Fair Value of Derivative and Other Financial Instruments

Additional information concerning energy related derivative contracts and other financial instruments is contained in Note 8 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in the 2016 Annual Reports on Form 10-K.

Fair value is defined under GAAP as the price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. Fair value is based on current market quotes as available and is supplemented by modeling techniques and assumptions made by the Company to the extent quoted market prices or volatilities are not available. External pricing input availability varies based on commodity location, market liquidity, and term of the agreement. Valuations of derivative assets and liabilities take into account nonperformance risk including the effect of counterparties’ and the Company’s credit risk. The Company regularly assesses the validity and availability of pricing data for its derivative transactions. Although the Company uses its best judgment in estimating the fair value of these instruments, there are inherent limitations in any estimation technique.

Energy Related Derivative Contracts

Overview

The primary objective for the use of commodity derivative instruments, including energy contracts, options, swaps, and futures, is to manage price risk associated with forecasted purchases of energy and fuel used to generate electricity, as well as managing anticipated generation capacity in excess of forecasted demand from existing customers. PNM’s energy related derivative contracts manage commodity risk. PNM is required to meet the demand and energy needs of its retail and wholesale customers. PNM is exposed to market risk for its share of PVNGS Unit 3 and the needs of its wholesale customers not covered under a FPPAC. However, as discussed below, PNM has hedging arrangements for the output of PVNGS Unit 3 through December 31, 2017, at which time PVNGS Unit 3 will be included as a jurisdictional resource to serve New Mexico retail customers. Beginning January 1, 2018, PNM expects to be exposed to market risk for the 65 MW of SJGS Unit 4 that is anticipated to be transferred to PNM from PNMR Development (Note 11). PNM’s operations are managed primarily through a net asset-backed strategy, whereby PNM’s aggregate net open forward contract position is covered by its forecasted excess generation capabilities or market purchases. PNM could be exposed to market risk if its generation capabilities were to be disrupted or if its load requirements were to be greater than anticipated. If all or a portion of load requirements were required to be covered as a result of such unexpected situations, commitments would have to be met through market purchases. TNMP does not enter into energy related derivative contracts.

Commodity Risk

Marketing and procurement of energy often involve market risks associated with managing energy commodities and establishing open positions in the energy markets, primarily on a short-term basis. PNM routinely enters into various derivative instruments such as forward contracts, option agreements, and price basis swap agreements to economically hedge price and volume risk on power commitments and fuel requirements and to minimize the effect of market fluctuations in wholesale portfolios. PNM monitors the market risk of its commodity contracts using VaR calculations to maintain total exposure within management-prescribed limits in accordance with approved risk and credit policies.

Accounting for Derivatives

Under derivative accounting and related rules for energy contracts, PNM accounts for its various derivative instruments for the purchase and sale of energy based on PNM’s intent. During the six months ended June 30, 2017 and the year ended December 31, 2016, PNM was not hedging its exposure to the variability in future cash flows from commodity derivatives through designated cash flows hedges. The contracts recorded at fair value that do not qualify or are not designated for cash flow hedge accounting are classified as economic hedges. Economic hedges are defined as derivative instruments, including long-term power agreements, used to economically hedge generation assets, purchased power and fuel costs, and customer load requirements. Changes in the fair value of economic hedges are reflected in results of operations and are classified between operating revenues and cost of energy according to the intent of the hedge. PNM has no trading transactions.

Commodity Derivatives

PNM’s commodity derivative instruments that are recorded at fair value, all of which are accounted for as economic hedges, are summarized as follows:



	Economic Hedges
	June 30, 2017			December 31, 2016
	(In thousands)
Current assets	$	3,847		$	5,224
Deferred charges	4,106			—
	7,953			5,224
Current liabilities	(1,990		)	(2,339		)
Long-term liabilities	(4,106		)	—
	(6,096		)	(2,339		)
Net	$	1,857		$	2,885

Included in the above table are $1.3 million and $2.7 million of current assets at June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 related to contracts for the sale of energy from PVNGS Unit 3 through 2017 at market price plus a premium. Certain of PNM’s commodity derivative instruments in the above table are subject to master netting agreements whereby assets and liabilities could be offset in the settlement process. PNM does not offset fair value and cash collateral for derivative instruments under master netting arrangements and the above table reflects the gross amounts of fair value assets and liabilities for commodity derivatives. Included in the above table are equal amounts of assets and liabilities aggregating $5.2 million at June 30, 2017 and $0.5 million at December 31, 2016, which result from PNM’s hazard sharing arrangements with Tri-State (Note 12). The hazard sharing arrangements are net-settled upon delivery. Other amounts that could be offset under master netting agreements were immaterial.

At June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, PNM had no amounts recognized for the legal right to reclaim cash collateral. However, at June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, amounts posted as cash collateral under margin arrangements were $1.3 million and $2.6 million. At June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, obligations to return cash collateral were $0.1 million and $0.1 million. Cash collateral amounts are included in other current assets and other current liabilities on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.

