10-Q 1 d559743d10q.htm FORM 10-Q

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

x | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2013

OR

¨ | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to

Commission file number 001-36041

INDEPENDENCE REALTY TRUST, INC.

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)

Maryland |  | 26-4567130
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization) |  | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
Cira Centre 2929 Arch St., 17th Floor Philadelphia, PA |  | 19104
(Address of Principal Executive Offices) |  | (Zip Code)

(215) 243-9000

(Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code)

N/A

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large Accelerated filer |  | ¨ |  | Accelerated filer |  | ¨
Non-Accelerated filer |  | x |  | Smaller reporting company |  | ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x

As of August 13, 2013 there were 5,643,540 shares of the Registrant’s common stock issued and outstanding.

INDEPENDENCE REALTY TRUST, INC.

INDEX

|  | Page |
PART I—FINANCIAL INFORMATION |  |  | 3 |
Item 1. |  | Financial Statements (unaudited) |  |  | 3 |
|  | Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 |  |  | 3 |
|  | Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Three-Month and Six-Month Periods ended June 30, 2013 and June 30, 2012 |  |  | 4 |
|  | Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Six-Month Periods ended June 30, 2013 and June 30, 2012 |  |  | 5 |
|  | Condensed Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements as of June 30, 2013 (unaudited) |  |  | 6 |
Item 2. |  | Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |  |  | 16 |
Item 3. |  | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk |  |  | 22 |
Item 4. |  | Controls and Procedures |  |  | 22 |
PART II—OTHER INFORMATION |  |  | 22 |
Item 1. |  | Legal Proceedings |  |  | 22 |
Item 1A. |  | Risk Factors |  |  | 22 |
Item 2. |  | Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds |  |  | 22 |
Item 3. |  | Defaults Upon Senior Securities |  |  | 23 |
Item 4. |  | Mine Safety Disclosures |  |  | 23 |
Item 5. |  | Other Information |  |  | 23 |
Item 6. |  | Exhibits |  |  | 23 |
Signatures |  |  | 23 |

ii

PART I—FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. | Financial Statements

Independence Realty Trust, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Balance Sheets

(Unaudited and dollars in thousands, except share and per share data)

|  | As of June 30, 2013 |  |  | As of December 31, 2012 |
ASSETS: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Investments in real estate: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Investments in real estate at cost |  | $ | 154,040 |  |  | $ | 153,565 |
Accumulated depreciation |  |  | (13,949 | ) |  |  | (12,283 | )
Investments in real estate, net |  |  | 140,091 |  |  |  | 141,282 |
Cash and cash equivalents |  |  | 2,248 |  |  |  | 2,533 |
Restricted cash |  |  | 856 |  |  |  | 1,150 |
Accounts receivable and other assets |  |  | 1,010 |  |  |  | 345 |
Intangible assets, net of accumulated amortization of $314 and $79, respectively |  |  | 39 |  |  |  | 274 |
Deferred costs, net of accumulated amortization of $104 and $68, respectively |  |  | 577 |  |  |  | 613 |
Total Assets |  | $ | 144,821 |  |  | $ | 146,197 |
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Mortgage indebtedness |  | $ | 92,360 |  |  | $ | 92,413 |
Accounts payable and accrued expenses |  |  | 1,769 |  |  |  | 1,986 |
Accrued interest payable |  |  | 31 |  |  |  | 32 |
Dividends payable |  |  | 376 |  |  |  | 499 |
Other liabilities |  |  | 454 |  |  |  | 416 |
Total Liabilities |  |  | 94,990 |  |  |  | 95,346 |
Equity: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Stockholders’ equity: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value; 50,000,000 shares authorized, 125 and 125 shares issued and outstanding, respectively |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |
Common stock, $0.01 par value; 300,000,000 shares authorized, 5,643,540 and 345,063 shares issued and outstanding, respectively |  |  | 56 |  |  |  | 3 |
Additional paid-in capital |  |  | 47,229 |  |  |  | 3,490 |
Retained earnings (accumulated deficit) |  |  | (954 | ) |  |  | (401 | )
Total stockholders’ equity |  |  | 46,331 |  |  |  | 3,092 |
Non-controlling interest |  |  | 3,500 |  |  |  | 47,759 |
Total Equity |  |  | 49,831 |  |  |  | 50,851 |
Total Liabilities and Equity |  | $ | 144,821 |  |  | $ | 146,197 |

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

3

Independence Realty Trust, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Operations

(Unaudited and dollars in thousands, except share and per share data)

|  | For the Three-Month Periods Ended June 30 |  |  | For the Six-Month Periods Ended June 30 |
|  | 2013 |  |  | 2012 |  |  | 2013 |  |  | 2012 |
REVENUE: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Rental income |  | $ | 4,218 |  |  | $ | 3,652 |  |  | $ | 8,396 |  |  | $ | 7,218 |
Tenant reimbursement and other property income |  |  | 220 |  |  |  | 201 |  |  |  | 443 |  |  |  | 394 |
Other income |  |  | 262 |  |  |  | 233 |  |  |  | 549 |  |  |  | 464 |
Total revenue |  |  | 4,700 |  |  |  | 4,086 |  |  |  | 9,388 |  |  |  | 8,076 |
EXPENSES: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Property operating expenses |  |  | 2,241 |  |  |  | 1,924 |  |  |  | 4,406 |  |  |  | 3,809 |
General and administrative expenses |  |  | 94 |  |  |  | 247 |  |  |  | 271 |  |  |  | 499 |
Asset Management Fees |  |  | 79 |  |  |  | 53 |  |  |  | 161 |  |  |  | 106 |
Acquisition expenses |  |  | — |  |  |  | 13 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 40 |
Depreciation and amortization |  |  | 1,063 |  |  |  | 811 |  |  |  | 2,099 |  |  |  | 1,631 |
Total expenses |  |  | 3,477 |  |  |  | 3,048 |  |  |  | 6,937 |  |  |  | 6,085 |
Operating income |  |  | 1,223 |  |  |  | 1,038 |  |  |  | 2,451 |  |  |  | 1,991 |
Interest expense |  |  | (899 | ) |  |  | (799 | ) |  |  | (1,787 | ) |  |  | (1,599 | )
Net income (loss): |  |  | 324 |  |  |  | 239 |  |  |  | 664 |  |  |  | 392 |
Income allocated to preferred shares |  |  | (4 | ) |  |  | (4 | ) |  |  | (8 | ) |  |  | (8 | )
Income (loss) allocated to non-controlling interest |  |  | (272 | ) |  |  | (249 | ) |  |  | (604 | ) |  |  | (424 | )
Net income (loss) allocable to common shares |  | $ | 48 |  |  | $ | (14 | ) |  | $ | 52 |  |  | $ | (40 | )
Earnings (loss) per share: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Basic |  | $ | 0.01 |  |  | $ | (0.04 | ) |  | $ | 0.03 |  |  | $ | (0.18 | )
Diluted |  | $ | 0.01 |  |  | $ | (0.04 | ) |  | $ | 0.03 |  |  | $ | (0.18 | )
Weighted-average shares: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Basic |  |  | 3,556,349 |  |  |  | 320,000 |  |  |  | 1,959,998 |  |  |  | 222,747 |
Diluted |  |  | 3,556,349 |  |  |  | 320,000 |  |  |  | 1,959,998 |  |  |  | 222,747 |
Dividends declared per common share |  | $ | 0.16 |  |  | $ | 0.15 |  |  | $ | 0.31 |  |  | $ | 0.30 |

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

4

Independence Realty Trust, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(Unaudited and dollars in thousands)

|  | For the Six-Month Periods Ended June 30 |
|  | 2013 |  |  | 2012 |
Cash flows from operating activities: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Net income (loss) |  | $ | 664 |  |  | $ | 392 |
Depreciation and amortization |  |  | 2,099 |  |  |  | 1,631 |
Amortization of deferred financing costs |  |  | 36 |  |  |  | 92 |
Changes in assets and liabilities: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Accounts receivable and other assets |  |  | (665 | ) |  |  | (64 | )
Accounts payable and accrued expenses |  |  | (116 | ) |  |  | (155 | )
Other liabilities |  |  | 38 |  |  |  | (21 | )
Net cash from operating activities |  |  | 2,056 |  |  |  | 1,875 |
Cash flows from investing activities: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Capital expenditures |  |  | (673 | ) |  |  | (592 | )
Increase in restricted cash |  |  | 294 |  |  |  | 89 |
Net cash from investing activities |  |  | (379 | ) |  |  | (503 | )
Cash flows from financing activities: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Proceeds from issuance of preferred stock |  |  | — |  |  |  | 100 |
Proceeds from issuance of common stock |  |  | 207 |  |  |  | 2,970 |
Payments for deferred financing costs |  |  | (102 | ) |  |  | 7 |
Debt repayments |  |  | (53 | ) |  |  | — |
Distributions on common stock |  |  | (333 | ) |  |  | (52 | )
Distributions on preferred stock |  |  | (8 | ) |  |  | (8 | )
Distributions to non-controlling interests |  |  | (1,673 | ) |  |  | (1,556 | )
Net cash from financing activities |  |  | (1,962 | ) |  |  | 1,461 |
Net change in cash and cash equivalents |  |  | (285 | ) |  |  | 2,833 |
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period |  |  | 2,533 |  |  |  | 1,107 |
Cash and cash equivalents, end of the period |  | $ | 2,248 |  |  | $ | 3,940 |
Supplemental cash flow information: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Cash paid for interest |  | $ | 1,752 |  |  | $ | 1,575 |
Non cash decrease in noncontrolling interest from conversion of common limited partnership units to shares of common stock |  | $ | 43,532 |  |  | $ | — |

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

5

Independence Realty Trust, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

As of June 30, 2013

(Unaudited and dollars in thousands, except share and per share data)

NOTE 1: Organization

Independence Realty Trust, Inc., or the Company, was formed on March 26, 2009 as a Maryland corporation that has elected to be taxed as a real estate investment trust, or REIT, commencing with the taxable year ended December 31, 2011. We are externally managed by a subsidiary of RAIT Financial Trust, or RAIT, a publicly traded Maryland REIT whose common shares are listed on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “RAS.” As used herein, the terms “we,” “our” and “us” refer to the Company and, as required by context, Independence Realty Operating Partnership, LP, which we refer to as our operating partnership, and their subsidiaries. We currently hold a portfolio of apartment properties and intend to invest the net proceeds of our public offering described below in a diversified portfolio of apartment properties that have the potential to generate attractive returns. We own substantially all of our assets and conduct our operations through our operating partnership, of which we are the sole general partner.

