XML 47 R30.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT
v3.24.3

Contingencies | 12 Months Ended
--- | ---
Dec. 31, 2023
Contingencies [Abstract] |
Contingencies |
25. | Contingencies
As of December 31, 2023, the Company has the following contingencies:
| a. | Pacific Steel, Inc. (PS), a subsidiary located in National City in San Diego County, California, United States, for which the main activity is the purchase and sale of scrap, has the following environmental contingencies:
California Department of Toxic Substances Control On September 2002, the Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) inspected PS facilities based on an alleged complaint from neighbors due to PS’s excavating to recover scrap metal on its property and on a neighboring property, which PS rents from a third party (BNSF Railway). In this same month, DTSC issued an enforcement order of imminent and substantial endangerment determination, which alleges that certain soil piles, soil management and metal recovery operations may cause an imminent and substantial danger to human health and the environment; consequently, DTSC sanctioned PS for violating Hazardous Waste Control Laws in the State of California and imposed the obligation to remedy the site. On July 26, 2004, in an effort to continue with this order, DTSC filed against PS a Complaint for Civil Penalties and Injunctive Relief in San Diego Superior Court. On July 26, 2004, the court issued a judgment, whereby PS was obligated to pay USD$ 0.2 million, which has been paid. On June 6, 2010, the DTSC and the San Diego Department of Environmental Health (DEH) inspected the facilities of PS, in response to a general complaint. On August 10, 2010 DTSC and DEH conducted a second inspection and found seven infractions. The DEH is satisfied with the compliance of PS on those issues; however, on October 19, 2010 the technical division of the DTSC recommended to the legal division of DTSC that it impose significant penalties. The land remediation was suspended at the beginning of 2011 due to the inefficiency of the process, which was verified by several studies. As an alternative, once the necessary permits were obtained from the authorities in Mexico, the Mexicali plant began the process of importing non-RCRA soil for final disposal in a secure landfill based in Nuevo Leon State. This landfill is deposited after the separation of the metal content, which is used as raw material in the melting process. PS has completed the shipment of non-RCRA soil for final disposal in Nuevo Leon State. The disposition of a stack estimated at 8,000 tons of material classified RCRA (hazardous for Federal purposes) was also considered for shipment to Mexico. The process began in early 2013, but the response from the authorities was slow. Therefore, on April 9, 2015, a letter from the California Attorney General Department of Justice (Attorney General) was received where PS is required to, in the absence of obtaining permission from the Mexican authorities; present a program for transport the pile of contaminated soil classified as RCRA to an authorized confinement in the United States at the latest on April 22, 2015. This letter warned that PS must ship the RCRA soil no later than July 9, 2015, or risk DTSC proceeding with a civil lawsuit seeking the maximum amount of fines established by law and corresponding legal redress. On April 21, 2015, PS sent a letter to the Attorney General explaining that the authorities in Mexico had not denied permission to the Company but had simply requested that it present its application in a different format, which had already been presented and reviewed by the authority on April 17, 2015. On July 23, 2015, the Attorney General denied the extension requested by PS and demanded the immediate shipments of the RCRA stack to an authorized landfill. PS began transporting RCRA soil on July, 29, 2015, and completed removal of the RCRA stack by September 12, 2015 with a total of 3,000 metric tons. On January 5, 2016, the Attorney General and PS stipulated to filing a “final judgment and order on consent” or Consent Judgment in San Diego Superior Court. The parties negotiated the Consent Judgment, which includes the following terms:
| - | PS to pay USD$ 0.138 million as a civil penalty for alleged violations of the 2004 Corrective Action Consent Agreement. PS has made all of the required payments to DTSC as of December 31, 2017.
| - | Remove the RCRA soil pile and send it to an approved landfill. The Judgment indicates that the Company complied with this commitment by October 2, 2015.
| - | After eliminating the soil pile of RCRA, the Company should take samples of the floor in which it was located. Samples were taken and the results indicate that the floor had pollution levels that exceeded the limits established by Government. In April 7, 2016, the General Prosecutor and the DTSC required that the Company would turn over the floor ten feet wide and two feet down in the perimeter of the area in which was located the soil pile RCRA and to dispose it in an approved confinement. In turn, PS convinced to DTSC to reach a Turnpike Agreement at august 10, for which would be paid during two years (up to August 10, 2018). The Agreement was extended, as of August 10, 2018, for a two years additional period, in force up to August 10, 2020. These Agreement had another extension, in force up to August 10, 2021. And has not been renewed.
| - | The Company shall continue to meet the conditions of the final judgment, the corrective measures, and all tasks arising from this, which were entered in the same court in 2004.
