XML 36 R8.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT ﻿
v2.3.0.11

Summary Of Significant Accounting Policies | 12 Months Ended
--- | ---
Jul. 31, 2011
Summary Of Significant Accounting Policies |
Summary Of Significant Accounting Policies | A. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES Nature of Operations — Thor Industries, Inc. was founded in 1980 and, together with its subsidiaries (the "Company"), manufactures a wide range of recreation vehicles and small and mid-size buses at various manufacturing facilities across the United States. These products are sold to independent dealers and municipalities primarily throughout the United States and Canada. Unless the context otherwise requires or indicates, all references to "Thor", the "Company", "we", "our" and "us" refer to Thor Industries, Inc. and its subsidiaries. The Company's core business activities are comprised of three distinct operations, which include the design, manufacture and sale of motorized recreation vehicles, towable recreation vehicles and buses. Accordingly, the Company has presented segmented financial information for these three segments at Note L of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements. Certain amounts for 2010 have been reclassified to conform to current period presentation. Specifically, current and long-term deferred income taxes, which were previously included with prepaid expenses and other long-term assets, respectively, are presented separately in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Principles of Consolidation — The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Thor Industries, Inc. and its wholly-owned domestic and foreign subsidiaries. All intercompany balances and transactions are eliminated upon consolidation. Cash and Cash Equivalents — Interest-bearing deposits and other investments with maturities of three months or less when purchased are considered cash equivalents. At July 31, 2011 and 2010, cash and cash equivalents of $181,012 and $162,888, respectively, were held by one financial institution. The remaining $34,423 and $84,863 at July 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively, were held at various other financial institutions. Investments — The Company classifies investments as available-for-sale or trading. Fair Value of Financial Investments — The carrying amount of cash equivalents, investments, accounts receivable and accounts payable approximate fair value because of the relatively short maturity of these financial instruments. Inventories — Substantially all inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market, determined on the last-in, first-out ("LIFO") basis. Manufacturing costs include materials, labor, freight-out and manufacturing overhead. Unallocated overhead and abnormal costs are expensed as incurred. Depreciation — Property, plant and equipment are recorded at cost and depreciated using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets as follows: Buildings and improvements — 10 to 39 years Machinery and equipment — 3 to 10 years Depreciation expense is recorded in cost of products sold except for $3,022, $2,545 and $1,728 in fiscal 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively, which is recorded in selling, general and administrative expenses. Other Assets — Other assets consist of goodwill, trademarks, dealer networks, technology assets, non-compete agreements, long-term investments and notes receivables. Trademarks are being amortized on a straight-line basis over 20 to 25 years. Dealer networks are primarily amortized on an accelerated cash flow basis, and technology assets and non-compete agreements are amortized using the straight-line method over 5 to 15 years. Goodwill is not amortized but is tested at least annually for impairment. Long-lived Assets — Long-lived assets and identifiable intangibles that are amortized are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable from future cash flows. If the carrying value of a long-lived asset is impaired, an impairment charge is recorded for the amount by which the carrying value of the long-lived asset exceeds its fair value. Product Warranties — Estimated warranty costs are provided at the time of sale of the warranted products. Warranty reserves are reviewed and adjusted as necessary on a quarterly basis. Allowance for Doubtful Accounts — A summary of allowance for doubtful accounts activity is as follows:
|  | Year Ended July 31, 2011 |  | Year Ended July 31, 2010 |  |  | Year Ended July 31, 2009 |
Beginning Balance |  | $ 422 |  |  | $ 302 |  |  |  | $ 295 |
Net charged to expense |  | 3 |  |  | 195 |  |  |  | 326 |
Write-offs net of recoveries/payments |  | (116) |  |  | (75) |  |  |  | (319) |
Heartland acquisition |  | 240 |  |  | – |  |  |  | – |
Ending Balance |  | $ 549 |  |  | $ 422 |  |  |  | $ 302 |
