XML 75 R28.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.19.3.a.u2
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Policies)
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2019
Accounting Policies [Abstract]  
Principles of Consolidation

Principles of Consolidation

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Alkermes plc and its wholly-owned subsidiaries: Alkermes Ireland Holdings Limited; Daravita Pharma Ireland Limited; Daravita Limited; Alkermes Science Four Limited; Alkermes Science Five Limited; Alkermes Pharma Ireland Limited; Alkermes U.S. Holdings, Inc.; Alkermes, Inc.; Alkermes Controlled Therapeutics, Inc.; Alkermes Europe, Ltd.; Alkermes Finance Ireland Limited; Alkermes Finance Ireland (No. 2) Limited; Alkermes Finance Ireland (No. 3) Limited; Alkermes Finance S.à r.l; and Rodin Therapeutics, Inc. Intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated.

Use of Estimates

Use of Estimates

The preparation of the Company’s consolidated financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”) requires that Company management make estimates, judgments and assumptions that may affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. On an on‑going basis, the Company evaluates its estimates and judgments and methodologies, including those related to revenue from contracts with its customers and related allowances, impairment and amortization of intangibles and long‑lived assets, share‑based compensation, income taxes including the valuation allowance for deferred tax assets, valuation of investments, contingent consideration and litigation. The Company bases its estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

Cash and Cash Equivalents

The Company values its cash and cash equivalents at cost plus accrued interest, which the Company believes approximates their market value. The Company considers only those investments which are highly liquid, readily convertible into cash and so near their maturity, generally three months from the date of purchase, that they present insignificant risk of change in value because of interest rate changes to be cash equivalents.

Investments

Investments

The Company has investments in various types of securities, consisting primarily of United States (“U.S.”) government and agency obligations, corporate debt securities and debt securities issued by foreign agencies and backed by foreign governments. The Company generally holds its interest-bearing investments with major financial institutions and in accordance with documented investment policies. The Company limits the amount of credit exposure to any one financial institution or corporate issuer. At December 31, 2019, substantially all these investments were classified as available for sale and were recorded at fair value.

Holding gains and losses on available-for-sale investments are considered “unrealized” and are reported within “Accumulated other comprehensive loss,” a component of shareholders’ equity. The Company uses the specific identification method for reclassifying unrealized gains and losses into earnings when investments are sold. The Company conducts periodic reviews to identify and evaluate each investment that has an unrealized loss, in accordance with the meaning of other-than-temporary impairment and its application to certain investments, as required by GAAP. An unrealized loss exists when the current fair value of an individual security is less than its amortized cost basis. Unrealized losses on available-for-sale securities that are determined to be temporary, and not related to credit loss, are recorded in “Accumulated other comprehensive loss.”

For securities with unrealized losses, the Company performs an analysis to assess whether it intends to sell or whether it would more likely than not be required to sell the security before the expected recovery of its amortized cost basis. If the Company intends to sell a security, or may be required to do so, the security’s decline in fair value is deemed to be other-than-temporary and the full amount of the unrealized loss is recorded within earnings as an impairment loss. Regardless of the Company’s intent to sell a security, the Company performs additional analysis on all securities with unrealized losses to evaluate losses associated with the creditworthiness of the security. Credit losses are identified where the Company does not expect to receive cash flows sufficient to recover the amortized cost basis of a security.

The Company's held-to-maturity investments are restricted investments held as collateral under letters of credit related to certain of the Company's agreements and are included in “Investments—long-term,” in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The Company’s financial assets and liabilities are recorded at fair value and are classified as Level 1, 2 or 3 within the fair value hierarchy, as described in the accounting standards for fair value measurement. At December 31, 2019, the Company’s financial assets consisted of cash equivalents, investments and contingent consideration and are classified within the fair value hierarchy as follows:

 

Level 1–these valuations are based on a market approach using quoted prices in active markets for identical assets. Valuations of these products do not require a significant degree of judgment. Assets utilizing Level 1 inputs at December 31, 2019 included U.S. treasury securities, marketable securities classified as cash equivalents and a fixed term deposit account;

 

Level 2–these valuations are based on a market approach using quoted prices obtained from brokers or dealers for similar securities or for securities for which the Company has limited visibility into their trading volumes. Valuations of these financial instruments do not require a significant degree of judgment. Assets utilizing Level 2 inputs at December 31, 2019 included U.S. government agency debt securities, debt securities issued by foreign agencies and backed by foreign governments and investments in corporate debt securities that are trading in the credit markets; and

 

Level 3–these valuations are based on an income approach using certain inputs that are unobservable and are significant to the overall fair value measurement. Valuations of these products require a significant degree of judgment. At December 31, 2019, assets utilizing Level 3 inputs included contingent consideration and an investment in a corporate debt security.

The carrying amounts reflected in the consolidated balance sheets for cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, other current assets, accounts payable and accrued expenses approximate fair value due to their short‑term nature.

