NOTE 5: LOANS

The following table sets forth the composition of the loan portfolio at December 31, 2017 and 2016:


	December 31,
	2017						2016
(dollars in thousands)	Amount			Percent of Non-Covered Loans Held for Investment			Amount			Percent of Non-Covered Loans Held for Investment
Non-Covered Loans Held for Investment:
Mortgage Loans:
Multi-family	$	28,074,709			73.19	%	$	26,945,052			72.13	%
Commercial real estate		7,322,226			19.09			7,724,362			20.68
One-to-four family		477,228			1.24			381,081			1.02
Acquisition, development, and construction		435,825			1.14			381,194			1.02

Total mortgage loans held for investment	$	36,309,988			94.66		$	35,431,689			94.85

Other Loans:
Commercial and industrial		1,377,964			3.59			1,341,216			3.59
Lease financing, net of unearned income of $65,041 and $60,278, respectively		662,610			1.73			559,229			1.50

Total commercial and industrial loans ⁽¹⁾		2,040,574			5.32			1,900,445			5.09
Purchased credit-impaired loans		—			—			5,762			0.01
Other		8,460			0.02			18,305			0.05

Total other loans held for investment		2,049,034			5.34			1,924,512			5.15

Total non-covered loans held for investment	$	38,359,022			100.00	%	$	37,356,201			100.00	%

Net deferred loan origination costs		28,949						26,521
Allowance for losses on non-covered loans		(158,046	)					(158,290	)

Non-covered loans held for investment, net	$	38,229,925					$	37,224,432

Covered loans		—						1,698,133
Allowance for losses on covered loans		—						(23,701	)

Covered loans, net	$	—					$	1,674,432
Loans held for sale		35,258						409,152

Total loans, net	$	38,265,183					$	39,308,016

(1)

Includes specialty finance loans of $1.5 billion and $1.3 billion, and other C&I loans of $500.8 million and $632.9 million, respectively, at December 31, 2017 and 2016.

Non-Covered Loans

Non-Covered Loans Held for Investment

The majority of the loans the Company originates for investment are multi-family loans, most of which are collateralized by non-luxury apartment buildings in New York City with rent-regulated units and below-market rents. In addition, the Company originates commercial real estate (“CRE”) loans, most of which are collateralized by income-producing properties such as office buildings, retail centers, mixed-use buildings, and multi-tenanted light industrial properties that are located in New York City and on Long Island.

To a lesser extent, the Company also originates one-to-four family loans, acquisition, development, and construction (“ADC”) loans, and C&I loans, for investment. One-to-four family loans held for investment were originated through the Company’s mortgage banking operation and primarily consisted of jumbo prime adjustable rate mortgages made to borrowers with a solid credit history.

ADC loans are primarily originated for multi-family and residential tract projects in New York City and on Long Island. C&I loans consist of asset-based loans, equipment loans and leases, and dealer floor-plan loans (together, “specialty finance loans and leases”) that generally are made to large corporate obligors, many of which are publicly traded, carry investment grade or near-investment grade ratings, and participate in stable industries nationwide; and “other” C&I loans that primarily are made to small and mid-size businesses in Metro New York. “Other” C&I loans are typically made for working capital, business expansion, and the purchase of machinery and equipment.

The repayment of multi-family and CRE loans generally depends on the income produced by the underlying properties which, in turn, depends on their successful operation and management. To mitigate the potential for credit losses, the Company underwrites its loans in accordance with credit standards it considers to be prudent, looking first at the consistency of the cash flows being produced by the underlying property. In addition, multi-family buildings, CRE properties, and ADC projects are inspected as a prerequisite to approval, and independent appraisers, whose appraisals are carefully reviewed by the Company’s in-house appraisers, perform appraisals on the collateral properties. In many cases, a second independent appraisal review is performed.

To further manage its credit risk, the Company’s lending policies limit the amount of credit granted to any one borrower and typically require conservative debt service coverage ratios and loan-to-value ratios. Nonetheless, the ability of the Company’s borrowers to repay these loans may be impacted by adverse conditions in the local real estate market and the local economy. Accordingly, there can be no assurance that its underwriting policies will protect the Company from credit-related losses or delinquencies.

