XML 22 R9.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT
v3.23.1

Management's Use of Accounting Judgments, Estimates and Assumptions | 12 Months Ended
--- | ---
Dec. 31, 2022
Managements Use Of Accounting Judgments Estimates And Assumptions [Abstract] |
Management’s Use of Accounting Judgments, Estimates and Assumptions | 3. Management’s Use of Accounting Judgments, Estimates and Assumptions The preparation of our consolidated financial statements in conformity with IFRS requires us to make judgments, estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of our revenues, expenses, assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent liabilities at the end of each reporting period. The uncertainties inherent in these assumptions and estimates could result in outcomes that could require a material adjustment to the carrying amount of the assets or liabilities affected in the future years. Judgments and estimates are continually evaluated and are based on historical experience and other factors, including expectations of future events that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. Judgments, key assumptions concerning the future, and other key sources of estimation uncertainty at the end of the reporting period, that have a significant risk of causing a material adjustment to the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities within the next reporting period are consistent with those applied in the most recent annual financial statements. Selected critical judgments and estimates applied in the preparation of the consolidated financial statements are discussed below: Judgments In the process of applying our accounting policies, management has made judgments, apart from those involving estimations which have the most significant effect on the amounts recognized in our consolidated financial statements. Revenue Recognition Identifying performance obligations We identify performance obligations by considering whether the promised goods or services in the contract are distinct goods or services. A good or service is distinct when the customer can benefit from the good or service on its own or together with other resources that are readily available to the customer and our promise to transfer the good or service to the customer is separately identifiable from the other promises in the contract. Revenues earned from multiple element arrangements offered by our fixed line and wireless businesses are split into separately identifiable performance obligations based on their relative stand-alone selling price in order to reflect the substance of the transaction. The transaction price represents the best evidence of stand-alone selling price for the services we offer since this is the observable price we charge if our services are sold separately. We account for customer contracts in accordance with IFRS 15 and have concluded that the service (telecommunication service) and non-service components (handset or equipment) may be accounted for as separate performance obligations. The handset or equipment is delivered first, followed by the telecommunication service (which is provided over the contract/lock-in period of generally two years). Revenue attributable to the separate performance obligations are based on the allocation of the transaction price relative to the stand-alone selling price. Installation fees for voice and data services that are not custom built for the subscribers are considered as a single performance obligation together with monthly service fees, recognized over the customer subscription period since the subscriber cannot benefit from the installation services on its own or together with other resources that are readily available to the subscriber. On the other hand, installation fees of data services that are custom built for the subscribers are considered as a separate performance obligation and is recognized upon completion of the installation services. Activation fees for both voice and data services are also considered as a single performance obligation together with monthly service fees, recognized over the customer subscription period. Principal versus agent consideration We enter into contracts with our customers involving multiple deliverable arrangements. We determined that we control the goods before they are transferred to customers, and we have the ability to direct the use of the inventory. The following factors indicate that we control the goods before they are being transferred to customers. • We are primarily responsible for fulfilling the promise to provide the specified equipment; • We bear inventory risk on our inventory before it has been transferred to the customer; • We have discretion in establishing the prices for the other party’s goods or services and, therefore, the benefit that we can receive from those goods or services is not limited. It is incumbent upon us to establish the price of our services to be offered to our subscribers; and • Our consideration in these contracts is the entire consideration billed to the service provider. Based on the foregoing, we are considered the principal in our contracts with other service providers except for certain VAS arrangements. We have the primary obligation to provide the services to the subscriber. Timing of revenue recognition We recognize revenues from contracts with customers over time or at a point in time depending on our evaluation of when the customer obtains control of the promised goods or services and based on the extent of progress towards completion of the performance obligation. For the telecommunication service which is provided over the contract period of two or more years, revenue is recognized monthly as we provide the service because control is transferred over time. For the device which is sold at the inception of the contract, revenue is recognized at the time of delivery because control is transferred at a point in time. Identifying methods for measuring progress of revenue recognized over time We determine the appropriate method of measuring progress which is either through the use of input or output methods. Input method recognizes revenue on the basis of the entity’s efforts or inputs to the satisfaction of a performance obligation while output method recognizes revenue on the basis of direct measurements of the value to the customer of the goods or services transferred to date. Revenue from telecommunication services is recognized through the use of input method wherein recognition is over time based on the customer subscription period since the customer simultaneously receives and consumes the benefits as the seller renders the services. Significant financing component We concluded that the handset component included in contracts with customers has a significant financing component considering the period between the time of the transfer of control over the handset and the customer’s payment of the price of the handset, which is more than one year. In determining the interest to be applied to the amount of consideration, we concluded that the interest rate is the market interest rate adjusted with credit spread to reflect the customer credit risk that is commensurate with the rate that would be reflected in a separate financing transaction between us and our customer at contract