expect capital expenditures to increase and continue to remain historically higher for the next four years or more. The estimated global implementation cost for the single instance ERP platform could exceed $200 million and is estimated to take approximately four or more years to fully implement.
Payments for acquisitions, net of cash received, and long-term investments was higher than the prior year period primarily due to the following:

• | in January 2013, we acquired 100% of the outstanding shares of AbD Serotec, a division of MorphoSys AG, for total consideration of $62.2 million (net of cash received of $7.3 million),

• | in August 2012, we acquired from Propel Labs, Inc. a new cell sorting system, in which the fair value of the consideration as of the acquisition date was $49.6 million that included $5.0 million paid in cash at the closing date and $44.6 million in contingent consideration related to the achievement of certain development and sales milestones, which could potentially be payable to Propel Labs' shareholders,

• | in July 2012, we acquired all of the outstanding shares of DiaMed Benelux for 4.6 million Euros (approximately $5.6 million) in cash, and

• | in January 2012, we purchased, for cash, certain assets from a raw material supplier for approximately $12.5 million.

We continue to review possible acquisitions to expand both our Life Science and Clinical Diagnostics segments. We routinely meet with the principals or brokers of the subject companies. It is not certain at this time that any of these discussions involving material or significant acquisitions will advance to completion.
Cash Flows from Financing Activities
Net cash used in financing activities was $315.5 million compared to net cash provided by financing activities was $9.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. Net cash used in financing activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 was primarily due to the early redemption of the $300.0 million of 8.0% Senior Subordinated Notes on September 30, 2013. Also in 2013, $19.9 million was paid to Propel Labs' shareholders in contingent consideration associated with the valuation as of the 2012 acquisition date, and $5.6 million was paid to QuantaLife in contingent consideration associated with the valuation as of the 2011 acquisition date. Net cash provided by financing activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 was primarily due to proceeds from the issuance of common stock.
We have outstanding Senior Notes of $425 million, which are not due until 2020. As indicated above, we redeemed all of the Senior Subordinated Notes of $300 million on September 30, 2013. The redemption without replacing this borrowing resulted in less cash, cash equivalents and short-term borrowings. We believe the current cash is sufficient to meet normal operating costs, and funding for research and development of new products, as well as routine outflows of capital expenditure, interest and taxes.
35

The Credit Agreement that was entered into in June 2010, is secured by substantially all of our personal property assets, the assets of our domestic subsidiaries and 65% of the capital stock of certain foreign subsidiaries. It is guaranteed by all of our existing and future material domestic subsidiaries and expires in June 2014.
The Board of Directors has authorized the repurchase of up to $18.0 million of Bio-Rad's common stock, of which $3.3 million has yet to be repurchased as of September 30, 2013. The Credit Agreement limits our ability to repurchase our stock. In accordance with the terms of awards under the 2007 Incentive Award Plan, in June 2012, we withheld 122 shares of our Class A common stock and 917 shares of our Class B common stock to satisfy tax obligations due upon the vesting of restricted stock of certain of our employees, which is considered a repurchase of our stock. We had no other repurchases of our stock during the first nine months of 2013 or 2012.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
During the nine months ended September 30, 2013, there have been no material changes from the disclosures about market risk provided in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
At December 31, 2012, we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures. Based on that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer concluded that, although our disclosure controls and procedures were generally effective in timely alerting them to material information relating to us and our consolidated subsidiaries required to be disclosed in the reports we file and submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective at the reasonable assurance level due to a material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting (a “material weakness”) as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act. We describe that material weakness below.
We discovered the material weakness in connection with the assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and the preparation of our financial statements as of December 31, 2012. A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. The key elements constituting the material weakness were significant deficiencies in controls over our financial reporting as of December 31, 2012, which continue as of September 30, 2013, with respect to our accounting close, revenue recognition, reagent rental and expenditure processes. These significant deficiencies, when aggregated, constitute a material weakness as of September 30, 2013. A significant deficiency is defined as a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting that is less severe than a material weakness, yet important enough to merit attention by those responsible for oversight of our financial reporting (a “significant deficiency”).
We assessed the impact at September 30, 2013 of the Inventory error discussed in Note 1 of our condensed consolidated financial statements and have concluded that the related control failure is an element of the existing significant deficiency related to our accounting close. The four significant deficiencies that we identified at December 31, 2012 in our internal control over financial reporting that remain at September 30, 2013 are as follows:
36

Inadequate Accounting Close Process including:

• | Our failure to review and adjust a contingency accrual with respect to royalties owed to a third party in a timely manner;

• | We were expensing inventory in an amount greater than actual costs for non-sales transactions, such as expensed inventory used for demonstration purposes and product samples;

• | Inadequate supporting documentation for certain key transactions and account reconciliations at some of our foreign locations; and

• | Our lack of adequate financial statement review at our German subsidiary.

