10-Q 1 skt10q33113.htm 10-Q
United States
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q

| x | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |

For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2013
OR

| o | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |

For the transition period from _________ to _________
Commission file number 1-11986 (Tanger Factory Outlet Centers, Inc.)
Commission file number 333-3526-01 (Tanger Properties Limited Partnership)
TANGER FACTORY OUTLET CENTERS, INC.
TANGER PROPERTIES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

North Carolina (Tanger Factory Outlet Centers, Inc.) | 56-1815473
North Carolina (Tanger Properties Limited Partnership) | 56-1822494
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
3200 Northline Avenue, Suite 360, Greensboro, NC 27408
(Address of principal executive offices)
(336) 292-3010
(Registrant's telephone number)

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Tanger Factory Outlet Centers, Inc. | Yes x No o
Tanger Properties Limited Partnership | Yes x No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

Tanger Factory Outlet Centers, Inc. | Yes x No o
Tanger Properties Limited Partnership | Yes x No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer: and “smaller reporting company” (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934).

Tanger Factory Outlet Centers, Inc. |  |  |  |
x Large accelerated filer |  | o Accelerated filer |  | o Non-accelerated filer |  | o Smaller reporting company

Tanger Properties Limited Partnership |  |  |  |
o Large accelerated filer |  | o Accelerated filer |  | x Non-accelerated filer |  | o Smaller reporting company

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Act).

Tanger Factory Outlet Centers, Inc. | Yes o No x
Tanger Properties Limited Partnership | Yes o No x

As of April 30, 2013, there were 94,415,137 common shares of Tanger Factory Outlet Centers, Inc. outstanding, $.01 par value.

EXPLANATORY NOTE
This report combines the quarterly reports on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2013 of Tanger Factory Outlet Centers, Inc. and Tanger Properties Limited Partnership. Unless the context indicates otherwise, the term, Company, refers to Tanger Factory Outlet Centers, Inc. and subsidiaries and the term, Operating Partnership, refers to Tanger Properties Limited Partnership and subsidiaries. The terms "we", "our" and "us" refer to the Company or the Company and the Operating Partnership together, as the text requires.
Tanger Factory Outlet Centers, Inc. and subsidiaries is one of the largest owners and operators of outlet centers in the United States. The Company is a fully-integrated, self-administered and self-managed real estate investment trust ("REIT") which, through its controlling interest in the Operating Partnership, focuses exclusively on developing, acquiring, owning, operating and managing outlet shopping centers. The outlet centers and other assets are held by, and all of the operations are conducted by, the Operating Partnership and its subsidiaries. Accordingly, the descriptions of the business, employees and properties of the Company are also descriptions of the business, employees and properties of the Operating Partnership.
The Company owns the majority of the units of partnership interest issued by the Operating Partnership through its two wholly-owned subsidiaries, Tanger GP Trust and Tanger LP Trust. Tanger GP Trust controls the Operating Partnership as its sole general partner. Tanger LP Trust holds a limited partnership interest. Through May 31, 2011, the Tanger family, through its ownership of the Tanger Family Limited Partnership, held the remaining units as a limited partner. On June 1, 2011, the Tanger Family Limited Partnership was dissolved, and the units of the Operating Partnership owned by the Tanger Family Limited Partnership were distributed to the individual beneficial owners of the Tanger Family Limited Partnership. As a result, each such individual beneficial owner became an individual limited partner of the Operating Partnership (collectively the "Family Limited Partners").
As of March 31, 2013, the Company, through its ownership of Tanger GP Trust and Tanger LP Trust, owned 23,603,784 units of the Operating Partnership and the Family Limited Partners collectively owned 1,186,921 units. Each unit held by the Family Limited Partners is exchangeable for four of the Company's common shares, subject to certain limitations to preserve the Company's REIT status. Prior to the Company's 2 for 1 splits of its common shares on December 28, 2004 and January 24, 2011, the exchange ratio was one for one.
Management operates the Company and the Operating Partnership as one enterprise. The management of the Company consists of the same members as the management of the Operating Partnership. These individuals are officers of the Company and employees of the Operating Partnership. The individuals that comprise the Company's Board of Directors are also the same individuals that make up the Tanger GP Trust's Board of Trustees.
We believe combining the quarterly reports on Form 10-Q of the Company and the Operating Partnership into this single report results in the following benefits:

• | enhancing investors' understanding of the Company and the Operating Partnership by enabling investors to view the business as a whole in the same manner as management views and operates the business;

• | eliminating duplicative disclosure and providing a more streamlined and readable presentation since a substantial portion of the disclosure applies to both the Company and the Operating Partnership; and

• | creating time and cost efficiencies through the preparation of one combined report instead of two separate reports.

3

There are a few differences between the Company and the Operating Partnership, which are reflected in the disclosure in this report. We believe it is important to understand the differences between the Company and the Operating Partnership in the context of how the Company and the Operating Partnership operate as an interrelated consolidated company. As stated above, the Company is a REIT, whose only material asset is its ownership of partnership interests of the Operating Partnership through its wholly-owned subsidiaries, Tanger GP Trust and Tanger LP Trust. As a result, the Company does not conduct business itself, other than issuing public equity from time to time and incurring expenses required to operate as a public company. However, all operating expenses incurred by the Company are reimbursed by the Operating Partnership, thus the only material item on the Company's income statement is its equity in the earnings of the Operating Partnership. Therefore, the assets and liabilities and the revenues and expenses of the Company and the Operating Partnership are the same on their respective financial statements, except for immaterial differences related to cash, other assets and accrued liabilities that arise from public company expenses paid by the Company. The Company itself does not hold any indebtedness but does guarantee certain debt of the Operating Partnership, as disclosed in this report. The Operating Partnership holds substantially all the assets of the Company and holds the ownership interests in the Company's consolidated and unconsolidated joint ventures. The Operating Partnership conducts the operations of the business and is structured as a partnership with no publicly traded equity. Except for net proceeds from public equity issuances by the Company, which are required to be contributed to the Operating Partnership in exchange for partnership units, the Operating Partnership generates the capital required through its operations, its incurrence of indebtedness or through the issuance of partnership units.
Noncontrolling interests, shareholder's equity and partners' capital are the main areas of difference between the consolidated financial statements of the Company and those of the Operating Partnership. The limited partnership interests in the Operating Partnership held by the Family Limited Partners are accounted for as partners' capital in the Operating Partnership's financial statements and as noncontrolling interests in the Company's financial statements.
To help investors understand the significant differences between the Company and the Operating Partnership, this report presents the following separate sections for each of the Company and the Operating Partnership:

• | Consolidated financial statements;

• | The following notes to the consolidated financial statements:

• | Debt of the Company and the Operating Partnership;

• | Shareholders' Equity and Partners' Equity;

• | Share-Based Compensation of the Company and Equity-Based Compensation of the Operating Partnership;

• | Earnings Per Share and Earnings Per Unit;

• | Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income of the Company and the Operating Partnership

• | Liquidity and Capital Resources in the Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

4

This report also includes separate Item 4. Controls and Procedures sections and separate Exhibit 31 and 32 certifications for each of the Company and the Operating Partnership in order to establish that the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of each entity have made the requisite certifications and that the Company and Operating Partnership are compliant with Rule 13a-15 or Rule 15d-15 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C. §1350.
In order to highlight the differences between the Company and the Operating Partnership, the separate sections in this report for the Company and the Operating Partnership specifically refer to the Company and the Operating Partnership. In the sections that combine disclosure of the Company and the Operating Partnership, this report refers to actions or holdings as being actions or holdings of the Company. Although the Operating Partnership is generally the entity that enters into contracts and joint ventures and holds assets and debt, reference to the Company is appropriate because the business is one enterprise and the Company operates the business through the Operating Partnership.
As the 100% owner of Tanger GP Trust, the general partner with control of the Operating Partnership, the Company consolidates the Operating Partnership for financial reporting purposes. The separate discussions of the Company and the Operating Partnership in this report should be read in conjunction with each other to understand the results of the Company on a consolidated basis and how management operates the Company.
5

TANGER FACTORY OUTLET CENTERS, INC. AND TANGER PROPERTIES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
Index

| Page Number
Part I. Financial Information
Item 1. |
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF TANGER FACTORY OUTLET CENTERS, INC. (Unaudited) |
Consolidated Balance Sheets - as of March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012 | 7
Consolidated Statements of Operations - for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012 | 8
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income - for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012 | 9
Consolidated Statements of Equity - for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and the year ended December 31, 2012 | 10
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows - for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012 | 12
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF TANGER PROPERTIES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP (Unaudited) |
Consolidated Balance Sheets - as of March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012 | 13
Consolidated Statements of Operations - for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012 | 14
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income - for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012 | 15
Consolidated Statements of Equity - for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and the year ended December 31, 2012 | 16
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows - for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012 | 17
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements of Tanger Factory Outlet Centers, Inc. and Tanger Properties Limited Partnership | 18
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations | 30
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk | 47
Item 4. Controls and Procedures (Tanger Factory Outlet Centers, Inc. and Tanger Properties Limited Partnership) | 47
Part II. Other Information
Item 1. Legal Proceedings | 48
Item 1A. Risk Factors | 48
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosure | 48
Item 6. Exhibits | 49
Signatures | 50

6

PART I. - FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1 - Financial Statements of Tanger Factory Outlet Centers, Inc.
TANGER FACTORY OUTLET CENTERS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands, except share and per share data, unaudited)

|  | March 31, 2013 |  | December 31, 2012
ASSETS |  |  |  |  |  |
Rental property |  |  |  |  |  |
Land |  | $ | 148,002 |  |  | $ | 148,002 |
Buildings, improvements and fixtures |  | 1,802,160 |  |  | 1,796,042 |
Construction in progress |  | 6,336 |  |  | 3,308 |
|  | 1,956,498 |  |  | 1,947,352 |
Accumulated depreciation |  | (600,713 | ) |  | (582,859 | )
Total rental property, net |  | 1,355,785 |  |  | 1,364,493 |
Cash and cash equivalents |  | 2,691 |  |  | 10,335 |
Investments in unconsolidated joint ventures |  | 133,982 |  |  | 126,632 |
Deferred lease costs and other intangibles, net |  | 97,328 |  |  | 101,040 |
Deferred debt origination costs, net |  | 8,534 |  |  | 9,083 |
Prepaids and other assets |  | 63,353 |  |  | 60,842 |
Total assets |  | $ | 1,661,673 |  |  | $ | 1,672,425 |
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY |  |  |  |
Liabilities |  |  |  |  |  |
Debt |  |  |  |  |  |
Senior, unsecured notes (net of discount of $1,897 and $1,967, respectively) |  | $ | 548,103 |  |  | $ | 548,033 |
Unsecured term loans (net of discount of $509 and $547, respectively) |  | 259,491 |  |  | 259,453 |
Mortgages payable (including premiums of $6,085 and $6,362, respectively) |  | 105,346 |  |  | 107,745 |
Unsecured lines of credit |  | 174,917 |  |  | 178,306 |
Total debt |  | 1,087,857 |  |  | 1,093,537 |
Construction trade payables |  | 7,744 |  |  | 7,084 |
Accounts payable and accrued expenses |  | 37,957 |  |  | 41,149 |
Other liabilities |  | 16,676 |  |  | 16,780 |
Total liabilities |  | 1,150,234 |  |  | 1,158,550 |
Commitments and contingencies |  |  |  |  |  |
Equity |  |  |  |  |  |
Tanger Factory Outlet Centers, Inc. |  |  |  |  |  |
Common shares, $.01 par value, 300,000,000 shares authorized, 94,415,137 and 94,061,384 shares issued and outstanding at March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively |  | 944 |  |  | 941 |
Paid in capital |  | 768,702 |  |  | 766,056 |
Accumulated distributions in excess of net income |  | (289,880 | ) |  | (285,588 | )
Accumulated other comprehensive income |  | 1,179 |  |  | 1,200 |
Equity attributable to Tanger Factory Outlet Centers, Inc. |  | 480,945 |  |  | 482,609 |
Equity attributable to noncontrolling interests |  |  |  |
Noncontrolling interests in Operating Partnership |  | 24,184 |  |  | 24,432 |
Noncontrolling interests in other consolidated partnerships |  | 6,310 |  |  | 6,834 |
Total equity |  | 511,439 |  |  | 513,875 |
Total liabilities and equity |  | $ | 1,661,673 |  |  | $ | 1,672,425 |

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
7

TANGER FACTORY OUTLET CENTERS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(In thousands, except per share data, unaudited)

|  | Three months ended March 31,
|  | 2013 |  | 2012
Revenues |  |  |  |
Base rentals |  | $ | 59,244 |  |  | $ | 57,219 |
Percentage rentals |  | 2,017 |  |  | 1,744 |
Expense reimbursements |  | 25,306 |  |  | 23,673 |
Other income |  | 2,122 |  |  | 1,607 |
Total revenues |  | 88,689 |  |  | 84,243 |
Expenses |  |  |  |  |
Property operating |  | 28,135 |  |  | 26,088 |
General and administrative |  | 9,572 |  |  | 10,020 |
Acquisition costs |  | 179 |  |  | — |
Depreciation and amortization |  | 22,288 |  |  | 25,515 |
Total expenses |  | 60,174 |  |  | 61,623 |
Operating income |  | 28,515 |  |  | 22,620 |
Interest expense |  | 12,876 |  |  | 12,334 |
Income before equity in earnings (losses) of unconsolidated joint ventures |  | 15,639 |  |  | 10,286 |
Equity in earnings (losses) of unconsolidated joint ventures |  | 590 |  |  | (1,452 | )
Net income |  | 16,229 |  |  | 8,834 |
Noncontrolling interests in Operating Partnership |  | (789 | ) |  | (713 | )
Noncontrolling interests in other consolidated partnerships |  | (1 | ) |  | 7 |
Net income attributable to Tanger Factory Outlet Centers, Inc. |  | $ | 15,439 |  |  | $ | 8,128 |
Basic earnings per common share |  |  |  |
Net income |  | $ | 0.16 |  |  | $ | 0.09 |
Diluted earnings per common share |  |  |  |
Net income |  | $ | 0.16 |  |  | $ | 0.09 |
Dividends paid per common share |  | $ | 0.21 |  |  | $ | 0.20 |

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
8

TANGER FACTORY OUTLET CENTERS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(In thousands, unaudited)

|  | Three months ended March 31,
|  | 2013 |  | 2012
Net income |  | $ | 16,229 |  |  | $ | 8,834 |
Other comprehensive loss |  |  |  |
Reclassification adjustment for amortization of gain on settlement of US treasury rate lock included in net income |  | (90 | ) |  | (86 | )
Foreign currency translation adjustments |  | 68 |  |  | (6 | )
Other comprehensive loss |  | (22 | ) |  | (92 | )
Comprehensive income |  | 16,207 |  |  | 8,742 |
Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests |  | (789 | ) |  | (700 | )
Comprehensive income attributable to Tanger Factory Outlet Centers, Inc. |  | $ | 15,418 |  |  | $ | 8,042 |