inception. Estimation of stand-alone selling price We assessed that the service and non-service components represent separate performance obligations and thus, the amount of revenues should be recognized based on the allocation of the transaction price to the different performance obligations based on their stand-alone selling prices. The stand-alone selling price is the price at which we sell the good or service separately to a customer. However, if goods or services are not currently offered separately, we use the adjusted market or cost-plus margin method to determine the stand-alone selling price to be used in the revenue allocation. In terms of allocation of transaction price between performance obligations, we assessed that allocating the transaction price using the stand-alone selling prices of the services and handset will result in more revenue allocated to non-service component. The stand-alone selling price is based on the price in which we regularly sell the non-service and service component in a separate transaction. Financial Instruments Evaluation of business models in managing financial instruments We determine our business model at the level that best reflects how we manage groups of financial assets to achieve our business objective. Our business model is not assessed on an instrument-by-instrument basis, but a higher level of aggregated portfolios and is based on observable factors such as: a. How the performance of the business model and the financial assets held within that business model are evaluated and reported to the entity’s key management personnel; b. The risks that affect the performance of the business model (and the financial assets held within that business model) and, in particular, the way those risks are managed; and c. The expected frequency, value and timing of sales are also important aspects of our assessment. The business model assessment is based on reasonably expected scenarios without taking ‘worst case’ or ‘stress case’ scenarios into account. If cash flows after initial recognition are realized in a way that is different from our original expectations, we do not change the classification of the remaining financial assets held in that business model, but incorporates such information when assessing newly originated or newly purchased financial assets going forward. We have determined that for cash and cash equivalents, short-term investments, investment in debt securities and other long-term investments, and trade and other receivables, the business model is to collect the contractual cash flows until maturity. IFRS 9, however, emphasizes that if more than an infrequent number of sales are made out of a portfolio and those sales are more than insignificant in value, of financial assets carried at amortized cost, we should assess whether and how such sales are consistent with the objective of collecting contractual cash flows. Definition of default and credit-impaired financial assets We define a financial instrument as in default, which is fully aligned with the definition of credit-impaired, when it meets one or more of the following criteria: • Quantitative criteria For trade receivables and all other financial assets subject to impairment, default occurs when the receivable becomes 90 days past due, except for trade receivables from Corporate subscribers, which are determined to be in default when the receivables become 120 days past due. • Qualitative criteria The counterparty meets unlikeliness to pay criteria, which indicates the counterparty is in significant financial difficulty. These are instances where: a. The counterparty is experiencing financial difficulty or is insolvent; b. The counterparty is in breach of financial covenant(s); c. An active market for that financial assets has disappeared because of financial difficulties; d. Concessions have been granted by us, for economic or contractual reasons relating to the counterparty’s financial difficulty; e. It is becoming probable that the counterparty will enter bankruptcy or other financial reorganization; and f. Financial assets are purchased or originated at a deep discount that reflects the incurred credit losses. The criteria above have been applied to all financial instruments, except FVPL, held by us and are consistent with the definition of default used for internal credit risk management purposes. The default definition has been applied consistently to the ECL models throughout our expected loss calculation. Significant increase in credit risk At each reporting date, we assess whether there has been a significant increase in credit risk for financial assets since initial recognition by comparing the risk of default occurring over the expected life between the reporting date and the date of initial recognition. We consider reasonable and supportable information that is relevant and available without undue cost or effort for this purpose. This includes quantitative and qualitative information and forward-looking analysis. An exposure will migrate through the ECL stages as asset quality deteriorates. If, in a subsequent period, asset quality improves and also reverses any previously assessed significant increase in credit risk since origination, then the loss allowance measurement reverts from lifetime ECL to 12-month ECL. Using our judgment and, where possible, relevant historical experience, we may determine that an exposure has undergone a significant increase in credit risk based on particular qualitative indicators that we consider are indicative of such and whose effect may not otherwise be fully reflected in its quantitative analysis on a timely basis. As a backstop, we consider that a significant increase in credit risk occurs no later than when an asset is more than 30 days past due. Days past due are determined by counting the number of days since the earliest elapsed due date in respect of which full payment has not been received. Due dates are determined without considering any grace period that might be available to the counterparty. Exposures that have not deteriorated significantly since origination, or where the deterioration remains within our investment grade criteria, or which are less than 30 days past due, are considered to have a low credit risk. The provision for credit losses for these financial assets is based on a 12-month ECL. The low credit risk exemption has been applied on debt investments that meet the investment grade criteria of the PLDT Group. Determination of functional currency The functional currencies of the entities under the PLDT Group are the currency of the primary economic environment in which each entity operates. It is the currency that mainly influences the revenue from and cost of rendering products and services. The presentation currency of the PLDT Group is the Philippine Peso. Based on the economic substance of the underlying circumstances relevant to the PLDT Group, the functional currency of all entities under the PLDT Group is the Philippine Peso, except for (a) FECL Group, PLDT Global and certain of its subsidiaries, PGNL and certain of its subsidiaries, Chikka and certain of its subsidiaries and PGIC, which use the U.S. Dollar; (b) iCommerce, CPL and AGSPL, which use the Singaporean Dollar; (c) AGS Indonesia, which uses the Indonesian Rupiah; and (d) PLDT