10-Q 1 c803-20170228x10q.htm 10-Q

﻿

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

﻿

FORM 10-Q

﻿

﻿ |
☒ | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

﻿

For the quarterly period ended February 28, 2017

OR

﻿

﻿ |
☐ | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

﻿

For the transition period from to

﻿

COMMISSION FILE NUMBER 0-22793

PriceSmart, Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

﻿ |  |
Delaware |  | 33-0628530
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |  | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

﻿

9740 Scranton Road, San Diego, CA 92121

(Address of principal executive offices)

﻿

(858) 404-8800

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

﻿
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports); and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

﻿

﻿

﻿ |
Yes ☒ | No ☐

﻿

﻿

﻿
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

﻿

﻿

﻿ |
Yes ☒ | No ☐

﻿

﻿

﻿
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

﻿

﻿

﻿ |  |  |
Large accelerated filer ☒ | Accelerated filer ☐ | Non-accelerated filer ☐ | Smaller Reporting Company ☐

﻿

﻿

﻿
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

﻿

﻿

﻿ |
Yes ☐ | No ☒

﻿

The registrant had 30,398,096 shares of its common stock, par value $0.0001 per share, outstanding at March 31, 2017.

﻿

PRIC ESMART, INC.

﻿

INDEX TO FORM 10-Q

﻿

﻿ |  |
﻿ |  | Page
﻿PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION |
﻿ITEM 1. | FINANCIAL STATEMENTS | 1
﻿ | CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AS OF FEBRUARY 28, 201 7 (UNAUDITED) AND AUGUST 31, 2016 | 2
﻿ | CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME FOR THE THREE AND SIX MONTHS ENDED FEBRUARY 28, 201 7 AND FEBRUARY 29, 201 6 - UNAUDITED | 4
﻿ | CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COM PREHENSIVE INCOME FOR THE THREE AND SIX MONTHS ENDED FEBRUARY 28, 201 7 AND FEBRUARY 29, 201 6 - UNAUDITED | 5
﻿ | CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EQUITY FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED FEBRUARY 28, 201 7 AND FEBRUARY 29, 201 6 - UNAUDITED | 6
﻿ | CONSOLIDATED STAT EMENTS OF CASH FLOWS FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED FEBRUARY 28, 201 7 AND FEBRUARY 29, 201 6 - UNAUDITED | 7
﻿ | NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - UNAUDITED | 8
﻿ITEM 2. | MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS | 28
﻿ITEM 3. | QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK | 51
﻿ITEM 4. | CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES | 53
﻿PART II - OTHER INFORMATION |
﻿ITEM 1. | LEGAL PROCEEDINGS | 54
﻿ITEM 1A. | RISK FACTORS | 54
﻿ITEM 2. | UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS | 54
﻿ITEM 3. | DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES | 55
﻿ITEM 4. | MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES | 55
﻿ITEM 5. | OTHER INFORMATION | 55
﻿ITEM 6. | EXHIBITS | 56

﻿

i

Table of Contents

PA RT I—FINANCIAL INFORMATION

﻿

I TEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

﻿

PriceSmart, Inc.’s (“PriceSmart,” "we" or the “Company”) unaudited consolidated balance sheet as of February 28, 2017 and the consolidated balance sheet as of August 31, 2016, the unaudited consolidated statements of income for the three and six months ended February 28, 2017 and February 29, 2016, the unaudited consolidated statements of comprehensive income for the three and six months ended February 28, 2017 and February 29, 2016, the unaudited consolidated statements of equity for the six months ended February 28, 2017 and February 29, 2016, and the unaudited consolidated statements of cash flows for the six months ended February 28, 2017 and February 29, 2016, are included herein. Also included herein are the notes to the unaudited consolidated financial statements.

