v2.4.0.8

Commitments and Contingencies (Text Block) | 9 Months Ended
--- | ---
Sep. 30, 2014
Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract] |
Commitments and Contingencies [Text Block] | Commitments and Contingencies Guarantees and Indemnifications We are often required to obtain standby letters of credit (LOCs) or bonds in support of our obligations for customer contracts. These standby LOCs or bonds typically provide a guarantee to the customer for future performance, which usually covers the installation phase of a contract and may, on occasion, cover the operations and maintenance phase of outsourcing contracts. Our available lines of credit, outstanding standby LOCs, and bonds were as follows:
| September 30, 2014 |  | December 31, 2013
| (in thousands)
Credit facilities(1) |  |  |
Multicurrency revolving line of credit | $ | 660,000 |  |  | $ | 660,000 |
Long-term borrowings | (70,000 | ) |  | (120,000 | )
Standby LOCs issued and outstanding | (49,054 | ) |  | (49,491 | )
Net available for additional borrowings and LOCs | $ | 540,946 |  |  | $ | 490,509 |
Unsecured multicurrency revolving lines of credit with various financial institutions |  |  |
Multicurrency revolving lines of credit | $ | 103,617 |  |  | $ | 115,269 |
Standby LOCs issued and outstanding | (27,979 | ) |  | (31,714 | )
Short-term borrowings(2) | (7,138 | ) |  | (4,252 | )
Net available for additional borrowings and LOCs | $ | 68,500 |  |  | $ | 79,303 |
Unsecured surety bonds in force | $ | 140,550 |  |  | $ | 186,446 |
(1) | Refer to Note 6 for details regarding our secured credit facilities.
(2) | Short-term borrowings are included in "Other current liabilities" on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
In the event any such standby LOC or bond is called, we would be obligated to reimburse the issuer of the standby LOC or bond; however, we do not believe that any outstanding LOC or bond will be called. We generally provide an indemnification related to the infringement of any patent, copyright, trademark, or other intellectual property right on software or equipment within our sales contracts, which indemnifies the customer from and pays the resulting costs, damages, and attorney’s fees awarded against a customer with respect to such a claim provided that (a) the customer promptly notifies us in writing of the claim and (b) we have the sole control of the defense and all related settlement negotiations. We may also provide an indemnification to our customers for third party claims resulting from damages caused by the negligence or willful misconduct of our employees/agents in connection with the performance of certain contracts. The terms of our indemnifications generally do not limit the maximum potential payments. It is not possible to predict the maximum potential amount of future payments under these or similar agreements. Legal Matters We are subject to various legal proceedings and claims of which the outcomes are subject to significant uncertainty. Our policy is to assess the likelihood of any adverse judgments or outcomes related to legal matters, as well as ranges of probable losses. A determination of the amount of the liability required, if any, for these contingencies is made after an analysis of each known issue. A liability is recorded and charged to operating expense when we determine that a loss is probable and the amount can be reasonably estimated. Additionally, we disclose contingencies for which a material loss is reasonably possible, but not probable. In 2010 and 2011, Transdata Incorporated (Transdata) filed lawsuits against four of our customers, CenterPoint Energy (CenterPoint), TriCounty Electric Cooperative, Inc. (Tri-County), San Diego Gas & Electric Company (San Diego), and Texas-New Mexico Power Company (TNMP), as well as several other utilities, alleging infringement of three patents owned by Transdata related to the use of an antenna in a meter. Pursuant to our contractual obligations with our customers, we agreed, subject to certain exceptions, to indemnify and defend them in these lawsuits. The complaints seek unspecified damages as well as injunctive relief. CenterPoint, Tri-County, San Diego, and TNMP have denied all of the substantive allegations and filed counterclaims seeking a declaratory judgment that the patents are invalid and not infringed. In December 2011, the Judicial Panel on Multi-District Litigation consolidated all of these cases in the Western District of Oklahoma for pretrial proceedings. On April 17, 2011, the Oklahoma court stayed the litigation pending the resolution of re-examination proceedings in the United States Patent and Trademark Office (U.S. PTO). The U.S. PTO has issued re-examination certificates confirming the patentability of the original claims and allowing certain new claims added by Transdata. The parties conducted a claim construction hearing on February 5, 2013 on one claim term -- "electric meter circuitry." After initially adopting the defendants' proposed construction of the term, the Court granted