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
9

TANGER FACTORY OUTLET CENTERS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EQUITY
(In thousands, except share and per share data, unaudited)

|  | Common shares | Paid in capital | Accumulated distributions in excess of earnings | Accumulated other comprehensive income | Total Tanger Factory Outlet Centers, Inc. equity | Noncontrolling interests in Operating Partnership | Noncontrolling interests in other consolidated partnerships | Total equity
Balance, December 31, 2011 |  | $ | 867 |  | $ | 720,073 |  | $ | (261,913 | ) | $ | 1,535 |  | $ | 460,562 |  | $ | 61,027 |  | $ | 6,843 |  | $ | 528,432 |
Net income |  | — |  | — |  | 53,228 |  | — |  | 53,228 |  | 3,267 |  | (19 | ) | 56,476 |
Other comprehensive loss |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | (335 | ) | (335 | ) | (21 | ) | — |  | (356 | )
Compensation under Incentive Award Plan |  | — |  | 10,676 |  | — |  | — |  | 10,676 |  | — |  | — |  | 10,676 |
Issuance of 37,700 common shares upon exercise of options |  | — |  | 481 |  | — |  | — |  | 481 |  | — |  | — |  | 481 |
Grant of 566,000 restricted shares, net of forfeitures |  | 6 |  | (6 | ) | — |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | — |
Adjustment for noncontrolling interests in Operating Partnership |  | — |  | 34,910 |  | — |  | — |  | 34,910 |  | (34,910 | ) | — |  | — |
Adjustment for noncontrolling interests in other consolidated partnerships |  | — |  | (10 | ) | — |  | — |  | (10 | ) | — |  | 10 |  | — |
Exchange of 1,682,507 Operating Partnership units for 6,730,028 common shares |  | 68 |  | (68 | ) | — |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | — |
Common dividends ($0.8300 per share) |  | — |  | — |  | (76,903 | ) | — |  | (76,903 | ) | — |  | — |  | (76,903 | )
Distributions to noncontrolling interest in Operating Partnership |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | (4,931 | ) | — |  | (4,931 | )
Balance, December 31, 2012 |  | $ | 941 |  | $ | 766,056 |  | $ | (285,588 | ) | $ | 1,200 |  | $ | 482,609 |  | $ | 24,432 |  | $ | 6,834 |  | $ | 513,875 |

10

TANGER FACTORY OUTLET CENTERS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EQUITY (In thousands, except share and per share data, unaudited) (Continued)
|  | Common shares | Paid in capital | Accumulated distributions in excess of earnings | Accumulated other comprehensive income | Total Tanger Factory Outlet Centers, Inc. equity | Noncontrolling interests in Operating Partnership | Noncontrolling interests in other consolidated partnerships | Total equity
Balance, December 31, 2012 |  | $ | 941 |  | $ | 766,056 |  | $ | (285,588 | ) | $ | 1,200 |  | $ | 482,609 |  | $ | 24,432 |  | $ | 6,834 |  | $ | 513,875 |
Net income |  | — |  | — |  | 15,439 |  | — |  | 15,439 |  | 789 |  | 1 |  | 16,229 |
Other comprehensive loss |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | (21 | ) | (21 | ) | (1 | ) | — |  | (22 | )
Compensation under Incentive Award Plan |  | — |  | 2,496 |  | — |  | — |  | 2,496 |  | — |  | — |  | 2,496 |
Issuance of 7,200 common shares upon exercise of options |  | — |  | 117 |  | — |  | — |  | 117 |  | — |  | — |  | 117 |
Grant of 337,373 restricted shares, net of forfeitures |  | 3 |  | (3 | ) | — |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | — |
Adjustment for noncontrolling interests in Operating Partnership |  | — |  | 36 |  | — |  | — |  | 36 |  | (36 | ) | — |  | — |
Acquisition of noncontrolling interests in other consolidated partnerships |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | (525 | ) | (525 | )
Exchange of 3,545 Operating Partnership units for 14,180 common shares |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | — |
Common dividends ($.21 per share) |  | — |  | — |  | (19,731 | ) | — |  | (19,731 | ) | — |  | — |  | (19,731 | )
Distributions to noncontrolling interests in Operating Partnership |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | (1,000 | ) | — |  | (1,000 | )
Balance, March 31, 2013 |  | $ | 944 |  | $ | 768,702 |  | $ | (289,880 | ) | $ | 1,179 |  | $ | 480,945 |  | $ | 24,184 |  | $ | 6,310 |  | $ | 511,439 |

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
11

TANGER FACTORY OUTLET CENTERS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands, unaudited)

|  | Three months ended March 31,
|  | 2013 |  | 2012
OPERATING ACTIVITIES |  |  |  |  |
Net income |  | $ | 16,229 |  |  | $ | 8,834 |
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: |  |  |  |
Depreciation and amortization |  | 22,288 |  |  | 25,515 |
Amortization of deferred financing costs |  | 603 |  |  | 561 |
Equity in (earnings) losses of unconsolidated joint ventures |  | (590 | ) |  | 1,452 |
Distributions of cumulative earnings from unconsolidated joint ventures |  | 293 |  |  | 237 |
Share-based compensation expense |  | 2,460 |  |  | 3,391 |
Amortization of debt (premiums) and discounts, net |  | (259 | ) |  | (248 | )
Net accretion of market rent rate adjustments |  | (27 | ) |  | (234 | )
Straight-line rent adjustments |  | (1,088 | ) |  | (997 | )
Changes in other assets and liabilities: |  |  |  |
Other assets |  | (1,313 | ) |  | (1,287 | )
Accounts payable and accrued expenses |  | (3,305 | ) |  | 5,373 |
Net cash provided by operating activities |  | 35,291 |  |  | 42,597 |
INVESTING ACTIVITIES |  |  |  |
Additions to rental property |  | (8,495 | ) |  | (8,335 | )
Additions to investments in unconsolidated joint ventures |  | (9,751 | ) |  | (21,371 | )
Distributions in excess of cumulative earnings from unconsolidated joint ventures |  | 1,221 |  |  | 63 |
Additions to deferred lease costs |  | (648 | ) |  | (1,329 | )
Net cash used in investing activities |  | (17,673 | ) |  | (30,972 | )
FINANCING ACTIVITIES |  |  |  |
Cash dividends paid |  | (19,731 | ) |  | (18,156 | )
Distributions to noncontrolling interests in Operating Partnership |  | (1,000 | ) |  | (1,488 | )
Proceeds from debt issuances |  | 80,246 |  |  | 341,781 |
Repayments of debt |  | (84,313 | ) |  | (328,432 | )
Acquisition of noncontrolling interests in other consolidated partnerships |  | (525 | ) |  | — |
Additions to deferred financing costs |  | (56 | ) |  | (2,483 | )
Proceeds from exercise of options |  | 117 |  |  | 46 |
Net cash used in financing activities |  | (25,262 | ) |  | (8,732 | )
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |  | (7,644 | ) |  | 2,893 |
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period |  | 10,335 |  |  | 7,894 |
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period |  | $ | 2,691 |  |  | $ | 10,787 |

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
12

Item 1 - Financial Statements of Tanger Properties Limited Partnership
TANGER PROPERTIES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands, unaudited)

|  | March 31, 2013 |  | December 31, 2012
ASSETS |  |  |  |  |  |
Rental property |  |  |  |  |  |
Land |  | $ | 148,002 |  |  | $ | 148,002 |
Buildings, improvements and fixtures |  | 1,802,160 |  |  | 1,796,042 |
Construction in progress |  | 6,336 |  |  | 3,308 |
|  | 1,956,498 |  |  | 1,947,352 |
Accumulated depreciation |  | (600,713 | ) |  | (582,859 | )
Total rental property, net |  | 1,355,785 |  |  | 1,364,493 |
Cash and cash equivalents |  | 2,612 |  |  | 10,295 |
Investments in unconsolidated joint ventures |  | 133,982 |  |  | 126,632 |
Deferred lease costs and other intangibles, net |  | 97,328 |  |  | 101,040 |
Deferred debt origination costs, net |  | 8,534 |  |  | 9,083 |
Prepaids and other assets |  | 62,832 |  |  | 60,408 |
Total assets |  | $ | 1,661,073 |  |  | $ | 1,671,951 |
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY |  |  |  |
Liabilities |  |  |  |
Debt |  |  |  |
Senior, unsecured notes (net of discount of $1,897 and $1,967, respectively) |  | $ | 548,103 |  |  | $ | 548,033 |
Unsecured term loans (net of discount of $509 and $547, respectively) |  | 259,491 |  |  | 259,453 |
Mortgages payable (including premiums of $6,085 and $6,362, respectively) |  | 105,346 |  |  | 107,745 |
Unsecured lines of credit |  | 174,917 |  |  | 178,306 |
Total debt |  | 1,087,857 |  |  | 1,093,537 |
Construction trade payables |  | 7,744 |  |  | 7,084 |
Accounts payable and accrued expenses |  | 37,357 |  |  | 40,675 |
Other liabilities |  | 16,676 |  |  | 16,780 |
Total liabilities |  | 1,149,634 |  |  | 1,158,076 |
Commitments and contingencies |  |  |  |  |  |
Equity |  |  |  |
Partners' Equity |  |  |  |
General partner |  | 4,676 |  |  | 4,720 |
Limited partners |  | 499,368 |  |  | 501,214 |
Accumulated other comprehensive income |  | 1,085 |  |  | 1,107 |
Total partners' equity |  | 505,129 |  |  | 507,041 |
Noncontrolling interests in consolidated partnerships |  | 6,310 |  |  | 6,834 |
Total equity |  | 511,439 |  |  | 513,875 |
Total liabilities and equity |  | $ | 1,661,073 |  |  | $ | 1,671,951 |

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
13

TANGER PROPERITES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(In thousands, except per unit data, unaudited)

|  | Three months ended March 31,
|  | 2013 |  | 2012
Revenues |  |  |  |
Base rentals |  | $ | 59,244 |  |  | $ | 57,219 |
Percentage rentals |  | 2,017 |  |  | 1,744 |
Expense reimbursements |  | 25,306 |  |  | 23,673 |
Other income |  | 2,122 |  |  | 1,607 |
Total revenues |  | 88,689 |  |  | 84,243 |
Expenses |  |  |  |  |  |
Property operating |  | 28,135 |  |  | 26,088 |
General and administrative |  | 9,572 |  |  | 10,020 |
Acquisition costs |  | 179 |  |  | — |
Depreciation and amortization |  | 22,288 |  |  | 25,515 |
Total expenses |  | 60,174 |  |  | 61,623 |
Operating income |  | 28,515 |  |  | 22,620 |
Interest expense |  | 12,876 |  |  | 12,334 |
Income before equity in earnings (losses) of unconsolidated joint ventures |  | 15,639 |  |  | 10,286 |
Equity in earnings (losses) of unconsolidated joint ventures |  | 590 |  |  | (1,452 | )
Net income |  | 16,229 |  |  | 8,834 |
Noncontrolling interests in consolidated partnerships |  | (1 | ) |  | 7 |
Net income available to partners |  | 16,228 |  |  | 8,841 |
Net income available to limited partners |  | 16,062 |  |  | 8,750 |
Net income available to general partner |  | $ | 166 |  |  | $ | 91 |
Basic earnings per common unit: |  |  |  |
Net income |  | $ | 0.66 |  |  | $ | 0.36 |
Diluted earnings per common unit: |  |  |  |
Net income |  | $ | 0.65 |  |  | $ | 0.35 |
Distribution paid per common unit |  | $ | 0.84 |  |  | $ | 0.80 |

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
14

TANGER PROPERITES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(In thousands, unaudited)

|  | Three months ended March 31,
|  | 2013 |  | 2012
Net income |  | $ | 16,229 |  |  | $ | 8,834 |
Other comprehensive loss |  |  |  |
Reclassification adjustment for amortization of gain on settlement of US treasury rate lock included in net income |  | (90 | ) |  | (86 | )
Foreign currency translation adjustments |  | 68 |  |  | (6 | )
Other comprehensive loss |  | (22 | ) |  | (92 | )
Comprehensive income |  | 16,207 |  |  | 8,742 |
Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests in consolidated partnerships |  | 1 |  |  | 7 |
Comprehensive income attributable to the Operating Partnership |  | $ | 16,208 |  |  | $ | 8,749 |

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
15

TANGER PROPERITES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EQUITY
(In thousands, except unit and per unit data, unaudited)

|  | General partner | Limited partners | Accumulated other comprehensive income | Total partners' equity | Noncontrolling interests in consolidated partnerships | Total equity
Balance, December 31, 2011 |  | $ | 4,972 |  | $ | 515,154 |  | $ | 1,463 |  | $ | 521,589 |  | $ | 6,843 |  | $ | 528,432 |
Net income |  | 578 |  | 55,917 |  | — |  | 56,495 |  | (19 | ) | 56,476 |
Other comprehensive loss |  | — |  | — |  | (356 | ) | (356 | ) | — |  | (356 | )
Compensation under Incentive Award Plan |  | — |  | 10,676 |  | — |  | 10,676 |  | — |  | 10,676 |
Issuance of 9,425 common units upon exercise of options |  | — |  | 481 |  | — |  | 481 |  | — |  | 481 |
Grant of 141,500 restricted units, net of forfeitures |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | — |
Adjustments for noncontrolling interests in consolidated partnerships |  | — |  | (10 | ) | — |  | (10 | ) | 10 |  | — |
Common distributions ($3.32 per common unit) |  | (830 | ) | (81,004 | ) | — |  | (81,834 | ) | — |  | (81,834 | )
Balance, December 31, 2012 |  | 4,720 |  | 501,214 |  | 1,107 |  | 507,041 |  | 6,834 |  | 513,875 |
Net income |  | 166 |  | 16,062 |  | — |  | 16,228 |  | 1 |  | 16,229 |
Other comprehensive loss |  | — |  | — |  | (22 | ) | (22 | ) | — |  | (22 | )
Compensation under Incentive Award Plan |  | — |  | 2,496 |  | — |  | 2,496 |  | — |  | 2,496 |
Issuance of 1,800 common units upon exercise of options |  | — |  | 117 |  | — |  | 117 |  | — |  | 117 |
Grant of 84,343 restricted units, net of forfeitures |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | — |
Acquisition of noncontrolling interests in other consolidated partnerships |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | (525 | ) | (525 | )
Common distributions ($.84 per common unit) |  | (210 | ) | (20,521 | ) | — |  | (20,731 | ) | — |  | (20,731 | )
Balance, March 31, 2013 |  | $ | 4,676 |  | $ | 499,368 |  | $ | 1,085 |  | $ | 505,129 |  | $ | 6,310 |  | $ | 511,439 |

