10-Q 1 kmx-20140831x10q.htm 10-Q

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

[ X ] QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF

THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the Quarterly Period Ended August 31, 2014

OR

[ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF

THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Commission File Number: 1-31420

CARMAX, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

VIRGINIA | 54-1821055
(State or other jurisdiction of | (I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization) | Identification No.)

12800 TUCKAHOE CREEK PARKWAY, RICHMOND, VIRGINIA | 23238
(Address of principal executive offices) | (Zip Code)

(804) 747-0422

(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)

N/A

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes☒ | No☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

Yes☒ | No☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See definition of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

.

Large accelerated filer☒ | Accelerated filer☐
Non-accelerated filer☐ | Smaller reporting company☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).

Yes☐ | No☒

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.

Class Outstanding as of September 30, 2014

Common Stock, par value $0.50 |  | 215,394,9 66

Page 1

CARMAX, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

TABLE OF CONTENTS

| Page No.
PART I. | FINANCIAL INFORMATION |
| Item 1. | Financial Statements: |
|  | Consolidated Statements of Earnings – |
|  | Three Months and Six Months Ended August 31, 2014 and 2013 | 3
|  | Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income – |
|  | Three Months and Six Months Ended August 31, 2014 and 2013 | 4
|  | Consolidated Balance Sheets – |
|  | August 31, 2014 and February 28, 2014 | 5
|  | Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows – |
|  | Six Months Ended August 31, 2014 and 2013 | 6
|  | Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements | 7
| Item 2. | Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations | 25
| Item 3. | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk | 38
| Item 4. | Controls and Procedures | 38
PART II. | OTHER INFORMATION |
| Item 1. | Legal Proceedings | 39
| Item 1A. | Risk Factors | 39
| Item 2. | Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds | 39
| Item 6. | Exhibits | 40
SIGNATURES | 41
EXHIBIT INDEX | 42

Page 2

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

CARMAX, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Consolidated Statements of Earnings

(Unaudited)

|  | Three Months Ended August 31 |  | Six Months Ended August 31
(In thousands except per share data) |  | 2014 | % (1) |  | 2013 | % (1) |  | 2014 | % (1) |  | 2013 | % (1)
SALES AND OPERATING REVENUES: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Used vehicle sales | $ | 2,920,165 | 81.1 | $ | 2,639,523 | 81.3 | $ | 5,980,506 | 81.4 | $ | 5,341,278 | 81.5
New vehicle sales |  | 69,944 | 1.9 |  | 60,002 | 1.8 |  | 139,733 | 1.9 |  | 112,429 | 1.7
Wholesale vehicle sales |  | 530,270 | 14.7 |  | 474,907 | 14.6 |  | 1,075,515 | 14.6 |  | 965,566 | 14.7
Other sales and revenues |  | 78,815 | 2.2 |  | 71,120 | 2.2 |  | 153,636 | 2.1 |  | 137,336 | 2.1
NET SALES AND OPERATING REVENUES |  | 3,599,194 | 100.0 |  | 3,245,552 | 100.0 |  | 7,349,390 | 100.0 |  | 6,556,609 | 100.0
Cost of sales |  | 3,135,855 | 87.1 |  | 2,810,809 | 86.6 |  | 6,384,320 | 86.9 |  | 5,673,770 | 86.5
GROSS PROFIT |  | 463,339 | 12.9 |  | 434,743 | 13.4 |  | 965,070 | 13.1 |  | 882,839 | 13.5
CARMAX AUTO FINANCE INCOME |  | 92,574 | 2.6 |  | 84,422 | 2.6 |  | 187,189 | 2.5 |  | 171,441 | 2.6
Selling, general and administrative expenses |  | 297,638 | 8.3 |  | 283,206 | 8.7 |  | 611,084 | 8.3 |  | 573,395 | 8.7
Interest expense |  | 7,351 | 0.2 |  | 7,761 | 0.2 |  | 14,952 | 0.2 |  | 15,639 | 0.2
Other expense |  | 283 | ― |  | 1,073 | ― |  | 560 | ― |  | 832 | ―
Earnings before income taxes |  | 250,641 | 7.0 |  | 227,125 | 7.0 |  | 525,663 | 7.2 |  | 464,414 | 7.1
Income tax provision |  | 96,123 | 2.7 |  | 86,851 | 2.7 |  | 201,492 | 2.7 |  | 177,489 | 2.7
NET EARNINGS | $ | 154,518 | 4.3 | $ | 140,274 | 4.3 | $ | 324,171 | 4.4 | $ | 286,925 | 4.4
WEIGHTED AVERAGE COMMON SHARES: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Basic |  | 218,180 |  |  | 223,610 |  |  | 219,224 |  |  | 224,114 |
Diluted |  | 221,070 |  |  | 227,634 |  |  | 222,351 |  |  | 228,093 |
NET EARNINGS PER SHARE: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Basic | $ | 0.71 |  | $ | 0.63 |  | $ | 1.48 |  | $ | 1.28 |
Diluted | $ | 0.70 |  | $ | 0.62 |  | $ | 1.46 |  | $ | 1.26 |

(1)C alculated as a percentage of net sales and operating revenues and may not equal totals due to rounding.

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

Page 3

CARMAX, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income

(Unaudited)

| Three Months Ended August 31 | Six Months Ended August 31
(In thousands) | 2014 |  | 2013 |  |  | 2014 |  |  | 2013 |
NET EARNINGS | $ | 154,518 |  | $ | 140,274 |  | $ | 324,171 |  | $ | 286,925 |
Other comprehensive income, net of taxes: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Net change in retirement benefit plan |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
unrecognized actuarial losses |  | 213 |  |  | 270 |  |  | 426 |  |  | 526 |
Net change in cash flow hedge |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
unrecognized losses |  | 1,096 |  |  | 3,331 |  |  | 1,378 |  |  | 5,373 |
Other comprehensive income, net of taxes |  | 1,309 |  |  | 3,601 |  |  | 1,804 |  |  | 5,899 |
TOTAL COMPREHENSIVE INCOME | $ | 155,827 |  | $ | 143,875 |  | $ | 325,975 |  | $ | 292,824 |

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

Page 4

CARMAX, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Consolidated Balance Sheets

|  |  | (Unaudited) |  |  |
|  |  | As of August 31 | As of February 28
(In thousands except share data) |  | 2014 | 2014
ASSETS |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| CURRENT ASSETS: |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| Cash and cash equivalents |  | $ | 354,600 |  | $ | 627,901 |
| Restricted cash from collections on auto loan receivables |  |  | 297,068 |  |  | 259,299 |
| Accounts receivable, net |  |  | 108,859 |  |  | 79,923 |
| Inventory |  |  | 1,708,955 |  |  | 1,641,424 |
| Deferred income taxes |  |  | 8,275 |  |  | 7,866 |
| Other current assets |  |  | 38,685 |  |  | 26,811 |
| TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS |  |  | 2,516,442 |  |  | 2,643,224 |
| Auto loan receivables, net |  |  | 7,844,268 |  |  | 7,147,848 |
| Property and equipment, net |  |  | 1,753,992 |  |  | 1,652,977 |
| Deferred income taxes |  |  | 157,175 |  |  | 152,199 |
| Other assets |  |  | 128,036 |  |  | 110,909 |
| TOTAL ASSETS |  | $ | 12,399,913 |  | $ | 11,707,157 |
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| CURRENT LIABILITIES: |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| Accounts payable |  | $ | 418,269 |  | $ | 427,492 |
| Accrued expenses and other current liabilities |  |  | 205,480 |  |  | 202,588 |
| Accrued income taxes |  |  | 244 |  |  | 2,438 |
| Short-term debt |  |  | 2,229 |  |  | 582 |
| Current portion of finance and capital lease obligations |  |  | 20,280 |  |  | 18,459 |
| Current portion of non-recourse notes payable |  |  | 260,425 |  |  | 223,938 |
| TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES |  |  | 906,927 |  |  | 875,497 |
| Finance and capital lease obligations, excluding current portion |  |  | 310,689 |  |  | 315,925 |
| Non-recourse notes payable, excluding current portion |  |  | 7,648,284 |  |  | 7,024,506 |
| Other liabilities |  |  | 176,026 |  |  | 174,232 |
| TOTAL LIABILITIES |  |  | 9,041,926 |  |  | 8,390,160 |
| Commitments and contingent liabilities |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY: |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| Common stock, $0.50 par value; 350,000,000 shares authorized; |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| 216,704,250 and 221,685,984 shares issued and outstanding |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| as of August 31, 2014 and February 28, 2014, respectively |  |  | 108,352 |  |  | 110,843 |
| Capital in excess of par value |  |  | 1,089,317 |  |  | 1,038,209 |
| Accumulated other comprehensive loss |  |  | (44,467) |  |  | (46,271) |
| Retained earnings |  |  | 2,204,785 |  |  | 2,214,216 |
| TOTAL SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY |  |  | 3,357,987 |  |  | 3,316,997 |
| TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY |  | $ | 12,399,913 |  | $ | 11,707,157 |

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

Page 5

CARMAX, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(Unaudited)

|  | Six Months Ended August 31
(In thousands) |  | 2014 |  | 2013
OPERATING ACTIVITIES: |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Net earnings |  | $ | 324,171 |  | $ | 286,925 |
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to net cash |  |  |  |  |  |  |
used in operating activities: |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Depreciation and amortization |  |  | 55,766 |  |  | 49,160 |
Share-based compensation expense |  |  | 37,778 |  |  | 38,002 |
Provision for loan losses |  |  | 36,208 |  |  | 29,318 |
Provision for cancellation reserves |  |  | 38,463 |  |  | 18,324 |
Deferred income tax benefit |  |  | (6,530) |  |  | (3,200) |
Loss on disposition of assets and other |  |  | 917 | – |  | 930 |
Net (increase) decrease in: |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Accounts receivable, net |  |  | (28,936) |  |  | 6,412 |
Inventory |  |  | (67,531) |  |  | 153,797 |
Other current assets |  |  | (11,706) |  |  | (746) |
Auto loan receivables, net |  |  | (732,628) |  |  | (799,385) |
Other assets |  |  | (313) |  |  | (6,736) |
Net decrease in: |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other current |  |  |  |  |  |  |
liabilities and accrued income taxes |  |  | (36,052) |  |  | (13,913) |
Other liabilities |  |  | (46,226) |  |  | (22,497) |
NET CASH USED IN OPERATING ACTIVITIES |  |  | (436,619) |  |  | (263,609) |
INVESTING ACTIVITIES: |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Capital expenditures |  |  | (135,293) |  |  | (136,011) |
Proceeds from sales of assets |  |  | 5,829 |  |  | 4,716 |
Increase in restricted cash from collections on auto loan receivables |  |  | (37,769) |  |  | (27,053) |
Increase in restricted cash in reserve accounts |  |  | (6,640) |  |  | (5,319) |
Release of restricted cash from reserve accounts |  |  | 1,634 |  |  | 15,017 |
(Purchases) sales of money market securities, net |  |  | (8,753) |  |  | 1,337 |
Purchases of trading securities |  |  | (3,107) |  |  | (1,405) |
Sales of trading securities |  |  | 306 |  |  | 33 |
NET CASH USED IN INVESTING ACTIVITIES |  |  | (183,793) |  |  | (148,685) |
FINANCING ACTIVITIES: |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Increase in short-term debt, net |  |  | 1,647 |  |  | 1,384 |
Payments on finance and capital lease obligations |  |  | (8,712) |  |  | (10,932) |
Issuances of non-recourse notes payable |  |  | 3,803,000 |  |  | 3,530,000 |
Payments on non-recourse notes payable |  |  | (3,142,735) |  |  | (2,654,658) |
Repurchase and retirement of common stock |  |  | (373,362) |  |  | (179,278) |
Equity issuances, net |  |  | 37,483 |  |  | 14,753 |
Excess tax benefits from share-based payment arrangements |  |  | 29,790 |  |  | 11,693 |
NET CASH PROVIDED BY FINANCING ACTIVITIES |  |  | 347,111 |  |  | 712,962 |
(Decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents |  |  | (273,301) |  |  | 300,668 |
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year |  |  | 627,901 |  |  | 449,364 |
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF PERIOD |  | $ | 354,600 |  | $ | 750,032 |
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Cash paid for interest |  | $ | 15,029 |  | $ | 15,714 |
Cash paid for income taxes |  | $ | 191,401 |  | $ | 155,623 |
Non-cash investing and financing activities: |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Increase in accrued capital expenditures |  | $ | 18,173 |  | $ | 19,745 |
Finance lease modifications |  | $ | 5,297 |  | $ | ― |

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

Page 6

CARMAX, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

1.Background

CarMax, Inc. (“we,” “our,” “us,” “CarMax” and “the company”), including its wholly owned subsidiaries, is the largest retailer of used vehicles in the United States. We operate in two reportable segments: CarMax Sales Operations and CarMax Auto Finance (“CAF”). Our CarMax Sales Operations segment consists of all aspects of our auto merchandising and service operations, excluding financing provided by CAF. Our CAF segment consists solely of our own finance operation that provides vehicle financing through CarMax stores.

We were the first used vehicle retailer to offer a large selection of high quality used vehicles at low, no-haggle prices using a customer-friendly sales process in an attractive, modern sales facility. We provide customers with a full range of related products and services, including the appraisal and purchase of vehicles directly from consumers; the financing of vehicle purchases through CAF and third-party financing providers; the sale of extended protection plan (“EPP”) products, which include extended service plans (“ESP”) and guaranteed asset protection (“GAP”); and vehicle repair service. Vehicles purchased through the appraisal process that do not meet our retail standards are sold to licensed dealers through on-site wholesale auctions. At select locations we also sell new vehicles under franchise agreements.

2.Accounting Policies

Basis of Presentation and Use of Estimates. The accompanying interim unaudited consolidated financial statements include the accounts of CarMax and our wholly owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. These consolidated financial statements have been prepared in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) for interim financial information. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by U.S. GAAP for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, such interim consolidated financial statements reflect all normal recurring adjustments considered necessary to present fairly the financial position and the results of operations and cash flows for the interim periods presented. The results of operations for the interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full fiscal year. These consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and footnotes included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended

February 28, 2014.

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to current year’s presentation. Amounts and percentages may not total due to rounding.

Cash and Cash Equivalents. Cash equivalents of $327.0 million as of August 31, 2014, and $607.0 million as of February 28, 2014, consisted of highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less.

Restricted Cash from Collections on Auto Loan Receivables. Cash accounts totaling $297.1 million as of August 31, 2014, and $259.3 million as of February 28, 2014, consisted of collections of principal and interest payments on securitized auto loan receivables that are restricted for payment to the securitization investors pursuant to the applicable securitization agreements.

Securitizations. We maintain a revolving securitization program composed of two warehouse facilities (“warehouse facilities”) that we use to fund auto loan receivables originated by CAF until we elect to fund them through a term securitization or alternative funding arrangement. We sell the auto loan receivables to a wholly owned, bankruptcy-remote, special purpose entity that transfers an undivided percentage ownership interest in the receivables, but not the receivables themselves, to entities formed by third-party investors. These entities issue asset-backed commercial paper or utilize other funding sources supported by the transferred receivables, and the proceeds are used to finance the securitized receivables.

