XML 26 R15.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT
v3.7.0.1

Commitments and Contingencies | 9 Months Ended
--- | ---
Mar. 31, 2017
Commitments and Contingencies |
Commitments and Contingencies | 9. Commitments and Contingencies Contingent Acquisition Obligations Under the terms and conditions of the agreements associated with certain acquisitions, the Company may be obligated to make additional payments based on the achievement by the acquired operations of certain sales or profitability milestones. The maximum amount of such future payments under arrangements with contingent consideration caps was $20.8 million as of March 31, 2017. In addition, one of the purchase agreements the Company entered into requires royalty payments through 2022 based on the license of, or sales of products containing, the technology of CXR Limited, a company acquired in 2004. For acquisitions that occurred through the end of fiscal year 2009, the Company accounts for such contingent payments as an addition to the purchase price of the acquired business. For acquisitions after fiscal 2009, the estimated fair value of these obligations is recorded as a liability at the time of the acquisition with subsequent revisions recorded in Selling, general and administrative expense in the condensed consolidated financial statements. The estimated fair value measurements of contingent earn-out obligations are primarily based on unobservable inputs, which may include projected revenues, gross margins, operating income, estimated probability of achieving and the estimated probability of earn-out payments being made. These projections and probabilities are used to estimate future contingent earnout payments, which are discounted back to present value to compute the contingent earnout liability. The following table reconciles the contingent earnout liabilities, which are included in Other accrued expenses and current liabilities, and Other long-term liabilities in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets, from June 30, 2016 to March 31, 2017:
Beginning fair value, June 30, 2016 |  | $ | 17,117 |
Remeasurement of fair value for contingent earn-out obligations |  | (1,370 | )
Payments on contingent earn-out obligations |  | (1,400 | )
Ending fair value, March 31, 2017 |  | $ | 14,347 |
Advances from Customers The Company receives advances from customers associated with certain projects. In fiscal 2012, the Company entered into an agreement with the Mexican government to provide a turnkey security screening solution at various locations throughout the country. Associated with the agreement, the Company was provided an advance totaling $100 million. The Company is obligated to provide a guarantee until the advance has been amortized. As of June 30, 2016 and March 31, 2017, $25.0 million and $6.3 million, respectively, of this advance remains outstanding and is included in Advances from customers. Environmental Contingencies The Company is subject to various environmental laws. The Company’s practice is to conduct appropriate environmental investigations at its manufacturing facilities in North America, Asia-Pacific and Europe and, to the extent practicable, to conduct investigations on all new properties in order to identify, as of the date of such investigation, potential areas of environmental concern related to past and present activities or from nearby operations. In certain cases, the Company has conducted further environmental assessments consisting of soil and groundwater testing and other investigations deemed appropriate by independent environmental consultants. During one investigation at the Company’s Hawthorne, California facility, the Company discovered soil and groundwater contamination that it believes was the result of unspecified on- and off-site releases occurring prior to the Company’s occupancy. Historical usage of this site includes semiconductor and electronics manufacturing, dating back to the mid-1960s, as well as possible aircraft and related manufacturing dating to the early 1940s. Similar operations, including chemical manufacturing and storage, were conducted at neighboring sites throughout that period and into the 1990s. It is not presently known when the releases occurred or by whom they were caused, though Company records, in conjunction with data obtained from soil and groundwater surveys, support the Company’s assertion that these releases are historical in nature, having occurred prior to the Company’s occupancy. Further, the groundwater contamination is a known regional issue, not limited to the Company’s premises or its immediate surroundings. The Company has filed all requisite reports with the appropriate environmental authorities and continues to cooperate with the local governing agency to develop a complete and accurate characterization of this site. Recent activities include the installation of groundwater monitoring wells, indoor air quality monitoring and additional soil and soil vapor studies. Results from these studies are being evaluated to determine the extent of the on-site releases as well as appropriate and cost-effective remedial action measures. Periodic groundwater monitoring is expected to continue until such time as governing authorities request further action. The Company has not accrued for loss contingencies relating to the Hawthorne facility or any other environmental matters because it believes that, although unfavorable outcomes may be possible, they are not considered by the Company’s management to be probable and reasonably estimable. If one or more of these environmental matters are resolved in a manner adverse to the Company, the impact on the Company’s business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flow could be material. Indemnifications In the normal course of business, the Company has agreed to indemnify certain parties with respect to specified matters. The Company has agreed to hold these parties harmless against losses arising from a breach of representations, warranties or covenants or intellectual property infringement or other claims made by third parties. These agreements sometimes limit the time within which an indemnification claim can be made and the amount of the claim. In addition, the Company has entered into indemnification agreements with its directors and certain of its officers. It is not possible to determine the maximum potential liability exposure under these indemnification agreements due to the limited history of prior indemnification claims and the unique