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
16

TANGER PROPERTIES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands, unaudited)

|  | Three months ended March 31,
|  | 2013 |  | 2012
OPERATING ACTIVITIES |  |  |  |  |  |
Net income |  | $ | 16,229 |  |  | $ | 8,834 |
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: |  |  |  |  |
Depreciation and amortization |  | 22,288 |  |  | 25,515 |
Amortization of deferred financing costs |  | 603 |  |  | 561 |
Equity in (earnings) losses of unconsolidated joint ventures |  | (590 | ) |  | 1,452 |
Distributions of cumulative earnings from unconsolidated joint ventures |  | 293 |  |  | 237 |
Equity-based compensation expense |  | 2,460 |  |  | 3,391 |
Amortization of debt (premiums) and discounts, net |  | (259 | ) |  | (248 | )
Net accretion of market rent rate adjustments |  | (27 | ) |  | (234 | )
Straight-line rent adjustments |  | (1,088 | ) |  | (997 | )
Changes in other assets and liabilities: |  |  |  |
Other assets |  | (1,226 | ) |  | (1,072 | )
Accounts payable and accrued expenses |  | (3,431 | ) |  | 5,114 |
Net cash provided by operating activities |  | 35,252 |  |  | 42,553 |
INVESTING ACTIVITIES |  |  |  |
Additions to rental property |  | (8,495 | ) |  | (8,335 | )
Additions to investments in unconsolidated joint ventures |  | (9,751 | ) |  | (21,371 | )
Distributions in excess of cumulative earnings from unconsolidated joint ventures |  | 1,221 |  |  | 63 |
Additions to deferred lease costs |  | (648 | ) |  | (1,329 | )
Net cash used in investing activities |  | (17,673 | ) |  | (30,972 | )
FINANCING ACTIVITIES |  |  |  |
Cash distributions paid |  | (20,731 | ) |  | (19,644 | )
Proceeds from debt issuances |  | 80,246 |  |  | 341,781 |
Repayments of debt |  | (84,313 | ) |  | (328,432 | )
Acquisition of noncontrolling interests in other consolidated partnerships |  | (525 | ) |  | — |
Additions to deferred financing costs |  | (56 | ) |  | (2,483 | )
Proceeds from exercise of options |  | 117 |  |  | 46 |
Net cash used in financing activities |  | (25,262 | ) |  | (8,732 | )
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |  | (7,683 | ) |  | 2,849 |
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period |  | 10,295 |  |  | 7,866 |
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period |  | $ | 2,612 |  |  | $ | 10,715 |

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
17

TANGER FACTORY OUTLET CENTERS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
TANGER PROPERTIES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP AND SUBSIDIAIRES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. Business
Tanger Factory Outlet Centers, Inc. and subsidiaries is one of the largest owners and operators of outlet centers in the United States. We are a fully-integrated, self-administered and self-managed real estate investment trust ("REIT") which, through our controlling interest in the Operating Partnership, focuses exclusively on developing, acquiring, owning, operating and managing outlet shopping centers. As of March 31, 2013, we owned and operated 36 outlet centers, with a total gross leasable area of approximately 10.8 million square feet. We also had partial ownership interests in 7 outlet centers totaling approximately 2.1 million square feet, including 3 outlet centers in Canada.
Our outlet centers and other assets are held by, and all of our operations are conducted by, Tanger Properties Limited Partnership and subsidiaries. Accordingly, the descriptions of our business, employees and properties are also descriptions of the business, employees and properties of the Operating Partnership. Unless the context indicates otherwise, the term, "Company", refers to Tanger Factory Outlet Centers, Inc. and subsidiaries and the term, "Operating Partnership", refers to Tanger Properties Limited Partnership and subsidiaries. The terms "we", "our" and "us" refer to the Company or the Company and the Operating Partnership together, as the text requires.
The Company owns the majority of the units of partnership interest issued by the Operating Partnership through its two wholly-owned subsidiaries, Tanger GP Trust and Tanger LP Trust. Tanger GP Trust controls the Operating Partnership as its sole general partner. Tanger LP Trust holds a limited partnership interest. The Family Limited Partners own the remaining Operating Partnership units.
2. Basis of Presentation
The unaudited consolidated financial statements included herein have been prepared pursuant to accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto of the Company's and the Operating Partnership's combined Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012. The December 31, 2012 balance sheet data in this Form 10-Q was derived from audited financial statements. Certain information and note disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America have been condensed or omitted pursuant to the SEC's rules and regulations, although management believes that the disclosures are adequate to make the information presented not misleading.
Investments in real estate joint ventures that we do not control are accounted for using the equity method of accounting. These investments are recorded initially at cost and subsequently adjusted for our equity in the venture's net income (loss), cash contributions, distributions and other adjustments required under the equity method of accounting. These investments are evaluated for impairment when necessary. Control is determined using an evaluation based on accounting standards related to the consolidation of voting interest entities and variable interest entities. For joint ventures that are determined to be variable interest entities, the primary beneficiary consolidates the entity.
Noncontrolling interests relate to the interests in the Operating Partnership owned by Family Limited Partners and interests in consolidated partnerships not wholly-owned by the Company or the Operating Partnership. Family Limited Partners are holders of Operating Partnership units that may be exchanged for the Company's common shares in a ratio of one unit for four common shares. The noncontrolling interests in other consolidated partnerships consist of outside equity interests in partnerships not wholly owned by the Company or the Operating Partnership that are consolidated with the financial results of the Company and Operating Partnership because the Operating Partnership exercises control over the entities that own the properties.
Certain amounts related to reimbursements of payroll related expenses from unconsolidated joint ventures in the statement of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2012 have been reclassified to the caption “expense reimbursements” from the caption “other income” to conform to the presentation of the consolidated statement of operations presented for the three months ended March 31, 2013.
18

3. Investments in Unconsolidated Real Estate Joint Ventures
Our investments in unconsolidated joint ventures as of March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012 aggregated $134.0 million and $126.6 million, respectively. We have concluded based on the current facts and circumstances that the equity method of accounting should be used to account for each of the individual joint ventures below. At March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, we were members of the following unconsolidated real estate joint ventures:

As of March 31, 2013
Joint Venture |  | Center Location |  | Ownership % |  | Square Feet |  | Carrying Value of Investment (in millions) |  | Total Joint Venture Debt (in millions)
Deer Park |  | Deer Park, Long Island NY |  | 33.3 | % |  | 741,981 |  |  | $ | 2.4 |  |  | $ | 246.9 |
Galveston/Houston |  | Texas City, Texas |  | 50.0 | % |  | 352,705 |  |  | 39.8 |  |  | — |
National Harbor |  | Washington D.C. Metro Area |  | 50.0 | % |  | — |  |  | 2.6 |  |  | — |
RioCan Canada |  | Various |  | 50.0 | % |  | 434,562 |  |  | 66.8 |  |  | 19.5 |
Westgate |  | Glendale, Arizona |  | 58.0 | % |  | 332,234 |  |  | 19.6 |  |  | 38.6 |
Wisconsin Dells |  | Wisconsin Dells, Wisconsin |  | 50.0 | % |  | 265,086 |  |  | 2.6 |  |  | 24.3 |
Other |  |  |  |  |  |  | — |  |  | 0.2 |  |  | — |
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  | $ | 134.0 |  |  | $ | 329.3 |

As of December 31, 2012
Joint Venture |  | Center Location |  | Ownership % |  | Square Feet |  | Carrying Value of Investment (in millions) |  | Total Joint Venture Debt (in millions)
Deer Park |  | Deer Park, Long Island NY |  | 33.3 | % |  | 741,981 |  |  | $ | 3.0 |  |  | $ | 246.9 |
Deer Park Warehouse |  | Deer Park, Long Island NY |  | 33.3 | % |  | 29,253 |  |  | — |  |  | 1.9 |
Galveston/Houston |  | Texas City, TX |  | 50.0 | % |  | 352,705 |  |  | 36.7 |  |  | — |
National Harbor |  | Washington D.C. Metro Area |  | 50.0 | % |  | — |  |  | 2.6 |  |  | — |
RioCan Canada |  | Various |  | 50.0 | % |  | 434,562 |  |  | 62.2 |  |  | 20.1 |
Westgate |  | Glendale, AZ |  | 58.0 | % |  | 332,234 |  |  | 19.1 |  |  | 32.0 |
Wisconsin Dells |  | Wisconsin Dells, WI |  | 50.0 | % |  | 265,086 |  |  | 2.8 |  |  | 24.3 |
Other |  |  |  |  |  | — |  |  | 0.2 |  |  | — |
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  | $ | 126.6 |  |  | $ | 325.2 |

These investments are recorded initially at cost and subsequently adjusted for our equity in the venture's net income (loss), cash contributions, distributions and other adjustments required by the equity method of accounting as described below.
19

The following management, development, leasing and marketing fees were recognized from services provided to our unconsolidated joint ventures (in thousands):

|  | Three months ended March 31,
|  | 2013 |  | 2012
Fee: |  |  |  |
Development |  | $ | 71 |  |  | $ | — |
Loan Guarantee |  | 40 |  |  | — |
Management and leasing |  | 844 |  |  | 479 |
Marketing |  | 110 |  |  | 53 |
Total Fees |  | $ | 1,065 |  |  | $ | 532 |

Our investments in real estate joint ventures are reduced by the percentage of the profits earned for leasing and development services associated with our ownership interest in each joint venture. Our carrying value of investments in unconsolidated joint ventures differs from our share of the assets reported in the "Summary Balance Sheets - Unconsolidated Joint Ventures" shown below due to adjustments to the book basis, including intercompany profits on sales of services that are capitalized by the unconsolidated joint ventures. The differences in basis are amortized over the various useful lives of the related assets.
Deer Park, Long Island, New York
In December 2011, the joint venture refinanced its mortgage and mezzanine loans, totaling $246.9 million. The non-default interest rates for the mortgage and mezzanine loans are LIBOR + 3.50% and LIBOR + 5.00%, respectively and both loans mature on May 17, 2014. The loans require certain financial covenants, such as debt service coverage and loan to value ratios, to be met at various measurement dates. Based on the administrative agent bank's calculation of Deer Park's debt service coverage ratio utilizing financial information as of December 31, 2012, the joint venture was not in compliance with the coverage ratio. As a result, on March 22, 2013, the lender group placed Deer Park in default. The lenders have advised the joint venture that a principal payment of approximately $14.2 million would satisfy the debt service coverage test. Such principal payment would require additional capital contributions to Deer Park by its partners. Deer Park does not agree with the lender's principal payment computation and believes the principal payment required could be substantially less. As a result, no capital contributions have been authorized by the managing member of Deer Park. The managing member continues to work with the administrative agent bank of the lender group to negotiate a resolution. The lenders have also notified Deer Park that the default interest rates will continue to accrue until the default is cured. The default interest rates for the mortgage and mezzanine loans are PRIME + 7.5% and LIBOR + 9%, respectively.
The Company and its two joint venture partners have each, jointly and severally, guaranteed the payment of interest (but not principal) on the loans. The operations from Deer Park, together with cash on hand in the joint venture, have been sufficient in the past to pay interest on the loans, although the historical operations would not have generated sufficient cash flow to pay fully the monthly interest at the additional default interest rate.
In addition, the managing member delivered to us a revocable notice of termination of our property management agreement with Deer Park that purports to be effective September 1, 2013. We believe the decision to terminate was improper and we continue to manage the property. We are in discussions with our partners on these management issues as well as the matters with the lenders described above. There can be no assurance that we will be able to resolve these matters on favorable terms.
Deer Park Warehouse, Long Island, New York
In March 2013, in connection with the Loan Forbearance Agreement signed in 2012 with the lender to the joint venture, the warehouse property was sold for approximately $1.2 million. The proceeds were used to satisfy the terms of the forbearance agreement. There was no impact to the net income of the joint venture as a result of this sale and the retirement of the associated mortgage debt.
20

National Harbor, Washington, D.C. Metro Area
In May 2011, we announced the formation of a joint venture for the development of a Tanger Outlet Center at National Harbor in the Washington, D.C. Metro area. The planned Tanger Outlet Center is expected to contain approximately 80 brand name and designer outlet stores in a center measuring up to 340,000 square feet. In November 2012, the joint venture broke ground and began site development. Both parties have made initial equity contributions of $2.6 million to fund certain pre-development costs. In February 2013, the joint venture executed a term sheet for a three year construction loan with the ability to borrow up to $61.0 million, which carries an interest rate of LIBOR + 1.65%. We will provide property management, leasing and marketing services to the joint venture; and with our partner, will jointly provide site development and construction supervision services.
RioCan Canada
In March of 2013 the RioCan Joint Venture acquired the land adjacent to the existing Cookstown Outlet Mall for $13.9 million. The land purchase will be used as the site for the joint venture's expansion of the Cookstown Outlet Mall which we expect to begin during the second quarter of 2013.
We evaluate our real estate joint ventures in accordance with the Consolidation guidance of the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC"). As a result of our qualitative assessment, we concluded that our Westgate and Deer Park joint ventures are Variable Interest Entities ("VIEs") and all of our other joint ventures are not VIEs. Westgate is considered a VIE because the voting rights are disproportionate to the economic interests. Deer Park is considered a VIE because it does not meet the criteria of the members having a sufficient equity investment at risk. Investments in real estate joint ventures in which we have a non-controlling ownership interest are accounted for using the equity method of accounting.
After making the determination that Westgate and Deer Park were VIEs, we performed an assessment to determine if we would be considered the primary beneficiary and thus be required to consolidate their balance sheets and results of operations. This assessment was based upon whether we had the following:

a. | The power to direct the activities of the VIE that most significantly impact the entity's economic performance

b. | The obligation to absorb losses of the entity that could potentially be significant to the VIE or the right to receive benefits from the entity that could potentially be significant to the VIE

The operating, development, leasing, and management agreements of Westgate and Deer Park provide that the activities that most significantly impact the economic performance of the ventures require either unanimous consent or, for certain activities related to Deer Park, majority consent. Accordingly, we determined that we do not have the power to direct the significant activities that affect the economic performance of the ventures and therefore, have applied the equity method of accounting for both Westgate and Deer Park. Our equity method investments in Westgate and Deer Park as of March 31, 2013 were approximately $19.6 million and $2.4 million, respectively. We are unable to estimate our maximum exposure to loss at this time because our guarantees are limited and based on the future operating performance of Westgate and Deer Park.
21