We typically use term securitizations to provide long-term funding for most of the auto loan receivables initially securitized through the warehouse facilities. In these transactions, a pool of auto loan receivables is sold to a bankruptcy-remote, special purpose entity that, in turn, transfers the receivables to a special purpose securitization trust. The securitization trust issues asset-backed securities, secured or otherwise supported by the transferred receivables, and the proceeds from the sale of the asset-backed securities are used to finance the securitized receivables.

Page 7

We are required to evaluate term securitization trusts for consolidation. In our capacity as servicer, we have the power to direct the activities of the trusts that most significantly impact the economic performance of the trusts. In addition, we have the obligation to absorb losses (subject to limitations) and the rights to receive any returns of the trusts, which could be significant. Accordingly, we are the primary beneficiary of the trusts and are required to consolidate them.

We recognize transfers of auto loan receivables into the warehouse facilities and term securitizations (“securitization vehicles”) as secured borrowings, which result in recording the auto loan receivables and the related non-recourse notes payable to the investors on our consolidated balance sheets.

The securitized receivables can only be used as collateral to settle obligations of the securitization vehicles. The securitization vehicles and investors have no recourse to our assets beyond the securitized receivables, the amounts on deposit in reserve accounts and the restricted cash from collections on auto loan receivables. We have not provided financial or other support to the securitization vehicles that was not previously contractually required, and there are no additional arrangements, guarantees or other commitments that could require us to provide financial support to the securitization vehicles.

See Notes 4 and 10 for additional information on auto loan receivables and non-recourse notes payable.

Auto Loan Receivables, Net. Auto loan receivables include amounts due from customers related to retail vehicle sales financed through CAF. The receivables are presented net of an allowance for estimated loan losses. The allowance for loan losses represents an estimate of the amount of net losses inherent in our portfolio of managed receivables as of the applicable reporting date and anticipated to occur during the following 12 months. The allowance is primarily based on the credit quality of the underlying receivables, historical loss trends and forecasted forward loss curves. We also take into account recent trends in delinquencies and losses, recovery rates and the economic environment. The provision for loan losses is the periodic expense of maintaining an adequate allowance.

An account is considered delinquent when the related customer fails to make a substantial portion of a scheduled payment on or before the due date. In general, accounts are charged-off on the last business day of the month during which the earliest of the following occurs: the receivable is 120 days or more delinquent as of the last business day of the month, the related vehicle is repossessed and liquidated, or the receivable is otherwise deemed uncollectible. For purposes of determining impairment, auto loans are evaluated collectively, as they represent a large group of smaller-balance homogeneous loans, and therefore, are not individually evaluated for impairment. See Note 4 for additional information on auto loan receivables.

Interest income and expenses related to auto loans are included in CAF income. Interest income on auto loan receivables is recognized when earned based on contractual loan terms. All loans continue to accrue interest until repayment or charge‑off. Direct costs associated with loan originations are not considered material, and thus, are expensed as incurred. See Note 3 for additional information on CAF income.

Property and Equipment, Net. Property and equipment is reported net of accumulated depreciation and amortization of $778.7 million and $730.6 million as of August 31, 2014 and February 28, 2014, respectively.

Other Assets. Other assets includes amounts classified as restricted cash on deposit in reserve accounts and restricted investments. The restricted cash on deposit in reserve accounts is for the benefit of holders of non-recourse notes payable, and these funds are not expected to be available to the company or its creditors. In the event that the cash generated by the securitized receivables in a given period was insufficient to pay the interest, principal and other required payments, the balances on deposit in the reserve accounts would be used to pay those amounts. Restricted cash on deposit in reserve accounts was $37.5 million as of August 31, 2014, and $32.5 million as of February 28, 2014.

Restricted investments includes money market securities primarily held to satisfy certain insurance program requirements, as well as investments held in a rabbi trust established to fund informally our executive deferred compensation plan. The rabbi trust investments are classified as trading securities with realized and unrealized gains and losses reflected as a component of other expense. Restricted investments was $52.1 million as of August 31, 2014, and $40.2 million as of February 28, 2014.

Revenue Recognition. We recognize revenue when the earnings process is complete, generally either at the time of sale to a customer or upon delivery to a customer. As part of our customer service strategy, we guarantee the retail vehicles we

Page 8

sell with a 5‑day, money-back guarantee. We record a reserve for estimated returns based on historical experience and trends.

We sell EPP products on behalf of unrelated third parties to customers who purchase a vehicle. In May 2014, the ESPs we offer on all used vehicles were modified to provide coverage of 60 months (subject to mileage limitations). Prior to this modification, the ESPs we offered provided coverage up to 72 months. GAP covers the customer for the term of their finance contract. We recognize commission revenue at the time of sale, net of a reserve for estimated customer cancellations. Periodically, we may receive additional commissions based upon the level of underwriting profits of the third parties who administer the products. These additional commissions are recognized as revenue when received. The reserve for cancellations is evaluated for each product, and is based on forecasted forward cancellation curves utilizing historical experience, recent trends and credit mix of the customer base. Our risk related to customer cancellations is limited to the commissions that we receive. Cancellations fluctuate depending on the volume of EPP sales, customer financing default or prepayment rates, and shifts in customer behavior, including those related to changes in the coverage or term of the product. The current portion of estimated cancellation reserves is recognized as a component of other current liabilities with the remaining amount recognized in other liabilities. See Note 7 for additional information on cancellation reserves.

Customers applying for financing who are not approved by CAF may be evaluated by other financial institutions. Depending on the credit profile of the customer, third-party finance providers generally either pay us or are paid a fixed, pre-negotiated fee per contract. We recognize these fees at the time of sale.

We collect sales taxes and other taxes from customers on behalf of governmental authorities at the time of sale. These taxes are accounted for on a net basis and are not included in net sales and operating revenues or cost of sales.

Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities. We enter into derivative instruments to manage exposures that arise from business activities that result in the future known receipt or payment of uncertain cash amounts, the values of which are impacted by interest rates. We recognize the derivatives at fair value as either current assets or current liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets, and where applicable, such contracts covered by master netting agreements are reported net. Gross positive fair values are netted with gross negative fair values by counterparty. The accounting for changes in the fair value of derivatives depends on the intended use of the derivative, whether we have elected to designate a derivative in a hedging relationship and apply hedge accounting, and whether the hedging relationship has satisfied the criteria necessary to apply hedge accounting. We may enter into derivative contracts that are intended to economically hedge certain risks, even though hedge accounting may not apply or we do not elect to apply hedge accounting. See Note 5 for additional information on derivative instruments and hedging activities.

3.CarMax Auto Finance Income

CAF provides financing to qualified customers purchasing vehicles at CarMax stores. CAF provides us the opportunity to capture additional sales, profits and cash flows while managing our reliance on third-party finance sources. Management regularly analyzes CAF's operating results by assessing profitability, the performance of the auto loan receivables including trends in credit losses and delinquencies, and CAF direct expenses. This information is used to assess CAF's performance and make operating decisions including resource allocation.

We typically use securitizations to fund loans originated by CAF, as discussed in Note 2. CAF income primarily reflects the interest and fee income generated by the auto loan receivables less the interest expense associated with the debt issued to fund these receivables, a provision for estimated loan losses and direct CAF expenses.

CAF income does not include any allocation of indirect costs. Although CAF benefits from certain indirect overhead expenditures, we present this information on a direct basis to avoid making subjective decisions regarding the indirect benefits or costs that could be attributed to CAF. Examples of indirect costs not allocated to CAF include retail store expenses and corporate expenses such as human resources, administrative services, marketing, information systems, accounting, legal, treasury and executive payroll. In addition, except for auto loan receivables, which are disclosed in Note 4, CAF assets are not separately reported nor do we allocate assets to CAF because such allocation would not be useful to management in making operating decisions.

Components of CAF Income

| Three Months Ended August 31 |  | Six Months Ended August 31

Page 9

(In millions) | 2014 | % (1) | 2013 | % (1) |  | 2014 | % (1) | 2013 | % (1)
Interest margin: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Interest and fee income |  | $ | 150.7 |  | 7.8 |  | $ | 137.2 |  | 8.4 |  | $ | 297.6 |  | 7.9 |  | $ | 270.7 |  | 8.5
Interest expense |  |  | (23.9) |  | (1.2) |  |  | (22.6) |  | (1.4) |  |  | (47.0) |  | (1.2) |  |  | (45.4) |  | (1.4)
Total interest margin |  |  | 126.8 |  | 6.6 |  |  | 114.6 |  | 7.0 |  |  | 250.6 |  | 6.6 |  |  | 225.3 |  | 7.1
Provision for loan losses |  |  | (20.4) |  | (1.1) |  |  | (18.0) |  | (1.1) |  |  | (36.2) |  | (1.0) |  |  | (29.3) |  | (0.9)
Total interest margin after |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
provision for loan losses |  |  | 106.4 |  | 5.5 |  |  | 96.6 |  | 5.9 |  |  | 214.4 |  | 5.7 |  |  | 196.0 |  | 6.2
Other income |  |  | ― |  | ― |  |  | 0.1 |  | ― |  |  | ― |  | ― |  |  | 0.1 |  | ―
Direct expenses: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Payroll and fringe benefit expense |  |  | (6.3) |  | (0.3) |  |  | (5.6) |  | (0.3) |  |  | (12.5) |  | (0.3) |  |  | (11.1) |  | (0.4)
Other direct expenses |  |  | (7.5) |  | (0.4) |  |  | (6.7) |  | (0.4) |  |  | (14.7) |  | (0.4) |  |  | (13.6) |  | (0.4)
Total direct expenses |  |  | (13.8) |  | (0.7) |  |  | (12.3) |  | (0.7) |  |  | (27.2) |  | (0.7) |  |  | (24.7) |  | (0.8)
CarMax Auto Finance income |  | $ | 92.6 |  | 4.8 |  | $ | 84.4 |  | 5.2 |  | $ | 187.2 |  | 5.0 |  | $ | 171.4 |  | 5.4
Total average managed receivables |  | $ | 7,724.5 |  |  |  | $ | 6,516.3 |  |  |  | $ | 7,557.3 |  |  |  | $ | 6,334.4 |  |

(1)Annualized percentage of total average managed receivables.

4.Auto Loan Receivables

Auto loan receivables include amounts due from customers related to retail vehicle sales financed through CAF and are presented net of an allowance for estimated loan losses. We use warehouse facilities to fund auto loan receivables originated by CAF until we elect to fund them through a term securitization or alternative funding arrangement. The majority of the auto loan receivables serve as collateral for the related non-recourse notes payable of $7.91 billion as of August 31, 2014, and $7.25 billion as of February 28, 2014. See Notes 2 and 10 for additional information on securitizations and non-recourse notes payable.

Auto Loan Receivables, Net

| As of August 31 | As of February 28
(In millions) |  | 2014 |  |  | 2014 |
Warehouse facilities | $ | 1,045.0 |  | $ | 879.0 |
Term securitizations |  | 6,603.3 |  |  | 6,145.5 |
Other receivables (1) |  | 242.7 |  |  | 159.9 |
Total ending managed receivables |  | 7,891.0 |  |  | 7,184.4 |
Accrued interest and fees |  | 31.8 |  |  | 26.3 |
Other |  | (0.7) |  |  | 7.0 |
Less allowance for loan losses |  | (77.8) |  |  | (69.9) |
Auto loan receivables, net | $ | 7,844.3 |  | $ | 7,147.8 |

(1)Other receivables includes receivables not funded through the warehouse facilities or term securitizations.

Credit Quality. When customers apply for financing, CAF’s proprietary scoring models rely on the customers’ credit history and certain application information to evaluate and rank their risk. Credit histories are obtained from credit bureau reporting agencies and include information such as number, age, type and payment history for prior or existing credit

Page 10

accounts. The application information that is used includes income, collateral value and down payment. The scoring models yield credit grades that represent the relative likelihood of repayment. Customers assigned a grade of “A” are determined to have the highest probability of repayment, and customers assigned a lower grade are determined to have a lower probability of repayment. For loans that are approved, the credit grade influences the terms of the agreement, such as the required loan-to-value ratio and interest rate.

CAF uses a combination of the initial credit grades and historical performance to monitor the credit quality of the auto loan receivables on an ongoing basis. We validate the accuracy of the scoring models periodically. Loan performance is reviewed on a recurring basis to identify whether the assigned grades adequately reflect the customers’ likelihood of repayment.

Ending Managed Receivables by Major Credit Grade

|  |  | As of August 31 |  | As of February 28
(In millions) |  |  | 2014 (1) |  | % (2) |  |  | 2014 (1) |  | % (2)
A |  | $ | 3,867.3 |  | 49.0 |  | $ | 3,506.0 |  | 48.8
B |  |  | 2,884.9 |  | 36.6 |  |  | 2,658.5 |  | 37.0
C and other |  |  | 1,138.8 |  | 14.4 |  |  | 1,019.9 |  | 14.2
Total ending managed receivables |  | $ | 7,891.0 |  | 100.0 |  | $ | 7,184.4 |  | 100.0

(1)Classified based on credit grade assigned when customers were initially approved for financing.

(2)Percentage of total ending managed receivables.

Allowance for Loan Losses

|  | Three Months Ended August 31 |  | Six Months Ended August 31
(In millions) |  |  | 2014 |  | % (1) |  |  | 2013 |  | % (1) |  |  | 2014 |  | % (1) |  |  | 2013 |  | % (1) |
Balance as of beginning of period |  | $ | 75.4 |  | 1.00 |  | $ | 60.9 |  | 0.96 |  | $ | 69.9 |  | 0.97 |  | $ | 57.3 |  | 0.97 |
Charge-offs |  |  | (36.9) |  |  |  |  | (31.8) |  |  |  |  | (68.9) |  |  |  |  | (58.2) |  |  |
Recoveries |  |  | 18.9 |  |  |  |  | 18.8 |  |  |  |  | 40.6 |  |  |  |  | 37.5 |  |  |
Provision for loan losses |  |  | 20.4 |  |  |  |  | 18.0 |  |  |  |  | 36.2 |  |  |  |  | 29.3 |  |  |
Balance as of end of period |  | $ | 77.8 |  | 0.99 |  | $ | 65.9 |  | 0.99 |  | $ | 77.8 |  | 0.99 |  | $ | 65.9 |  | 0.99 |

(1)Percentage of total ending managed receivables as of the corresponding reporting date.

The allowance for loan losses represents an estimate of the amount of net losses inherent in our portfolio of managed receivables as of the applicable reporting date and anticipated to occur during the following 12 months. The allowance is primarily based on the credit quality of the underlying receivables, historical loss trends and forecasted forward loss curves. We also take into account recent trends in delinquencies and losses, recovery rates and the economic environment. The provision for loan losses is the periodic expense of maintaining an adequate allowance.