We sold 20,000 shares of our common stock to Independence Realty Advisors, LLC, our advisor, on April 30, 2009. Our advisor was purchased on January 20, 2011 by a wholly owned subsidiary of RAIT. Our advisor transferred its 20,000 shares to RAIT NTR Holdings, LLC, or RAIT NTR, an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of RAIT, on June 18, 2012.

On June 10, 2011, our Registration Statement on Form S-11 (File No. 333-173391), or the prior registration statement, for a continuous offering of a minimum of 250,000 shares and a maximum of 100,000,000 shares of common stock for sale to the public at a price of $10.00 per share (subject to certain discounts) in the primary offering and $9.50 per share pursuant to our distribution reinvestment plan, which we refer to collectively as our continuous offering, was declared effective under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Act. During the quarter ended March 31, 2012, we satisfied the minimum offering amount of our offering as a result of our sale of 300,000 shares of our common stock for $10.00 per share for total gross proceeds of $3,000 to RAIT NTR. During the three months ended June 30, 2013, we sold an additional 12,000 shares in our offering to unaffiliated investors. Through April 8, 2013, we sold common stock pursuant to this registered continuous offering carried out in a manner consistent with offerings of non-listed REITs. Subsequently, we decided to sell shares of common stock in an underwritten public offering and terminate our continuous offering. Accordingly, we amended the prior registration statement, on April 26, 2013 to terminate our continuous offering and describe the anticipated underwritten public offering, or the underwritten offering.

We subsequently determined to register the shares of common stock that were to be offered in the underwritten public offering by filing a Registration Statement on Form S-11 (File No. 333-188577), or the registration statement, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC, on May 14, 2013. On August 13, 2013, the SEC declared the registration statement effective and we announced the pricing of our public offering of 4,000,000 shares of common stock at a public offering price of $8.50 per share for total gross proceeds of approximately $34.0 million. We also granted the underwriters a 30-day option to purchase up to an additional 600,000 shares of common stock at the public offering price, less underwriting discounts and commissions, solely to cover overallotments, if any. The net proceeds of the offering are estimated to be approximately $31.1 million after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering expenses, prior to any exercise of the underwriters’ overallotment option. We intend to use the net proceeds from the offering to acquire additional properties, redeem all of our and our operating partnership’s outstanding preferred securities and for general corporate purposes. A registration statement relating to these securities has been declared effective by the SEC. This offering is being made solely by means of a prospectus.

In order to facilitate our qualification as a REIT, on January 4, 2012, we issued and sold 125 shares of our 12.5% Series A Cumulative Non-Voting Preferred Stock to 125 accredited investors who are not affiliated with us.

Subject to certain restrictions and limitations, our business is externally managed on a day-to-day basis by our advisor, a wholly owned subsidiary of RAIT, pursuant to an advisory agreement between us and our advisor. Our advisor conducts our operations and manages our portfolio of real estate investments. We have no paid employees.

As of June 30, 2013, we owned eight apartment properties with 2,004 units located in six states.

NOTE 2: Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

a. Basis of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited interim consolidated financial statements have been prepared by management in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, or GAAP. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in annual consolidated financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and

6

Independence Realty Trust, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

As of June 30, 2013

(Unaudited and dollars in thousands, except share and per share data)

regulations, although we believe that the included disclosures are adequate to make the information presented not misleading. The unaudited interim consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with our audited financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2012 included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K. In the opinion of management, all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, necessary to present fairly our consolidated financial position and consolidated results of operations and cash flows are included. The results of operations for the interim periods presented are not necessarily indicative of the results for the full year.

b. Principles of Consolidation

The consolidated financial statements reflect our accounts and the accounts of our operating partnership and other wholly-owned subsidiaries. All intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

c. Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

d. Organization and Offering Costs

We have incurred accounting and offering costs in connection with our continuous offering and expect to incur additional accounting and offering costs in connection with our underwritten offering. The offering and organization costs, which are primarily being incurred by our advisor, are expected to be paid or reimbursed by us with offering proceeds.

Our advisor has advanced or reimbursed, and may continue to advance or reimburse, all the organization and offering costs incurred on our behalf. We will reimburse our advisor up to 1.0% of gross offering proceeds. As of June 30, 2013, our gross offering proceeds were $3,483. Organization and offering costs include items such as legal and accounting fees, marketing, promotional and printing costs. All organizational cost will be expensed when incurred. All offering costs will be recorded as a reduction of additional paid-in-capital when incurred. Our advisor has incurred $4,478 of organization and offering costs from our date of inception through June 30, 2013, of which $35 have been reimbursed to our advisor.

e. Revenue Recognition

Minimum rents are recognized on an accrual basis, over the terms of the related leases on a straight-line basis. Any above-market lease values and the capitalized below-market lease values are amortized as an adjustment to rental income over the lease term. Recoveries from residential tenants for utility costs are recognized as revenue in the period that the applicable costs are incurred.

f. Accounts Receivable and Allowance for Bad Debts

We make estimates of the collectability of our accounts receivable related to base rents, expense reimbursements and other revenue. We analyze accounts receivable and historical bad debt levels, tenant credit worthiness and current economic trends when evaluating the adequacy of the allowance for doubtful accounts. In addition, tenants experiencing financial difficulties are analyzed and estimates are made in connection with expected uncollectible receivables. Our reported operating results are directly affected by management’s estimate of the collectability of accounts receivable.

g. Investments in Real Estate

Allocation of Purchase Price of Acquired Assets

We account for acquisitions of properties in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 805, “Business Combinations”. The fair value of the real estate acquired is allocated to the acquired tangible assets, consisting of land, building and tenant improvements, and identified intangible assets and liabilities, consisting of the value of above-market and below-market leases for acquired in-place leases and the value of tenant relationships, based in each case on their fair values. Purchase accounting is applied to assets and liabilities associated with the real estate acquired. Transaction costs and fees incurred related to acquisitions are expensed as incurred. Transaction costs and fees incurred related to the acquisition of a joint venture interest, accounted for under the equity method of accounting, are capitalized as part of the cost of the investment.

7

Independence Realty Trust, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

As of June 30, 2013

(Unaudited and dollars in thousands, except share and per share data)

Upon the acquisition of properties, we estimate the fair value of acquired tangible assets (consisting of land, building and improvements) and identified intangible assets and liabilities (consisting of above and below-market leases, in-place leases and tenant relationships), and assumed debt at the date of acquisition, based on the evaluation of information and estimates available at that date. Based on these estimates, we allocate the initial purchase price to the applicable assets and liabilities. As final information regarding fair value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed is received and estimates are refined, appropriate adjustments will be made to the purchase price allocation, in no case later than twelve months of the acquisition date.

In determining the fair value of the identified intangible assets and liabilities of an acquired property, above-market and below-market in-place lease values are recorded based on the present value (using an interest rate which reflects the risks associated with the leases acquired) of the differences between (i) the contractual amounts to be paid pursuant to the in-place leases and (ii) management’s estimate of fair market lease rates for the corresponding in-place leases, measured over a period equal to the remaining term of the lease. The capitalized above-market lease values and the capitalized below-market lease values are amortized as an adjustment to rental income over the lease term.

The aggregate value of in-place leases is determined by evaluating various factors, including an estimate of carrying costs during the expected lease-up periods, current market conditions and similar leases. In estimating carrying costs, management includes real estate taxes, insurance and other operating expenses, and estimates of lost rental revenue during the expected lease-up periods based on current market demand. Management also estimates costs to execute similar leases including leasing commissions, legal and other related costs. The value assigned to this intangible asset is amortized over the remaining lease terms.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

Management evaluates the recoverability of its investment in real estate assets, including related identifiable intangible assets, in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 360, “Property, Plant and Equipment”. This statement requires that long-lived assets be reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that recoverability of the assets is not assured.

Management evaluates the long-lived assets on an ongoing basis and records an impairment charge when there is an indicator of impairment. The estimated cash flows used for the impairment analysis and the determination of estimated fair value are based on our plans for the respective assets and our views of market and economic conditions. The estimates consider matters such as current and historical rental rates, occupancies for the respective and/or comparable properties, and recent sales data for comparable properties. Changes in estimated future cash flows due to changes in our plans or views of market and economic conditions could result in recognition of impairment losses, which, under the applicable accounting guidance, could be substantial.

Depreciation and Amortization

Depreciation expense for real estate assets are computed using a straight-line method based on a life of 40 years for buildings and improvements and five to ten years for equipment and fixtures. Expenditures for tenant improvements are capitalized and amortized over the initial term of each lease.

h. Fair Value of Financial Instruments

In accordance with FASB ASC Topic 820, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures”, fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Where available, fair value is based on observable market prices or parameters or derived from such prices or parameters. Where observable prices or inputs are not available, valuation models are applied. These valuation techniques involve management estimation and judgment, the degree of which is dependent on the price transparency for the instruments or market and the instruments’ complexity for disclosure purposes. Assets and liabilities recorded at fair value in the consolidated balance sheets are categorized based upon the level of judgment associated with the inputs used to measure their value. Hierarchical levels, as defined in FASB ASC Topic 820, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures” and directly related to the amount of subjectivity associated with the inputs to fair valuations of these assets and liabilities, are as follows:

• Level 1: Valuations are based on unadjusted, quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities at the measurement date. The types of assets carried at level 1 fair value generally are equity securities listed in active markets. As such, valuations of these investments do not entail a significant degree of judgment.

• Level 2: Valuations are based on quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets or quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active or for which all significant inputs are observable, either directly or indirectly.

• Level 3: Inputs are unobservable inputs for the asset or liability, and include situations where there is little, if any, market activity for the asset or liability. In certain cases, the inputs used to measure fair value may fall into different levels of the fair value hierarchy. In such cases, the level in the fair value hierarchy within which the fair value measurement in its entirety

8

Independence Realty Trust, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

As of June 30, 2013

(Unaudited and dollars in thousands, except share and per share data)

falls has been determined based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety. Our assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment, and considers factors specific to the asset.