1

Table of Contents

PRIC ESMART, INC.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE DATA)

﻿

﻿

﻿ |  |  |  |  |  |
﻿ |  |  |  |  |  |
﻿ |  | February 28, |  |  |
﻿ |  | 2017 |  | August 31,
﻿ |  | (Unaudited) |  | 2016
ASSETS |  |  |  |  |  |
Current Assets: |  |  |  |  |  |
Cash and cash equivalents |  | $ | 181,990 |  | $ | 199,522
Short-term restricted cash |  |  | 816 |  |  | 518
Receivables, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $7 as of February 28, 2017 and August 31, 2016, respectively |  |  | 6,384 |  |  | 7,464
Merchandise inventories |  |  | 296,984 |  |  | 282,907
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |  |  | 20,922 |  |  | 22,143
Total current assets |  |  | 507,096 |  |  | 512,554
Long-term restricted cash |  |  | 2,709 |  |  | 2,676
Property and equipment, net |  |  | 535,479 |  |  | 473,045
Goodwill |  |  | 35,692 |  |  | 35,637
Deferred tax assets |  |  | 12,251 |  |  | 12,258
Other non-current assets (includes $3,332 and $3,224 as of February 28, 2017 and August 31, 2016, respectively, for the fair value of derivative instruments) |  |  | 52,966 |  |  | 49,798
Investment in unconsolidated affiliates |  |  | 10,759 |  |  | 10,767
Total Assets |  | $ | 1,156,952 |  | $ | 1,096,735
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY |  |  |  |  |  |
Current Liabilities: |  |  |  |  |  |
Short-term borrowings |  | $ | 6,561 |  | $ | 16,534
Accounts payable |  |  | 265,756 |  |  | 267,173
Accrued salaries and benefits |  |  | 17,181 |  |  | 19,606
Deferred membership income |  |  | 22,921 |  |  | 20,920
Income taxes payable |  |  | 5,933 |  |  | 4,226
Other accrued expenses (includes $87 and $110 as of February 28, 2017 and August 31, 2016, respectively, for the fair value of foreign currency forward contracts) |  |  | 22,620 |  |  | 24,880
Dividends payable |  |  | 10,643 |  |  | —
Long-term debt, current portion |  |  | 14,623 |  |  | 14,565
Total current liabilities |  |  | 366,238 |  |  | 367,904
Deferred tax liability |  |  | 1,693 |  |  | 1,760
Long-term portion of deferred rent |  |  | 8,961 |  |  | 8,961
Long-term income taxes payable, net of current portion |  |  | 891 |  |  | 970
Long-term debt, net of current portion |  |  | 101,942 |  |  | 73,542
Other long-term liabilities (includes $665 and $1,514 for the fair value of derivative instruments and $4,868 and $4,013 for post employment plans as of February 28, 2017 and August 31, 2016, respectively) |  |  | 5,533 |  |  | 5,527
Total Liabilities |  |  | 485,258 |  |  | 458,664

﻿

2

Table of Contents

﻿

﻿ |  |  |  |  |  |
﻿ |  |  |  |  |  |
Equity: |  |  |  |  |  |
Common stock $0.0001 par value, 45,000,000 shares authorized; 31,264,387 and 31,237,658 shares issued and 30,404,645 and 30,401,307 shares outstanding (net of treasury shares) as of February 28, 2017 and August 31, 2016, respectively |  |  | 3 |  |  | 3
Additional paid-in capital |  |  | 417,776 |  |  | 412,369
Tax benefit from stock-based compensation |  |  | 11,534 |  |  | 11,321
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |  |  | (104,811) |  |  | (103,951)
Retained earnings |  |  | 381,864 |  |  | 351,060
Less: treasury stock at cost, 859,742 shares and 836,351 shares as of February 28, 2017 and August 31, 2016, respectively |  |  | (34,672) |  |  | (32,731)
Total Equity |  |  | 671,694 |  |  | 638,071
Total Liabilities and Equity |  | $ | 1,156,952 |  | $ | 1,096,735

﻿

See accompanying notes.