Page 11

Past Due Receivables

|  |  | As of August 31 |  | As of February 28
(In millions) |  |  | 2014 |  | % (1) |  | 2014 | % (1)
Total ending managed receivables |  | $ | 7,891.0 |  | 100.0 |  | $ | 7,184.4 |  | 100.0
Delinquent loans: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
31-60 days past due |  | $ | 150.0 |  | 1.9 |  | $ | 126.6 |  | 1.8
61-90 days past due |  |  | 52.1 |  | 0.7 |  |  | 42.6 |  | 0.6
Greater than 90 days past due |  |  | 17.9 |  | 0.2 |  |  | 16.0 |  | 0.2
Total past due |  | $ | 220.0 |  | 2.8 |  | $ | 185.2 |  | 2.6

(1)Percentage of total ending managed receivable s.

5.Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities

Risk Management Objective of Using Derivatives. We are exposed to certain risks arising from both our business operations and economic conditions, particularly with regard to future issuances of fixed-rate debt and existing and future issuances of floating-rate debt. Primary exposures include LIBOR and other rates used as benchmarks in our securitizations. We enter into derivative instruments to manage exposures that arise from business activities that result in the future known receipt or payment of uncertain cash amounts, the values of which are impacted by interest rates. Our derivative instruments are used to manage differences in the amount of our known or expected cash receipts and our known or expected cash payments principally related to the funding of our auto loan receivables.

We do not anticipate significant market risk from derivatives as they are predominantly used to match funding costs to the use of the funding. However, disruptions in the credit or interest rate markets could impact the effectiveness of our hedging strategies.

Credit risk is the exposure to nonperformance of another party to an agreement. We mitigate credit risk by dealing with highly rated bank counterparties.

Designated Cash Flow Hedges. Our objectives in using interest rate derivatives are to add stability to CAF’s interest expense, to manage our exposure to interest rate movements and to better match funding costs to the interest received on the fixed-rate receivables being securitized. To accomplish these objectives, we primarily use interest rate swaps that involve the receipt of variable amounts from a counterparty in exchange for our making fixed-rate payments over the life of the agreements without exchange of the underlying notional amount. These interest rate swaps are designated as cash flow hedges of forecasted interest payments in anticipation of permanent funding in the term securitization market.

For derivatives that are designated and qualify as cash flow hedges, the effective portion of changes in the fair value is initially recorded in accumulated other comprehensive loss (“AOCL”) and is subsequently reclassified into CAF income in the period that the hedged forecasted transaction affects earnings. The ineffective portion of the change in fair value of the derivatives is recognized directly in CAF income. Amounts reported in AOCL related to derivatives will be reclassified to CAF income as interest expense is incurred on our future issuances of fixed-rate debt. During the next 12 months, we estimate that an additional $11.0 million will be reclassified as a decrease to CAF income.

As of August 31, 2014 and February 28, 2014 we had interest rate swaps outstanding with combined notional amounts of $1,021.0 million and $869.0 million, respectively, which were designated as cash flow hedges of interest rate risk.

As of August 31, 2014 and February 28, 2014, we had no derivatives that were not designated as accounting hedges.

Page 12

Fair Values of Derivative Instruments

| As of August 31, 2014 | As of February 28, 2014
(In thousands) | Assets | Liabilities | Assets | Liabilities
Derivatives designated as accounting hedges: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Interest rate swaps (1) |  | $ | 94 |  | $ | ― |  | $ | ― |  | $ | ― |
Interest rate swaps (2) |  | $ | ― |  | $ | (1,211) |  | $ | ― |  | $ | (1,351) |
Total |  | $ | 94 |  | $ | (1,211) |  | $ | ― |  | $ | (1,351) |

(1)Reported in other current assets on the consolidated balance sheets.

(2)Reported in accounts payable on the consolidated balance sheets.

Effect of Derivative Instruments on Comprehensive Income

|  | Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended
|  | August 31 | August 31
(In thousands) |  | 2014 | 2013 | 2014 | 2013
Derivatives designated as accounting hedges: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
(Loss)/gain recognized in AOCL (1) |  | $ | (271) |  | $ | 2,890 |  | $ | (2,069) |  | $ | 3,352
Loss reclassified from AOCL into CAF income (1) |  | $ | (2,076) |  | $ | (2,605) |  | $ | (4,339) |  | $ | (5,510)
Gain recognized in CAF Income (2) |  | $ | ― |  | $ | 57 |  | $ | ― |  | $ | 78

(1)Represents the effective portion.

(2)Represents the ineffective portion.

6.Fair Value Measurements

Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants in the principal market or, if none exists, the most advantageous market, for the specific asset or liability at the measurement date (referred to as the “exit price”). The fair value should be based on assumptions that market participants would use, including a consideration of nonperformance risk.

We assess the inputs used to measure fair value using the three-tier hierarchy. The hierarchy indicates the extent to which inputs used in measuring fair value are observable in the market.

Level 1 Inputs include unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that we can access at the measurement date.

Level 2 Inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly, including quoted prices for similar assets in active markets, quoted prices from identical or similar assets in inactive markets and observable inputs such as interest rates and yield curves.

Level 3 Inputs that are significant to the measurement that are not observable in the market and include management's judgments about the assumptions market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability (including assumptions about risk).

Our fair value processes include controls that are designed to ensure that fair values are appropriate. Such controls include model validation, review of key model inputs, analysis of period-over-period fluctuations and reviews by senior management.

Valuation Methodologies

Money Market Securities. Money market securities are cash equivalents, which are included in either cash and cash equivalents or other assets, and consist of highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less. We

Page 13

use quoted market prices for identical assets to measure fair value. Therefore, all money market securities are classified as Level 1.

Mutual Fund Investments. Mutual fund investments consist of publicly traded mutual funds that primarily include diversified investments in large-, mid- and small-cap domestic and international companies. The investments, which are included in other assets, are held in a rabbi trust established to fund informally our executive deferred compensation plan. We use quoted active market prices for identical assets to measure fair value. Therefore, all mutual fund investments are classified as Level 1.

Derivative Instruments. The fair values of our derivative instruments are included in either other current assets or accounts payable. As described in Note 5, as part of our risk management strategy, we utilize derivative instruments to manage differences in the amount of our known or expected cash receipts and our known or expected cash payments principally related to the funding of our auto loan receivables. Our derivatives are not exchange-traded and are over-the-counter customized derivative instruments. All of our derivative exposures are with highly rated bank counterparties.

We measure derivative fair values assuming that the unit of account is an individual derivative instrument and that derivatives are sold or transferred on a stand-alone basis. We estimate the fair value of our derivatives using quotes determined by the derivative counterparties and third-party valuation services. Quotes from third-party valuation services and quotes received from bank counterparties project future cash flows and discount the future amounts to a present value using market-based expectations for interest rates and the contractual terms of the derivative instruments. The models do not require significant judgment and model inputs can typically be observed in the liquid market; however, because the models include inputs other than quoted prices in active markets, all derivatives are classified as Level 2.

Our derivative fair value measurements consider assumptions about counterparty and our own nonperformance risk. We monitor counterparty and our own nonperformance risk and, in the event that we determine that a party is unlikely to perform under terms of the contract, we would adjust the derivative fair value to reflect the nonperformance risk.

Page 14

Items Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis

| As of August 31, 2014
(In thousands) | Level 1 | Level 2 | Total
Assets: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Money market securities | $ | 370,384 |  | $ | ― |  | $ | 370,384 |
Mutual fund investments |  | 8,726 |  |  | ― |  |  | 8,726 |
Derivative instruments |  | ― |  |  | 94 |  |  | 94 |
Total assets at fair value | $ | 379,110 |  | $ | 94 |  | $ | 379,204 |
Percentage of total assets at fair value |  | 100.0 | % |  | ― | % |  | 100.0 | %
Percentage of total assets |  | 3.1 | % |  | ― | % |  | 3.1 | %
Liabilities: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Derivative instruments | $ | ― |  | $ | 1,211 |  | $ | 1,211 |
Total liabilities at fair value | $ | ― |  | $ | 1,211 |  | $ | 1,211 |
Percentage of total liabilities |  | ― | % |  | ― | % |  | ― | %

| As of February 28, 2014
(In thousands) | Level 1 | Level 2 | Total
Assets: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Money market securities | $ | 641,622 |  | $ | ― |  | $ | 641,622 |
Mutual fund investments |  | 5,609 |  |  | ― |  |  | 5,609 |
Total assets at fair value | $ | 647,231 |  | $ | ― |  | $ | 647,231 |
Percentage of total assets at fair value |  | 100.0 | % |  | ― | % |  | 100.0 | %
Percentage of total assets |  | 5.5 | % |  | ― | % |  | 5.5 | %
Liabilities: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Derivative instruments | $ | ― |  | $ | 1,351 |  | $ | 1,351 |
Total liabilities at fair value | $ | ― |  | $ | 1,351 |  | $ | 1,351 |
Percentage of total liabilities |  | ― | % |  | ― | % |  | ― | %

7.Cancellation Reserves

We recognize commission revenue for EPP products at the time of sale, net of a reserve for estimated contract cancellations. Cancellations of these services may result from early termination by the customer, or default or prepayment on the finance contract. The reserve for cancellations is evaluated for each product, and is based on forecasted forward cancellation curves utilizing historical experience, recent trends and credit mix of the customer base.

Cancellation Reserves

|  | Three Months Ended August 31 |  | Six Months Ended August 31, 2014
(In millions) |  |  | 2014 |  |  | 2013 |  |  | 2014 |  |  | 2013

Page 15

Balance as of beginning of period |  | $ | 81.1 |  | $ | 33.3 |  | $ | 72.5 |  | $ | 32.7
Cancellations |  |  | (12.5) |  |  | (8.5) |  |  | (25.0) |  |  | (17.0)
Provision for future cancellations |  |  | 17.4 |  |  | 9.2 |  |  | 38.5 |  |  | 18.3
Balance as of end of period |  | $ | 86.0 |  | $ | 34.0 |  | $ | 86.0 |  | $ | 34.0

8.Income Taxes

We had $28.3 million of gross unrecognized tax benefits as of August 31, 2014, and $26.3 million as of February 28, 2014. There were no significant changes to the gross unrecognized tax benefits as reported for the year ended February 28, 2014, as all activity was related to positions taken on tax returns filed or intended to be filed in the current fiscal year.

9.Retirement Plans

Effective December 31, 2008, we froze both of our noncontributory defined benefit plans: our pension plan (the “pension plan”) and our unfunded, nonqualified plan (the “restoration plan”), which restores retirement benefits for certain associates who are affected by Internal Revenue Code limitations on benefits provided under the pension plan. No additional benefits have accrued under these plans since that date. In connection with benefits earned prior to December 31, 2008, we have a continuing obligation to fund the pension plan and will continue to recognize net periodic pension expense for both plans. We use a fiscal year end measurement date for both the pension plan and the restoration plan.

Components of Net Pension Expense

|  |  | Three Months Ended August 31
(In thousands) |  |  | Pension Plan |  |  | Restoration Plan |  |  | Total
|  |  | 2014 |  |  | 2013 |  |  | 2014 |  |  | 2013 |  |  | 2014 |  |  | 2013
Interest cost |  | $ | 2,008 |  | $ | 1,895 |  | $ | 113 |  | $ | 98 |  | $ | 2,121 |  | $ | 1,993
Expected return on plan assets |  |  | (2,247) |  |  | (1,978) |  |  | ― |  |  | ― |  |  | (2,247) |  |  | (1,978)
Recognized actuarial loss |  |  | 340 |  |  | 429 |  |  | ― |  |  | ― |  |  | 340 |  |  | 429
Net pension expense |  | $ | 101 |  | $ | 346 |  | $ | 113 |  | $ | 98 |  | $ | 214 |  | $ | 444

|  |  | Six Months Ended August 31
(In thousands) |  |  | Pension Plan |  |  | Restoration Plan |  |  | Total
|  |  | 2014 |  |  | 2013 |  |  | 2014 |  |  | 2013 |  |  | 2014 |  |  | 2013
Interest cost |  | $ | 4,016 |  | $ | 3,791 |  | $ | 226 |  | $ | 197 |  | $ | 4,242 |  | $ | 3,988
Expected return on plan assets |  |  | (4,514) |  |  | (3,958) |  |  | ― |  |  | ― |  |  | (4,514) |  |  | (3,958)
Recognized actuarial loss |  |  | 680 |  |  | 837 |  |  | ― |  |  | ― |  |  | 680 |  |  | 837
Net pension expense |  | $ | 182 |  | $ | 670 |  | $ | 226 |  | $ | 197 |  | $ | 408 |  | $ | 867

We made $1.0 million in contributions to the pension plan during the six months ended August 31, 2014, and anticipate making $1.3 million in contributions during the remainder of fiscal 2015. The expected long-term rate of return on plan assets for the pension plan was 7.75% as of February 28, 2014.

10.Debt

|  | As of August 31 | As of February 28
(In thousands) | 2014 | 2014
Short-term revolving credit facility |  | $ | 2,229 |  | $ | 582 |
Current portion of finance and capital lease obligations |  |  | 20,280 |  |  | 18,459 |

Page 16

Current portion of non-recourse notes payable |  |  | 260,425 |  |  | 223,938 |
Total current debt |  |  | 282,934 |  |  | 242,979 |
Finance and capital lease obligations, excluding current portion |  |  | 310,689 |  |  | 315,925 |
Non-recourse notes payable, excluding current portion |  |  | 7,648,284 |  |  | 7,024,506 |
Total debt, excluding current portion |  |  | 7,958,973 |  |  | 7,340,431 |
Total debt |  | $ | 8,241,907 |  | $ | 7,583,410 |

Revolving Credit Facility. Our $700 million unsecured revolving credit facility (the “credit facility”) expires in August 2016. Borrowings under the credit facility are available for working capital and general corporate purposes. Borrowings accrue interest at variable rates based on LIBOR, the federal funds rate, or the prime rate, depending on the type of borrowing, and we pay a commitment fee on the unused portions of the available funds. As of August 31, 2014, the unused capacity of approximately $698 million was fully available to us.

Finance and Capital Lease Obligations. Finance and capital lease obligations relate primarily to stores subject to sale-leaseback transactions that did not qualify for sale accounting, and therefore, are accounted for as financings. The leases were structured at varying interest rates and generally have initial lease terms ranging from 15 to 20 years with payments made monthly. Payments on the leases are recognized as interest expense and a reduction of the obligations. We have not entered into any sale-leaseback transactions since fiscal 2009.

Non-Recourse Notes Payable. The non-recourse notes payable relate to auto loan receivables funded through term securitizations and our warehouse facilities. The timing of principal payments on the non-recourse notes payable is based on principal collections, net of losses, on the securitized auto loan receivables. The current portion of non-recourse notes payable represents principal payments that are due to be distributed in the following period.

As of August 31, 2014, $6.86 billion of non-recourse notes payable was outstanding related to term securitizations. These notes payable accrue interest at fixed rates and have scheduled maturities through February 2021, but may mature earlier or later, depending upon the repayment rate of the underlying auto loan receivables.

As of August 31, 2014, $1.04 billion of non-recourse notes payable was outstanding related to our warehouse facilities. The combined warehouse facility limit was $2.1 billion, and unused warehouse capacity totaled $1.06 billion. In July 2014, we increased the combined limit of our warehouse facilities by an additional $300 million. During the second quarter of fiscal 2015, we renewed our $800 million warehouse facility that was scheduled to expire in August 2014 for an additional 364-day term. Of the combined warehouse facility limit, $1.3 billion will expire in February 2015 and $800 million will expire in July 2 015. The return requirements of the warehouse facility investors could fluctuate significantly depending on market conditions. At renewal, the cost, structure and capacity of the facilities could change. These changes could have a significant impact on our funding costs.