Inadequate Revenue Recognition Process including:

• | The unauthorized issuance of distributor contracts at our Chinese subsidiary;

• | Our lack of controls over pricing and our ineffective methods of analyzing credit risk; and

• | In some instances, the lack of sufficient documentation for the timing of revenue recognition.

Inadequate Reagent Rental Process at Certain of Our International Subsidiaries including:

• | Our failure to provide management review of reagent rental agreements;

• | Our failure to monitor ongoing compliance with agreement terms; and

• | Our lack of timely reconciliations of our reagent rental equipment.

Inadequate Expenditure Controls at our German Subsidiary including:

• | Our lack of compliance with controls for vendor management and transaction approvals; and

• | Insufficient segregation of duties.

In addition, during the quarter ended March 31, 2013, management identified errors in the reporting of the Consolidated Statements of Other Comprehensive Income for the years ended in 2010, 2011 and 2012 and in the unaudited interim Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for all three quarters of 2012, which affected two line items (see “Correction of Immaterial Errors Associated with the Presentation and Disclosure of the Statements of Comprehensive Income” in Note 1 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements). While these errors resulted in no change in Other comprehensive income, net of tax, we determined that they were the result of a control deficiency in our financial reporting process that constituted a significant deficiency in our internal control over financial reporting. Remediation for this item continues and will be included in our enhanced spreadsheet controls, which is currently part of our overall remediation efforts. We have made changes in our financial reporting process in order to correctly calculate these values.
With the oversight of senior management and our audit committee, we have begun taking steps and plan to take additional measures to remediate the underlying causes of the material weakness, primarily through the development and implementation of improved controls, processes and procedures. While our remediation efforts are in process, they have not been completed. Accordingly, our management has concluded that the material weakness still exists as of September 30, 2013.
We cannot assure you that we will be able to remediate these significant deficiencies and the resulting material weakness or that additional significant deficiencies or material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting will not be identified in the future. Any failure to maintain or implement new or improved internal controls, or any difficulties that we may encounter in their maintenance or implementation, could result in additional significant deficiencies or material weaknesses, result in material misstatements in our financial statements and cause us to fail to meet our reporting obligations, which in turn could cause the trading price of our common stock to decline.
37

Changes to Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Other than the changes discussed above, we identified no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during our quarter ended September 30, 2013 that have materially affected, or that are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting. We are utilizing the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) 1992 Framework on internal control.
PART II – OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
See Note 13, “Legal Proceedings” in the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements of Part 1, Item 1 of this Form 10-Q.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
The ongoing investigation by government agencies of possible violations by us of the United States Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and similar laws could have a material adverse effect on our business.
Based on an internal investigation, we identified conduct in certain of our overseas operations that may have violated the anti-bribery provisions of the United States Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) and is likely to have violated the FCPA's books and records and internal controls provisions and our own internal policies. In May 2010, we voluntarily disclosed these matters to the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) and the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), each of which commenced an investigation. The Audit Committee of our Board of Directors (Audit Committee) assumed direct responsibility for reviewing these matters and hired experienced independent counsel to conduct an investigation and provide legal advice. We provided additional information to the DOJ and the SEC as the Audit Committee's investigation progressed. Following the completion of the Audit Committee’s investigation, we continue to cooperate with the DOJ and SEC investigations and to provide information to them.
The DOJ and SEC investigations are continuing and we are presently unable to predict the duration, scope or results of these investigations or whether either agency will commence any legal actions. The DOJ and the SEC have a broad range of civil and criminal sanctions under the FCPA and other laws and regulations including, but not limited to, injunctive relief, disgorgement, fines, penalties, modifications to business practices including the termination or modification of existing business relationships, the imposition of compliance programs and the retention of a monitor to oversee compliance with the FCPA. We are engaged in discussions with the DOJ and SEC concerning a resolution of these matters, but we are unable to estimate the outcome of these discussions or whether we will be able to reach mutually acceptable settlements. However, the imposition of any of these sanctions or remedial measures could have a material adverse effect on our business, including our results of operations, cash balance and credit rates. We have not to date determined whether any of the activities in question violated the laws of the foreign jurisdictions in which they took place.
On April 13, 2011, a shareholder derivative lawsuit was filed against each of our directors in the Superior Court for Contra Costa County, California. The case, which also names the Company as a nominal defendant, is captioned City of Riviera Beach General Employees' Retirement System v. David Schwartz, et al., Case No. MSC11-00854. In the complaint, the plaintiff alleges that our directors breached their fiduciary duties by failing to ensure that we had sufficient internal controls and systems for compliance with the FCPA. Purportedly seeking relief on our behalf, the plaintiff seeks an award of unspecified compensatory and punitive damages, costs and expenses (including attorneys' fees), and a declaration that our directors have breached their fiduciary duties. We and the individual defendants filed a demurrer requesting dismissal of the complaint in this case, as well as a motion to stay this matter pending resolution of the above-referenced investigations by the DOJ and SEC. Following a hearing on
38