The availability of observable inputs can vary depending on the financial asset or liability and is affected by a wide variety of factors, including, for example, the type of investment, whether the investment is new, whether the investment is traded on an active exchange or in the secondary market, and the current market condition. To the extent that valuation is based on models or inputs that are less observable or unobservable in the market, the determination of fair value requires more judgment. Accordingly, the degree of judgment exercised by us in determining fair value is greatest for instruments categorized in level 3.

Fair value is a market-based measure considered from the perspective of a market participant who holds the asset or owes the liability rather than an entity-specific measure. Therefore, even when market assumptions are not readily available, our own assumptions are set to reflect those that management believes market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability at the measurement date. We use prices and inputs that management believes are current as of the measurement date, including during periods of market dislocation. In periods of market dislocation, the observability of prices and inputs may be reduced for many instruments. This condition could cause an instrument to be transferred from Level 1 to Level 2 or Level 2 to Level 3.

Fair value for certain of our Level 3 financial instruments is derived using internal valuation models. These internal valuation models include discounted cash flow analyses developed by management using current interest rates, estimates of the term of the particular instrument, specific issuer information and other market data for securities without an active market. In accordance with FASB ASC Topic 820, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures”, the impact of our own credit spreads is also considered when measuring the fair value of financial assets or liabilities, including derivative contracts. Where appropriate, valuation adjustments are made to account for various factors, including bid-ask spreads, credit quality and market liquidity. These adjustments are applied on a consistent basis and are based on observable inputs where available. Management’s estimate of fair value requires significant management judgment and is subject to a high degree of variability based upon market conditions, the availability of specific issuer information and management’s assumptions.

FASB ASC Topic 825, “Financial Instruments” requires disclosure of the fair value of financial instruments for which it is practicable to estimate that value. The fair value of mortgage indebtedness is based on a discounted cash flows valuation technique, which classifies this as a level 3 liability within the fair value hierarchy. The carrying value and fair value of mortgage indebtedness as of June 30, 2013 is $92,360 and $92,876, respectively. The carrying value and fair value of mortgage indebtedness as of December 31, 2012 was $92,413 and $95,827, respectively. The fair value of cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash approximates cost due to the nature of these instruments.

i. Deferred Costs

We capitalize initial direct costs in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 310, “Receivables”. The costs are capitalized upon the execution of the loan or lease and amortized over the initial term of the corresponding loan or lease. Deferred loan costs are amortized to interest expense over the term of the loan. Deferred leasing costs are amortized to amortization expense over the initial term of the lease.

j. Income Taxes

We have elected to be taxed as a REIT beginning with the taxable year ended December 31, 2011. Accordingly, we recorded no income tax expense for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012.

To qualify as a REIT, we must meet certain organizational and operational requirements, including a requirement to distribute at least 90% of our ordinary taxable income to stockholders. As a REIT, we generally are not subject to federal income tax on taxable income that we distribute to our stockholders. If we fail to qualify as a REIT in any taxable year, we will be subject to federal income taxes on our taxable income at regular corporate rates and will not be permitted to qualify for treatment as a REIT for federal income tax purposes for four years following the year during which qualification is lost unless the Internal Revenue Service grants us relief under certain statutory provisions. Such an event could materially adversely affect our net income and net cash available for distribution to stockholders, however, we believe that we are organized and operate in such a manner as to qualify and maintain treatment as a REIT and intend to operate in such a manner so that we will remain qualified as a REIT for federal income tax purposes.

9

Independence Realty Trust, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

As of June 30, 2013

(Unaudited and dollars in thousands, except share and per share data)

k. Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In June 2011, the FASB issued an accounting standard classified under FASB ASC Topic 222, “Comprehensive Income”. This accounting standard amends existing guidance to improve the comparability, consistency, and transparency of financial reporting and to increase the prominence of items reported in other comprehensive income by requiring entities to present the total of comprehensive income, the components of net income, and the components of other comprehensive income in either a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. In addition, the entity is required to present on the face of the financial statements reclassification adjustments for items that are reclassified from other comprehensive income to net income in the statement(s) where the components of net income and the components of other comprehensive income are presented. In December 2011, the FASB issued an accounting standard that deferred the new presentation requirements about reclassification adjustments. Both of these accounting standards are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods with those years, beginning after December 15, 2011. The adoption of these standards did not have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements.

NOTE 3: Investments in Real Estate

As of June 30, 2013, our investments in real estate consisted of eight apartment properties with 2,004 units. The table below summarizes our investments in real estate as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012:

|  | As of June 30, 2013 |  |  | As of December 31, 2012 |
Land |  | $ | 30,168 |  |  | $ | 30,168 |
Building |  |  | 121,390 |  |  |  | 121,390 |
Furniture, fixtures and equipment |  |  | 2,482 |  |  |  | 2,007 |
Total investment in real estate |  |  | 154,040 |  |  |  | 153,565 |
Accumulated depreciation |  |  | (13,949 | ) |  |  | (12,283 | )
Investments in real estate, net |  | $ | 140,091 |  |  | $ | 141,282 |

On October 11, 2012, we acquired a fee simple interest in a 192-unit multifamily residential community located in Indianapolis, Indiana, known as Runaway Bay Apartments. We acquired the property through a wholly owned subsidiary of our operating partnership, from an unaffiliated third party. We acquired the property for an aggregate purchase price of $15,750 exclusive of closing costs. We paid the purchase price with a combination of a $10,238 first mortgage loan and $5,512 in cash.

The following table summarizes the aggregate carrying value of the assets and liabilities associated with the properties acquired during the year ended December 31, 2012, on the respective date of each acquisition, for the real estate accounted for under FASB ASC Topic 805.

Description |  | Carrying Amount |
Assets acquired: |  |  |  |
Investments in real estate |  | $ | 15,397 |
Intangible asset |  |  | 353 |
Liabilities assumed: |  |  |  |
Mortgage indebtedness |  |  | (10,238 | )
Carrying amount of net assets acquired |  |  | 5,512 |

10

Independence Realty Trust, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

As of June 30, 2013

(Unaudited and dollars in thousands, except share and per share data)

Our consolidated unaudited pro forma information, after including the acquisition of real estate properties, is presented below as if the acquisitions occurred on January 1, 2012. These pro forma results are not necessarily indicative of the results which actually would have occurred if the acquisition had occurred on the first day of the periods presented, nor does the pro forma financial information purport to represent the results of operations for future periods:

Description |  | For the Three-Month Period Ended June 30, 2012 |  |  | For the Six-Month Period Ended June 30, 2012 |
Total revenue, as reported |  | $ | 4,086 |  |  | $ | 8,076 |
Pro forma revenue |  |  | 4,625 |  |  |  | 9,154 |
Net income (loss) allocable to common shares, as reported |  |  | (14 | ) |  |  | (40 | )
Pro forma net income (loss) allocable to common shares |  |  | (12 | ) |  |  | (43 | )

NOTE 4: Mortgage Indebtedness

Each of our properties is encumbered by a first mortgage. A summary of each mortgage, as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, is as follows:

|  | Outstanding Principal |  |  |  |  |  |
Property |  | As of June 30, 2013 |  |  | As of December 31, 2012 |  |  | Current Interest Rate |  |  | Maturity Date
Belle Creek Apartments |  |  | 10,575 |  |  |  | 10,575 |  |  |  | 2.5 | (1) |  | April 28, 2021
Centrepoint Apartments |  |  | 17,600 |  |  |  | 17,600 |  |  |  | 3.7 | (2) |  | January 1, 2019
Copper Mill Apartments |  |  | 7,335 |  |  |  | 7,350 |  |  |  | 5.7 | (3) |  | May 1, 2021
Crestmont Apartments |  |  | 6,737 |  |  |  | 6,750 |  |  |  | 5.7 | (3) |  | May 1, 2021
Cumberland Glen Apartments |  |  | 6,886 |  |  |  | 6,900 |  |  |  | 5.7 | (3) |  | May 1, 2021
Heritage Trace Apartments |  |  | 5,489 |  |  |  | 5,500 |  |  |  | 5.7 | (3) |  | May 1, 2021
Runaway Bay Apartments |  |  | 10,238 |  |  |  | 10,238 |  |  |  | 3.6 | (4) |  | November 1, 2022
Tresa at Arrowhead |  |  | 27,500 |  |  |  | 27,500 |  |  |  | 2.5 | (1) |  | April 28, 2021
Total /Weighted-Average |  | $ | 92,360 |  |  | $ | 92,413 |  |  |  | 3.8 | % |  |

(1) | Floating rate at 225 basis points over 30-day LIBOR. As of June 30, 2013 30-day LIBOR was 0.19%. Interest only payments are due monthly.

(2) | Fixed rate. Interest only payments are due monthly. Beginning February 1, 2015, principal and interest payments are required based on a 30-year amortization schedule.

(3) | Fixed rate. Interest only payments are due monthly. Beginning May 1, 2013, principal and interest payments are required based on a 30-year amortization schedule.

(4) | Fixed Rate. Interest only payments are due monthly. Beginning December 1, 2013, principal and interest payments are required based on a 30-year amortization schedule.

As of June 30, 2013 RAIT holds $38,075 of our debt while $54,285 is held by third parties. As of December 31, 2012, RAIT holds $38,075 of our debt while $54,338 is held by third parties. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2013, we paid $241 and $479 of interest to RAIT, respectively. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, we paid $241 and $481 of interest to RAIT, respectively.

NOTE 5: Shareholder Equity and Non-Controlling Interest

Stockholder Equity

Preferred Shares

On February 28, 2013, our board of directors authorized and declared distributions on our Series A Preferred Stock for the period beginning on January 1, 2013, and ending on June 30, 2013. The distributions are payable to the holders of the Series A Preferred Stock of record at a rate of $0.34722222 per day, which is an amount that is equivalent to a 12.5% annualized distribution rate based on a share price of $1,000. The distributions were aggregated and paid in cash on June 28, 2013, pursuant to the requirements of our charter.