See Notes 2 and 4 for additional information on the related securitized auto loan receivables.

Financial Covenants. The credit facility agreement contains representations and warranties, conditions and covenants. We must also meet financial covenants in conjunction with certain of the sale-leaseback transactions. Our securitization agreements contain representations and warranties, financial covenants and performance triggers. As of August 31, 2014, we were in compliance with all financial covenants and our securitized receivables were in compliance with the related performance triggers.

1 1.Stock and Stock-Based Incentive Plans

(A)Share Repurchase Program

In fiscal 2013, our board of directors authorized the repurchase of up to $800 million of our common stock, and on April 4, 2014, we announced that they had authorized the repurchase of up to an additional $1 billion of our common stock. During the quarter ended August 31, 2014, we exhausted the initial $800 million authorization and, as of August 31, 2014, $907.0 m illion was available for repurchase unde r the $1 billion authorization, which expires on December 31, 2015.

For the three months ended August 31, 2014, we repurchased 4,024,801 shares of common stock at an average purchase pric e of $49.92 per share. For the six months ended August 31, 2014, we repurchased 7,866,740 shares of common stock at an average purchase price of $47.68 per share. For the three months ended August 31, 2013, we repurchased 1,046,629

Page 17

shares of common stock at an average purchase price of $46.54 per share. For the six months ended August 31, 2013, we purchased 3,992,251 shares of common stock at an average price of $43.40 per share.

(B)Stock Incentive Plans

We maintain long-term incentive plans for management, key employees and the nonemployee members of our board of directors. The plans allow for the granting of equity-based compensation awards, including nonqualified stock options, incentive stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock awards, stock- and cash-settled restricted stock units, stock grants or a combination of awards. To date, we have not awarded any incentive stock options.

The majority of associates who receive share-based compensation awards primarily receive cash-settled restricted stock units. Senior management and other key associates receive awards of nonqualified stock options and stock-settled restricted stock units. Nonemployee directors receive awards o f nonqualified stock options, stock grants and/or restricted stock awards. Excluding stock grants, all share-based compensation awards, including any associated dividend rights, are subject to forfeiture.

Nonqualified Stock Options. Nonqualified stock options are awards that allow the recipient to purchase shares of our common stock at a fixed price. Stock options are granted at an exercise price equal to the fair market value of our common stock on the grant date. The stock options generally vest annually in equal amounts over periods of one to four years. These option s expire no later than ten years after the date of the grant.

Cash-Settled Restricted Stock Units. Also referred to as restricted stock units, or RSUs, these are awards that entitle the holder to a cash payment equal to the fair market value of a share of our common stock for each unit granted. Conversion generally occurs at the end of a three-year vesting period. However, the cash payment per RSU will not be greater than 200% or less than 75% of the fair market value of a share of our common stock on the grant date. RSUs are liability awards and do not have voting rights.

Stock-Settled Restricted Stock Units. Also referred to as market stock units, or MSUs, these are awards to eligible key associates that are converted into between zero and two shares of common stock for each unit granted. Conversion generally occurs at the end of a three-year vesting period. The conversion ratio is calculated by dividing the average closing price of our stock during the final forty trading days of the three-year vesting period by our stock price on the grant date, with the resulting quotient capped at two. This quotient is then multiplied by the number of MSUs granted to yield the number of shares awarded. MSU s do not have voting rights.

Restricted Stock Awards. Restricted stock awards (RSAs) are awards of our common stock that are subject to specified restrictions that lapse one year from the grant date. Participants holding RSAs are entitled to vote on matters submitted to holders of our common stock for a vote. During the six months ended August 31, 2014, we granted to our board of directors RSAs of 22,860 shares at a fair value per share on the grant date of $51.18. No RSAs were outstanding during the six months ended August 31, 2013. The unrecognized compensation costs related to nonvested RSAs totaled $0.2 million as of August 31, 2014. These costs are expected to be recognized on a straight-line basis over a weighted average period of 0.8 years.

(C)Share-Based Compensation

Composition of Share-Based Compensation Expense

|  | Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended
|  | August 31 | August 31
(In thousands) |  | 2014 | 2013 | 2014 | 2013
Cost of sales |  | $ | 1,247 |  | $ | 586 |  | $ | 1,574 |  | $ | 1,859 |
CarMax Auto Finance income |  |  | 961 |  |  | 730 |  |  | 1,637 |  |  | 1,512 |
Selling, general and administrative expenses |  |  | 20,493 |  |  | 14,063 |  |  | 35,209 |  |  | 35,237 |
Share-based compensation expense, before income taxes |  | $ | 22,701 |  | $ | 15,379 |  | $ | 38,420 |  | $ | 38,608 |

Composition of Share-Based Compensation Expense – By Grant Type

|  | Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended
|  | August 31 | August 31

Page 18

(In thousands) |  | 2014 | 2013 | 2014 | 2013
Nonqualified stock options |  | $ | 6,887 |  | $ | 5,786 |  | $ | 15,007 |  | $ | 12,819 |
Cash-settled restricted stock units |  |  | 11,074 |  |  | 5,884 |  |  | 14,221 |  |  | 17,972 |
Stock-settled restricted stock units |  |  | 3,472 |  |  | 2,891 |  |  | 7,593 |  |  | 6,711 |
Employee stock purchase plan |  |  | 311 |  |  | 318 |  |  | 642 |  |  | 606 |
Restricted stock awards to non-employee directors |  |  | 957 |  |  | ― |  |  | 957 |  |  | ― |
Stock grants to non-employee directors |  |  | ― |  |  | 500 |  |  | ― |  |  | 500 |
Share-based compensation expense, before income taxes |  | $ | 22,701 |  | $ | 15,379 |  | $ | 38,420 |  | $ | 38,608 |

We recognize compensati on expense for stock options, MSUs and RSAs on a straight-line basis (net of estimated forfeitures) over the requisite service period, which is generally the vesting period of the award. The variable expense associated with RSUs is recognized over their vesting period (net of estimated forfeitures) and is calculated based on the volume-weighted average price of our common stock on the last trading day of each reporting period. The total costs for matching contributions for our employee stock purchase plan are included in share-based compensation expense. There were no capitalized share-based compensation costs as of or for the six months ended August 31, 2014 or 2013.

Stock Option Activity

|  |  |  |  |  | Weighted |  |  |  |
|  |  |  |  |  | Average |  |  |  |
|  |  |  | Weighted |  | Remaining |  | Aggregate
| Number of | Average |  | Contractual |  | Intrinsic
(Shares and intrinsic value in thousands) | Shares | Exercise Price |  | Life (Years) |  | Value
Outstanding as of February 28, 2014 |  | 10,018 |  | $ | 27.02 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Options granted |  | 2,003 |  |  | 44.96 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Options exercised |  | (2,591) |  |  | 17.09 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Options forfeited or expired |  | (16) |  |  | 32.69 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Outstanding as of August 31, 2014 |  | 9,414 |  | $ | 33.56 |  |  |  | 4.4 |  |  | $ | 177,333 |
Exercisable as of August 31, 2014 |  | 4,979 |  | $ | 27.40 |  |  |  | 3.3 |  |  | $ | 124,494 |

During the six months ended August 31, 2014 and 2013, we granted nonqualified options to purchase 2,003,238 and 1,601,699 shares of common stock, respectively. The total cash received as a result of stock option exercises for the six months ended August 31, 2014 and 2013, was $44.3 million and $20.8 million, respectively. We settle stock option exercises with authorized but unissued shares of our common stock. The total intrinsic value of options exercised for the six months ended August 31, 2014 and 2013, was $85.9 million and $29.5 million, respectively. We realized related tax benefits of $34.6 million and $11.8 million during the six months ended August 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively.

Outstanding Stock Options

|  |  |  |  |  | As of August 31, 2014
|  |  |  |  |  | Options Outstanding |  | Options Exercisable
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Weighted |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Average | Weighted |  |  |  |  | Weighted
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Remaining | Average |  |  |  |  | Average
(Shares in thousands) | Number of | Contractual | Exercise |  | Number of | Exercise
Range of Exercise Prices | Shares | Life (Years) | Price |  | Shares | Price
$ | 11.43 |  |  |  |  |  | 554 |  |  | 1.6 |  | $ | 11.43 |  |  |  | 554 |  | $ | 11.43 |
$ | 13.19 | - | $ | 19.82 |  |  | 488 |  |  | 0.9 |  | $ | 15.57 |  |  |  | 488 |  | $ | 15.57 |
$ | 19.98 | - | $ | 25.39 |  |  | 1,288 |  |  | 2.7 |  | $ | 25.19 |  |  |  | 1,288 |  | $ | 25.19 |
$ | 28.81 | - | $ | 32.69 |  |  | 3,511 |  |  | 4.2 |  | $ | 32.12 |  |  |  | 2,181 |  | $ | 32.22 |

Page 19

$ | 33.11 | - | $ | 49.25 |  |  | 3,573 |  |  | 6.1 |  | $ | 43.89 |  |  |  | 468 |  | $ | 42.21 |
Total |  |  |  |  |  |  | 9,414 |  |  | 4.4 |  | $ | 33.56 |  |  |  | 4,979 |  | $ | 27.40 |

For stock options, the fair value of each award is estimated as of the date of grant using a binomial valuation model. In computing the value of the option, the binomial model considers characteristics of fair-value option pricing that are not available for consideration under a closed-form valuation model (for example, the Black-Scholes model), such as the contractual term of the option, the probability that the option will be exercised prior to the end of its contractual life and the probability of termination or retirement of the option holder. For this reason, we believe that the binomial model provides a fair value that is more representative of actual experience and future expected experience than the value calculated using a closed-form model. Estimates of fair value are not intended to predict actual future events or the value ultimately realized by the recipients of share-based awards.

The weighted average fair value per share at the date of grant for options granted during the six months ended August 31, 2014 and 2013, was $13.21 and $15.59, respectively. The unrecognized compensation costs related to nonvested options totaled $43.7 million as of August 31, 2014. These costs are expected to be recognized on a straight-line basis over a weighted average period of 2.5 years.

Assumptions Used to Estimate Option Values

|  | Six Months Ended August 31
|  | 2014 |  | 2013
Dividend yield |  |  |  |  | 0.0 | % |  |  |  |  | 0.0 | %
Expected volatility factor (1) |  | 25.2 | % | - | 32.7 | % |  | 28.1 | % | - | 46.8 | %
Weighted average expected volatility |  |  |  |  | 31.9 | % |  |  |  |  | 44.7 | %
Risk-free interest rate (2) |  | 0.03 | % | - | 2.7 | % |  | 0.02 | % | - | 2.6 | %
Expected term (in years) (3) |  |  |  |  | 4.7 |  |  |  |  |  | 4.7 |

(1)Measured using historical daily price changes of our stock for a period corresponding to the term of the options and the implied volatility derived from the market prices of traded options on our stock.

(2)Based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant.

(3)Represents the estimated number of years that options will be outstanding prior to exercise.

Cash-Settled Restricted Stock Unit Activity

|  |  |  | Weighted
|  |  |  | Average
|  | Number of | Grant Date
(Units in thousands) |  | Units | Fair Value
Outstanding as of February 28, 2014 |  | 1,531 |  | $ | 35.68 |
Stock units granted |  | 588 |  | $ | 44.96 |
Stock units vested and converted |  | (463) |  | $ | 32.77 |
Stock units cancelled |  | (65) |  | $ | 38.86 |
Outstanding as of August 31, 2014 |  | 1,591 |  | $ | 39.82 |

During the six months ended August 31, 2014 and 2013, we granted 587,511 and 541,819 RSUs, respectively. The initial fair market value per RSU at the date of grant for the RSUs granted during the six months ended August 31, 2014 and 2013, was $44.96 and $42.68, respectively. The RSUs are cash-settled upon vesting. During the six months ended August 31, 2014 we paid $21.2 million and $23.0 million, respectively (before payroll tax withholdings), to RSU holders upon the vesting of RSUs. We realized tax benefits of $8.6 million and $9.2 million during the six months ended August 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively.

Page 20

Expected Cash Settlement Range Upon Restricted Stock Unit Vesting

|  | As of August 31, 2014
(In thousands) |  | Minimum (1) | Maximum (1)
Fiscal 2016 |  | $ | 12,376 |  | $ | 33,003 |
Fiscal 2017 |  |  | 14,100 |  |  | 37,600 |
Fiscal 2018 |  |  | 16,285 |  |  | 43,428 |
Total expected cash settlements |  | $ | 42,761 |  | $ | 114,031 |

(1)Net of estimated forfeitures.

Stock-Settled Restricted Stock Unit Activity

|  |  |  | Weighted
|  |  |  | Average
|  | Number of | Grant Date
(Units in thousands) |  | Units | Fair Value
Outstanding as of February 28, 2014 |  | 852 |  | $ | 45.26 |
Stock units granted |  | 245 |  | $ | 55.37 |
Stock units vested and converted |  | (289) |  | $ | 45.65 |
Stock units cancelled |  | ― |  | $ | ― |
Outstanding as of August 31, 2014 |  | 808 |  | $ | 48.18 |

During the six months ended August 31, 2014 and 2013, we granted 245,190 and 236,675 MSUs, respectively. The weighted average fair value per MSU at the date of grant for MSUs granted during the six months ended August 31, 2014 and 2013, was $55.37 and $51.98, respectively. The fair values were determined using a Monte-Carlo simulation and were based on the expected market price of our common stock on the vesting date and the expected number of converted common shares. We realized related tax benefits of $7.4 million and $6.7 million for the six months ended August 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively, from the vesting of market stock units. The unrecognized compensation costs related to nonvested MSUs totaled $19.0 million as of August 31, 2014. These costs are expected to be recognized on a straight-line basis over a weighted average period of 1.4 years.

1 2.Net Earnings per Share

Basic net earnings per share is computed by dividing net earnings available for basic common shares by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding. Diluted net earnings per share is computed by dividing net earnings available for diluted common shares by the sum of weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding and dilu tive potential commo n stock.

Basic and Dilutive Net Earnings Per Share Reconciliations

|  | Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended
|  | August 31 | August 31
(In thousands except per share data) |  | 2014 | 2013 | 2014 | 2013
Net earnings |  | $ | 154,518 |  | $ | 140,274 |  | $ | 324,171 |  | $ | 286,925 |
Weighted average common shares outstanding |  |  | 218,180 |  |  | 223,610 |  |  | 219,224 |  |  | 224,114 |
Dilutive potential common shares: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Stock options |  |  | 2,269 |  |  | 3,319 |  |  | 2,520 |  |  | 3,257 |
Stock-settled restricted stock units and awards |  |  | 621 |  |  | 705 |  |  | 607 |  |  | 722 |
Weighted average common shares and dilutive |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
potential common shares |  |  | 221,070 |  |  | 227,634 |  |  | 222,351 |  |  | 228,093 |

Page 21

Basic net earnings per share |  | $ | 0.71 |  | $ | 0.63 |  | $ | 1.48 |  | $ | 1.28 |
Diluted net earnings per share |  | $ | 0.70 |  | $ | 0.62 |  | $ | 1.46 |  | $ | 1.26 |

Certain weighted-average options to purchase shares of common stock were outstanding and not included in the calculation of diluted net earnings per share because their inclusion would have been antidilutive. For the three months ended August 31, 2014 and 2013, weighted-average options to purchase 2,885,903 shares and 1,426,163 shares of common stock, respectively, were not included. For the six months ended August 31, 2014 and 2013, weighted-average options to purchase 2,586,357 shares and 1,073,635 shares respectively, were not included.

