XML 18 R7.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT
v3.6.0.2

Basis of Presentation | 6 Months Ended
--- | ---
Dec. 31, 2016
Basis of Presentation |
Basis of Presentation | 1. Basis of Presentation Description of Business OSI Systems, Inc., together with its subsidiaries (the “Company”), is a vertically integrated designer and manufacturer of specialized electronic systems and components for critical applications. The Company sells its products in diversified markets, including homeland security, healthcare, defense and aerospace. The Company has three reporting segments: (i) Security, providing security inspection systems, turnkey security screening solutions and related services; (ii) Healthcare, providing patient monitoring, diagnostic cardiology, anesthesia and ventilation systems and defibrillators, and related services, and (iii) Optoelectronics and Manufacturing, providing specialized electronic components and electronic manufacturing services for the Security and Healthcare divisions, as well as to external original equipment manufacturer (“OEM”) customers and end users for applications in the defense, aerospace, medical and industrial markets, among others. Through its Security division, the Company provides security screening products and related services globally. These products fall into the following categories: baggage and parcel inspection; cargo and vehicle inspection; hold (checked) baggage screening; people screening; radiation detection; and explosive and narcotics trace detection. In addition to these products, the Company provides site design, installation, training and technical support services to its customers. The Company also provides turnkey security screening solutions, which can include the construction, staffing and long-term operation of security screening checkpoints for its customers. Through its Healthcare division, the Company designs, manufactures, markets and services patient monitoring, diagnostic cardiology, anesthesia delivery and ventilation systems and defibrillator products and related supplies and accessories globally. These products are used by care providers in critical care, emergency and perioperative areas in hospitals as well as physicians’ offices, medical clinics and ambulatory surgery centers, among others. The defibrillators are also used in public facilities. Through its Optoelectronics and Manufacturing division, the Company designs, manufactures and markets optoelectronic devices and provides electronics manufacturing services worldwide for use in a broad range of applications, including defense and aerospace, security and inspection systems, medical imaging and diagnostic products, telecommunications, computer peripherals, industrial automation systems, automotive diagnostic systems, gaming systems and consumer products. This division provides products and services to OEM customers and end users, as well as to the Company’s own Security and Healthcare divisions. Basis of Presentation The condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of OSI Systems, Inc. and its subsidiaries. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. The condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared by management in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) and in conjunction with the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Certain information and footnote disclosures required for annual financial statements have been condensed or excluded in accordance with SEC rules and regulations applicable to interim unaudited financial statements. Accordingly, the condensed consolidated financial statements do not include all of the information and footnotes required by GAAP for audited financial statements. In the opinion of management, the condensed consolidated financial statements reflect all adjustments of a normal and recurring nature that are considered necessary for a fair presentation of the results for the interim periods presented. These condensed consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2016. The results of operations for the three and six months ended December 31, 2016 are not necessarily indicative of the operating results to be expected for the full 2017 fiscal year or any future periods. Use of Estimates The preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of sales and costs of sales during the reporting period. The most significant of these estimates and assumptions for the Company relate to contract revenue, profit and loss recognition, fair values of assets acquired and liabilities assumed in business combinations, market values for inventories reported at lower of cost or market, stock-based compensation expense, income taxes, accrued product warranty costs, and the useful lives and valuation of recorded amounts of long-lived assets, identifiable intangible assets and goodwill. Changes in estimates are reflected in the periods during which they become known. Actual amounts will differ from these estimates, potentially by material amounts. Per Share Computations The Company computes basic earnings per share by dividing net income available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. The Company computes diluted earnings per share by dividing net income available to common stockholders by the sum of the weighted average number of common shares and dilutive potential common shares outstanding during the period. Potential common shares consist of the shares issuable upon the exercise of stock options and restricted stock or unit awards under the treasury stock method. Stock options and stock awards to purchase 0.1 million shares of common stock for the six months ended December 31, 2016 were excluded from the calculation because to include such options and awards would have been antidilutive. During the three months ended December 31, 2016, and the three months and six months ended December 31, 2015, the number of stock options and stock awards excluded from the calculation because they were antidilutive was de minimis. The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share (in thousands, except per share amounts):
|  | Three Months Ended December 31, |  | Six Months Ended December 31, |
|  | 2015 |  | 2016 |  | 2015 |  | 2016 |