Inventory

Inventory

Inventory is stated at the lower of cost and net realizable value. Cost is determined using the first-in, first-out method. Included in inventory are raw materials used in production of pre-clinical and clinical products, which have alternative future use and are charged to R&D expense when consumed. The cost elements included within inventory include three primary categories for commercial products: cost of raw materials; direct labor; and overhead. Overhead is based on the normal capacity of the Company’s production facilities and does not include costs from abnormally low production or idle capacity, which are expensed directly to the consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive loss.

Property, Plant and Equipment

Property, Plant and Equipment

Property, plant and equipment are recorded at cost, subject to review for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the assets may not be recoverable. Expenditures for repairs and maintenance are charged to expense as incurred and major renewals and improvements are capitalized. Depreciation is calculated using the straight‑line method over the following estimated useful lives of the assets:

 

Asset group

 

Term

Buildings and improvements

 

15 - 40 years

Furniture, fixtures and equipment

 

3 - 10 years

Leasehold improvements

 

Shorter of useful life or lease term

 

Contingent Consideration

Contingent Consideration

The Company records contingent consideration it is entitled to receive at fair value on the acquisition date. The Company estimates the fair value of contingent consideration through valuation models that incorporate probability-adjusted assumptions related to the achievement of milestones and thus likelihood of receiving related payments. The Company revalues its contingent consideration each reporting period, with changes in the fair value of contingent consideration recognized within the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss. Changes in the fair value of contingent consideration can result from changes to one or multiple assumptions, including adjustments to discount rates, changes in the amount and timing of cash flows, changes in the assumed achievement and timing of any development and sales-based milestones and changes in the assumed probability associated with regulatory approval.

The period over which the Company discounts its contingent consideration is based on the current development stage of the product candidate, the specific development plan for that product candidate, adjusted for the probability of completing the development steps, and when contingent payments would be triggered. In estimating the probability of success, the Company utilizes data regarding similar milestone events from several sources, including industry studies and the Company’s own experience. These fair value measurements are based on significant inputs not observable in the market. Significant judgment was employed in determining the appropriateness of these assumptions at the acquisition date and for each subsequent period. Accordingly, changes in assumptions described above could have a material impact on the increase or decrease in the fair value of contingent consideration recorded in any given period.

Goodwill and Intangible Assets

Goodwill and Intangible Assets

Goodwill represents the excess cost of the Company’s investment in the net assets of acquired companies over the fair value of the underlying identifiable net assets at the date of acquisition. The Company’s goodwill consists solely of goodwill created as a result of the Company’s acquisition of Elan Drug Technologies (“EDT”) from Elan Corporation, plc (the “Business Combination”) in September 2011 and has been assigned to one reporting unit. A reporting unit is an operating segment or one level below an operating segment or a component to which goodwill is assigned when initially recorded.

Goodwill is not amortized but is reviewed for impairment on an annual basis, as of October 31, and whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of the goodwill might not be recoverable. The Company has the option to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is necessary to perform the quantitative impairment test. If the Company elects this option and believes, as a result of the qualitative assessment, that it is more-likely-than-not that the fair value of its reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, the quantitative impairment test is required; otherwise, no further testing is required. Alternatively, the Company may elect to not first assess qualitative factors and immediately perform the quantitative impairment test. In the quantitative impairment test, the Company compares the fair value of its reporting unit to its carrying value. If the carrying value of the net assets assigned to the reporting unit exceeds the fair value of its reporting unit, then the Company would record an impairment loss equal to the difference.

The Company’s finite-lived intangible assets, consisting of core developed technology and collaboration agreements acquired as part of the acquisition of EDT, were recorded at fair value at the time of their acquisition and are stated within the Company’s consolidated balance sheets net of accumulated amortization. The finite-lived intangible assets are amortized over their estimated useful lives using the economic use method, which reflects the pattern that the economic benefits of the intangible assets are consumed as revenue is generated from the underlying patent or contract. The useful lives of the Company’s intangible assets are primarily based on the legal or contractual life of the underlying patent or contract, which does not include additional years for the potential extension or renewal of the contract or patent.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

Impairment of Long‑Lived Assets

The Company reviews long‑lived assets to be held and used for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the assets may not be recoverable. Conditions that would necessitate an impairment assessment include a significant decline in the observable market value of an asset, a significant change in the extent or manner in which an asset is used, or a significant adverse change that would indicate that the carrying amount of an asset or group of assets is not recoverable. Determination of recoverability is based on an estimate of undiscounted future cash flows resulting from the use of the asset and its eventual disposition. In the event that such cash flows are not expected to be sufficient to recover the carrying amount of the assets, the assets are written‑down to their estimated fair values. Long‑lived assets to be disposed of are carried at fair value less costs to sell them.