11

Independence Realty Trust, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

As of June 30, 2013

(Unaudited and dollars in thousands, except share and per share data)

On July 25, 2013, our board of directors authorized setting aside amounts sufficient to redeem our Series A Preferred Stock with the proceeds of our underwritten offering.

Common Shares

On February 28, 2013, our board of directors authorized and declared distributions on our common stock for the months of January through June 2013. For the months of January through March 2013, the distributions were payable to the holders of our common stock at a rate of $0.00163934 per share per day, which is an amount that is equivalent to a 6.0% annualized distribution rate based on a share price of $10.00. For the months of April through June 2013, our board of directors authorized and declared distributions on our common stock at a rate of $0.00171233 per share per day, which is an amount that is equivalent to a 6.25% annualized distribution rate based on a share price of $10.00. The distributions for each month were aggregated and paid on or before the fifteenth day following the completion of each respective month. All distributions were paid in cash.

On July 25, 2013, our board of directors declared the following dividends for July, August and September 2013:

Month |  | Record Date |  | Payment Date |  | Dividend Declared Per Share
July 2013 |  | August 5, 2013 |  | August 15, 2013 |  | $0.05333
August 2013 |  | August 30, 2013 |  | September 13, 2013 |  | $0.05333
September 2013 |  | September 30, 2013 |  | October 15, 2013 |  | $0.05333

Non-controlling Interest

On February 28, 2013, our board of directors, in our capacity as the general partner of the operating partnership, authorized and declared distributions on our operating partnership’s common partnership units for the months of January through June 2013. For the months of January through March 2013, the distributions were paid to the holders of our common operating partnership units at a rate of $0.00163934 per unit per day, which is an amount that is equivalent to a 6.0% annualized distribution rate based on a unit price of $10.00. For the months of April through June 2013, our board of directors authorized and declared distributions on our operating partnership’s common units at a rate of $0.00171233 per share per day, which is an amount that is equivalent to a 6.25% annualized distribution rate based on a unit price of $10.00. The distributions for each month will be aggregated and paid on or before the fifteenth day following the completion of each respective month.

On February 28, 2013, our board of directors, in our capacity as the general partner of the operating partnership, authorized and declared distributions on our operating partnership’s Series B Preferred Units for the period of January, February and March 2013. The distributions will be paid to holders of our Series B Preferred Units of record at a rate of $2.78 per unit per day.

On May 7, 2013, our board of directors, in our capacity as the general partner of the operating partnership, authorized and declared distributions on our operating partnership’s Series B Preferred Units for the period of April, May and June 2013. The distributions will be paid to holders of our Series B Preferred Units of record at a rate of $2.78 per unit per day.

On July 25, 2013, our board of directors, in our capacity as the general partner of the operating partnership, authorized setting aside amounts sufficient to redeem our operating partnership’s Series B Preferred Units with the proceeds of our underwritten offering. Our operating partnership, at its option, may redeem the Series B Preferred Units, in whole or in part, at any time or from time to time for a redemption price equal to $10 plus all accrued and unpaid distributions thereon to and including the date fixed for redemption.

On May 7, 2013, RAIT elected to convert 5,274,900 of its common limited partnership units to shares of our common stock according to the terms of the Agreement of Limited Partnership. The shares of our common stock issued were issued in reliance on an exemption from registration pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.

NOTE 6: Equity Compensation Plans

Long Term Incentive Plan

On April 5, 2011, our board of directors approved and adopted the Long Term Incentive Plan, or our incentive plan, and the Independent Directors Compensation Plan. Our incentive plan provides for the grants of awards to our directors, officers and full-time employees (in the event we ever have employees), full-time employees of our advisor and its affiliates, full-time employees of entities that provide services to our advisor, directors of our advisor or of entities that provide services to it, certain of our consultants and certain consultants to our advisor and its affiliates or to entities that provide services to our advisor. The incentive plan authorizes the grant of restricted or unrestricted shares of our common stock, non-qualified and incentive stock options, restricted stock units, stock appreciation rights, dividend equivalents and other stock- or cash-based awards. On July 29, 2013, our board of directors and stockholders approved the amendment and restatement of our incentive plan to reduce the number of shares of common stock issuable thereunder to 800,000 shares.

12

Independence Realty Trust, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

As of June 30, 2013

(Unaudited and dollars in thousands, except share and per share data)

Under our Independent Directors Compensation Plan, which operates as a sub-plan of our incentive plan, each of our independent directors will receive 3,000 shares of common stock annually. In addition, our independent directors may elect to receive their annual fee in the form of our common shares or a combination of common shares and cash.

We will account for stock-based compensation in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718, “Compensation—Stock Compensation”. Under the fair value recognition provisions of this statement, stock-based compensation cost is measured at the grant date based on the fair value of the award and is recognized as expense of the requisite service period, which is the vesting period. We have not granted any stock-based compensation to date. Stock-based compensation will be classified within general and administrative expense in the consolidated statements of operations. As stock-based compensation expense recognized in the consolidated statement of operations will be based on awards ultimately expected to vest, the amount of expense will be reduced for estimated forfeitures. Forfeitures will be estimated at the time of grant and revised, if necessary, in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from those estimates. Forfeitures will be estimated on experience of other companies in the same industry until entity-specific information is available.

Distribution Reinvestment Program

We adopted a distribution reinvestment program, or the DRP, through which our stockholders may elect to reinvest an amount equal to the distributions declared on their shares of common stock in additional shares in lieu of receiving cash distributions. The common stock available under the DRP was reallocated to the underwritten offering when the amended registration statement was filed and the DRP was subsequently terminated. No selling commissions or dealer manager fees were paid on shares sold under the DRP.

NOTE 7: Related Party Transactions and Arrangements

Fees and Expenses Paid to Our Advisor

Effective as of May 7, 2013, we entered into the Second Amended and Restated Advisory Agreement, or the amended and restated advisory agreement. The amended and restated advisory agreement was adopted primarily to adjust the advisor’s compensation and modify its duties to us.

Pursuant to the terms of the amended advisory agreement, our advisor will be compensated as follows:

| • |  | Annual Base Management Fee of 0.75% of average gross real estate assets. Average gross real estate assets means the average of the aggregate book value of our real estate assets before reserves for depreciation or other similar noncash reserves. We will compute average gross real estate assets by taking the average of these book values at the end of each month during the quarter for which we are calculating the fee. The fee is payable quarterly in an amount equal to 0.1875% of average gross real estate assets as of the last day of such quarter. In July 2013, our advisor agreed to an amendment to our advisory agreement, which provides that the gross assets attributable to the initial eight properties in our existing portfolio are excluded from the computation of the base management fee payable to the advisor, which amendment is retroactive to April 1, 2013. This agreement will have the effect of increasing our net income, or reducing our net loss, in future periods from what they otherwise would be.

| • |  | We will pay our advisor an incentive fee based on our pre-incentive fee core funds from operations, or Core FFO, a non-GAAP measure as defined in the advisory agreement. The incentive fee is computed at the end of each fiscal quarter as follows:

| • |  | no incentive fee in any fiscal quarter in which our pre-incentive fee Core FFO does not exceed the hurdle rate of 1.75% (7% annualized) of the cumulative gross amount of equity capital we have obtained; and

| • |  | 20% of the amount of our pre-incentive fee Core FFO that exceeds 1.75% (7% annualized) of the cumulative gross amount of equity capital we have obtained.

For the three and six-month periods ended June 30, 2013 we incurred $79 of incentive fees payable to our advisor.

Our advisor generally has responsibility for our day-to-day operations. Pursuant to the terms of the advisory agreement, through May 7, 2013 we paid our advisor the fees described below.

| • |  | We paid to our advisor an asset management fee that is payable quarterly in an amount equal to 0.1875% of the average invested assets as of the last day of the quarter, which equates to an annualized rate of 0.75% per annum. Average invested assets means the average of the aggregate book value of our assets invested in interests in, and loans secured by, real estate before reserves for depreciation or bad debt or other similar non-cash reserves. As part of the acquisition of our initial portfolio of six properties, our advisor agreed to waive any asset management fees on the initial portfolio for the first two years of our ownership. That period expired in April 2013. For the three and six-month periods ended June 30, 2013, we paid $82 and $162 of asset management fees to our advisor, respectively. For the three and six-month periods ended June 30, 2012, we paid $53 and $62 of asset management fees to our advisor, respectively. As of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 we had liabilities payable to our advisor for asset management fees of $79 and $80, respectively.

| • |  | If our advisor provided services in connection with the financing of any third party debt that we obtain, we would pay the advisor a financing coordination fee equal to 1.0% of the amount available and/or outstanding under such financing,

13

Independence Realty Trust, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

As of June 30, 2013

(Unaudited and dollars in thousands, except share and per share data)

| subject to certain limitations. We do not pay financing coordination fees in connection with debt provided by RAIT. The services our advisor may perform include, without limitation, searching for lenders in connection with a proposed refinancing and negotiating the terms of any proposed refinancing with such lenders. Our advisor may reallow some or all of this fee to reimburse third parties that it retains to procure any such refinancing. For the three and six-month periods ended June 30, 2013, we paid $102 and $102 of financing coordination fees to our advisor, respectively. For the three and six-month periods ended June 30, 2012, we did not pay any financing coordination fees to our advisor. As of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, we had liabilities payable to our advisor for financing coordination fees of $0 and $102, respectively.

| • |  | We may pay our advisor a disposition fee upon the sale of one or more of our properties in an amount equal to the lesser of (a) one-half of the commission that would be reasonable, customary and competitive in light of the size, type and location of the asset or (b) 1% of the sale price of the asset. Payment of such fee may be made only if the advisor provides a substantial amount of services in connection with the sale of the asset. In addition, the amount paid when added to all other commissions paid to unaffiliated parties in connection with such sale shall not exceed the lesser of the commission that would be reasonable, customary and competitive in light of the size, type and location of the asset or an amount equal to 6% of the sale price of such asset. For the three and six-month periods ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, we did not pay any disposition fees to our advisor.

