XML 50 R8.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT
v2.4.0.6

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies | 12 Months Ended
--- | ---
Dec. 31, 2012
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies |
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies | Note 2—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies Basis of presentation—The accompanying consolidated financial statements were prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”) and the financial statement rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). References for Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) standards are made to the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”). Reclassifications have been made to prior year financial statement presentation to conform to the current year presentation. Principles of consolidation—The accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. Use of estimates—The preparation of the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities as of the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results could materially differ from those estimates. Significant estimates are made for costs to complete construction projects which have a direct effect on gross profit as reported in these consolidated financial statements. Operating cycle— In the accompanying consolidated balance sheets, assets and liabilities relating to long-term construction contracts are included as current assets and current liabilities, since they are expected to be realized or liquidated in the normal course of contract completion, although completion may require more than one calendar year. Cash and cash equivalents—The Company considers all highly liquid investments with an original maturity of three months or less when purchased as cash equivalents. Short term investments—The Company classifies as short term investments all securities or other assets acquired which have ready marketability and can be liquidated, if necessary, within the current operating cycle and which have readily determinable fair values. Short term investments are classified as available for sale and are recorded at fair value using the specific identification method. Currently, the majority of the Company’s short-term investments are in short-term dollar-denominated bank deposits and other four to six month certificates of deposits (“CDs”) through the CDARS (Certificate of Deposit Account Registry Service) process and Treasury Bills in order to provide FDIC backing of the investments. Customer retention deposits—Customer retention deposits consist of contract retention payments made by customers into escrow cash accounts with a bank. Investments for these amounts are limited to highly graded U.S. and municipal government debt obligations, investment grade commercial paper and CDs, which limits credit risk on these balances. Escrow cash accounts are released to the Company by customers as projects are completed in accordance with contract terms. Inventory and uninstalled contract materials—Inventory consists of expendable construction materials and small tools that will be used in construction projects and is valued at the lower of cost, using first-in, first-out method, or market. Uninstalled contract materials include certain job specific materials not yet installed which are valued using the specific identification method. Business combinations—Business combinations are accounted for using the acquisition method of accounting. Expenses incurred in connection with a business combination are expensed as incurred. Changes in deferred tax asset valuation allowances and acquired tax uncertainties after the measurement period are recognized in net income. Goodwill and other intangible assets—The Company accounts for goodwill and other indefinite-lived intangible assets in accordance with ASC Topic 350 “Intangibles — Goodwill and Other”. Under ASC Topic 350, goodwill and certain indefinite-lived intangible assets are not amortized but are subject to an annual impairment test as of the first day of the fourth quarter of each year, with more frequent testing if indicators of potential impairment exist. The impairment review is performed at the reporting unit level for those units with recorded goodwill. During the fourth quarter of 2010, the Company determined that the recorded value of the Cravens acquisition intangible assets and goodwill was impaired and recorded an impairment charge of $1,700. There were no other impairments of goodwill or intangible assets during the periods presented. At December 31, 2012, goodwill is recorded at our reporting units as follows: · James Construction Group, East Construction Services segment, $59,259; · Rockford, West Construction Services segment, $32,079; · Q3C Contracting, Inc., West Construction Services segment, $12,562; · Sprint (a subsidiary of PES), East Construction Services segment, $9,389; · Born Canada, Engineering segment, $2,441; · The Saxon Group (a subsidiary of PES), East Construction Services segment, $810; and · Cardinal Contractors, East Construction Services segment, $401. In September 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-08, Intangibles — Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Testing Goodwill or Impairment (“ASU 2011-08”). ASU 2011-08 provides an option to assess qualitative factors to determine whether the existence of events or circumstances leads to a determination that it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount. If an entity determines that the fair value is not less than its carrying amount, then it is not necessary to perform the two-step impairment test. An entity can choose to perform the qualitative assessment on none, some or all of its reporting units. An entity can also bypass the qualitative assessment for any reporting unit in any period and proceed directly to step one of the impairment test, and then resume performing the qualitative assessment in any subsequent period. ASU 2011-08 also includes new qualitative