XML 70 R17.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.3.0.814
Fair Value Measurements
 9 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2015
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]  
Fair Value Measurements
10. Fair Value Measurements
 
The accounting standard for fair value measurements and disclosures establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into the following three broad categories:
 
•
Level 1 — Quoted unadjusted prices for identical instruments in active markets to which we have access at the date of measurement.

•
Level 2 — Quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active; and model-derived valuations in which all significant inputs and significant value drivers are observable in active markets. Level 2 inputs are those in markets for which there are few transactions, the prices are not current, little public information exists or prices vary substantially over time or among brokered market makers.

•
Level 3 — Model derived valuations in which one or more significant inputs or significant value drivers are unobservable. Unobservable inputs are those inputs that reflect our own assumptions regarding how market participants would price the asset or liability based on the best available information.
 
The following table presents our assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, with pricing levels as of the date of valuation (in thousands):
 
 
September 30, 2015
 
December 31, 2014
 
(Level 1)
 
(Level 2)
 
(Level 3)
 
(Level 1)
 
(Level 2)
 
(Level 3)
Interest rate swaps asset
$
—

 
$
—

 
$
—

 
$
—

 
$
712

 
$
—

Interest rate swaps liability
—

 
(10,988
)
 
—

 
—

 
(5,108
)
 
—


 
On a quarterly basis, the interest rate swaps are recorded at fair value utilizing a combination of the market approach and income approach to estimate fair value based on forward LIBOR curves.

The following table presents our assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis during the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, with pricing levels as of the date of valuation (in thousands):
 
 
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2015
 
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2014
 
(Level 1)
 
(Level 2)
 
(Level 3)
 
(Level 1)
 
(Level 2)
 
(Level 3)
Impaired long-lived assets
$
—

 
$
—

 
$
6,156

 
$
—

 
$
—

 
$
2,472

Long-term receivable from the sale of our Canadian Operations
—

 
—

 
5,100

 
—

 
—

 
—


 
Our estimate of the impaired long-lived assets’ fair value was primarily based on either the expected net sale proceeds compared to other fleet units we recently sold and/or a review of other units recently offered for sale by third parties, or the estimated component value of the equipment we plan to use. We discounted the expected proceeds, net of selling and other carrying costs, using a weighted average disposal period of four years and a weighted average discount rate of 10% and 9% for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively. In April 2015, we accepted an offer to early settle the outstanding note receivable due to us relating to the previous sale of our Canadian contract operations and aftermarket services businesses (“Canadian Operations”) for $5.1 million.