In addition to the fees we pay to our advisor pursuant to the advisory agreement prior to May 7, 2013, we also reimbursed our advisor and its affiliates for the costs and expenses, subject to the limitations described below under the heading “2%/25% Guidelines.” We did not reimburse the advisor or its affiliates for services for which the advisor or its affiliates are entitled to compensation in the form of a separate fee. If the advisor or its affiliates perform services that are outside of the scope of the advisory agreement, we will compensate them at rates and in amounts agreed upon by the advisor and the independent directors. We reimburse our advisor for acquisition expenses up to a maximum amount which, collectively with all acquisition fees and expenses, will not exceed, in the aggregate, 6% of the gross offering proceeds from our continuous offering.

| • |  | We may reimburse our advisor for certain costs it incurs in connection with the services it provides to us including, but not limited to: (i) organization and offering costs in an amount up to 1% of gross offering proceeds, which include actual legal, accounting, printing and expenses attributable to preparing the SEC registration statement, qualification of the shares for sale in the states and filing fees incurred by the advisor, as well as reimbursements for salaries and direct expenses of its employees, including, without limitation, employee benefits, while engaged in registering the shares and other organization costs, other than selling commissions and the dealer manager fee; (ii) advertising expenses, expense reimbursements, and legal and accounting fees; (iii) the actual cost of goods and materials used by us and obtained from entities not affiliated with the advisor; (iv) administrative services (including personnel costs; provided, however, that no reimbursement shall be made for costs of personnel to the extent that such personnel perform services in transactions for which the advisor receives a separate fee); and (v) rent, leasehold improvement costs, utilities or other administrative items generally constituting our advisor’s overhead. We will not reimburse the advisor for any services for which we will pay the advisor a separate fee. For the three and six-month period ended June 30, 2013, our advisor incurred $86 and $288 of organization and offering costs, respectively. For the three and six-month periods ended June 30, 2012, our advisor incurred $327 and $513 of organization and offering costs, respectively. During the three and six-months ended June 30, 2013, we reimbursed our advisor for $1 and $3, respectively, of organization and offering costs.

| • |  | We reimburse our advisor for expenses it incurs in connection with our purchase of an asset. The acquisition fees and expenses for any particular asset, including amounts payable to affiliates, will not exceed, in the aggregate, 6% of the contract purchase price (including any mortgage assumed) of the asset. Our advisor will be paid acquisition expenses and we will reimburse our advisor for acquisition expenses only to the extent that acquisition fees and acquisition expenses collectively do not exceed 6% of the contract price of our assets. For the three and six-month period ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, we did not reimburse our advisor for any acquisition expenses.

| • |  | During the six-month period ended June 30, 2013, our advisor reimbursed us for $132 of transfer agent costs we incurred from January 2013 through May 2013 in connection with the continuous offering.

2%/25% Guidelines

Our charter was amended on May 7, 2013. The amendments included removing the 2%/25% Guidelines.

Commencing on the fourth fiscal quarter following the quarter ended June 30, 2011 through May 7, 2013 our advisor must reimburse us for the amounts, if any, by which our total REIT operating expenses paid during the previous fiscal year exceed the greater of:

| • |  | 2% of our average invested assets for that fiscal year; or

| • |  | 25% of our net income for that fiscal year;

provided, however, that only so much of the excess specified above will be required to be reimbursed as the board of directors, including a majority of the independent directors, determines should justifiably be reimbursed in light of any unanticipated, unusual or non-recurring factors. Within 60 days after the end of the quarter for which the excess occurred, the stockholders will be sent a written disclosure and explanation of the factors the independent directors considered in arriving at the conclusion that the higher total operating expenses were justified. Operating expenses are defined for this purpose as all expenses paid or incurred by us, as

14

Independence Realty Trust, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

As of June 30, 2013

(Unaudited and dollars in thousands, except share and per share data)

determined under GAAP, that are in any way related to our operation, including advisory fees, but excluding (i) the expenses of raising capital such as organization and offering expenses, legal, audit, accounting, underwriting, brokerage, listing, registration and other fees, printing and other such expenses and taxes incurred in connection with the issuance, distribution, transfer, registration and stock exchange listing of our stock; (ii) interest payments; (iii) taxes; (iv) non-cash expenditures such as depreciation, amortization and bad debt reserves; (v) reasonable incentive fees based on the gain from the sale of our assets; and (vi) acquisition fees and expenses (including expenses relating to potential investments that we do not close), disposition fees on the resale of property and other expenses connected with the acquisition, disposition and ownership of real estate interests, loans or other property (including the costs of foreclosure, insurance premiums, legal services, maintenance, repair and improvement of property).

Selling Commissions and Fees Paid to our Dealer Manager

The dealer manager for our continuous offering of common stock was IR Securities, an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of RAIT. IR Securities is a licensed broker-dealer registered with FINRA. IR Securities did not participate in the underwritten offering and our agreement with IR Securities was terminated when we terminated our continuous offering. IR Securities was entitled to certain selling commissions, dealer manager fees and reimbursements relating to raising capital in connection with the continuous offering. Our agreement with IR Securities provided for the following compensation relating to the continuous offering:

| • |  | We paid IR Securities selling commissions of up to 7.0% of the gross proceeds from our continuous offering. IR Securities reallowed all or a portion of commissions earned for those transactions that involve participating broker-dealers. For the three and six-month period ended June 30, 2013, we did not pay any selling commissions to IR Securities.

| • |  | We paid IR Securities a dealer manager fee of 3.0% of the gross proceeds from our continuous offering. IR Securities, in its sole discretion, could reallow a portion of its dealer manager fee of up to 1.5% of the gross offering proceeds to be paid to such participating broker-dealers. For the three and six-month period ended June 30, 2013, we paid $2 and $4 of dealer manager fees to IR Securities, respectively. For the three and six-month period ended June 30, 2012, we did not pay any dealer manager fees to IR Securities.

| • |  | We reimbursed IR Securities for its reasonable bona fide due diligence expenses and reimbursed it for reimbursements it could make to broker-dealers for reasonable bona fide due diligence expenses which are included in a detailed and itemized invoice. Reimbursement of these amounts, combined with the reimbursement of all other organizational and offering costs, was not to exceed 15% of the gross proceeds raised in our continuous offering. For the three and six-month period ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, IR Securities did not incur any reimbursable due diligence expenses.

Property Management Fees Paid to Our Property Manager

We have entered into property management agreements with Jupiter Communities, LLC, or our property manager, which is majority owned by RAIT, with respect to each of our properties. Pursuant to the property management agreements, we pay our property manager property management and leasing fees on a monthly basis of an amount up to 4.0% of the gross revenues from the property for each month. Additionally, we may pay our property manager a separate fee for the one-time initial rent-up or leasing-up of newly constructed properties in an amount not to exceed the fee customarily charged in arm’s length transactions by others rendering similar services in the same geographic area for similar properties as determined by a survey of brokers and agents in such area. Each management agreement has an initial one year term, subject to automatic one-year renewals unless either party gives prior notice of its desire to terminate the management agreement. For the three and six-month period ended June 30, 2013, we paid $191 and $373, respectively, of property management and leasing fees to our property manager. For the three and six-month periods ended June 30, 2012, we paid $157 and $318 of property management and leasing fees to our property manager, respectively. As of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, we had liabilities payable to our property manager for property management and leasing fees of $59.

NOTE 8: Earnings (Loss) Per Share

The following table presents a reconciliation of basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share for the three-month and six-month periods ended June 30, 2013 and 2012:

|  | For the Three-Month Periods Ended June 30 |  |  | For the Six-Month Periods Ended June 30 |
|  | 2013 |  |  | 2012 |  |  | 2013 |  |  | 2012 |
Net Income (loss) |  | $ | 324 |  |  | $ | 239 |  |  | $ | 664 |  |  | $ | 392 |
(Income) loss allocated to preferred shares |  |  | (4 | ) |  |  | (4 | ) |  |  | (8 | ) |  |  | (8 | )
(Income) loss allocated to noncontrolling interests |  |  | (272 | ) |  |  | (249 | ) |  |  | (604 | ) |  |  | (424 | )
Net Income (loss) allocable to common shares |  |  | 48 |  |  |  | (14 | ) |  |  | 52 |  |  |  | (40 | )
Weighted-average shares outstanding—Basic |  |  | 3,556,349 |  |  |  | 320,000 |  |  |  | 1,959,998 |  |  |  | 222,747 |
Weighted-average shares outstanding—Diluted |  |  | 3,556,349 |  |  |  | 320,000 |  |  |  | 1,959,998 |  |  |  | 222,747 |
Earnings (loss) per share—Basic |  | $ | 0.01 |  |  | $ | (0.04 | ) |  | $ | 0.03 |  |  | $ | (0.18 | )
Earnings (loss) per share—Diluted |  | $ | 0.01 |  |  | $ | (0.04 | ) |  | $ | 0.03 |  |  | $ | (0.18 | )

Earnings per share is computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 260, “Earnings per Share”, by dividing the net income by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the respective period. Earnings per share for the three and six-month periods ended June 30, 2012 excludes 5,274,900 limited partnership units that are convertible into common stock as their effect would be anti-dilutive.

15

Item 2. | Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Forward-Looking Statements

Certain statements included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q that are not historical facts (including any statements concerning investment objectives, other plans and objectives of management for future operations or economic performance, or assumptions or forecasts related thereto) are forward-looking statements. These statements are only predictions. We caution that forward-looking statements are not guarantees. Actual events or our investments and results of operations could differ materially from those expressed or implied in any forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are typically identified by the use of terms such as “may,” “should,” “expect,” “could,” “intend,” “plan,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “believe,” “continue,” “predict,” “potential” or the negative of such terms and other comparable terminology.

The forward-looking statements included herein are based upon our current expectations, plans, estimates, assumptions and beliefs, which involve numerous risks and uncertainties. Assumptions relating to the foregoing involve judgments with respect to, among other things, future economic, competitive and market conditions and future business decisions, all of which are difficult or impossible to predict accurately and many of which are beyond our control. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in such forward-looking statements are based on reasonable assumptions, our actual results and performance could differ materially from those set forth in the forward-looking statements. Factors which could have a material adverse effect on our operations and future prospects include, but are not limited to:

| • |  | the fact that we have a limited operating history;

| • |  | our ability to effectively deploy the proceeds we expect to raise in our underwritten public offering of common stock;

| • |  | changes in economic conditions generally and the real estate market specifically;

| • |  | legislative or regulatory changes (including changes to the laws governing the taxation of REITs);

| • |  | the availability of capital;

| • |  | interest rates; and

| • |  | changes to generally accepted accounting principles, or GAAP.

