XML 64 R13.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.8
Goodwill
9 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2013
Goodwill And Intangible Assets Disclosure [Abstract]  
Goodwill

5. Goodwill

Changes in the carrying amount of goodwill during the nine months ended September 30, 2013, were as follows (in thousands):

 

     Americas     EMEA      Asia/
Pacific
    Total  

Gross Balance prior to December 31, 2012

   $ 316,222      $ 158,653       $ 73,698      $ 548,573   

Total impairment prior to December 31, 2012

     (47,432     —           —          (47,432
  

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Balance as of December 31, 2012

     268,790        158,653         73,698        501,141   

Goodwill from acquisitions (1)

     133,998        —           (832     133,166   

Foreign currency translation adjustments

     (483     638         (3,723     (3,568
  

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Balance as of September 30, 2013

   $ 402,305      $ 159,291       $ 69,143      $ 630,739   
  

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

(1) Addition relates to the goodwill acquired in the acquisition of ORCC and PTESA as discussed in Note 2 as well as adjustments to Distra. The purchase price allocations for ORCC and PTESA are preliminary as of September 30, 2013 and accordingly are subject to future changes during the maximum one-year allocation period. The purchase price allocation for Distra was finalized during the nine months ended September 30, 2013.

In accordance with ASC 350, Intangibles – Goodwill and Other, we assess goodwill for impairment annually during the fourth quarter of our fiscal year using October 1 balances or when there is evidence that events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the asset may not be recovered. We evaluate goodwill at the reporting unit level and have identified our reportable segments, Americas, EMEA, and Asia/Pacific, as our reporting units. Recoverability of goodwill is measured using a discounted cash flow model incorporating discount rates commensurate with the risks involved. Use of a discounted cash flow model is common practice in impairment testing in the absence of available transactional market evidence to determine the fair value.

The calculated fair value was substantially in excess of the current carrying value for all reporting units based upon our October 1, 2012 annual impairment test and there have been no indications of impairment in the subsequent periods.