Net income for diluted earnings per share calculation |  | $ | 108 |  | $ | 4,833 |  | $ | 10,913 |  | $ | 5,510 |
Weighted average shares outstanding for basic earnings per share calculation |  | 19,740 |  | 19,036 |  | 19,737 |  | 18,989 |
Dilutive effect of stock awards |  | 646 |  | 617 |  | 690 |  | 631 |
Weighted average shares outstanding for diluted earnings per share calculation |  | 20,386 |  | 19,653 |  | 20,427 |  | 19,620 |
Basic earnings per share |  | $ | 0.01 |  | $ | 0.25 |  | $ | 0.55 |  | $ | 0.29 |
Diluted earnings per share |  | $ | 0.01 |  | $ | 0.25 |  | $ | 0.53 |  | $ | 0.28 |
Cash Equivalents The Company considers all highly liquid investments with maturities of approximately three months or less as of the acquisition date to be cash equivalents. Fair Value of Financial Instruments The Company’s financial instruments consist primarily of cash, marketable securities, derivative instruments, accounts receivable, accounts payable and debt instruments. The carrying values of financial instruments, other than long-term debt instruments, are representative of their fair values due to their short-term maturities. The carrying values of the Company’s long-term debt instruments are considered to approximate their fair values because the interest rates of these instruments are variable or comparable to current rates available to the Company. Fair value is the price that would be received upon sale of an asset or paid upon transfer of a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. “Level 1” category includes assets and liabilities at the quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities. “Level 2” category includes assets and liabilities from observable inputs other than quoted market prices. “Level 3” category includes assets and liabilities whose valuation techniques are unobservable and significant to the fair value measurement. There were no assets where “Level 3” valuation techniques were used. As further discussed in Note 9 to the condensed consolidated financial statements, the Company’s contingent payment obligations related to acquisitions are measured using “Level 3” valuation techniques. Such obligations are measured at fair value on a recurring basis. The fair values of the Company’s financial assets and liabilities as of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2016 are categorized as follows (in thousands):
|  | June 30, 2016 |  | December 31, 2016 |
|  | Level 1 |  | Level 2 |  | Level 3 |  | Total |  | Level 1 |  | Level 2 |  | Level 3 |  | Total |
Assets: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Equity securities |  | $ | 354 |  | $ | — |  | $ | — |  | $ | 354 |  | $ | 330 |  | $ | — |  | — |  | $ | 330 |
Insurance company contracts |  | — |  | 21,353 |  | — |  | 21,353 |  | — |  | 24,273 |  | — |  | 24,273 |
Interest rate contract |  | — |  | (31 | ) | — |  | (31 | ) | — |  | 16 |  | — |  | 16 |
Total assets |  | $ | 354 |  | $ | 21,322 |  | $ | — |  | $ | 21,676 |  | $ | 330 |  | $ | 24,289 |  | $ | — |  | $ | 24,619 |
Liabilities — Contingent payment obligations |  | $ | — |  | $ | — |  | $ | 17,117 |  | $ | 17,117 |  | $ | — |  | $ | — |  | $ | 16,798 |  | $ | 16,798 |
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activity The Company’s use of derivatives consists of an interest rate swap agreement. The interest rate swap agreement was entered into to improve the predictability of cash flows from interest payments related to the Company’s variable, LIBOR-based term loan. The interest rate swap matures in October 2019, which aligns with the maturity of the term loan. The interest rate swap is considered an effective cash flow hedge, and, as a result, the net gains or losses from the periodic fair market revaluation of such instrument were reported as a component of Other comprehensive income (loss) in the condensed consolidated financial statements and are reclassified to interest expense when the hedge transaction settles. Property and Equipment Property and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation and amortization. Depreciation and amortization are charged while assets are used in service and are generally computed using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets taking into consideration any estimated salvage value. Amortization of leasehold improvements is calculated on the straight-line method over the shorter of the useful life of the asset or the lease term. Leased capital assets are included in property and equipment. Amortization of property and equipment under capital leases is included with depreciation expense. In the event that property and equipment are idle, as a result of excess capacity or the early termination, non-renewal or reduction in scope of a turnkey screening operation, such assets are assessed for impairment on a periodic basis. Certain fixed assets related to the Company’s turnkey security screening program in Mexico are not currently in use. As of December 31, 2016, the net value of these assets is approximately $15 million, which amount is included in property and equipment in the condensed consolidated balance sheet. Goodwill Impairment Goodwill represents the excess purchase price over the fair value of the net assets acquired in business combinations. Goodwill is allocated to the Company’s segments based on the nature of the product line of the acquired business. The carrying value of goodwill is not amortized, but is annually tested for impairment during the Company’s second quarter and more often if there is an indicator of impairment. The Company assesses qualitative factors of each its three reporting units to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, including goodwill. The assessments conducted as of December 31, 2016 indicated that it is not more likely than not that the fair values of two of the Company’s three reporting units are less than their carrying amounts, including goodwill. Thus, the Company has determined that it is not necessary to proceed with the two-step goodwill impairment test and that there is no goodwill impairment for these two reporting units. For the third reporting unit, the results of the Company’s assessment of qualitative factors were not conclusive, thus, the Company proceeded with the two-step