Any of the assumptions underlying the forward-looking statements included herein could be inaccurate, and undue reliance should not be placed on any forward-looking statements included herein. All forward-looking statements are made as of the date this quarterly report is filed with the SEC, and the risk that actual results will differ materially from the expectations expressed herein will increase with the passage of time. Except as otherwise required by the federal securities laws, we undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements made herein, whether as a result of new information, future events, changed circumstances or any other reason.

All forward-looking statements included herein should be read in light of the factors identified in the “Risk Factors” section of our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 13, 2013, as the same may be amended and supplemented from time to time.

Overview

We are a Maryland corporation that owns well-located apartment properties in geographic submarkets that we believe support strong occupancy and have the potential for growth in rental rates. We seek to provide stockholders with attractive risk-adjusted returns, with an emphasis on distributions and capital appreciation. We are externally advised by a wholly-owned subsidiary of RAIT financial Trust (NYSE: RAS), a REIT that invests primarily in commercial mortgages and, to a lesser extent, apartment properties. We have elected to be taxed as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, or the Code, commencing with our taxable year ended December 31, 2011.

We acquire and operate apartment properties that:

| • |  | have stable occupancy rates and resident bases;

| • |  | are located in submarkets that we do not expect to experience substantial new apartment construction in the foreseeable future;

| • |  | in appropriate circumstances, have opportunities for repositioning or updating through capital expenditures; and

| • |  | provide opportunities to apply tailored marketing and management strategies designed to attract and retain residents and enable rent increases.

16

As of June 30, 2013, we own eight apartment properties containing an aggregate of 2,004 apartment units in Arizona, Colorado, Georgia, Indiana, Texas and Virginia. We refer to these apartment properties as our “existing portfolio.” As of June 30, 2013, our existing portfolio had an average occupancy of 94.2% and an average monthly effective rent per occupied apartment unit of $789.

We were formed in 2009. Affiliates of RAIT contributed seven of the eight properties in our existing portfolio to our operating partnership in exchange for 5,111,500 common units in our operating partnership, and acquired an additional 163,200 common units for cash to fund closing costs in connection with the contributions. In 2012, we purchased the eighth property in our existing portfolio from an unaffiliated third party. In May 2013, we terminated our continuous offering and amended our registration statement. RAIT exchanged all of its common units for 5,274,900 shares of our common stock. RAIT is currently our largest stockholder, and, following the exchange but before consummation of our offering, will hold approximately 99.1% of the outstanding shares of our common stock. Each of our apartment properties is managed by Jupiter, a majority owned subsidiary of RAIT.

On June 10, 2011, our Registration Statement on Form S-11 (File No. 333-173391), or the prior registration statement, for a continuous offering of a minimum of 250,000 shares and a maximum of 100,000,000 shares of common stock for sale to the public at a price of $10.00 per share (subject to certain discounts) in the primary offering and $9.50 per share pursuant to our distribution reinvestment plan, which we refer to collectively as our continuous offering, was declared effective under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Act. During the quarter ended March 31, 2012, we satisfied the minimum offering amount of our offering as a result of our sale of 300,000 shares of our common stock for $10.00 per share for total gross proceeds of $3,000 to RAIT NTR. During the three months ended June 30, 2013, we sold an additional 12,000 shares in our offering to unaffiliated investors. Through April 8, 2013, we sold common stock pursuant to this registered continuous offering carried out in a manner consistent with offerings of non-listed REITs. Subsequently, we decided to sell shares of common stock in an underwritten public offering and terminate our continuous offering. Accordingly, we amended the prior registration statement, on April 26, 2013 to terminate our continuous offering and describe the anticipated underwritten public offering, or the underwritten offering.

We subsequently determined to register the shares of common stock that were to be offered in the underwritten public offering by filing a Registration Statement on Form S-11 (File No. 333-188577), or the registration statement, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC, on May 14, 2013. On August 13, 2013, the SEC declared the registration statement effective and announced the pricing of our public offering of 4,000,000 shares of common stock at a public offering price of $8.50 per share for total gross proceeds of approximately $34.0 million. We also granted the underwriters a 30-day option to purchase up to an additional 600,000 shares of common stock at the public offering price, less underwriting discounts and commissions, solely to cover overallotments, if any. The net proceeds of the offering are estimated to be approximately $31.1 million after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering expenses, prior to any exercise of the underwriters’ overallotment option. We intend to use the net proceeds from the offering to acquire additional properties, redeem all of our and our operating partnership’s outstanding preferred securities and for general corporate purposes. A registration statement relating to these securities has been declared effective by the SEC. This offering is being made solely by means of a prospectus.

Our Properties

The following table presents an overview of our apartment portfolio as of June 30, 2013:

Property Name |  | Location |  | Purchase Date |  |  | Year Built or Renovated (1) |  |  | Units (2) |  |  | Average Occupancy (3) |  |  | Average Monthly Effective Rent per Occupied Unit (4) |
Belle Creek |  | Henderson, Colorado |  |  | 4/29/2011 |  |  |  | 2011 |  |  |  | 162 | (5) |  |  | 96.9 | % |  | $ | 911 |
Centrepoint |  | Tucson, Arizona |  |  | 12/16/2011 |  |  |  | 2006 |  |  |  | 320 |  |  |  | 94.4 | % |  |  | 818 |
Copper Mill |  | Austin, Texas |  |  | 4/29/2011 |  |  |  | 2010 |  |  |  | 320 |  |  |  | 97.8 | % |  |  | 721 |
Crestmont |  | Marietta, Georgia |  |  | 4/29/2011 |  |  |  | 2010 |  |  |  | 228 |  |  |  | 96.9 | % |  |  | 703 |
Cumberland Glen |  | Smyrna, Georgia |  |  | 4/29/2011 |  |  |  | 2010 |  |  |  | 222 |  |  |  | 95.5 | % |  |  | 663 |
Heritage Trace |  | Newport News, Virginia |  |  | 4/29/2011 |  |  |  | 2010 |  |  |  | 200 |  |  |  | 86.5 | % |  |  | 737 |
Runaway Bay |  | Indianapolis, Indiana |  |  | 10/11/2012 |  |  |  | 2002 |  |  |  | 192 |  |  |  | 93.2 | % |  |  | 927 |
Tresa at Arrowhead |  | Phoenix, Arizona |  |  | 4/29/2011 |  |  |  | 2006 |  |  |  | 360 |  |  |  | 91.9 | % |  |  | 833 |
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 2,004 |  |  |  | 94.2 | % |  | $ | 789 |

(1) | All dates are for the year in which a renovation program was completed, except for Runaway Bay, which is the year construction was completed. The year construction was completed for each of the other properties is: Belle Creek - 2002; Centrepoint - 1995; Copper Mill - 1984; Crestmont - 1987; Cumberland Glen - 1987; Heritage Trace - 1973; and Tresa at Arrowhead - 1998.

(2) | Units represents the total number of apartment units available for rent at June 30, 2013.

(3) | Average occupancy for each of our properties is calculated as (i) total units rented as of June 30, 2013 divided by (ii) total units available as of June 30, 2013, expressed as a percentage.

(4) | Average monthly effective rent per occupied unit represents the average monthly rent collected for all occupied units for the six months ended June 30, 2013 after giving effect to tenant concessions.

17

(5) | Does not include 6,256 square feet of retail space in six units, of which 1,010 square feet of space is occupied by Jupiter for use as the leasing office. The remaining 5,246 square feet of space is 100% occupied by five tenants with an average monthly base rent of $1,491, or $15.51 per square foot per year.

Non-GAAP Financial Measures

Funds from Operations and Core Funds from Operations

We believe that FFO and Core FFO, each of which is a non-GAAP measure, are additional appropriate measures of the operating performance of a REIT and us in particular. We compute FFO in accordance with the standards established by the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts, or NAREIT, as net income or loss allocated to common shares (computed in accordance with GAAP), excluding real estate-related depreciation and amortization expense, gains or losses on sales of real estate and the cumulative effect of changes in accounting principles.

Core FFO is a computation made by analysts and investors to measure a real estate company’s operating performance by removing the effect of items that do not reflect ongoing property operations, including acquisition expenses, expensed costs related to the issuance of shares of our common stock and equity-based compensation expenses, from the determination of FFO. We incur acquisition expenses in connection with acquisitions of real estate properties and expense those costs when incurred in accordance with U.S. GAAP. As these expenses are one-time and reflective of investing activities rather than operating performance, we add back these costs to FFO in determining Core FFO.

Our calculation of Core FFO differs from the methodology used for calculating Core FFO by certain other REITs and, accordingly, our Core FFO may not be comparable to Core FFO reported by other REITs. Our management utilizes FFO and Core FFO as measures of our operating performance, and believes they are also useful to investors, because they facilitate an understanding of our operating performance after adjustment for certain non-cash items, such as depreciation and amortization expenses, and acquisition expenses and pursuit costs that are required by GAAP to be expensed but may not necessarily be indicative of current operating performance and that may not accurately compare our operating performance between periods. Furthermore, although FFO, Core FFO and other supplemental performance measures are defined in various ways throughout the REIT industry, we also believe that FFO and Core FFO may provide us and our investors with an additional useful measure to compare our financial performance to certain other REITs. We will also use Core FFO for purposes of determining the quarterly incentive fee, if any, payable to our advisor after April 30, 2013. See “Our Advisor, Our Property Manager and Related Agreements—Compensation to Our Advisor and Our Property Manager.”

Neither FFO nor Core FFO is equivalent to net income or cash generated from operating activities determined in accordance with GAAP. Furthermore, FFO and Core FFO do not represent amounts available for management’s discretionary use because of needed capital replacement or expansion, debt service obligations or other commitments or uncertainties. Neither FFO nor Core FFO should be considered as an alternative to net income as an indicator of our operating performance or as an alternative to cash flow from operating activities as a measure of our liquidity.