indicators that replace those currently used to determine whether an interim goodwill impairment test is required to be performed. On January 1, 2012, the Company adopted this standard which did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows. In July 2012, the FASB issued ASU 2012-02, Intangibles — Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Testing Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets for Impairment (“ASU 2012-02”). ASU 2012-02 allows an organization the option of first assessing qualitative factors to determine if a quantitative impairment test of the indefinite-lived intangible asset is necessary. If the qualitative assessment reveals that it is “more likely than not” that the asset is impaired, a calculation of the asset’s fair value is required. Otherwise, no quantitative calculation, as outlined in Subtopic 350-30 is necessary. The Company adopted this standard on October 1, 2012, the date of the Company’s impairment review. The adoption of ASU 2012-02 did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows. Income tax— Current income tax expense is the amount of income taxes expected to be payable for the current year. A deferred income tax liability or asset is established for the expected future tax consequences resulting from the differences in financial reporting and tax basis of assets and liabilities between GAAP and the tax codes. A valuation allowance is provided if it is more likely than not that some or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. In addition to valuation allowances, the Company provides for uncertain tax positions when such tax positions do not meet the recognition thresholds or measurement standards as set forth in ASC Topic 740 regarding accounting for uncertainty in income taxes. Amounts for uncertain tax positions are adjusted in periods when new information becomes available or when positions are effectively settled. The Company recognizes accrued interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions, if any, as a component of income tax expense. Comprehensive income—The Company accounts for comprehensive income in accordance with ASC Topic 220 “Comprehensive Income”, which specifies the computation, presentation and disclosure requirements for comprehensive income (loss). During the reported periods herein, such amounts were not significant. General matters—The Company has significant working capital invested in assets that may have a liquidation period extending beyond one year. The Company has claims receivable and retention due from various customers and others that are currently in dispute, the realization of which is subject to binding arbitration, final negotiation or litigation. Although management believes that it will be successful in collecting these amounts, the amounts ultimately collected upon final resolution of these matters may materially differ from the carrying value currently presented in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet. Foreign operations—At December 31, 2012, the Company had operations in Canada with assets aggregating approximately $10,335, compared to $9,385 at December 31, 2011. Functional currencies and foreign currency translation—Through a subsidiary, the Company maintains foreign operations in Canada. The Company uses the United States dollar as its functional currency in Canada, as substantially all monetary transactions are made in dollars, and other significant economic facts and circumstances currently support that position. As these factors may change, the Company periodically assesses its position with respect to the functional currency of its foreign subsidiary. Included in other income are foreign exchange losses of $36 in 2012, losses of $96 in 2011 and gains of $250 in 2010. Partnerships and joint ventures — As is normal in the construction industry, the Company is periodically a member of a partnership or a joint venture. These partnerships or joint ventures are used primarily for the execution of single contracts or projects. The Company’s ownership can vary from a small noncontrolling ownership to a significant ownership interest. The Company evaluates each partnership or joint venture to determine whether the entity is considered a variable interest entity (“VIE”) as defined in FASB ASC Topic 810, and if a VIE, whether the Company is the primary beneficiary of the VIE, which would require the Company to consolidate the VIE with the Company’s financial statements. When consolidation occurs, the Company accounts for the interests of the other parties as a noncontrolling interest and discloses the net income attributable to noncontrolling interests. At December 31, 2012, the Company consolidated the financial results of one VIE, Blythe Power Constructors (“Blythe”), a joint venture formed for the installation of a parabolic trough solar field and steam generation system in California. For Blythe, net income attributable to the Company and the net income attributable to the noncontrolling interest owners are presented on the Consolidated Statement of Earnings. Other financial information is presented in Note 13 - Noncontrolling Interests. Equity method accounting— If the Company is not the primary beneficiary of a VIE or does not have a controlling interest, the Company accounts for its noncontrolling interest using the equity method of accounting per ASC Topic 323. Such entity is recorded at cost and the carrying amount is adjusted periodically to recognize the Company’s proportionate share of income or loss, additional contributions made and dividends and capital distributions received. The Company also recognizes its share of any impairment charge recorded by the investee. The Company will consider the effect of an other than temporary decrease in the value of the investment if there is a basis difference in the assets of the investee. In the event a partially owned equity affiliate were to incur a loss and the Company’s cumulative proportionate share of the loss exceeded the carrying amount of the