3

Table of Contents

PRICES MART, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

(UNAUDITED—AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)

﻿

﻿

﻿

﻿ |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
﻿ |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
﻿ |  | Three Months Ended |  | Six Months Ended
﻿ |  | February 28, |  | February 29, |  | February 28, |  | February 29,
﻿ |  | 2017 |  | 2016 |  | 2017 |  | 2016
Revenues: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Net warehouse club sales |  | $ | 772,273 |  | $ | 758,987 |  | $ | 1,488,352 |  | $ | 1,449,818
Export sales |  |  | 8,172 |  |  | 6,549 |  |  | 18,906 |  |  | 14,781
Membership income |  |  | 11,833 |  |  | 11,285 |  |  | 23,543 |  |  | 22,751
Other income |  |  | 1,018 |  |  | 1,110 |  |  | 2,067 |  |  | 2,512
Total revenues |  |  | 793,296 |  |  | 777,931 |  |  | 1,532,868 |  |  | 1,489,862
Operating expenses: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Cost of goods sold: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Net warehouse club |  |  | 659,802 |  |  | 651,500 |  |  | 1,268,292 |  |  | 1,241,683
Export |  |  | 7,761 |  |  | 6,225 |  |  | 17,942 |  |  | 14,057
Selling, general and administrative: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Warehouse club operations |  |  | 67,784 |  |  | 64,763 |  |  | 133,210 |  |  | 125,603
General and administrative |  |  | 18,212 |  |  | 16,184 |  |  | 35,014 |  |  | 31,647
Pre-opening expenses |  |  | — |  |  | 71 |  |  | (113) |  |  | 376
Loss/(gain) on disposal of assets |  |  | 335 |  |  | 52 |  |  | 742 |  |  | 65
Total operating expenses |  |  | 753,894 |  |  | 738,795 |  |  | 1,455,087 |  |  | 1,413,431
Operating income |  |  | 39,402 |  |  | 39,136 |  |  | 77,781 |  |  | 76,431
Other income (expense): |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Interest income |  |  | 549 |  |  | 280 |  |  | 1,051 |  |  | 458
Interest expense |  |  | (1,644) |  |  | (1,536) |  |  | (3,298) |  |  | (2,909)
Other income (expense), net |  |  | 915 |  |  | (552) |  |  | (13) |  |  | (796)
Total other income (expense) |  |  | (180) |  |  | (1,808) |  |  | (2,260) |  |  | (3,247)
Income before provision for income taxes and income (loss) of unconsolidated affiliates |  |  | 39,222 |  |  | 37,328 |  |  | 75,521 |  |  | 73,184
Provision for income taxes |  |  | (11,989) |  |  | (11,815) |  |  | (23,426) |  |  | (23,945)
Income (loss) of unconsolidated affiliates |  |  | (14) |  |  | 429 |  |  | (7) |  |  | 375
Net income |  |  | 27,219 |  | $ | 25,942 |  | $ | 52,088 |  |  | 49,614
Net income per share available for distribution: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Basic net income per share |  | $ | 0.90 |  | $ | 0.85 |  | $ | 1.72 |  | $ | 1.63
Diluted net income per share |  | $ | 0.90 |  | $ | 0.85 |  | $ | 1.72 |  | $ | 1.63
Shares used in per share computations: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Basic |  |  | 30,004 |  |  | 29,914 |  |  | 29,993 |  |  | 29,902
Diluted |  |  | 30,008 |  |  | 29,919 |  |  | 29,997 |  |  | 29,907
Dividends per share |  | $ | 0.70 |  | $ | 0.70 |  | $ | 0.70 |  | $ | 0.70

﻿

See accompanying notes.

