XML 1095 R14.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT
v2.4.1.9

Inventory Impairments and Land Option Contract Abandonments | 12 Months Ended
--- | ---
Nov. 30, 2014
Inventory Impairments and Land Option Contract Abandonments [Abstract] |
Inventory Impairments and Land Option Contract Abandonments | Inventory Impairments and Land Option Contract Abandonments E ach community or land parcel in our owned inventory is assessed to determine if indicators of potential impairment exist. Impairment indicators are assessed separately for each community or land parcel on a quarterly basis and include, but are not limited to the following: significant decreases in net orders, average selling prices, volume of homes delivered, gross profit margins on homes delivered or projected gross profit margins on homes in backlog or future deliveries; significant increases in budgeted land development and home construction costs or cancellation rates; or projected losses on expected future land sales. If indicators of potential impairment exist for a community or land parcel, the identified asset is evaluated for recoverability in accordance with ASC 360. We evaluated 32, 31 and 61 communities or land parcels for recoverability during the years ended November 30, 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The carrying value of those communities or land parcels evaluated was $266.9 million, $146.0 million and $317.4 million during the years ended November 30, 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively. As impairment indicators are assessed on a quarterly basis, some of the communities or land parcels evaluated during these years were evaluated in more than one quarterly period. Communities or land parcels evaluated for recoverability in more than one quarterly period, if any, are counted only once for each period shown. When an indicator of potential impairment is identified for a community or land parcel, we test the asset for recoverability by comparing the carrying value of the asset to the undiscounted future net cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. The undiscounted future net cash flows are impacted by then-current conditions and trends in the market in which the asset is located as well as factors known to us at the time the cash flows are calculated. With the undiscounted future net cash flows, we also consider recent trends in our orders, backlog, cancellation rates and volume of homes delivered, as well as our expectations related to the following: product offerings; market supply and demand, including estimated average selling prices and related price appreciation; and land development, home construction and overhead costs to be incurred and related cost inflation. With respect to the years ended November 30, 2014 and 2013, these expectations reflected our experience that, notwithstanding fluctuations in our company-wide net orders, backlog levels, homes delivered and housing gross profit margin, on a year-over-year basis, conditions in the markets where assessed assets were located have been generally stable or improved, with no significant deterioration identified, or projected, as to revenue and cost drivers that would prevent or otherwise impact recoverability. In the fourth quarter of 2014, a few active communities located in particular areas experienced a softening in demand as the quarter progressed, with increased pricing pressure and continued cost pressure, among other things. We also saw increased use of sales incentives and price reductions on completed homes. However, these were isolated, location-specific instances that we believe are not indicative of a significant deterioration of the related markets generally. Based on this experience, and taking into account the signs of stability and improvement in many markets for new home sales, our inventory assessments as of November 30, 2014 considered an expected steady overall sales pace and average selling price performance for 2015 relative to the pace and performance in recent quarters. In the fourth quarter of 2013, our West Coast homebuilding reporting segment reported year-over-year decreases in homes delivered, net orders and ending backlog, these decreases were largely due to our selling through older communities and shifting our investment strategy to favor coastal California submarkets, and delays in opening new communities, and were not reflective of a decline in market conditions, particularly as the average selling price of homes delivered in the segment increased in the 2013 fourth quarter and the housing gross profit margin improved. Given the inherent challenges and uncertainties in forecasting future results, our inventory assessments at the time they are made take into consideration whether a community or land parcel is active, meaning whether it is open for sales and/or undergoing development, or whether it is being held for future development. Due to the short-term nature of active communities and land parcels as compared to land held for future development, our inventory assessments generally assume the continuation of then-current market conditions, subject to identifying information suggesting significant sustained changes in such conditions. These assessments, at the time made, generally anticipate net orders, average selling prices, volume of homes delivered and costs for land development and home construction to continue at or near then-current levels through the particular asset’s estimated remaining life. Inventory assessments for our land held for future development consider then-current market conditions as well as subjective forecasts regarding the timing and costs of land development and home construction and related cost inflation; the product(s) to be offered; and the net orders, volume of homes delivered, and selling prices and related price appreciation of the offered product(s) when an associated community is anticipated to open for sales. We evaluate various factors to develop these forecasts, including the availability of and demand for homes and finished lots within the relevant marketplace; historical, current and expected future sales trends for the marketplace; and third-party data, if available. These various estimates, trends, expectations and assumptions used in each of our inventory assessments are specific to each community or land parcel based on what we believe are reasonable forecasts for performance and may vary among communities or land parcels and may vary over time. We record an inventory impairment charge when the carrying value of a real estate asset is greater than the undiscounted future net cash flows the asset is expected to generate. These real estate assets are written down to fair value, which is primarily based on the estimated future net cash flows discounted for inherent risk associated with each such asset. Inputs used in our calculation of estimated discounted future net cash flows are specific to each affected real estate asset and are based on our expectations for each such asset as of the applicable measurement date, including, among others, expectations related to average selling prices and volume of homes delivered. The discount rates we used were impacted by the following at the time the calculation was made: the risk-free rate of return; expected risk premium based on estimated land development, home construction and delivery timelines; market risk from potential future price erosion; cost uncertainty due to land development or home construction cost increases; and other risks specific to the asset or conditions in the market in which the asset is located. Inventories associated with planned future land sales are stated at the lower of their costs or fair values, less costs to sell. The estimated fair value of such assets is generally based on an executed contract, broker quotes or similar information. The following table summarizes ranges for significant quantitative unobservable inputs we utilized in our fair value measurements with respect to the impaired communities, other than land held for sale, written down to fair value during the years presented:
|  | Years Ended November 30,
Unobservable Input (a) |  | 2014 |  | 2013 |  | 2012
Average selling price |  | $216,100 - $316,800 |  | $339,700 |  | $115,200 - $556,300
Deliveries per month |  | 1 - 4 |  | 1 |  | 1 - 6
Discount rate |  | 17% - 19% |  | 17% |  | 17% - 20%
(a) | The ranges of inputs used in each period primarily reflect differences between the housing markets where each of the impacted communities or land parcels are located, rather than fluctuations in prevailing market conditions.
Based on the results of our evaluations, we recognized inventory impairment charges of $37.6 million in 2014 associated with eight communities or land parcels, with a post-impairment fair value of $30.6 million. In 2014, $26.6 million of these charges related to two properties where we decided to change our strategy and monetize our investment through land sales rather than build and sell homes on the parcels as previously intended. One of the properties was our last remaining land parcel in Atlanta, Georgia, a former market where we do not have ongoing operations; the sale of this parcel closed in the 2014 fourth quarter. The other property was an 80 acre land parcel located in the Coachella Valley area of southern California, an inland submarket that has not recovered as quickly as we had anticipated and where we no longer actively participate. In addition, this parcel was earmarked for a specific type of development that was not aligned with our core business and would have required significant additional investment dollars in land development and infrastructure over an extended period of time to build out. Taking these factors into account, we decided to sell the parcel to redeploy the cash to projects that are expected to generate higher returns in a shorter period. The remainder, or $11.0 million, of the inventory impairment charges in 2014 related to six communities primarily located in inland California and Arizona. We had previously suspended development activity on a portion of these communities. However, based on our evaluation of the submarkets where these assets are located, we decided to monetize our investment in these land positions sooner by opening for sales more quickly and accelerating the overall timing and pace for building and delivering homes. The balance of the 2014 impairment charges were related to a few active communities located in particular submarkets that have somewhat softened. In the two-year period prior to the 2014 fourth quarter, we activated more than 30 communities, of which only three had impairment charges at the time of their activation or in a subsequent period. To the extent we change our strategy on any given asset, it is possible that we may have additional impairments in the future. In 2013, we recognized inventory impairment charges of $.4 million associated with one community, with a post-impairment fair value of $1.1 million. In 2012, we recognized inventory impairment charges of $28.1 million associated with 14 communities, with a post-impairment fair value of $39.9 million. The inventory impairment charges we recognized in 2012 reflected challenging economic and housing market conditions in certain of our served markets in that year and were partly due to changes in our operational or selling strategy for certain communities in an effort to accelerate sales and/or our return on investment. In some cases, we have recognized inventory impairment charges for particular communities or land parcels in multiple years. Inventory impairment charges are included in construction and land costs in our consolidated statements of operations. As of November 30, 2014, the aggregate carrying value of our inventory that had been impacted by inventory impairment charges was $266.6 million, representing 33 communities and various other land parcels. As of November 30, 2013, the aggregate carrying value of our inventory that had been impacted by inventory impairment charges was $293.1 million, representing 42 communities and various other land parcels. Our inventory controlled under land option contracts and other similar contracts is assessed to determine whether it continues to meet our internal investment and marketing standards. Assessments are made separately for each optioned land parcel on a quarterly basis and are affected by the following factors relative to the market in which the asset is located, among others: current and/or anticipated net orders, average selling prices and volume of homes delivered; estimated land development and home construction costs; and projected profitability on expected future housing or land sales. When a decision is made not to exercise certain land option contracts and other similar contracts due to market conditions and/or changes in our marketing strategy, we write off the related inventory costs, including non-refundable deposits and unrecoverable pre-acquisition costs. Based on the results of our assessments, we recognized land option contract abandonment charges of $1.8 million corresponding to 1,306 lots in 2014, $3.2 million corresponding to 295 lots in 2013, and $.4 million corresponding to 446 lots in 2012. We sometimes abandon land option contracts or other similar contracts when we have incurred costs of less than $100,000; such costs and the corresponding lots, which totaled 7,292 lots in 2014, 9,406 lots in 2013 and 8,157 in 2012, are not included in the amounts above. Land option contract abandonment charges are included in construction and land costs in our consolidated statements of operations. The estimated remaining life of each community or land parcel in our inventory depends on various factors, such as the total number of lots remaining; the expected timeline to acquire and entitle land and develop lots to build homes; the anticipated future net order and cancellation rates; and the expected timeline to build and deliver homes sold. While it is difficult to determine a precise timeframe for any particular inventory asset, based on current market conditions and expected delivery timelines, we estimate our inventory assets’ remaining operating lives to range generally from one year to in excess of 10 years, and expect to realize, on an overall basis, the majority of our current inventory balance within five years. Due to the judgment and assumptions applied in our inventory impairment and land option contract abandonment assessment processes, and in our estimations of the remaining operating lives of our inventory assets and the realization of our inventory balances, particularly as to land held for future development, it is possible that actual results could differ substantially from those estimated.

X
- Details
Name: | kbh_InventoryImpairmentsAndLandOptionContractAbandonmentsAbstract
Namespace Prefix: | kbh_
Data Type: | xbrli:stringItemType
Balance Type: | na
Period Type: | duration

X
- Definition The entire disclosure for the details of the charge against earnings resulting from the aggregate write down of all assets from their carrying value to their fair value. Disclosure may also include a description of the impaired asset and facts and circumstances leading to the impairment, amount of the impairment loss and where the loss is located in the income statement, method(s) for determining fair value, and the segment in which the impaired asset is reported. + References No definition available. + Details
Name: | us-gaap_AssetImpairmentChargesTextBlock
Namespace Prefix: | us-gaap_
Data Type: | nonnum:textBlockItemType
Balance Type: | na
Period Type: | duration