Condensed combined summary financial information of unconsolidated joint ventures accounted for using the equity method is as follows (in thousands):

Summary Balance Sheets - Unconsolidated Joint Ventures |  | March 31, 2013 |  | December 31, 2012
Assets |  |  |  |  |  |
Land |  | $ | 95,748 |  |  | $ | 96,455 |
Buildings, improvements and fixtures |  | 495,958 |  |  | 493,424 |
Construction in progress, including land |  | 21,974 |  |  | 16,338 |
|  | 613,680 |  |  | 606,217 |
Accumulated depreciation |  | (68,667 | ) |  | (62,547 | )
Total rental property, net |  | 545,013 |  |  | 543,670 |
Assets held for sale (1) |  | — |  |  | 1,828 |
Cash and cash equivalents |  | 20,531 |  |  | 21,879 |
Deferred lease costs, net |  | 23,080 |  |  | 24,411 |
Deferred debt origination costs, net |  | 4,399 |  |  | 5,213 |
Prepaids and other assets |  | 24,900 |  |  | 25,350 |
Total assets |  | $ | 617,923 |  |  | $ | 622,351 |
Liabilities and Owners' Equity |  |  |  |  |  |
Mortgages payable |  | $ | 329,262 |  |  | $ | 325,192 |
Construction trade payables |  | 14,232 |  |  | 21,734 |
Accounts payable and other liabilities |  | 16,726 |  |  | 31,944 |
Total liabilities |  | 360,220 |  |  | 378,870 |
Owners' equity |  | 257,703 |  |  | 243,481 |
Total liabilities and owners' equity |  | $ | 617,923 |  |  | $ | 622,351 |

(1) Assets related to our Deer Park Warehouse joint venture that were sold in March 2013.

|  | Three months ended
Summary Statements of Operations |  | March 31,
- Unconsolidated Joint Ventures |  | 2013 |  | 2012
Revenues |  | $ | 21,395 |  |  | $ | 11,658 |
Expenses |  |  |  |  |
Property operating |  | 8,803 |  |  | 4,891 |
General and administrative |  | 485 |  |  | 163 |
Acquisition costs |  | 421 |  |  | 704 |
Abandoned development costs |  | — |  |  | 954 |
Depreciation and amortization |  | 7,384 |  |  | 4,608 |
Total expenses |  | 17,093 |  |  | 11,320 |
Operating income |  | 4,302 |  |  | 338 |
Interest expense |  | 4,052 |  |  | 3,829 |
Net income (loss) |  | $ | 250 |  |  | $ | (3,491 | )
The Company and Operating Partnership's share of:
Net income (loss) |  | $ | 590 |  |  | $ | (1,452 | )
Depreciation and impairment charge (real estate related) |  | $ | 3,173 |  |  | $ | 1,815 |

22

4. Debt of the Company
All of the Company's debt is held directly by the Operating Partnership.
The Company guarantees the Opera ting Partnership's obligations with respect to its unsecured lines of credit which have a total borrowing capacity of $520.0 million. As of March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, the Operating Partnership had amounts outstanding on these lines totaling $174.9 million and $178.3 million, respect ively.
The Company also guarantees the Operating Partnership's unsecured term loan in the amount of $250.0 million as well as its obligation with respect to the mortgage assumed in connection with the acquisition of the outlet center in Ocean City, Maryland in July 2011.
5. Debt of the Operating Partnership
The debt of the Operating Partnership consisted of the following (in thousands):

|  |  |  |  |  | As of |  | As of
|  |  |  |  |  | March 31, 2013 |  | December 31, 2012
|  | Stated Interest Rate(s) |  | Maturity Date |  | Principal |  | Premium (Discount) |  | Principal |  | Premium (Discount)
Senior, unsecured notes: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Senior notes |  | 6.15 | % |  | November 2015 |  | $ | 250,000 |  |  | $ | (291 | ) |  | $ | 250,000 |  |  | $ | (317 | )
Senior notes |  | 6.125 | % |  | June 2020 |  | 300,000 |  |  | (1,606 | ) |  | 300,000 |  |  | (1,650 | )
Mortgages payable (1): |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Atlantic City |  | 5.14%-7.65% |  |  | November 2021- December 2026 |  | 50,346 |  |  | 4,385 |  |  | 52,212 |  |  | 4,495 |
Ocean City |  | 5.24 | % |  | January 2016 |  | 18,451 |  |  | 263 |  |  | 18,540 |  |  | 285 |
Hershey |  | 5.17%-8.00% |  |  | August 2015 |  | 30,464 |  |  | 1,437 |  |  | 30,631 |  |  | 1,581 |
Note payable (1) |  | 1.50 | % |  | June 2016 |  | 10,000 |  |  | (509 | ) |  | 10,000 |  |  | (546 | )
Unsecured term loan (2) |  | LIBOR + 1.80% |  |  | February 2019 |  | 250,000 |  |  | — |  |  | 250,000 |  |  | — |
Unsecured lines of credit (3) |  | LIBOR + 1.25% |  |  | November 2015 |  | 174,917 |  |  | — |  |  | 178,306 |  |  | — |
|  |  |  |  |  | $ | 1,084,178 |  |  | $ | 3,679 |  |  | $ | 1,089,689 |  |  | $ | 3,848 |

(1) | The effective interest rates assigned during the purchase price allocation to these assumed mortgages and note payable during acquisitions in 2011 were as follows: Atlantic City 5.05%, Ocean City 4.68%, Hershey 3.40% and note payable 3.15%.

(2) | Our unsecured term loan is pre-payable without penalty beginning in February of 2015.

(3) | Our unsecured lines of credit as of March 31, 2013 bear interest at a rate of LIBOR + 1.25% and expire on November 10, 2015. We have the option to extend the lines for one additional year to November 10, 2016. These lines require a facility fee payment of 0.25% annually based on the total amount of the commitment. The credit spread and facility fee can vary depending on our investment grade rating.

The unsecured lines of credit and senior unsecured notes include covenants that require the maintenance of certain ratios, including debt service coverage and leverage, and limit the payment of dividends such that dividends and distributions will not exceed funds from operations, as defined in the agreements, for the prior fiscal year on an annual basis or 95% of funds from operations on a cumulative basis. As of March 31, 2013 we were in compliance with all of our debt covenants.
23

Debt Maturities
Maturities of the existing long-term debt as of March 31, 2013 are as follows (in thousands):

Calendar Year |  | Amount |
2013 |  | $ | 2,564 |
2014 |  | 3,603 |
2015 |  | 457,260 |
2016 |  | 30,283 |
2017 |  | 3,008 |
Thereafter |  | 587,460 |
Subtotal |  | 1,084,178 |
Net premiums |  | 3,679 |
Total |  | $ | 1,087,857 |

6. Shareholders' Equity of the Company
Throughout the first three months of 2013, Family Limited Partners exchanged a total of 3,545 Operating Partnership units for 14,180 common shares of the Company. After the above described exchanges, the Family Limited Partners owned 1,186,921 Operating Partnership units which were exchangeable for 4,747,684 common shares of the Company.
7. Partners' Equity of the Operating Partnership
The ownership interests of the Operating Partnership as of March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, consisted of the following:

|  | March 31, 2013 |  | December 31, 2012
Common units: |  |  |  |  |  |
General partner |  | 250,000 |  |  | 250,000 |
Limited partners |  | 24,540,705 |  |  | 24,455,812 |
Total common units |  | 24,790,705 |  |  | 24,705,812 |

When the Company issues common shares upon exercise of options or issues restricted share awards, the Operating Partnership issues one corresponding unit of partnership interest to the Company for every four common shares issued.
8. Share-Based Compensation of the Company
We have a shareholder approved share-based compensation plan, the Amended and Restated Incentive Award Plan of Tanger Factory Outlet Centers, Inc. and Tanger Properties Limited Partnership (the "Plan"), which covers our independent directors, officers and our employees. During the first three months of 2013, the Company's Board of Directors approved grants of 349,373 restricted common shares to the Company's independent directors and the Company's senior executive officers. The grant date fair value of the awards was $36.05 per share. The independent directors' restricted common shares vest ratably over a three year period and the senior executive officers' restricted shares vest ratably over a five year period. Compensation expense related to the amortization of the deferred compensation is being recognized in accordance with the vesting schedule of the restricted shares.
In February 2013, the Compensation Committee of the Company approved the general terms of the Tanger Factory Outlet Centers, Inc. 2013 Outperformance Plan (the “2013 OPP"). The 2013 OPP provides for the grant of performance shares under the Amended and Restated Incentive Award Plan of Tanger Factory Outlet Centers, Inc. Under the 2013 OPP, the Company granted an aggregate of 315,150 performance shares to award recipients, which may convert, subject to the achievement of certain goals, into a maximum of 315,150 restricted common shares of the Company based on the Company’s absolute share price appreciation and its share price appreciation relative to its peer group, over the three-year measurement period from January 1, 2013 through December 31, 2015.
24

The 2013 OPP is a long-term incentive compensation plan pursuant to which award recipients may earn up to an aggregate of 315,150 restricted common shares of the Company based on the Company’s share price appreciation (or total shareholder return) over three years beginning on January 1, 2013. The maximum number of shares will be earned under this plan if the Company both (a) achieves 35% or higher share price appreciation, inclusive of all dividends paid, over the three-year measurement period and (b) is in the 70th or greater percentile of its peer group for total shareholder return over the three-year measurement period. The maximum value of the awards, if the Company achieves or exceeds the 35% share price appreciation and is in the 70th or greater percentile of its peer group for total shareholder return over the three-year measurement period, will equal approximately $13.25 million.
Any shares earned on December 31, 2015 are also subject to a time based vesting schedule. 50% of the shares will vest on January 4, 2016 and the remaining 50% will vest on January 3, 2017, contingent upon continued employment with the Company through the vesting dates.
With respect to 70% of the performance shares (or 220,605 shares), 33.33% of this portion of the award (or 73,535 shares) will be earned if the Company’s aggregate share price appreciation, inclusive of all dividends paid during this period, equals 25% over the three-year measurement period, 66.67% of the award (or 147,070 shares) will be earned if the Company’s aggregate share price appreciation, inclusive of all dividends paid during this period equals 30%, and 100.00% of this portion of the award (or 220,605 shares) will be earned if the Company’s aggregate share price appreciation, inclusive of all dividends paid during this period, equals 35% or higher.
With respect to 30% of the performance shares (or 94,545 shares), 33.33% of this portion of the award (or 31,515 shares) will be earned if the Company's share price appreciation inclusive of all dividends paid is in the 50th percentile of its peer group over the three-year measurement period, 66.67% of this portion of the award (or 63,030 shares) will be earned if the Company's share price appreciation inclusive of all dividends paid is in the 60th percentile of its peer group during this period, and 100.00% of this portion of the award (or 94,545 shares) will be earned if the Company's share price appreciation inclusive of all dividends paid is in the 70th percentile of its peer group or greater during this period. The peer group will be based on the SNL Equity REIT index.
The performance shares will convert on a pro-rata basis by linear interpolation between share price appreciation thresholds, both for absolute share price appreciation and for relative share price appreciation amongst the Company's peer group. The share price targets will be reduced on a dollar-for-dollar basis with respect to any dividend payments made during the measurement period. The compensation expense is amortized using the graded vesting attribution method over the requisite service period. The fair value of the awards are calculated using a Monte Carlo simulation pricing model.
We recorded share-based compensation expense in general and administrative expenses in our consolidated statements of operations as follows (in thousands):

|  | Three months ended March 31,
|  | 2013 |  | 2012
Restricted common shares (1) |  | $ | 1,889 |  |  | $ | 2,850 |
Notional unit performance awards |  | 528 |  |  | 489 |
Options |  | 43 |  |  | 52 |
Total share-based compensation |  | $ | 2,460 |  |  | $ | 3,391 |

(1) For the three months ended March 31, 2012, includes approximately $1.3 million of compensation expense related to 45,000 common shares that vested immediately upon grant under the terms of the amended and restated Employment Agreement (the "Employment Agreement") for Steven B. Tanger, our President and Chief Executive Officer.
The following table summarizes information related to unvested restricted common shares outstanding as of March 31, 2013:
25

Unvested Restricted Common Shares |  | Number of shares |  | Weighted-average grant date fair value
Unvested at December 31, 2012 |  | 1,047,993 |  |  | $ | 24.39 |
Granted |  | 349,373 |  |  | 31.01 |
Vested |  | (289,400 | ) |  | 22.35 |
Forfeited |  | (12,000 | ) |  | 25.61 |
Unvested at March 31, 2013 |  | 1,095,966 |  |  | $ | 27.03 |

The total value of restricted common shares vested during the three months ended March 31, 2013 and March 31, 2012 was $9.6 million and $7.9 million, respectively.
As of March 31, 2013, there was $36.8 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested share-based compensation arrangements granted under the Plan. That cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 3.5 years.
9. Equity-Based Compensation of the Operating Partnership
As discussed in Note 8, the Operating Partnership and the Company have a joint plan whereby equity based and performance based awards may be granted to directors, officers and employees. When common shares are issued by the Company, the Operating Partnership issues corresponding units to the Company based on the current exchange ratio as provided by the Operating Partnership agreement. Based on the current exchange ratio, each unit in the Operating Partnership is equivalent to four common shares of the Company. Therefore, when the Company grants an equity based award, the Operating Partnership treats each award as having been granted by the Operating Partnership.
We recorded equity-based compensation expense in general and administrative expenses in our consolidated statements of operations as follows (in thousands):

|  | Three months ended March 31,
Restricted units |  | 2013 |  | 2012
Restricted units (1) |  | $ | 1,924 |  |  | $ | 2,850 |
Notional unit performance awards |  | 506 |  |  | 489 |
Options |  | 52 |  |  | 52 |
Total equity-based compensation |  | $ | 2,482 |  |  | $ | 3,391 |

(1) For the three months ended March 31, 2012, includes approximately $1.3 million of compensation expense related to 11,250 units issued related to a restricted share grant that vested immediately upon grant under the terms of the Employment Agreement for Steven B. Tanger, our President and Chief Executive Officer.
The following table summarizes information related to unvested restricted units outstanding as of March 31, 2013:

Unvested Restricted Units |  | Number of units |  | Weighted-average grant date fair value
Unvested at December 31, 2012 |  | 261,998 |  |  | $ | 97.56 |
Granted |  | 87,343 |  |  | 124.04 |
Vested |  | (72,350 | ) |  | 89.40 |
Forfeited |  | (3,000 | ) |  | 102.44 |
Unvested at March 31, 2013 |  | 273,991 |  |  | $ | 108.12 |

The total value of restricted units vested during the three months ended March 31, 2013 and March 31, 2012, was $9.6 million and $7.9 million, respectively.
26