ADC loans typically involve a higher degree of credit risk than loans secured by improved or owner-occupied real estate. Accordingly, borrowers are required to provide a guarantee of repayment and completion, and loan proceeds are disbursed as construction progresses, as certified by in-house inspectors or third-party engineers. The Company seeks to minimize the credit risk on ADC loans by maintaining conservative lending policies and rigorous underwriting standards. However, if the estimate of value proves to be inaccurate, the cost of completion is greater than expected, or the length of time to complete and/or sell or lease the collateral property is greater than anticipated, the property could have a value upon completion that is insufficient to assure full repayment of the loan. This could have a material adverse effect on the quality of the ADC loan portfolio, and could result in losses or delinquencies. In addition, the Company utilizes the same stringent appraisal process for ADC loans as it does for its multi-family and CRE loans.

To minimize the risk involved in specialty finance lending and leasing, the Company participates in syndicated loans that are brought to it, and equipment loans and leases that are assigned to it, by a select group of nationally recognized sources who have had long-term relationships with its experienced lending officers. Each of these credits is secured with a perfected first security interest or outright ownership in the underlying collateral, and structured as senior debt or as a non-cancelable lease. To further minimize the risk involved in specialty finance lending and leasing, each transaction is re-underwritten. In addition, outside counsel is retained to conduct a further review of the underlying documentation.

To minimize the risks involved in other C&I lending, the Company underwrites such loans on the basis of the cash flows produced by the business; requires that such loans be collateralized by various business assets, including inventory, equipment, and accounts receivable, among others; and typically requires personal guarantees. However, the capacity of a borrower to repay such a C&I loan is substantially dependent on the degree to which the business is successful. In addition, the collateral underlying such loans may depreciate over time, may not be conducive to appraisal, or may fluctuate in value, based upon the results of operations of the business.

Included in non-covered loans held for investment at December 31, 2017, were loans of $59.5 million to officers, directors, and their related interests and parties. There were no loans to principal shareholders at that date.

At December 31, 2016, the Company had non-covered purchased credit-impaired (“PCI”) loans, with a carrying value of $5.8 million and an unpaid principal balance of $7.0 million at that date. PCI loans had been covered under the LSA with the FDIC that expired in March 2015 and had been included in non-covered loans. Such loans were accounted for under ASC 310-30 and were initially measured at fair value, which included estimated future credit losses expected to be incurred over the lives of the loans. Under ASC 310-30, purchasers are permitted to aggregate acquired loans into one or more pools, provided that the loans have common risk characteristics. A pool is then accounted for as a single asset with a single composite interest rate and an aggregate expectation of cash flows. There were no such loans accounted for under ASC 310-30 at December 31, 2017.

Loans Held for Sale

At December 31, 2017 the Company had loans held for sale of $35.3 million as compared to $409.2 million at December 31, 2016. The decline reflects the sale of its mortgage banking business, which was acquired as part of its 2009 FDIC-assisted acquisition of AmTrust and was reported under the Company’s Residential Mortgage Banking segment, to Freedom. Accordingly, on September 29, 2017, the sale was completed with proceeds received in the amount of $226.6 million, resulting in a gain of $7.4 million, which is included in “Non-Interest Income” in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss). Freedom acquired both the Company’s origination and servicing platforms, as well as its mortgage servicing loan portfolio of $20.5 billion and related MSR asset of $208.8 million.

The Community Bank’s mortgage banking operations originated, aggregated, sold, and serviced one-to-four family loans. Community banks, credit unions, mortgage companies, and mortgage brokers used its proprietary web-accessible mortgage banking platform to originate and close one-to-four family loans nationwide. These loans were generally sold to GSEs, servicing retained. To a much lesser extent, the Community Bank used its mortgage banking platform to originate jumbo loans.