equity method investment, application of the equity method would be suspended and the Company’s proportionate share of further losses would not be recognized unless the Company committed to provide further financial support to the affiliate. The Company would resume application of the equity method once the affiliate became profitable and the Company’s proportionate share of the affiliate’s earnings equals the Company’s cumulative proportionate share of losses that were not recognized during the period the application of the equity method was suspended. In December 2011, the Company recognized its proportionate share of an impairment charge taken by the WesPac Energy LLC equity investment and recorded a basis adjustment in the investment. See Note 8 — “Equity Method Investments”. Cash concentration—The Company places its cash in short term U.S. Treasury bonds, in CDs and with several other financial institutions. As of December 31, 2012 and 2011, the Company had cash balances of $157.6 million and $120.3 million, respectively. At December 31, 2012, the $157.6 million consisted of $4.6 million held in Treasury bill funds and $153.0 million with various financial institutions that are backed by the federal government FDIC program. At December 31, 2011, the $120.3 million of cash consisted of $28.0 million held in short-term CDARS, $4.6 million in Treasury bill funds and $87.7 million was held with various financial institutions that are backed by the federal government FDIC program. Collective bargaining agreements—Approximately 37% of the Company’s hourly employees, primarily consisting of field laborers, were covered by collective bargaining agreements. Upon renegotiation of such agreements, the Company could be exposed to increases in hourly costs and work stoppages. Of the 72 collective bargaining agreements to which the Company is a party to, nineteen will require renegotiation during 2013. Multiemployer plans —The Company participates and contributes to a number of multiemployer benefit plans for its union employees at rates determined by the various collective bargaining agreements. Each plan’s trustees determine the eligibility and allocations of contributions and benefit amounts, determine the types of benefits and administer the plan. If the Company were to withdraw from a plan, the multiemployer benefit plan requires satisfaction of a withdrawal obligation. Any potential withdrawal obligation may be material. Any withdrawal liability would be recorded when it is probable that a liability exists and can be reasonably estimated, in accordance with GAAP. In November 2011, the Company withdrew from the Central States Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Fund multiemployer pension plan and recorded a $5 million withdrawal liability as of December 31, 2011. In 2012, the Company increased the estimated withdrawal liability balance to $7.5 million, recording an expense of $2.5 million. At this time, the Company has no plans to withdraw from any other agreements. See Note 17 — Multiemployer Plans Worker’s compensation insurance—The Company self-insures worker’s compensation claims to a certain level. The Company maintained a self-insurance reserve totaling $16,547 and $13,809 at December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively. The amount is included in “accrued expenses and other current liabilities” on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. Claims administration expenses are charged to current operations as incurred. Future actual payments may materially differ from these reserves. Fair value of financial instruments—The consolidated financial statements include financial instruments for which the fair value may differ from amounts reflected on a historical basis. Financial instruments of the Company consist of cash, accounts receivable, short-term investments, accounts payable and certain accrued liabilities. These financial instruments generally approximate fair market value based on the short-term nature of these instruments. The carrying value of the Company’s long-term debt approximates fair value based on comparison with current prevailing market rates for loans of similar risks and maturities. In May 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-04, Fair Value Measurement: Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRS, which provides amendments to FASB ASC Topic 820, Fair Value Measurement. The objective of ASU 2011-04 is to create common fair value measurement and disclosure requirements between GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”). The amendments clarify existing fair value measurement and disclosure requirements and make changes to particular principles or requirements for measuring or disclosing information about fair value measurements. On January 1, 2012, the Company adopted ASU 2011-04 which did not have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements. Accounts receivable—Contract receivables are primarily concentrated from public and private companies and governmental agencies located throughout the United States and Canada. Credit terms for payment of products and services are extended to customers in the normal course of business and no interest is charged. Contract receivables are generally progress billings on projects, and as a result, are short term in nature. The Company requires no collateral from its customers, but follows the practice of filing statutory liens or stop notices on all construction projects when collection problems are anticipated. The Company uses the allowance method of accounting for losses from uncollectible accounts. Under this method an allowance is provided based upon historical experience and management’s evaluation of outstanding contract receivables at the end of each year. Receivables are written off in the period deemed uncollectible. The allowance for doubtful accounts at December 31, 2012 and 2011 was $432 and $363, respectively. Revenue recognition—Historically, substantial portions of the Company’s revenues have