As of March 31, 2013, there was $36.8 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested equity-based compensation arrangements granted under the Plan. That cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 3.5 years.
10. Earnings Per Share of the Company
The following table sets forth a reconciliation of the numerators and denominators in computing the Company's earnings per share (in thousands, except per share amounts):

|  | Three months ended March 31,
|  | 2013 |  | 2012
Numerator |  |  |  |
Net income attributable to Tanger Factory Outlet Centers, Inc. |  | $ | 15,439 |  |  | $ | 8,128 |
Less allocation of earnings to participating securities |  | (194 | ) |  | (158 | )
Net income available to common shareholders of Tanger Factory Outlet Centers, Inc. |  | $ | 15,245 |  |  | $ | 7,970 |
Denominator |  |  |  |
Basic weighted average common shares |  | 93,132 |  |  | 89,671 |
Effect of notional units |  | 805 |  |  | 1,096 |
Effect of outstanding options and restricted common shares |  | 106 |  |  | 65 |
Diluted weighted average common shares |  | 94,043 |  |  | 90,832 |
Basic earnings per common share: |  |  |  |
Net income |  | $ | 0.16 |  |  | $ | 0.09 |
Diluted earnings per common share: |  |  |  |
Net income |  | $ | 0.16 |  |  | $ | 0.09 |

The notional units are considered contingently issuable common shares and are included in earnings per share if the effect is dilutive using the treasury stock method.
The computation of diluted earnings per share excludes options to purchase common shares when the exercise price is greater than the average market price of the common shares for the period. For the three months ended March 31, 2013, no options were excluded from the computation. For the three months ended March 31, 2012, 174,600 options were excluded from the computation. The assumed exchange of the partnership units held by the noncontrolling interest limited partners as of the beginning of the year, which would result in the elimination of earnings allocated to the noncontrolling interest in the Operating Partnership, would have no impact on earnings per share since the allocation of earnings to a partnership unit, as if exchanged, is equivalent to earnings allocated to a common share.
Certain of the Company's unvested restricted common share awards contain non-forfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents. The impact of these unvested restricted common share awards on earnings per share has been calculated using the two-class method whereby earnings are allocated to the unvested restricted common share awards based on dividends declared and the unvested restricted common shares' participation rights in undistributed earnings. Unvested restricted common shares that do not contain non-forfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents, are included in the diluted earnings per share compilation if the effect is dilutive, using the treasury stock method.
27

11. Earnings Per Unit of the Operating Partnership
The following table sets forth a reconciliation of the numerators and denominators in computing the Operating Partnership's earnings per unit (in thousands, except per unit amounts):

|  | Three months ended March 31,
|  | 2013 |  | 2012
Numerator |  |  |  |  |
Net income attributable to partners of the Operating Partnership |  | $ | 16,228 |  |  | $ | 8,841 |
Less allocation of earnings to participating securities |  | (194 | ) |  | (158 | )
Net income available to common unitholders of the Operating Partnership |  | $ | 16,034 |  |  | $ | 8,683 |
Denominator |  |  |  |
Basic weighted average common units |  | 24,472 |  |  | 24,382 |
Effect of notional units |  | 201 |  |  | 274 |
Effect of outstanding options and restricted common units |  | 27 |  |  | 16 |
Diluted weighted average common units |  | 24,700 |  |  | 24,672 |
Basic earnings per common unit: |  |  |  |
Net income |  | $ | 0.66 |  |  | $ | 0.36 |
Diluted earnings per common unit: |  |  |  |
Net income |  | $ | 0.65 |  |  | $ | 0.35 |

The notional units are considered contingently issuable common units and are included in earnings per unit if the effect is dilutive using the treasury stock method.
When the Company issues common shares upon exercise of options or issues restricted share awards, the Operating Partnership issues one corresponding unit to the Company for every four common shares issued.
The computation of diluted earnings per unit excludes options to purchase common units when the exercise price is greater than the average market price of the common units for the period. The market price of a common unit is considered to be equivalent to four times the market price of a Company common share. For the three months ended March 31, 2013, no units were excluded from the computation. For the three months ended March 31, 2012, 43,650 options were excluded from the computation. No options were excluded from the computation for the three months ended March 31, 2013.
Certain of the Company's unvested restricted common share awards contain non-forfeitable rights to distributions or distribution equivalents. The impact of these unvested restricted unit awards on earnings per unit has been calculated using the two-class method whereby earnings are allocated to the unvested restricted unit awards based on distributions declared and the unvested restricted units' participation rights in undistributed earnings. Unvested restricted common shares that do not contain non-forfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents, are included in the diluted earnings per share compilation if the effect is dilutive, using the treasury stock method.
28

12. Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income of the Company
The following table summarizes the changes in accumulated balances of other comprehensive income for the three months ended March 31, 2013 (in thousands):

|  | Gain on cash flow hedges (1) |  | Foreign currency items |  | Total
Balance, December 31, 2012 |  | $ | 1,205 |  |  | $ | (5 | ) |  | $ | 1,200 |
Other comprehensive income before reclassifications |  | — |  |  | 65 |  |  | 65 |
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income |  | (86 | ) |  | — |  |  | (86 | )
Net increase (decrease) in other comprehensive income |  | (86 | ) |  | 65 |  |  | (21 | )
Balance, March 31, 2013 |  | $ | 1,119 |  |  | $ | 60 |  |  | $ | 1,179 |

(1) | Represents remaining amount of gain recorded to other comprehensive income in 2005 as a result of the settlement of a US Treasury index rate lock agreement. This agreement was unwound in the fourth quarter of 2005. The gain was recorded in other comprehensive income and is being amortized into earnings through interest expense using the effective interest method over a 10 year period that coincides with the interest payments associated with the 6.15% senior unsecured notes due in 2015.

13. Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income of the Operating Partnership
The following table summarizes the changes in accumulated balances of other comprehensive income for the three months ended March 31, 2013 (in thousands):

|  | Gain on cash flow hedges (1) |  | Foreign currency items |  | Total
Balance, December 31, 2012 |  | $ | 1,112 |  |  | $ | (5 | ) |  | $ | 1,107 |
Other comprehensive income before reclassifications |  | — |  |  | 68 |  |  | 68 |
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income |  | (90 | ) |  | — |  |  | (90 | )
Net increase (decrease) in other comprehensive income |  | (90 | ) |  | 68 |  |  | (22 | )
Balance, March 31, 2013 |  | $ | 1,022 |  |  | $ | 63 |  |  | $ | 1,085 |

(1) | Represents remaining amount of gain recorded to other comprehensive income in 2005 as a result of the settlement of a US Treasury index rate lock agreement. This agreement was unwound in the fourth quarter of 2005. The gain was recorded in other comprehensive income and is being amortized into earnings through interest expense using the effective interest method over a 10 year period that coincides with the interest payments associated with the 6.15% senior unsecured notes due in 2015.

29

14. Fair Value Measurements
Fair value guidance establishes a three-tier fair value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value. These tiers are defined as follows:

Tier |  | Description
Level 1 |  | Defined as observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets
Level 2 |  | Defined as inputs other than quoted prices in active markets that are either directly or indirectly observable
Level 3 |  | Defined as unobservable inputs in which little or no market data exists, therefore requiring an entity to develop its own assumptions

We had no assets or liabilities measured at fair value on either a recurring or non-recurring basis as of March 31, 2013 or December 31, 2012.
The estimated fair value of our debt, consisting of senior unsecured notes, unsecured term loans, secured mortgages and unsecured lines of credit, at March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, was $1.2 billion and $1.2 billion, respectively, and its recorded value was $1.1 billion and $1.1 billion, respectively. Fair values were determined based on level 2 inputs using discounted cash flow analysis with an interest rate or credit spread similar to that of current market borrowing arrangements.
15. Non-Cash Activities
We purchase capital equipment and incur costs relating to construction of facilities, including tenant finishing allowances. Expenditures included in construction trade payables as of March 31, 2013 and 2012 amounted to $7.7 million and $15.7 million, respectively.
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The discussion of our results of operations reported in the unaudited, consolidated statements of operations compares the three months ended March 31, 2013 with the three months ended March 31, 2012. The results of operations discussion is combined for Tanger Factory Outlet Centers, Inc. and Tanger Properties Limited Partnership because the results are virtually the same for both entities. The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the unaudited consolidated financial statements appearing elsewhere in this report. Historical results and percentage relationships set forth in the unaudited, consolidated statements of operations, including trends which might appear, are not necessarily indicative of future operations. Unless the context indicates otherwise, the term, "Company", refers to Tanger Factory Outlet Centers, Inc. and subsidiaries and the term, "Operating Partnership", refers to Tanger Properties Limited Partnership and subsidiaries. The terms "we", "our" and "us" refer to the Company or the Company and the Operating Partnership together, as the text requires.
Cautionary Statements
Certain statements made below are forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. We intend for such forward-looking statements to be covered by the safe harbor provisions for forward-looking statements contained in the Private Securities Reform Act of 1995 and included this statement for purposes of complying with these safe harbor provisions. Forward-looking statements, which are based on certain assumptions and describe our future plans, strategies, beliefs and expectations, are generally identifiable by use of the words "believe", "expect", "intend", "anticipate", "estimate", "project", or similar expressions. You should not rely on forward-looking statements since they involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which are, in some cases, beyond our control and which could materially affect our actual results, performance or achievements. Factors which may cause actual results to differ materially from current expectations include, but are not limited to, those set forth under Item 1A - "Risk Factors" in the Company's and the Operating Partnership's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012. There have been no material changes to the risk factors listed there through March 31, 2013.
30

General Overview
At March 31, 2013, we had 36 consolidated outlet centers in 24 states totaling 10.8 million square feet. The table below details our development activities that significantly impacted our results of operations and liquidity from January 1, 2012 to March 31, 2013.

Center |  | Date Open |  | Purchase Price (in millions) |  | Square Feet (in thousands) |  | Centers |  | States
As of January 1, 2012 |  |  |  |  |  | 10,724 |  |  | 36 |  |  | 24 |
Expansion: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Locust Grove, GA |  | Second quarter 2012 |  |  |  | 26 |  |  | — |  |  | — |
Other |  |  |  |  |  | (13 | ) |  | — |  |  | — |
As of December 31, 2012 |  |  |  |  |  | 10,737 |  |  | 36 |  |  | 24 |
Expansion: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Gonzales, LA |  | First and second quarter 2013 |  |  |  | 40 |  |  |  |  |
Other |  |  |  |  |  | 7 |  |  | — |  |  | — |
As of March 31, 2013 |  |  |  |  |  | 10,784 |  |  | 36 |  |  | 24 |

31

The following table summarizes certain information for our existing outlet centers in which we have an ownership interest as of March 31, 2013. Except as noted, all properties are fee owned.

Location |  | Square |  | %
Consolidated Outlet Centers |  | Feet |  | Occupied
Riverhead, New York (1) |  | 729,734 |  |  | 98
Rehoboth Beach, Delaware (1) |  | 568,975 |  |  | 98
Foley, Alabama |  | 557,228 |  |  | 96
Atlantic City, New Jersey (1) |  | 489,762 |  |  | 94
San Marcos, Texas |  | 441,929 |  |  | 99
Myrtle Beach Hwy 501, South Carolina |  | 425,247 |  |  | 99
Sevierville, Tennessee (1) |  | 417,963 |  |  | 98
Jeffersonville, Ohio |  | 411,776 |  |  | 99
Myrtle Beach Hwy 17, South Carolina (1) |  | 402,791 |  |  | 100
Washington, Pennsylvania |  | 372,972 |  |  | 100
Commerce II, Georgia |  | 370,512 |  |  | 100
Charleston, South Carolina |  | 365,107 |  |  | 97
Howell, Michigan |  | 324,652 |  |  | 98
Locust Grove, Georgia |  | 321,070 |  |  | 100
Mebane, North Carolina |  | 318,910 |  |  | 100
Gonzales, Louisiana |  | 318,666 |  |  | 99
Branson, Missouri |  | 302,922 |  |  | 100
Park City, Utah |  | 298,391 |  |  | 100
Westbrook, Connecticut |  | 289,898 |  |  | 98
Williamsburg, Iowa |  | 277,230 |  |  | 99
Lincoln City, Oregon |  | 270,212 |  |  | 98
Lancaster, Pennsylvania |  | 254,002 |  |  | 100
Tuscola, Illinois |  | 250,439 |  |  | 94
Hershey, Pennsylvania |  | 247,448 |  |  | 100
Tilton, New Hampshire |  | 245,698 |  |  | 100
Hilton Head II, South Carolina |  | 206,529 |  |  | 97
Fort Myers, Florida |  | 198,877 |  |  | 94
Ocean City, Maryland (1) |  | 197,747 |  |  | 89
Terrell, Texas |  | 177,800 |  |  | 97
Hilton Head I, South Carolina |  | 177,199 |  |  | 100
Barstow, California |  | 171,300 |  |  | 94
West Branch, Michigan |  | 112,570 |  |  | 95
Blowing Rock, North Carolina |  | 104,154 |  |  | 99
Nags Head, North Carolina |  | 82,161 |  |  | 100
Kittery I, Maine |  | 57,667 |  |  | 100
Kittery II, Maine |  | 24,619 |  |  | 100
Totals |  | 10,784,157 |  |  | 98

(1) | These properties or a portion thereof are subject to a ground lease.

32

Location |  | Square |  | %
Unconsolidated joint venture properties |  | Feet |  | Occupied
Deer Park, NY (33.3% owned) |  | 741,981 |  |  | 92
Texas City, TX (50% owned) |  | 352,705 |  |  | 97
Glendale, AZ (58% owned) |  | 332,234 |  |  | 95
Wisconsin Dells, WI (50% owned) |  | 265,086 |  |  | 100
Bromont, QC (50% owned) |  | 162,943 |  |  | 89
Cookstown, ON (50% owned) |  | 155,522 |  |  | 97
Saint-Sauveur, QC (50% owned) |  | 116,097 |  |  | 100
Total |  | 2,126,568 |  |  |

Leasing Activity
The following table provides information for our consolidated outlet centers regarding space re-leased or renewed:

| Three months ended March 31, 2013
| # of Leases | Square Feet | Average Annual Straight-line Rent (psf) | Average Tenant Allowance (psf) | Average Initial Term (in years) | Net Average Annual Straight-line Rent (psf) (1)
Re-tenant | 90 |  | 294,000 |  | $ | 29.76 |  | $ | 42.31 |  | 8.77 |  | $ | 24.94 |
Renewal | 231 |  | 1,135,000 |  | $ | 23.17 |  | $ | 0.72 |  | 4.82 |  | $ | 23.02 |
| Three months ended March 31, 2012
| # of Leases | Square Feet | Average Annual Straight-line Rent (psf) | Average Tenant Allowance (psf) | Average Initial Term (in years) | Net Average Annual Straight-line Rent (psf) (1)
Re-tenant | 60 |  | 220,000 |  | $ | 32.53 |  | $ | 38.86 |  | 9.18 |  | $ | 28.30 |
Renewal | 188 |  | 921,000 |  | $ | 21.97 |  | $ | — |  | 4.58 |  | $ | 21.97 |

(1) | Net average straight-line rentals is calculated by dividing the average tenant allowance costs per square foot by the average initial term and subtracting this calculated number from the average straight-line rent per year amount. The average annual straight-line rent disclosed in the table above includes all concessions, abatements and reimbursements of rent to te nant s. The average tenant allowance disclosed in the table above includes landlord costs.

