XML 62 R15.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.8
Income Taxes
6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2014
Income Tax Disclosure [Abstract]  
Income Taxes
INCOME TAXES
Accounting standards state that companies account for income taxes using the asset and liability approach, which requires the recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of temporary differences between the carrying amounts and the tax basis of assets and liabilities. This method also requires the recognition of future tax benefits, such as net operating loss carryforwards and other tax credits. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to reverse. Valuation allowances are recorded as necessary to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount thereof that is more likely than not to be realized. The likelihood of realizing deferred tax assets is evaluated by, among other things, estimating future taxable income, considering the future reversal of existing deferred tax liabilities to which the deferred tax assets may be applied and assessing the impact of tax planning strategies.
For interim periods, accounting standards require that income tax expense be determined by applying the estimated annual effective income tax rate to year-to-date results unless this method does not result in a reliable estimate of year-to-date income tax expense.  Each quarter the income tax accrual is adjusted to the latest estimate and the difference from the previously accrued year-to-date balance is adjusted to the current quarter.
The income tax components and associated effective income tax rates for the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 are as follows:
 
Six Months Ended June 30,
 
2014
 
2013
 
Tax Benefit
 
Tax Rate
 
Tax Provision
 
Tax Rate
Continuing operations
$
(12.3
)
 
(50
)%
 
$
47.2

 
23
%
Discontinued operations

 
35
 %
 
0.2

 
35
%
 
$
(12.3
)
 
(50
)%
 
$
47.4

 
23
%

For the first six months of 2014, the primary differences between the U.S. statutory rate of 35% and the effective rate applicable to LP’s continuing operations relate to state income taxes, the effect of foreign tax rates and the effects of foreign exchange on functional currencies.  For the first six months of 2013, the primary differences between the U.S. statutory rate of 35% and the effective rate applicable to LP’s continuing operations relate to the effect of foreign tax rates and decreases in valuation allowances attributed to net operating loss carryforwards in various jurisdictions.
LP periodically reviews the need for valuation allowances against deferred tax assets and recognizes these deferred tax assets to the extent that the realization is more likely than not. Based upon its review of available positive and negative evidence, LP believes that the valuation allowances provided are appropriate. If LP were to determine that it would not be able to realize a portion of an existing net deferred tax asset in excess of an existing valuation allowance, an adjustment to the net deferred tax asset would be charged to earnings in the period in which such determination was made. Conversely, if it were to make a determination that it is more likely than not that an existing deferred tax asset for which there is currently a valuation allowance would be realized, the related valuation allowance would be reduced and a benefit to earnings would be recorded in the period in which such determination was made.
As a result of certain recognition requirements of ASC 718 Compensation -- Stock Compensation, certain deferred tax assets as of June 30, 2014 are not recognized in relation to amounts of tax deductions for equity compensation that are greater than the compensation recognized for financial reporting. Equity will be increased by $13.2 million if and when such deferred tax assets are ultimately realized. LP uses the "with and without" method for determining when excess tax benefits have been realized.
LP and its domestic subsidiaries are subject to U.S. federal income tax as well as income taxes of multiple state jurisdictions. Its foreign subsidiaries are subject to income tax in Canada, Chile, Peru and Brazil. The U.S. Internal Revenue Service (IRS) has proposed certain adjustments to the federal returns for tax years 2007 - 2009, and LP is currently engaged in settlement discussions with the IRS Appeals Office. During the third quarter of 2013, LP deposited $17.1 million with the IRS to suspend the accrual of interest pending the resolution of these matters. The deposit is included within other assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. LP remains subject to U.S. federal examinations of tax years 2010 through 2012, as well as state and local tax examinations for the tax years 2007 through 2012. Canadian federal income tax returns for years 2010 through 2013 are subject to examination and no examinations are currently in progress. Quebec provincial returns have been audited and effectively settled through 2012. As of June 30, 2014, Chilean returns for years 2010 - 2012 are under review by the Chilean Tax Office. Brazilian returns for years 2009 - 2013 are subject to audit, but no examinations are currently in progress.