Malaysia Sdn Bhd, which use the Malaysian Ringgit. Determining the lease term of contracts with renewal and termination options – Company as a Lessee Upon adoption of IFRS 16, we applied a single recognition and measurement approach for all leases, except for short-term leases and leases of ‘low-value’ assets. See Section Leases for the accounting policy. We determine the lease term as the non-cancellable term of the lease, together with any periods covered by an option to extend the lease if it is reasonably certain to be exercised, or any periods covered by an option to terminate the lease, if it is reasonably certain not to be exercised. We, as the lessee, have the option, under some of our lease agreements to lease the assets for additional terms. We apply judgment in evaluating whether it is reasonably certain to exercise the option to renew. That is, we consider all relevant factors that create an economic incentive for us to exercise the renewal. After the commencement date, we reassess the lease term if there is a significant event or change in circumstances that is within our control and affects our ability to exercise or not to exercise the option to renew or to terminate (e.g., a change in business strategy). We included the renewal period as part of the lease term for leases such as poles and leased circuits due to the significance of these assets to our operations. These leases have a non-cancellable period (i.e., one to 30 years) and there will be a significant negative effect on our provision of services if a replacement is not readily available. Furthermore, the periods covered by termination options are included as part of these lease term only when they are reasonably certain not to be exercised. See Note 10 – Leases for information on potential future payments relating to periods following the exercise date of extension and termination options that are not included in the lease term. Total depreciation of ROU assets amounted to Php 5,716 million, Php 5,388 million and Php 4,940 million for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively. Total lease liabilities amounted to Php 42,435 million and Php 21,686 million as at December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively. See Note 10 – Leases and Note 28 – Financial Assets and Liabilities. Sale and Leaseback of Telecom Towers The accounting for sale and leaseback transaction depends on whether the transfer of the asset qualifies as a sale. We applied judgment to determine whether the transfer of asset is accounted for as a sale based on the requirements for determining when a performance obligation is satisfied in IFRS 15. We also applied estimates and judgment in determining many aspects, among others, the passive telecom assets and land lease as unit of accounts, the fair value of the towers sold, the measurement of the ROU assets retained by us and determining an appropriate discount rate to calculate the present value of the minimum lease payments. Assets classified as held-for-sale The criteria for held-for-sale classification is regarded as met only when the sale is highly probable, and the asset is available for immediate sale in its present condition. Actions required to complete the sale should indicate that it is unlikely that significant changes to the sale will be made or that the decision to sell will be withdrawn. Smart and DMPI entered into sale and purchase agreements with certain tower companies in connection with the sale of telecom towers and related passive telecom infrastructure. The closing of the agreements will be on a staggered basis depending on the satisfaction of closing conditions based on the number of towers transferred and is expected to be completed in 2023. With this agreement, we believe that certain conditions were met that qualified the related assets to be reclassified as held-for-sale. Accounting for investments in MediaQuest Holdings, Inc., or MediaQuest, through Philippine Depositary Receipts, or PDRs ePLDT made various investments in PDRs issued by MediaQuest in relation to its direct interest in Satventures, Inc., or Satventures, and indirect interest in Cignal TV, Inc., or Cignal TV. Based on our judgment, at the PLDT Group level, ePLDT’s investments in PDRs gives ePLDT a significant influence over Satventures and Cignal TV as evidenced by provision of essential technical information and material transactions among PLDT, Smart, Satventures and Cignal TV, and thus are accounted for as investments in associates using the equity method. See related discussion on Note 11 – Investments in Associates and Joint Ventures – Investments in Associates – Investment of ePLDT in MediaQuest PDRs. Accounting for investment of PCEV in Maya Bank, Inc., or Maya Bank The shareholders’ agreement of Voyager Finserve Corporation, or VFC, and Paymaya Finserve Corporation, or PFC, (collectively known as the Bank Holdcos) requires affirmative vote of at least one director nominated by both PCEV and VIH to direct the relevant activities of the Bank HoldCos. The Bank HoldCos were incorporated for the sole purpose of holding shares or equity investments in Maya Bank. Because of the contractual arrangement between the parties, the investments in the Bank HoldCos are accounted as joint venture. See Note 11 – Investments in Associates and Joint Ventures – Investments in Associates – Investment of PCEV in Maya Bank. Assessment of loss of control over PG1 PLDT assesses the consequences of changes in the ownership interest in a subsidiary that may result in a loss of control as well as the consequence of losing control of a subsidiary during the reporting period. Whether or not PLDT retains control over the subsidiary depends on an evaluation of a number of factors that indicate if there are changes to one or more of the three elements of control. When PLDT has less than majority of the voting rights or similar rights to an investee, the Company considers all relevant facts and circumstances in assessing whether it has power over an investee, including, among others, representation on its board of directors, voting rights, and other rights of other investors, including their participation in significant decisions made in the ordinary course of business. As a result of the acquired equity interest of Philex Mining Corporation, MPIC, and Roxas Holdings, Inc. in PG1, PLDT’s ownership interest was diluted to 47.6%. In addition, PG1 appointed a new director bringing the total number of PG1 directors to nine. PLDT retained four out of nine total board seats. Consequently, as at February 28, 2022, PLDT lost its control over PG1 and accounted for its remaining interest as investment in associate. See Note 11 – Investments in Associates and Joint Ventures – Investments in Associates – Investment of PLDT in PG1. As at December 31, 2022 and 2021, PLDT holds 47.6% and 65.3% interest over PG1, respectively. Accounting for investments in Vega Telecom Inc., or VTI, Bow Arken Holdings Company, or Bow Arken, and Brightshare Holdings, Inc., or Brightshare On May 30, 2016, PLDT acquired a 50% equity interest in each of VTI, Bow Arken and Brightshare. See related discussion on Note 11 – Investments in Associates and Joint Ventures – Investments in Joint Ventures. Based on the Memorandum of Agreement, PLDT and Globe Telecom, Inc., or Globe, each