33

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Comparison of the three months ended March 31, 2013 to the three months ended March 31, 2012
NET INCOME
Net income increased $7.4 million in the 2013 period to $16.2 million as compared to $8.8 million for the 2012 period. The increase in net income was a result of a $4.4 million increase in operating revenues, a $2.0 million increase in equity in earnings from unconsolidated joint venture, a $448,000 decrease in general and administrative expenses, a $3.2 million decrease in depreciation and amortization collectively, which were partially offset by, a $542,000 increase in interest expense.
BASE RENTALS
Base rentals increased $2.0 million, or 4%, in the 2013 period compared to the 2012 period. The following table sets forth the changes in various components of base rentals (in thousands):

|  | 2013 |  | 2012 |  | Change
Existing property base rentals |  | $ | 59,023 |  |  | $ | 56,456 |  |  | $ | 2,567 |
Termination fees |  | 80 |  |  | 415 |  |  | (335 | )
Amortization of above and below market rent adjustments, net |  | 141 |  |  | 348 |  |  | (207 | )
|  | $ | 59,244 |  |  | $ | 57,219 |  |  | $ | 2,025 |

Base rental income generated from existing properties in our portfolio increased due to increases in rental rates on lease renewals and incremental rents from re-tenanting vacant spaces.
Termination fees decreased due to the 2012 period containing a tenant that exited the outlet industry and terminated their leases prior to the contractual obligation.
At March 31, 2013, the net asset representing the amount of unrecognized, combined above and below market lease values, recorded as a part of the purchase price of acquired properties, totaled approximately $5.3 million. If a tenant terminates its lease prior to the contractual termination of the lease and no rental payments are being made on the lease, any unamortized balance of the related above or below market lease value will be written off and could materially impact our net income positively or negatively.
PERCENTAGE RENTALS
Percentage rentals, which represent revenues based on a percentage of tenants' sales volume above predetermined levels, increased $273,000, or 16%, from the 2012 period to the 2013 period. The increase in percentage rentals is directly related to higher tenant sales productivity. Reported tenant comparable sales for our consolidated properties for the rolling twelve months ended March 31, 2013 increased 2.3% to $380 per square foot. Reported tenant comparable sales is defined as the weighted average sales per square foot reported in space open for the full duration of each comparison period.
EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENTS
Expense reimbursements increased $1.6 million, or 7%, in the 2013 period compared to the 2012 period. The following table sets forth the changes in various components of expense reimbursements (in thousands):

|  | 2013 |  | 2012 |  | Change
Existing property expense reimbursements |  | $ | 25,267 |  |  | $ | 23,544 |  |  | $ | 1,723 |
Termination fees allocated to expense reimbursements |  | 39 |  |  | 129 |  |  | (90 | )
|  | $ | 25,306 |  |  | $ | 23,673 |  |  | $ | 1,633 |

Expense reimbursements, which represent the contractual recovery from tenants of certain common area maintenance, insurance, property tax, promotional, advertising and management expenses, generally fluctuate consistently with the reimbursable property operating expenses to which they relate.
34

OTHER INCOME
Other income increased $515,000, or 32%, in the 2013 period as compared to the 2012 period. The majority of the increase is due to the incremental fees earned from the four unconsolidated joint ventures that were added to the portfolio during the fourth quarter of 2012.
PROPERTY OPERATING EXPENSES
Property operating expenses increased $2.0 million, or 8%, in the 2013 period as compared to the 2012 period. The increase is due primarily to higher common area maintenance costs for various projects and increased snow removal costs in the 2013 period compared with 2012 period.
GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE
General and administrative expenses decreased $448,000, or 4%, in the 2013 period compared to the 2012 period. In the 2012 period, Steven B. Tanger, pursuant to an amendment to his employment contract received 45,000 common shares resulting in a charge of approximately $1.3 million. Excluding this charge, general and administrative expenses increased approximately $858,000. This increase was mainly due to additional share-based compensation expense related to the 2013 restricted share grant to directors and certain officers of the Company . Also, the 2013 period included higher payroll related expenses on a comparative basis to the 2012 period due to the addition of new employees since April 1, 2012.
ACQUISITION COSTS
The 2013 period includes costs related to the unsuccessful acquisition of properties.
DEPRECIATION AND AMORTIZATION
Depreciation and amortization decreased $3.2 million, or 13%, in the 2013 period compared to the 2012 period as certain construction and development related assets and lease related intangibles recorded as part of the acquisition price of acquired properties, which are amortized over shorter lives, became fully depreciated in 2012.
INTEREST EXPENSE
Interest expense increased approximately $542,000, or 4%, in the 2013 period compared to the 2012 period. The primary reason for the increase in interest expen se is the increase in the average amount of debt outstanding from approximately $1.0 billion for the 2012 period to approximately $1.1 billion for the 2013 period. The higher debt levels outstanding were a result of fundings for additional investments in our unconsolidated joint ventures.
EQUITY IN EARNINGS (LOSSES) OF UNCONSOLIDATED JOINT VENTURES
Equity in earnings (losses) of unconsolidated joint ventures increased approximately $2.0 million in the 2013 period compared to the 2012 period. The primary reason for the increase is due to the addition of four unconsolidated joint ventures to the portfolio during the fourth quarter of 2012.
35

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES OF THE COMPANY
In this "Liquidity and Capital Resources of the Company" section, the term, the Company, refers only to Tanger Factory Outlet Centers, Inc. on an unconsolidated basis, excluding the Operating Partnership.
The Company's business is operated primarily through the Operating Partnership. The Company issues public equity from time to time, but does not otherwise generate any capital itself or conduct any business itself, other than incurring certain expenses in operating as a public company, which are fully reimbursed by the Operating Partnership. The Company does not hold any indebtedness, and its only material asset is its ownership of partnership interests of the Operating Partnership.
The Company's principal funding requirement is the payment of dividends on its common shares. The Company's principal source of funding for its dividend payments is distributions it receives from the Operating Partnership.
Through its ownership of the sole general partner of the Operating Partnership, the Company has the full, exclusive and complete responsibility for the Operating Partnership's day-to-day management and control. The Company causes the Operating Partnership to distribute all, or such portion as the Company may in its discretion determine, of its available cash in the manner provided in the Operating Partnership's partnership agreement. The Company receives proceeds from equity issuances from time to time, but is required by the Operating Partnership's partnership agreement to contribute the proceeds from its equity issuances to the Operating Partnership in exchange for partnership units of the Operating Partnership.
The Company is a well-known seasoned issuer with a shelf registration that expires in June 2015 that allows the Company to register unspecified various classes of equity securities and the Operating Partnership to register unspecified, various classes of debt securities. As circumstances warrant, the Company may issue equity from time to time on an opportunistic basis, dependent upon market conditions and available pricing. The Operating Partnership may use the proceeds to repay debt, including borrowings under its lines of credit, develop new or existing properties, to make acquisitions of properties or portfolios of properties, to invest in existing or newly created joint ventures or for general corporate purposes.
The liquidity of the Company is dependent on the Operating Partnership's ability to make sufficient distributions to the Company. The Company also guarantees some of the Operating Partnership's debt. If the Operating Partnership fails to fulfill its debt requirements, which trigger the Company's guarantee obligations, then the Company may be required to fulfill its cash payment commitments under such guarantees. However, the Company's only material asset is its investment in the Operating Partnership.
The Company believes the Operating Partnership's sources of working capital, specifically its cash flow from operations, and borrowings available under its unsecured lines of credit, are adequate for it to make its distribution payments to the Company and, in turn, for the Company to make its dividend payments to its shareholders. However, there can be no assurance that the Operating Partnership's sources of capital will continue to be available at all or in amounts sufficient to meet its needs, including its ability to make distribution payments to the Company. The unavailability of capital could adversely affect the Operating Partnership's ability to pay its distributions to the Company which will, in turn, adversely affect the Company's ability to pay cash dividends to its shareholders.
For the Company to maintain its qualification as a REIT, it must pay dividends to its shareholders aggregating annually at least 90% of its taxable income. While historically the Company has satisfied this distribution requirement by making cash distributions to its shareholders, it may choose to satisfy this requirement by making distributions of cash or other property, including, in limited circumstances, the Company's own shares.
As a result of this distribution requirement, the Operating Partnership cannot rely on retained earnings to fund its on-going operations to the same extent that other companies whose parent companies are not real estate investment trusts can. The Company may need to continue to raise capital in the equity markets to fund the Operating Partnership's working capital needs, as well as potential developments of new or existing properties, acquisitions or investments in existing or newly created joint ventures.
36

As the sole owner of the general partner with control of the Operating Partnership, the Company consolidates the Operating Partnership for financial reporting purposes. The Company does not have significant assets other than its investment in the Operating Partnership. Therefore, the assets and liabilities and the revenues and expenses of the Company and the Operating Partnership are the same on their respective financial statements, except for immaterial differences related to cash, other assets and accrued liabilities that arise from public company expenses paid by the Company. However, all debt is held directly or indirectly at the Operating Partnership level, and the Company has guaranteed some of the Operating Partnership's unsecured debt as discussed below. Because the Company consolidates the Operating Partnership, the section entitled "Liquidity and Capital Resources of the Operating Partnership" should be read in conjunction with this section to understand the liquidity and capital resources of the Company on a consolidated basis and how the Company is operated as a whole.
On April 4, 2013, the Company's Board of Directors declared a $.225 cash dividend per common share payable on May 15, 2013 to each shareholder of record on April 30, 2013, and caused an $.90 per Operating Partnership unit cash distribution to the Operating Partnership's unitholders.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES OF THE OPERATING PARTNERSHIP
General Overview
In this "Liquidity and Capital Resources of the Operating Partnership" section, the terms "we", "our" and "us" refer to the Operating Partnership or the Operating Partnership and the Company together, as the text requires.
Property rental income represents our primary source to pay property operating expenses, debt service, capital expenditures and distributions, excluding non-recurring capital expenditures and acquisitions. To the extent that our cash flow from operating activities is insufficient to cover such non-recurring capital expenditures and acquisitions, we finance such activities from borrowings under our unsecured lines of credit or from the proceeds from the Operating Partnership's debt offerings and the Company's equity offerings.
Our strategy is to achieve a strong and flexible financial position by seeking to: (1) maintain a conservative leverage position relative to our portfolio when pursuing new development, expansion and acquisition opportunities, (2) extend and sequence debt maturities, (3) manage our interest rate risk through a proper mix of fixed and variable rate debt, (4) maintain access to liquidity by using our unsecured lines of credit in a conservative manner and (5) preserve internally generated sources of capital by strategically divesting of underperforming assets and maintaining a conservative distribution payout ratio. We manage our capital structure to reflect a long term investment approach and utilize multiple sources of capital to meet our requirements.
The following table sets forth our changes in cash flows (in thousands):

|  | Three months ended March 31, 2013 |  |
|  | 2013 |  | 2012 |  | Change
Net cash provided by operating activities |  | $ | 35,252 |  |  | $ | 42,553 |  |  | $ | (7,301 | )
Net cash used in investing activities |  | (17,673 | ) |  | (30,972 | ) |  | 13,299 |
Net cash used in financing activities |  | (25,262 | ) |  | (8,732 | ) |  | (16,530 | )
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |  | $ | (7,683 | ) |  | $ | 2,849 |  |  | $ | (10,532 | )

Operating Activities
Cash provided by operating activities during 2013 was positively impacted by an increase in operating income, but decreased year over year due to significant changes in accounts payable and accrued expenses.
37

Investing Activities
Cash flow used in investing activities was higher in the 2012 period compared to the 2013 period due primarily to contributions to unconsolidated joint ventures during 2012 to fund the development activities in Texas City, TX and Glendale, AZ and a contribution to RioCan of $15.1 million to retire mortgage debt associated with the Cookstown, ON property. The only significant contribution to an unconsolidated joint venture in the 2013 period was for the Cookstown, ON property to fund our portion of the acquisition price of additional land that will be utilized for a center expansion.
Financing Activities
Cash used in financing activities in 2012 was lower than the 2013 period due to the borrowings required in 2012 to fund the development activities and the contribution to RioCan described above.
Capital Expenditures
The following table details our capital expenditures (in thousands):

|  | Three months ended March 31, 2013 |  |
|  | 2013 |  | 2012 |  | Change
Capital expenditures analysis: |  |  |  |  |  |
New center developments |  | $ | 4,220 |  |  | $ | 2,336 |  |  | $ | 1,884 |
Center redevelopment |  | — |  |  | 62 |  |  | (62 | )
Major center renovations |  | 858 |  |  | 1,480 |  |  | (622 | )
Second generation tenant allowances |  | 1,885 |  |  | 5,537 |  |  | (3,652 | )
Other capital expenditures |  | 2,192 |  |  | 962 |  |  | 1,230 |
|  | 9,155 |  |  | 10,377 |  |  | (1,222 | )
Conversion from accrual to cash basis |  | (660 | ) |  | (2,042 | ) |  | 1,382 |
Additions to rental property-cash basis |  | $ | 8,495 |  |  | $ | 8,335 |  |  | $ | 160 |

• | New center development expenditures, which includes first generation tenant allowances, included expansions in Gonzales, Louisiana and Sevierville, Tennessee in the 2013 period. The 2012 period included an expansion in Locust Grove, Georgia.

• | Major center renovations in the 2013 period included renovation activities at our Gonzales, LA center. The 2012 period included on-going renovation efforts at the centers acquired during the second and third quarters of 2011.