September 30, 2011, the court sustained our demurrer and dismissed the complaint, without prejudice, and granted the plaintiff additional time to file an amended complaint. The court denied our motion to stay this matter because it dismissed the complaint. The parties have agreed to a stipulated dismissal of this case, without prejudice, and to a tolling of the statute of limitations pending the resolution of the DOJ and SEC investigations.
We have not completed our actions to remediate previously identified significant deficiencies in our internal control over financial reporting that, when aggregated, constitute a material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting as of September 30, 2013. Our failure to establish and maintain effective internal control over financial reporting could result in our failure to meet our reporting obligations and cause investors to lose confidence in our reported financial information, which in turn could cause the trading price of our common stock to decline.
In connection with our assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and the preparation of our financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2012, our management identified four significant deficiencies in our internal control over financial reporting which continue as of September 30, 2013. These significant deficiencies, when aggregated, continue to constitute a material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting as of September 30, 2013. A significant deficiency is defined as a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting that is less severe than a material weakness, yet important enough to merit attention by those responsible for oversight of our financial reporting. A material weakness is defined as a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of our annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis.
We assessed the impact at September 30, 2013 of the inventory error discussed in Note 1 of our condensed consolidated financial statements and have concluded that the related control failure is an element of the existing significant deficiency related to our accounting close. The four significant deficiencies that we identified at December 31, 2012 are the result of: (i) an inadequate accounting close process, including our failure to review and adjust a contingency accrual with respect to royalties owed to a third party in a timely manner, expensing inventory at a higher amount than actual costs for non-sales transactions, inadequate supporting documentation for certain key transactions and account reconciliations at some of our foreign locations, and our lack of adequate financial statement review at our German subsidiary; (ii) an inadequate revenue recognition process, including the unauthorized execution of distributor contracts at our Chinese subsidiary, our lack of controls over pricing and our ineffective methods of analyzing credit risk, and in some instances, the lack of sufficient documentation for the timing of revenue recognition; (iii) an inadequate reagent rental process at certain of our international subsidiaries, including our failure to provide management review of reagent rental agreements, our failure to monitor ongoing compliance with agreement terms, and our lack of timely reconciliations of our reagent rental equipment; and (iv) inadequate expenditure controls at our German subsidiary, including our lack of compliance with controls for vendor management and transaction approvals, and insufficient segregation of duties.
In addition, during the quarter ended March 31, 2013, management identified errors in the reporting of the Consolidated Statements of Other Comprehensive Income for the years ended in 2010, 2011 and 2012 and in the unaudited interim Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for all three quarters of 2012, which affected two line items (see “Correction of Immaterial Errors Associated with the Presentation and Disclosure of the Statements of Comprehensive Income” in Note 1 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements). While these errors resulted in no change in Other comprehensive income, net of tax, we determined that they were the result of a control deficiency in our financial reporting process that constituted a significant deficiency in our internal control over financial reporting. Remediation for this item continues and will be included in our enhanced spreadsheet controls, which is currently part of our overall remediation efforts. We have made changes in our financial reporting process in order to correctly calculate these values.
We cannot assure you that we will be able to remediate these significant deficiencies and the resulting material weakness or that additional significant deficiencies or material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting will not be identified in the future. Any failure to maintain or implement new or improved internal controls, or any difficulties that we may encounter in their maintenance or implementation, could result in
39

additional significant deficiencies or material weaknesses, result in material misstatements in our financial statements and cause us to fail to meet our reporting obligations, which in turn could cause the trading price of our common stock to decline. Any such failure has and could in the future adversely affect the results of our periodic management evaluations and annual auditor attestation reports regarding the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting required by Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
Adverse changes in general domestic and worldwide economic conditions and instability and disruption of credit markets could adversely affect our operating results, financial condition or liquidity.
The continuing slow economic growth in developed nations may adversely affect our future results of operations. Demand for our products and services could change more dramatically than in previous years based on activity, funding, reimbursement constraints and support levels from government, universities, hospitals and private industry, including diagnostic laboratories. The need for certain sovereign nations with large annual deficits to curtail spending could lead to slower growth of, or even a decline in, our business. Although signs of limited recovery may exist in some markets, there are continued concerns about systemic economic imbalance, the availability and cost of credit, declining asset values and geopolitical issues that contribute to increased market volatility and uncertain expectations for the global economy. These conditions, combined with greater volatility in business activity levels and consumer confidence, high unemployment and volatile oil prices, contributed to unprecedented levels of volatility in the capital markets in recent years. Continuing or recurring disruptions in the capital and credit markets may adversely affect our business, results of operations, cash flows and financial condition.
As a result of these market conditions, the cost and availability of credit has been and may continue to be adversely affected by illiquid credit markets and wider credit spreads. Concern about the stability of the markets generally and the strength of counterparties specifically has led many private sector investors to reduce and, in some cases, cease to provide credit to governments, businesses and consumers. These factors have led to depressed spending by some governments, businesses and consumers. Our customers and suppliers may experience cash flow concerns and, as a result, customers may modify, delay or cancel plans to purchase our products and suppliers may increase their prices, reduce their output or change terms of sales. Additionally, if customers' or suppliers' operating and financial performance deteriorates, or if they are unable to make scheduled payments or obtain credit, customers may not be able to pay, or may delay payment of, amounts owed to us. Sovereign nations either delaying payment for goods and services or renegotiating their debts could impact our liquidity. The situation in these sovereign nations is continuously evolving and we have no greater knowledge of the situation other than what is publicly reported. As of September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, we had accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts, in Spain, Italy, Greece and Portugal of $66.7 million and $64.8 million, respectively.
Suppliers may restrict credit or impose less favorable payment terms. Any inability of current and/or potential customers to pay us for our products or any demands by suppliers for accelerated payment terms may adversely affect our earnings and cash flow. Additionally, strengthening of the U.S. dollar associated with the global financial crisis may adversely affect the results of our international operations when those results are translated into U.S. dollars.
Furthermore, the disruption in the credit markets could impede our access to capital, especially if we are unable to maintain our current credit ratings. Should we have limited access to additional financing sources when needed, we may decide to defer capital expenditures or seek other higher cost sources of liquidity, which may or may not be available to us on acceptable terms. Continued turbulence in the U.S. and international markets and economies, and prolonged declines in business and consumer spending may adversely affect our liquidity and financial condition, and the liquidity and financial condition of our customers, including our ability to refinance maturing liabilities and access the capital markets to meet liquidity needs.
40