PNM has a NMPRC approved hedging plan to manage fuel and purchased power costs related to customers covered by its FPPAC. The table above includes $0.1 million of current assets and less than $0.1 million of current liabilities at June 30, 2017 and $0.2 million of current assets and $0.1 million of current liabilities at December 31, 2016 related to this plan. The offsets to these amounts are recorded as regulatory assets and liabilities on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.

The following table presents the effect of mark-to-market commodity derivative instruments on PNM’s earnings, excluding income tax effects. Commodity derivatives had no impact on OCI for the periods presented.



	Economic Hedges
	Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
	June 30,						June 30,
	2017			2016			2017			2016
	(In thousands)
Electric operating revenues	$	4,592		$	(4,123	)	$	7,933		$	(1,439	)
Cost of energy	(5,286		)	(967		)	(5,276		)	(1,112		)
Total gain (loss)	$	(694	)	$	(5,090	)	$	2,657		$	(2,551	)

Commodity contract volume positions are presented in MMBTU for gas related contracts and in MWh for power related contracts. The table below presents PNM’s net buy (sell) volume positions:



	Economic Hedges
	MMBTU	MWh

June 30, 2017	177,500	(1,383,295	)
December 31, 2016	254,100	(2,471,600	)

In connection with managing its commodity risks, PNM enters into master agreements with certain counterparties. If PNM is in a net liability position under an agreement, some agreements provide that the counterparties can request collateral if PNM’s credit rating is downgraded; other agreements provide that the counterparty may request collateral to provide it with “adequate assurance” that PNM will perform; and others have no provision for collateral.

PNM has contingent requirements to provide collateral under commodity contracts having an objectively determinable collateral provision that are in net liability positions and are not fully collateralized with cash. At June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, PNM had no such contracts in a net liability position.

Sale of Power from PVNGS Unit 3

Because PNM’s 134 MW share of Unit 3 at PVNGS is not currently included in retail rates, that unit’s power is being sold in the wholesale market. PVNGS Unit 3 will be included as a jurisdictional resource to serve New Mexico retail customers beginning on January 1, 2018. As of June 30, 2017, PNM had contracted to sell substantially all of PVNGS Unit 3 output through 2017 at market price plus a premium. Through hedging arrangements that are accounted for as economic hedges, PNM has established fixed rates for substantially all of the sales through 2017, which average approximately $29 per MWh.

Non-Derivative Financial Instruments

The carrying amounts reflected on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets approximate fair value for cash, receivables, and payables due to the short period of maturity. Available-for-sale securities are carried at fair value. Available-for-sale securities consist of PNM assets held in the NDT for its share of decommissioning costs of PVNGS and trusts for PNM’s share of final reclamation costs related to the coal mines serving SJGS and Four Corners (Note 11). At June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the fair value of available-for-sale securities included $274.4 million and $253.9 million for the NDT and $20.6 million and $19.1 million for the mine reclamation trusts. The fair value and gross unrealized gains of investments in available-for-sale securities are presented in the following table.



	June 30, 2017				December 31, 2016
	Unrealized Gains		Fair Value		Unrealized Gains		Fair Value
			(In thousands)
Cash and cash equivalents	$	—	$	10,318	$	—	$	23,683
Equity securities:
Domestic value	4,640		69,106		1,135		34,796
Domestic growth	4,542		68,147		3,032		47,595
International and other	3,396		38,620		2,029		27,481
Fixed income securities:
U.S. Government	371		29,411		115		40,962
Municipals	949		37,137		585		43,789
Corporate and other	1,423		42,287		553		54,671
	$	15,321	$	295,026	$	7,449	$	272,977

The proceeds and gross realized gains and losses on the disposition of available-for-sale securities are shown in the following table. Realized gains and losses are determined by specific identification of costs of securities sold. Gross realized losses shown below exclude the (increase)/decrease in realized impairment losses of $(0.1) million and $1.0 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 and $(0.7) million and $0.9 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016.



	Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
	June 30,						June 30,
	2017			2016			2017			2016
	(In thousands)
Proceeds from sales	$	91,657		$	69,115		$	358,045		$	194,014
Gross realized gains	$	7,971		$	9,531		$	16,617		$	20,247
Gross realized (losses)	$	(2,236	)	$	(4,233	)	$	(5,321	)	$	(10,349	)

Held-to-maturity securities are those investments in debt securities that the Company has the ability and intent to hold until maturity. At June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, PNMR’s held-to-maturity securities consist of the Westmoreland Loan.

The Company has no available-for-sale or held-to-maturity securities for which carrying value exceeds fair value. There are no impairments considered to be “other than temporary” that are included in AOCI and not recognized in earnings.

