XML 26 R23.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.20.1
REGULATORY FRAMEWORK
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2019
REGULATORY FRAMEWORK [Abstract]  
REGULATORY FRAMEWORK
17.
REGULATORY FRAMEWORK
 
a)
General framework of the natural gas transportation segment:
 
General aspects
 
Regarding TGS’ Natural Gas Transportation business, it is regulated by Law No. 24,076 (“the Natural Gas Act”), its regulatory Decree No. 1,738/92 and the Regulatory framework for the transportation and distribution of natural gas in Argentina. The Natural Gas Act created ENARGAS, which is entitled, among other things, to set the basis for the calculation, monitoring, approval of tariffs and the power to verify compliance with the Natural Gas Law and its regulations. On January 28, 2016, Resolution No. 7 of the MINEM of Argentina repealed the Resolution 2000/2005 of the former Ministry of MPFIPyS which provided that all tariff increases should have the prior intervention of the Undersecretary of Coordination and Management Control.
 
TGS License has been granted for an original period of 35 years beginning on December 28, 1992. However, the Natural Gas Act provides that TGS may apply to ENARGAS for a renewal of its license for an additional period of ten years. ENARGAS should evaluate at that time the performance of TGS and raise a recommendation to the Executive Branch. At the end of the period of validity of the license, 35 or 45, as appropriate, the Natural Gas Act requires a call for a new tender for the granting of a new license, in which TGS, provided the Company fulfilled substantially with the obligations resulting from the license, would have the option of matching the best offer that the Government received in this bidding process.
 
Tariff situation
 
Prior the enactment of the Public Emergency Law, and according to the Regulatory Framework, transportation tariffs were to be calculated in US dollars and converted into Argentine pesos at the time the customer was billed using the exchange rate prevailing at the date of the billing. The basic natural gas transportation tariffs charged by TGS had been established at the time of the privatization of GdE and were to be adjusted, subject to prior authorization, in the following cases: (i) semiannually to reflect changes in the US producer price index (“PPI”) and (ii) every five years according to efficiency and investment factors determined by ENARGAS. The “efficiency factor” was a reduction to the base tariff resulting from future efficiency programs while the “investment factor” increased the tariffs to compensate the licensees for future investments which were not repaid through tariffs. Also, subject to ENARGAS approval, tariffs were to be adjusted to reflect non-recurrent circumstances or tax changes, other than income tax.
 
The terms and conditions as described in the precedent paragraph in connection with tariff adjustments contemplated within the Regulatory Framework are no longer effective since the enactment of the Public Emergency Law in early 2002, which, among other provisions, eliminated tariff increases based on US dollar exchange rate fluctuations, foreign price indexes or any other indexing procedure and established a conversion rate of one peso to one US dollar for tariffs. The Public Emergency Law also granted the Executive Branch power to renegotiate contracts entered into with private utility companies, pursuant to the framework included in such law as long as it is in force, which expired on December 31, 2017, after several extensions.
 
Between July 2003 and March 2018, the Company received a series of temporary tariff increases under the framework of the Integral Tariff Review (“RTI” for its acronym in Spanish) process initiated after the Public Emergency Law was passed.
 
On March 27, 2018, the Executive Branch of the Argentine Government issued the Decree No. 250/2018 (the “Decree 250”) ratifying the 2017 Integral Agreement. This decree represents the conclusion of the RTI process and the completion of the 2017 Transitional Agreement, and thus, the final renegotiation of the license after seventeen years of negotiations.
 
The 2017 Integral Agreement sets the guidelines for the provision of the natural gas transportation service until the end of the License. Among these guidelines:
 

The RTI Process, which will culminate in the signing of the integral agreement, was approved. As a result of this RTI, a new tariff schedule was also approved. This new tariff schedule applicable to the Company determined a total tariff increase of 214.2% and 37%, in the event that it had been granted in a single installment as of April 1, 2017, on the tariff of the natural gas transportation service and the CAU, respectively.
 

The Five-Year Investment Plan was approved. Resolution 4362 obliged TGS for the execution of the Five-Year Plan, which requires a high level of essential investments for the operation and maintenance of the pipeline system, to provide quality, safe and reliable service. The Five-Year Plan shall be for the period from April 1, 2017 to March 31, 2022 and will amount to Ps. 6,786,543,expressed in December 31, 2016 currency terms.
 

