XML 57 R12.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT
v2.4.0.6

Adoption of Accounting Pronouncements | 6 Months Ended
--- | ---
Jun. 30, 2012
New Accounting Pronouncements and Changes in Accounting Principles [Abstract] |
Adoption Of Accounting Pronouncements | Adoption of Accounting Pronouncements In October 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-26, Financial Services-Insurance (Topic 944): Accounting for Costs Associated with Acquiring or Renewing Insurance Contracts (“ASU 2010-26”). ASU 2010-26 requires that only costs that are incremental or directly related to the successful acquisition of new or renewal insurance contracts are to be capitalized as a deferred acquisition cost. This includes, among other items, sales commissions paid to agents, premium taxes, and the portion of employee salaries and benefits directly related to time spent on acquired contracts. We adopted this guidance on January 1, 2012, with retrospective application and, as such, all historical data in this Form 10-Q has been restated to reflect the revised guidance. The following tables provide select restated financial information:
Balance Sheet Information December 31, 2011 |  |  |  |  |  |
($ in thousands) |  | As Originally Reported |  | Effect of Change |  | As Adopted
Deferred policy acquisition costs |  | $ | 214,069 |  |  | (78,308 | ) |  | 135,761 |
Deferred federal income tax recoverable |  | 92,686 |  |  | 27,408 |  |  | 120,094 |
Retained earnings |  | 1,167,219 |  |  | (50,900 | ) |  | 1,116,319 |
Income Statement Information Quarter ended June 30, 2011 |  |  |  |  |  |
($ in thousands, except per share amounts) |  | As Originally Reported |  | Effect of Change |  | As Adopted
Policy acquisition costs |  | $ | 113,843 |  |  | 1,320 |  |  | 115,163 |
Deferred federal income tax expense |  | (4,215 | ) |  | (462 | ) |  | (4,677 | )
Net income |  | 2,325 |  |  | (858 | ) |  | 1,467 |
Net income per share: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Basic |  | $ | 0.04 |  |  | (0.01 | ) |  | 0.03 |
Diluted |  | 0.04 |  |  | (0.01 | ) |  | 0.03 |
Income Statement Information Six months ended June 30, 2011 |  |  |  |  |  |
($ in thousands, except per share amounts) |  | As Originally Reported |  | Effect of Change |  | As Adopted
Policy acquisition costs |  | $ | 227,273 |  |  | 2,934 |  |  | 230,207 |
Deferred federal income tax expense |  | (2,268 | ) |  | (1,027 | ) |  | (3,295 | )
Net income |  | $ | 23,874 |  |  | (1,907 | ) |  | 21,967 |
Net income per share: |  |  |  |  |  |
Basic |  | $ | 0.44 |  |  | (0.03 | ) |  | 0.41 |
Diluted |  | 0.43 |  |  | (0.03 | ) |  | 0.40 |
Cash Flow Information Six months ended June 30, 2011 |  |  |  |  |  |
($ in thousands, except per share amounts) |  | As Originally Reported |  | Effect of Change |  | As Adopted
(Increase) decrease in deferred policy acquisition costs |  | $ | (6,558 | ) |  | 2,934 |  |  | (3,624 | )
Decrease in net federal income taxes recoverable |  | 1,628 |  |  | (1,027 | ) |  | 601 |
In May 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-04, Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRSs (“ASU 2011-04”). This guidance changes the wording used to describe the requirements in U.S. GAAP for measuring fair value and disclosing information about fair value measurements to improve consistency in the application and description of fair value between GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards. ASU 2011-04 clarifies that the concepts of highest and best use and valuation premise in a fair value measurement are relevant only when measuring the fair value of nonfinancial assets, and are not relevant when measuring the fair value of financial assets or liabilities. In addition, ASU 2011-04 expands the disclosures for unobservable inputs for Level 3 fair value measurements, requiring quantitative and qualitative information to be disclosed related to: (i) the valuation processes used; (ii) the sensitivity of the fair value measurement to changes in unobservable inputs and the interrelationships between those unobservable inputs; and (iii) the use of a nonfinancial asset in a way that differs from the asset’s highest and best use. ASU 2011-04 was effective prospectively for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011. We have included the disclosures required by this guidance in our notes to the Financial Statements, where appropriate. In June 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-05, Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Presentation of Comprehensive Income (“ASU 2011-05”). ASU 2011-05 requires that all non-owner changes in stockholders’ equity be presented either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. The standard eliminates the option to report other comprehensive income and its components in the statement of stockholders’ equity. Based on an amendment issued in December 2011, companies are not required to present separate line items on the income statement for reclassification adjustments out of accumulated other comprehensive income into net income, as would have been required under the initial ASU. This guidance, which is ASU 2011-12, Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Deferral of the Effective Date for Amendments to the Presentation of Reclassifications of Items Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income in Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-05, is effective concurrently with ASU 2011-05. We have retroactively restated our financial statements in this Form 10-Q to comply with the presentation required under this accounting guidance. In September 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-08, Intangibles-Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Testing Goodwill for Impairment, which simplifies the requirements to test goodwill for impairment. This guidance permits an entity to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount. If, after assessing events and circumstances, an entity determines that it is not more likely than not that the fair value of the reporting unit is less than the carrying amount, then performing the two-step impairment test is unnecessary. However, if the entity concludes otherwise, then it is required to perform the quantitative impairment test. This guidance was effective for annual and interim goodwill impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2011, and early adoption was permitted. The adoption of this guidance did not impact our financial condition or results of operation.

X
- Definition This note describes accounting pronouncements and their impact on the entity that were recently adopted or are pending adoption. + References No definition available. + Details
Name: | sigi_AdoptionOfAccountingPronouncementsTextBlock
Namespace Prefix: | sigi_
Data Type: | nonnum:textBlockItemType
Balance Type: | na
Period Type: | duration

X
- Details
Name: | us-gaap_NewAccountingPronouncementsAndChangesInAccountingPrinciplesAbstract
Namespace Prefix: | us-gaap_
Data Type: | xbrli:stringItemType
Balance Type: | na
Period Type: | duration