goodwill impairment test. First, the Company determined if the carrying amount of this reporting unit exceeds its fair value. The fair value of the reporting unit was calculated using the income approach. Under the income approach, the fair value of the reporting unit was calculated by estimating the present value of associated future cash flows. Upon completion of step one of this test, the analysis indicated that the estimated fair value of the third reporting unit substantially exceeded the carry amounts, plus goodwill, of the reporting unit. The Company applied a hypothetical 10 percent decrease to the fair value of the reporting unit, which at December 31, 2016, would not have triggered additional impairment testing and analysis. There was no goodwill impairment for this reporting unit. Revenue Recognition Product Sales. The Company recognizes revenue from sales of products upon shipment when title and risk of loss passes, and when terms are fixed and collection is probable. In an instance where terms of a product sale include subjective customer acceptance criteria, revenue is deferred until the Company has achieved the acceptance criteria, unless customer acceptance terms are perfunctory or inconsequential. Service Revenue. Revenue from services includes after-market services, installation and implementation of products, and turnkey security screening services. Generally, revenue from services is recognized when the services are performed. Revenues from out-of-warranty service maintenance contracts are recognized ratably over the respective terms of such contracts. Deferred revenue for such services arises from payments received from customers for services not yet performed. Multiple-Deliverable Arrangements. The Company enters into certain agreements with customers for the all-inclusive sale of capital equipment that contain multiple elements that may include civil works to prepare a site for the installation of equipment, the manufacture and delivery of equipment, the installation and integration of equipment, the training of customer personnel to operate the equipment and the after-market service of the equipment. The timing for each of these deliverables can range from a short amount of time and be completed entirely within a single reporting period to over several reporting periods depending upon the after-market service period. The general timing of revenue recognition for each deliverable may be dependent upon several milestones, including physical delivery of equipment, completion of factory acceptance test, completion of site acceptance test, installation and connectivity of equipment, certification of training of personnel and, in the case of after-market service deliverables, the passage of time as service revenue within a multiple-deliverable arrangement typically is recognized evenly over the post-warranty period of the service deliverable. Multiple-deliverable arrangements require that the arrangement consideration be allocated to each deliverable based on its relative selling price and recognized as revenue when the revenue recognition criteria for each deliverable has been met. The arrangement is separated into more than one unit of accounting if both of the following criteria are met: (i) the delivered item has value to the customer on a stand-alone basis; and (ii) if the arrangement includes a general right of return relative to the delivered item, delivery or performance of the undelivered item is considered probable and substantially within the Company’s control. If these criteria are not met, the arrangement is accounted for as one unit of accounting and the recognition of revenue is deferred until delivery is complete or is recognized ratably over the contract period as appropriate. If these criteria are met, consideration is allocated at inception of the arrangement to all deliverables on the basis of the relative selling price. The Company has generally met these criteria as all of the deliverables in its multiple-deliverable arrangements have stand-alone value in that either the customer can resell that item or another vendor sells that item separately. The Company typically does not offer a general right of return in regards to its multiple-deliverable arrangements. The selling price of each deliverable is determined by establishing vendor-specific objective evidence (“VSOE”), third party evidence (“TPE”) or best estimate of selling price (“BESP”) for each delivered item. Generally, either VSOE or TPE is determinable; however, in the few instances where neither VSOE nor TPE is determinable, the Company utilizes its BESP in order to allocate consideration to those deliverables. BESP for the Company’s product deliverables is determined by utilizing a weighted average price approach. BESP for the Company’s service deliverables is determined primarily by utilizing a cost plus margin approach, and in some instances uses an average price per hour. The Company often provides a guarantee to support its performance under multiple-deliverable arrangements; and in the event that customers are permitted to terminate such arrangements, the underlying contract typically requires payment for deliverables and reimbursement of costs incurred through the date of termination. Proportional Performance. In connection with the agreement with the Servicio de Administración Tributaria (“SAT”) in Mexico, revenue is recognized based upon proportional performance, measured by the actual number of labor hours incurred divided by the total estimated number of labor hours for the project. The impact of changes in the estimated labor hours to service the agreement is reflected in the period during which the change becomes known. In the SAT agreement, customer billings may be submitted for several separate deliverables, including monthly services, activation of services, training of customer personnel and consultation on the design and location of security scanning operations, among others. In the event that payments received from the customer exceed revenue recognition, deferred revenue is recorded. Concurrent with the revenue recognition, the Company accrues reserves for estimated product return and warranty costs. Critical judgments made by management related to revenue