XML 49 R23.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT
v3.7.0.1

Legal and Regulatory Matters | 6 Months Ended
--- | ---
Jun. 30, 2017
Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract] |
Legal and Regulatory Matters | Legal and Regulatory Matters Laureate is subject to legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business. In management's opinion, we have adequate legal defenses, insurance coverage, and/or accrued liabilities with respect to the eventuality of these actions. Management believes that any settlement would not have a material impact on Laureate's financial position, results of operations, or cash flows. For further description, see our 2016 Form 10-K. Discussed below are those matters that had material developments during the six months ended June 30, 2017. Turkish Regulation - Bilgi Annual Audit The Company previously disclosed in its 2016 Form 10-K that the Turkish Higher Education Council (the YÖK), which regulates Istanbul Bilgi University (Bilgi), a member of the Laureate International Universities network located in Istanbul, Turkey, was conducting its annual audit of Bilgi’s operations (the Annual Audit). On April 18, 2017, Bilgi received from the YÖK the results of the Annual Audit. The Annual Audit report requires, among other things, that (i) with respect to the 2017-2018 academic year, there be a reduction in the quota for the number of new students permitted to be admitted into Bilgi’s degree programs and (ii) Bilgi be reimbursed approximately $29,000 for payments previously made by Bilgi to a subsidiary of the Company for certain management, operational and student services, and intellectual property. The Company and Bilgi believe the charges to Bilgi for these services were at fair value and Bilgi intends to contest the findings of the Annual Audit that they constituted an improper wealth transfer. Demands also are made in the Annual Audit for the return or payment to Bilgi of other amounts involving approximately $8,000. The Company believes that Bilgi is in compliance with all laws and regulations. Bilgi exercised its right to appeal this decision to the YÖK to demonstrate the validity and value of the services procured from the Company subsidiary. Under the YÖK’s rules, the YÖK was required to rule on Bilgi’s appeal not later than August 8, 2017. If the YÖK did not rule by that date, the appeal would be deemed to have been rejected. As of the close of business in Turkey on August 8, 2017, Bilgi had not been informed of any ruling by the YÖK. Bilgi intends to appeal the YÖK’s rejection of its appeal to the Turkish court system and it has been advised that the YÖK will not take any action against it relating to payments made to the Company’s subsidiary for the services described above during the pendency of this appeal. As the Company currently consolidates Bilgi under the variable interest entity model, if the Company is unable to provide services under its contracts with Bilgi and receive the economic benefits from those contracts as a result of the determinations in the Annual Audit, deconsolidation of Bilgi could be required. Deconsolidation, if required, could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations, including possible write-off of all or a portion of the Company’s investment in Bilgi and a reduction in operating income. At June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, Bilgi had total assets of approximately $84,000 and $83,000, respectively, and total liabilities of $54,000 and $63,000, respectively. Total liabilities include approximately $28,000 and $19,000 of net intercompany liabilities as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively. During fiscal year 2016, Bilgi generated approximately $106,000 of the Company’s consolidated revenue and approximately $26,000 of the Company’s consolidated operating income and incurred approximately $6,000 of depreciation and amortization expense. Chilean Regulation - Higher Education Bill On July 5, 2016, the Chilean President submitted to the Chilean Congress a bill (the “2016 Higher Education Bill”) that was intended to change the entire regulatory landscape of higher education in Chile by, among other things, creating new special government administrative agencies and enhancing the requirements for institutional accreditation of higher education institutions. Following its submission to the Chilean Congress, the 2016 Higher Education Bill was subject to national debate among different constituencies in the higher education system. As a result of these discussions, the Chilean executive branch decided to replace the 2016 Higher Education Bill with a new submission that would take into consideration the main concerns that were raised during those discussions. These discussions identified, among other things, (i) the need to reinforce, improve and enhance the state-owned universities, separating their regulation from the regulation applicable to other educational institutions, (ii) the need to develop special regulations for technical education, (iii) the need to improve regulations concerning the compliance by private universities with the requirement that they not be operated for profit, and (iv) the need to grant universal access to educational institutions. In furtherance of these goals, on April 7, 2017, the Chilean executive branch submitted to the Chilean Congress a new bill (the “2017 Higher Education Bill”), which entirely supersedes the 2016 Higher Education Bill. The 2017 Higher Education Bill represents a simplified version of the 2016 Higher Education Bill and was based on the same principles and ideas as the earlier bill, as informed by the subsequent