Revenue from Contracts with Customers

Revenue from Contracts with Customers

Effective January 1, 2018, the Company adopted the requirements of the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (“Topic 606”) using the modified retrospective method. As part of the adoption, the Company reviewed all contracts that were not yet completed as of the date of initial application in determining the cumulative-effect impact related to the adoption of Topic 606. The cumulative-effect impact recorded to retained earnings resulted in an adjustment of approximately $0.8 million, which was primarily due to the acceleration of manufacturing revenue, offset by an adjustment to deferred revenue for license and milestone payments that will now be recognized over time. The following balance sheet accounts were impacted:

 

(In thousands)

 

Topic 606

Adjustment

 

Contract assets

 

$

9,110

 

Inventory

 

 

(8,209

)

Deferred tax asset

 

 

109

 

Contract liabilities—short-term

 

 

(1,104

)

Contract liabilities—long-term

 

 

(724

)

Accumulated deficit

 

 

818

 

 

 

$

 

 

When entering into arrangements with customers, the Company identifies whether its performance obligations under the arrangement represent a distinct good or service or a series of distinct goods or services. If a contract contains more than one performance obligation, the Company allocates the total transaction price to each performance obligation in an amount based on the estimated relative standalone selling prices of the promised goods or services underlying each performance obligation. The fair value of performance obligations under the arrangement may be derived using an estimate of selling price if the Company does not sell the goods or services separately.

 

The Company recognizes revenue when or as it satisfies a performance obligation by transferring an asset or providing a service to a customer. Management judgment is required in determining the consideration to be earned under an arrangement and the period over which the Company is expected to complete its performance obligations under an arrangement. Steering committee services that are not inconsequential or perfunctory and that are determined to be performance obligations are combined with other research services or performance obligations required under an arrangement, if any, in determining the level of effort required in an arrangement and the period over which the Company expects to complete its aggregate performance obligations.

 

Because the Company adopted Topic 606 using the modified retrospective method, the Company recognized the cumulative effect of initially applying Topic 606 as an adjustment to the opening balance of shareholders’ equity at January 1, 2018. Therefore, the comparative information at December 31, 2017 has not been adjusted and continues to be reported under the old revenue recognition guidance (“Topic 605”).

Product Sales, Net

The Company’s product sales, net consist of sales of VIVITROL®, ARISTADA® and ARISTADA INITIO® in the U.S. primarily to wholesalers, specialty distributors and pharmacies. Product sales, net are recognized when the customer obtains control of the product, which is when the product has been received by the customer.

Revenues from product sales are recorded net of reserves established for applicable discounts and allowances that are offered within contracts with the Company’s customers, health care providers or payers. The Company’s process for estimating reserves established for these variable consideration components does not differ materially from historical practices. The transaction price, which includes variable consideration reflecting the impact of discounts and allowances, may be subject to constraint and is included in the net sales price only to the extent that it is probable that a significant reversal of the amount of the cumulative revenues recognized will not occur in a future period. Actual amounts may ultimately differ from the Company’s estimates. If actual results vary, the Company adjusts these estimates, which could have an effect on earnings in the period of adjustment. The following are the Company’s significant categories of sales discounts and allowances:

 

Medicaid Rebatesthe Company records accruals for rebates to states under the Medicaid Drug Rebate Program as a reduction of sales when the product is shipped into the distribution channel using the expected value method. The Company rebates individual states for all eligible units purchased under the Medicaid program based on a rebate per unit calculation, which is based on the Company’s average manufacturer prices. The Company estimates expected unit sales and rebates per unit under the Medicaid program and adjusts its rebate based on actual unit sales and rebates per unit. To date, actual Medicaid rebates have not differed materially from the Company’s estimates; 

 

Chargebacksdiscounts that occur when contracted indirect customers purchase directly from wholesalers and specialty distributors. Contracted customers generally purchase a product at its contracted price. The wholesaler or specialty distributor, in turn, then generally charges back to the Company the difference between the wholesale acquisition cost and the contracted price paid to the wholesaler or specialty distributor by the customer. The allowance for chargebacks is made using the expected value method and is based on actual and expected utilization of these programs. Chargebacks could exceed historical experience and the Company’s estimates of future participation in these programs. To date, actual chargebacks have not differed materially from the Company’s estimates;

 

Product Discountscash consideration, including sales incentives, given by the Company under agreements with a number of wholesaler, distributor, pharmacy, and treatment provider customers that provide them with a discount on the purchase price of products. The reserve is made using the expected value method and to date, actual product discounts have not differed materially from the Company’s estimates;

 

Product Returns—the Company records an estimate for product returns at the time our customers take control of their product. The Company estimates this liability using the expected value based on historical return levels and specifically identified anticipated returns due to known business conditions and product expiry dates. Return amounts are recorded as a deduction to arrive at product sales, net. Once product is returned, it is destroyed; and

 

Medicare Part Dthe Company records accruals for Medicare Part D liabilities under the Medicare Coverage Gap Discount Program (“CGDP”) as a reduction of sales. Under the CGDP, patients reaching the annual coverage gap threshold are eligible for reimbursement coverage for out-of-pocket costs for covered prescription drugs. Under an agreement with the Center for Medicare and Medicaid, manufacturers are responsible to reimburse prescription plan sponsors for the portion of out-of-pocket expenses not covered under their Medicare plans.

