XML 72 R16.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.8
Fair Value Measurements
 9 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2014
Fair Value Measurements  
Fair Value Measurements

9.  Fair Value Measurements

 

The accounting standard for fair value measurements and disclosures establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into the following three broad categories.

 

·         Level 1 — Quoted unadjusted prices for identical instruments in active markets to which we have access at the date of measurement.

 

·         Level 2 — Quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active; and model-derived valuations in which all significant inputs and significant value drivers are observable in active markets. Level 2 inputs are those in markets for which there are few transactions, the prices are not current, little public information exists or prices vary substantially over time or among brokered market makers.

 

·         Level 3 — Model derived valuations in which one or more significant inputs or significant value drivers are unobservable. Unobservable inputs are those inputs that reflect our own assumptions regarding how market participants would price the asset or liability based on the best available information.

 

The following table presents our assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, with pricing levels as of the date of valuation (in thousands):

 

 

 

September 30, 2014

 

December 31, 2013

 

 

 

(Level 1)

 

(Level 2)

 

(Level 3)

 

(Level 1)

 

(Level 2)

 

(Level 3)

 

Interest rate swaps asset

 

$

—

 

$

2,925

 

$

—

 

$

—

 

$

322

 

$

—

 

Interest rate swaps liability

 

—

 

(5,225

)

—

 

—

 

(3,374

)

—

 

 

On a quarterly basis, the interest rate swaps are recorded at fair value utilizing a combination of the market approach and income approach to estimate fair value based on forward LIBOR curves.

 

The following table presents our assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis during the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, with pricing levels as of the date of valuation (in thousands):

 

 

 

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2014

 

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2013

 

 

 

(Level 1)

 

(Level 2)

 

(Level 3)

 

(Level 1)

 

(Level 2)

 

(Level 3)

 

Impaired long-lived assets

 

$

—

 

$

—

 

$

2,472

 

$

—

 

$

—

 

$

5,508

 

Inventory write-down—Restructuring

 

—

 

—

 

2,331

 

—

 

—

 

—

 

Impaired long-lived assets—Discontinued operations

 

—

 

—

 

—

 

—

 

—

 

—

 

Long-term receivable from the sale of our Canadian Operations

 

—

 

—

 

—

 

—

 

—

 

7,556

 

 

Our estimate of the impaired long-lived assets’ fair value was primarily based on either the expected net sale proceeds compared to other fleet units we recently sold and/or a review of other units recently offered for sale by third parties, or the estimated component value of the equipment we plan to use. We discounted the expected proceeds, net of selling and other carrying costs, using a weighted average disposal period of four years and a discount rate of 9%. Impaired long-lived assets in the table above also includes our estimate of the fair value of the impaired assets of the entity that owned our fabrication facility in the United Kingdom, which was based on the net transaction value set forth in our July 2013 agreement to sell this entity. Our estimate of the fair value of the inventory associated with the restructuring of our make-ready operations was based on expected net sale proceeds. See Note 11 for further discussion of the restructuring of our make-ready operations. Our estimate of the fair value of the impaired assets that are classified as discontinued operations was based on our expected proceeds, net of selling costs. Our estimate of the fair value of the long-term receivable from the sale of our Canadian Operations, which included a note receivable and contingent consideration, was discounted based on a settlement period of 5.5 years, a discount rate of 13% and a probability weighted factor of the achievement of the specified performance threshold.