Insurance Reserves — Generally, we are self-insured for workers' compensation, products liability and group medical insurance. Under these plans, liabilities are recognized for claims incurred, including those incurred but not reported. The liability for workers' compensation claims is determined by the Company with the assistance of a third party administrator and actuary using various state statutes and historical claims experience. Group medical reserves are estimated using historical claims experience. We have a self-insured retention for products liability and personal injury matters of $5,000 per occurrence. We have established a liability on our balance sheet for such occurrences based on historical data, known cases and actuarial information. Currently, we maintain excess liability insurance aggregating $50,000 with outside insurance carriers to minimize our risks related to catastrophic claims in excess of all our self-insured positions for products liability and personal injury matters Revenue Recognition – Revenues from the sale of recreation vehicles and buses are recognized when title passes, which is when shipped to dealers, distributors or contract buyers in accordance with shipping terms, which are primarily FOB shipping point. Revenues from the sale of recreation vehicles and buses are recorded when all of the following conditions have been met: 1) An order for a product has been received from a dealer; 2) Written or oral approval for payment has been received from the dealer's flooring institution; 3) A common carrier signs the delivery ticket accepting responsibility for the product as agent for the dealer; and 4) The product is removed from the Company's property for delivery to the dealer who placed the order. Certain shipments are sold to customers on credit or cash on delivery ("COD") terms. The Company recognizes revenue on credit sales upon shipment and COD sales upon payment and delivery. Most sales are made by dealers financing their purchases under flooring arrangements with banks or finance companies. Products are not sold on consignment, dealers do not have the right to return products and dealers are typically responsible for interest costs to floor plan lenders. On average, the Company receives payments from floor plan lenders on products sold to dealers within 15 days of the invoice date. Amounts billed to dealers for delivery of product are recognized as revenue with the corresponding delivery expense charged to costs of products sold. . Dealer Volume Rebates, Sales Incentives and Advertising Costs – Estimated costs related to dealer volume rebates and sales incentives are accrued as a reduction of revenue at the later of the time products are sold or the date the rebate or incentive is offered. Advertising costs, which consist primarily of tradeshows, were $7,149, $5,377 and $5,770 in fiscal 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Repurchase Agreements - The Company is contingently liable under terms of repurchase agreements with financial institutions providing inventory financing for certain dealers of certain of its products. These arrangements, which are customary in the industry, provide for the repurchase of products sold to dealers in the event of default by the dealer. The risk of loss from these agreements is spread over numerous dealers. The repurchase price is generally determined by the original sales price of the product and pre-defined curtailment arrangements and the Company typically resells the repurchased product at a discount from its repurchase price. The Company accounts for the guarantee under its repurchase agreements of its dealers' financing by estimating and deferring a portion of the related product sale that represents the estimated fair value of the repurchase obligation. This deferred amount is included in the Company's repurchase and guarantee reserve. Additionally, the repurchase and guarantee reserve includes the Company's estimated loss upon resale of expected repurchases. This estimate is based on recent historical experience supplemented by management's assessment of current economic and other conditions affecting its dealers. Estimates – The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amount of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Key estimates include reserves for inventory, incurred but not reported medical claims, warranty claims, recalls, workers' compensation claims, vehicle repurchases, uncertain tax positions, product and non-product litigation, fair value of auction rate securities and assumptions made in the impairment assessments. The Company bases its estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. The Company believes that such estimates are made using consistent and appropriate methods. Actual results could differ from these estimates. Income Taxes – The Company accounts for income taxes under the provisions of ASC 740, "Income Taxes". The objectives of accounting for income taxes are to recognize the amount of taxes payable or refundable for the current year and deferred tax liabilities and assets for the future tax consequences of events that have been recognized in the Company's financial statements or tax returns. Judgment is required in assessing the future tax consequences of events that have been recognized in the Company's financial statements or tax returns. Foreign Currency – Assets and liabilities of the Company's Canadian operations (which ceased operations in fiscal 2010) reported in the consolidated balance sheets have been translated at current exchange rates. Revenues and expenses reported in the consolidated statements of income for fiscal 2010 and prior have been translated at the average exchange rate for the year. Translation adjustments have been included in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss). Transaction gains and losses are not significant. Stock Options – The Company uses the Black-Scholes option pricing model to estimate the grant date fair value of its option grants. The fair value and related compensation costs are recognized over the option vesting period which is 3 to 5 years. Earnings Per Share – Basic earnings per common share ("EPS") is computed by dividing net income by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. Diluted EPS is computed by dividing net income by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding assuming dilution. The difference between basic EPS and diluted EPS is the result of outstanding stock options and restricted stock.