4

Table of Contents

PRICES MART, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

(UNAUDITED—AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS)

﻿

﻿

﻿ |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
﻿ |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
﻿ |  | Three Months Ended |  | Six Months Ended
﻿ |  | February 28, |  | February 29, |  | February 28, |  | February 29,
﻿ |  | 2017 |  | 2016 |  | 2017 |  | 2016
Net income |  | $ | 27,219 |  | $ | 25,942 |  | $ | 52,088 |  | $ | 49,614
Other Comprehensive Income, net of tax: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Foreign currency translation adjustments (1) |  | $ | 9,237 |  | $ | (10,420) |  | $ | (1,629) |  | $ | (10,892)
Defined benefit pension plan: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Amortization of prior service cost and actuarial gains included in net periodic pensions cost |  |  | (7) |  |  | (4) |  |  | (14) |  |  | (8)
Total defined benefit pension plan |  |  | (7) |  |  | (4) |  |  | (14) |  |  | (8)
Derivative instruments: (2) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Unrealized gains/(losses) on change in fair value of interest rate swaps |  |  | 291 |  |  | (211) |  |  | 783 |  |  | (331)
Total derivative instruments |  |  | 291 |  |  | (211) |  |  | 783 |  |  | (331)
Other comprehensive income (loss) |  |  | 9,521 |  |  | (10,635) |  |  | (860) |  |  | (11,231)
Comprehensive income |  | $ | 36,740 |  | $ | 15,307 |  | $ | 51,228 |  | $ | 38,383

﻿

| (1) |  | Translation adjustments arising in translating the financial statements of a foreign entity have no effect on the income taxes of that foreign entity. They may, however, affect: (a) the amount, measured in the parent entity's reporting currency, of withholding taxes assessed on dividends paid to the parent entity and (b) the amount of taxes assessed on the parent entity by the government of its country. The Company has determined that the reinvestment of earnings of its foreign subsidiaries are indefinite because of the long-term nature of the Company's foreign investment plans. Therefore, deferred taxes are not provided for on translation adjustments related to non-remitted earnings of the Company's foreign subsidiaries.

| (2) |  | See Note 7 - Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities.

﻿

See accompanying notes.

5

Table of Contents

PRI CESMART, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EQUITY

(UNAUDITED—AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS)

﻿

﻿

﻿ |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
﻿ |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
﻿ |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Tax Benefit |  | Accumulated |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
﻿ |  |  |  |  |  |  | Additional |  | From |  | Other |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
﻿ |  | Common Stock |  | Paid-in |  | Stock Based |  | Comprehensive |  | Retained |  | Treasury Stock |  | Total
﻿ |  | Shares |  | Amount |  | Capital |  | Compensation |  | Income(Loss) |  | Earnings |  | Shares |  | Amount |  | Equity
Balance at August 31, 2015 |  | 30,978 |  | $ | 3 |  | $ | 403,168 |  | $ | 10,711 |  | $ | (101,512) |  | $ | 283,611 |  | 793 |  | $ | (29,397) |  | $ | 566,584
Purchase of treasury stock |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  | 27 |  |  | (1,956) |  |  | (1,956)
Issuance of restricted stock award |  | 208 |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | —
Exercise of stock options |  | 4 |  |  | — |  |  | 80 |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 80
Stock-based compensation |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 4,578 |  |  | 558 |  |  | — |  |  | — |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 5,136
Dividend paid to stockholders |  | — |  |  |  |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | (10,629) |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | (10,629)
Dividend payable to stockholders |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | (10,629) |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | (10,629)
Net income |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 49,614 |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 49,614
Other comprehensive income (loss) |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | (11,231) |  |  | — |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | (11,231)
Balance at February 29, 2016 |  | 31,190 |  | $ | 3 |  | $ | 407,826 |  | $ | 11,269 |  | $ | (112,743) |  | $ | 311,967 |  | 820 |  | $ | (31,353) |  | $ | 586,969
﻿ |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Balance at August 31, 2016 |  | 31,238 |  | $ | 3 |  | $ | 412,369 |  | $ | 11,321 |  | $ | (103,951) |  | $ | 351,060 |  | 836 |  | $ | (32,731) |  | $ | 638,071
Purchase of treasury stock |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  | 24 |  |  | (1,941) |  |  | (1,941)
Issuance of restricted stock award |  | 23 |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | —
Forfeiture of restricted stock awards |  | (2) |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | —
Exercise of stock options |  | 5 |  |  | — |  |  | 229 |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 229
Stock-based compensation |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 5,178 |  |  | 213 |  |  | — |  |  | — |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 5,391
Dividend paid to stockholders |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | (10,641) |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | (10,641)
Dividend payable to stockholders |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | (10,643) |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | (10,643)
Net income |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 52,088 |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 52,088
Other comprehensive income (loss) |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | (860) |  |  | — |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | (860)
Balance at February 28, 2017 |  | 31,264 |  | $ | 3 |  | $ | 417,776 |  | $ | 11,534 |  | $ | (104,811) |  | $ | 381,864 |  | 860 |  | $ | (34,672) |  | $ | 671,694

