v2.4.0.6
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
6 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2012
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies  
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

3.    Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

 

Revenue Recognition

 

Revenues are principally earned from long-term contractual agreements to provide online curriculum, books, materials, computers and management services to virtual and blended public schools, traditional schools, school districts, public charter schools, and private schools. In addition to providing the curriculum, books and materials, under its contracts, the Company provides management services to virtual and blended public schools, including monitoring academic achievement, recommendations related to teacher hiring and training and compensation of school personnel, financial management, enrollment processing and procurement of curriculum, equipment and required services. The schools receive funding on a per student basis from the state in which the public school or school district is located. Shipments for schools that occur in the fourth fiscal quarter and for the upcoming school year are recorded in deferred revenues.

 

Where the Company has determined that it is the primary obligor for substantially all expenses under these contracts, the Company records the associated per student revenue received by the school from its state funding school district up to the expenses incurred in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 605, Revenue Recognition. For contracts where the Company is not the primary obligor, the Company records revenue based on its net fees earned under the contractual agreement.

 

The Company generates revenues under contracts with virtual and blended public schools which include multiple elements. These elements include providing each school’s students with access to the Company’s online school and the component of lessons; offline learning kits, which include books and materials to supplement the online lessons; in certain cases may include the use of a personal computer and associated reclamation services; internet access and technology support services; the services of a state-certified teacher; and management and technology services required to operate a virtual public or blended school.  In certain managed school contracts, revenue is determined directly by per enrollment funding. Revenue is generally recognized ratably over the period services are performed except for revenue on materials that is recognized upon shipment to students and the costs of materials are expensed.

 

The Company has determined that the elements of its contracts are valuable to schools in combination, but do not have standalone value. As a result, the elements within the Company’s multiple-element contracts do not qualify for separate units of accounting. Accordingly, the Company accounts for revenues under multiple element arrangements as a single unit of accounting and recognizes the entire arrangement based upon the approximate rate at which it incurs the costs associated with each element.

 

Under the contracts where the Company provides turnkey management services to schools, the Company has generally agreed to absorb any operating losses of the schools. These school operating losses represent the excess of costs incurred over revenues earned by the virtual or blended public school as reflected on its respective financial statements, including Company charges to the schools. A school operating loss in one year does not necessarily mean the Company anticipates losing money on the entire contract with the school. However, a school operating loss may reduce the Company’s ability to collect its fees in full and recognized revenues are reduced accordingly to reflect the expected cash collections from such schools. The Company amortizes the estimated school operating loss against its management fees based upon the percentage of actual revenues in the period to total estimated revenues for the fiscal year. Management periodically reviews its estimates of full year school revenues and operating expenses and amortizes the net impact of any changes to these estimates over the remainder of the fiscal year. Actual school operating losses may vary from these estimates or revisions, and the impact of these differences could have a material impact on results of operations. Since the end of the school year coincides with the end of the Company’s fiscal year, annual revenues are generally based on actual school revenues and actual costs incurred in the calculation of school operating losses.

 

The Company provides certain online curriculum and services to schools and school districts under subscription and perpetual license agreements. Revenue under these agreements is recognized in accordance with ASC 605 when all of the following conditions are met: there is persuasive evidence of an arrangement; delivery has occurred or services have been rendered; the amount of fees to be paid by the customer is fixed and determinable; and the collectability of the fee is probable. Revenue from the licensing of curriculum under subscription arrangements is recognized on a ratable basis over the subscription period. Revenue from the licensing of curriculum under non-cancelable perpetual arrangements is recognized when all revenue recognition criteria have been met. Revenue from professional consulting, training and support services are deferred and recognized ratably over the service period.

 

Other revenues are generated from individual customers who prepay and have access for 12 to 24 months to Company-provided online curriculum. The Company recognizes these revenues pro rata over the maximum term of the customer contract. Revenues from associated offline learning kits are recognized upon shipment.

 

During the three months ended December 31, 2012, the Company had contracts with two schools that represented approximately 14% and 11% of revenues. During the three months ended December 31, 2011, the Company had contracts with two schools that each represented approximately 8% of revenues. The percentage of revenues for these two schools is not indicative of the percentage of revenues for the full year. Approximately 8% and 11% of accounts receivable was attributable to a contract with one school as of December 31, 2012 and June 30, 2012, respectively. During the six months ended December 31, 2012, the Company had contracts with two schools that represented approximately 14% and 10% of revenues. During the six months ended December 31, 2011, the Company had contracts with two schools that each represented approximately 8% of revenues.

