XML 33 R19.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT
v3.10.0.1

Commitments and Contingencies | 12 Months Ended
--- | ---
Dec. 31, 2018
Commitments and Contingencies. |
Commitments and Contingencies | Note 12—Commitments and Contingencies Leases—We lease certain property and equipment under non-cancelable operating leases, which expire at various dates through 2024. The leases require us to pay all taxes, insurance, maintenance, and utilities and are classified as operating leases in accordance with ASC 840 “Leases”. The future minimum lease payments required under non-cancelable operating leases are as follows (in thousands):
|  | Total |
For the Years Ending December 31, |  | Commitments |
2019 |  | $ | 56,693 |
2020 |  |  | 41,733 |
2021 |  |  | 26,607 |
2022 |  |  | 12,753 |
2023 |  |  | 6,530 |
Thereafter |  |  | 8,229 |
|  | $ | 152,545 |
Total lease expense during the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016 was $53.4 million, $25.5 and $22.5 million, respectively. Withdrawal liability for multiemployer pension plan— In November 2011, members of the Pipe Line Contractors Association “PLCA” including ARB, Rockford and Q3C (prior to our acquisition in 2012), withdrew from the Central States Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Fund multiemployer pension plan (“Plan”). These withdrawals were made in order to mitigate additional liability in connection with the significantly underfunded Plan. We recorded a withdrawal liability of $7.5 million, which was increased to $7.6 million after the acquisition of Q3C. During the first quarter of 2016, we received a final payment schedule. As a result of payments made and based on this schedule, the liability recorded at December 31, 2017 was $4.7 million. We paid the remaining liability balance during 2018, and have no plans to withdraw from any other labor agreements. NTTA settlement—On February 7, 2012, we were sued in an action entitled North Texas Tollway Authority (“NTTA”), Plaintiff v. James Construction Group, LLC, and KBR, Inc., Defendants, v. Reinforced Earth Company, Third-Party Defendant (the “Lawsuit”). On February 25, 2015 the Lawsuit was settled, and we recorded a liability for $17.0 million. A second defendant agreed to provide up to $5.4 million to pay for the total expected remediation cost of approximately $22.4 million. We will use our settlement obligation to pay for a third-party contractor approved by the NTTA. In the event that the total remediation costs exceed the $22.4 million, the second defendant would pay 20% of the excess amount and we would pay for 80% of the excess amount. During 2018, we increased our forecasted remediation costs based on bids received by the NTTA from third-party contractors, and increased our liability by $3.8 million. As of December 31, 2018, we have spent $4.2 million for remediation. While we continue to monitor the progress toward remediation and the total remediation costs, at this time we cannot determine the eventual remediation cost. At December 31, 2018, our remaining accrual balance was $18.5 million. Litigation—We had been engaged in dispute resolution to collect money we believe we are owed for a construction project completed in 2014. Because of uncertainties associated with the project, including uncertainty of the amounts that would be collected, we used a zero profit margin approach to recording revenue during the construction period for the project. For the project, a cost reimbursable contract, we had a receivable of $32.9 million with a reserve of approximately $17.9 million included in “Contract liabilities” at December 31, 2017 The dispute resolution for the receivable initially required international arbitration; however, in the first half of 2016, the owner sought bankruptcy protection in U.S. bankruptcy court. We initiated litigation against the sureties who had provided lien and stop payment release bonds for the total amount owed. During 2018, we settled with the sureties and collected the $32.9 million receivable, which resulted in recognizing revenue of approximately $18.1 million and gross profit of approximately $17.4 million. We had been engaged in dispute resolution to collect money we believed was owed to us for another construction project completed in 2014. During 2016, we settled the dispute with an exchange of general releases and receipt of $38.0 million in cash, which resulted in recognizing revenue of approximately $27.5 million and gross profit of approximately $26.7 million in the third quarter of 2016. We are subject to other claims and legal proceedings arising out of our business. We provide for costs related to contingencies when a loss from such claims is probable and the amount is reasonably estimable. In determining whether it is possible to provide an estimate of loss, or range of possible loss, we review and evaluate our litigation and regulatory matters on a quarterly basis in light of potentially relevant factual and legal developments. If we determine an unfavorable outcome is not probable or reasonably estimable, we do not accrue for a potential litigation loss. Management is unable to ascertain the ultimate outcome of other claims and legal proceedings; however, after review and consultation with counsel and taking into consideration relevant insurance coverage and related deductibles/self-insurance retention, management believes that it has meritorious defense to the claims and believes that the reasonably possible outcome of such claims will not, individually or in the aggregate, have a materially adverse effect on our consolidated results of operations, financial condition or cash flow. SEC Inquiry— During the fourth quarter of 2014, the staff of the SEC began inquiring about certain contract revenue recognition practices of the Company during 2013 and 2014. Since that time, we cooperated and responded to the staff’s inquiries in connection with this matter. We settled this matter and the inquiry was closed during the third quarter of 2018. Litigation matters from the acquisition of Willbros — In the fourth quarter of 2014, Willbros announced a restatement of its Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for the March 2014 and June 2014 quarters. Shareholder derivative lawsuits were filed and shareholder demands were made purportedly on behalf of Willbros in connection with the restatement. All such lawsuits and demands have been resolved either through voluntary dismissal by the plaintiffs, or through settlement funded by Willbros’ insurance carriers. Bonding—As of December 31, 2018 and 2017, we had bid and completion bonds issued and outstanding totaling approximately $554.9 million and $705.7 million, respectively.

X
- References No definition available. + Details
Name: | us-gaap_CommitmentsAndContingenciesDisclosureAbstract
Namespace Prefix: | us-gaap_
Data Type: | xbrli:stringItemType
Balance Type: | na
Period Type: | duration

X
- Definition The entire disclosure for commitments and contingencies. + References Reference 1: http://fasb.org/us-gaap/role/ref/legacyRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 450 -URI http://asc.fasb.org/topic&trid=2127136 Reference 2: http://fasb.org/us-gaap/role/ref/legacyRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 440 -URI http://asc.fasb.org/topic&trid=2144648 + Details
Name: | us-gaap_CommitmentsAndContingenciesDisclosureTextBlock
Namespace Prefix: | us-gaap_
Data Type: | nonnum:textBlockItemType
Balance Type: | na
Period Type: | duration