A non-automatic six-month adjustment mechanism for the natural gas transportation tariff and the investment commitments were approved. This adjustment must be approved by ENARGAS and for its calculation, the evolution of the WPI published by INDEC will be considered.
 

TGS and its shareholders must withdraw any claim against the Government related to the natural gas transportation business, including the arbitration proceedings before the ICSID. The Company desisted from it on June 26, 2018.
 
As it is mentioned above the tariff increase was granted in 3 installments according to the following resolutions:
 

Effective as of April 1, 2017, 64.2% of the tariff for the natural gas transport service, the CAU not being adjusted, in accordance with the provisions of Resolution No. 4362/2017 (“Resolution 4362”).
 

Effective as of December 1, 2017, after the issuance of Resolution 120, 81.1% on the tariff for the natural gas transport service and 29.7% on the CAU, which includes the first adjustment by WPI.
 

Effective as of April 1, 2018, an increase of 50% over the tariff for the natural gas transport service and the CAU within the framework of the provisions of Resolution No. 310/2018 issued by ENARGAS.
 
Semiannual tariff increase
 
This increase is granted within the framework of the semi-annual tariff adjustment of the natural gas transportation service in accordance with the provisions of the RTI process.
 
In the public hearing held on September 4, 2018, in which the Company requested, based on the variation of the WPI recorded for the period February - August 2018, a tariff increase of approximately 30%. Considering the hearing, on September 27, 2018, ENARGAS issued Resolution No. 265/2018 which determined a 19.7% tariff increase effective as of October 1, 2018.
 
This increase was determined by ENARGAS based on the simple average of the WPI, the Construction Cost Index for the period February and August 2018 and the Salary Variation Index between December 2017 and June 2018.
 
It is noteworthy that ENARGAS supported the determination of the aforementioned tariff increase in the provisions of Resolution 4362, which, among other issues, provided that under certain circumstances and macroeconomic conditions, such as the significant devaluation occurred after April 2018, ENARGAS may use other indexes than the WPI to determine the tariff increase. TGS notified ENARGAS its disagreement with respect to the methodology for calculating the semi-annual adjustment.
 
On March 29, 2019, ENARGAS issued Resolution No. 192/2019 (“Resolution 192”) that approved, effective as of April 1, 2019, a 26% increase in the tariff chart applicable to the public service of natural gas transportation by TGS in force as of March 31, 2019.
 
In accordance with current regulations, ENARGAS has considered the evolution of the wholesale price index update index (“WPI”) between the months of August 2018 and February 2019, in order to define the semi-annual adjustments applicable to TGS tariffs.
 
Regarding the semi-annual tariff adjustment that was to be enforced as from October 1, 2019, on September 3, 2019, the SE issued Resolution No. 521/2019 (“Resolution 521”) postponing it to February 1, 2020.
 
The deferral also meant that the Company reviewed and fit, in equal proportion to the revenue that is no longer received, the execution of the Five-Year Investment Plan. As of the date of the issuance of these Consolidated Financial Statements, TGS made the proposal to ENARGAS and the corresponding approval resolution have not yet been issued.
 
Nevertheless, the Solidarity Law establishes that natural gas transportation and distribution tariffs will remain unadjusted for a maximum period of 180 days from December 23, 2019. In this sense, the Executive Branch is authorized to renegotiate them, either within the framework of the current RTI or through an extraordinary review in accordance with the provisions of the Natural Gas Law.
 
At the date of issuance of these financial statements, the administrative steps to normalize the Company’s tariff situation have not occurred.
 
Additionally, the Solidarity Law provides for the administrative intervention of ENARGAS.
 
Deferral of collections
 
On June 21, 2019, the Secretary of Energy issued Resolution N° 336/2019, which ordered the deferral of payment of 22% of the invoices issued between July 1, 2019 and October 31, 2019 corresponding to residential natural gas users.
 
The deferrals are recovered from the invoices issued from December 1, 2019 in five consecutive monthly installments in equal amount. As compensation, the National Government will pay the licensees, as a subsidy, an economic compensation for the financial cost involved in the deferral.
 