has the right to appoint half the members of the Board of Directors of each of VTI, Bow Arken and Brightshare, as well as the (i) co-Chairman of the Board; (ii) co-Chief Executive Officer and President; and (iii) co-Controller where any matter requiring their approval shall be deemed passed or approved if the consents of both co-officers holding the same position are obtained. All decisions of each Board of Directors may only be approved if at least one director nominated by each of PLDT and Globe votes in favor of it. Based on these rights, PLDT and Globe have joint control over VTI, Bow Arken and Brightshare, which is defined in IFRS 11, Joint Arrangements, as a contractually agreed sharing of control of an arrangement and exists only when decisions about the relevant activities require the unanimous consent of the parties sharing control. Consequently, PLDT and Globe classified the joint arrangement as a joint venture in accordance with IFRS 11 given that PLDT and Globe each has the right to 50% of the net assets of VTI, Bow Arken and Brightshare and their respective subsidiaries. Accordingly, PLDT accounted for the investment in VTI, Bow Arken and Brightshare using the equity method of accounting in accordance with IAS 28. Under the equity method of accounting, the investment is initially recognized at cost and adjusted thereafter for the post-acquisition change in the investor’s share of the investee’s net assets. See Note 11 – Investments in Associates and Joint Ventures – Investment in Joint Ventures – Investments of PLDT in VTI, Bow Arken and Brightshare. Material partly-owned subsidiaries Our consolidated financial statements include additional information about subsidiaries that have non-controlling interest, or NCI, that are material to us, see Note 6 – Components of Other Comprehensive Loss. We determined material partly-owned subsidiaries as those with balance of NCI greater than 5% of the total equity as at December 31, 2022 and 2021. Material associates and joint ventures Our consolidated financial statements include additional information about associates and joint ventures that are material to us. See Note 11 – Investments in Associates and Joint Ventures. We determined material associates and joint ventures are those investees where our carrying amount of investments is greater than 5% of the total investments in associates and joint ventures as at December 31, 2022 and 2021. Determining Taxable Profit, Tax Bases, Unused Tax Losses, Unused Tax Credits and Tax Rates We assess whether we have any uncertain tax position and applies significant judgment in identifying uncertainties over our income tax treatments. We determined based on our assessment that it is probable that our income tax treatments (including those for the subsidiaries) will be accepted by the taxation authorities. CREATE Act On March 26, 2021, the Philippine President signed into law Republic Act No. 11534, or the CREATE Act, which introduced reforms to the corporate income tax and incentives systems. It took effect 15 days after its complete publication in the Official Gazette or in a newspaper of general circulation, or on April 11, 2021. The CREATE Act provides for the following reduction in corporate income tax rates, among others: • Lower corporate income tax from 30% to 25%, retroactive to July 1, 2020, for both domestic and foreign corporations; • Lower corporate income tax of 20% for small and medium domestic corporations (with net taxable income of Php5 million and below, and with total assets of not more than Php100 million excluding land); and • Lower MCIT from 2% to 1% effective July 1, 2020 until June 30, 2023. The CREATE Act was not considered substantially enacted as at December 31, 2020 and its passage into law on March 26, 2021 is considered as a non-adjusting subsequent event for 2020. Accordingly, current and deferred taxes as at and for the year ended December 31, 2020 were computed and measured using the applicable tax rates as at December 31, 2020 (i.e. 30% RCIT / 2% MCIT) for financial reporting purposes. Under the CREATE Act, the lower regular corporate income tax rate of 25% applies retroactively to July 1, 2020. • Based on the provisions of BIR Revenue Regulations (RR) No. 05-2021 dated April 8, 2021, the applicable statutory tax rate for the calendar year ended December 31, 2020 is 27.5%. This resulted in a reduction of provision for current income tax amounting to Php 485 million, which was reflected as an adjustment in the 2020 Annual Income Tax Returns; and • Deferred income tax assets and liabilities as at December 31, 2020 are remeasured using the applicable statutory tax rate of 25% under the CREATE Act. This resulted in lower net deferred income tax assets and liabilities as at December 31, 2020 of Php 3,125 million and additional provision for deferred income tax of Php 579 million. The above adjustments in income tax provision were recognized in the first quarter of 2021. Meanwhile, the tax rates provided for under the CREATE Act were used for the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021. Estimates and Assumptions The key estimates and assumptions concerning the future and other key sources of estimation uncertainty at the end of the reporting period that have a significant risk of causing a material adjustment to the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities recognized in our consolidated financial statements within the next financial year are discussed below. We based our estimates and assumptions on parameters available when our consolidated financial statements were prepared. Existing circumstances and assumptions about future developments, however, may change due to market changes or circumstances arising beyond our control. Such changes are reflected in the assumptions when they occur. Leases – Estimating the incremental borrowing rate, or IBR In calculating the present value of lease payments, we use the IBR at the lease commencement date if the interest rate implicit in the lease is not readily determinable. IBR is the rate of interest that a lessee would have to pay to borrow over a similar term, similar security, the funds necessary to obtain an asset of a similar value to the ROU asset in a similar economic environment. We use benchmark rates from partner banks based on the tenor of our loan borrowings plus a spread adjustment based on our credit worthiness. Our lease liabilities amounted to Php 42,435 million and Php 21,686 million as at December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively. See Note 10 – Leases. Loss of control over VIH – Fair value measurement of interest retained A deemed disposal occurs where the proportionate interest of PLDT in a subsidiary is reduced other than by an actual disposal, for example, by the issuance of shares to a third-party investor by the subsidiary. When PLDT no longer has control, the remaining interest is measured at fair value as at the date the control was lost. In determining the fair value of PLDT’s retained interest in VIH, we take into account recent transactions and all the facts and circumstances surrounding the transactions such as timing, transaction size, transaction frequency, and motivations of the investors. We carefully assess the accounting implications of the stipulation in the shareholders’ agreements and consider whether such a transaction has been made at arm’s length. See Note 11 – Investments in Associates and Joint Ventures – Investments in Associates – Investment of PCEV in VIH. Impairment of non-financial assets IFRS requires that an impairment review be performed when certain impairment indicators are present. In the case of goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite useful life, at a minimum, such assets are subject to an impairment test annually and whenever there is an indication that such assets may be impaired. This requires an estimation of the VIU of the CGUs to which these assets are allocated. The VIU calculation requires us to make an estimate of the expected future cash flows from the CGU and to choose a suitable discount rate in order to calculate the present value of those cash flows. See Note 15 – Goodwill and Intangible Assets – Impairment Testing of Goodwill for the key assumptions used to determine the VIU of the relevant CGUs. Determining the recoverable amount of property and equipment, ROU assets, investments in associates and joint ventures, goodwill and intangible assets, prepayments and other noncurrent assets, requires us to make estimates and assumptions in the determination of future cash flows expected to be generated from the continued use and ultimate disposition of such assets. Future events could cause us to conclude that property and equipment, ROU assets, investments in associates and joint ventures, intangible assets and other noncurrent assets associated with an acquired business are impaired. Any resulting impairment loss could have a material adverse impact on our financial position and financial performance. The preparation of estimated future cash flows involves significant estimations and assumptions of future market conditions. While we believe that our assumptions are appropriate and reasonable, significant changes in our assumptions may materially affect our assessment of recoverable values and may lead to future impairment charges under IFRS. See Note 4 – Operating Segment Information, Note 5 – Income and Expenses – Asset Impairment, and Note 9 – Property and Equipment. The carrying values of our property and equipment, ROU assets, investments in associates and joint ventures, investment properties, goodwill and intangible assets, and prepayments are separately disclosed in Note 9 – Property and Equipment, Note 10 – Leases, Note 11 – Investments in Associates and Joint Ventures, Note 14 – Investment Properties, Note 15 – Goodwill and Intangible Assets and Note 19 – Prepayments, respectively. Estimating useful lives of property and equipment We estimate the useful lives of each item of our property and equipment based on the periods over which our assets are expected to be available for use. Our estimation of the useful lives of our property and equipment is also based on our collective assessment of industry practice, internal technical evaluation and experience with similar assets. The estimated useful lives of each assets are reviewed every year-end and updated if expectations differ from previous estimates due to physical wear and tear, technical or commercial obsolescence and legal or other limitations on the use of our assets. It is possible, however, that future results of operations could be materially affected by changes in our estimates brought about by changes in the factors mentioned above. The amounts and timing of recorded expenses for any period would be affected by changes in these factors and circumstances. A reduction in the estimated useful lives of our property and equipment would increase our recorded depreciation and decrease the carrying amount of our property and equipment. In 2019, Smart shortened its estimated useful lives of certain network, technology and other equipment, the most significant of which were the 2G technology-related equipment in preparation for the shutdown of said technology. The shutdown was part of our strategy to address increasing demand for data and data centric applications by moving to faster speed long-term evolution, or LTE, and 5G technologies. As a result, Smart recognized additional depreciation expense of Php 87 million, Php 1,397 million and Php 1,458 million for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively. In 2020, Smart shortened its estimated useful lives of certain network, technology and other equipment, the most significant of which are the 3G technology-related equipment in preparation for the shutdown of said technology. The shutdown is the next phase of our strategy to migrate to faster speed LTE and 5G technologies. Smart also shortened the estimated useful lives of certain network equipment as a result of transformation and cost re-engineering initiatives. The management re-evaluated these 3G technology-related equipment in May 2022, and it was determined that the number of 3G devices in the market continued to decline resulting to low 3G traffic. Furthermore, the demands of the subscribers are shifting to LTE and 5G which offers faster high-speed data services. The remaining number of the 3G subscribers are negligible and will not result to further re-assessment of the EUL for the 3G technology assets were fully written down. As a result, Smart recognized additional depreciation expense of Php 9,421 million, Php 1,406 million and Php 3,035 million for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively. In 2020, PLDT shortened its estimated useful lives of certain network equipment resulting from the Asymmetric Digital Subscriber Line migration projects from copper to fiber-to-the home to improve better quality of service for its existing broadband subscribers and address the growing demand for higher internet speed brought about by work from home and online classes. As a result, PLDT recognized additional depreciation expense of Php 1,028 million for the year ended December 31, 2020. In 2021, Smart accelerated the depreciation of certain equipment as a result of its Technology Group initiatives such as IT and Tech refresh programs, core modernization and support replacements. As a result, Smart recognized additional depreciation expense of Php 1,138 million in the fourth quarter of 2021. In 2022, Smart conducted an enterprise-wide network asset physical verification activity wherein certain assets have been identified, which are expected not to utilized moving forward and will have to be decomponetized and possible to be dismantled. As a result, Smart recognized additional depreciation expense of Php 3,044 million. In 2022, certain softwares and related services were upgraded as a result of IT system updates for the data link repository program of the data transformation. These replaced software and services that are to expire in 2023 to support various projects like e-load, rating and charging Online Charging System, System Application Products, value-added services and software and services related to Trident. As a result, we recognized additional depreciation expense of Php 2,122 million. In 2022, PLDT embarked on the re-development of its Makati Offices to transform both Ramon Cojuangco Building and Makati General Office into a modern, ecologically sustainable, and open campus-type headquarters. Part of the renovation is the moveout and