 

Reclassifications

 

The Company has reclassified certain prior year enrollment related costs from instructional costs and services to selling administrative and other operating expenses to conform to the current year presentation.  There was no effect on total costs and expenses, income from operations or net income from such reclassification.

 

Consolidation

 

The condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company, its wholly-owned and affiliated companies that the Company owns, directly or indirectly, and all controlled subsidiaries. All significant intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation.

 

Inventories

 

Inventories consist primarily of textbooks and curriculum materials, a majority of which are supplied to virtual public schools and blended public schools and utilized directly by students. Inventories represent items that are purchased and held for sale and are recorded at the lower of cost (first-in, first-out method) or market value. Excess and obsolete inventory reserves are established based upon the evaluation of the quantity on hand relative to demand. The excess and obsolete inventory reserve was $4.7 million and $4.5 million at December 31, 2012 and June 30, 2012, respectively

 

Other Current Assets

 

Other current assets consist primarily of textbooks, curriculum materials and other supplies which are expected to be returned upon the completion of the school year. Materials not returned are expensed as part of instructional costs and services.

 

Property and Equipment

 

Property, equipment and capitalized software development costs are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation and amortization. Depreciation expense is calculated using the straight-line method over the estimated useful life of the asset (or the lesser of the term of the lease and the estimated useful life of the asset under capital lease). Amortization of assets capitalized under capital lease arrangements is included in depreciation expense. Leasehold improvements are amortized over the lesser of the lease term or the estimated useful life of the asset. The Company determines the lease term in accordance with ASC 840, Leases, as the fixed non-cancelable term of the lease plus all periods for which failure to renew the lease imposes a penalty on the lessee in an amount such that renewal appears, at the inception of the lease, to be reasonably assured. Property and equipment are depreciated over the following useful lives:

 

 

 

Useful Life

 

Student computers

 

3 years

 

Computer hardware

 

3 years

 

Computer software

 

3-5 years

 

Web site development costs

 

3 years

 

Office equipment

 

5 years

 

Furniture and fixtures

 

7 years

 

Leasehold improvements

 

3-12 years

 

 

Capitalized Software

 

The Company develops software for internal use. Software development costs incurred during the application development stage are capitalized in accordance with ASC 350, Intangibles — Goodwill and Other. The Company amortizes these costs over the estimated useful life of the software, which is generally three years. Capitalized software development costs are stated at cost less accumulated amortization.

 

Capitalized software development additions totaled $11.6 million and $8.6 million for the six months ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively.  Amortization expense for the three months ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 was $3.4 million and $3.1 million, respectively.  Amortization expense for the six months ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 was $6.7 million and $5.8 million, respectively.

 

Capitalized Curriculum Development Costs

 

The Company internally develops its own curriculum, which is primarily provided as online content and accessed via the Internet. The Company also creates textbooks and other materials that are complementary to online content.

 

The Company capitalizes curriculum development costs incurred during the development stage in accordance with ASC 350. The Company capitalizes curriculum development costs during the design and deployment phases of the project. Many of the Company’s new courses leverage off of proven delivery platforms and are primarily content, which has no technological hurdles. As a result, a significant portion of the Company’s courseware development costs qualify for capitalization due to the concentration of its development efforts on the content of the courseware. Capitalization ends when a course is available for general release to its customers, at which time amortization of the capitalized costs begins. The period of time over which these development costs will be amortized is generally five years.

 

Total capitalized curriculum development additions were $9.6 million and $6.5 million for the six months ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively. These amounts are recorded on the accompanying consolidated balance sheet net of amortization charges. Amortization is recorded in product development expenses on the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of operations.  Amortization expense for the three months ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 was $3.6 million and $3.1 million, respectively.  Amortization expense for the six months ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 was $7.1 million and $6.0 million, respectively.

 

Income Taxes

 

The Company accounts for income taxes in accordance with ASC 740, Income Taxes. Under ASC 740, deferred tax assets and liabilities are computed based on the difference between the financial reporting and income tax bases of assets and liabilities using the enacted marginal tax rate. ASC 740 requires that the net deferred tax asset be reduced by a valuation allowance if, based on the weight of available evidence, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the net deferred tax asset will not be realized.

 

Series A Special Stock

 

The Company issued 2,750,000 shares of Series A Special Stock in connection with an acquisition. The holders of the Series A Special Stock have the right to convert those shares into common stock on a one-for-one basis and the right to vote on all matters presented to K12 stockholders, other than for the election and removal of directors, for which holders of the Series A Special Stock have no voting rights.