On August 22, 2019, the SE issued Resolution No. 488/2019 establishing the procedure for the calculation to be carried out by the distribution and sub-distribution companies of natural gas of the deferral provided by Resolution 336. Likewise, this resolution instructs the Undersecretariat of Hydrocarbons and Fuels of the Secretariat of Non-renewable Resources and Fuel Market of the SE to implement the procedure by which the compensation mentioned above will be calculated and paid. As of the date of the issuance of these consolidated financial statements, the regulations for the calculation and payment methodology of the economic compensation mentioned above were not issued.
 
As of December 31, 2019, the Company has trade receivables with natural gas distribution companies for Ps. 1,206,030 for such concepts.
 
b)
General Framework for non-regulated segments
 
Domestic market
 
The Production and Commercialization of Liquids segment is not subject to regulation by ENARGAS, and as it is provided in the Transfer Agreement, is organized as a separate business unit within TGS, keeping accounting information separately. However, over recent years, the Argentine Government enacted regulations which significantly impacted on it.
 
In April 2005, the Argentine Government enacted Law No. 26,020 which sets forth the regulatory framework for the industry and commercialization of LPG. Among other things, the Law No. 26,020 creates the framework through which the Secretary of Hydrocarbon Resources (“SHR”) (formerly the Federal Energy Bureau) establishes regulations meant to cause LPG suppliers to guarantee sufficient supply of LPG in the domestic market at low prices. Law No. 26,020 creates a price regime pursuant to which the SRH periodically publish reference prices for LPG sold in the domestic market. It also sets forth LPG volumes to be sold in the domestic market.
 
On March 30, 2015, the Executive Branch issued Decree No. 470/2015, regulated by Resolution No. 49/2015 issued by the Federal Energy Bureau, which created the Programa Hogares con Garrafa (the “Households with Bottles Program”) which replaced the programs in force until that time. The Households with Bottles Program was implemented through Resolutions No. 49/2015 and No. 470/2015 issued by the Federal Energy Bureau.
 
Within the framework of the Households with Bottles Program, a maximum reference price was determined for the members of the commercialization chain in order to guarantee the supply to low-income residential users, forcing producers to supply with LPG at a certain price and at a certain quantity defined for each of them. Additionally, the payment of compensation to the participating producers of the Households with Bottles Program was established.
 
The current price of butane and propane marketed under this program, after successive modifications and according to Provision No. 104/2019 issued by the SHR and Fuels, is $ 9,895 and $ 9,656 per ton, respectively. No compensation has been set for these products.
 
In this context, the Company has filed various administrative and judicial claims challenging the general regulations of the program, as well as the administrative acts that determine the volumes of butane that must be sold in the domestic market, in order to safeguard its economic-financial situation and thus, preventing that this situation does not extend over time.
 
In addition, the Company is a party of the Propane Gas Supply Agreement for Induced Propane Gas Distribution Networks (“Propane for Networks Agreement”) entered into with the Argentine Government by which it undertakes to supply propane to the domestic market at a lower price to the market. In compensation, the Company receives an economic compensation calculated as the difference between the sales price and the export parity determined by the ex-MINEM.
 
On March 31, 2017, the MINEM issued Resolutions No. 74 and 474-E/2017 (“Resolution 474”) that stipulate increases in the price of undiluted propane gas destined to the Propane for Networks Agreement as of April 1 and December 1, 2017, respectively. From those dates onwards, the price of undiluted propane gas has been set at Ps. 1,267/ton and Ps. 2,832/ton (in accordance with Resolution 74) and Ps. 1,941.20/ton and Ps. 3,694/ton (in accordance with Resolution 474), respectively, depending on the client to whom the undiluted propane gas is delivered.
 
Finally, in May 2018, the Company signed the sixteenth extension by which the methodology for determining the price and volumes for the period April 1, 2018 - December 31, 2019 is established. Additionally, this last extension set the price for which the propane destined for this program was marketed to the client. At the date of issuance of these Financial Statements, a new agreement has not been concluded. Notwithstanding the foregoing, on January 14, 2020 TGS received the instruction issued by the Ministry of Energy to continue with propane deliveries in accordance with the conditions of the sixteenth extension of the Propane Agreement for Networks.
 
During 2019 and 2018, the Company received the amount of Ps. 468,494 and Ps. 625,678, for subsidies for the programs mentioned above, respectively.
 
As mentioned earlier, participation in the Households with Bottles Program implies economic and financial damages for the Company, because under certain circumstances the sale of the products would be carried out at prices that are below the production costs.
 