﻿

See accompanying notes.

6

Table of Contents

PRI CESMART, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(UNAUDITED—AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS)

﻿

﻿

﻿ |  |  |  |  |  |
﻿ |  |  |  |  |  |
﻿ |  | Six Months Ended
﻿ |  | February 28, |  | February 29,
﻿ |  | 2017 |  | 2016
Operating Activities: |  |  |  |  |  |
Net income |  | $ | 52,088 |  | $ | 49,614
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: |  |  |  |  |  |
Depreciation and amortization |  |  | 22,562 |  |  | 18,732
(Gain)/loss on sale of property and equipment |  |  | 742 |  |  | 65
Deferred income taxes |  |  | (1,412) |  |  | 16
Excess tax benefit on stock-based compensation |  |  | (213) |  |  | (558)
Equity in (gains) losses of unconsolidated affiliates |  |  | 7 |  |  | (375)
Stock-based compensation |  |  | 5,178 |  |  | 4,578
Change in operating assets and liabilities: |  |  |  |  |  |
Receivables, prepaid expenses and other current assets, non-current assets, accrued salaries and benefits, deferred membership income and other accruals |  |  | 386 |  |  | (3,824)
Merchandise inventories |  |  | (14,077) |  |  | 7,074
Accounts payable |  |  | (817) |  |  | (5,742)
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities |  |  | 64,444 |  |  | 69,580
Investing Activities: |  |  |  |  |  |
Additions to property and equipment |  |  | (87,020) |  |  | (32,177)
Deposits for land purchase option agreements |  |  | (300) |  |  | (75)
Proceeds from disposal of property and equipment |  |  | 181 |  |  | 129
Investment in joint ventures |  |  | — |  |  | (119)
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities |  |  | (87,139) |  |  | (32,242)
Financing Activities: |  |  |  |  |  |
Proceeds from long-term bank borrowings |  |  | 35,700 |  |  | 7,370
Repayment of long-term bank borrowings |  |  | (7,231) |  |  | (6,747)
Proceeds from short-term bank borrowings |  |  | — |  |  | 5,650
Repayment of short-term bank borrowings |  |  | (10,011) |  |  | (12,204)
Cash dividend payments |  |  | (10,641) |  |  | (10,629)
Excess tax benefit on stock-based compensation |  |  | 213 |  |  | 558
Purchase of treasury stock |  |  | (1,941) |  |  | (1,956)
Proceeds from exercise of stock options |  |  | 229 |  |  | 80
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |  |  | 6,318 |  |  | (17,878)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents |  |  | (1,155) |  |  | (3,524)
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |  |  | (17,532) |  |  | 15,936
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |  |  | 199,522 |  |  | 157,072
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |  | $ | 181,990 |  | $ | 173,008
﻿ |  |  |  |  |  |
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information: |  |  |  |  |  |
Dividends declared but not paid |  | $ | 10,643 |  | $ | 10,629

﻿

See accompanying notes.