We cannot assure you that we will be able to integrate acquired companies, products or technologies into our company successfully, or we may not be able to realize the anticipated benefits from the acquisitions.
As part of our overall business strategy, we pursue acquisitions of and investments in complementary companies, products and technologies. In order to be successful in these activities, we must, among other things:

• | assimilate the operations and personnel of acquired companies;

• | retain acquired business customers;

• | minimize potential disruption to our ongoing business;

• | retain key technical and management personnel;

• | integrate acquired companies into our strategic and financial plans;

• | accurately assess the value of target companies, products and technologies;

• | comply with new regulatory requirements;

• | harmonize standards, controls, procedures and policies;

• | minimize the impact to our relationships with our employees and customers; and

• | assess, document and remediate any deficiencies in disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting.

The benefits of any acquisition may prove to be less than anticipated and may not outweigh the costs reported in our financial statements. Completing any potential future acquisition could cause significant diversion of our management's time and resources. If we acquire new companies, products or technologies, we may be required to assume contingent liabilities or record impairment charges for goodwill and other intangible assets over time. We cannot assure you that we will successfully overcome these risks or any other problems we encounter in connection with any acquisitions, and any such acquisitions could adversely affect our business, financial position or operating results.
The industries and market segments in which we operate are highly competitive, and we may not be able to compete effectively with larger companies with greater financial resources than we have.
The life science and clinical diagnostics markets are each highly competitive. Some of our competitors have greater financial resources than we do and are less leveraged than we are, making them better equipped to license technologies and intellectual property from third parties or to fund research and development, manufacturing and marketing efforts. Moreover, competitive and regulatory conditions in many markets in which we operate restrict our ability to fully recover, through price increases, higher costs of acquired goods and services resulting from inflation and other drivers of cost increases. Our competitors can be expected to continue to improve the design and performance of their products and to introduce new products with competitive price and performance characteristics. Maintaining these advantages will require us to continue to invest in research and development, sales and marketing and customer service and support. We cannot assure you that we will have sufficient resources to continue to make such investments or that we will be successful in maintaining such advantages.
We have significant international operations which subject us to various risks such as general economic and market conditions in the countries in which we operate.
A significant portion of our sales are made outside of the United States. Our foreign subsidiaries generated 67% of our net sales for the nine months ended September 30, 2013. Our international operations are subject to risks common to foreign operations, such as general economic and market conditions in the countries in which we operate, changes in governmental regulations, political instability, import restrictions, additional scrutiny over certain financial instruments and currency exchange rate risks. We cannot assure you that shifts in currency exchange rates, especially significant strengthening of the U.S. dollar compared to the Euro and Swiss Franc, will not have a material adverse effect on our operating results and financial condition.
41