As of December 31, 2019, the Argentine Government owes the Company Ps. 143,829 for these concepts.
 
Foreign market
 
On September 3, 2018, the Executive Branch issued Decree No. 793/2018, which, between September 4, 2018 and December 31, 2020, sets an export duty of 12% on the exported amount of propane, butane and natural gasoline. This withholding is capped at $4 for each dollar of the tax base or the official FOB price.

Subsequently, on the occasion of the enactment of the Solidarity Law, an 8% cap was established for the rate applicable to hydrocarbons as of December 23, 2019.
 
Decree No. 2,067 / 08
 
Through Presidential Decree No. 2,067/08, the Executive Branch created a tariff charge to be paid by (i) the users of regulated services of transportation and / or distribution, (ii) natural gas consumers receiving natural gas directly from producers without making use of transportation systems or natural gas distribution, (iii) the natural gas processing companies in order to finance the import of natural gas. The tariff charge sets forth in this decree finance the higher price of the natural gas imports required to compensate the injection of natural gas necessary to meet national requirements (the “Charge”). When the Charge was created, TGS paid it in accordance with the provisions of Resolution I-563/2008, at Ps. 0.0492/m3.
 
The payment of the natural gas processing tariff charge was selectively subsidized from 2008 according to the destination of the natural gas. In November 2011, however, ENARGAS issued Resolution No. 1,982/11 and 1,991/11 (the “Subsidy Beneficiaries Resolutions”) which modified the list of the subsidy beneficiaries, and thus, involved a cost increase for many of our clients and for us (for certain of our consumption for our own account). The natural gas processing tariff charge increased from Ps. 0.0492 to Ps. 0.405 per cubic meter of natural gas effective from December 1, 2011, representing a significant increase in our variable costs of natural gas processing.
 
In order to avoid this damage, TGS appealed against the Presidential Decree and the Resolutions including National Government, ENARGAS and ex MPFIPyS as defendants.
 
For further information regarding the legal action filed the Company, see Note 20.b).
 
On March 28, 2016, the MINEM issued Resolution No. 28/16 (“Resolution 28”), which instructs ENARGAS to take all the necessary measures to derogate the tariff charge created by Decree No. 2,067/08 as from April 1, 2016. However, such Resolution does not repeal or declare illegitimate this decree and the Subsidy Beneficiaries Resolutions for which the judicial action is still ongoing.
 
c)
Essential assets
 
A substantial portion of the assets transferred by GdE has been defined as essential for the performance of the natural gas transportation service. Therefore, TGS is required to keep separated and maintain these assets, together with any future improvements, in accordance with certain standards defined in the License.
 
TGS may not, for any reason, dispose of, encumber, lease, sublease or loan essential assets nor use such assets for purposes other than the provision of the licensed service without ENARGAS´s prior authorization. Any expansion or improvements that it makes to the gas pipeline system may only be encumbered to secure loans that have a term of more than one year to finance such extensions or improvements.
 
Upon expiration of the License, TGS will be required to transfer to the Argentine government or its designee, the essential assets listed in an updated inventory as of the expiration date, free of any debt, encumbrances or attachments. If the Company decides not to continue with the license, TGS will receive a compensation equal to the lower of the following two amounts:
 

i)
the net book value of the essential assets determined on the basis of the price paid by the acquiring joint arrangements, and the original cost of subsequent investments carried in US dollars and adjusted by the PPI, net of accumulated depreciation according to the calculation rules to be determined by ENARGAS; or
 

ii)
the net proceeds of a new competitive bidding (the “New Bidding”).
 
Once the period of the extension of the License expires, TGS will be entitled to participate in the New Bidding, and thus, it shall be entitled to:
 

(i)
that its bid in the New Bidding be computed at an equal to the appraisal value to be determined by an investment bank selected by ENARGAS, which represents the value of the business of providing the licensed service as it is driven by the Licensee at the valuation date, as a going concern and without regard to the debts;
 

(ii)
to obtain the new License, without payment, in the event that any bid submitted in the New Bidding exceeds the appraised value;
 

(iii)
to match the best bid submitted by third parties in the New Bidding, if it would be higher than its bid mentioned in (i) paying the difference between both values to obtain the new License;
 

(iv)
if the Company is unwilling to match the best bid made by a third party, to receive the appraisal value mentioned in (i) as compensation for the transfer of the Essential Assets to the new licensee.