Asset Quality

The following table presents information regarding the quality of the Company’s non-covered loans held for investment at December 31, 2017:


(in thousands)	Loans 30-89 Days Past Due⁽¹⁾		Non- Accrual Loans ⁽¹⁾		Loans 90 Days or More Delinquent and Still Accruing Interest		Total Past Due Loans		Current Loans		Total Loans Receivable
Multi-family	$	1,258	$	11,078	$	—	$	12,336	$	28,062,373	$	28,074,709
Commercial real estate		13,227		6,659		—		19,886		7,302,340		7,322,226
One-to-four family		585		1,966		—		2,551		474,677		477,228
Acquisition, development, and construction		—		6,200		—		6,200		429,625		435,825
Commercial and industrial⁽¹⁾⁽²⁾		2,711		47,768		—		50,479		1,990,095		2,040,574
Other		8		11		—		19		8,441		8,460

Total	$	17,789	$	73,682	$	—	$	91,471	$	38,267,551	$	38,359,022

(1)

Includes $2.7 million and $46.7 million of taxi medallion-related loans that were 30 to 89 days past due and 90 days or more past due, respectively.

(2)

Includes lease financing receivables, all of which were current.

The following table presents information regarding the quality of the Company’s non-covered loans held for investment (excluding non-covered PCI loans) at December 31, 2016:


(in thousands)	Loans 30-89 Days Past Due⁽¹⁾		Non-Accrual Loans ⁽¹⁾		Loans 90 Days or More Delinquent and Still Accruing Interest		Total Past Due Loans		Current Loans		Total Loans Receivable
Multi-family	$	28	$	13,558	$	—	$	13,586	$	26,931,466	$	26,945,052
Commercial real estate		—		9,297		—		9,297		7,715,065		7,724,362
One-to-four family		2,844		9,679		—		12,523		368,558		381,081
Acquisition, development, and construction		—		6,200		—		6,200		374,994		381,194
Commercial and industrial⁽¹⁾⁽²⁾		7,263		16,422		—		23,685		1,876,760		1,900,445
Other ⁽³⁾		248		1,313		—		1,561		16,744		18,305

Total	$	10,383	$	56,469	$	—	$	66,852	$	37,283,587	$	37,350,439

(1)

Excludes $6 thousand and $869 thousand of non-covered PCI loans that were 30 to 89 days past due and 90 days or more past due, respectively.

(2)

Includes lease financing receivables, all of which were current.

(3)

Includes $6.8 million and $15.2 million of taxi medallion loans that were 30 to 89 days past due and 90 days or more past due, respectively.

The following table summarizes the Company’s portfolio of non-covered loans held for investment by credit quality indicator at December 31, 2017:


	Mortgage Loans										Other Loans
(in thousands)	Multi-Family		Commercial Real Estate		One-to-Four Family		Acquisition, Development, and Construction		Total Mortgage Loans		Commercial and Industrial⁽¹⁾		Other		Total Other Loans
Credit Quality Indicator:
Pass	$	27,874,330	$	7,255,100	$	471,571	$	344,040	$	35,945,041	$	1,925,527	$	8,449	$	1,933,976
Special mention		125,752		47,123		3,691		76,033		252,599		20,883		—		20,883
Substandard		74,627		20,003		1,966		15,752		112,348		94,164		11		94,175
Doubtful		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—

Total	$	28,074,709	$	7,322,226	$	477,228	$	435,825	$	36,309,988	$	2,040,574	$	8,460	$	2,049,034

(1)

Includes lease financing receivables, all of which were classified as “pass.”

The following table summarizes the Company’s portfolio of non-covered loans held for investment (excluding non-covered PCI loans) by credit quality indicator at December 31, 2016:


	Mortgage Loans										Other Loans
(in thousands)	Multi-Family		Commercial Real Estate		One-to-Four Family		Acquisition, Development, and Construction		Total Mortgage Loans		Commercial and Industrial⁽¹⁾		Other		Total Other Loans
Credit Quality Indicator:
Pass	$	26,754,622	$	7,701,773	$	371,179	$	341,784	$	35,169,358	$	1,771,975	$	16,992	$	1,788,967
Special mention		164,325		12,604		—		33,210		210,139		54,979		—		54,979
Substandard		26,105		9,985		9,902		6,200		52,192		73,491		1,313		74,804
Doubtful		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—

Total	$	26,945,052	$	7,724,362	$	381,081	$	381,194	$	35,431,689	$	1,900,445	$	18,305	$	1,918,750

(1)

Includes lease financing receivables, all of which were classified as “pass.”

