XML 88 R19.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT
v2.4.0.8

Pension and Other Postretirement Benefit Plans | 12 Months Ended
--- | ---
Dec. 31, 2013
General Discussion of Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits [Abstract] |
Pension and Other Postretirement Benefit Plans | PENSION AND OTHER POSTRETIREMENT BENEFIT PLANS We have funded and unfunded defined benefit pension plans that cover certain employees in North America, Europe, Asia and Brazil. The United States plans are frozen for the majority of participants. The formula for United States salaried employees covered under the qualified defined benefit plan was based on years of service and final average salary, while the formula for United States hourly employees covered under the defined benefit plans was based on specific dollar amounts for each year of service. There were multiple formulas for employees covered under the qualified and nonqualified defined benefit plans sponsored by Maytag, including a cash balance formula. In addition, we sponsor an unfunded Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan. This plan is nonqualified and provides certain key employees defined pension benefits that supplement those provided by the company’s other retirement plans. A defined contribution plan is being provided to all United States employees subsequent to the pension plan freezes and is not classified within the net periodic benefit cost. The company provides annual match and automatic company contributions, in cash or company stock, of up to 7% of employees’ eligible pay. Our contributions during 2013, 2012 and 2011 were $68 million, $64 million and $68 million, respectively. We provide postretirement health care benefits for eligible retired employees in the United States, Canada and Brazil. For our United States plan, which comprises the majority of our obligation, eligible retirees include those who were full-time employees with 10 years of service who attained age 55 while in service with us and those union retirees who met the eligibility requirements of their collective bargaining agreements. In general, the postretirement health and welfare benefit plans include cost-sharing provisions that limit our exposure for recent and future retirees and are contributory, with participants’ contributions adjusted annually. The plans are unfunded. We reserve the right to modify these benefits in the future. Defined Benefit - Pensions and Postretirement Benefit Plans Obligations and Funded Status at End of Year
|  | United States Pension Benefits |  | Foreign Pension Benefits |  | Other Postretirement Benefits
Millions of dollars |  | 2013 |  | 2012 |  | 2013 |  | 2012 |  | 2013 |  | 2012
Funded status |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Fair value of plan assets |  | $ | 2,835 |  |  | $ | 2,790 |  |  | $ | 206 |  |  | $ | 197 |  |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | — |
Benefit obligations |  | 3,546 |  |  | 4,196 |  |  | 439 |  |  | 448 |  |  | 509 |  |  | 477 |
Funded status |  | $ | (711 | ) |  | $ | (1,406 | ) |  | $ | (233 | ) |  | $ | (251 | ) |  | $ | (509 | ) |  | $ | (477 | )
Amounts recognized in the consolidated balance sheet |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Noncurrent asset |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | 7 |  |  | $ | 5 |  |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | — |
Current liability |  | (7 | ) |  | (7 | ) |  | (14 | ) |  | (19 | ) |  | (51 | ) |  | (55 | )
Noncurrent liability |  | (704 | ) |  | (1,399 | ) |  | (226 | ) |  | (237 | ) |  | (458 | ) |  | (422 | )
Amount recognized |  | $ | (711 | ) |  | $ | (1,406 | ) |  | $ | (233 | ) |  | $ | (251 | ) |  | $ | (509 | ) |  | $ | (477 | )
Amounts recognized in accumulated other comprehensive loss (pre-tax) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Net actuarial loss (gain) |  | $ | 1,215 |  |  | $ | 1,761 |  |  | $ | 98 |  |  | $ | 119 |  |  | $ | 42 |  |  | $ | 27 |
Prior service (credit) cost |  | (17 | ) |  | (20 | ) |  | 3 |  |  | 4 |  |  | (169 | ) |  | (210 | )
Transition (asset) obligation |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | (1 | ) |  | — |  |  | — |
Amount recognized |  | $ | 1,198 |  |  | $ | 1,741 |  |  | $ | 101 |  |  | $ | 122 |  |  | $ | (127 | ) |  | $ | (183 | )
Change in Benefit Obligation
|  | United States Pension Benefits |  | Foreign Pension Benefits |  | Other Postretirement Benefits
Millions of dollars |  | 2013 |  | 2012 |  | 2013 |  | 2012 |  | 2013 |  | 2012
Benefit obligation, beginning of year |  | $ | 4,196 |  |  | $ | 3,872 |  |  | $ | 448 |  |  | $ | 373 |  |  | $ | 477 |  |  | $ | 488 |
Service cost |  | 2 |  |  | 2 |  |  | 6 |  |  | 6 |  |  | 4 |  |  | 5 |
Interest cost |  | 162 |  |  | 178 |  |  | 17 |  |  | 20 |  |  | 18 |  |  | 21 |