Collaborative Arrangements

The Company has entered into collaboration agreements with pharmaceutical companies including Janssen Pharmaceutica Inc. (“Janssen, Inc.”), Janssen Pharmaceutica International, a division of Cilag International AG (“Janssen International”), and Janssen Pharmaceutica N.V. (together with Janssen, Inc., Janssen International and their affiliates, “Janssen”) for INVEGA SUSTENNA®/XEPLION® and INVEGA TRINZA®/TREVICTA® as well as RISPERDAL CONSTA®, Acorda Therapeutics, Inc. (“Acorda”) for AMPYRA®/FAMPYRA®, and Biogen Swiss Manufacturing GmbH (together with its affiliates, “Biogen”) for VUMERITY® (diroximel fumarate, formerly known as BIIB098). Substantially all of the products developed under these arrangements are currently being marketed as approved products for which the Company receives payments for manufacturing services and/or royalties on net product sales.

Manufacturing Revenue

The Company recognizes manufacturing revenues from the sale of products it manufactures for resale by its licensees. Manufacturing revenues for the Company’s partnered products, with the exception of those from Janssen related to RISPERDAL CONSTA, are recognized over time as products move through the manufacturing process, using a standard cost-based model as a measure of progress, which represents a faithful depiction of the transfer of control of the goods. The Company recognizes manufacturing revenue from these products over time as it determined, in each instance, that it would have a right to payment for performance completed to date if its customer were to terminate the manufacturing agreement for reasons other than the Company’s non-performance and the products have no alternative use. The Company invoices its licensees upon shipment with payment terms between 30 to 90 days.

The Company is the exclusive manufacturer of RISPERDAL CONSTA for commercial sale under its manufacturing and supply agreement with Janssen. The Company determined that it is appropriate to record revenue under this agreement at the point in time when control of the product passes to Janssen, which is determined to be when the product has been fully manufactured, since Janssen does not control the product during the manufacturing process and, in the event Janssen terminates the manufacturing and supply agreement, it is uncertain whether, and at what amount, the Company would be reimbursed for performance completed to date for product not yet fully manufactured. The manufacturing process is considered fully complete once the finished goods have been approved for shipment by both the Company and Janssen.

The sales price for certain of the Company’s manufacturing revenues is based on the end-market sales price earned by its licensees. As end-market sales generally occur after the Company has recorded manufacturing revenue, the Company estimates the sales price for such products based on information supplied to it by the Company’s licensees, its historical transaction experience and other third-party data. Differences between actual manufacturing revenues and estimated manufacturing revenues are reconciled and adjusted for in the period in which they become known, which is generally within the same quarter. The difference between the Company’s actual and estimated manufacturing revenues has not been material to date.

Royalty Revenue

The Company recognizes royalty revenues related to the sale by its licensees of products that incorporate the Company’s technologies. Royalties, with the exception of those earned on sales of AMPYRA as set forth below, qualify for the sales-and-usage exemption under Topic 606 as (i) royalties are based strictly on the sales-and-usage by the licensee; and (ii) a license of intellectual property (“IP”) is the sole or predominant item to which such royalties relate. Based on this exemption, these royalties are earned in the period the products are sold by the Company's partner and the Company has a present right to payment. Royalties on AMPYRA manufactured under our license and supply agreements with Acorda are incorporated into the standard cost-based model described in the manufacturing revenues section, above, as the terms of such agreements entitle the Company to royalty revenue as the product is being manufactured, which represents a faithful depiction of the transfer of goods, and not based on the actual end-market sales of the licensee. Certain of the Company’s royalty revenues are recognized by the Company based on information supplied to the Company by its licensees and require estimates to be made. Differences between actual royalty revenues and estimated royalty revenues are reconciled and adjusted for in the period in which they become known, which is generally within the same quarter. The difference between the Company’s actual and estimated royalty revenues has not been material to date.

Research and Development Revenue

R&D revenue consists of funding that compensates the Company for formulation, pre‑clinical and clinical testing under R&D arrangements with its partners. The Company generally bills its partners under R&D arrangements using a full‑time equivalent or hourly rate, plus direct external costs, if any. Revenue is recognized as the obligations under the R&D arrangements are performed.

License Revenue

The Company recognizes revenue from the grant of distinct, right-to-use licenses of IP when control of the license is transferred to the customer, which is the point in time the customer is able to direct the use of and obtain substantially all of the benefits from the license.