The preceding classifications are the most current ones available and generally have been updated within the last twelve months. In addition, they follow regulatory guidelines and can generally be described as follows: pass loans are of satisfactory quality; special mention loans have potential weaknesses that deserve management’s close attention; substandard loans are inadequately protected by the current net worth and paying capacity of the borrower or of the collateral pledged (these loans have a well-defined weakness and there is a possibility that the Company will sustain some loss); and doubtful loans, based on existing circumstances, have weaknesses that make collection or liquidation in full highly questionable and improbable. In addition, one-to-four family loans are classified based on the duration of the delinquency.

The interest income that would have been recorded under the original terms of non-accrual loans at the respective year-ends, and the interest income actually recorded on these loans in the respective years, is summarized below:


	December 31,
(in thousands)	2017			2016			2015
Interest income that would have been recorded	$	4,974		$	3,128		$	2,288
Interest income actually recorded		(2,904	)		(1,708	)		(1,574	)

Interest income foregone	$	2,070		$	1,420		$	714

Troubled Debt Restructurings

The Company is required to account for certain held-for-investment loan modifications and restructurings as TDRs. In general, a modification or restructuring of a loan constitutes a TDR if the Company grants a concession to a borrower experiencing financial difficulty. A loan modified as a TDR generally is placed on non-accrual status until the Company determines that future collection of principal and interest is reasonably assured, which requires, among other things, that the borrower demonstrate performance according to the restructured terms for a period of at least six consecutive months.

In an effort to proactively manage delinquent loans, the Company has selectively extended to certain borrowers concessions such as rate reductions, extension of maturity dates, and forbearance agreements. As of December 31, 2017, loans on which concessions were made with respect to rate reductions and/or extension of maturity dates amounted to $44.6 million; loans on which forbearance agreements were reached amounted to $1.0 million.

The following table presents information regarding the Company’s TDRs as of December 31, 2017 and 2016:


	December 31,
	2017						2016
(in thousands)	Accruing		Non- Accrual		Total		Accruing		Non- Accrual		Total
Loan Category:
Multi-family	$	824	$	8,061	$	8,885	$	1,981	$	8,755	$	10,736
Commercial real estate		—		368		368		—		1,861		1,861
One-to-four family		—		1,066		1,066		222		1,749		1,971
Acquisition, development, and construction		8,652		—		8,652		—		—		—
Commercial and industrial		177		26,408		26,585		1,263		3,887		5,150
Other		—		—		—		—		202		202

Total	$	9,653	$	35,903	$	45,556	$	3,466	$	16,454	$	19,920

The eligibility of a borrower for work-out concessions of any nature depends upon the facts and circumstances of each loan, which may change from period to period, and involves judgment by Company personnel regarding the likelihood that the concession will result in the maximum recovery for the Company.

The financial effects of the Company’s TDRs for the twelve months ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015 are summarized as follows:


	For the Twelve Months Ended December 31, 2017
							Weighted Average Interest Rate
(dollars in thousands)	Number of Loans		Pre-Modification Recorded Investment		Post-Modification Recorded Investment		Pre- Modification			Post- Modification			Charge-off Amount		Capitalized Interest
Loan Category:
One-to-four family		4	$	810	$	986		5.93	%		2.21	%	$	—	$	12
Acquisition, development, and construction		2		8,652		8,652		5.50			5.50			—		—
Commercial and industrial		65		52,179		26,409		3.36			3.26			14,273		—

Total		71	$	61,641	$	36,047							$	14,273	$	12


	For the Twelve Months Ended December 31, 2016
							Weighted Average Interest Rate
(dollars in thousands)	Number of Loans		Pre-Modification Recorded Investment		Post-Modification Recorded Investment		Pre- Modification			Post- Modification			Charge-off Amount		Capitalized Interest
Loan Category:
Multi-family		1	$	9,340	$	8,129		4.63	%		4.00	%	$	—	$	—
One-to-four family		5		900		1,036		4.26			2.65			—		11
Commercial and industrial		7		4,697		3,935		3.22			3.19			170		—

Total		13	$	14,937	$	13,100							$	170	$	11


	For the Twelve Months Ended December 31, 2015
							Weighted Average Interest Rate
(dollars in thousands)	Number of Loans		Pre-Modification Recorded Investment		Post-Modification Recorded Investment		Pre- Modification			Post- Modification			Charge-off Amount		Capitalized Interest
Loan Category:
One-to-four family		4	$	568	$	619		4.02	%		2.72	%	$	—	$	6
Commercial and industrial		2		1,345		1,312		3.40			3.52			33		—
Other		2		193		213		4.58			2.00			—		2

