XML 39 R24.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT
v3.6.0.2

Asset Impairments | 12 Months Ended
--- | ---
Dec. 31, 2016
Goodwill and Intangible Assets Disclosure [Abstract] |
ASSET IMPAIRMENTS | ASSET IMPAIRMENTS The Company performs its annual impairment assessment of the carrying value of its goodwill and intangible franchise rights as of October 31st of each year. The Company also performs interim reviews of all of its long-lived and indefinite-lived assets for impairment when evidence exists that the carrying value may not be recoverable. In the Company’s 2016 annual goodwill assessment, the fair value of each of its reporting units exceeded the carrying value of its net assets (step one of the goodwill impairment test). As a result, the Company was not required to conduct the second step of the impairment test for goodwill. If, in future periods, the Company determines that the carrying amount of its net assets exceeds the respective fair value of its goodwill for any or all of its reporting units, the Company could be required to recognize a material non-cash impairment charge to the goodwill associated with the reporting unit(s). During 2016, the Company also completed other impairment assessments on an annual and interim basis, as applicable, and recorded the following non-cash impairment charges, all of which are reflected in asset impairments in the accompanying Consolidated Statement of Operations:
• | The Company determined that the carrying values of certain of its intangible franchise rights were greater than the fair value and, as a result, recognized a $30.0 million pre-tax non-cash asset impairment charge.
• | In addition, the Company determined that the carrying amounts of various real estate holdings and other long-lived assets were no longer fully recoverable, and recognized $2.8 million in pre-tax non-cash asset impairment charges.
If any of the Company’s assumptions change, or fail to materialize, the resulting decline in its estimated fair market value of intangible franchise rights could result in a material non-cash impairment charge. For example, the Company performed two separate sensitivity analyses on its 2016 annual impairment assessment of goodwill and intangible franchise rights. If the Company’s assumptions regarding the risk-free rate and cost of debt differed such that the estimated WACC used in its 2016 assessment increased by 200 basis points, and all other assumptions remained constant, an additional $40.2 million of non-cash franchise rights impairment charges would have resulted, excluding franchises acquired since the previous annual test. This additional impairment would have consisted of $37.6 million in the U.S., $0.4 million in the U.K. and $2.2 million in Brazil. The Company’s Brazil reporting unit would have failed the step one impairment test for goodwill in this scenario, while the U.S. and U.K reporting units would have passed step one. The Company’s second sensitivity analysis represented a recessionary sales environment in the U.S., utilizing the U.S. SAAR equivalent to 2009 levels for 2018. Similar industry sales levels were also applied to the U.K. reporting unit. Since Brazil is currently in a recessionary economy, the Company did not assume further industry sales declines for this sensitivity analysis, but instead assumed no sales growth in 2018. In this sensitivity analysis, an additional $55.3 million of non-cash franchise rights impairment charges would have resulted, including $52.8 million, $1.6 million and $0.9 million for the U.S., U.K. and Brazil, respectively. In this scenario, none of the Company’s reporting units would have failed the step one impairment test for goodwill. In the Company’s 2015 goodwill assessment, the fair value of its two U.S. reporting units, as well as the U.K. reporting unit, exceeded the carrying value of its net assets (i.e., step one of the goodwill impairment test). As a result, the Company was not required to conduct the second step of the impairment test for goodwill relating to its two U.S. and U.K. reporting units. The Brazil reporting unit’s fair value did not exceed the carrying value of its net assets. As a result, the Company performed a step two analysis for this reporting unit, measured the estimated fair value of the reporting unit’s assets and liabilities as of the test date using level 3 inputs and compared the resulting implied fair value of the reporting unit’s goodwill to its carrying value. As a result of the carrying value of goodwill exceeding the implied fair value, a $55.4 million impairment was recorded as of December 31, 2015. During 2015, the Company also completed other impairment assessments on an annual or interim basis, as applicable, and recorded the following non-cash impairment charges, all of which are reflected in asset impairments in the accompanying Consolidated Statement of Operations:
• | The Company determined that the carrying values of certain of its intangible franchise rights were greater than the fair value and, as a result, recognized a $30.1 million pre-tax non-cash asset impairment charge.
• | In addition, the Company determined that the carrying amounts of various real estate holdings were no longer recoverable, and recognized $1.3 million in pre-tax non-cash asset impairment charges.
• | The Company also determined that the carrying values of various other long-term assets were no longer recoverable, and recognized $0.8 million in pre-tax non-cash asset impairment charges.
In the Company’s 2014 goodwill assessment, the fair value of each of its reporting units exceeded the carrying value of its net assets (step one of the goodwill impairment test). As a result, the Company was not required to conduct the second step of the impairment test for goodwill. During 2014, the Company completed other impairment assessments on an annual or interim basis, as applicable, and recorded the following non-cash impairment charges, all of which are reflected in asset impairments in the accompanying Consolidated Statement of Operations:
• | Primarily related to the Company’s determination that the carrying values of certain of its intangible franchise rights were greater than the fair value, the Company recognized a $31.0 million pre-tax non-cash asset impairment charge.
• | In addition, the Company determined that the carrying amounts of various real estate holdings were no longer recoverable, and recognized $9.2 million in pre-tax non-cash asset impairment charges.
• | The Company also determined that the carrying values of various other long-term assets were no longer recoverable, and recognized $1.3 million in pre-tax non-cash asset impairment charges.

X
- Definition The entire disclosure for the details of the charge against earnings resulting from the aggregate write down of all assets from their carrying value to their fair value. Disclosure may also include a description of the impaired asset and facts and circumstances leading to the impairment, amount of the impairment loss and where the loss is located in the income statement, method(s) for determining fair value, and the segment in which the impaired asset is reported. + References No definition available. + Details
Name: | us-gaap_AssetImpairmentChargesTextBlock
Namespace Prefix: | us-gaap_
Data Type: | nonnum:textBlockItemType
Balance Type: | na
Period Type: | duration

X
- References No definition available. + Details
Name: | us-gaap_GoodwillAndIntangibleAssetsDisclosureAbstract
Namespace Prefix: | us-gaap_
Data Type: | xbrli:stringItemType
Balance Type: | na
Period Type: | duration