modernization of network equipment. As a result, PLDT and Smart recognized additional depreciation expense of Php 1,798 million and Php 46 million, respectively, in the second quarter of 2022. In addition, PLDT accelerated the depreciation of certain network equipment as a result of technology transformation and modernization program to continuously enable the delivery and fulfillment of more advanced, more resilient and much more intelligent network to provide best quality of customer experience and continuously meet the intensified demands on infrastructure and is expected to grow exponentially in the future. The following are the 2022 PLDT initiatives: • PLDT have stopped selling copper facilities to subscribes and stopped investing on infrastructure to Vectored Very High-Speed Digital Subscribers, or VVDSL, and migrating to Fiber Optic facilities as new offering to new subscribers. As a result, PLDT recognized additional depreciation expense amounting to Php 9,711 million in 2022. • PLDT continued network upgrades, and fortification of fiber optic cables to utilize better physical routes to increase the reach, capacity and network compatibility with higher bandwidth transport equipment by replacing the old existing aerial and underground fiber cables that are no longer viable as they cannot deliver and meet service requirements for our subscribers. As a result, PLDT recognized additional depreciation expense amounting to Php 3,215 million in 2022. • PLDT replaced the legacy Optical Line Terminal, or OLT, which delivers internet connectivity to our subscriber with OLT that has more advanced and much higher capacity fiber access equipment. As a result, PLDT recognized additional depreciation expense amounting to Php 786 million in 2022. • Both PLDT and Smart carried out the modernization of some key core network equipment and facilities through significant upgrades and expansion of hardware for more flexibility and better equipped for other functionalities. As a result, PLDT and Smart recognized additional depreciation expenses amounting to Php 525 million and Php 1,334 million, respectively, in 2022. • Furthermore, both PLDT and Smart laid out the Transport Network Transformation, a new system ready to serve the traffic of existing and incoming subscribers of fixed and wireless business with enhanced reliability, footprint and operational simplicity. This replaced the legacy network system that resulted in PLDT and Smart recognizing additional depreciation expenses amounting to Php 14,128 million and Php 5,074 million, respectively, in 2022. The total depreciation and amortization of property and equipment amounted to Php 92,998 million, Php 46,781 million and Php 42,540 million for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively. Total carrying values of property and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation and amortization, amounted to Php 292,745 million and Php 302,736 million as at December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively. See Note 4 – Operating Segment Information and Note 9 – Property and Equipment. Estimating useful lives of intangible assets with finite lives Intangible assets with finite lives are amortized over their expected useful lives using the straight-line method of amortization. At a minimum, the amortization period and the amortization method for an intangible asset with a finite useful life are reviewed at least at each financial year-end. Changes in the expected useful life or the expected pattern of consumption of future economic benefits embodied in the asset are accounted for by changing the amortization period or method, as appropriate, and treated as changes in accounting estimates. The amortization expense on intangible assets with finite lives is recognized in our consolidated income statements. In October 2020, we implemented the rebranding of Sun Prepaid into Smart Prepaid. As a result, the “Sun Cellular” trademark of DMPI which had been previously projected to be of continued use and accordingly estimated to have an indefinite life was subsequently treated as having a finite life and was amortized over a period of 12 months starting August 2020. See Note 2 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies – Sun Prepaid Rebranding to Smart Prepaid and Note 15 – Goodwill and Intangible Assets – Amortization of Sun Cellular Trademark. The total amortization of intangible assets with finite lives amounted to Php 228 million, Php 2,822 million and Php 2,496 million for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively. Total carrying values of intangible assets with finite lives amounted to Php 1,388 million and Php 1,156 million as at December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively. See Note 4 – Operating Segment Information, Note 5 – Income and Expenses – Selling, General and Administrative Expenses and Note 15 – Goodwill and Intangible Assets. Investment Properties We carry our investment properties at fair value, with changes in fair value being recognized in the consolidated income statement. Investment properties have been determined based on appraisal performed by an independent firm of appraisers, an industry specialist in valuing these types of investment properties. The valuation for land was based on a market approach valuation technique while the valuation for building and land improvements was based on a cost approach valuation technique using current material and labor costs for improvements based on external and independent reviewers. See Note 14 – Investment Properties. Recognition of deferred income tax assets We review the carrying amounts of deferred income tax assets at the end of each reporting period and reduce these to the extent that these are no longer probable that sufficient taxable income will be available to allow all or part of the deferred income tax assets to be utilized. Our assessment on the recognition of deferred income tax assets on deductible temporary differences is based on the level and timing of forecasted taxable income of the subsequent reporting years. This forecast is based on our past results and future expectations on revenues and expenses as well as future tax planning strategies. Based on this, management expects that we will generate sufficient taxable income to allow all or part of our deferred income tax assets to be utilized. Based on the above assessment, our consolidated unrecognized deferred income tax assets amounted to Php 748 million and Php 901 million as at December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively. Total consolidated benefit from deferred income tax amounted to Php 4,175 million for the year ended December 31, 2022, while total consolidated provision for deferred income tax amounted to Php 2,348 million and Php 3,989 million for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively. Total consolidated recognized net deferred income tax assets amounted to Php 17,636 million and Php 13,385 million as at December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively. See Note 4 – Operating Segment Information and Note 7 – Income Taxes. Estimating allowance for ECLs a. Measurement of ECLs ECLs are derived from unbiased and probability-weighted estimates of expected loss, and are measured as follows: • Financial assets that