Receivables, net

Receivables, net

Receivables, net, include amounts billed and currently unconditionally due from customers. The amounts due are stated at their net estimated realizable value. The Company maintains an allowance for doubtful accounts to provide for the estimated amounts of receivables that will not be collected. The allowance is based upon an assessment of customer creditworthiness, historical payment experience, the age of outstanding receivables and collateral to the extent applicable. The Company’s allowance for doubtful accounts was $0.2 million at each of December 31, 2019 and 2018.

Contract Assets

Contract Assets

Contract assets include unbilled amounts resulting from sales under certain of the Company’s manufacturing contracts where revenue is recognized over time, except for $5.0 million of consideration related to the Company’s collaboration with Biogen related to Vumerity, which the Company expects to receive in approximately three years, and is included in “Other assets” in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. The manufacturing related amounts included in the contract assets table below complete the manufacturing process in ten days to eight weeks and are classified as current assets.

Contract assets consisted of the following:

 

(In thousands)

 

Contract Assets

 

Contract assets at January 1, 2018

 

$

9,110

 

Additions

 

 

57,617

 

Transferred to receivables, net

 

 

(58,497

)

Contract assets at December 31, 2018

 

 

8,230

 

Additions

 

 

37,911

 

Transferred to receivables, net

 

 

(32,755

)

Contract assets at December 31, 2019

 

$

13,386

 

Contract Liabilities

Contract Liabilities

The Company’s contract liabilities consist of contractual obligations related to deferred revenue.

Contract liabilities consisted of the following:

 

(In thousands)

 

Contract Liabilities

 

Contract liabilities at January 1, 2018

 

$

9,442

 

Additions

 

 

6,381

 

Amounts recognized into revenue

 

 

(3,129

)

Contract liabilities at December 31, 2018

 

 

12,694

 

Additions

 

 

18,677

 

Amounts recognized into revenue

 

 

(2,537

)

Contract liabilities at December 31, 2019

 

$

28,834

 

Foreign Currency

Foreign Currency

The Company’s functional and reporting currency is the U.S. dollar. Transactions in foreign currencies are recorded at the exchange rate prevailing on the date of the transaction. The resulting monetary assets and liabilities are translated into U.S. dollars at exchange rates prevailing on the subsequent balance sheet date. Gains and losses as a result of translation adjustments are recorded within “Other (expense) income, net” in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss. During the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, the Company recorded a (loss) gain on foreign currency translation of $(0.9) million, $(2.3) million and $3.7 million, respectively.

Concentrations

Concentrations

Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk are receivables and marketable securities. Billings to large pharmaceutical companies and pharmaceutical wholesalers account for the majority of the Company’s receivables, and collateral is generally not required from these customers. To mitigate credit risk, the Company monitors the financial performance and credit worthiness of its customers. The following represents revenue and receivables from the Company’s customers exceeding 10% of the total in each category as of, and for the years ended, December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017:

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2019

 

2018

 

2017

 

Customer

 

Receivables

 

Revenue

 

Receivables

 

Revenue

 

Receivables

 

Revenue

 

Janssen

 

29

%

28

%

27

%

29

%

31

%

33

%

Biogen

 

*

 

17

%

*

 

10

%

*

 

*

 

Cardinal Health

 

12

%

*

 

*

 

13

%

*

 

*

 

AmerisourceBergen

 

10

%

*

 

*

 

*

 

*

 

*

 

Acorda

 

*

 

*

 

15

%

10

%

14

%

13

%

 

*

 

Indicates the revenues or receivables for the customer did not exceed 10% of the Company’s total in each category as of or for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, as noted.

 

The Company holds its interest‑bearing investments with major financial institutions and, in accordance with documented investment policies, the Company limits the amount of credit exposure to any one financial institution or corporate issuer. The Company’s investment objectives are, first, to assure liquidity and conservation of capital and, second, to obtain investment income.

Geographic Information

Geographic Information

Company revenues by geographic location, as determined by the location of the customer, and the location of its assets, are as follows:

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

(In thousands)

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

Revenue by region:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S.

 

$

966,929

 

 

$

884,600

 

 

$

700,090

 

Ireland

 

 

3,195

 

 

 

4,915

 

 

 

9,706

 

Rest of world

 

 

200,823

 

 

 

204,759

 

 

 

193,578

 

Assets by region:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S.

 

$

551,799

 

 

$

546,533

 

 

$

402,481

 

Ireland

 

 

407,791

 

 

 

433,837

 

 

 

403,167

 

Rest of world

 

 

2,381

 

 

 

2,882

 

 

 

3,196

 

Long-term assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S.:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other

 

$

382,029

 

 

$

312,243

 

 

$

360,641

 

Ireland:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Intangible assets

 

$

150,643

 

 

$

191,001

 

 

$

256,168

 

Goodwill

 

 

92,873

 

 

 

92,873

 

 

 

92,873

 

Other

 

 

217,887

 

 

 

245,638

 

 

 

278,701

 

Research and Development Expenses

Research and Development Expenses

For each of its R&D programs, the Company incurs both external and internal expenses. External R&D expenses include costs related to clinical and non‑clinical activities performed by contract research organizations, consulting fees, laboratory services, purchases of drug product materials and third‑party manufacturing development costs. Internal R&D expenses include employee‑related expenses, occupancy costs, depreciation and general overhead. The Company tracks external R&D expenses for each of its development programs, however, internal R&D expenses, with the exception of those expenses related to VUMERITY, are not tracked by individual program as they benefit multiple programs or the Company’s technologies in general.