Plan participants’ contributions |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 1 |  |  | 1 |  |  | 8 |  |  | 9 |
Actuarial loss (gain) |  | (420 | ) |  | 425 |  |  | (7 | ) |  | 65 |  |  | (31 | ) |  | 25 |
Benefits paid, net of federal subsidy |  | (281 | ) |  | (270 | ) |  | (23 | ) |  | (21 | ) |  | (68 | ) |  | (64 | )
Plan amendments |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 2 |  |  | (2 | )
Acquisitions / divestitures |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | (2 | ) |  | — |  |  | — |
New plans |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 14 |  |  | — |  |  | — |
Transfer of benefits |  | (105 | ) |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 105 |  |  | — |
Settlements / curtailment (gain) |  | (8 | ) |  | (11 | ) |  | (6 | ) |  | (17 | ) |  | — |  |  | (2 | )
Foreign currency exchange rates |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 3 |  |  | 9 |  |  | (6 | ) |  | (3 | )
Benefit obligation, end of year |  | $ | 3,546 |  |  | $ | 4,196 |  |  | $ | 439 |  |  | $ | 448 |  |  | $ | 509 |  |  | $ | 477 |
Accumulated benefit obligation, end of year |  | $ | 3,536 |  |  | $ | 4,181 |  |  | $ | 424 |  |  | $ | 428 |  |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | — |
During the fourth quarter 2013, we transferred $105 million of ancillary benefits, as allowed under ERISA, out of our United States qualified pension plans and into our United States retiree health and welfare benefit plan. The transfer had no impact on our Consolidated Financial Statements as of December 31, 2013. During the second quarter 2011, we modified retiree medical benefits for certain retirees to be consistent with those benefits provided by the Whirlpool Corporation Group Benefit Plan. We accounted for these changes as a plan amendment in 2011, resulting in a reduction in the postretirement benefit obligation of $138 million with an offset to accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax. In response, a group of retirees has initiated legal proceedings against Whirlpool asserting the above benefits are vested. We believe the outcome of the legal proceedings against Whirlpool will not have a material adverse effect on our Consolidated Financial Statements. Change in Plan Assets
|  | United States Pension Benefits |  | Foreign Pension Benefits |  | Other Postretirement Benefits
Millions of dollars |  | 2013 |  | 2012 |  | 2013 |  | 2012 |  | 2013 |  | 2012
Fair value of plan assets, beginning of year |  | $ | 2,790 |  |  | $ | 2,573 |  |  | $ | 197 |  |  | $ | 170 |  |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | — |
Actual return on plan assets |  | 207 |  |  | 317 |  |  | 13 |  |  | 19 |  |  | — |  |  | — |
Employer contribution |  | 127 |  |  | 181 |  |  | 24 |  |  | 27 |  |  | 60 |  |  | 55 |
Plan participants’ contributions |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 1 |  |  | 1 |  |  | 8 |  |  | 9 |
Gross benefits paid |  | (281 | ) |  | (270 | ) |  | (23 | ) |  | (21 | ) |  | (68 | ) |  | (64 | )
New plans |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 2 |  |  | 14 |  |  | — |  |  | — |
Settlements |  | (8 | ) |  | (11 | ) |  | (6 | ) |  | (17 | ) |  | — |  |  | — |
Foreign currency exchange rates |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | (2 | ) |  | 4 |  |  | — |  |  | — |
Fair value of plan assets, end of year |  | $ | 2,835 |  |  | $ | 2,790 |  |  | $ | 206 |  |  | $ | 197 |  |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | — |
Components of Net Periodic Benefit Cost
|  | United States Pension Benefits |  | Foreign Pension Benefits |  | Other Postretirement Benefits
Millions of dollars |  | 2013 |  | 2012 |  | 2011 |  | 2013 |  | 2012 |  | 2011 |  | 2013 |  | 2012 |  | 2011
Service cost |  | $ | 2 |  |  | $ | 2 |  |  | $ | 2 |  |  | $ | 6 |  |  | $ | 6 |  |  | $ | 7 |  |  | $ | 4 |  |  | $ | 5 |  |  | $ | 8 |
Interest cost |  | 162 |  |  | 178 |  |  | 192 |  |  | 17 |  |  | 20 |  |  | 20 |  |  | 18 |  |  | 21 |  |  | 31 |
Expected return on plan assets |  | (191 | ) |  | (194 | ) |  | (194 | ) |  | (10 | ) |  | (11 | ) |  | (10 | ) |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |
Amortization: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Actuarial loss |  | 62 |  |  | 46 |  |  | 31 |  |  | 6 |  |  | 4 |  |  | 4 |  |  | 1 |  |  | 1 |  |  | 1 |
Prior service cost (credit) |  | (3 | ) |  | (3 | ) |  | (3 | ) |  | 1 |  |  | 1 |  |  | 1 |  |  | (39 | ) |  | (42 | ) |  | (43 | )
Curtailment gain |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | (52 | ) |  | (35 | )
Settlement loss |  | 3 |  |  | 5 |  |  | — |  |  | 1 |  |  | 3 |  |  | 2 |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |
Net periodic benefit cost |  | $ | 35 |  |  | $ | 34 |  |  | $ | 28 |  |  | $ | 21 |  |  | $ | 23 |  |  | $ | 24 |  |  | $ | (16 | ) |  | $ | (67 | ) |  | $ | (38 | )