recognition include the determination of whether or not customer acceptance criteria are perfunctory or inconsequential. The determination of whether or not customer acceptance terms are perfunctory or inconsequential impacts the amount and timing of revenue recognition. Critical judgments also include estimates of warranty reserves, which are established based on historical experience and knowledge of the product under warranty. Recent Accounting Updates Not Yet Adopted In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued an accounting standards update (“ASU”) amending revenue recognition requirements for multiple-deliverable revenue arrangements. This update provides guidance on how revenue is recognized for the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for the goods or services. This determination is made in five steps: (i) identify the contract with the customer; (ii) identify the performance obligations in the contract; (iii) determine the transaction price; (iv) allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract; and (v) recognize revenue when (or as) the entity satisfies a performance obligation. The ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017 and for interim reporting periods within such fiscal years. Earlier adoption is permitted only for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim reporting periods within such fiscal years. In May 2016, FASB issued a narrow scope improvement to this ASU, specifically to clarify two aspects - identifying performance obligations and licensing implementation guidance. The Company has not yet selected a transition method and its preliminary evaluation of the impact of this ASU indicates that it will not have a material adverse impact on its financial condition and results of operations. In July 2015, FASB issued an ASU amending some of the guidance on subsequent measurement of inventory. This ASU affects companies that are using first-in, first-out or average cost or any other methods besides last-in, first out or the retail inventory method. This ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim reporting periods within that reporting period. The amendments in this ASU should be applied prospectively with earlier application permitted as of the beginning of an interim or annual reporting period. The Company has not yet adopted this ASU and is currently evaluating the impact it may have on its financial condition and results of operations. In January 2016, FASB issued an ASU which affects the accounting for equity investments, financial liabilities under the fair value option and the presentation and disclosure requirements for financial instruments. This guidance retains the current accounting for classifying and measuring investments in debt securities and loans but requires equity investments to be measured at fair value with subsequent changes recognized in net income, except for those accounted for under the equity method or requiring consolidation. The guidance also changes the accounting for investments without a readily determinable fair value and that do not qualify for the practical expedient permitted by the guidance to estimate fair value. A policy election can be made for these investments whereby estimated fair value may be measured at cost and adjusted in subsequent periods for any impairment or changes in observable prices of identical or similar investments. This ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within such fiscal year. Early application is permitted. The Company has not yet adopted this ASU and is currently evaluating the impact it may have on its financial condition and results of operations. In February 2016, the FASB issued an ASU which affects the accounting for leases. The ASU requires lessees to recognize assets and liabilities on the balance sheet for the rights and obligations created by all leases with terms of more than 12 months. The amendment also will require qualitative and quantitative disclosures designed to give financial statement users information on the amount, timing and uncertainty of cash flows arising from leases. This ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, and interim periods within such fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted. The Company has not yet adopted this ASU and is currently evaluating the impact it may have on its financial condition and results of operations. In March 2016, the FASB issued an ASU relating to employee share-based payment accounting. This ASU simplifies several aspects of the accounting for employee share-based payment transactions, including accounting for income taxes, forfeitures and statutory tax withholding requirements, as well as classification in the statement of cash flows. This ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim periods within such fiscal years. The Company has not yet adopted this ASU and is currently evaluating the impact it may have on its financial condition and results of operations. In August 2016, the FASB issued an ASU to address the diverse classifications being applied to cash receipts and payments in the cash flow statement. This ASU addresses eight specific cash flow issues to reduce diversity in practice. This ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within such fiscal years. The Company has not yet adopted this ASU and is currently evaluating the impact it may have on its financial condition and results of operations.

X
- References No definition available. + Details
Name: | us-gaap_AccountingPoliciesAbstract
Namespace Prefix: | us-gaap_
Data Type: | xbrli:stringItemType
Balance Type: | na
Period Type: | duration

X
- Definition The entire disclosure for the general note to the financial statements for the reporting entity which may include, descriptions of the basis of presentation, business description, significant accounting policies, consolidations, reclassifications, new pronouncements not yet adopted and changes in accounting principles. + References No definition available. + Details
Name: | us-gaap_OrganizationConsolidationBasisOfPresentationBusinessDescriptionAndAccountingPoliciesTextBlock
Namespace Prefix: | us-gaap_
Data Type: | nonnum:textBlockItemType
Balance Type: | na
Period Type: | duration