We are dependent on government funding and the capital spending programs of our customers, and the effect of healthcare reform on government funding and our customers' ability to purchase our products is uncertain.
Our customers include universities, clinical diagnostics laboratories, government agencies, hospitals and pharmaceutical, biotechnology and chemical companies. The capital spending programs of these institutions and companies have a significant effect on the demand for our products. Such programs are based on a wide variety of factors, including the resources available to make such purchases, the availability of funding from grants by governments or government agencies, the spending priorities for various types of equipment and the policies regarding capital expenditures during industry downturns or recessionary periods. If government funding to our customers were to decrease, or if our customers were to decrease or reallocate their budgets in a manner adverse to us, our business, financial condition or results of operations could be materially adversely affected.
Healthcare reform and the growth of managed care organizations have been and continue to be significant factors in the clinical diagnostics market. The trend towards managed care, together with healthcare reform of the delivery system in the United States and efforts to reform in Europe, has resulted in increased pressure on healthcare providers and other participants in the healthcare industry to reduce costs. Consolidation among healthcare providers has resulted in fewer, more powerful groups, whose purchasing power gives them cost containment leverage. These competitive forces place constraints on the levels of overall pricing, and thus could have a material adverse effect on our gross margins for products we sell in clinical diagnostics markets.
In the United States, 2010 reform measures, in particular, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, as amended by the Health Care and Education Affordability Reconciliation Act, collectively, the PPACA, impose significant new programs and responsibilities affecting U.S. pharmaceutical and medical device industries. The PPACA, among other things, establishes annual fees and taxes on manufacturers of certain medical devices, including our devices, and promotes programs that increase the federal government's comparative effectiveness research, which may be used to evaluate the selection of medical services by clinicians and others. PPACA also mandates a reduction in payments for clinical laboratory services paid under the Medicare Clinical Laboratory Fee Schedule of 1.75% for the years 2011 through 2015. In addition, a productivity adjustment is made to the fee schedule payment amount. These changes in payments apply to some or all of the clinical laboratory test services furnished to Medicare beneficiaries.
In addition, other legislative changes have been proposed and adopted in the United States since the PPACA was enacted. On August 2, 2011, the Budget Control Act of 2011, among other things, created measures for spending reductions by Congress. A Joint Select Committee on Deficit Reduction, tasked with recommending a targeted deficit reduction of at least $1.2 trillion for the years 2013 through 2021, was unable to reach required goals, thereby triggering the legislation's automatic reduction to several government programs. This includes aggregate reductions to Medicare payments to providers of up to 2% per fiscal year, starting in 2013. On January 2, 2013, President Obama signed into law the American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012, or the ATRA, which, among other things, delayed for another two months the budget cuts mandated by these sequestration provisions of the Budget Control Act of 2011. The ATRA also reduced Medicare payments to several providers, including hospitals, imaging centers and cancer treatment centers, and increased the statute of limitations period for the government to recover overpayments to providers from three to five years. To the extent that the healthcare industry seeks to address the need to contain costs stemming from reform measures such as those contained in PPACA and ATRA, or in future legislation, by limiting the number of clinical tests being performed, our results of operations could be materially and adversely affected. If these changes in the healthcare markets in the United States and Europe continue, we could be forced to alter our approach in selling, marketing, distributing and servicing our products.
Our failure to improve our product offerings and develop and introduce new products may negatively impact our business.
Our future success depends on our ability to continue to improve our product offerings and develop and introduce new product lines and extensions that integrate new technological advances. If we are unable to integrate technological advances into our product offerings or to design, develop, manufacture and market new product lines and extensions successfully and in a timely manner, our operating results will be adversely affected. We cannot
42

assure you that our product and process development efforts will be successful or that new products we introduce will achieve market acceptance.
If we experience a disruption of our information technology systems, or if we fail to successfully implement, manage and integrate our information technology and reporting systems, it could harm our business.
Our information technology (IT) systems are an integral part of our business, and a serious disruption of our IT systems could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations. We depend on our IT systems to process orders, manage inventory and collect accounts receivable. Our IT systems also allow us to efficiently purchase products from our suppliers and ship products to our customers on a timely basis, maintain cost-effective operations and provide customer service. We cannot assure you that our contingency plans will allow us to operate at our current level of efficiency.
Our ability to implement our business plan in a rapidly evolving market requires effective planning, reporting and analytical processes. We expect that we will need to continue to improve and further integrate our IT systems, reporting systems and operating procedures by training and educating our employees with respect to these improvements and integrations on an ongoing basis in order to effectively run our business. We are currently in the process of implementing a global single instance Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) platform. If we fail to successfully manage and integrate our IT systems, reporting systems and operating procedures, including the ERP platform, it could adversely affect our business or operating results.
Risks relating to intellectual property rights may negatively impact our business.
We rely on a combination of copyright, trade secret, patent and trademark laws and third-party nondisclosure agreements to protect our intellectual property rights and products. However, we cannot assure you that our intellectual property rights will not be challenged, invalidated, circumvented or rendered unenforceable, or that meaningful protection or adequate remedies will be available to us. For instance, it may be possible for unauthorized third parties to copy our intellectual property, to reverse engineer or obtain and use information that we regard as proprietary, or to develop equivalent technologies independently. Additionally, third parties may assert patent, copyright and other intellectual property rights to technologies that are important to us. If we are unable to license or otherwise access protected technology used in our products, or if we lose our rights under any existing licenses, we could be prohibited from manufacturing and marketing such products. We may find it necessary to enforce our patents or other intellectual property rights or to defend ourselves against claimed infringement of the rights of others through litigation, which could result in substantial costs to us and divert our resources. We also could incur substantial costs to redesign our products, to defend any legal action taken against us or to pay damages to an infringed party. The foregoing matters could adversely impact our business.
We are subject to substantial government regulation, and any changes in regulation or violations of regulations by us, could adversely affect our business, prospects, results of operations or financial condition.
Some of our products (primarily diagnostic products), production processes and marketing are subject to federal, state, local and foreign regulation, including by the FDA and its foreign counterparts. The FDA regulates our diagnostic products as medical devices pursuant to the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act. Unless an exemption applies, each medical device marketed in the United States must first receive either clearance of a 510(k) premarket notification or approval of a premarket approval application (PMA) from the FDA, depending on the risk classification of the device. Medical devices can be marketed only for the indications for which they are cleared or approved. The FDA has also generally exercised its enforcement discretion to not enforce applicable regulations, including premarket requirements, with respect to certain diagnostic products referred to as laboratory developed tests, which are tests developed by a single laboratory for use only in that laboratory. However, the FDA has indicated, since 2010, that it intends to reconsider its policy regarding enforcement and to begin drafting an oversight framework for such tests. After a device receives 510(k) clearance, any modification that could significantly affect its safety or effectiveness, or that would constitute a major change in its intended use, requires a new 510(k) clearance or could require a PMA approval. After a device is placed on the market, regardless of the classification or pre-market pathway, it remains subject to significant regulatory requirements. The FDA has broad
43