national debate on that bill. The 2017 Higher Education Bill considers the higher education system to be a mixed system composed of two subsystems, one for university education (including both state-owned institutions and private universities recognized by the state) and another for technical education (both state-owned technical training centers and private technical training centers and professional institutes). Among other things, the 2017 Higher Education Bill would create the Undersecretary of Higher Education, who would propose policies on higher education to the Ministry of Education and policies regarding access, inclusion, retention and graduation of higher education students. The Undersecretary of Higher Education would also propose the allocation and management of public funds and manage the procedures relating to the granting and revocation of the official recognition of higher education institutions. The Undersecretary of Higher Education would also generate and coordinate instances of participation and dialogue with and among higher education institutions, promoting the connection between these institutions and the secondary education system. The 2017 Higher Education Bill also includes new regulations applicable to not‑for‑profit educational institutions that would: (i) provide that their controllers and members can only be individuals, other not‑for‑profits or state‑owned entities; (ii) create the obligation to use their resources and reinvest their surplus or profits in the pursuit of their objectives and in enhancing the quality of the education they provide; (iii) create the obligation to have a board of directors, which cannot delegate its functions, and whose members cannot be removed unless approved by the majority of the board and for serious reasons; and (iv) prohibit related party transactions with their founders, controllers, members of the board, rector and their relatives or related entities, unless the counterparty to the transaction is another not‑for‑profit entity, or if the transaction involves entering into a labor agreement to carry out academic work for the educational institution. The bill provides further that in the event the educational institution enters into a related party transaction consistent with the above, or if such educational institution enters into a related party transaction with a different entity than those described above, such transaction also comply with the following requirements: (i) that it contribute to the best interests of the educational institution and to its mission and purpose; (ii) that the transaction be agreed under market conditions as to the price and general terms and conditions prevailing for such types of transactions; and (iii) that it be approved by a majority of the institution’s board of directors. The 2017 Higher Education Bill also would establish a new criminal felony of incompatible negotiations for those persons who, in their capacity of managing the educational institution’s assets, enter into any transaction with related parties having any personal interest or granting benefits to third parties without complying with the foregoing requirements. Among the sanctions for breaching such regulations, the person may be subject to imprisonment plus a fine of double the amount of the benefit that such person or entity had obtained. On July 17, 2017, the Chamber of Deputies, which is the lower house of the Chilean Congress, passed the 2017 Higher Education Bill, substantially in the form described above. The 2017 Higher Education Bill has now moved to the Chilean Senate, where it has been referred for consideration by the Senate Education Commission. Members of the Chamber of Deputies have announced that they intend to bring constitutional challenges to 16 provisions of the bill passed by the Chamber of Deputies. If the 2017 Higher Education Bill is passed by the Chilean Senate without resolving the challenged provisions, those provisions would be referred to the Chilean Constitutional Court for resolution prior to the bill taking effect. We are currently evaluating the effect the proposed 2017 Higher Education Bill would have on the Chilean institutions in the Laureate International Universities network if it is adopted in the form introduced in the Chilean Congress and approved by the Chamber of Deputies. We cannot predict whether or not the proposed 2017 Higher Education Bill will be adopted in this form or if it, or any part of it, will survive constitutional challenge, or if any higher education legislation will be adopted that would affect the institutions in the Laureate International Universities network. However, if any such legislation is adopted, it could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition. As the Company currently consolidates certain of its institutions in Chile under the variable interest entity model, the Company will review such consolidation upon passage of any new higher education bill. Deconsolidation of one or more of our Chilean institutions, if required, could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations.

X
- References No definition available. + Details
Name: | us-gaap_CommitmentsAndContingenciesDisclosureAbstract
Namespace Prefix: | us-gaap_
Data Type: | xbrli:stringItemType
Balance Type: | na
Period Type: | duration

X
- Definition The entire disclosure for legal proceedings, legal contingencies, litigation, regulatory and environmental matters and other contingencies. + References No definition available. + Details
Name: | us-gaap_LegalMattersAndContingenciesTextBlock
Namespace Prefix: | us-gaap_
Data Type: | nonnum:textBlockItemType
Balance Type: | na
Period Type: | duration