1 3.Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss

Changes in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss by Component

|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Total
|  | Net |  |  |  |  |  | Accumulated
|  | Unrecognized |  | Net |  | Other
|  | Actuarial |  | Unrecognized |  | Comprehensive
(In thousands, net of income taxes) |  | Losses |  | Hedge Losses |  | Loss
Balance as of February 28, 2014 |  | $ | (38,715) |  |  | $ | (7,556) |  |  | $ | (46,271) |
Other comprehensive loss before reclassifications |  |  | ― |  |  |  | (1,255) |  |  |  | (1,255) |
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss |  |  | 426 |  |  |  | 2,633 |  |  |  | 3,059 |
Other comprehensive income |  |  | 426 |  |  |  | 1,378 |  |  |  | 1,804 |
Balance as of August 31, 2014 |  | $ | (38,289) |  |  | $ | (6,178) |  |  | $ | (44,467) |

Page 22

Changes In and Reclassifications Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss

|  | Three Months Ended August 31 |  | Six Months Ended August 31 |
(In thousands) |  | 2014 |  | 2013 |  | 2014 |  | 2013 |
Retirement Benefit Plans (Note 9): |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Actuarial loss amortization reclassifications recognized |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
in net pension expense: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Cost of sales | $ | 138 | $ | 172 | $ | 276 | $ | 334 |
CarMax Auto Finance income |  | 8 |  | 10 |  | 15 |  | 19 |
Selling, general and administrative expenses |  | 194 |  | 247 |  | 389 |  | 484 |
Total amortization reclassifications recognized |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
in net pension expense |  | 340 |  | 429 |  | 680 |  | 837 |
Tax expense |  | (127) |  | (159) |  | (254) |  | (311) |
Amortization reclassifications recognized in net |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
pension expense, net of tax |  | 213 |  | 270 |  | 426 |  | 526 |
Net change in retirement benefit plan unrecognized |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
actuarial losses, net of tax |  | 213 |  | 270 |  | 426 |  | 526 |
Cash Flow Hedges (Note 5): |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Effective portion of changes in fair value |  | (271) |  | 2,890 |  | (2,069) |  | 3,352 |
Tax benefit/(expense) |  | 107 |  | (1,139) |  | 814 |  | (1,320) |
Effective portion of changes in fair value, net of tax |  | (164) |  | 1,751 |  | (1,255) |  | 2,032 |
Reclassifications to CarMax Auto Finance income |  | 2,076 |  | 2,605 |  | 4,339 |  | 5,510 |
Tax expense |  | (816) |  | (1,025) |  | (1,706) |  | (2,169) |
Reclassification of hedge losses, net of tax |  | 1,260 |  | 1,580 |  | 2,633 |  | 3,341 |
Net change in cash flow hedge unrecognized losses, |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
net of tax |  | 1,096 |  | 3,331 |  | 1,378 |  | 5,373 |
Total other comprehensive income, net of tax | $ | 1,309 | $ | 3,601 | $ | 1,804 | $ | 5,899 |

Changes in the funded status of our retirement plans and the effective portion of changes in the fair value of derivatives that are designated and qualify as cash flow hedges are recognized in accumulated other comprehensive loss. The cumulative balances are net of deferred taxes of $26.5 million as of August 31, 2014, and $27.7 million as of February 28, 2014.

14.Contingent Liabilities

Litigation. On April 2, 2008, Mr. John Fowler filed a putative class action lawsuit against CarMax Auto Superstores California, LLC and CarMax Auto Superstores West Coast, Inc. in the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles. Subsequently, two other lawsuits, Leena Areso et al. v. CarMax Auto Superstores California, LLC and Justin Weaver v. CarMax Auto Superstores California, LLC, were consolidated as part of the Fowler case. The allegations in the consolidated case involved: (1) failure to provide meal and rest breaks or compensation in lieu thereof; (2) failure to pay wages of terminated or resigned employees related to meal and rest breaks and overtime; (3) failure to pay overtime; (4) failure to comply with itemized employee wage statement provisions; (5) unfair competition; and (6) California’s Labor Code Private Attorney General Act. The putative class consisted of sales consultants, sales managers, and other hourly employees who worked for the company in California from April 2, 2004, to the present. On May 12, 2009, the court dismissed all of the class claims with respect to the sales manager putative class. On June 16, 2009, the court dismissed all claims related to the failure to comply with the itemized employee wage statement provisions. The court also granted CarMax’s motion for summary adjudication with regard to CarMax’s alleged failure to pay overtime to the sales consultant putative class. The plaintiffs appealed the court's ruling regarding the sales consultant overtime claim. On May 20, 2011, the California Court of Appeal affirmed the ruling in favor of CarMax. The plaintiffs filed a Petition of Review

Page 23

with the California Supreme Court, which was denied. As a result, the plaintiffs’ overtime claims are no longer a part of the lawsuit.

The claims currently remaining in the lawsuit regarding the sales consultant putative class are: (1) failure to provide meal and rest breaks or compensation in lieu thereof; (2) failure to pay wages of terminated or resigned employees related to meal and rest breaks; (3) unfair competition; and (4) California’s Labor Code Private Attorney General Act. On June 16, 2009, the court entered a stay of these claims pending the outcome of a California Supreme Court case involving unrelated third parties but related legal issues. Subsequently, CarMax moved to lift the stay and compel the plaintiffs’ remaining claims into arbitration on an individual basis, which the court granted on November 21, 2011. The plaintiffs appealed the court’s ruling to the California Court of Ap peal. On March 26, 2013, th e California Court of Appeal reversed the trial court's order granting CarMax's motion to compel arbitration. On October 8, 2013, CarMax filed a petition for a writ of certiorari seeking review in the United States Supreme Court. On February 24, 2014, the United States Supreme Court granted CarMax's petition for certiorari, vacated the California Court of Appeal decision and remanded the case to the California Court of Appeal for further consideration. The Fowler laws uit seeks compensator y and special damages, wages, interest, civil and statutory penalties, restitution, injunctive relief and the recovery of attorneys’ fees. We are unable to make a reasonable estimate of the amount or range of loss that could result from an unfavorable outcome in these matters.

We are involved in various other legal proceedings in the normal course of business. Based upon our evaluation of information currently available, we believe that the ultimate resolution of any such proceedings will not have a material effect, either individually or in the aggregate, on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

Gain Contingency. The Company is a class member in a consolidated and settled class action lawsuit (In Re Toyota Motor Corp. Unintended Acceleration Marketing, Sales Practices, and Products Liability Litig., Case No. 10-2151 (C.D. Cal.), consolidated as of April 9, 2010) against Toyota Motor Corp. and Toyota Motor Sales, USA, Inc. (collectively, “Toyota”) related to the economic loss associated with certain Toyota vehicles equipped with electronic throttle controls systems and the potential unintended acceleration of these vehicles. On July 9, 2014, we received $20.9 million in the settlement of this matter and recorded the gain at the time of receipt.

Page 24

ITEM 2.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (“MD&A”) is provided as a supplement to, and should be read in conjunction with, our audited consolidated financial statements, the accompanying notes and the MD&A included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended February 2 8, 201 4 (“fiscal 201 4”), as well as our consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes included in Item 1 of this Form 10-Q. Note references are to the notes to consolidated financial statements included in Item 1. All references to net earnings per share are to diluted net earnings per share. Amounts and percentages may not total due to rounding.

In this discussion, “we,” “our,” “us,” “CarMax,” “CarMax, Inc.” and “the company” refer to CarMax, Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiaries, unless the context requires otherwise.

BUSINESS OVERVIEW

CarMax is the nation’s largest retailer of used vehicles. We operate in two reportable segments: CarMax Sales Operations and CarMax Auto Finance (“CAF”). Our CarMax Sales Operations segment consists of all aspects of our auto merchandising and service operations, excluding financing provided by CAF. Our CAF segment consists solely of our own finance operation that provides vehicle financing through CarMax store s.

We pioneered the used car superstore concept, opening our first store in 1993. Our strategy is to revolutionize the auto retailing market by addressing the major sources of customer dissatisfaction with traditional auto retailers and to maximize operating efficiencies through the use of standardized operating procedures and store formats enhanced by sophisticated, proprietary management information systems. As of August 31, 2014, we operated 13 9 used car store s in 70 markets, comprising 50 mid-sized markets, 15 large markets and 5 small markets. We define mid-sized markets as those with television viewing populations generally between 600,000 and 2.5 million people. As of that date, w e also operated four new car franchises. During fiscal 2014, we sold 526,929 used cars, representing 99% of the total 534,690 vehicles we sold at retail.

We believe the CarMax consumer offer is distinctive within the auto retailing marketplace. Our offer provides customers the opportunity to shop for vehicles the same way they shop for items at other big box retailers. Our consumer offer features low, no‑haggle prices; a broad selection of CarMax Quality Certified used vehicles; and superior customer service. Our website, carmax.com, and related mobile apps are valuable tools for communicating the CarMax consumer offer, as well as sophisticated search engines and efficient channel s for customers who prefer to start their shopping online. Our financial results are driven by retailing used vehicles and associated items including vehicle financing, extended protection plan (“EPP”) products, as well as wholesale vehicle sales and vehicle repair service. EPP products include extended service plans (“ESPs”) and guaranteed asset protection (“GAP”), which is designed to cover the unpaid balance on an auto loan in the event of a total loss of the vehicle or unrecovered theft.

We seek to build customer satisfaction by offering high-quality retail vehicles. Fewer than half of the vehicles acquired from consumers through our appraisal purchase process meet our standards for reconditioning and subsequent retail sale. Those vehicles that do not meet our standards are sold through on-site wholesale auctions. Vehicles repossessed and liquidated by CAF are also generally sold through our wholesale auctions. Wholesale auctions are generally held on a weekly or bi-weekly basis, and as of August 31, 2014, we conducted auctions at 62 used car store s. During fiscal 2014, we sold 342,576 wholesale vehicles. On average, the vehicles we wholesale are approximately 10 years old and have more than 100,000 miles. Participation in our wholesale auctions is restricted to licensed automobile dealers, the majority of whom are independent dealers and licensed wholesalers.

We sell EPP s on behalf of unrelated third parties who are the primary obligors. E P P revenue represents commissions earned on the sale of ESPs and GAP from the unrelated third parties.

We provide financing to qualified retail customers through CAF and our arrangements with several industry-leading financial institutions. Depending on the credit profile of the customer, the third-party finance providers generally either pay us or are paid a fixed, pre-negotiated fee per contract. The fee amount is independent of any finance term offered to the customer; it does not vary based on the amount financed, the term of the loan, the interest rate or the loan-to-value ratio. We refer to the providers who pay us a fee as prime and nonprime providers, and we refer to the providers to whom we pay a fee as subprime

Page 25

providers. We periodically test additional third-party providers. We have no recourse liability for credit losses on retail installment contracts arranged with third-party providers.

We offer financing through CAF to qualified customers purchasing vehicles at CarMax stores. CAF utilizes proprietary customized scoring models based upon the credit history of the customer, along with CAF’s historical experience, to predict the likelihood of customer repayment. CAF offers customers an array of competitive rates and terms, allowing them to choose the ones that best fit their needs. In addition, customers are permitted to refinance or pay off their contract with CAF or a third-party provider within three business days of a purchase without incurring any finance or related charges. We test different credit offers and closely monitor acceptance rates, 3-day payoffs and the effect on sales to assess market competitiveness. After the effect of 3‑day payoffs and vehicle returns, CAF financed 41.0% of our retail vehicle unit sales in the first half of fiscal 201 5. As of August 31, 2014, CAF serviced approximately 575,000 customer accounts in its $7.89 billion portfolio of managed auto loan receivables.

Over the long term, we believe the primary driver for earnings growth will be vehicle unit sales growth from both new stores and stores included in our comparable store base. We also believe that increased used vehicle unit sales will drive increased sales of wholesale vehicles and ancillary products and, over time, increased CAF income. We target a dollar range of gross profit per used unit sold. The gross profit dollar target for an individual vehicle is based on a variety of factors, including its probability of sale and its mileage relative to its age; however, it is not primarily based on the vehicle’s selling price.

We currently plan to open 13 store s in fiscal 2015 and between 10 and 15 store s in each of the following two fiscal years. While we currently have nearly 140 store s, we are still in the midst of the national rollout of our retail concept, and as of August 31, 2014, we had used car store s located in marke ts that comprised approximately 60% of the U.S. population.

The principal challenges we face in expanding our store base include our ability to hire qualified associates and build our management bench strength to support our store growth, and our ability to procure suitable real estate at favorable terms. We staff each newly opened store with associates who have extensive CarMax training. Therefore, we must recruit, train and develop managers and associates to fill the pipeline necessary to support future store openings.