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses

Selling, general and administrative (“SG&A”) expenses are primarily comprised of employee-related expenses associated with sales and marketing, finance, human resources, legal, information technology and other administrative personnel, outside marketing, advertising and legal expenses and other general and administrative costs.

Advertising costs are expensed as incurred. During the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, advertising costs totaled $31.1 million, $54.7 million and $34.4 million, respectively.

Share-Based Compensation

Share‑Based Compensation

The Company’s share‑based compensation programs grant awards in the form of stock options and restricted stock units (“RSUs”), which vest with the passage of time and/or vest based on the achievement of certain performance criteria. The Company issues new shares upon the exercise of stock option or the vesting of RSUs. Under the terms of the Company’s stock option plans (the “Plans”), certain of the Company’s employees may become eligible upon retirement for accelerated vesting of certain awards granted to them under the Plans. Since there are no effective future service requirements for such employees, the fair value of awards to such employees is expensed in full on the grant date or upon meeting the retirement eligibility criteria, whichever is later.

Time-Based Stock Options

Stock option grants to employees expire ten years from the grant date and generally vest one fourth per year over four years from the anniversary of the date of grant, provided the employee remains continuously employed with the Company, except as otherwise provided in the applicable Plan. Stock option grants to non-employee directors expire ten years from the grant date and generally vest over a one year period provided that the director continues to serve on the Company’s board of directors through the vesting date, except as otherwise provided in the applicable Plan. The estimated fair value of options is recognized over the requisite service period, which is generally the vesting period. Share‑based compensation expense is based on awards ultimately expected to vest. Forfeitures are estimated based on historical experience at the time of grant and revised in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from those estimates.

The fair value of stock option grants is based on estimates as of the date of grant using a Black‑Scholes option valuation model. The Company uses historical data as the basis for estimating option terms and forfeitures. Separate groups of employees that have similar historical stock option exercise and forfeiture behavior are considered separately for valuation purposes. The ranges of expected terms disclosed below reflect different expected behavior among certain groups of employees. Expected stock volatility factors are based on a weighted average of implied volatilities from traded options on the Company’s ordinary shares and historical share price volatility of the Company’s ordinary shares, which is determined based on a review of the weighted average of historical daily price changes of the Company’s ordinary shares. The risk‑free interest rate for periods commensurate with the expected term of the share option is based on the U.S. treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant. The dividend yield on the Company’s ordinary shares is estimated to be zero as the Company has not paid and does not expect to pay dividends. The exercise price of options granted is equal to the closing price of the Company’s ordinary shares traded on the Nasdaq Global Select Market on the date of grant.

The fair value of each stock option grant was estimated on the grant date with the following weighted‑average assumptions:

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

2019

 

2018

 

 

2017

Expected option term

 

5 - 7 years

 

5 - 8 years

 

 

5 - 8 years

Expected stock volatility

 

46 % - 50 %

 

44 % - 49 %

 

 

43 % - 47 %

Risk-free interest rate

 

1.34 % - 2.59 %

 

2.25 % - 3.10 %

 

 

1.69 % - 2.38 %

Expected annual dividend yield

 

 

 

 

 

Performance-Based Stock Options

 

Certain of the Company’s granted stock options are subject to achievement of a specified market condition prior to vesting in addition to being subject to time-based vesting. The estimated fair value of these stock options that vest upon the achievement of a market condition was determined through the use of a Monte Carlo simulation model, which utilizes input variables that determine the probability of satisfying the market condition stipulated in the award and calculates the fair market value for the award. The Monte Carlo simulation model used the following assumptions:

 

Grant Date

 

Weighted-Average

Expected Volatility

 

 

Cost of Equity

 

 

Risk-Free

Interest Rate

 

February 21, 2019

 

45.0%

 

 

12.0%

 

 

2.69%

 

 

Compensation expense for the stock options that vest upon the achievement of a market condition is recognized over a derived service period as determined by the Monte Carlo simulation model. The vesting of these stock options is also subject to continued employment of the grantee.

 

Time‑Based Restricted Stock Units

Time‑based RSUs awarded to employees generally vest one‑fourth per year over four years, commencing on the first anniversary of the date of grant, provided the employee remains continuously employed with the Company. Shares subject to these RSUs are delivered to the employee upon vesting, subject to payment of applicable withholding taxes. The fair value of time‑vested RSUs is equal to the closing price of the Company’s ordinary shares traded on the Nasdaq Global Select Market on the date of grant. Compensation expense, including the effect of forfeitures, is recognized over the applicable service period.