regulatory and enforcement powers. If the FDA determines that we have failed to comply with applicable regulatory requirements, it can impose a variety of enforcement actions ranging from public warning letters, fines, injunctions, consent decrees and civil penalties to suspension or delayed issuance of approvals, seizure or recall of our products, total or partial shutdown of production, withdrawal of approvals or clearances already granted, and criminal prosecution. The FDA can also require us to repair, replace or refund the cost of devices that we manufactured or distributed.
In addition, the FDA may change its clearance and approval policies, adopt additional regulations or revise existing regulations, or take other actions, which may prevent or delay approval or clearance of our products or impact our ability to modify our currently approved or cleared products on a timely basis. For example, the FDA recently initiated a review of the pre-market clearance process in response to internal and external concerns regarding the 510(k) program. In January 2011, the FDA announced 25 action items designed to make the process more rigorous and transparent. Some of these proposals, if enacted, could impose additional regulatory requirements upon us, which could delay our ability to obtain new 510(k) clearances, increase the costs of compliance or restrict our ability to maintain our current clearances. Any delay in, or failure to receive or maintain, clearance or approval for our products could prevent us from generating revenue from these products and adversely affect our business operations and financial results. Additionally, the FDA and other regulatory authorities have broad enforcement powers. Regulatory enforcement or inquiries, or other increased scrutiny on us, could affect the perceived safety and efficacy of our products and dissuade our customers from using our products. Many foreign governments have similar rules and regulations regarding the importation sale and use of our products.
We are also subject to government regulation of the use and handling of a number of materials and controlled substances. The U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration establishes registration, security, recordkeeping, reporting, storage, distribution and other requirements for controlled substances pursuant to the Controlled Substances Act of 1970. Failure to comply with present or future laws and regulations could result in substantial liability to us, suspension or cessation of our operations, restrictions on our ability to expand at our present locations or require us to make significant capital expenditures or incur other significant expenses.
We are subject to federal and state healthcare fraud and abuse laws and regulations and could face substantial penalties if we are unable to fully comply with such laws.
We are subject to healthcare fraud and abuse regulation and enforcement by both the federal government and the states and foreign governments in which we conduct our business. These healthcare laws and regulations include, for example:

• | the federal Anti-Kickback Law, which prohibits, among other things, persons or entities from soliciting, receiving, offering or providing remuneration, directly or indirectly, in return for or to induce either the referral of an individual for, or the purchase order or recommendation of, any item or services for which payment may be made under a federal healthcare program such as the Medicare and Medicaid programs;

• | federal false claims laws, which prohibit, among other things, individuals or entities from knowingly presenting, or causing to be presented, claims for payment from Medicare, Medicaid, or other third-party payors that are false or fraudulent, and which may apply to entities like us to the extent that our interactions with customers may affect their billing or coding practices;

• | the federal Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996, or HIPAA, which established new federal crimes for knowingly and willfully executing a scheme to defraud any healthcare benefit program or making false statements in connection with the delivery of or payment for healthcare benefits, items or services; and

• | state law equivalents of each of the above federal laws, such as anti-kickback and false claims laws, which may apply to items or services reimbursed by any third-party payor, including commercial insurers.