Fiscal 201 5 Second Quarter Highlights

| § |  | Net sales and operating revenues increased 10.9% to $3.60 billion from $3.25 billion in the second quarter of fiscal 201 4. Net earnings grew 10.2% to $1 54.5 million from $140.3 million in the prior year period, while net earnings per diluted share grew 1 2.9% to $0.70, compared with $0.62 in the prior year period.

| § |  | Net earnings for the second quarter of fiscal 2015 were increased by $12.9 million, or $0.06 per diluted share, in connection with our receipt of settlement proceeds in a previously disclosed class action lawsuit. Excluding this item, net earnings and net earnings per share increased 1.0% and 3.2%, respectively, versus the prior year’s second quarter.

| § |  | U sed vehicle revenues increased 10.6% to $2.92 billion from $2.64 billion in the second quarter of fiscal 201 4. Total used vehicle unit sales rose 6.3%, reflecting the combination of a 0.2% increase in comparable store used unit sales and sales from newer stores not yet included in the comparable store base.

| § |  | W holesale vehicle revenues increased 11.7% to $530.3 million from $474.9 million in the second quarter of fiscal 201 4. Wholesale unit sales rose 7.4%, reflecting a stronger wholesale buy rate and the growth of our store base.

| § |  | O ther sales and revenues increased 10.8% to $78.8 million from $71.1 million in the second quarter of fiscal 201 4, primarily reflecting an improvement in net third-party finance fees resulting from a decrease in the percentage of sales financed by our third-party subprime providers.

| § |  | Total g ross profit increased 6.6% to $463.3 million compared with $434.7 million in the second quarter of fiscal 201 4, largely reflecting the increase s in used and wholesale vehicle unit sales.

| § |  | Selling, general and administrative (“SG&A”) expenses increased 5.1% to $297.6 million from $283.2 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2014. The current year’s SG&A expense was reduced by $20.9 million for the class action settlement proceeds. Excluding this item, SG&A increased 12.5% year-over-year primarily due to the 1 5% increase in our store base since the beginning of last year’s second quarter (representing the addition of 1 8 stores), as well as a $6.4 million increase in share-based compensation expense. Excluding the legal settlement gain, SG&A per retail unit rose $116 to $2,183.

| § |  | CAF income increased 9.7% to $92.6 million compared with $84.4 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2014. The improvement resulted from a n 18.5% increase in average managed receivables, partially offset by a lower total Page 26

interest margin rate, which declined to 6.6% of average managed receivables from 7.0% in the prior year’s second quarter.

| § |  | In the first half of fiscal 2015, net cash used in operating activities totaled $436.6 million, compared with $263.6 million in the first half of fiscal 201 4. These amounts include increases in auto loan receivables of $732.6 m illion and $799.4 million, respectively. The majority of the increases in auto loan receivables are accompanied by increases in non-recourse notes payable, which are separately reflected as cash provided by financing activities. Excluding the increases in auto loan receivables, net cash provided by operating activities would have been $296.0 million in the first half of fiscal 201 5 versus $535.8 million in the first half of fiscal 201 4, with the decrease primarily driven by changes in inventory.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES

For information on critical accounting policies, see “Critical Accounting Policies” in MD&A included in Item 7 of the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended February 28, 2014. These policies relate to financing and securitization transactions, revenue recognition and income taxes.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS – CARMAX SALES OPERATIONS

Net Sales And Operating Revenues

| Three Months Ended August 31 | Six Months Ended August 31
(In millions) | 2014 | 2013 | Change | 2014 | 2013 | Change
Used vehicle sales | $ | 2,920.2 |  | $ | 2,639.5 |  | 10.6 | % | $ | 5,980.5 |  | $ | 5,341.3 |  | 12.0 | %
New vehicle sales |  | 69.9 |  |  | 60.0 |  | 16.6 | % |  | 139.7 |  |  | 112.4 |  | 24.3 | %
Wholesale vehicle sales |  | 530.3 |  |  | 474.9 |  | 11.7 | % |  | 1,075.5 |  |  | 965.6 |  | 11.4 | %
Other sales and revenues: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Extended protection plan revenues |  | 63.0 |  |  | 65.0 |  | (3.2) | % |  | 126.7 |  |  | 129.6 |  | (2.3) | %
Service department sales |  | 28.6 |  |  | 27.3 |  | 4.7 | % |  | 56.9 |  |  | 54.7 |  | 4.1 | %
Third-party finance fees, net |  | (12.7) |  |  | (21.2) |  | 39.9 | % |  | (30.0) |  |  | (47.0) |  | 36.2 | %
Total other sales and revenues |  | 78.8 |  |  | 71.1 |  | 10.8 | % |  | 153.6 |  |  | 137.3 |  | 11.9 | %
Total net sales and operating revenues | $ | 3,599.2 |  | $ | 3,245.6 |  | 10.9 | % | $ | 7,349.4 |  | $ | 6,556.6 |  | 12.1 | %

Unit Sales

| Three Months Ended August 31 | Six Months Ended August 31 |
| 2014 | 2013 | % Change | 2014 | 2013 |  | % Change
Used vehicles |  | 143,325 |  |  | 134,854 |  | 6.3 |  | % |  | 293,853 |  |  | 272,008 |  | 8.0 | % |
New vehicles |  | 2,581 |  |  | 2,187 |  | 18.0 |  | % |  | 5,178 |  |  | 4,136 |  | 25.2 | % |
Wholesale vehicles |  | 97,989 |  |  | 91,243 |  | 7.4 |  | % |  | 195,087 |  |  | 179,599 |  | 8.6 | % |

Average Selling Prices

| Three Months Ended August 31 | Six Months Ended August 31 |
| 2014 | 2013 | % Change | 2014 | 2013 |  | % Change
Used vehicles | $ | 20,215 |  | $ | 19,428 |  | 4.1 |  | % | $ | 20,193 |  | $ | 19,485 |  | 3.6 | % |
New vehicles | $ | 26,991 |  | $ | 27,313 |  | (1.2) |  | % | $ | 26,875 |  | $ | 27,066 |  | (0.7) | % |
Wholesale vehicles | $ | 5,249 |  | $ | 5,044 |  | 4.1 |  | % | $ | 5,349 |  | $ | 5,213 |  | 2.6 | % |

Vehicle Sales Changes

| Three Months Ended August 31 | Six Months Ended August 31
| 2014 | 2013 | 2014 | 2013
Used vehicle units |  | 6.3 | % |  | 21.1 | % |  | 8.0 | % |  | 21.6 | %
Used vehicle revenues |  | 10.6 | % |  | 20.4 | % |  | 12.0 | % |  | 21.9 | %
Wholesale vehicle units |  | 7.4 | % |  | 10.2 | % |  | 8.6 | % |  | 8.0 | %
Wholesale vehicle revenues |  | 11.7 | % |  | 8.7 | % |  | 11.4 | % |  | 6.7 | %

Page 27

Comparable store used unit sales growth is one of the key drivers of our profitability. A store is included in comparable store retail sales in the store’s fourteenth full month of operation.

Comparable Store Used Vehicle Sales Changes

| Three Months Ended August 31 | Six Months Ended August 31
| 2014 | 2013 | 2014 | 2013
Used vehicle units |  | 0.2 | % |  | 15.9 | % |  | 1.8 | % |  | 16.3 | %
Used vehicle dollars |  | 4.2 | % |  | 15.3 | % |  | 5.4 | % |  | 16.7 | %

Change in Used Car Store Base

| Three Months Ended August 31 | Six Months Ended August 31
| 2014 | 2013 | 2014 | 2013
Used car stores, beginning of period |  | 135 |  |  | 121 |  |  | 131 |  |  | 118 |
Store openings |  | 4 |  |  | 2 |  |  | 8 |  |  | 5 |
Used car stores, end of period |  | 139 |  |  | 123 |  |  | 139 |  |  | 123 |

We opened eight stores during the first half of fiscal 2015, including six stores in new markets (Rochester, New York; Dothan, Alabama; Spokane, Washington; Madison, Wisconsin; Lynchburg, Virginia; and Portland, Oregon) and two stores in existing markets (Harrisburg/Lancaster, Pennsylvania and Dallas, Texas). The Dothan, Alabama and Lynchburg, Virginia stores are part of our test involving smaller format stores in smaller markets, and they are anticipated to sell fewer vehicles compared with stores in larger markets.

Used Vehicle Sales. The 10.6% increase in used vehicle revenues in the second quarter of fiscal 2015 resulted from a 6.3% increase in used unit sales and a 4.1% increase in average selling price. The increase in used unit sales included a 0.2% increase in comparable store used unit sales and sales from newer stores not yet included in the comparable store base. While we experienced a continued improvement in customer traffic in comparable stores, sales were tempered by the effect of a calendar shift (one fewer Saturday) which we estimate adversely affected comparable store used unit sales growth by approximately 1%. The percentage of retail vehicles financed by third-party subprime providers, combined with those financed under the previously announced CAF loan origination test, declined from 18.5% in the second quarter of fiscal 2014 to 13.8% in this year’s second quarter. The mix of our retail vehicles financed by CAF, prime, nonprime and subprime providers may vary from quarter to quarter depending on several factors including the credit quality of applicants, changes in p roviders’ credit decisioning and external market conditions. Changes in originations by one tier of credit providers may also affect the originations made by providers in other tiers. The increase in our average selling price reflected both strong industry wholesale pricing in the spring of calendar year 2014, which increased our vehicle acquisition costs, and an increase in the mix of our sales represented by later model, age 0-4 year-old vehicles.

The 12.0% increase in used vehicle revenues in the first half of fiscal 2015 resulted from an 8.0% increase in used unit sales and a 3.6% increase in average selling price. The increase in used unit sales included a 1.8% increase in comparable store used unit sales and sales from newer stores not yet included in the comparable store base. T he comparable store used unit growth for the first half of the year was driven by improved customer traffic. The percentage of retail vehicles financed by third-party subprime providers, combined with those financed under the previously announced CAF loan origination test, declined from 19.9% in the first half of fiscal 2014 to 15.0% in this year’s first half. The factors that contributed to the increase in average selling price in the second quarter of fiscal 2015 also contributed to the increase for the first half of the fiscal year.

Wholesale Vehicle Sales. Our wholesale auction prices usually reflect the trends in the general wholesale market for the types of vehicles we sell, although they can also be affected by changes in vehicle mix or the average age, mileage or condition of the vehicles bought through our appraisal process and sold in our auctions.

The 11.7% increase in wholesale vehicle revenues in the second quarter of fiscal 2015 resulted from a 7.4% increase in wholesale unit sales and a 4.1% increase in average selling price. Wholesale unit sales benefited from a stronger wholesale vehicle buy rate and the growth in our store base.

Page 28

The 11.4% increase in wholesale vehicle revenues in the first half of fiscal 2015 resulted from an 8.6% increase in wholesale unit sales and a 2.6% increase in average selling price. The increase in wholesale unit sales reflected a combination of a stronger wholesale vehicle buy rate, increased appraisal traffic at comparable stores and the growth in our store base.

Other Sales and Revenues. Other sales and revenues include commissions on the sale of EPPs, which include ESP and GAP revenues, net of a reserve for e stimated customer cancellations; service department sales; and net third-party finance fees. The fixed, per-vehicle fees paid to us by prime and nonprime third-party finance providers may vary, reflecting the providers’ differing levels of credit risk exposure. The fixed, per-vehicle fees that we pay to the subprime providers are reflected as an offset to finance fee revenues received from prime and nonprime providers.

Other sales and revenues increased $7.7 million, or 10.8%, in the second quarter of fiscal 2015. E PP revenues declined $2.1 million versus the corresponding prior period level due to higher estimated cancellation reserve rates and a lower EPP penetration rate, partially offset by the growth in our store base. Net third-party finance fees improved $8.5 million versus last year’s second quarter primarily due to a mix shift among third party providers.

Other sales and revenues increased $16.3 million, or 11.9%, in the first half of fiscal 2015. EPP revenues declined $2.9 million compared with the first half of fiscal 2014 due to higher estimated cancellation reserve rates and a lower EPP penetration rate, partially offset by the growth in our store base. Net third-party finance fees improved $17.0 million versus the first half of fiscal 2014 primarily due to the reduction in the percentage of sales financed by subprime providers.

Seasonality. Historically, our business has been seasonal. Typically, our store s experience their strongest traffic and sales in the spring and summer quarters. Sales are typically slowest in the fall quarter, when u sed vehicles generally experience proportionately more of their annual depreciation. We believe this is partly the result of a decline in customer traffic, as well as discounts on model year closeouts that can pressure pricing for late-model used vehicles. Customer traffic generally tends to slow in the fall as the weather changes and as customers shift their spending priorities. We typically experience an increase in traffic and sales in February and March, coincident with tax refund season.

Gross Profit

| Three Months Ended August 31 | Six Months Ended August 31
(In millions) | 2014 | 2013 | Change | 2014 | 2013 | Change
Used vehicle gross profit | $ | 311.5 |  | $ | 293.2 |  |  | 6.2 | % | $ | 645.6 |  | $ | 597.1 |  |  | 8.1 | %
New vehicle gross profit |  | 2.1 |  |  | 1.2 |  |  | 71.0 | % |  | 3.9 |  |  | 2.3 |  |  | 71.2 | %
Wholesale vehicle gross profit |  | 85.7 |  |  | 77.5 |  |  | 10.5 | % |  | 187.2 |  |  | 164.0 |  |  | 14.2 | %
Other gross profit |  | 64.1 |  |  | 62.9 |  |  | 2.0 | % |  | 128.3 |  |  | 119.5 |  |  | 7.4 | %
Total | $ | 463.3 |  | $ | 434.7 |  |  | 6.6 | % | $ | 965.1 |  | $ | 882.8 |  |  | 9.3 | %

Gross Profit Per Unit

| Three Months Ended August 31 | Six Months Ended August 31
| 2014 | 2013 | 2014 | 2013
| $ per unit(1) | %(2) |  | $ per unit(1) | %(2) |  | $ per unit(1) | %(2) |  | $ per unit(1) | %(2) |
Used vehicle gross profit | $ | 2,173 |  | 10.7 |  | $ | 2,174 |  | 11.1 |  | $ | 2,197 |  | 10.8 |  | $ | 2,195 |  | 11.2 |
New vehicle gross profit | $ | 803 |  | 3.0 |  | $ | 554 |  | 2.0 |  | $ | 756 |  | 2.8 |  | $ | 553 |  | 2.0 |
Wholesale vehicle gross profit | $ | 874 |  | 16.2 |  | $ | 849 |  | 16.3 |  | $ | 960 |  | 17.4 |  | $ | 913 |  | 17.0 |
Other gross profit | $ | 440 |  | 81.4 |  | $ | 459 |  | 88.4 |  | $ | 429 |  | 83.5 |  | $ | 433 |  | 87.0 |
Total gross profit | $ | 3,176 |  | 12.9 |  | $ | 3,172 |  | 13.4 |  | $ | 3,227 |  | 13.1 |  | $ | 3,197 |  | 13.5 |

(1)Calculated as category gross profit divided by each category’s respective units sold, except the other and total categories, which are calculated by dividing their respective gross profit by total retail units sold.

(2)Calculated as a percentage of its respective sales or revenue.

Used Vehicle Gross Profit. Used vehicle gross profit increased 6.2% in the second quarter and 8.1% in the first half of fiscal 2015. In both periods, the improvement was driven by corresponding increases in used unit sales. Used vehicle gross profit

Page 29

per unit was consistent year-over-year in both the second quarter and the first half of the fiscal year. We have been able to manage to a relatively consistent gross profit per used unit over the last several years.

Wholesale Vehicle Gross Profit. W holesale vehicle gross profit increased 10.5% in the second quarter of fiscal 2015 driven by the combination of the 7.4% increase in wholesale unit sales and an improvement in wholesale vehicle gross profit per unit, which rose 2.9%, or $25 per unit.

Wholesale gross profit increased 14.2% in the first half of fiscal 2015. The improvement was driven by the combination of the 8.6% increase in wholesale unit sales and an improvement in wholesale vehicle gross profit per unit, which rose 5.1%, or $47 per unit. The strong industry wholesale pricing in the spring of calendar year 2014 contributed to the improvement in wholesale gross profit per unit.

Other Gross Profit. Other gross profit includes profits related to EPP revenues, net third-party finance fees and service department operations, including used vehicle reconditioning. We have no cost of sales related to E P P revenues or net third-party finance fees, as these represent commissions paid to us by certain third-party providers. Third-party finance fees are reported net of the fees we pay to third-party subprime finance providers. Accordingly, changes in the relative mix of the other gross profit components can affect the composition and amount of total other gross profit.

Other gross profit rose 2.0% in the second quarter and 7.4% in the first half of fiscal 2015. In both periods, the increase in other gross profits reflected the improvement in net third-party finance fees, partially offset by the decline in EPP revenues and a decrease in service department gross profits. Service department gross profits were adversely affected by our modest comparable store used unit sales growth in both the se cond quarter and first half of fiscal 2015 and the resulting deleverage of service overhead costs.