18

Set forth below is a reconciliation of net income (loss) to FFO and Core FFO for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 (in thousands, except share and per share information):

|  | For the Three-Month Period Ended June 30, 2013 |  |  | For the Three-Month Period Ended June 30, 2012 |
|  | Amount |  |  | Per Share |  |  | Amount |  |  | Per Share |
Funds From Operations: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Net income (loss) |  | $ | 324 |  |  |  | 0.06 |  |  | $ | 239 |  |  |  | 0.04 |
Adjustments: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Income allocated to preferred shares |  |  | (4 | ) |  |  | (0.00 | ) |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |
Income allocated to preferred units |  |  | (88 | ) |  |  | (0.02 | ) |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |
Real estate depreciation and amortization |  |  | 1,063 |  |  |  | 0.19 |  |  |  | 811 |  |  |  | 0.14 |
Funds From Operations |  | $ | 1,295 |  |  |  | 0.23 |  |  | $ | 1,050 |  |  |  | 0.19 |
Weighted-average shares—diluted (a) |  |  | 5,643,122 |  |  |  | 5,643,122 |  |  |  | 5,594,900 |  |  |  | 5,594,900 |
Core Funds From Operations: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Funds From Operations |  | $ | 1,295 |  |  |  | 0.23 |  |  | $ | 1,050 |  |  |  | 0.19 |
Adjustments: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Acquisition fees and expenses |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 13 |  |  |  | — |
Core Funds From Operations |  | $ | 1,295 |  |  |  | 0.23 |  |  | $ | 1,063 |  |  |  | 0.19 |
Weighted-average shares—diluted (a) |  |  | 5,643,122 |  |  |  | 5,643,122 |  |  |  | 5,594,900 |  |  |  | 5,594,900 |

|  | For the Six-Month Period Ended June 30, 2013 |  |  | For the Six-Month Period Ended June 30, 2012 |
|  | Amount |  |  | Per Share |  |  | Amount |  |  | Per Share |
Funds From Operations: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Net income (loss) |  | $ | 664 |  |  |  | 0.12 |  |  | $ | 392 |  |  |  | 0.07 |
Adjustments: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Income allocated to preferred shares |  |  | (8 | ) |  |  | (0.00 | ) |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |
Income allocated to preferred units |  |  | (175 | ) |  |  | (0.03 | ) |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |
Real estate depreciation and amortization |  |  | 2,099 |  |  |  | 0.37 |  |  |  | 1,631 |  |  |  | 0.30 |
Funds From Operations |  | $ | 2,580 |  |  |  | 0.46 |  |  | $ | 2,023 |  |  |  | 0.37 |
Weighted-average shares—diluted (a) |  |  | 5,632,028 |  |  |  | 5,632,028 |  |  |  | 5,497,647 |  |  |  | 5,497,647 |
Core Funds From Operations: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Funds From Operations |  | $ | 2,580 |  |  |  | 0.46 |  |  | $ | 2,023 |  |  |  | 0.37 |
Adjustments: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Acquisition fees and expenses |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 40 |  |  |  | 0.01 |
Core Funds From Operations |  | $ | 2,580 |  |  |  | 0.46 |  |  | $ | 2,063 |  |  |  | 0.38 |
Weighted-average shares—diluted (a) |  |  | 5,632,028 |  |  |  | 5,632,028 |  |  |  | 5,497,647 |  |  |  | 5,497,647 |

(a) | Weighted-average shares—diluted includes 5,274,900 limited partnership units that were converted to common shares in May 2013.

Results of Operations

Three-Month Period Ended June 30, 2013 Compared to the Three-Month Period Ended June 30, 2012

Our total revenue increased $0.6 million to $4.7 million for the three-month period ended June 30, 2013 from $4.1 million for the three-month period ended June 30, 2012. The increase is primarily attributable to a property we acquired on October 11, 2012 along with improved occupancy and rental rates as compared to occupancies and rental rates in 2012.

19

Our expenses increased $0.5 million to $3.5 million for the three-month period ended June 30, 2013 from $3.0 million for the three-month period ended June 30, 2012. Expenses were comprised primarily of property operating expenses which increased $0.3 million to $2.2 million from $1.9 million for the three-month period ended June 30, 2012 and depreciation and amortization which increased $0.2 million to $1.0 million from $0.8 million for the three-month period ended June 30, 2012. The increase is primarily attributable to a property we acquired on October 11, 2012. We incurred asset management fees during the three-months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 of $0.1 million. We incurred certain general and administrative expenses related to audit and other professional fees, trustee fees and other federal and state filing fees during the three-month periods ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 of $0.1 million and $0.2 million, respectively. During the three-months ended June 30, 2013, our advisor reimbursed $132,000 of transfer agent costs that were incurred from January 2013 through May 2013. This reimbursement reduced our general and administrative expenses during the three-months ended June 30, 2013.

Our advisor waived $0.2 million of asset management fees for the three-month periods ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. If our advisor had not waived the asset management in such periods, such fees would have reduced net income (loss) allocable to common shares by $13,216 and $11,727 for the three-month periods ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

Our interest expense increased $0.1 million to $0.9 million for the three-month period ended June 30, 2013 from $0.8 for the three-month period ended June 30, 2012. The increase is attributable to the mortgage indebtedness used to finance the acquisition of a property that we acquired on October 11, 2012.

Six-Month Period Ended June 30, 2013 Compared to the Six-Month Period Ended June 30, 2012

Our total revenue increased $1.3 million to $9.4 million for the six-month period ended June 30, 2013 from $8.1 million for the six-month period ended June 30, 2012. The increase is primarily attributable to a property we acquired on October 11, 2012 along with improved occupancy and rental rates.

Our expenses increased $0.8 million to $6.9 million for the six-month period ended June 30, 2013 from $6.1 million for the six-month period ended June 30, 2012. Expenses were comprised primarily of property operating expenses which increased $0.6 million to $4.4 million from $3.8 million for the six-month period ended June 30, 2012 and depreciation and amortization which increased $0.5 million to $2.1 million from $1.6 million for the six-month period ended June 30, 2012. The increase is primarily attributable to a property we acquired on October 11, 2012. We incurred asset management fees during the six-months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 of $0.2 million and $0.1 million, respectively. We incurred certain general and administrative expenses related to audit and other professional fees, trustee fees and other federal and state filing fees during the six-month periods ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 of $0.3 million and $0.5 million, respectively. During the six-months ended June 30, 2013, our advisor reimbursed $132,000 of transfer agent costs that were incurred from January 2013 through May 2013. This reimbursement reduced our general and administrative expenses during the six-months ended June 30, 2013.

Our advisor waived $0.4 million of asset management fees for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. If our advisor had not waived the asset management in such periods, such fees would have reduced net income (loss) allocable to common shares by $25,650 and $16,271 for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

Our interest expense increased $0.2 million to $1.8 million for the six-months period ended June 30, 2013 from $1.6 for the six-month period ended June 30, 2012. The increase is attributable to the mortgage indebtedness used to finance the acquisition of a property on October 11, 2012.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Liquidity is a measure of our ability to meet potential cash requirements, including ongoing commitments to repay borrowings, fund and maintain investments, pay distributions and other general business needs.

We believe our available cash balances, the proceeds of the underwritten offering discussed below, other financing arrangements and cash flows from operations will be sufficient to fund our liquidity requirements with respect to our existing portfolio for the next 12 months. We expect that the capital we have raised in our underwritten offering, together with borrowings we may obtain and the future acquisitions we expect to make as a result of the completion of our underwritten offering will have a significant impact on our future results of operations. In general, we expect that our income and expenses related to our portfolio will increase in future periods as a result of anticipated future acquisitions of real estate. Should our liquidity needs exceed our available sources of liquidity, we believe that we could sell assets to raise additional cash. We may not be able to obtain additional financing when we desire to do so or on terms and conditions acceptable to us. If we fail to obtain additional financing, our ability to maintain or grow our business will be constrained.

Our primary cash requirements are to:

| • |  | make investments and fund the associated costs;

| • |  | repay our indebtedness;

| • |  | pay our operating expenses, including fees paid to our advisor and our property manager; and

| • |  | distribute a minimum of 90% of our REIT taxable income (determined without regard to the deduction for dividends paid and excluding net capital gain) and to make investments in a manner that enables us to maintain our qualification as a REIT.

We intend to meet these liquidity requirements primarily through:

| • |  | the use of our cash and cash equivalent balance of $2.2 million as of June 30, 2013;

| • |  | cash generated from operating activities;

| • |  | proceeds from the sale of our common stock pursuant to the underwritten offering described in the registration statement;

| • |  | if required, proceeds from future borrowings and offerings.

Through April 8, 2013, we had sold shares of our common stock pursuant to the continuous offering carried out in a manner consistent with offerings of non-listed REITs. Our board of directors subsequently determined that it would be in our best interest to

20

sell our common stock in an underwritten offering described in the amended registration statement, and terminate our continuous offering. Through June 30, 2013 we had raised $3.5 million, including $0.5 million from unaffiliated investors, in net proceeds from our continuous offering. We will depend on the net proceeds of the underwritten offering described in the registration statement, and any future offerings in which we engage, together with the proceeds of debt financings, to meet our investment objectives of acquiring, owning and operating a portfolio of apartment properties.

On August 13, 2013, the SEC declared the registration statement effective and announced the pricing of our public offering of 4,000,000 shares of common stock at a public offering price of $8.50 per share for total gross proceeds of approximately $34.0 million. We also granted the underwriters a 30-day option to purchase up to an additional 600,000 shares of common stock at the public offering price, less underwriting discounts and commissions, solely to cover overallotments, if any. The net proceeds of the offering are estimated to be approximately $31.1 million after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering expenses, prior to any exercise of the underwriters’ overallotment option. We intend to use the net proceeds from the offering to acquire additional properties, redeem all of our and our operating partnership’s outstanding preferred securities and for general corporate purposes.