are not credit-impaired at the reporting date: as the present value of all cash shortfalls over the expected life of the financial asset discounted by the EIR. The cash shortfall is the difference between the cash flows due to us in accordance with the contract and the cash flows that we expect to receive; and • Financial assets that are credit-impaired at the reporting date: as the difference between the gross carrying amount and the present value of estimated future cash flows discounted by the EIR. We leverage existing risk management indicators (e.g. internal credit risk classification and restructuring triggers), credit risk rating changes and reasonable and supportable information which allow us to identify whether the credit risk of financial assets has significantly increased. b. Inputs, assumptions and estimation techniques • General approach for cash in bank, short-term investments, debt securities, financial assets at FVOCI and advances and other noncurrent assets The ECL is measured on either a 12-month or lifetime basis depending on whether a significant increase in credit risk has occurred since initial recognition. We consider the probability of our counterparty to default its obligation and the expected loss at default after considering the effects of collateral, any potential value when realized and time value of money. We consider the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the operations and financial standing of the counterparties during our assessment on significant increase in credit risk. Based on our assessment, there is no significant increase in credit risk and the ECL for these financial assets under general approach are measured on a 12-month basis. The assumptions underlying the ECL calculation are monitored and reviewed on a quarterly basis. • Simplified approach for trade and other receivables and contract assets The simplified approach does not require the tracking of changes in credit risk, but instead requires the recognition of lifetime ECL. For trade receivables and contract assets, we use the simplified approach for calculating ECL. We have considered similarities in underlying credit risk characteristics and behavior in determining the groupings of various customer segments. We used historically observed default rates and adjusted these historical credit loss experience with forward-looking information. At every reporting date, the historical default rates are updated and changes in the forward-looking estimates are analyzed. There have been no significant changes in the estimation techniques used for calculating ECL on trade and other receivables and contract assets. • Incorporation of forward-looking information We incorporated forward-looking information into both our assessment of whether the credit risk of an instrument has increased significantly since its initial recognition and our measurement of ECL. To do this, management considered a range of relevant forward-looking macro-economic assumptions and probability weights for the determination of unbiased general industry adjustments and any related specific industry adjustments that support the calculation of ECLs. The macro-economic factors are aligned with information used by us for other purposes such as strategic planning and budgeting. The probability weights used in the calculation of ECLs cover a range of possible outcomes and consider the severity of the impact of COVID-19 and the expected timing/duration of the recovery from the pandemic. We have identified and documented key drivers of credit risk and credit losses of each portfolio of financial instruments and, using an analysis of historical data, has estimated relationships between macro-economic variables and credit risk and credit losses. Predicted relationship between the key indicators and default and loss rates on various portfolios of financial assets have been developed based on analyzing historical data over the past three to eight years. The methodologies and assumptions including any forecasts of future economic conditions are reviewed regularly. We have not identified any uncertain event that it has assessed to be relevant to the risk of default occurring but where we are not able to estimate the impact on ECL due to lack of reasonable and supportable information. Total provision for expected credit losses for trade and other receivables amounted to Php 5,156 million, Php 3,737 million and Php 6,446 million for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively. Trade and other receivables, net of allowance for expected credit losses, amounted to Php 26,255 million and Php 21,790 million as at December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively. See Note 5 – Income and Expenses and Note 17 – Trade and Other Receivables. Total impairment losses for contract assets amounted to Php 227 million, Php 253 million and Php 266 million for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively. Contract assets, net of allowance for expected credit losses, amounted to Php 2,233 million and Php 2,251 million as at December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively. See Note 5 – Income and Expenses – Contract Balances. • Grouping of instruments for losses measured on collective basis A broad range of forward-looking information were considered as economic inputs such as the gross domestic product, or GDP, inflation rate, unemployment rates, export rates, G20 GDP and G20 inflation rates. For expected credit loss provisions modelled on a collective basis, grouping of exposures is performed on the basis of shared risk characteristics, such that risk exposures within a group are homogeneous. In performing this grouping, there must be sufficient information for the PLDT Group to be statistically acceptable. Where sufficient information is not available internally, then we have considered benchmarking internal/external supplementary data to use for modelling purposes. The characteristics and any supplementary data used to determine groupings are outlined below. Trade receivables – Groupings for collective measurement a. Retail subscribers; b. Corporate subscribers; c. Foreign administrations and domestic carriers; and d. Dealers, agents and others The following credit exposures are assessed individually: • All stage 3 assets, regardless of the class of financial assets; and • The cash and cash equivalents, investment in debt securities and financial assets at FVOCI, and other financial assets. Estimating pension benefit costs and other employee benefits The cost of defined benefit and present value of the pension obligation are determined using the projected unit credit method. An actuarial valuation includes making various assumptions which consists, among other things, discount rates, rates of compensation increases and mortality rates. Further, our accrued benefit cost is affected by the fair value of the plan assets. Key assumptions used to estimate fair value of the unlisted equity investments included in the plan assets consist of revenue growth rate, direct costs, capital expenditures, discount rates and terminal growth rates. See Note 26 – Pension and Other Employee Benefits. Due to complexity of valuation, the underlying assumptions and its long-term nature, a defined benefit obligation is highly sensitive to