On May 29, 2019, the company submitted a proposal with a new work plan (IM Work Plan) to DTSC to conduct soil remediation on the BNSF Railway lease. On October 21, 2021, The Company submitted the final draft of the IM work plan which DTSC has agreed to that proposal or work plan, on May 31, 2022. No litigation was filed against the DTSC approval which is now final. On December 6, 2022, the DTSC sent a letter requesting a preliminary study and a work plan implementation schedule, both documents were delivered on February 3, 2023. DTSC has not responded to either document. On January 13, 2023, BNSF Railway issued a contract termination notice to PS, notifying BNSF’s unilateral termination of two lease contracts with PS which ended on February 12 and 22, 2023, through its legal counsel informed PS that no longer has access to BNSF Railway property. DTSC is entering into a voluntary agreement with BNSF to implement a work plan. March 7, 2023, PS became aware that DTSC entered into a voluntary agreement with BNSF to implement the IM workplan on BNSF property. We are informed that BNSF performed the IM workplan under DTSC’s supervision. On June 29, 2023, BNSF filed suit against PS in the Southern District of California. (See BNSF Railway Company v. Pacific Steel, Inc., 23CV1202 BEN KSC, United States District Court, Southern District of California.) BNSF’s complaint alleges causes of action for specific performance, breach of contract, breach of implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, express contractual indemnity, nuisance, trespass, negligence, waste, equitable and implied indemnity, contribution under the Hazardous Substances Account Act, contribution under federal common law, and declaratory relief. As of the date of these consolidated financial statements, we cannot estimate the costs of implementing the work plan of the provisional measures due to the uncertainty of whether BNSF or PS will implement the work and the DTSC authorizations to whom they designate and their approval date.
| b. | As with most steel producers in United States, Republic could incur significant costs related to environmental issues in the future, including those arising from environmental compliance activities and remediation stemming from historical waste management practices at the Republic’s facilities. The reserve created to cover probable environmental liabilities of USD$ 2.5 million, USD$ 2.5 million and USD$ 2.5 million were recorded as of December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021, respectively. The reserve includes incremental direct costs of remediation efforts and post-remediation monitoring costs that are expected to be paid after corrective actions are complete. As of December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021, the current and non-current portions of the reserve amounted to USD$ 1.0 million, USD$ 1.0 million and USD$ 1.5 million, respectively, are included payable and accumulated liabilities in the short and long term, respectively, in the Consolidated Statements of Financial Position. On February 6, 2023, The US EPA and the Company entered into a Consent Decree whereby the company is required to install certain emission controls at the Canton facility, conduct compliance testing and implement related monitoring and record keeping. Civil penalties of $990.00 In December 2023, the U.S. EPA assessed a $700,000 civil penalty on the Company related to violations of the U.S. Clean Water Act. Such penalty has been accrued in the other accrued expenses in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2023. These penalties have been recorded as of December 31, 2023.
| c. | The Company is not aware of any material environmental remediation liabilities or contingent liabilities relating to environmental matters with respect to facilities, for which the establishment of an additional reserve would be necessary at this time. In the event that, in the future, the Company incurs in any such additional expenses, these costs will most likely be incurred over a number of years. However, future regulatory action regarding historical waste management practice in the facilities of Republic PS and future changes in applicable laws and regulations may require the Company to incur significant costs that may have a material adverse effect on the future financial performance of the Company.
| d. | The Company is involved in a series of lawsuits and legal claims that have arisen during the normal course of its operations. The Company and its legal advisors do not expect the outcome of these matters to have any significant adverse effect on the Company’s financial position and results of operations, therefore it has not been recognized any liabilities for such lawsuits and claims.
| e. | Mexican tax authorities have the right to review, at least the previous five years and could determine differences in taxes payable, plus any corresponding adjustments, surcharges and fines.