Transdata's motion for reconsideration by order of June 25, 2013 and has adopted Transdata's proposed construction. On October 1, 2013, the Court issued an order construing other claim terms. Fact discovery closed on June 29, 2014. Opening and rebuttal expert reports have been served, and the parties are in the process of scheduling expert depositions. In addition, new requests for re-examination have been filed, and all Transdata claims contained in all three patents currently stand as rejected by the U.S. PTO in the re-examinations. Petitions for inter partes review have also been filed, but there has not yet been a decision on those petitions. Some of the defendants, including those we are defending, have sought a stay in light of the re-examination and inter partes review proceedings. That motion is pending. No trials are scheduled. We do not believe this matter will have a material adverse effect on our business or financial condition, although an unfavorable outcome could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations for the period in which such a loss is recognized. Itron and its subsidiaries are parties to various employment-related proceedings in jurisdictions where they do business. None of the proceedings are individually material to Itron, and we believe that we have made adequate provision such that the ultimate disposition of the proceedings will not materially affect Itron's business or financial condition. In a series of cases, approximately 300 former employees of Itron Sistemas e Technologia Ltda. (Itron Brazil), the majority of whose employment contracts were terminated in 2011, sued Itron Brazil seeking payment of overtime and salary differential and alleging that the assumption of the employment relationship by Itron Brazil constituted illegal outsourcing under Brazilian law. In 2008, Itron Brazil entered into an agreement to provide installation and maintenance services to one of its customers and, to perform such services, hired over 800 employees of the previous provider of such services. In 2011, Itron Brazil determined to terminate the contract with its customer, which led to the termination of approximately 870 employees. Under applicable statutes of limitation, most additional employee claims must have been brought prior to October 31, 2013. Itron Brazil intends to vigorously defend these cases. On October 31, 2013, we received a claim from one of our customers relating to alleged defects in meters sold to this customer since the year 2000. The customer asserts that it should be compensated for product and other related costs. We have engaged the customer in discussions to determine the factual basis for the claim. We are not yet able to estimate a potential range of loss. Currently, we do not believe that the outcome of this matter will have a material adverse effect on our business or financial condition, although an unfavorable outcome could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations for the period in which such a loss is recognized. On May 1, 2012, we completed the acquisition of SmartSynch, Inc. (SmartSynch). On or about April 25, 2012, SmartSynch entered into a contract with a third party (the Counterparty) to work with the Counterparty to develop jointly a new product that would be marketed and sold to potential SmartSynch customers. SmartSynch did not disclose to us prior to the closing of our acquisition of SmartSynch that it had entered into a material contract of this nature, which the Counterparty interprets as requiring payments totaling at least $60 million to it for license fees over a five-year term. On July 25, 2012, after receiving an invoice for license fees purportedly owed under the contract, we commenced an action against the Counterparty in the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware seeking a declaration that the contract was unenforceable or, in the alternative, seeking reformation of the contract. On August 21, 2012, the Counterparty filed an answer to the complaint, along with a counterclaim for breach of contract, among other claims, seeking damages in excess of $60 million. Each party filed additional pleadings and briefing. Discovery has been completed, and a trial has been scheduled for February 2015. We have been asserting our positions and defending against the counterclaim vigorously, and will continue to do so. We do not believe this matter will have a material adverse effect on our business or financial condition, although an unfavorable outcome could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations for the period in which such a loss is recognized. Warranty A summary of the warranty accrual account activity is as follows:
| Three Months Ended September 30, |  | Nine Months Ended September 30,
| 2014 |  | 2013 |  | 2014 |  | 2013
| (in thousands)
Beginning balance | $ | 42,549 |  |  | $ | 50,632 |  |  | $ | 45,146 |  |  | $ | 53,605 |
New product warranties | 2,278 |  |  | 1,761 |  |  | 4,992 |  |  | 4,583 |
Other changes/adjustments to warranties | 2,632 |  |  | 1,354 |  |  | 3,686 |  |  | 6,992 |