Performance-Based Restricted Stock Units

Performance-based RSUs awarded to employees vest upon the achievement of certain performance criteria. The estimated fair value of these RSUs is based on the closing price of the Company’s ordinary shares traded on the Nasdaq Global Select Market on the date of grant. Compensation expense for performance-based RSUs is recognized from the moment the Company determines the performance criteria probable to the date the Company deems the event is likely to occur. Cumulative adjustments are recorded quarterly to reflect subsequent changes in the estimated outcome of performance-related conditions until the date results are determined.

Income Taxes

Income Taxes

The Company recognizes income taxes under the asset and liability method. Deferred income taxes are recognized for differences between the financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities at enacted statutory tax rates in effect for the years in which the differences are expected to reverse. The effect on deferred taxes of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. In evaluating the Company’s ability to recover its deferred tax assets, the Company considers all available positive and negative evidence including its past operating results, the existence of cumulative income in the most recent fiscal years, changes in the business in which the Company operates and its forecast of future taxable income. In determining future taxable income, the Company is responsible for assumptions utilized including the amount of Irish, U.S. and other foreign pre‑tax

operating income, the reversal of temporary differences and the implementation of feasible and prudent tax planning strategies. These assumptions require significant judgment about the forecasts of future taxable income and are consistent with the plans and estimates that the Company is using to manage the underlying business.

The Company accounts for uncertain tax positions using a more‑likely‑than‑not threshold for recognizing and resolving uncertain tax positions. The evaluation of uncertain tax positions is based on factors including, but not limited to, changes in tax law, the measurement of tax positions taken or expected to be taken in tax returns, the effective settlement of matters subject to audit, new audit activity and changes in facts or circumstances related to a tax position. The Company evaluates its tax position on a quarterly basis. The Company also accrues for potential interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in income tax expense.

Comprehensive Loss

Comprehensive Loss

Comprehensive loss consists of net loss and other comprehensive loss. Other comprehensive loss includes changes in equity that are excluded from net loss, such as unrealized holding gains and losses on available‑for‑sale marketable securities.

Loss Per Share

Loss Per Share

Basic loss per share is calculated based upon net loss available to holders of ordinary shares divided by the weighted average number of ordinary shares outstanding. For the calculation of diluted earnings per share, the Company uses the weighted average number of ordinary shares outstanding, as adjusted for the effect of potential dilutive securities, including stock options and RSUs.

Segment Information

Segment Information

The Company operates as one business segment, which is the business of developing, manufacturing and commercializing medicines designed to yield better therapeutic outcomes and improve the lives of patients with serious diseases. The Company’s chief decision maker, the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, reviews the Company’s operating results on an aggregate basis and manages the Company’s operations as a single operating unit.

Employee Benefit Plans

Employee Benefit Plans

401(k) Plan

The Company maintains a 401(k) retirement savings plan (the “401(k) Plan”), which covers substantially all of its U.S.‑based employees. Eligible employees may contribute up to 100% of their eligible compensation, subject to certain Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) limitations. The Company matches 100% of employee contributions up to the first 5% of employee pay, up to IRS limits. Employee and Company contributions are fully vested when made. During the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, the Company contributed $14.8 million, $12.1 million and $9.8 million, respectively, to match employee deferrals under the 401(k) Plan.

Defined Contribution Plan

The Company maintains a defined contribution plan for its Ireland‑based employees (the “Defined Contribution Plan”). The Defined Contribution Plan provides for eligible employees to contribute up to a maximum of 40%, depending upon their age, of their total taxable earnings subject to an earnings cap of €115,000. The Company provides a match of up to 18% of taxable earnings depending upon an individual’s contribution level. During the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, the Company contributed $4.1 million, $4.0 million and $3.7 million, respectively, in contributions to the Defined Contribution Plan.

New Accounting Pronouncements

New Accounting Pronouncements

From time to time, new accounting pronouncements are issued by the FASB or other standard‑setting bodies that are adopted by the Company as of the specified effective date. Unless otherwise discussed, the Company believes that the impact of recently issued standards that are not yet effective will not have a material impact on its financial position or results of operations upon adoption.

Effective January 1, 2019, the Company adopted the requirements under Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2016-02, Leases (“Topic 842”) using the optional modified retrospective transition method and recognized a cumulative-effect adjustment to the consolidated balance sheet on the date of adoption. Comparative periods have not been restated. Topic 842 was issued in order to increase transparency and comparability among organizations by recognizing right-of-use lease assets and operating lease liabilities on the balance sheet and disclosing key information about leasing arrangements. The main difference between previous GAAP (“Topic 840”) and Topic 842 is the recognition of right-of-use lease assets and lease liabilities by lessees for those leases classified as operating leases under Topic 840. At January 1, 2019, the Company recorded a right-of-use asset of $20.1 million and an operating lease liability of $22.1 million. For additional information regarding how the Company is accounting for leases under Topic 842, refer to Note 9, Leases, in the “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements” in this Annual Report.