changes in assumptions. While we believe that our assumptions are reasonable and appropriate, significant differences in our actual experience or significant changes in our assumptions may materially affect our cost for pension and other retirement obligations. All assumptions are reviewed every year-end. Net consolidated pension benefit costs amounted to Php 1,749 million, Php 2,213 million and Php 2,218 million for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively. The prepaid benefit costs amounted to Php 1,598 million and Php 1,018 million as at December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively. The accrued benefit costs amounted to Php 1,745 million and Php 7,760 million as at December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively. See Note 5 – Income and Expenses – Compensation and Employee Benefits, Note 19 – Prepayments and Note 26 – Pension and Other Employee Benefits. TIP In 2017, the Board of Directors of PLDT approved the TIP which intended to provide incentive compensation to key officers, executives and other eligible participants who are consistent performers and contributors to the Company’s strategic and financial goals, based on the achievement of telco core income targets. The program was divided into two cycles. Cycle 1 covered the performance period from 2017 to 2019, was in the form of PLDT common shares of stocks and later modified to a mix of equity shares and cash grants, and was released in three annual grants. Cycle 2 covered the performance period from 2020 to 2021, was settled in cash and was released in 2022. TIP was administered by the ECC. LTIP On December 23, 2021, the ECC approved the LTIP covering the years 2022 to 2026, covering two cycles, based on the achievement of telco core income targets, with additional performance metrics on Customer Experience and Sustainability to impact the LTIP pay-out. Cycle 1 covers performance period from 2022 to 2024. Payout will be split at the end of the 2nd year and at the end of the 3rd year, based on the achievement of performance targets. Cycle 2 covers performance period from 2025 and 2026, and is subject to the ECC’s further evaluation and approval of the final of the terms. This other long-term employee benefit liability was recognized and measured using the projected unit credit method and was amortized on a straight-line basis over the vesting period. The expense accrued for the LTIP amounted to Php 1,272 million for the year ended December 31, 2022 and the expense accrued for TIP amounted to Php 1,186 million and Php 1,134 million for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively. The accrued incentive payable amounted to Php 1,294 million and Php 2,384 million as at December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively. See Note 5 – Income and Expenses – Compensation and Employee Benefits and Note 26 – Pension and Other Employee Benefits – Other Long-term Employee Benefits. Provision for asset retirement obligations Provision for asset retirement obligations is recognized in the period in which this is incurred if a reasonable estimate can be made. This requires an estimation of the cost to restore or dismantle on a per square meter basis, depending on the location, and is based on the best estimate of the expenditure required to settle the obligation at the future restoration or dismantlement date, discounted using a pre-tax rate that reflects the current market assessment of the time value of money and, where appropriate, the risk specific to the liability. Total provision for asset retirement obligations amounted to Php 1,514 million and Php 2,121 million as at December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively. See Note 22 – Deferred Credits and Other Noncurrent Liabilities. Provision for legal contingencies and tax assessments We are currently involved in various legal proceedings and tax assessments. Our estimates of the probable costs for the resolution of these claims have been developed in consultation with our counsel handling the defense in these matters and are based upon our analysis of potential results. We currently do not believe these proceedings could materially reduce our revenues and profitability. It is possible, however, that future financial position and performance could be materially affected by changes in our estimates or effectiveness of our strategies relating to these proceedings and assessments. See Note 27 – Provisions and Contingencies. Based on management’s assessment, appropriate provisions were made; however, management has decided not to disclose further details of these provisions as they may prejudice our position in certain legal proceedings. Determination of fair values of financial assets and financial liabilities When the fair value of financial assets and financial liabilities recorded in our consolidated statements of financial position cannot be measured based on quoted prices in active markets, their fair value is measured using valuation techniques including the discounted cash flows model. The inputs to these models are taken from observable markets where possible, but where this is not feasible, a degree of judgment is required in establishing fair values. The judgments include considerations of inputs such as liquidity risk, credit risk and volatility. Changes in assumptions about these factors could affect the reported fair value of financial instruments. Other than those whose carrying amounts are reasonable approximations of fair values, total fair values of noncurrent financial assets and noncurrent financial liabilities as at December 31, 2022 amounted to Php 3,851 million and Php 203,459 million, respectively, while the total fair values of noncurrent financial assets and noncurrent financial liabilities as at December 31, 2021 amounted to Php 3,067 million and Php 244,568 million, respectively. See Note 28 – Financial Assets and Liabilities.

X
- Definition The disclosure of judgements that management has made in the process of applying the entity's accounting policies that have the most significant effect on amounts recognised in the financial statements along with information about the assumptions that the entity makes about the future, and other major sources of estimation uncertainty at the end of the reporting period, that have a significant risk of resulting in a material adjustment to the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities within the next year. [Refer: Carrying amount [member]] + References Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2009/role/commonPracticeRef -Name IAS -Number 1 -IssueDate 2022-03-24 -Paragraph 10 -Subparagraph e -URI https://taxonomy.ifrs.org/xifrs-link?type=IAS&num=1&code=ifrs-tx-2022-en-r&anchor=para_10_e&doctype=Standard -URIDate 2022-03-24 + Details
Name: | ifrs-full_DisclosureOfAccountingJudgementsAndEstimatesExplanatory
Namespace Prefix: | ifrs-full_
Data Type: | dtr-types:textBlockItemType
Balance Type: | na
Period Type: | duration

X
- Definition Managements Use Of Accounting Judgments Estimates And Assumptions [Abstract]. + References No definition available. + Details
Name: | phi_ManagementsUseOfAccountingJudgmentsEstimatesAndAssumptionsAbstract
Namespace Prefix: | phi_
Data Type: | xbrli:stringItemType
Balance Type: | na
Period Type: | duration