|  | 2011 |  |  | 2010 |  |  | 2009 |
Weighted average shares outstanding for basic earnings per share |  |  | 55,271,340 |  |  |  | 53,019,008 |  |  |  | 55,429,373 |
Stock options and restricted stock |  |  | 102,301 |  |  |  | 100,356 |  |  |  | 47,097 |
Weighted average shares outstanding assuming dilution |  |  | 55,373,641 |  |  |  | 53,119,364 |  |  |  | 55,476,470 |
The Company excludes stock options that have an antidilutive effect from its calculation of weighted average shares outstanding assuming dilution. At July 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009 the Company had stock options outstanding of 729,826, 784,000 and 404,061 respectively, that were excluded from this calculation. Accounting Pronouncements In June 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued SFAS No. 167, "Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46(R)" ("SFAS 167"). SFAS 167 amends ASC 810 (formerly FASB Interpretation No. 46(R)) by adding previously considered qualifying special purpose entities (the concept of these entities was eliminated by SFAS No. 166). In addition, companies must perform an analysis to determine whether the company's variable interest or interests give it a controlling financial interest in a variable interest entity. Companies must also reassess on an ongoing basis whether the company is the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity. The amendments to ASC 810 are effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2009. The Company adopted the amendments effective August 1, 2010. The adoption of the amendments did not have any impact on its financial statements. In July 2010, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update, or "ASU", No. 2010-20 "Disclosures about the Credit Quality of Financing Receivables and Allowance for Credit Losses". The new disclosure guidance expands the existing requirements. The enhanced disclosures provide information on the nature of credit risk in a company's financing of receivables, how that risk is analyzed in determining the related allowance for credit losses and changes to the allowance during the reporting period. The new disclosures became effective for the Company's interim and annual reporting periods ending after December 15, 2010. The Company has included applicable disclosures within Note Q to the Consolidated Financial Statements. In December 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-28, "Intangibles – Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): When to Perform Step 2 of the Goodwill Impairment Test for Reporting Units with Zero or Negative Carrying Amounts", which modifies Step 1 of the goodwill impairment test for reporting units with zero or negative carrying amounts. For those reporting units, an entity is required to perform step 2 of the goodwill impairment test if it is more likely than not that a goodwill impairment exists. In determining whether it is more likely than not that a goodwill impairment exists, an entity should consider whether there are any adverse qualitative factors indicating that an impairment might exist. The qualitative factors are consistent with the existing guidance which requires that goodwill of a reporting unit be tested for impairment between annual tests if an event occurs or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying amount. This new guidance was effective for the Company's interim and annual reporting periods ending after December 15, 2010. The adoption of this standard had no affect on the Company's impairment testing of goodwill. In December 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-29, "Business Combinations (Topic 805): Disclosure of Supplementary Pro Forma Information for Business Combinations", which specifies that when a public company completes a business combination, the company should disclose revenue and earnings of the combined entity as though the business combination occurred as of the beginning of the comparable prior annual reporting period. This standard also expands the supplemental pro forma disclosures under Topic 805 to include a description of the nature and amount of material, nonrecurring pro forma adjustments directly attributable to the business combination included in the pro forma revenue and earnings. The requirements in this standard are effective for business combinations that occur on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2010. The Company will apply the provisions of ASU 2010-29 on a prospective basis. The impact of adoption of this guidance will depend on future acquisitions. In May 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-04, "Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRS", which is intended to improve comparability of fair value measurements presented and disclosed in financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles and International Financial Reporting Standards. This standard clarifies the application of existing fair value measurement requirements, including (1) the application of the highest and best use valuation premise, (2) the methodology to measure the fair value of an instrument classified in a reporting entity's shareholders' equity, (3) disclosure requirements for quantitative information on Level 3 fair value measurements and (4) guidance on measuring the fair value of financial instruments managed within a portfolio. In addition, the standard requires additional disclosures of the sensitivity of fair value to changes in unobservable inputs for Level 3 securities. This standard is effective for interim and annual reporting periods ending on or after December 15, 2011. The adoption of this guidance is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements. In June 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-05, "Presentation of Comprehensive Income", which requires that comprehensive income be presented either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. The standard also requires entities to disclose on the face of the financial statements reclassification adjustments for items that are reclassified from other comprehensive income to net earnings. This standard no longer allows companies to present components of other comprehensive income only in the statement of equity. This standard is effective for interim and annual reporting periods ending on or after December 15, 2011. The adoption of this guidance is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements other than the prescribed change in presentation.

X
- Details
Name: | us-gaap_AccountingPoliciesAbstract
Namespace Prefix: | us-gaap
Data Type: | xbrli:stringItemType
Balance Type: | na
Period Type: | duration

X
- Definition The entire disclosure for all significant accounting policies of the reporting entity. + References Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 235 -SubTopic 10 -Section 50 -Paragraph 2 -URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6367646&loc=d3e18743-107790 Reference 2: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 235 -SubTopic 10 -Section 50 -Paragraph 5 -URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6367646&loc=d3e18854-107790 Reference 3: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher AICPA -Name Accounting Principles Board Opinion (APB) -Number 22 -Paragraph 8 -LegacyDoc This reference is SUPERSEDED by the Accounting Standards Codification effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. This reference is included to help users transition from the previous accounting hierarchy and will be removed from future versions of this taxonomy. Reference 4: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 235 -SubTopic 10 -Section 50 -Paragraph 6 -URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6367646&loc=d3e18861-107790 Reference 5: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 235 -SubTopic 10 -Section 50 -Paragraph 3 -URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6367646&loc=d3e18780-107790 Reference 6: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 235 -SubTopic 10 -Section 50 -Paragraph 1 -URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6367646&loc=d3e18726-107790 + Details
Name: | us-gaap_SignificantAccountingPoliciesTextBlock
Namespace Prefix: | us-gaap
Data Type: | nonnum:textBlockItemType
Balance Type: | na
Period Type: | duration