been generated under fixed-price contracts. Fixed-price contracts carry certain inherent risks, including underestimation of costs, problems with new technologies and economic and other changes that may occur over the contract period. The Company recognizes revenues using the percentage-of-completion method for fixed-price contracts, which may result in uneven and irregular results. Unforeseen events and circumstances can alter the estimate of the costs and potential profit associated with a particular contract. Total estimated costs, and thus contract revenues and income, can be impacted by changes in any of the following: productivity, scheduling, the unit cost of labor, subcontracts, materials and equipment. Additionally, external factors such as weather, client needs, client delays in providing permits and approvals, labor availability, governmental regulation and politics may affect the progress of a project’s completion and thus the timing of revenue recognition. To the extent that original cost estimates are modified, estimated costs to complete increase, delivery schedules are delayed, or progress under a contract is otherwise impeded, cash flow, revenue recognition and profitability from a particular contract may be adversely affected. In the percentage-of-completion method, estimated revenues and resulting contract income is calculated based on the total costs incurred to date as a percentage of total estimated costs. If an estimate of total contract cost indicates a loss on a contract, the projected loss is recognized in full at the time of the estimate. The full loss amount is recognized as an “accrued loss provision” on the balance sheet. As the percentage-of-completion method is used to calculate revenues, the accrued loss provision is changed so that the gross profit for the contract is zero. Other contract forms—In addition, t he Company also uses unit-price, time and material, and cost reimbursable plus fee contracts. For these jobs, revenue is recognized based on contractual terms. For example, time and material contract revenues are recognized based on purchasing and employee time records. Similarly, unit price contracts recognize revenue based on accomplishment of specific units at a specified unit price. For all of its contracts, the Company includes the provision for estimated losses on uncompleted contracts in accrued expenses. The provision for estimated losses on uncompleted contracts was $764 and $917 for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively. Changes in job performance, job conditions and estimated profitability, including those arising from final contract settlements, may result in revisions to costs and income. These revisions are recognized in the period in which the revisions are determined. Claims are included in revenues when realization is probable and amounts can be reliably determined. Revenues in excess of contract costs incurred on claims are recognized only when the amounts have been paid. The caption “Costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings” represents unbilled receivables which arise when revenues have been recorded but the amount cannot be billed under the terms of the contract until a later date. Balances may represent: (a) unbilled amounts arising from the use of the percentage-of-completion method of accounting, (b) incurred costs to be billed under cost reimbursement type contracts, or (c) amounts arising from routine lags in billing. For those contracts in which billings exceed contract revenues recognized to date, excesses are included in the caption “Billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings”. The Company considers unapproved change orders to be contract variations for which Primoris has customer approval for a scope change but a price change associated with the scope change has not yet been agreed upon. Costs associated with unapproved change orders are included in the estimated cost to complete the contracts and are treated as project costs as incurred. The Company recognizes revenue equal to costs incurred on unapproved change orders when realization of price approval is probable and the estimated revenue amount is equal to or greater than the costs related to the unapproved change order. Unapproved change orders involve the use of estimates, and it is reasonably possible that revisions to the estimated costs and recoverable amounts may be required in future reporting periods to reflect changes in estimates or final agreements with customers. The Company considers claims to be amounts Primoris seeks, or will seek, to collect from customers or others for customer-caused changes in contract specifications or design, or other customer-related causes of unanticipated additional contract costs on which there is no agreement with customers on both scope and price changes. Revenue from claims is recognized when agreement is reached with customers as to the value of the claims, which in some instances may not occur until after completion of work under the contract. Costs associated with claims are included in the estimated costs to complete the contracts and are treated as project costs when incurred. In accordance with applicable terms of construction contracts, certain retainage amounts may be withheld by customers until completion and acceptance of the project. Final payments of the majority of retainage may not be made until the following operating cycle. Significant revisions in contract estimates—As previously discussed, revenue recognition is based on the percentage-of-completion method for firm fixed-price contracts. Under this method, the costs incurred to date as a percentage of total estimated costs are used to calculate the revenue to be recognized. Total estimated costs, and thus contract income, are impacted by many factors. For projects that are in process in the prior year, but are either completed or continue to be in process during the current year, there can be a difference in revenues and profits related to the prior year, had current