 

Noncontrolling Interest

 

Earnings or losses attributable to other stockholders of a consolidated affiliated company are classified separately as “noncontrolling interest” in the Company’s condensed consolidated statements of operations. Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest reflects only the Company’s share of the after-tax earnings or losses of an affiliated company. Income taxes attributable to noncontrolling interest are determined using the applicable statutory tax rates in the jurisdictions where such operations are conducted. These rates vary from country to country. The Company’s condensed consolidated balance sheets reflect noncontrolling interest within the equity section of the condensed consolidated balance sheets rather than in the mezzanine section of the condensed consolidated balance sheets, except for redeemable noncontrolling interest. Noncontrolling interest is classified separately in the Company’s condensed consolidated statement of equity (deficit).

 

Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests

 

Noncontrolling interests in subsidiaries that are redeemable outside of the Company’s control for cash or other assets are classified outside of permanent equity at redeemable value which approximates fair value. The redeemable noncontrolling interests will be adjusted to their fair value at each balance sheet date. The resulting increases or decreases in the estimated redemption amount are affected by corresponding charges against retained earnings, or in the absence of retained earnings, additional paid-in-capital.

 

Goodwill and Intangible Assets

 

The Company records as goodwill the excess of purchase price over the fair value of the identifiable net assets acquired. Finite-lived intangible assets acquired in business combinations subject to amortization are recorded at their fair value. Finite-lived intangible assets include trade names, customer and distributor relationships and developed technology. Such intangible assets are amortized on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives. Amortization expense for the three months ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 was $1.1 million and $0.9 million, respectively.  Amortization expense for the six months ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 was $2.3 million and $1.8 million, respectively.  Future amortization of intangible assets is $2.3 million, $3.1 million, $3.1 million, $3.0 million and $2.4 million in the fiscal years ending June 30, 2013 through June 30, 2017, respectively, and $20.4 million thereafter. As of December 31, 2012 and June 30, 2012, goodwill balances were recorded at $61.5 million and $61.6 million, respectively.

 

The Company reviews its recorded finite-lived intangible assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be fully recoverable. If the total of the expected undiscounted future cash flows is less than the carrying amount of the asset, a loss is recognized for the difference between fair value and the carrying value of the asset.

 

ASC 350 prescribes a process for impairment testing of goodwill and intangibles with indefinite lives, which is performed annually, as well as when an event triggering impairment may have occurred. Goodwill and intangible assets deemed to have an indefinite life are tested for impairment on an annual basis, or earlier when events or changes in circumstances suggest the carrying amount may not be fully recoverable. The Company has elected to perform its annual assessment on May 31st of each year.

 

During the first six months of fiscal year 2013, the Company’s goodwill decreased by approximately $0.1 million due to adjustments made related to the acquisition of certain K-12 assets and Insight School management contracts of Kaplan Virtual Education (“KVE”), a subsidiary of Kaplan Inc. (the “Kaplan/Insight Assets”) (see Note 10) in connection with the finalization of the purchase price allocation.

 

The following table represents goodwill additions during the six months ended December 31, 2012:

 

Rollforward of Goodwill

 

Amount

 

 

 

($ in millions)

 

Balance as of June 30, 2012

 

$

61.6

 

Adjustments due to KVE and other foreign exchange translations

 

(0.1

)

Balance as of December 31, 2012

 

$

61.5

 

 

The following table represents the balance of intangible assets as of December 31 and June 30, 2012:

 

Intangible Assets

 

 

 

December 31, 2012

 

June 30, 2012

 

($ in millions)

 

Gross
Carrying
Amount

 

Accumulated
Amortization

 

Net
Carrying
Value

 

Gross
Carrying
Amount

 

Accumulated
Amortization

 

Net
Carrying
Value

 

Trade names

 

$

24.0

 

$

(3.8

)

$

20.2

 

$

24.0

 

$

(3.1

)

$

20.9

 

Customer and distributor relationships

 

18.9

 

(5.4

)

13.5

 

18.9

 

(4.0

)

14.9

 

Developed technology

 

1.5

 

(1.1

)

0.4

 

1.5

 

(0.9

)

0.6

 

Other

 

0.5

 

(0.2

)

0.3

 

0.5

 

(0.2

)

0.3

 

 

 

$

44.9

 

$

(10.5

)

$

34.4

 

$

44.9

 

$

(8.2

)

$

36.7

 

 

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

 

Long-lived assets include property, equipment, capitalized curriculum and software developed or obtained for internal use. In accordance with ASC 360, the Company reviews its recorded long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be fully recoverable. If the total of the expected undiscounted future cash flows is less than the carrying amount of the asset, a loss is recognized for the difference between fair value and the carrying value of the asset. There was no impairment charge for the period ended December 31, 2012.