Impact of Inflation. Historically, inflation has not had a significant impact on results. Profitability is primarily affected by our ability to achieve targeted unit sales and gross profit dollars per vehicle rather than by changes in average retail prices. However, increases in average vehicle selling prices benefit CAF income, to the extent the average amount financed also increases.

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses

Components of SG&A Expense

| Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended
| August 31 | August 31
(In millions, except per unit data) | 2014 | 2013 | Change | 2014 | 2013 | Change
Compensation and benefits (1) | $ | 181.5 |  | $ | 160.9 |  |  | 12.8 | % | $ | 360.5 |  | $ | 333.0 |  |  | 8.3 | %
Store occupancy costs |  | 60.0 |  |  | 54.5 |  |  | 10.1 | % |  | 118.3 |  |  | 107.0 |  |  | 10.6 | %
Advertising expense |  | 29.4 |  |  | 26.5 |  |  | 10.9 | % |  | 60.1 |  |  | 53.6 |  |  | 12.1 | %
Other overhead costs (2) |  | 26.7 |  |  | 41.3 |  |  | (35.4) | % |  | 72.2 |  |  | 79.8 |  |  | (9.5) | %
Total SG&A expenses | $ | 297.6 |  | $ | 283.2 |  |  | 5.1 | % | $ | 611.1 |  | $ | 573.4 |  |  | 6.6 | %
SG&A per unit | $ | 2,040 |  | $ | 2,067 |  | $ | (27) |  | $ | 2,044 |  | $ | 2,076 |  | $ | (32) |

(1)Ex cludes compensation and benefits related to reconditioning and vehicle repair service, which is included in cost of sales.

(2)Includes IT expenses, insurance, non-CAF bad debt, travel, preopening and relocation costs, charitable contributions and other administrative expenses. Costs for the three and six months ended August 31, 2014, were reduced by $20.9 million in connection with the receipt of settlement proceeds in a class action lawsuit.

SG&A expenses increased 5.1% in the second quarter of fiscal 201 5. SG&A for the three and six months ended August 31, 2014 was reduced by $20.9 million, which represented our receipt of settlement proceeds in a class action lawsuit related to the economic loss associated with certain Toyota vehicles. Excluding this item, second quarter SG&A expenses increased 12.5% year-over-year, primarily due to the 15% increase in our store base since the beginning of the second quarter of fiscal 2014 (representing the addition of 18 stores), as well as a $6.4 million increase in share-based compensation expense. Excluding the settlement gain, SG&A per retail unit for the second quarter rose $116 to $2,183.

Page 30

SG&A expenses increased 6.6% in the first half of fiscal 2015. Excluding the settlement gain, SG&A increased 10.2%. Similar to the second quarter, the increase reflected higher variable costs associated with the growth in our store base, which increased 18%, from 118 used car stores as of the beginning of fiscal 2014 to 139 stores as of August 31, 2014. For the first half of the fiscal year, share-based compensation expense was flat at $35.2 million. Excluding the settlement gain, SG&A per retail unit for the first half of the year rose $37 to $2,113.

Income Taxes. Our effective income tax rate was 3 8.4% in the second quarter of fiscal 201 5 and 38.3% in the first half of fiscal 2015 versus 3 8.2% in both the second quarter and first half of fiscal 2014.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS – CARMAX AUTO FINANCE INCOME

CAF provides financing to qualified customers purchasing vehicles at CarMax. Because the purchase of a vehicle is generally reliant on the consumer’s ability to obtain on-the-spot financing, it is important to our business that financing be available to creditworthy customers. While financing can also be obtained from third-party sources, we believe that total reliance on third parties can create unacceptable volatility and business risk. Furthermore, we believe the company’s processes and systems, transparency of pricing, vehicle quality and the integrity of the information collected at the time the customer applies for credit provide a unique and ideal environment in which to procure high quality auto loans, both for CAF and for the third-party finance providers.

We believe CAF enables us to capture additional sales, profits and cash flows while managing our reliance on third-party finance sources. Management regularly analyzes CAF's operating results by assessing the competitiveness of our consumer offer, profitability, the performance of the auto loan receivables including trends in credit losses and delinquencies, and CAF direct expenses.

CAF income primarily reflects the interest and fee income generated by the auto loan receivables less the interest expense associated with the debt issued to fund these receivables, a provision for estimated loan losses and direct CAF expenses. CAF income does not include any allocation of indirect costs. Although CAF benefits from certain indirect overhead expenditures, we present this information on a direct basis to avoid making subjective decisions regarding the indirect benefits or costs that could be attributed to CAF. Examples of indirect costs not allocated to CAF include retail store expenses and corporate expenses such as human resources, administrative services, marketing, information systems, accounting, legal, treasury and executive payroll.

Components of CAF Income

| Three Months Ended August 31 |  | Six Months Ended August 31
(In millions) | 2014 | % (1) | 2013 | % (1) |  | 2014 | % (1) | 2013 | % (1)
Interest margin: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Interest and fee income |  | $ | 150.7 |  | 7.8 |  | $ | 137.2 |  | 8.4 |  | $ | 297.6 |  | 7.9 |  | $ | 270.7 |  | 8.5
Interest expense |  |  | (23.9) |  | (1.2) |  |  | (22.6) |  | (1.4) |  |  | (47.0) |  | (1.2) |  |  | (45.4) |  | (1.4)
Total interest margin |  |  | 126.8 |  | 6.6 |  |  | 114.6 |  | 7.0 |  |  | 250.6 |  | 6.6 |  |  | 225.3 |  | 7.1
Provision for loan losses |  |  | (20.4) |  | (1.1) |  |  | (18.0) |  | (1.1) |  |  | (36.2) |  | (1.0) |  |  | (29.3) |  | (0.9)
Total interest margin after |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
provision for loan losses |  |  | 106.4 |  | 5.5 |  |  | 96.6 |  | 5.9 |  |  | 214.4 |  | 5.7 |  |  | 196.0 |  | 6.2
Other income |  |  | ― |  | ― |  |  | 0.1 |  | ― |  |  | ― |  | ― |  |  | 0.1 |  | ―
Direct expenses: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Payroll and fringe benefit expense |  |  | (6.3) |  | (0.3) |  |  | (5.6) |  | (0.3) |  |  | (12.5) |  | (0.3) |  |  | (11.1) |  | (0.4)
Other direct expenses |  |  | (7.5) |  | (0.4) |  |  | (6.7) |  | (0.4) |  |  | (14.7) |  | (0.4) |  |  | (13.6) |  | (0.4)
Total direct expenses |  |  | (13.8) |  | (0.7) |  |  | (12.3) |  | (0.7) |  |  | (27.2) |  | (0.7) |  |  | (24.7) |  | (0.8)
CarMax Auto Finance income |  | $ | 92.6 |  | 4.8 |  | $ | 84.4 |  | 5.2 |  | $ | 187.2 |  | 5.0 |  | $ | 171.4 |  | 5.4
Total average managed receivables |  | $ | 7,724.5 |  |  |  | $ | 6,516.3 |  |  |  | $ | 7,557.3 |  |  |  | $ | 6,334.4 |  |

Page 31

(1)Annualized percent age of total average managed receivables.

CAF Origination Information

| Three Months Ended August 31 | Six Months Ended August 31
| 2014 (1) | 2013 (1) | 2014 (1) | 2013 (1)
Net loans originated (in millions) |  | $ | 1,165.3 |  | $ | 1,088.0 |  | $ | 2,401.7 |  | $ | 2,208.2 |  |
Vehicle units financed |  |  | 59,412 |  |  | 56,783 |  |  | 122,603 |  |  | 114,445 |  |
Penetration rate (2) |  |  | 40.7 | % |  | 41.4 | % |  | 41.0 | % |  | 41.4 | % |
Weighted average contract rate |  |  | 7.0 | % |  | 6.8 | % |  | 7.1 | % |  | 6.9 | % |
Weighted average credit score (3) |  |  | 703 |  |  | 704 |  |  | 701 |  |  | 702 |  |
Weighted average loan-to-value (LTV) (4) |  |  | 94.1 | % |  | 93.8 | % |  | 93.7 | % |  | 93.6 | % |
Weighted average term (in months) |  |  | 65.2 |  |  | 65.6 |  |  | 65.3 |  |  | 65.7 |  |

(1)All information relates to all receivables originated by CAF net of estimated 3-day payoffs and vehicle returns.

(2)Vehicle units financed as a percentage of total retail units sold.

(3)The credit scores represent FICO scores, and r eflect only receivables with obligors that have a FICO score at the time of application. The FICO score with respect to any receivable with co-obligors is calculated as the average of each obligor’s FICO score at the time of application. FICO scores are not a significant factor in our prim ary scoring model which relies o n information from credit bureaus and other application information as discussed in N ote 4. FICO® is a federally registered servicemark of Fair Isaac Corporation.

(4)LTV represents the ratio of the amount financed to the total collateral value, which is measured as the vehicle selling price plus applicable taxes, title and fees.

CAF income increased 9.7% in the second quarter and 9.2% in the first half of fiscal 2015. In both periods, the improvement resulted from the growth in CAF’s average managed receivables, partially offset by a lower total interest margin rate.

CAF’s average managed receivables increased 18.5% in the second quarter and 19.3% in the first half of fiscal 2015, driven by the rise in CAF loan originations in recent years. Net loans originated increased 7.1% to $1.17 billion in the second quarter and 8.8% to $2.40 billion in the first half of the year. The growth in net originations was similar to the increase in our total retail unit sales.

In January 2014, CAF launched a test to originate loans for customers who typically would be financed by our third-party subprime providers. We plan to originate approximately $70 million of loans in this test, and as of August 31, 2014, we had originated $44.4 million. We expect the loans originated in this test will have higher loss and delinquency rates compared with the remainder of the CAF portfolio. The test is being funded separately from our current portfolio and is not included in our current securitization program.

The effect of the increase in managed receivables on CAF income was partially offset by a lower total interest margin rate, which declined to 6.6% of average managed receivables in both the second quarter and first half of fiscal 2015 compared with 7.0% and 7.1%, in the respective prior year periods. The interest margin reflects the spread between interest and fees charged to consumers and our funding costs. While the weighted average contract rate on loan originations rose slightly in both the second quarter and first half of fiscal 2015 compared to prior year periods, the current rate is below that experienced in recent years, largely reflecting competitive conditions and c ontinued low fu nding costs. Changes in the interest margin on new originations affect CAF income over time as these loans come to represent an increasing percentage of managed receivables. Rising interest rates, which affect CAF’s funding costs, or further competitive pressure on consumer rates could result in further compression in the interest margin on new originations.

The provision for loan losses is the periodic expense of maintaining an adequate allowance for loan losses. The provision for loan losses as a percentage of average managed receivables was comparable to the respective prior period in both the second quarter and the first half of fiscal 2015, reflecting both overall stability in the credit quality of originations during the last three years and a relatively consistent economic environment.

Allowance for Loan Losses

|  |  | Three Months Ended August 31 |  | Six Months Ended August 31 |
(In millions) |  |  | 2014 |  | % (1) |  |  | 2013 |  | % (1) |  |  | 2014 |  | % (1) |  |  | 2013 |  | % (1) |

Page 32

Balance as of beginning of period |  | $ | 75.4 |  | 1.00 |  | $ | 60.9 |  | 0.96 |  | $ | 69.9 |  | 0.97 |  | $ | 57.3 |  | 0.97 |
Charge-offs |  |  | (36.9) |  |  |  |  | (31.8) |  |  |  |  | (68.9) |  |  |  |  | (58.2) |  |  |
Recoveries |  |  | 18.9 |  |  |  |  | 18.8 |  |  |  |  | 40.6 |  |  |  |  | 37.5 |  |  |
Provision for loan losses |  |  | 20.4 |  |  |  |  | 18.0 |  |  |  |  | 36.2 |  |  |  |  | 29.3 |  |  |
Balance as of end of period |  | $ | 77.8 |  | 0.99 |  | $ | 65.9 |  | 0.99 |  | $ | 77.8 |  | 0.99 |  | $ | 65.9 |  | 0.99 |

(1)Percent age of total ending managed receivables as of the corresponding reporting date.

The allowance for loan losses represents an estimate of the amount of net losses inherent in our portfolio of managed receivables as of the applicable reporting date and anticipated to occur during the following 12 months. The allowance is primarily based on the credit quality of the underlying receivables, historical loss trends and forecasted forward loss curves. We consider recent trends in delinquencies and losses, recovery rates and the economic environment in determining the adequacy of the allowance. The increase in the dollar amount of the allowance largely reflected the growth in managed receivables. Over the course of the last two fiscal years, the allowance for loan losses as a percentage of ending managed receivables has been consistent at approximately 1.0%.

Past Due Account Information

| As of August 31 | As of February 28
(In millions) | 2014 | 2013 | 2014 | 2013
Accounts 31+ days past due |  | $ | 220.0 |  | $ | 178.5 |  | $ | 185.2 |  | $ | 154.2 |  |
Ending managed receivables |  | $ | 7,891.0 |  | $ | 6,683.1 |  | $ | 7,184.4 |  | $ | 5,933.3 |  |
Past due accounts as a percentage of ending |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
managed receivables |  |  | 2.79 | % |  | 2.67 | % |  | 2.58 | % |  | 2.60 | % |

Credit Loss Information

| Three Months Ended August 31 | Six Months Ended August 31
(In millions) | 2014 | 2013 | 2014 | 2013
Net credit losses on managed receivables |  | $ | 18.0 |  | $ | 13.0 |  | $ | 28.3 |  | $ | 20.7 |  |
Total average managed receivables |  | $ | 7,724.5 |  | $ | 6,516.3 |  | $ | 7,557.3 |  | $ | 6,334.4 |  |
Annualized net credit losses as a percentage of |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
total average managed receivables |  |  | 0.93 | % |  | 0.79 | % |  | 0.75 | % |  | 0.65 | % |
Average recovery rate |  |  | 54.7 | % |  | 55.5 | % |  | 57.1 | % |  | 57.3 | % |

Delinquency and loss rates will vary from quarter to quarter, reflecting normal seasonal patterns.

The average recovery rate represents the average percentage of the outstanding principal balance we receive when a vehicle is repossessed and liquidated, generally at our wholesale auctions. The annual recovery rate has ranged from a low of 42% to a high of 60%, and it is primarily affected by changes in the wholesale market pricing environment.

PLANNED FUTURE ACTIVITIES

Planned Store Openings. We plan to open a total of 1 3 s tores in fiscal 201 5 and between 10 and 15 s tores in each of the following two fiscal years. We currently estimate capital expendit ures will total approximately $3 00 mil lion in fiscal 201 5.