year estimates of costs to complete been known in the prior year. During the year ended December 31, 2012, certain contracts had revisions in estimates from those projected in 2011. If the revised estimates as of December 31, 2012 had been applied in the prior year, the gross profit earned on these contracts would have resulted in an increase of approximately $8,185 in gross profit in 2011, or approximately $0.10 per diluted share. Similarly, the revised estimates as of December 31, 2011 had been applied in the prior year; the gross profit earned on these contracts would have resulted in an increase of approximately $10,244 in 2010, or approximately $0.12 per diluted share. In addition, the revised estimates for the year ended December 31, 2010 would have resulted in a gross profit increase of approximately $9,892 in the year 2009, or approximately $0.13 per diluted share. Customer concentration — The Company operates in multiple industry segments encompassing the construction of commercial, industrial and public works infrastructure assets throughout primarily the United States. Typically, the top ten customers in any one calendar year generate revenues in excess of 50% of total revenues; however in most years a different group make up the top ten customers. For the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, revenues generated by the top ten customers were $862.3 million and $1,000 million, respectively, which represented 55.9% and 68.5%, respectively, of total revenues during the periods. During the years ending December 31, 2012 and 2011, the Louisiana DOT represented 11.1% and 16.4%, respectively, of total revenues and a large gas and electric utility represented 14.6% and 11.3%, respectively, of total revenues. During the year ending December 31, 2012 and 2011, revenues generated by Rockford under the Ruby contract were $12.6 million and $274.9 million, respectively, which represented 0.8% and 18.8%, respectively, of total revenues during the periods. The Ruby contract was part of a large project for the construction of a natural gas pipeline from Wyoming to Oregon for which field work was substantially completed in 2011. At December 31, 2012, approximately 10.0% of the Company’s accounts receivable were due from one customer, and that customer provided 14.6% of the Company’s revenues during 2012. At December 31, 2011, approximately 15.5% of the Company’s accounts receivable were due from one customer, and that customer provided 11.3% of the Company’s revenues during 2011. Property and equipment—Property and equipment are recorded at cost and are depreciated using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the related assets, usually ranging from three to thirty years. Maintenance and repairs are charged to expense as incurred. Significant renewals and betterments are capitalized. At the time of retirement or other disposition of property and equipment, the cost and accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts and any resulting gain or loss is reflected in operations. The Company assesses the recoverability of property and equipment by determining whether the depreciation of property and equipment over its remaining life can be recovered through projected undiscounted future cash flows. The amount of property and equipment impairment if any, is measured based on fair value and is charged to operations in the period in which property and equipment impairment is determined by management. As of December 31, 2012 and 2011, the Company’s management has not identified any material impairment of its property and equipment. Taxes collected from customers—Taxes collected from the Company’s customers are recorded on a net basis. Share-based payments and stock-based compensation—In July 2008, the shareholders approved and the Company adopted the Primoris Services Corporation 2008 Long-term Incentive Equity Plan (“2008 Equity Plan”). Under the terms of the 2008 Equity Plan, the Company issued 111,790 shares of stock in 2012 and 94,966 shares of stock in 2011, purchased by our employees who are participants in the Primoris Long-term Retention Plan. The shares have a six-month restriction on any trades. As part of the quarterly compensation of the non-employee members of the Board of Directors, the Company issued 27,675 shares of common stock during 2012 and 14,825 shares of common stock during 2011 under the 2008 Equity Plan. The shares were fully vested and have a one-year restriction on any trades. As of December 31, 2012, there were 1,270,744 shares of common stock reserved to provide for the grant and exercise of all future stock option issuances, stock appreciation rights (“SARS”) and grants of restricted shares under the 2008 Equity Plan. Under guidance of ASC Topic 718 “Compensation — Stock Compensation”, stock-based compensation cost is measured at the date of grant, based on the calculated fair value of the stock-based award, and is recognized as expense over the employee’s requisite service period (generally the vesting period of the award). Contingent Earnout Liabilities—As part of recent acquisitions, the Company has agreed to issue additional shares of common stock, or makes payments of cash, to the sellers upon meeting certain operating performance targets for certain periods subsequent to the acquisition date. Each period, the Company evaluates the fair value of the estimated contingency and records a non-operating charge for the change in the fair value. Upon meeting the target, the Company reflects the full liability on the balance sheet and records as a charge to selling, general and administration expense for the change in the fair value of the liability from the prior period. The liability will be settled by issuing the agreed upon values of stock or amount of cash to be paid, as determined by the purchase agreement. In March 2011, the Company issued 1,095,646 shares of common stock to the sellers of JCG after achieving a specific operating performance target for 2010. The Rockford 2011 earnout target was achieved in 