If our operations are found to be in violation of any of the laws described above or any other governmental regulations that apply to us, we may be subject to penalties, including civil and criminal penalties, damages, fines, exclusion from the Medicare and Medicaid programs, and the curtailment or restructuring of our operations. Any penalties, damages, fines, exclusions, curtailment or restructuring of our operations could adversely affect our
44

ability to operate our business and our financial results. The risk of our being found in violation of these laws is increased by the fact that many of these laws are broad and their provisions are open to a variety of interpretations. Further, the PPACA amends the intent requirement of the federal anti-kickback and criminal health care fraud statutes. A person or entity no longer needs to have actual knowledge of this statute or specific intent to violate it. In addition, the government may assert that a claim including items or services resulting from a violation of the federal anti-kickback statute constitutes a false or fraudulent claim for purposes of the false claims statutes. Any action against us for violation of these laws, even if we successfully defend against it, could cause us to incur significant legal expenses and divert our management's attention from the operation of our business.
Further, the PPACA includes provisions known as the Physician Payment Sunshine Act, which requires certain manufacturers of drugs, biologics, devices and medical supplies to record any transfers of value to U.S. physicians and U.S. teaching hospitals. Manufacturers must also disclose investment interests held by physicians and their family members. Failure to submit the required information may result in civil monetary penalties of up to $1 million per year for known violations and may result in liability under other federal laws or regulations. Manufacturers have been required to perform data collection since August 1, 2013 and must report such data to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services by March 31, 2014. Several states in the U.S. have also implemented similar reporting requirements, and an increasing number of countries worldwide either have adopted or are considering similar laws requiring transparency of interactions with health care professionals. These laws will impose administrative, cost and compliance burdens on us. If we are found to be in violation of any of these laws and other applicable state and country laws, we may be subject to penalties, including fines.
We are currently subject to environmental regulations and enforcement proceedings.
Our operations are subject to federal, state, local and foreign environmental laws and regulations that govern such activities as transportation of goods, emissions to air and discharges to water, as well as handling and disposal practices for solid, hazardous and medical wastes. In addition to environmental laws that regulate our operations, we are also subject to environmental laws and regulations that create liability and clean-up responsibility for spills, disposals or other releases of hazardous substances into the environment as a result of our operations or otherwise impacting real property that we own or operate. The environmental laws and regulations also subject us to claims by third parties for damages resulting from any spills, disposals or releases resulting from our operations or at any of our properties.
We may in the future incur capital and operating costs to comply with currently existing laws and regulations, and possible new statutory enactments, and these expenditures may be significant. We have incurred, and may in the future incur, fines related to environmental matters and liability for costs or damages related to spills or other releases of hazardous substances into the environment at sites where we have operated, or at off-site locations where we have sent hazardous substances for disposal. We can provide no assurance, however, that such matters or any future obligations to comply with environmental laws and regulations will not have a material impact on our operations or financial condition.
Loss of key personnel could hurt our business.
Our products and services are highly technical in nature. In general, only highly qualified and trained scientists have the necessary skills to develop and market our products and provide our services. In addition, some of our manufacturing positions are highly technical. We face intense competition for these professionals from our competitors, customers, marketing partners and other companies throughout our industry. We generally do not enter into employment agreements requiring these employees to continue in our employment for any period of time. Any failure on our part to hire, train and retain a sufficient number of qualified personnel could substantially damage our business. Additionally, if we were to lose a sufficient number of our research and development scientists and were unable to replace them or satisfy our needs for research and development through outsourcing, it could adversely affect our business.
45

A significant majority of our voting stock is held by the Schwartz family, which could lead to conflicts of interest.
We have two classes of voting stock, Class A Common Stock and Class B Common Stock. With a few exceptions, holders of Class A and Class B Common Stock vote as a single class. When voting as a single class, each share of Class A Common Stock is entitled to one-tenth of a vote, while each share of Class B Common Stock has one vote. In the election or removal of directors, the classes vote separately and the holders of Class A Common Stock are entitled to elect 25% of the Board of Directors, with holders of Class B Common Stock electing the remaining directors.
As of February 15, 2013, the Schwartz family collectively held approximately 15% of our Class A Common Stock and 92% of our Class B Common Stock. As a result, the Schwartz family is able to elect a majority of the directors, effect fundamental changes in our direction and control matters affecting us, including the allocation of business opportunities that may be suitable for our company. In addition, this concentration of ownership and voting power may have the effect of delaying or preventing a change in control of our company.
The Schwartz family may exercise its control over us according to interests that are different from other investors' or debtors' interests.
David Schwartz, our co-founder and former Chairman of the Board, passed away on April 1, 2012; however, we do not expect Mr. Schwartz's death to affect the Schwartz family's majority voting power.
Natural disasters, terrorist attacks or acts of war may cause damage or disruption to us and our employees, facilities, information systems, security systems, vendors and customers, which could significantly impact our net sales, costs and expenses, and financial condition.
We have significant manufacturing and distribution facilities, particularly in the western United States, France and Switzerland. In particular, the western United States has experienced a number of earthquakes, wildfires, floods, landslides and other natural disasters in recent years. The occurrences could damage or destroy our facilities which may result in interruptions to our business and losses that exceed our insurance coverage. Terrorist attacks, such as those that occurred on September 11, 2001, have contributed to economic instability in the United States, and further acts of terrorism, bioterrorism, violence or war could affect the markets in which we operate, our business operations, our expectations and other forward-looking statements contained or incorporated in this document. Any of these events could cause a decrease in our revenue, earnings and cash flows.
We may incur losses in future periods due to write-downs in the value of financial instruments.
We have positions in a variety of financial instruments including asset backed securities and other similar instruments. Financial markets are quite volatile and the markets for these securities can be illiquid. The value of these securities will continue to be impacted by external market factors including default rates, changes in the value of the underlying property, such as residential or commercial real estate, rating agency actions, the prices at which observable market transactions occur and the financial strength of various entities, such as financial guarantors who provide insurance for the securities. Should we need to convert these positions to cash, we may not be able to sell these instruments without significant losses due to current debtor financial conditions or other market considerations.
We have substantial debt and have the ability to incur additional debt. The principal and interest payment obligations of such debt may restrict our future operations and impair our ability to meet our obligations under our notes.
As of September 30, 2013 we and our subsidiaries have approximately $437.2 million of outstanding indebtedness.
The following chart shows certain important credit statistics.
46