On October 27, 2011 we announced the closure of our manufacturing facilities in Fort Smith, Arkansas and on August 28, 2009, we announced the closure of our manufacturing facility in Evansville, Indiana. Both closures triggered a curtailment in our United States retiree health and welfare benefit plan, resulting in curtailment gains of $52 million and $35 million in 2012 and 2011, respectively. The curtailment gains were recognized in our Consolidated Statements of Income as a component of cost of products sold with an offset to accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax. Other Changes in Plan Assets and Benefit Obligations Recognized in Other Comprehensive Loss (Pre-Tax) in 2013
Millions of dollars |  | United States Pension Benefits |  | Foreign Pension Benefits |  | Other Postretirement Benefits
Current year actuarial (gain) loss |  | $ | (481 | ) |  | $ | (10 | ) |  | $ | 16 |
Actuarial (loss) gain recognized during the year |  | (65 | ) |  | (10 | ) |  | (1 | )
Current year prior service cost (credit) |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 2 |
Prior service credit (cost) recognized during the year |  | 3 |  |  | (1 | ) |  | 39 |
Total recognized in other comprehensive loss (pre-tax) |  | $ | (543 | ) |  | $ | (21 | ) |  | $ | 56 |
Total recognized in net periodic benefit costs and other comprehensive loss (pre-tax) |  | $ | (508 | ) |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | 40 |
Estimated Pre-Tax Amounts that will be amortized from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss into Net Periodic Pension Cost in 2014
Millions of dollars |  | United States Pension Benefits |  | Foreign Pension Benefits |  | Other Postretirement Benefits
Actuarial loss |  | $ | 43 |  |  | $ | 6 |  |  | $ | — |
Prior service (credit) cost |  | (3 | ) |  | 1 |  |  | (39 | )
Total |  | $ | 40 |  |  | $ | 7 |  |  | $ | (39 | )
Assumptions Weighted-average assumptions used to determine benefit obligation at end of year
|  | United States Pension Benefits |  | Foreign Pension Benefits |  | Other Postretirement Benefits
|  | 2013 |  | 2012 |  | 2013 |  | 2012 |  | 2013 |  | 2012
Discount rate |  | 4.95 | % |  | 4.05 | % |  | 4.16 | % |  | 3.93 | % |  | 4.95 | % |  | 4.03 | %
Rate of compensation increase |  | 4.50 | % |  | 4.50 | % |  | 3.40 | % |  | 3.51 | % |  | — |  |  | — |
Weighted-average assumptions used to determine net periodic cost
|  | United States Pension Benefits |  | Foreign Pension Benefits |  | Other Postretirement Benefits
|  | 2013 |  | 2012 |  | 2011 |  | 2013 |  | 2012 |  | 2011 |  | 2013 |  | 2012 |  | 2011
Discount rate |  | 4.05 | % |  | 4.80 | % |  | 5.60 | % |  | 3.93 | % |  | 5.04 | % |  | 5.20 | % |  | 4.03 | % |  | 5.03 | % |  | 5.60 | %
Expected long-term rate of return on plan assets |  | 7.50 | % |  | 7.50 | % |  | 7.75 | % |  | 5.40 | % |  | 5.44 | % |  | 5.40 | % |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |
Rate of compensation increase |  | 4.50 | % |  | 4.50 | % |  | 4.50 | % |  | 3.51 | % |  | 3.48 | % |  | 3.50 | % |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |
Health care cost trend rate |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Initial rate |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 7.00 | % |  | 8.00 | % |  | 8.00 | %
Ultimate rate |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 5.00 | % |  | 5.00 | % |  | 5.00 | %
Year that ultimate rate will be reached |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 2017 |  |  | 2015 |  |  | 2015 |
Discount rate For our United States pension and postretirement benefit plans, the discount rate was selected using a hypothetical portfolio of high quality bonds outstanding at December 31 that would provide the necessary cash flows to match our projected benefit payments. For our foreign pension and postretirement benefit plans, the discount rate was selected using high quality bond yields for the respective country or region covered by the plan. Expected return on plan assets In the United States, the expected rate of return on plan assets was determined by using the historical asset returns for publicly traded equity and fixed income securities tracked since 1926 and the historical returns for private equity. The historical equity returns were adjusted downward to reflect future expectations. The expected returns are weighted by the targeted asset allocations. The resulting weighted-average return was rounded to the nearest quarter of one percent. For foreign pension plans, the expected rate of return on plan assets was primarily determined by observing historical returns in the local fixed income and equity markets and computing the weighted average returns with the weights being the asset allocation of each plan. Estimated impact of one percentage-point change in assumed health care cost trend rate A one percentage point change in assumed health care cost trend rates would have the following effects on our health care plan:
Millions of dollars |  | One Percentage Point Increase |  | One Percentage Point Decrease
Effect on total of service and interest cost |  | $ | 1 |  |  | $ | (1 | )
Effect on postretirement benefit obligations |  | 5 |  |  | (5 | )
Cash Flows Funding Policy Our funding policy is to contribute to our United States pension plans amounts sufficient to meet the minimum funding requirement as defined by employee benefit and tax laws, plus additional amounts which we may determine to be appropriate. In certain countries other than the United States, the funding of pension plans is not common practice. Contributions to our United States pension plans may be made in the form of cash or company stock. We pay for retiree medical benefits as they are incurred. Expected Employer Contributions to Funded Plans
Millions of dollars |  | United States Pension Benefits(1) |  | Foreign Pension Benefits
2014 |  | $ | 160 |  |  | $ | 11 |
1 | Contributions include $160 million of minimum contributions required by law.
Expected Benefit Payments
Millions of dollars |  | United States Pension Benefits |  | Foreign Pension Benefits |  | Other Postretirement Benefits
2014 |  | $ | 274 |  |  | $ | 28 |  |  | $ | 51 |
2015 |  | 245 |  |  | 32 |  |  | 52 |
2016 |  | 248 |  |  | 22 |  |  | 51 |
2017 |  | 246 |  |  | 26 |  |  | 49 |
2018 |  | 247 |  |  | 25 |  |  | 44 |
2019-2023 |  | 1,230 |  |  | 131 |  |  | 187 |
Plan Assets Our overall investment strategy is to achieve an appropriate mix of investments for long-term growth and for near-term benefit payments with a wide diversification of asset types, fund strategies, and investment fund managers. The target allocation for plan assets is generally 42% equity and 58% fixed income, with exceptions for certain foreign pension plans. For our U.S. plan, the target allocation for equity securities is approximately 50% allocated to United States large-cap, 28% to international equity, 14% to United States mid and small-cap companies and 8% in venture capital. The target allocation for fixed income is allocated with 75% to corporate bonds and 25% to United States treasury and other government securities. The fixed income securities duration is intended to match that of our United States pension liabilities. Plan assets are reported at fair value based on an exit price, representing the amount that would be received to sell an asset in an orderly transaction between market participants. As such, fair value is a market-based measurement that should be determined based on assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset. As a basis for considering such assumptions, a three-tiered fair value hierarchy is established, which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value as follows: (Level 1) observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets; (Level 2) inputs, other than the quoted prices in active markets that are observable, either directly or indirectly; and (Level 3) unobservable inputs in which there is little or no market data, which require the reporting entity to develop its own assumptions. We manage the process and approve the results of a third party pricing service to value the majority of our securities and to determine the appropriate level in the fair value hierarchy. The fair values of our pension plan assets at December 31, 2013 and 2012, by asset category were as follows:
|  | December 31,
Millions of dollars |  | Quoted prices (Level 1) |  | Other significant observable inputs (Level 2) |  | Significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) |  | Total
|  | 2013 |  | 2012 |  | 2013 |  | 2012 |  | 2013 |  | 2012 |  | 2013 |  | 2012
Cash and equivalents |  | $ | 23 |  |  | $ | 15 |  |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | 23 |  |  | $ | 15 |
Government and government agency securities(a) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
U.S. securities |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 432 |  |  | 433 |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 432 |  |  | 433 |
International securities |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 131 |  |  | 104 |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 131 |  |  | 104 |
Corporate bonds and notes (a) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
U.S. companies |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 850 |  |  | 751 |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 850 |  |  | 751 |
International companies |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 193 |  |  | 176 |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 193 |  |  | 176 |