In April 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-09, Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting, as part of its simplification initiative that involves several aspects of the accounting for share-based payment transactions. The amendments in this

update established that: (i) all excess tax benefits and tax deficiencies be recognized as income tax expense or benefit in the income statement; (ii) excess tax benefits be classified as an operating activity in the statement of cash flows; (iii) the entity make an entity-wide accounting policy election to either estimate the number of awards that are expected to vest, which is current GAAP, or account for forfeitures as they occur; (iv) the threshold to qualify for equity classification permits withholding up to the maximum statutory tax rates in the applicable jurisdictions; and (v) cash paid by an employer when directly withholding shares for tax withholding purposes be classified as a financing activity in the statement of cash flows. This ASU became effective for the Company on January 1, 2017. The amendments related to (i), (iii) and (iv) were adopted by the Company on a modified retrospective basis, which resulted in a cumulative-effect adjustment to reduce accumulated deficit by $61.5 million related to the timing of when excess tax benefits are recognized. The Company elected to continue to record expense only for those awards that are expected to vest. The amendments related to (ii) and (v) were adopted using the prospective transition method.

In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13, Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments, to provide financial statement users with more decision-useful information about the expected credit losses on financial instruments and other commitments to extend credit held by a reporting entity at each reporting date. To achieve this objective, the amendments in this ASU replace the incurred loss impairment methodology in current GAAP with a methodology that reflects expected credit losses and requires consideration of a broader range of reasonable and supportable information to inform credit loss estimates. This ASU becomes effective for the Company in the year ending December 31, 2020. This standard primarily impacts how firms account for credit losses and requires an impairment model, known as the current expected credit loss model (“CECL”), that is based on expected losses rather than incurred losses. Companies are required to carry an allowance for expected credit losses for most debt instruments (except those carried at fair value), trade receivables, lease receivables, reinsurance receivables, financial guarantee contracts and loan commitments. Available-for-sale debt securities are scoped out of this guidance. The Company’s investment portfolio primarily consists of available-for-sale securities carried at fair value. Further, the Company’s trade receivables do not have abnormally long terms and the Company has rarely ever written off trade receivables. Accordingly, the Company has determined that the adoption of this standard will not have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements.

In June 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-07, Improvements to Nonemployee Share-Based Payment Accounting, which addresses the accounting for nonemployee share-based payment transactions resulting from expanding the scope of Topic 718, Compensation – Stock Compensation, to include share-based payment transactions for acquiring goods and services from nonemployees. This ASU became effective for and was adopted by the Company in the year ending December 31, 2019 and the adoption of this ASU did not have an impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-13, Disclosure Framework – Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurement, which aims to improve the effectiveness of fair value measurement disclosures. The amendments in this ASU modify the disclosure requirements on fair value measurements based on the concepts in FASB Concepts Statement, Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting - Chapter 8: Notes to Financial Statements, including the consideration of costs and benefits. This ASU becomes effective for the Company in the year ending December 31, 2020 and early adoption is permitted. Adoption of this standard only impacts the Company’s financial statement disclosures.

In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-15, Customer’s Accounting for Implementation Costs Incurred in a Cloud Computing Arrangement That Is a Service Contract, which aligns the requirements for capitalizing implementation costs incurred in a hosting arrangement that is a service contract with the requirements for capitalizing implementation costs incurred to develop or obtain internal-use software (and hosting arrangements that include an internal-use software license). This ASU also requires the entity to expense the capitalized implementation costs of a hosting arrangement that is a service contract over the term of the hosting arrangement, which includes reasonably certain renewals. This ASU becomes effective for the Company in the year ending December 31, 2020 and early adoption is permitted. The Company will adopt the standard as of January 1, 2020 using the prospective transition method, whereby it will apply the requirements to any eligible costs incurred after adoption. As such, there should be no impact to the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In November 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-18, Clarifying the Interaction Between Topic 808 and Topic 606, which clarifies when transactions between participants in a collaborative arrangement are within the scope of the FASB’s revenue standard, Topic 606. This ASU becomes effective for the Company in the year ending December 31, 2020. The Company reviewed its collaborative arrangements and determined that there are no collaborative arrangements that are considered within the scope of this standard.

In December 2019, the FASB issued ASU 2019-12, Simplifying the Accounting for Income Taxes, which simplifies the accounting for income taxes by removing certain exceptions to the general principles of ASC 740, Income Taxes. The amendments also improve consistent application of and simplify GAAP for other areas of Topic 740 by clarifying and amending existing guidance. This ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2020 and early adoption is permitted. Depending on the

amendment, adoption may be applied on a retrospective, modified retrospective or prospective basis. The Company is currently assessing the impact that this ASU will have on its consolidated financial statements.