| At September 30, 2013
| (dollars in millions)
Total debt | $ | 437.2 |
Bio-Rad’s stockholders’ equity | $ | 2,124.2 |
Debt to equity ratio | 0.2 |

Our incurrence of substantial amounts of debt may have important consequences. For instance, it could:

• | make it more difficult for us to satisfy our financial obligations, including those relating to our outstanding notes;

• | require us to dedicate a substantial portion of our cash flow from operations to the payment of interest and principal due under our debt, including our outstanding notes, which will reduce funds available for other business purposes;

• | increase our vulnerability to general adverse economic and industry conditions;

• | limit our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in our business and the industries in which we operate;

• | place us at a competitive disadvantage compared with some of our competitors that have less debt; and

• | limit our ability to obtain additional financing required to fund working capital and capital expenditures and for other general corporate purposes.

Our ability to satisfy our obligations and to reduce our total debt depends on our future operating performance and on economic, financial, competitive and other factors, many of which are beyond our control. Our business may not generate sufficient cash flow, and future financings may not be available to provide sufficient net proceeds, to meet these obligations or to successfully execute our business strategy.
Our existing credit facility and the terms of our other debt instruments, including agreements we may enter in the future, contain or will contain covenants imposing significant restrictions on our business. These restrictions may affect our ability to operate our business and may limit our ability to take advantage of potential business opportunities as they arise. These covenants place restrictions on our ability to, among other things:

• | incur additional debt;

• | acquire other businesses or assets through merger or purchase;

• | create liens;

• | make investments;

• | enter into transactions with affiliates;

• | sell assets;

• | in the case of some of our subsidiaries, guarantee debt; and

• | declare or pay dividends, redeem stock or make other distributions to stockholders.

Our existing credit facility also requires that we meet certain financial tests and maintain certain financial ratios, including a maximum consolidated leverage ratio test, minimum consolidated interest coverage ratio test and a minimum net worth test.
Our ability to comply with these covenants may be affected by events beyond our control, including prevailing economic, financial and industry conditions. The breach of any of these restrictions could result in a default. An event of default under our debt agreements would permit some of our lenders to declare all amounts borrowed from them to be due and payable, together with accrued and unpaid interest. If we were unable to repay debt to our senior secured lenders, these lenders could proceed against the collateral securing that debt. The collateral is substantially all of our personal property assets, the assets of our domestic subsidiaries and 65% of the capital stock of certain of our foreign subsidiaries. In addition, acceleration of our other indebtedness may cause us to be unable to make interest payments on our outstanding notes and repay the principal amount of our outstanding notes or may cause the future subsidiary guarantors, if any, to be unable to make payments under the guarantees.
47

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
None.
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
None.
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures
Not applicable.
Item 5. Other Information
None.
Item 6. Exhibits
(a) Exhibits
The following documents are filed as part of this report:

Exhibit No. |
31.1 | Chief Executive Officer Section 302 Certification
31.2 | Chief Financial Officer Section 302 Certification
32.1 | Chief Executive Officer Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.2 | Chief Financial Officer Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
101 | The following materials from this report, formatted in XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language): (i) the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets, (ii) the unaudited interim Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations, (iii) the unaudited interim Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income, (iv) the unaudited interim Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, and (v) Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

48

SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereto duly authorized.

BIO-RAD LABORATORIES, INC.
(Registrant)
Date: | November 12, 2013 |  | /s/ Norman Schwartz
|  |  | Norman Schwartz, Chairman of the Board,
|  |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
Date: | November 12, 2013 |  | /s/ Christine A. Tsingos
|  |  | Christine A. Tsingos, Executive Vice President,
|  |  | Chief Financial Officer

49