Regulatory	3 Months Ended
Mar. 31, 2014
Text Block [Abstract]
Regulatory	9. Regulatory The University is subject to extensive regulation by federal and state governmental agencies and accrediting bodies. In particular, the Higher Education Act of 1965, as amended (the “Higher Education Act”), and the regulations promulgated thereunder by the Department of Education, subject the University to significant regulatory scrutiny on the basis of numerous standards that schools must satisfy in order to participate in the various federal student financial assistance programs under Title IV of the Higher Education Act. To participate in the Title IV programs, an institution must be authorized to offer its programs of instruction by the relevant agency of the state in which it is located, accredited by an accrediting agency recognized by the Department of Education and certified as eligible by the Department of Education. The Department of Education will certify an institution to participate in the Title IV programs only after the institution has demonstrated compliance with the Higher Education Act and the Department of Education’s extensive regulations regarding institutional eligibility. An institution must also demonstrate its compliance to the Department of Education on an ongoing basis. As of March 31, 2014, management believes the University is in compliance with the applicable regulations in all material respects. Because the University operates in a highly regulated industry, it, like other industry participants, may be subject from time to time to investigations, claims of non-compliance, or lawsuits by governmental agencies or third parties, which allege statutory violations, regulatory infractions, or common law causes of action. While there can be no assurance that regulatory agencies or third parties will not undertake investigations or make claims against the University, or that such claims, if made, will not have a material adverse effect on the University’s business, results of operations or financial condition, management believes the University is in compliance with applicable regulations in all material respects. As part of its oversight of the educational institutions participating in the Title IV programs under the Higher Education Act of 1965, as amended, the Department of Education periodically conducts program reviews at selected schools that receive Title IV funds for the purpose of evaluating the school’s compliance with the Title IV requirements, identifying any liabilities to the Department of Education for errors in compliance, and improving future institutional capabilities. On April 13, 2014, the University received official notification from the Department of Education of the Department of Education’s intent to conduct a program review at Grand Canyon University. The program review will include the University’s administration of the Title IV programs in which it participates, its administration of the Clery Act and related regulations, and its compliance with the requirements of the Drug-Free Schools and Communities Act for the 2012-2013 and 2013-2014 award years. The University believes that it has effective policies and procedures in place that are planned and implemented to comply with the applicable standards and regulations under Title IV and the other matters being reviewed. If and to the extent the Department of Education’s program review identifies any compliance issues, the University is committed to resolving such issues and ensuring that Grand Canyon University operates in compliance with all legal requirements. Program reviews may be unresolved for several months or years with little or no communication from the Department of Education, and may involve additional exchanges of information following the site visit. The University cannot presently predict the outcome of this program review or when the final program review determination will be issued. If the Department of Education were to make significant findings of non-compliance in the final program review determination, it could have a material adverse effect on the University’s business, results of operations, cash flows, and financial position.

9. Regulatory

The University is subject to extensive regulation by federal and state governmental agencies and accrediting bodies. In particular, the Higher Education Act of 1965, as amended (the “Higher Education Act”), and the regulations promulgated thereunder by the Department of Education, subject the University to significant regulatory scrutiny on the basis of numerous standards that schools must satisfy in order to participate in the various federal student financial assistance programs under Title IV of the Higher Education Act.

To participate in the Title IV programs, an institution must be authorized to offer its programs of instruction by the relevant agency of the state in which it is located, accredited by an accrediting agency recognized by the Department of Education and certified as eligible by the Department of Education. The Department of Education will certify an institution to participate in the Title IV programs only after the institution has demonstrated compliance with the Higher Education Act and the Department of Education’s extensive regulations regarding institutional eligibility. An institution must also demonstrate its compliance to the Department of Education on an ongoing basis. As of March 31, 2014, management believes the University is in compliance with the applicable regulations in all material respects.

Because the University operates in a highly regulated industry, it, like other industry participants, may be subject from time to time to investigations, claims of non-compliance, or lawsuits by governmental agencies or third parties, which allege statutory violations, regulatory infractions, or common law causes of action. While there can be no assurance that regulatory agencies or third parties will not undertake investigations or make claims against the University, or that such claims, if made, will not have a material adverse effect on the University’s business, results of operations or financial condition, management believes the University is in compliance with applicable regulations in all material respects.

As part of its oversight of the educational institutions participating in the Title IV programs under the Higher Education Act of 1965, as amended, the Department of Education periodically conducts program reviews at selected schools that receive Title IV funds for the purpose of evaluating the school’s compliance with the Title IV requirements, identifying any liabilities to the Department of Education for errors in compliance, and improving future institutional capabilities. On April 13, 2014, the University received official notification from the Department of Education of the Department of Education’s intent to conduct a program review at Grand Canyon University. The program review will include the University’s administration of the Title IV programs in which it participates, its administration of the Clery Act and related regulations, and its compliance with the requirements of the Drug-Free Schools and Communities Act for the 2012-2013 and 2013-2014 award years.

The University believes that it has effective policies and procedures in place that are planned and implemented to comply with the applicable standards and regulations under Title IV and the other matters being reviewed. If and to the extent the Department of Education’s program review identifies any compliance issues, the University is committed to resolving such issues and ensuring that Grand Canyon University operates in compliance with all legal requirements. Program reviews may be unresolved for several months or years with little or no communication from the Department of Education, and may involve additional exchanges of information following the site visit. The University cannot presently predict the outcome of this program review or when the final program review determination will be issued. If the Department of Education were to make significant findings of non-compliance in the final program review determination, it could have a material adverse effect on the University’s business, results of operations, cash flows, and financial position.