At June 30, 2017, the available-for-sale and held-to-maturity debt securities had the following final maturities:



	Fair Value
	Available-for-Sale		Held-to-Maturity
	PNMR and PNM		PNMR
	(In thousands)
Within 1 year	$	4,426	$	—
After 1 year through 5 years	22,201		86,070
After 5 years through 10 years	27,997		—
After 10 years through 15 years	4,324		—
After 15 years through 20 years	10,623		—
After 20 years	39,264		—
	$	108,835	$	86,070

Fair Value Disclosures

The Company determines the fair values of its derivative and other financial instruments based on the hierarchy established in GAAP, which requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. GAAP describes three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value. Level 1 inputs are quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the reporting entity has the ability to access at the measurement date. Level 2 inputs are inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs for the asset or liability. Level 3 inputs used in determining fair values for the Company consist of internal valuation models. The Company records any transfers between fair value hierarchy levels as of the end of each calendar quarter. There were no transfers between levels during the six months ended June 30, 2017 or the year ended December 31, 2016.

For available-for-sale securities, Level 2 fair values are provided by the trustee utilizing a pricing service. The pricing provider predominantly uses the market approach using bid side market value based upon a hierarchy of information for specific securities or securities with similar characteristics. For commodity derivatives, Level 2 fair values are determined based on market observable inputs, which are validated using multiple broker quotes, including forward price, volatility, and interest rate curves to establish expectations of future prices. Credit valuation adjustments are made for estimated credit losses based on the overall exposure to each counterparty. For the Company’s long-term debt, Level 2 fair values are provided by an external pricing service. The pricing service primarily utilizes quoted prices for similar debt in active markets when determining fair value. For investments categorized as Level 3, including the Westmoreland Loan and certain items in other investments, fair values were determined by discounted cash flow models that take into consideration discount rates that are observable for similar types of assets and liabilities. Management of the Company independently verifies the information provided by pricing services.

Items recorded at fair value by PNM on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets are presented below by level of the fair value hierarchy. There were no Level 3 fair value measurements at June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 for items recorded at fair value.



				GAAP Fair Value Hierarchy
	Total			Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)
	(In thousands)
June 30, 2017
Available-for-sale securities
Cash and cash equivalents	$	10,318		$	10,318	$	—
Equity securities:
Domestic value	69,106			69,106		—
Domestic growth	68,147			68,147		—
International and other	38,620			35,366		3,254
Fixed income securities:
U.S. Government	29,411			28,187		1,224
Municipals	37,137			—		37,137
Corporate and other	42,287			—		42,287
	$	295,026		$	211,124	$	83,902

Commodity derivative assets	$	7,953		$	—	$	7,953
Commodity derivative liabilities	(6,096		)	—		(6,096		)
Net	$	1,857		$	—	$	1,857

December 31, 2016
Available-for-sale securities
Cash and cash equivalents	$	23,683		$	23,683	$	—
Equity securities:
Domestic value	34,796			34,796		—
Domestic growth	47,595			47,595		—
International and other	27,481			27,481		—
Fixed income securities:
U.S. Government	40,962			39,723		1,239
Municipals	43,789			—		43,789
Corporate and other	54,671			23,158		31,513
	$	272,977		$	196,436	$	76,541

Commodity derivative assets	$	5,224		$	—	$	5,224
Commodity derivative liabilities	(2,339		)	—		(2,339		)
Net	$	2,885		$	—	$	2,885

The carrying amounts and fair values of investments in the Westmoreland Loan, other investments, and long-term debt, which are not recorded at fair value on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets are presented below:



					GAAP Fair Value Hierarchy
	Carrying Amount		Fair Value		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
June 30, 2017	(In thousands)
PNMR
Long-term debt	$	2,373,362	$	2,502,268	$	—	$	2,502,268	$	—
Westmoreland Loan	$	75,820	$	86,070	$	—	$	—	$	86,070
Other investments	$	404	$	1,051	$	404	$	—	$	647
PNM
Long-term debt	$	1,631,912	$	1,718,492	$	—	$	1,718,492	$	—
Other investments	$	173	$	173	$	173	$	—	$	—
TNMP
Long-term debt	$	421,024	$	462,016	$	—	$	462,016	$	—
Other investments	$	231	$	231	$	231	$	—	$	—

December 31, 2016
PNMR
Long-term debt	$	2,392,712	$	2,540,693	$	—	$	2,540,693	$	—
Westmoreland Loan	$	95,000	$	100,893	$	—	$	—	$	100,893
Other investments	$	547	$	1,164	$	547	$	—	$	617
PNM
Long-term debt	$	1,631,369	$	1,730,157	$	—	$	1,730,157	$	—
Other investments	$	316	$	316	$	316	$	—	$	—
TNMP
Long-term debt	$	420,875	$	468,329	$	—	$	468,329	$	—
Other investments	$	231	$	231	$	231	$	—	$	—