We currently plan to open the following s tores within 12 months from August 31, 2014:

Location | Television Market | Market Status | Planned Opening Date
Beaverton, Oregon | Portland | Existing | Q3 Fiscal 2015
Saltillo, Mississippi | Tupelo | New | Q3 Fiscal 2015

Page 33

Reno, Nevada | Reno | New | Q3 Fiscal 2015
Raleigh, North Carolina | Raleigh | Existing | Q3 Fiscal 2015
Warrensville Heights, Ohio | Cleveland | New | Q4 Fiscal 2015
Brooklyn Park, Minnesota | Minneapolis/St Paul | New | Q1 Fiscal 2016
Sicklerville, New Jersey | Philadelphia | Existing | Q1 Fiscal 2016
Gainesville, Florida | Gainesville | New | Q1 Fiscal 2016
Cranston, Rhode Island | Providence | Existing | Q2 Fiscal 2016
Parker, Colorado | Denver | Existing | Q2 Fiscal 2016
Loveland, Colorado | Denver | Existing | Q2 Fiscal 2016
Tallahassee, Florida | Tallahassee | New | Q2 Fiscal 2016
Richmond, Texas | Houston | Existing | Q2 Fiscal 2016

Normal construction, permitting or other scheduling delays could shift the opening dates of any of these stores into a later period.

FINANCIAL CONDITION

Liquidity and Capital Resources.

Our primary ongoing cash requirements are to fund our existing operations, new store expansion (including capital expenditures and inventory purchases) and CAF. Since fiscal 2013, we have elected to use cash to repurchase stock as part of our share repurchase program, which has reduced the cash and cash equivalents we hold. Our primary ongoing sources of liquidity include existing cash balances, funds generated through operations, proceeds from securitization transactions or other funding arrangements, and borrowings under our revolving credit facility.

Operating Activities. During the first half of the fiscal year, net cash used in operating activities totaled $436.6 million in fiscal 2015 versus $263.6 million in fiscal 2014. These amounts include increases in auto loan receivables of $732.6 million and $799.4 million, respectively. The majority of the increases in auto loan receivables are accompanied by increases in non-recourse notes payable, which are separately reflected as cash provided by financing activities. Excluding the increases in auto loan receivables, net cash provided by operating activities would have been $296.0 million in the first half of fiscal 201 5 versus $535.8 million in the first half of fiscal 201 4, with the decrease primarily driven by changes in inventory.

As of August 31, 2014, total inventory was $1.71 billion, representing an increase of $67.5 million, or 4.1%, compared with the balance at the start of fiscal 2015. The increase primarily reflected new stores opened during the first half of the fiscal year. Compared with August 31, 2013, inventor y increased $344.9 million, or 2 5.3%, reflecting inventory added to support the 1 6 new stores opened since that date, and a deliberate increase in inventory at existing stores. In the first half of the prior year, inventor y declined $1 53.8 million, or 10.1%, compared with the start of fiscal 2014 primarily reflecting a return to more normal inventory levels after having built inventory in the latter portion of fiscal 2013 to better position the company for seasonal sales opportunities.

Investing Activities. During the first half of the fiscal year, net cash used in investing activities totaled $183.8 million in fiscal 201 5 compared with $148.7 million in fiscal 201 4. Capital expenditures were similar at $135.3 million in fiscal 201 5 versus $136.0 million in the prior year period. Capital expenditures primarily include real estate acquisitions for planned future store openings and store construction costs. We maintain a multi-year pipeline of sites to support our store growth, so portions of capital spending in any one year may relate to store s that we plan to open in subsequent fiscal years. After ramping store growth in recent years, our store opening pace has become more consistent, with 13 stores opened in fiscal 2014, 13 stores planned for fiscal 2015, and 10 to 15 stores planned for each of the following 2 fiscal years.

Historically, capital expenditures have been funded with internally generated funds, debt and sale-leaseback transactions. No sale-leasebacks have been completed since fiscal 2009.

As of August 31, 2014, we owned 82 and leased 57 of our 1 39 used car locations.

During the first half of the fiscal year, restricted cash from collections on auto loan receivables increased $37.8 million in fiscal 2015 versus a $27.1 million increase in fiscal 2014. These collections vary depending on the timing of the receipt of principal

Page 34

and interest payments on securitized auto loan receivables, the change in average managed receivables and the funding vehicle utilized.

Financing Activities. During the first half of the fiscal year, net cash provided by financing activities totaled $347.1 million in fiscal 201 5 compared with $713.0 million in fiscal 201 4. Included in these amounts were net increases in total non-recourse notes payable of $660.3 million and $875.3 million, respectively, which were used to provide the financing for the majority of the increases of $732.6 million and $799.4 million, respectively, in auto loan receivables. During the first six months of the fiscal year, cash provided by financing activities was reduced by $373.4 million of stock repurchases and retirements in fiscal 2015, versus $179.3 million in fiscal 2014.

Total Debt and Cash and Cash Equivalents

| As of August 31 |  | As of February 28
(In thousands) | 2014 |  | 2014
Borrowings under revolving credit facility | $ | 2,229 |  | $ | 582
Finance and capital lease obligations |  | 330,969 |  |  | 334,384
Non-recourse notes payable |  | 7,908,709 |  |  | 7,248,444
Total debt | $ | 8,241,907 |  | $ | 7,583,410
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 354,600 |  | $ | 627,901

We have a $700 million unsecured revolving credit facility, which expires in August 2016. Borrowings under this credit facility are available for working capital and general corporate purposes, and the unused portion is fully available to us. See Note 10 for additional information on t he revolving credit facility agreement.

The credit facility agreement contains representations and warranties, conditions and covenants. If these requirements were not met, all amounts outstanding or otherwise owed could become due and payable immediately and other limitations could be placed on our ability to use any available borrowing capacity.

CAF auto loan receivables are primarily funded through securitization transactions. Our securitizations are structured to legally isolate the auto loan receivables, and we would not expect to be able to access the assets of our securitization vehicles, even in insolvency, receivership or conservatorship proceedings. Similarly, the investors in the non-recourse notes payable have no recourse to our assets beyond the securitized receivables, the amounts on deposit in reserve accounts and the restricted cash from collections on auto loan receivables. We do, however, continue to have the rights associated with the interest we retain in these securitization vehicles. Loans originated in the previously announced CAF loan origination test are being funded using existing working capital.

The timing of principal payments on the non-recourse notes payable is based on principal collections, net of losses, on the securitized auto loan receivables. The current portion of the non-recourse notes payable represents principal payments that are due to be distributed in the following period.

As of August 31, 2014, $6.86 billion of non-recourse notes payable w as outstanding related to term securitizations. These notes payable accrue interest at fixed rates and have scheduled mat urities throug h February 2021, but may mature earlier or later, depending on the repayment rate of the underlying auto loan receivables. During the first half of fiscal 2015, we completed two term securitizations, funding a total of $1.99 billion of auto loan receivables.

As of August 31, 2014, $1.04 b illion of non-recourse notes payable was outstanding related to our warehouse facilities. The combined warehouse facility limit was $2.1 billion, and unused warehouse capacity totaled $1.06 b illion. In July 2014, we increased the combined limit of our warehouse facilities by an additional $300 million. During the second quarter of fiscal 2015, we renewed our $800 million warehouse facility that was scheduled to expire in August 2014 for an additional 364-day term. Of the combined warehouse facility limit, $1.3 billion will expire in February 2015 and $800 million will expire in July 2 015. The return requirements of the warehouse facility investors could fluctuate significantly depending on market conditions. At renewal, the cost, structure and capacity of the facilities could change. These changes could have a significant impact on our funding costs. See Notes 2 and 10 for additional information on the warehouse facilities.

The securitization agreements related to the warehouse facilities include various representations and warranties, covenants and performance triggers. If these requirements are not met, we could be unable to continue to securitize receivables through the warehouse facilities. In addition, the warehouse facility investors could charge us a higher rate of interest and could have us

Page 35

replaced as servicer. Further, we could be required to deposit collections on the securitized receivables with the warehouse facility agents on a daily basis and deliver executed lockbox agreements to the warehouse facility agents.

We expect that cash generated by operations and proceeds from securitization transactions or other funding arrangements, sale-leaseback transactions and borrowings under existing, new or expanded credit facilities will be sufficient to fund CAF, capital expenditures and working capital for the foreseeable future. We anticipate that we will be able to enter into new, or renew or expand existing, funding arrangements to meet our future funding needs. However, based on conditions in the credit markets, the cost for these arrangements could be materially higher than historical levels and the timing and capacity of these transactions could be dictated by market availability rather than our requirements.

In fiscal 2013, our board of directors authorized the repurchase of up to $800 million of our common stock, and on April 4, 2014, we announced that they had authorized the repurchase of up to an additional $1 billion of our common stock, which expires on December 31, 2015.

During the six months ended August 31, 2014, we repurchased 7,866,740 shares of common stock at an average purchase pric e of $47.68 per share. During the six months ended August 31, 2013, we repurchased 3,992,251 shares of common stock at an average purchase price of $43.40 per share. As of August 31, 2014, $907.0 million was available for repurchase unde r the authorization, which expires on December 31, 2015. Amounts reported as the repurchase and retirement of common stock on our statement of cash flows may reflect timing differences in trade and settlement dates on stock repurchase transactions occurring at the end of a reporting period.

Fair Value Measurements. We report money market securities, mutual fund investments and derivative instruments at fair value. See Note 6 for more information on fair value measurements.

Page 36

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

We caution readers that the statements contained in this report about our future business plans, operations, opportunities, or prospects, including without limitation any statements or factors regarding expected sales, margins, expenditure s, CAF income, or earnings, are forward-looking statements made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Liti gation Reform Act of 1995. Such forward-looking statements are based upon management’s current knowledge and assumptions about future events and involve risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from anticipated results. We disclaim any intent or obligation to update these statements. Among the factors that could cause actual results and outcomes to differ materially from those contained in the forward-looking statements are the following:

| § |  | Changes in the competitive landscape and/or our failure to successfully adjust to such changes.

| § |  | Changes in general or regional U.S. economic conditions.

| § |  | Changes in the availability or cost of capital and working capital financing, including changes related to the asset-backed securitization market.

| § |  | Changes in the attractiveness or availability of consumer credit provided by our third-party financing providers.

| § |  | Events that damage our reputation or harm the perception of the quality of our brand.

| § |  | Our inability to recruit, develop and retain associates and maintain positive associate relations.

| § |  | The loss of key associates from our store, regional or corporate management teams or a significant increase in labor costs.

| § |  | Security breaches or other events that result in the misappropriation, loss or other unauthorized disclosure of confidential customer or associate information.

| § |  | Significant changes in prices of new and used vehicles.

| § |  | A reduction in the availability of or access to sources of inventory or a failure to expeditiously liquidate inventory.

| § |  | Factors related to the regulatory and legislative environment in which we operate.

| § |  | Factors related to geographic growth, including the inability to acquire or lease suitable real estate at favorable terms or to effectively manage our growth.

| § |  | The failure of key information systems.

| § |  | The effect of various litigation matters.

| § |  | Adverse conditions affecting one or more automotive manufacturers, and manufacturer recalls.

| § |  | The inaccuracy of estimates and assumptions used in the preparation of our financial statements, or the effect of new accounting requirements or changes to U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

| § |  | Factors related to the seasonal fluctuations in our business.

| § |  | The occurrence of severe weather events.

| § |  | Factors related to the geographic concentration of our store s.

For more details on factors that could affect expectations, see Part II, Item 1A, “Risk Factors” on Page 3 9 of t his report, our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended February 28, 2014, and our quarterly or current reports as filed with or furnished to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Our filings are publicly available on our investor information home page at investor.carmax.com. Requests for information may also be made to our Investor Relations Department by email to investor_relations@carmax.com or by calling 1-804-747-0422, ext. 4391. We undertake no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements after the date they are made, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

Page 37

Item 3.Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

There have been no material changes to our market risk since February 28, 2014. For information on our exposure to market risk, refer to Part II, Item 7A, “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk,” contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended February 28, 2014.

Item 4.Controls and Procedures

Disclosure. We maintain disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”)) that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. Our disclosure controls and procedures are also designed to ensure that this information is accumulated and communicated to management, including the chief executive officer (“CEO”) and the chief financial officer (“CFO”), as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

As of the end of the period covered by this report, with the participation of the CEO and CFO, we evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures. Based upon that evaluation, the CEO and CFO concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the period.

Internal Control over Financial Reporting. There was no change in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act) that occurred during the quarter ended August 31, 2014, that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

Page 38

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.Legal Proceedings

For a discussion of legal proceedings, see Note 14 to the consolidated financial statements included in Part I, Item 1 of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

Item 1A.Risk Factors

In connection with information set forth in this Form 10-Q, the factors discussed under “Risk Factors” in our Form 10-K for fiscal year ended February 28, 2014, should be considered. These risks could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations. There have been no material changes to the factors discussed in our Form 10‑K.

Item 2.Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

In fiscal 2013, our board of directors authorized the repurchase of up to $800 million of our common stock, and on April 4, 2014, we announced that they had authorized the repurchase of up to an additional $1 billion of our common stock. During the quarter ended August 31, 2014, we exhausted the initial $800 million authorization and, as of August 31, 2014, $907.0 m illion was available for repurchase unde r the $1 billion authorization, which expires on December 31, 2015. Purchases may be made in open market or privately negotiated transactions at management’s discretion and the timing and amount of repurchases are determined based on share price, market conditions, legal requirements and other factors. Shares repurchased are deemed authorized but unissued shares of common stock.

The following table provides information relating to the company’s repurcha se of common stock for the second quarter of fiscal 2015. The table does not include transactions related to employee equity awards or the exercises of employee stock options.

|  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Approximate
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Dollar Value
|  |  |  |  |  | Total Number |  | of Shares that
|  |  | Total Number | Average | of Shares Purchased |  | May Yet Be
|  |  | of Shares | Price Paid | as Part of Publicly |  | Purchased Under
Period | Purchased | per Share | Announced Program |  | the Program
June 1-30, 2014 | 1,135,592 | $ | 46.87 | 1,135,592 | $ | 1,054,707,713
July 1-31, 2014 | 1,467,979 | $ | 51.52 | 1,467,979 | $ | 979,078,505
August 1-31, 2014 | 1,421,230 | $ | 50.71 | 1,421,230 | $ | 907,005,324
Total |  |  | 4,024,801 |  |  | 4,024,801 |  |

Page 39

Item 6.Exhibits

10.1 Form of Notice of Restricted Stock Grant between CarMax, Inc. and certain non-employee directors of the CarMax, Inc. board of directors, filed herewith.

31.1 Certification of the Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a), filed herewith.

31.2 Certification of the Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a), filed herewith.

32.1 Certification of the Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, filed herewith.

32.2 Certification of the Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, filed herewith.

101.INS XBRL Instance Document

101.SCH XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document

101.CAL XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document

101.DEF XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document

101.LAB XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document

101.PRE XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

Page 40

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

| CARMAX, INC.
| By: | /s/ Thomas J. Folliard
|  | Thomas J. Folliard
|  | President and
|  | Chief Executive Officer
| By: | /s/ Thomas W. Reedy
|  | Thomas W. Reedy
|  | Executive Vice President and
|  | Chief Financial Officer

October 8, 2014

Page 41

EXHIBIT INDEX

10.1 Form of Notice of Restricted Stock Grant between CarMax, Inc. and certain non-employee directors of the CarMax, Inc. board of directors, filed herewith.

31.1 Certification of the Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a), filed herewith.

31.2 Certification of the Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a), filed herewith.

32.1 Certification of the Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, filed herewith.

32.2 Certification of the Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, filed herewith.

101.INS XBRL Instance Document

101.SCH XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document

101.CAL XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document

101.DEF XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document

101.LAB XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document

101.PRE XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

Page 42