We will seek to enhance our growth through the use of prudent amounts of leverage. In general, we intend to limit our aggregate leverage to 70% of the combined initial purchase price of all of our real estate properties. During the period following the underwritten offering, we may employ greater leverage in order to more quickly build a diversified portfolio of assets

Cash Flows

As of June 30, 2013 and 2012, we maintained cash and cash equivalents of approximately $2.2 million and $3.9 million, respectively. Our cash and cash equivalents were generated from the following activities (dollars in thousands):

|  | For the Six-Month Periods Ended June 30 |
|  | 2013 |  |  | 2012 |
Cash flow from operating activities |  | $ | 2,056 |  |  | $ | 1,875 |
Cash flow from investing activities |  |  | (379 | ) |  |  | (503 | )
Cash flow from financing activities |  |  | (1,962 | ) |  |  | 1,461 |
Net change in cash and cash equivalents |  |  | (285 | ) |  |  | 2,833 |
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |  |  | 2,533 |  |  |  | 1,107 |
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |  | $ | 2,248 |  |  | $ | 3,940 |

Our increased cash inflow from operating activities during the six-month period ended June 30, 2013 is due to the acquisition of a property on October 11, 2012 along with improved occupancy and rental rates.

Our cash outflow from investing activities is due to capital expenditures for the eight properties in our portfolio.

The cash flow from our financing activities during the six-month period ended June 30, 2012 is substantially due to the issuance of 300,000 shares of our common stock for $3.0 million in cash.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

None.

Critical Accounting Estimates and Policies

Our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012 contains a discussion of our critical accounting policies. Management discusses our critical accounting policies and management’s judgments and estimates with our Audit Committee.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In June 2011, the FASB issued an accounting standard classified under FASB ASC Topic 222, “Comprehensive Income”. This accounting standard amends existing guidance to improve the comparability, consistency, and transparency of financial reporting and to increase the prominence of items reported in other comprehensive income by requiring entities to present the total of comprehensive income, the components of net income, and the components of other comprehensive income in either a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. In addition, the entity is required to present on the face of the financial statements reclassification adjustments for items that are reclassified from other comprehensive income to net income in the statement(s) where the components of net income and the components of other comprehensive income are presented. In December 2011, the FASB issued an accounting standard that deferred the new presentation requirements about reclassification adjustments. Both of these accounting standards are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods with those years, beginning after December 15, 2011. The adoption of these standards did not have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements.

21

Item 3. | Qualitative and Quantitative Disclosure About Market Risk.

There have been no material changes in quantitative and qualitative market risks during the six months ended June 30, 2013 from the disclosures included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012. Reference is made to Item 7A included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012.

Item 4. | Controls and Procedures.

Disclosure Controls and Procedures

As of the end of the period covered by this report, management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or the Exchange Act). Based upon, and as of the date of, the evaluation, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that the disclosure controls and procedures were effective at the reasonable assurance level in recording, processing, summarizing and reporting on a timely basis, information required to be disclosed by us in our reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

There have been no significant changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during our last fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

PART II—OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. | Legal Proceedings.

None.

Item 1A. | Risk Factors.

There have not been any material changes from the risk factors previously disclosed in Item 1A—“Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012.

Item 2. | Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.

During the six months ended June 30, 2013, our company did not repurchase any of our securities. We previously disclosed our issuances during the six months ended June 30, 2013 of equity securities that were not registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, in our quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2013.

On June 10, 2011, our Registration Statement on Form S-11 (File No. 333-173391) for a continuous offering of a minimum of 250,000 shares and a maximum of 100,000,000 shares of common stock for sale to the public at a price of $10.00 per share (subject to certain discounts) in the primary offering and $9.50 per share pursuant to our distribution reinvestment plan, which we refer to collectively as our continuous offering, was initially declared effective under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Act. Independence Realty Securities, LLC, an affiliate of RAIT, served as the dealer manager for the continuous offering. As of June 30, 2013, we had sold 348,300 shares of our common stock for $10.00 per share for total gross proceeds of $3,483,000, including 300,000 shares sold to a subsidiary of RAIT. Through the filing date of this report, we used $2,012,500 of the proceeds of our offering to partially fund the purchase price for Runaway Bay Apartments. As described above, we have filed the amended registration statement to terminate the continuous offering and describe a proposed underwritten offering.

From the effective date of our registration statement through June 30, 2013, we incurred actual selling commissions, dealer manager fees and organization and other offering costs in our offering in the amounts set forth below. The dealer manager reallowed all of the selling commissions and a portion of the dealer manager fee to participating broker-dealers.

Type of Expense |  | Amount |  |  | Percentage of Offering Proceeds |
Selling commissions |  | $ | 37,305 |  |  |  | 1.07 | %
Dealer manager fees |  |  | 10,995 |  |  |  | 0.32 | %
Other organization and other offering costs |  |  | 34,830 |  |  |  | 1.00 | %
Total expenses related to the offering |  | $ | 83,130 |  |  |  | 2.39 | %

From the commencement of the offering through June 30, 2013, the net offering proceeds to us, after deducting the total expenses related to the offering as described above, were $3,399,870. We have issued 340 shares pursuant to our distribution reinvestment plan through June 30, 2013. On April 26, 2013, we filed the amended registration statement which reallocated the common stock available under the DRP to the underwritten offering and subsequently terminated the DRP.

22

Item 3. | Defaults Upon Senior Securities.

None.

Item 4. | Mine Safety Disclosures.

None.

Item 5. | Other Information.

The disclosure below is intended to satisfy any obligation of the Company to provide disclosure pursuant Item 1.01—“Entry into a Material Definitive Agreement” of Form 8-K.

On August 13, 2013, we issued a press release, or the press release, announcing the pricing of our public offering, or the offering, of shares of our common stock, par value $0.01 per share, or the common stock. The above summary of the press release does not purport to be complete and is qualified in its entirety by the press release, a copy of which is attached to this report as Exhibit 99.1 and incorporated by reference herein.

In connection with the offering, on August 13, 2013, we, our operating partnership, Independence Realty Operating Partnership, LP, and our advisor, Independence Realty Advisors, LLC, entered into an underwriting agreement, or the underwriting agreement, with Ladenburg Thalmann & Co. Inc., as representative of the several underwriters named therein, or the underwriters. The underwriting agreement sets forth the terms and conditions of our offer and sale in connection with the offering of 4,000,000 shares of common stock at a public offering price of $8.50 per share of common stock. As part of the offering, we granted the underwriters an option, exercisable for 30 days, to purchase up to an additional 600,000 shares of common stock.

The underwriting agreement contains customary representations, warranties and agreements made by us, conditions to closing, indemnification rights and obligations of the parties, and termination provisions. Under the terms of the underwriting agreement, we agreed to indemnify the underwriters against certain specified types of liabilities, including liabilities under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, to contribute to payments the underwriters may be required to make in respect of these liabilities and to reimburse the underwriters for certain expenses. The offering was made pursuant to our registration statement on Form S-11 (File No. 333-188577) which was declared effective by the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 13, 2013.

Certain of the underwriters and/or their affiliates have engaged in, and may in the future engage in, investment banking services for our parent company, RAIT Financial Trust, or RAIT, in the ordinary course of their business, including acting as underwriters in connection with public offerings of RAIT’s securities. They have received, or may in the future receive, customary fees and commissions for these transactions. In addition, certain of the underwriters and/or their affiliates may in the future engage in investment banking services for us and our other affiliates in the ordinary course of business for which they may receive customary fees and commissions.

The above summary of the underwriting agreement does not purport to be complete and is qualified in its entirety by the underwriting agreement, a copy of which is attached to this report as Exhibit 1.1 and incorporated by reference herein.

Item 6. | Exhibits.

The exhibits listed on the Exhibit Index (following the signatures section of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q) are included herewith.

23

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

|  |  |  | Independence Realty Trust, Inc.
Date: August 14, 2013 |  |  |  | By: |  | /S/ SCOTT F. SCHAEFFER
|  |  |  |  |  | Scott F. Schaeffer
|  |  |  |  |  | Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and President
|  |  |  |  |  | (Principal Executive Officer)
Date: August 14, 2013 |  |  |  | By: |  | /S/ JAMES J. SEBRA
|  |  |  |  |  | James J. Sebra
|  |  |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
|  |  |  |  |  | (Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)

24

EXHIBIT INDEX

Exhibit |  | Description
1.1 |  | Underwriting Agreement dated August 13, 2013 among Independence Realty Trust, Inc. (the “Company”), Independence Realty Operating Partnership, LP (the “Operating Partnership”), Independence Realty Advisors, LLC, (the “Advisor”) and Ladenburg Thalmann & Co. Inc., as representative of the several underwriters named therein.
3.1 |  | Sixth Articles of Amendment and Restatement of the Company, dated as of May 7, 2013, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2013 (the “First Quarter 10-Q”).
3.2 |  | Second Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Company, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the First Quarter 10-Q.
4.1 |  | Fourth Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Independence Realty Operating Partnership, LP, dated as of May 7, 2013, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the First Quarter 10-Q.
4.2 |  | Registration Rights Agreement by and among the Company, Independence Realty Operating Partnership, LP, RAIT Financial Trust and the RAIT Parties (as defined therein), dated as of July 26, 2013, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 1, 2013.
10.1(a) |  | Second Amended and Restated Advisory Agreement by and among the Company, Independence Realty Operating Partnership, LP and Independence Realty Advisors, LLC, dated as of May 7, 2013, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the First Quarter 10-Q.
10.1(b) |  | First Amendment dated as of July 26, 2013 to the Second Amended and Restated Advisory Agreement dated May 7, 2013 by and among the Company, Independence Realty Operating Partnership, LP and Independence Realty Advisors, LLC, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 1, 2013.
10.2 |  | Independence Realty Trust, Inc. Long Term Incentive Plan (as amended and restated as of July 29, 2013), incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 1, 2013.
10.3 |  | Indemnification Agreement dated March 17, 2011 between the Company and Scott F. Schaeffer, together with the schedule required by Instruction 2 of Item 601 of Regulation S-K, listing other substantially identical agreements incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.22 to Pre-Effective Amendment No. 1 to the Registration Statement on Form S-11 filed on June 18, 2013, Commission File No. 333-188577.
31.1 |  | Certification of the Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
31.2 |  | Certification of the Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.1 |  | Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.2 |  | Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
99.1 |  | Press Release.
101 |  | XBRL (eXtensible Business Reporting Language). The following materials, formatted in XBRL: (i) Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, (ii) Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three-month and six-month periods ended June 30, 2013 and June 30, 2012, (iii) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2013 and June 30, 2012, and (v) notes to the consolidated financial statements as of June 30, 2013. As provided in Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, this information is furnished and not filed for purpose of Sections 11 and 12 of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

25