Equity securities (b) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
U.S. companies |  | 12 |  |  | 217 |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 12 |  |  | 217 |
International companies |  | 223 |  |  | 233 |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 223 |  |  | 233 |
Mutual funds (c) |  | 77 |  |  | 100 |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 77 |  |  | 100 |
Common and collective funds (d) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
U.S. equity securities |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 718 |  |  | 589 |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 718 |  |  | 589 |
International equity securities |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 79 |  |  | 106 |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 79 |  |  | 106 |
Short-term investment fund |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 87 |  |  | 49 |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 87 |  |  | 49 |
Limited partnerships (e) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
U.S. private equity investments |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 145 |  |  | 143 |  |  | 145 |  |  | 143 |
Diversified fund of funds |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 35 |  |  | 38 |  |  | 35 |  |  | 38 |
Emerging growth |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 18 |  |  | 15 |  |  | 18 |  |  | 15 |
Real estate (f) |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 11 |  |  | 10 |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 11 |  |  | 10 |
All other investments |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 7 |  |  | 8 |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 7 |  |  | 8 |
|  | $ | 335 |  |  | $ | 565 |  |  | $ | 2,508 |  |  | $ | 2,226 |  |  | $ | 198 |  |  | $ | 196 |  |  | $ | 3,041 |  |  | $ | 2,987 |
(a) | Valued using pricing vendors who use proprietary models to estimate the price a dealer would pay to buy a security using significant observable inputs, such as interest rates, yield curves, and credit risk.
(b) | Valued using the closing stock price on a national securities exchange, which reflects the last reported sales price on the last business day of the year.
(c) | Valued using the net asset value (NAV) of the fund, which is based on the fair value of underlying securities. The fund primarily invests in a diversified portfolio of equity securities issued by non-U.S. companies.
(d) | Valued using the NAV of the fund, which is based on the fair value of underlying securities.
(e) | Valued at estimated fair value based on the proportionate share of the limited partnerships fair value, as determined by the general partner.
(f) | Valued using the NAV of the fund, which is based on the fair value of underlying assets.
Fair Value Measurements Using Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
Millions of dollars |  | Limited Partnerships
Balance, December 31, 2012 |  | $ | 196 |
Realized gains (net) |  | 16 |
Unrealized gains (net) |  | 10 |
Purchases |  | 14 |
Settlements |  | (38 | )
Balance, December 31, 2013 |  | $ | 198 |
Additional Information The projected benefit obligation and fair value of plan assets for pension plans with a projected benefit obligation in excess of plan assets at December 31, 2013 and 2012 were as follows:
|  | United States Pension Benefits |  | Foreign Pension Benefits
Millions of dollars |  | 2013 |  | 2012 |  | 2013 |  | 2012
Projected benefit obligation |  | $ | 3,546 |  |  | $ | 4,196 |  |  | $ | 397 |  |  | $ | 374 |
Fair value of plan assets |  | 2,835 |  |  | 2,790 |  |  | 157 |  |  | 117 |
The projected benefit obligation, accumulated benefit obligation and fair value of plan assets for pension plans with an accumulated benefit obligation in excess of plan assets at December 31, 2013 and 2012 were as follows:
|  | United States Pension Benefits |  | Foreign Pension Benefits
Millions of dollars |  | 2013 |  | 2012 |  | 2013 |  | 2012
Projected benefit obligation |  | $ | 3,546 |  |  | $ | 4,196 |  |  | $ | 347 |  |  | $ | 359 |
Accumulated benefit obligation |  | 3,536 |  |  | 4,181 |  |  | 340 |  |  | 346 |
Fair value of plan assets |  | 2,835 |  |  | 2,790 |  |  | 110 |  |  | 105 |

X
- Details
Name: | us-gaap_GeneralDiscussionOfPensionAndOtherPostretirementBenefitsAbstract
Namespace Prefix: | us-gaap_
Data Type: | xbrli:stringItemType
Balance Type: | na
Period Type: | duration

X
- Definition The entire disclosure for pension and other postretirement benefits. + References Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 715 -URI http://asc.fasb.org/topic&trid=2235017 + Details
Name: | us-gaap_PensionAndOtherPostretirementBenefitsDisclosureTextBlock
Namespace Prefix: | us-gaap_
Data Type: | nonnum:textBlockItemType
Balance Type: | na
Period Type: | duration