facts and circumstances involved in each particular agreement. The Company had not recorded any liability for costs related to contingent indemnification obligations as of March 31, 2017. Product Warranties The Company offers its customers warranties on many of the products that it sells. These warranties typically provide for repairs and maintenance of the products if problems arise during a specified time period after original shipment. Concurrent with the sale of products, the Company records a provision for estimated warranty expenses with a corresponding increase in cost of goods sold. The Company periodically adjusts this provision based on historical experience and anticipated expenses. The Company charges actual expenses of repairs under warranty, including parts and labor, to this provision when incurred. Outstanding warranty provisions are included in Other accrued expenses and current liabilities in the condensed consolidated balance sheets. The following table presents changes in warranty provisions (in thousands):
|  | Nine Months Ended March 31, |
|  | 2016 |  | 2017 |
Balance at beginning of period |  | $ | 12,738 |  | $ | 15,948 |
Additions and adjustments |  | 8,596 |  | 6,514 |
Reductions for warranty repair costs |  | (7,361 | ) | (4,395 | )
Balance at end of period |  | $ | 13,973 |  | $ | 18,067 |
Legal Proceedings Three shareholder derivative complaints (the “Derivative Actions”) have been filed purportedly on behalf of the Company against the members of the Company’s Board of Directors (as individual defendants). Hagan v. Chopra et al. was filed in the United States District Court for the Central District of California (the “Court”) on April 15, 2014, and was subsequently consolidated by the Court with City of Irving Benefit Plan v. Chopra et al., which was filed on December 29, 2014. Kocen v. Chopra et al. was filed in the Delaware Court of Chancery on July 14, 2015. The Derivative Actions generally assert claims for breach of fiduciary duties and unjust enrichment against the individual defendants on behalf of the Company. Plaintiffs in the Derivative Actions seek unspecified damages, restitution, injunctive relief, attorneys’ and experts’ fees, costs and expenses and other unspecified relief. Following mediation and post-mediation settlement discussions, the parties to the Derivative Actions reached a settlement, which would provide for the resolution of all pending claims in both the California and Delaware actions, subject to the Court’s approval. The settlement reached includes reimbursement of attorneys’ fees, which is expected to be covered by insurance. The Company and the other defendants agreed to the settlement to avoid further expense, inconvenience and the distraction and inherent risks of burdensome and protracted litigation. In the settlement, neither the Company nor the individual defendants conceded any wrongdoing or liability, and the Company continues to believe that they have meritorious defenses to all claims alleged in the Derivative Actions. On January 24, 2017, the Court granted preliminary approval of the settlement. Stockholders seeking information about the settlement are directed to the Company’s Investor Relations website, located at http://investors.osi-systems.com/. Information contained on or that can be accessed through the Company’s website is not incorporated herein by reference. The Company’s recently acquired subsidiary, AS&E, has been the subject of an investigation by the Office of the Inspector General of the U.S. General Services Administration (“GSA”). The investigation relates to AS&E’s discount practices and compliance with the pricing provisions of AS&E’s GSA Schedule contract. The investigation could lead to claims or findings of violations of the False Claims Act in connection with AS&E’s GSA contracting activity. Violations of the False Claims Act could result in the imposition of damages (up to treble damages) plus civil penalties in some cases, and the Company expects to incur legal costs in connection with the investigation. The Company and AS&E continue to cooperate with the GSA investigation and management believes that an appropriate accrual for this uncertainty has been provided in the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements. The Company is involved in various other claims and legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business. In the Company’s opinion after consultation with legal counsel, the ultimate disposition of such proceedings is not likely to have a material adverse effect on its business, financial condition, results of operations or cash flows. The Company has not accrued for loss contingencies relating to these various other claims because it believes that, although unfavorable outcomes in the proceedings may be possible, they are not considered by management to be probable and reasonably estimable. If one or more of these matters are resolved in a manner adverse to the Company, the impact on the Company’s business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flow could be material.

X
- References No definition available. + Details
Name: | us-gaap_CommitmentsAndContingenciesDisclosureAbstract
Namespace Prefix: | us-gaap_
Data Type: | xbrli:stringItemType
Balance Type: | na
Period Type: | duration

X
- Definition The entire disclosure for commitments and contingencies. + References Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 825 -SubTopic 20 -Section 50 -Paragraph 1 -URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6449706&loc=d3e16207-108621 Reference 2: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 460 -SubTopic 10 -Section 50 -Paragraph 8 -URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=68068213&loc=d3e12565-110249 Reference 3: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 450 -SubTopic 20 -Section 50 -Paragraph 4 -URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=25496072&loc=d3e14435-108349 Reference 4: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 210 -SubTopic 10 -Section S99 -Paragraph 1 -Subparagraph (SX 210.5-02.25) -URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6877327&loc=d3e13212-122682 Reference 5: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 440 -SubTopic 10 -Section 50 -Paragraph 2 -URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=73718637&loc=d3e25287-109308 + Details
Name: | us-gaap_CommitmentsAndContingenciesDisclosureTextBlock
Namespace Prefix: | us-gaap_
Data Type: | nonnum:textBlockItemType
Balance Type: | na
Period Type: | duration