 

Fair Value Measurements

 

ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements, defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability, in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability, in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. ASC 820 also establishes a fair value hierarchy which requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value.

 

ASC 820 describes three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value:

 

Level 1:  Inputs based on quoted market prices for identical assets or liabilities in active markets at the measurement date.

 

Level 2:  Observable inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1, such as quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar assets and liabilities in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data.

 

Level 3:  Inputs reflect management’s best estimate of what market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability at the measurement date. The inputs are unobservable in the market and significant to the instrument’s valuation.

 

The carrying values reflected in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets for cash and cash equivalents, receivables, inventory and debt approximate their fair values.

 

The redeemable noncontrolling interest is a result of the Company’s joint venture with Middlebury College to form Middlebury Interactive Languages. Under the agreement, Middlebury College has an irrevocable election to sell all (but not less than all) of its membership interest to the Company (put right). The fair value of the redeemable noncontrolling interest reflects management’s best estimate of the redemption of the put right.

 

The following table summarizes certain information at December 31, 2012 for assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis:

 

 

 

Fair Value Measurements Using:

 

 

 

 

 

Quoted Prices

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

in Active

 

Significant

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Markets for

 

Other

 

Significant

 

 

 

 

 

Identical

 

Observable

 

Unobservable

 

 

 

 

 

Assets

 

Input

 

Inputs

 

Description 

 

Fair Value

 

(Level 1)

 

(Level 2)

 

(Level 3)

 

 

 

(In thousands)

 

Redeemable Noncontrolling Interest in Middlebury Joint Venture

 

$

17,200

 

$

 

$

 

$

17,200

 

Investment in Web International Education Group, Ltd

 

10,000

 

 

 

10,000

 

Total

 

$

27,200

 

$

 

$

 

$

27,200

 

 

The following table summarizes certain information at June 30, 2012 for assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis:

 

 

 

Fair Value Measurements Using:

 

 

 

 

 

Quoted Prices

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

in Active

 

Significant

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Markets for

 

Other

 

Significant

 

 

 

 

 

Identical

 

Observable

 

Unobservable

 

 

 

 

 

Assets

 

Input

 

Inputs

 

Description 

 

Fair Value

 

(Level 1)

 

(Level 2)

 

(Level 3)

 

 

 

(In thousands)

 

Redeemable Noncontrolling Interest in Middlebury Joint Venture

 

$

17,200

 

$

 

$

 

$

17,200

 

Investment in Web International Education Group, Ltd

 

10,000

 

 

 

10,000

 

Total

 

$

27,200

 

$

 

$

 

$

27,200

 

 

The following table presents activity related to the Company’s fair value measurements categorized as Level 3 of the valuation hierarchy, valued on a recurring basis:

 

 

 

Six Months Ended December 31, 2012

 

 

 

 

 

Purchases,

 

 

 

Fair Value

 

 

 

Fair Value

 

Issuances,

 

Unrealized

 

December 31,

 

Description 

 

June 30, 2012

 

and Settlements

 

Gains/(Losses)

 

2012

 

 

 

(In thousands)

 

Redeemable Noncontrolling Interest in Middlebury Joint Venture

 

$

17,200

 

$

 

$

 

$

17,200

 

Investment in Web International Education Group, Ltd

 

10,000

 

 

 

10,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

 

$

27,200

 

$

 

$

 

$

27,200

 

 

The fair value of the investment in Web International Education Group, Ltd. (“Web”) as of December 31, 2012 was estimated to be $10.0 million. The fair value was measured based on the initial cost of the investment and Web’s operating performance since the initial investment as U.S. GAAP financial statements for Web are not available to more definitively determine fair value; there was no underlying change in its estimated market value. There have been no transfers in or out of Level 3 of the hierarchy for the period presented.

 

The fair value of the redeemable noncontrolling interest in the Middlebury Joint Venture was measured in accordance with ASC 480, Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity, and was based upon a valuation from a third-party valuation firm as of June 30, 2012. As of December 31, 2012, the Company performed an internal analysis and determined there was no underlying change in the estimated fair market value. This analysis incorporated a number of assumptions and estimates including the financial results of the joint venture to date.