Current Developments
We intend to continue to grow our portfolio by developing, expanding or acquiring additional outlet centers. In the section below, we describe the new developments that are either currently planned, underway or recently completed. However, you should note that any developments or expansions that we, or a joint venture that we are involved in, have planned or anticipated may not be started or completed as scheduled, or may not result in accretive net income or funds from operations ("FFO"). See the section "Supplemental Earnings Measures" - "Funds From Operations" in the Management's Discussion and Analysis section for further discussion of FFO. In addition, we regularly evaluate acquisition or disposition proposals and engage from time to time in negotiations for acquisitions or dispositions of properties. We may also enter into letters of intent for the purchase or sale of properties. Any prospective acquisition or disposition that is being evaluated or which is subject to a letter of intent may not be consummated, or if consummated, may not result in an increase in liquidity, net income or FFO.
38

POTENTIAL FUTURE DEVELOPMENTS
As of the date of this filing, we are in the initial study period for potential new developments, including sites located in Scottsdale, Arizona; Charlotte, North Carolina; Columbus, Ohio; Foxwoods Resort Casino in Mashantucket, Connecticut ("Foxwoods"); Clarksburg, Maryland; Toronto, Ontario and Ottawa, Ontario. The Ottawa and Toronto sites, if developed, will be undertaken by our Canadian Joint Venture with our RioCan partner (see discussion under the caption "RioCan Canada" in the section titled "Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements"). We may also use joint venture arrangements to develop other potential sites. There can be no assurance, however, that these potential future developments will ultimately be developed.
In the case of projects to be wholly-owned by us, we expect to fund these projects from amounts available under our unsecured lines of credit, but may also fund them with capital from additional public debt and equity offerings. For projects to be developed through joint venture arrangements, we typically use collateralized construction loans to fund a portion of the project, with our share of the equity requirements funded from sources previously described.
UNCONSOLIDATED JOINT VENTURES
We have formed joint venture arrangements to develop outlet centers that are currently in various stages of development in several markets. See "Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements" for a discussion of unconsolidated joint venture development activities.
Financing Arrangements
At March 31, 2013, 90% of our outstanding debt consisted of unsecured borrowings and 90% of the gross book value of our real estate portfolio was unencumbered. We maintain unsecured lines of credit that provide for borrowings of up to $520.0 million and bear interest at a rate of LIBOR + 1.25%. Our unsecured lines of credit have an expiration date of November 10, 2015 with an option for a one year extension.
We intend to retain the ability to raise additional capital, including public debt or equity, to pursue attractive investment opportunities that may arise and to otherwise act in a manner that we believe to be in the best interests of our shareholders and unitholders. The Company is a well-known seasoned issuer with a joint shelf registration with the Operating Partnership, expiring in June 2015, that allows us to register unspecified amounts of different classes of securities on Form S-3. To generate capital to reinvest into other attractive investment opportunities, we may also consider the use of additional operational and developmental joint ventures, the sale or lease of outparcels on our existing properties and the sale of certain properties that do not meet our long-term investment criteria. Based on cash provided by operations, existing lines of credit, ongoing relationships with certain financial institutions and our ability to sell debt or issue equity subject to market conditions, we believe that we have access to the necessary financing to fund the planned capital expenditures through the end of 2013.
We anticipate that adequate cash will be available to fund our operating and administrative expenses, regular debt service obligations, and the payment of dividends in accordance with REIT requirements in both the short and long-term. Although we receive most of our rental payments on a monthly basis, distributions to shareholders and unitholders are made quarterly and interest payments on the senior, unsecured notes are made semi-annually. Amounts accumulated for such payments will be used in the interim to reduce the outstanding borrowings under our existing unsecured lines of credit or invested in short-term money market or other suitable instruments.
We believe our current balance sheet position is financially sound; however, due to the uncertainty and unpredictability of the capital and credit markets, we can give no assurance that affordable access to capital will exist between now and 2015 when our next significant debt maturities occur.
The Operating Partnership's debt agreements require the maintenance of certain ratios, including debt service coverage and leverage, and limit the payment of dividends such that dividends and distributions will not exceed funds from operations, as defined in the agreements, for the prior fiscal year on an annual basis or 95% on a cumulative basis. We have historically been and currently are in compliance with all of our debt covenants. We expect to remain in compliance with all of our existing debt covenants; however, should circumstances arise that would cause us to be in default, the various lenders would have the ability to accelerate the maturity on our outstanding debt.
39

The Operating Partnership's senior unsecured notes contain covenants and restrictions requiring us to meet certain financial ratios and reporting requirements. Key financial covenants and their covenant levels include:

Senior unsecured notes financial covenants | Required | Actual |
Total consolidated debt to adjusted total assets | <60% | 46 | %
Total secured debt to adjusted total assets | <40% | 5 | %
Total unencumbered assets to unsecured debt | >135% | 198 | %

OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS
The following table details certain information as of March 31, 2013 about various unconsolidated real estate joint ventures in which we have an ownership interest:

Joint Venture |  | Center Location |  | Ownership % |  | Square Feet |  | Carrying Value of Investment (in millions)
Deer Park |  | Deer Park, Long Island NY |  | 33.3 | % |  | 741,981 |  |  | $ | 2.4 |
Galveston/Houston |  | Texas City, TX |  | 50.0 | % |  | 352,705 |  |  | 39.8 |
National Harbor |  | Washington D.C. Metro Area |  | 50.0 | % |  | — |  |  | 2.6 |
RioCan Canada |  | Various |  | 50.0 | % |  | 434,562 |  |  | 66.8 |
Westgate |  | Glendale, Arizona |  | 58.0 | % |  | 332,234 |  |  | 19.6 |
Wisconsin Dells |  | Wisconsin Dells, WI |  | 50.0 | % |  | 265,086 |  |  | 2.6 |
Other |  |  |  |  |  | — |  |  | 0.2 |
Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | $ | 134.0 |

Each of the above ventures contain make whole provisions in the event that demands are made on any existing guarantees. In addition, the joint venture agreements contain other provisions where a venture partner can force the other partners to either buy or sell their investment in the joint venture. Should this occur, we may be required to sell the property to the venture partner or incur a significant cash outflow in order to maintain ownership of these outlet centers.
Deer Park, Long Island, New York
In December 2011, the joint venture refinanced its mortgage and mezzanine loans, totaling $246.9 million. The non-default interest rates for the mortgage and mezzanine loans are LIBOR + 3.50% and LIBOR + 5.00%, respectively and both loans mature on May 17, 2014. The loans require certain financial covenants, such as debt service coverage and loan to value ratios, to be met at various measurement dates. Based on the administrative agent bank's calculation of Deer Park's debt service coverage ratio utilizing financial information as of December 31, 2012, the joint venture was not in compliance with the coverage ratio. As a result, on March 22, 2013, the lender group placed Deer Park in default. The lenders have advised the joint venture that a principal payment of approximately $14.2 million would satisfy the debt service coverage test. Such principal payment would require additional capital contributions to Deer Park by its partners. Deer Park does not agree with the lender's principal payment computation and believes the principal payment required could be substantially less. As a result, no capital contributions have been authorized by the managing member of Deer Park. The managing member continues to work with the administrative agent bank of the lender group to negotiate a resolution. The lenders have also notified Deer Park that the default interest rates will continue to accrue until the default is cured. The default interest rates for the mortgage and mezzanine loans are PRIME + 7.5% and LIBOR + 9%, respectively.
The Company and its two joint venture partners have each, jointly and severally, guaranteed the payment of interest (but not principal) on the loans. The operations from Deer Park, together with cash on hand in the joint venture, have been sufficient in the past to pay interest on the loans, although the historical operations would not have generated sufficient cash flow to pay fully the monthly interest at the additional default interest rate.
40

In addition, the managing member delivered to us a revocable notice of termination of our property management agreement with Deer Park that purports to be effective September 1, 2013. We believe the decision to terminate was improper and we continue to manage the property. We are in discussions with our partners on these management issues as well as the matters with the lenders described above. There can be no assurance that we will be able to resolve these matters on favorable terms.
41

Deer Park Warehouse, Long Island, New York
In March 2013, in connection with the Loan Forbearance Agreement signed in 2012 with the lender to the joint venture, the warehouse property was sold for approximately $1.2 million. The proceeds were used to satisfy the terms of the forbearance agreement. There was no impact to the net income of the joint venture as a result of this sale and the retirement of the associated mortgage debt.
National Harbor Washington D.C. Metro Area
In May 2011, we announced the formation of a joint venture for the development of a Tanger Outlet Center at National Harbor in the Washington, D.C. Metro area. The planned Tanger Outlet Center is expected to contain approximately 80 brand name and designer outlet stores in a center measuring up to 340,000 square feet. In November 2012, the joint venture broke ground and began site development. Both parties have made initial equity contributions of $2.6 million to fund certain pre-development costs. In February 2013, the joint venture executed a term sheet for a three year construction loan with the ability to borrow up to $61.0 million, which carries an interest rate of LIBOR + 1.65%. The joint venture currently expects to close on the loan by the end of May 2013. We have agreed to provide property management, leasing and marketing services to the joint venture, and with our partner, to jointly provide site development and construction supervision services.
RioCan Canada
In March of 2013 the RioCan Joint Venture acquired the land adjacent to the existing Cookstown Outlet Mall for $13.9 million. The land purchase will be used as the site for the joint venture's expansion of the Cookstown Outlet Mall which we expect to begin during the second quarter of 2013.
The following table details our share of the debt maturities of the unconsolidated joint ventures as of March 31, 2013 (in millions):

Joint Venture |  | Total Joint Venture Debt (in millions) |  | Maturity Date |  | Interest Rate
Deer Park (1) |  | $ | 246.9 |  |  | May 2014 |  | LIBOR + 3.50% to 5.00%
RioCan Canada |  | $ | 19.5 |  |  | June 2015 and May 2020 |  | 5.10% to 5.75%
Westgate |  | $ | 38.6 |  |  | June 2015 |  | LIBOR + 1.75%
Wisconsin Dells |  | $ | 24.3 |  |  | December 2022 |  | LIBOR + 2.25%

(1) | See Deer Park paragraph above in this section for discussion of notice of default related to joint venture debt and applicable interest rates.

Management, leasing and marketing fees, which we believe approximate current market rates, earned from services provided to our unconsolidated joint ventures were recognized in other income as follows (in thousands):

|  | Three months ended March 31,
|  | 2013 |  | 2012
Fee: |  |  |  |
Development |  | $ | 71 |  |  | $ | — |
Loan Guarantee |  | 40 |  |  | — |
Management and leasing |  | 844 |  |  | 479 |
Marketing |  | 110 |  |  | 53 |
Total Fees |  | $ | 1,065 |  |  | $ | 532 |

42

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES
Refer to our 2012 Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company and the Operating Partnership for a discussion of our critical accounting policies which include principles of consolidation, acquisition of real estate, cost capitalization, impairment of long-lived assets and revenue recognition. There have been no material changes to these policies in 2013.
SUPPLEMENTAL EARNINGS MEASURES
Funds From Operations
Funds From Operations ("FFO") represents income before extraordinary items and gains (losses) on sale or disposal of depreciable operating properties, plus depreciation and amortization uniquely significant to real estate, impairment losses on depreciable real estate of consolidated real estate and after adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures, including depreciation and amortization, and impairment losses on investments in unconsolidated joint ventures driven by a measurable decrease in the fair value of depreciable real estate held by the unconsolidated joint ventures.
FFO is intended to exclude historical cost depreciation of real estate as required by United States Generally Accepted Accounting Principles ("GAAP") which assumes that the value of real estate assets diminishes ratably over time. Historically, however, real estate values have risen or fallen with market conditions. Because FFO excludes depreciation and amortization unique to real estate, gains and losses from property dispositions and extraordinary items, it provides a performance measure that, when compared year over year, reflects the impact to operations from trends in occupancy rates, rental rates, operating costs, development activities and interest costs, providing perspective not immediately apparent from net income.
We present FFO because we consider it an important supplemental measure of our operating performance and believe it is frequently used by securities analysts, investors and other interested parties in the evaluation of REITs, many of which present FFO when reporting their results. FFO is widely used by us and others in our industry to evaluate and price potential acquisition candidates. The National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts, Inc., of which we are a member, has encouraged its member companies to report their FFO as a supplemental, industry-wide standard measure of REIT operating performance. In addition, a percentage of bonus compensation to certain members of management is based on our FFO performance.
FFO has significant limitations as an analytical tool, and you should not consider it in isolation, or as a substitute for analysis of our results as reported under GAAP. Some of these limitations are:

• | FFO does not reflect our cash expenditures, or future requirements, for capital expenditures or contractual commitments;

• | FFO does not reflect changes in, or cash requirements for, our working capital needs;

• | Although depreciation and amortization are non-cash charges, the assets being depreciated and amortized will often have to be replaced in the future, and FFO does not reflect any cash requirements for such replacements;

• | FFO, which includes discontinued operations, may not be indicative of our ongoing operations; and

• | Other companies in our industry may calculate FFO differently than we do, limiting its usefulness as a comparative measure.

Because of these limitations, FFO should not be considered as a measure of discretionary cash available to us to invest in the growth of our business or our dividend paying capacity. We compensate for these limitations by relying primarily on our GAAP results and using FFO only supplementally.
43

Below is a reconciliation of net income to FFO (in thousands, except per share and per unit amounts):

|  | Three months ended March 31,
|  | 2013 |  | 2012
FUNDS FROM OPERATIONS |  |  |  |
Net income |  | $ | 16,229 |  |  | $ | 8,834 |
Adjusted for: |  |  |  |
Depreciation and amortization uniquely significant to real estate - consolidated |  | 22,043 |  |  | 25,301 |
Depreciation and amortization uniquely significant to real estate - unconsolidated joint ventures |  | 3,173 |  |  | 1,815 |
Funds from operations (FFO) |  | 41,445 |  |  | 35,950 |
FFO attributable to noncontrolling interests in other consolidated partnerships |  | (7 | ) |  | (2 | )
Allocation of FFO to participating securities |  | (425 | ) |  | (308 | )
Funds from operations available to common shareholders and noncontrolling interests in Operating Partnership |  | $ | 41,013 |  |  | $ | 35,640 |
Tanger Factory Outlet Centers, Inc.: |  |  |  |
Weighted average common shares outstanding (1) (2) |  | 98,798 |  |  | 98,690 |
Dilutive funds from operations per share |  | $ | 0.42 |  |  | $ | 0.36 |
Tanger Properties Limited Partnership: |  |  |  |
Weighted average Operating Partnership units outstanding (1) |  | 24,700 |  |  | 24,672 |
Dilutive funds from operations per unit |  | $ | 1.66 |  |  | $ | 1.44 |

(1) | Includes the dilutive effect of options, restricted shares not considered participating securities, and notional units.

(2) | Assumes the partnership units of the Operating Partnership held by the noncontrolling interests are exchanged for common shares of the Company. Each unit held by the Family Limited Partners is exchangeable for four of the Company's common shares, subject to certain limitations to preserve the Company's REIT status.