Total		8	$	2,106	$	2,144							$	33	$	8

At December 31, 2017, seven C&I loans, in the amount of $1.6 million that had been modified as a TDR during the twelve months ended at that date was in payment default. At December 31, 2016, none of the loans that had been modified as a TDR during the twelve months ended at that date were in payment default. At December 31, 2015, one home equity loan in the amount of $143,000 that had been modified as a TDR during the twelve months ended at that date was in payment default. A loan is considered to be in payment default once it is 30 days contractually past due under the modified terms.

The Company does not consider a payment to be in default when the loan is in forbearance, or otherwise granted a delay of payment, when the agreement to forebear or allow a delay of payment is part of a modification.

Subsequent to the modification, the loan is not considered to be in default until payment is contractually past due in accordance with the modified terms. However, the Company does consider a loan with multiple modifications or forbearance periods to be in default, and would also consider a loan to be in default if the borrower were in bankruptcy or if the loan were partially charged off subsequent to modification.

Covered Loans

The Company sold its covered loan portfolio during the third quarter of 2017; therefore, the Company did not have any covered loans outstanding as of December 31, 2017.

The Company referred to certain loans acquired in the AmTrust and Desert Hills transactions as “covered loans” because the Company was being reimbursed for a substantial portion of losses on these loans under the terms of the LSA. Covered loans were accounted for under ASC 310-30 and were initially measured at fair value, which included estimated future credit losses expected to be incurred over the lives of the loans. Under ASC 310-30, purchasers are permitted to aggregate acquired loans into one or more pools, provided that the loans have common risk characteristics. A pool is then accounted for as a single asset with a single composite interest rate and an aggregate expectation of cash flows.

The following table presents the carrying value of covered loans which were acquired in the acquisitions of AmTrust and Desert Hills as of December 31, 2016.


(dollars in thousands)	Amount		Percent of Covered Loans
Loan Category:
One-to-four family	$	1,609,635		94.8	%
Other loans		88,498		5.2

Total covered loans	$	1,698,133		100.0	%

At December 31, 2016, the unpaid principal balance of covered loans was $2.1 billion and the carrying value of such loans was $1.7 billion.

At December 31, 2016, the Company estimated the fair values of the AmTrust and Desert Hills loan portfolios, which represented the expected cash flows from the portfolios, discounted at market-based rates. In estimating such fair values, the Company: (a) calculated the contractual amount and timing of undiscounted principal and interest payments (the “undiscounted contractual cash flows”); and (b) estimated the expected amount and timing of undiscounted principal and interest payments (the “undiscounted expected cash flows”). The amount by which the undiscounted expected cash flows exceed the estimated fair value (the “accretable yield”) was accreted into interest income over the lives of the loans. The amount by which the undiscounted contractual cash flows exceed the undiscounted expected cash flows is referred to as the “non-accretable difference.” The non-accretable difference represented an estimate of the credit risk in the loan portfolios at the respective acquisition dates.

The accretable yield was affected by changes in interest rate indices for variable rate loans, changes in prepayment assumptions, and changes in expected principal and interest payments over the estimated lives of the loans. Changes in interest rate indices for variable rate loans increased or decreased the amount of interest income expected to be collected, depending on the direction of interest rates. Prepayments affected the estimated lives of covered loans and could have changed the amount of interest income and principal expected to be collected. Changes in expected principal and interest payments over the estimated lives of covered loans were driven by the credit outlook and by actions that may be taken with borrowers. As of the date of the sale, the accretable yield was reduced to zero.