| f. | Tax authorities in the United States have the right to review, at least the previous three years and could determine differences in taxes payable, plus its corresponding adjustments, surcharges and fines.
| g. | Canadian tax authorities have the right to review, at least the previous four years and could determine differences in taxes payable, plus its corresponding adjustments, surcharges and fines.
| h. | Brazilian tax authorities have the right to review, at least the previous five years and could determine differences in taxes payable, plus its corresponding adjustments, surcharges and fines.
| i. | On August 19, 2022, the Steelworkers Pension Trust filed suit against the Company in Pennsylvania Federal Court alleging the Company failed to pay the amount of certain monthly pension contributions to the Steelworkers Pension Trust. On January 4, 2023, the Pennsylvania Federal Court issued a decision in favor of the Steelworkers Pension Trust in the amount of $1,274,075, as well as permitted the Steelworkers Pension Trust to seek additional amounts for unpaid contributions in November 2022. Derived from the above, the Company, as of December 31, 2023, recognized a provision for USD $8,345,769.
| j. | On September 5, 2017, Grupo Simec and GV do Brasil were notified of the arbitration procedure filed by SMS Concast at the International Court of Arbitration (ICC), which demands the payment of USD $ 1.4 million plus expenses, for additional costs incurred in the construction and assembly of the steelmaking area of the Brazilian plant. On November 6, 2017, the companies of the Group replied to the demand and filed a counterclaim against SMS Concast for the amount of USD $ 5 million, which GV do Brasil utilized on the equipment to work properly. On February 26, 2020, The company was notified of the judgment. In March 2021, it was agreed with the actor to conclude the matter by paying USD $ 450 thousand dollars, after several changes of dates, the payment was made on July 8, 2021.
| k. | Related to Republic Steel’s audits of GST for the periods 2015-2016 and 2017-2018 made by the Canadian Revenue Agency (CRA), amounts of USD $4,178,517 plus interest for the period 2015-2016 and USD $6,372,306 plus interest for the period 2017-2018 were determined by the CRA. The Company presented a notice of objection for the 2015-2016 period on September 2018 and another for the 2017-2018 period on March 2021. This matter was settled during the year ended December 31, 2021.
| l. | In connection with a sale and use tax audit by the Ohio Department of Taxes covering the period from January 1, 2009 to December 31, 2012, an assessment of $ 2,452,028 (including interests of $ 394,138) against the Company was issued, on December 9, 2016.
Republic also received an appraisal notice dated December 11, 2020 for $1,631,827 (including interest of $339,885) covering the period January 1, 2014 to September 30, 2018. The Company does not agree with the evaluations in their entirety and has filed a Petitions for Reassessment on January 30, 2017, February 9, 2022 and in September 2022 appealing the assessments to the Ohio Board of Tax Appeals. The Company’s position is that the assessment that certain services were taxable is substantively incorrect, and based upon a misinterpretation of the relevant regulations and a misunderstanding of the facts that led the Company to determine that the services qualified for Ohio’s sales and use tax exemption for manufacturers. Due to the nature of this matter and the uncertainty of the resolution on the appeal that is in the early stages, the Company has not recorded an expense in the fiscal year 2023, 2022 or 2021 that recognizes the evaluation or any estimated amount of liquidation.

X
- References No definition available. + Details
Name: | ifrs-full_DisclosureOfContingentLiabilitiesAbstract
Namespace Prefix: | ifrs-full_
Data Type: | xbrli:stringItemType
Balance Type: | na
Period Type: | duration

X
- Definition The disclosure of contingent liabilities. [Refer: Classes of contingent liabilities [domain]] + References Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/disclosureRef -Name IAS -Number 37 -IssueDate 2024-01-01 -Paragraph 86 -URI https://taxonomy.ifrs.org/xifrs-link?type=IAS&num=37&code=ifrs-tx-2024-en-r&anchor=para_86&doctype=Standard -URIDate 2024-03-27 + Details
Name: | ifrs-full_DisclosureOfContingentLiabilitiesExplanatory
Namespace Prefix: | ifrs-full_
Data Type: | dtr-2022:textBlockItemType
Balance Type: | na
Period Type: | duration