Adjusted Funds From Operations
We present Adjusted Funds From Operations ("AFFO") as a supplemental measure of our performance. We define AFFO as FFO further adjusted to eliminate the impact of certain items that we do not consider indicative of our ongoing operating performance. These further adjustments are itemized below. You are encouraged to evaluate these adjustments and the reasons we consider them appropriate for supplemental analysis. In evaluating AFFO you should be aware that in the future we may incur expenses that are the same as or similar to some of the adjustments in this presentation. Our presentation of AFFO should not be construed as an inference that our future results will be unaffected by unusual or non-recurring items.
We present AFFO because we believe it assists investors and analysts in comparing our performance across reporting periods on a consistent basis by excluding items that we do not believe are indicative of our core operating performance. In addition, we use AFFO, or some form of AFFO, when certain material, unplanned transactions occur, as a factor in evaluating management's performance when determining incentive compensation and to evaluate the effectiveness of our business strategies.
AFFO has limitations as an analytical tool. Some of these limitations are:

• | AFFO does not reflect our cash expenditures, or future requirements, for capital expenditures or contractual commitments;

• | AFFO does not reflect changes in, or cash requirements for, our working capital needs;

• | Although depreciation and amortization are non-cash charges, the assets being depreciated and amortized will often have to be replaced in the future, and AFFO does not reflect any cash requirements for such replacements;

• | AFFO does not reflect the impact of certain cash charges resulting from matters we consider not to be indicative of our ongoing operations; and

• | Other companies in our industry may calculate AFFO differently than we do, limiting its usefulness as a comparative measure.

44

Because of these limitations, AFFO should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for performance measures calculated in accordance with GAAP. We compensate for these limitations by relying primarily on our GAAP results and using AFFO only supplementally.
Below is a reconciliation of FFO to AFFO (in thousands, except per share and per unit amounts):

|  | Three months ended March 31,
|  | 2013 |  | 2012
ADJUSTED FUNDS FROM OPERATIONS |  |  |  |
Funds from operations |  | $ | 41,445 |  |  | $ | 35,950 |
Adjusted for non-core items: |  |  |  |
Acquisition costs |  | 179 |  |  | — |
AFFO adjustments from unconsolidated joint ventures (1) |  | 211 |  |  | 686 |
Adjusted funds from operations (AFFO) |  | 41,835 |  |  | 36,636 |
AFFO attributable to noncontrolling interests in other consolidated partnerships |  | (7 | ) |  | (2 | )
Allocation of AFFO to participating securities |  | (430 | ) |  | (314 | )
Adjusted funds from operations available to common shareholders and noncontrolling interests in Operating Partnership |  | $ | 41,398 |  |  | $ | 36,320 |
Tanger Factory Outlet Centers, Inc.: |  |  |  |
Weighted average common shares outstanding (2) (3) |  | 98,798 |  |  | 98,690 |
Dilutive adjusted funds from operations per share |  | $ | 0.42 |  |  | $ | 0.37 |
Tanger Properties Limited Partnership: |  |  |  |
Weighted average Operating Partnership units outstanding (2) |  | 24,700 |  |  | 24,672 |
Dilutive adjusted funds from operations per unit |  | $ | 1.68 |  |  | $ | 1.47 |

(1) | Includes our share of acquisition costs, abandoned development costs and gain on early extinguishment of debt from unconsolidated joint ventures.

(2) | Includes the dilutive effect of options, restricted shares not considered participating securities, and notional units.

(3) | Assumes the partnership units of the Operating Partnership held by the noncontrolling interest are exchanged for common shares of the Company.

Same Center Net Operating Income
We present Same Center Net Operating Income (“NOI”) as a supplemental measure of our performance. We define Net Operating Income ("NOI") as total operating revenues less property operating expenses. Same Center NOI represents the NOI for the properties that were operational for the entire portion of both comparable reporting periods and which were not acquired, expanded, renovated or subject to a material, non-recurring event, such as a natural disaster, during the comparable reporting periods. We believe that NOI and Same Center NOI provide useful information to our investors and analysts about our financial and operating performance because it provides a performance measure of the revenues and expenses directly involved in owning and operating real estate assets and provides a perspective not immediately apparent from net income or FFO. Because Same Center NOI excludes the change in NOI from properties developed, redeveloped, acquired, sold and expanded, it highlights operating trends such as occupancy levels, rental rates and operating costs on properties that were operational for both comparable periods. Other REITs may use different methodologies for calculating Same Center NOI, and accordingly, our Same Center NOI may not be comparable to other REITs.
Same Center NOI should not be viewed as an alternative measure of the Company's financial performance since it does not reflect the operations of the Company's entire portfolio, nor does it reflect the impact of general and administrative expenses, acquisition-related expenses, interest expense, depreciation and amortization costs, other non-property income and losses, and the level of capital expenditures and leasing costs necessary to maintain the operating performance of the Company's properties, or trends in development and construction activities which are significant economic costs and activities that could materially impact the Company's results from operations.
45

Below is a reconciliation of income before equity in losses of unconsolidated joint ventures to Same Center NOI (in thousands):

|  | Three months ended March 31,
|  | 2013 |  | 2012
SAME CENTER NET OPERATING INCOME |  |  |  |
Income before equity in losses of unconsolidated joint ventures |  | $ | 15,639 |  |  | $ | 10,286 |
Interest expense |  | 12,876 |  |  | 12,334 |
Operating income |  | 28,515 |  |  | 22,620 |
Adjusted to exclude: |  |  |  |
Depreciation and amortization |  | 22,288 |  |  | 25,515 |
Other non-property income and losses |  | (1,319 | ) |  | (915 | )
Acquisition costs |  | 179 |  |  | — |
General and administrative expenses |  | 9,572 |  |  | 10,020 |
Property net operating income |  | 59,235 |  |  | 57,240 |
Less: non-cash adjustments and termination rents (1) |  | (1,380 | ) |  | (1,924 | )
Property net operating income - cash basis |  | 57,855 |  |  | 55,316 |
Less: non-same center NOI (2) |  | (3,239 | ) |  | (2,758 | )
Total same center NOI - cash basis |  | $ | 54,616 |  |  | $ | 52,558 |

(1) | Non-cash items include straight-line rent, net above and below market rent amortization and gains or losses on outparcel sales.

(2) | Centers excluded from same center NOI are as follows:

a. | Gonzales - Expansion to open in April 2013.

b. | Locust Grove - Expansion opened during April 2012.

ECONOMIC CONDITIONS AND OUTLOOK
The majority of our leases contain provisions designed to mitigate the impact of inflation. Such provisions include clauses for the escalation of base rent and clauses enabling us to receive percentage rentals based on tenants' gross sales (above predetermined levels, which we believe often are lower than traditional retail industry standards) which generally increase as prices rise. Most of the leases require the tenant to pay their share of property operating expenses, including common area maintenance, real estate taxes, insurance and advertising and promotion, thereby reducing exposure to increases in costs and operating expenses resulting from inflation.
While we believe outlet stores will continue to be a profitable and fundamental distribution channel for many brand name manufacturers, some retail formats are more successful than others. As typical in the retail industry, certain tenants have closed, or will close, certain stores by terminating their lease prior to its natural expiration or as a result of filing for protection under bankruptcy laws.
Due to the relat ively short-term nature of our tenants' leases, a significant portion of the leases in our portfolio come up for renewal each year. As of January 1, 2013, we had approximately 1.9 million square feet, or 18%, of our consolidated portfolio coming up for renewal during 2013. During the first three months of 2013, we renewed approximately 1.1 million square feet of this space at a 18.0% increase in the average base rental rate compared to the expiring rate. We also re-tenanted approximately 294,000 square feet at a 32.2% increase in the average base rental rate. In addition, we continue to attract and retain additional tenants. However, there can be no assurance that we can achieve similar increases in base rental rates. In addition, if we were unable to successfully renew or release a significant amount of this space on favorable economic terms, the loss in rent could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations.
Our outlet centers typically include well-known, national, brand name companies. By maintaining a broad base of well-known tenants and a geographically diverse portfolio of properties located across the United States, we reduce our operating and leasing risks. No one tenant (including affiliates) accounts for more than 8% of our square feet or 7% of our combined base and percentage rental revenues. Accordingly, we do not expect any material adverse impact on our results of operations and financial condition as a result of leases to be renewed or stores to be released. As of March 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively, occupancy at our consolidated centers was 98% and 97%.
46

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
Market Risk
We are exposed to various market risks, including changes in interest rates. Market risk is the potential loss arising from adverse changes in market rates and prices, such as interest rates. We may periodically enter into certain interest rate protection and interest rate swap agreements to effectively convert floating rate debt to a fixed rate basis. We do not enter into derivatives or other financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes. As of March 31, 2013, we were not a party to any interest rate protection agreements.
As of March 31, 2013, approximately 39% of our outstanding debt had a variable interest rate and was therefore subject to market fluctuations. An increase in the LIBOR rate of 100 basis points would result in an increase of approximately $4.2 million in interest expense on an annual basis. The information presented herein is merely an estimate and has limited predictive value. As a result, the ultimate effect upon our operating results of interest rate fluctuations will depend on the interest rate exposures that arise during the period, our hedging strategies at that time and future changes in the level of interest rates.
The estimated fair value of our debt, consisting of senior unsecured notes, unsecured term loans, secured mortgages and unsecured lines of credit, at March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012 was $1.2 billion and $1.2 billion, respectively, and its recorded value was $1.1 billion and $1.1 billion, respectively. A 100 basis point increase from prevailing interest rates at March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012 would result in a decrease in fair value of total debt of approximately $35.2 million and $34.8 million, respectively. Fair values were determined, based on level 2 inputs, using discounted analysis with an interest rate or credit spread similar to that of current market borrowing arrangements.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Tanger Factory Outlet Centers, Inc. Controls and Procedures
The Company's management carried out an evaluation, with the participation of the Company's Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)) as of March 31, 2013. Based on this evaluation, the Company's Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, have concluded the Company's disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of March 31, 2013. There were no changes to the Company's internal controls over financial reporting during the quarter ended March 31, 2013, that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company's internal control over financial reporting.
Tanger Properties Limited Partnership Controls and Procedures
The management of the Operating Partnership's general partner carried out an evaluation, with the participation of the Chief Executive Officer and the Vice-President and Treasurer (Principal Financial Officer) of the Operating Partnership's general partner, of the effectiveness of the Operating Partnership's disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) as of March 31, 2013. Based on this evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer of the Operating Partnership's general partner, and the Vice-President and Treasurer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) of the Operating Partnership's general partner, have concluded the Operating Partnership's disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of March 31, 2013. There were no changes to the Operating Partnership's internal controls over financial reporting during the quarter ended March 31, 2013, that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Operating Partnership's internal control over financial reporting.
47

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
Neither the Company nor the Operating Partnership is presently involved in any material litigation nor, to their knowledge, is any material litigation threatened against the Company or the Operating Partnership or its properties, other than routine litigation arising in the ordinary course of business and which is expected to be covered by liability insurance.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
There have been no material changes from the risk factors disclosed in the "Risk Factors" section of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012.
Item 4.Mine Safety Disclosures
Not applicable
48

Item 6. Exhibits

Exhibit Number |  | Exhibit Descriptions
10.1 * |  |  | Form of 2013 Outperformance Plan Notional Unit Award agreement.
12.1 |  |  | Company's Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges.
12.2 |  |  | Operating Partnership's Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges.
31.1 |  |  | Principal Executive Officer Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes - Oxley Act of 2002 for Tanger Factory Outlet Centers, Inc.
31.2 |  |  | Principal Financial Officer Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes - Oxley Act of 2002 for Tanger Factory Outlet Centers, Inc.
31.3 |  |  | Principal Executive Officer Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes - Oxley Act of 2002 for Tanger Properties Limited Partnership.
31.4 |  |  | Principal Financial Officer Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes - Oxley Act of 2002 for Tanger Properties Limited Partnership.
32.1 |  |  | Principal Executive Officer Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes - Oxley Act of 2002 for Tanger Factory Outlet Centers, Inc.
32.2 |  |  | Principal Financial Officer Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes - Oxley Act of 2002 for Tanger Factory Outlet Centers, Inc.
32.3 |  |  | Principal Executive Officer Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes - Oxley Act of 2002 for Tanger Properties Limited Partnership.
32.4 |  |  | Principal Financial Officer Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes - Oxley Act of 2002 for Tanger Properties Limited Partnership.
101 |  |  | The following financial statements from Tanger Factory Outlet Centers, Inc. and Tanger Properties Limited Partnership's dual Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2013, formatted in XBRL: (i) Consolidated Balance Sheets (unaudited), (ii) Consolidated Statements of Operations (unaudited), (iii) Consolidated Statements of Other Comprehensive Income (unaudited), (iv) Consolidated Statements of Equity (unaudited), (v) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (unaudited), and (vi) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited).
* |  |  | Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.

49

SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
DATE: May 9, 2013

TANGER FACTORY OUTLET CENTERS, INC.
By: | /s/ Frank C. Marchisello, Jr.
| Frank C. Marchisello, Jr.
| Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
TANGER PROPERTIES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
By: TANGER GP TRUST, its sole general partner
By: | /s/ Frank C. Marchisello, Jr.
| Frank C. Marchisello, Jr.
| Vice President and Treasurer

50

Exhibit Index

Exhibit Number |  | Exhibit Descriptions
10.1 * |  |  | Form of 2013 Outperformance Plan Notional Unit Award agreement.
12.1 |  |  | Company's Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges.
12.2 |  |  | Operating Partnership's Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges.
31.1 |  |  | Principal Executive Officer Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes - Oxley Act of 2002 for Tanger Factory Outlet Centers, Inc.
31.2 |  |  | Principal Financial Officer Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes - Oxley Act of 2002 for Tanger Factory Outlet Centers, Inc.
31.3 |  |  | Principal Executive Officer Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes - Oxley Act of 2002 for Tanger Properties Limited Partnership.
31.4 |  |  | Principal Financial Officer Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes - Oxley Act of 2002 for Tanger Properties Limited Partnership.
32.1 |  |  | Principal Executive Officer Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes - Oxley Act of 2002 for Tanger Factory Outlet Centers, Inc.
32.2 |  |  | Principal Financial Officer Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes - Oxley Act of 2002 for Tanger Factory Outlet Centers, Inc.
32.3 |  |  | Principal Executive Officer Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes - Oxley Act of 2002 for Tanger Properties Limited Partnership.
32.4 |  |  | Principal Financial Officer Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes - Oxley Act of 2002 for Tanger Properties Limited Partnership.
101 |  |  | The following financial statements from Tanger Factory Outlet Centers, Inc. and Tanger Properties Limited Partnership's dual Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2013, formatted in XBRL: (i) Consolidated Balance Sheets (unaudited), (ii) Consolidated Statements of Operations (unaudited), (iii) Consolidated Statements of Other Comprehensive income (unaudited), (iv) Consolidated Statements of Equity (unaudited), (v) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (unaudited), and (vi) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited).
* |  |  | Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.

51