2011 and the Company reflected the liability on the balance sheet at December 31, 2011. The liability was settled by issuing 232,637 shares of common stock to the sellers and making a cash payment of $3.45 million in April 2012. The Rockford 2012 earnout target was achieved in 2012 and the Company reflected the liability on the balance sheet at December 31, 2012. The liability will be settled by making a cash payment of $6.9 million in March 2013. As part of the Sprint acquisition in March 2012, the Company agreed to issue additional cash to the sellers upon meeting certain operating performance targets for 2012 and 2013. The Sprint 2012 earnout target was achieved in 2012 and a $4.0 million liability was recorded on the balance sheet at December 31, 2012. The liability will be settled by making a cash payment in March 2013. Derivative instruments and hedging activities—From time to time, the Company utilizes foreign currency hedge agreements to manage its Canadian currency exchange exposures, which are accounted for in accordance with ASC Topic 815 “Derivatives and Hedging”. During the twelve months ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, the Company had no derivative financial instruments. Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements Fair Value Disclosures In May 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued ASU No. 2011-04, Fair Value Measurement: Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRS, which provides amendments to FASB ASC Topic 820, Fair Value Measurement. The objective of ASU 2011-04 is to create common fair value measurement and disclosure requirements between GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”). The amendments clarify existing fair value measurement and disclosure requirements and make changes to particular principles or requirements for measuring or disclosing information about fair value measurements. On January 1, 2012, the Company adopted ASU 2011-04, which did not have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements. Goodwill Impairment Testing In September 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-08, Intangibles — Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Testing Goodwill or Impairment (“ASU 2011-08”). ASU 2011-08 provides an option to assess qualitative factors to determine whether the existence of events or circumstances leads to a determination that it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount. If an entity determines that the fair value is not less than its carrying amount, then it is not necessary to perform the two-step impairment test. An entity can choose to perform the qualitative assessment on none, some or all of its reporting units. An entity can also bypass the qualitative assessment for any reporting unit in any period and proceed directly to step one of the impairment test, and then resume performing the qualitative assessment in any subsequent period. ASU 2011-08 also includes new qualitative indicators that replace those currently used to determine whether an interim goodwill impairment test is required to be performed. On January 1, 2012, the Company adopted this standard which did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows. Intangible Asset Impairment Testing In July 2012, the FASB issued ASU 2012-02, Intangibles — Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Testing Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets for Impairment (“ASU 2012-02”). ASU 2012-02 allows an organization the option of first assessing qualitative factors to determine if a quantitative impairment test of the indefinite-lived intangible asset is necessary. If the qualitative assessment reveals that it is “more likely than not” that the asset is impaired, a calculation of the asset’s fair value is required. Otherwise, no quantitative calculation, as outlined in Subtopic 350-30 is necessary. ASU 2012-02 is effective for annual and interim impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after September 15, 2012. The Company adopted this standard on October 1, 2012, the date of the Company’s annual impairment review. The adoption of ASU 2012-02 did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

X
- Details
Name: | us-gaap_AccountingPoliciesAbstract
Namespace Prefix: | us-gaap_
Data Type: | xbrli:stringItemType
Balance Type: | na
Period Type: | duration

X
- Definition The entire disclosure for all significant accounting policies of the reporting entity. + References Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 235 -SubTopic 10 -Section 50 -Paragraph 6 -URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6367646&loc=d3e18861-107790 Reference 2: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 235 -SubTopic 10 -Section 50 -Paragraph 2 -URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6367646&loc=d3e18743-107790 Reference 3: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 235 -SubTopic 10 -Section 50 -Paragraph 3 -URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6367646&loc=d3e18780-107790 Reference 4: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 235 -SubTopic 10 -Section 50 -Paragraph 5 -URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6367646&loc=d3e18854-107790 Reference 5: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 235 -SubTopic 10 -Section 50 -Paragraph 1 -URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6367646&loc=d3e18726-107790 Reference 6: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher AICPA -Name Accounting Principles Board Opinion (APB) -Number 22 -Paragraph 8 -LegacyDoc This reference is SUPERSEDED by the Accounting Standards Codification effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. This reference is included to help users transition from the previous accounting hierarchy and will be removed from future versions of this taxonomy. + Details
Name: | us-gaap_SignificantAccountingPoliciesTextBlock
Namespace Prefix: | us-gaap_
Data Type: | nonnum:textBlockItemType
Balance Type: | na
Period Type: | duration