Claims activity | (5,605 | ) |  | (8,283 | ) |  | (12,113 | ) |  | (18,671 | )
Effect of change in exchange rates | (1,500 | ) |  | 567 |  |  | (1,357 | ) |  | (478 | )
Ending balance | 40,354 |  |  | 46,031 |  |  | 40,354 |  |  | 46,031 |
Less: current portion of warranty | 22,283 |  |  | 20,102 |  |  | 22,283 |  |  | 20,102 |
Long-term warranty | $ | 18,071 |  |  | $ | 25,929 |  |  | $ | 18,071 |  |  | $ | 25,929 |
Total warranty expense is classified within cost of revenues and consists of new product warranties issued, costs related to extended warranty contracts, and other changes and adjustments to warranties. Warranty expense for the three and nine months ended September 30 was as follows:
| Three Months Ended September 30, |  | Nine Months Ended September 30,
| 2014 |  | 2013 |  | 2014 |  | 2013
| (in thousands)
Total warranty expense | $ | 4,910 |  |  | $ | 3,115 |  |  | $ | 8,678 |  |  | $ | 11,575 |
Warranty expense increased during the three months ended September 30, 2014 compared with the same period in 2013 primarily due to special warranty provisions for several customers. Warranty expense decreased during the nine months ended September 30, 2014, compared with the same period in 2013 primarily due to a $5.1 million reduction in special warranty during the second quarter based on revised estimates for certain customers, partially offset by special warranty provisions in the third quarter. Unearned Revenue Related to Extended Warranty A summary of changes to unearned revenue for extended warranty contracts is as follows:
| Three Months Ended September 30, |  | Nine Months Ended September 30,
| 2014 |  | 2013 |  | 2014 |  | 2013
| (in thousands)
Beginning balance | $ | 33,958 |  |  | $ | 33,395 |  |  | $ | 33,528 |  |  | $ | 31,960 |
Unearned revenue for new extended warranties | 987 |  |  | 1,010 |  |  | 2,837 |  |  | 3,635 |
Unearned revenue recognized | (633 | ) |  | (597 | ) |  | (2,037 | ) |  | (1,592 | )
Effect of change in exchange rates | (121 | ) |  | 55 |  |  | (137 | ) |  | (140 | )
Ending balance | 34,191 |  |  | 33,863 |  |  | 34,191 |  |  | 33,863 |
Less: current portion of unearned revenue for extended warranty | 2,592 |  |  | 2,454 |  |  | 2,592 |  |  | 2,454 |
Long-term unearned revenue for extended warranty within other long-term obligations | $ | 31,599 |  |  | $ | 31,409 |  |  | $ | 31,599 |  |  | $ | 31,409 |
Health Benefits We are self insured for a substantial portion of the cost of our U.S. employee group health insurance. We purchase insurance from a third party, which provides individual and aggregate stop-loss protection for these costs. Each reporting period, we expense the costs of our health insurance plan including paid claims, the change in the estimate of incurred but not reported (IBNR) claims, taxes, and administrative fees (collectively, the plan costs). Plan costs were as follows:
| Three Months Ended September 30, |  | Nine Months Ended September 30,
| 2014 |  | 2013 |  | 2014 |  | 2013
| (in thousands)
Plan costs | $ | 5,694 |  |  | $ | 6,141 |  |  | $ | 16,670 |  |  | $ | 16,641 |
The IBNR accrual, which is included in wages and benefits payable, was as follows:
| September 30, 2014 |  | December 31, 2013
| (in thousands)
IBNR accrual | $ | 1,868 |  |  | $ | 2,206 |
Our IBNR accrual and expenses may fluctuate due to the number of plan participants, claims activity, and deductible limits. For our employees located outside of the United States, health benefits are provided primarily through governmental social plans, which are funded through employee and employer tax withholdings.

X
- Details
Name: | us-gaap_CommitmentsAndContingenciesDisclosureAbstract
Namespace Prefix: | us-gaap_
Data Type: | xbrli:stringItemType
Balance Type: | na
Period Type: | duration

X
- Definition The entire disclosure for commitments and contingencies. + References Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 210 -SubTopic 10 -Section S99 -Paragraph 1 -Subparagraph (SX 210.5-02.25) -URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6877327&loc=d3e13212-122682 Reference 2: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 825 -SubTopic 20 -Section 50 -Paragraph 1 -URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6449706&loc=d3e16207-108621 Reference 3: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 460 -SubTopic 10 -Section 50 -Paragraph 8 -URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6398077&loc=d3e12565-110249 Reference 4: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 450 -SubTopic 20 -Section 50 -Paragraph 4 -URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=25496072&loc=d3e14435-108349 Reference 5: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 440 -SubTopic 10 -Section 50 -Paragraph 2 -URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6394976&loc=d3e25287-109308 + Details
Name: | us-gaap_CommitmentsAndContingenciesDisclosureTextBlock
Namespace Prefix: | us-gaap_
Data Type: | nonnum:textBlockItemType
Balance Type: | na
Period Type: | duration