On a quarterly basis, the Company had evaluated the estimates of the cash flows it expected to collect. Expected future cash flows from interest payments were based on variable rates at the time of the quarterly evaluation. Estimates of expected cash flows that were impacted by changes in interest rate indices for variable rate loans and prepayment assumptions were treated as prospective yield adjustments and included in interest income. In the twelve months ended December 31, 2017, changes in the accretable yield for covered loans were as follows:


(in thousands)	Accretable Yield
Balance at beginning of period	$	647,470
Accretion		(72,842	)
Reclassification to non-accretable difference for the six months ended June 30, 2017		(11,381	)
Changes in expected cash flows due to the sale of the covered loan portfolio		(563,247	)

Balance at end of period	$	—

In the preceding table, the line item “Reclassification to non-accretable difference for the six months ended June 30, 2017” includes changes in cash flows that the Company expects to collect due to changes in prepayment assumptions, changes in interest rates on variable rate loans, and changes in loss assumptions. As of the Company’s most recent quarterly evaluation, prepayment assumptions increased, which resulted in a decrease in future expected interest cash flows and, consequently, a decrease in the accretable yield. The effect of this decrease was partially offset with an improvement in the underlying credit assumptions and the resetting of rates on variable rate loans at a slightly higher level, which resulted in an increase in future expected interest cash flows and, consequently, an increase in the accretable yield.

Reflecting the foreclosure of certain loans acquired in the AmTrust and Desert Hills acquisitions, the Company owned certain OREO that was covered under its LSA (“covered OREO”). Covered OREO was initially recorded at its estimated fair value on the respective dates of acquisition, based on independent appraisals, less the estimated selling costs. Any subsequent write-downs due to declines in fair value were charged to non-interest expense, and were partially offset by loss reimbursements under the LSA. Any recoveries of previous write-downs have been credited to non-interest expense and partially offset by the portion of the recovery that was due to the FDIC. The Company’s covered OREO was sold during the third quarter of 2017.

The FDIC loss share receivable represented the present value of the estimated losses to be reimbursed by the FDIC. The estimated losses were based on the same cash flow estimates used in determining the fair value of the covered loans. The FDIC loss share receivable was reduced as losses on covered loans were recognized and as loss sharing payments were received from the FDIC. Realized losses in excess of acquisition-date estimates resulted in an increase in the FDIC loss share receivable. Conversely, if realized losses were lower than the acquisition-date estimates, the FDIC loss share receivable was reduced by amortization to interest income. Effective October 31, 2017, the Company and the FDIC completed termination of the LSA.

At December 31, 2017, the Company had no residential mortgage loans in the process of foreclosure. At December 31, 2016, the Company held residential mortgage loans of $78.6 million that were in the process of foreclosure. The vast majority of such loans were covered loans.

The following table presents information regarding the Company’s covered loans at December 31, 2016 that were 90 days or more past due:


(in thousands)
Covered Loans 90 Days or More Past Due:
One-to-four family	$	124,820
Other loans		6,645

Total covered loans 90 days or more past due	$	131,465

The following table presents information regarding the Company’s covered loans at December 31, 2016 that were 30 to 89 days past due:


(in thousands)
Covered Loans 30-89 Days Past Due:
One-to-four family	$	21,112
Other loans		1,536

Total covered loans 30-89 days past due	$	22,648

At December 31, 2016, the Company had $22.6 million of covered loans that were 30 to 89 days past due, and covered loans of $131.5 million that were 90 days or more past due but considered to be performing due to the application of the yield accretion method under ASC 310-30. The remainder of the Company’s covered loan portfolio totaled $1.5 billion at December 31, 2016 and were considered current at that date.

Loans that may have been classified as non-performing loans by AmTrust or Desert Hills were no longer classified as non-performing by the Company because, at the respective dates of acquisition, the Company believed that it would fully collect the new carrying value of these loans. The new carrying value represented the contractual balance, reduced by the portion that was expected to be uncollectible (i.e., the non-accretable difference) and by an accretable yield (discount) that was recognized as interest income. It is important to note that management’s judgment was required in reclassifying loans subject to ASC 310-30 as performing loans, and such judgment was dependent on having a reasonable expectation about the timing and amount of the cash flows to be collected, even if the loan was contractually past due.

The primary credit quality indicator for covered loans is the expectation of underlying cash flows. In the twelve months ended December 31, 2016, the Company recorded recoveries of losses on covered loans of $23.7 million. The recoveries were largely due to an increase in expected cash flows in the acquired portfolios of one-to-fourfamily and home equity loans, and were partly offset by FDIC indemnification expense of $19.0 million that was recorded in “Non-interest income.”