 

Net Income Per Common Share

 

The Company calculates net income per share in accordance with ASC 260, Earnings Per Share. Under ASC 260, basic net income per common share is calculated by dividing net income by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the reporting period. The weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding includes vested restricted stock awards. Diluted earnings per share (“EPS”) reflects the potential dilution that could occur assuming conversion or exercise of all dilutive unexercised stock options. The dilutive effect of stock options and restricted stock awards was determined using the treasury stock method. Under the treasury stock method, the proceeds received from the exercise of stock options and restricted stock awards, the amount of compensation cost for future service not yet recognized by the Company and the amount of tax benefits that would be recorded in additional paid-in capital when the stock options become deductible for income tax purposes are all assumed to be used to repurchase shares of the Company’s common stock. Stock options and restricted awards are not included in the computation of diluted EPS when they are antidilutive. Common stock outstanding reflected in the Company’s consolidated balance sheet includes restricted awards outstanding. Securities that may participate in undistributed earnings with common stock are considered participating securities. Since the shares of Series A Special stock participate in all dividends and distributions declared or paid with respect to common stock of the Company (as if a holder of common stock), the shares of Series A Special stock meet the definition of a participating security under ASC 260. All securities that meet the definition of a participating security, regardless of whether the securities are convertible, non-convertible or potential common stock securities, are included in the computation of both basic and diluted EPS (as a reduction of the numerator) using the two-class method. Under the two-class method, all undistributed earnings in a period are to be allocated to common stock and participating securities to the extent that each security may share in earnings as if all of the earnings for the period had been distributed.

 

The following schedule presents the calculation of basic and diluted net income per share:

 

 

 

Three Months Ended
December 31,

 

Six Months Ended
December 31,

 

 

 

2012

 

2011

 

2012

 

2011

 

 

 

(In thousands except shares and per share data)

 

Basic earnings per share computation:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income — K12

 

$

9,511

 

$

4,165

 

$

13,868

 

$

8,766

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Amount allocated to participating Series A stockholders

 

$

(675

)

$

(297

)

$

(984

)

$

(627

)

Income available to common stockholders — basic

 

$

8,836

 

$

3,868

 

$

12,884

 

$

8,139

 

Weighted average common shares  — basic

 

36,118,519

 

35,755,685

 

36,073,885

 

35,692,761

 

Basic net income per share

 

$

0.24

 

$

0.11

 

$

0.36

 

$

0.23

 

Dilutive earnings per share computation:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income — K12

 

$

9,511

 

$

4,165

 

$

13,868

 

$

8,766

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Amount allocated to participating Series A stockholders

 

$

(675

)

$

(297

)

$

(984

)

$

(627

)

Income available to common stockholders — diluted

 

$

8,836

 

$

3,868

 

$

12,884

 

$

8,139

 

Share computation:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted average common shares  — basic

 

36,118,519

 

35,755,685

 

36,073,885

 

35,692,761

 

Effect of dilutive stock options and restricted stock awards

 

 

221,094

 

 

317,117

 

Weighted average common shares outstanding — diluted

 

36,118,519

 

35,976,779

 

36,073,885

 

36,009,878

 

Diluted net income per share

 

$

0.24

 

$

0.11

 

$

0.36

 

$

0.23

 

 

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

 

In June 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the “FASB”) issued ASU 2011-05, Presentation of Comprehensive Income, which provides authoritative guidance on disclosure requirements for comprehensive income. This accounting update eliminated the option to present the components of other comprehensive income as part of the statement of stockholders’ equity. Instead, the Company must report comprehensive income in either a single continuous statement of comprehensive income which contains two sections, net income and other comprehensive income, or in two separate but consecutive statements. This guidance became effective for the Company beginning on July 1, 2012. The standard has been adopted and the presentation of comprehensive income (loss) has changed.

 

In July 2012, the FASB issued ASU 2012-02, Intangibles - Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Testing Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets for Impairment, which provides authoritative guidance on application of the impairment model for indefinite-lived intangible assets. This accounting update permits an entity to assess qualitative factors to determine whether the existence of events and circumstances indicates that it is more likely than not that indefinite-lived intangible assets are impaired as part of its annual assessment. This guidance became effective for the Company beginning on July 1, 2012. The adoption of this standard did not have a material impact on its financial condition, results of operations or disclosures.