﻿

7

Table of Contents

PRICESMART, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

February 28, 2017

N OTE 1 – COMPANY OVERVIEW AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION

﻿

PriceSmart, Inc.’s (“PriceSmart” or the “Company”) business consists primarily of international membership shopping warehouse clubs similar to, but smaller in size than, warehouse clubs in the United States. As of February 28, 2017, the Company had 39 consolidated warehouse clubs in operation in 12 countries and one U.S. territory (seven in Colombia; six in Costa Rica; five in Panama; four in Trinidad; three each in Guatemala, Honduras and the Dominican Republic; two each in El Salvador and Nicaragua; and one each in Aruba, Barbados, Jamaica, and the United States Virgin Islands), of which the Company owns 100% of the corresponding legal entities (see Note 2 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies). The Company opened a new warehouse club in Chia, Colombia in September 2016, fiscal year 2017, which the Company constructed on land acquired in May 2015, bringing the total of warehouse clubs operating in Colombia to seven. In April 2015, the Company acquired land in Managua, Nicaragua. The Company constructed and then opened a warehouse club on this site in Novemb er 2015. On December 4, 2015 the Company signed an option to acquire two properties and then swap them for 59,353 square feet of land adjacent to our San Pedro Sula warehouse club in Honduras. The Company exercised this option and comple ted the swap during May 2016. The Company used the acquired land to expand the parking lot for the San Pedro Sula warehouse club. T he expansion was completed in December 2016. The Company, on February 1, 2017, acquired land in Santa Ana, Costa Rica upon which the Company plans to construct a new warehouse club. The Company currently plans to open this new warehouse club in the fall of 2017. With the six warehouse clubs currently operating in Costa Rica, this new warehouse club will bring the number of PriceSmart warehouse clubs operating in Costa Rica to seven. The Company continues to explore other potential sites for future warehouse clubs in Central America, the Caribbean and Colombia.

﻿

Basis of Presentation - The interim consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the instructions to Form 10-Q for interim financial reporting pursuant to the rules and regulations of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"). These interim consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2016 (the “2016 Form 10-K”). The interim consolidated financial statements include the accounts of PriceSmart, Inc., a Delaware corporation, and its subsidiaries. Inter-company transactions between the Company and its subsidiaries have been eliminated in consolidation.

﻿

The Company has evaluated subsequent events through the date and time these financial statements were issued.

8

Table of Contents

PRICESMART, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

﻿

﻿

NOTE 2 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

﻿

Principles of Consolidation – The interim consolidated financial statements of the Company included herein include the assets, liabilities and results of operations of the Company’s wholly owned subsidiaries and the Company's investment in, and the Company's share of the income (loss) of, joint ventures recorded under the equity method. All significant inter-company accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. The interim consolidated financial statements have been prepared by the Company pursuant to the rules and regulations of the SEC and reflect all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments) that are, in the opinion of management, necessary to fairly present the financial position, results of operations, and cash flows for the periods presented. The results for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results for the full year. As of February 28, 2017, all of the Company's subsidiaries were wholly owned. Additionally, the Company's ownership interest in real estate development joint ventures as of February 28, 2017 is listed below:

﻿

﻿

﻿ |  |  |  |  |  |  |
﻿ |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Real Estate Development Joint Ventures |  | Countries |  | Ownership |  | Basis of Presentation
GolfPark Plaza, S.A. |  | Panama |  | 50.0 | % |  | Equity(1)
Price Plaza Alajuela PPA, S.A. |  | Costa Rica |  | 50.0 | % |  | Equity(1)

﻿

| (1) |  | Joint venture interests are recorded as investment in unconsolidated affiliates on the consolidated balance sheets.

﻿

The Company determines whether any of the joint ventures in which it has made investments is a Variable Interest Entity (“VIE”) at the start of each new venture and if a reconsideration event has occurred. At this time, the Company also considers whether it must consolidate a VIE and/or disclose information about its involvement in a VIE. A reporting entity must consolidate a VIE if that reporting entity has a variable interest (or combination of variable interests) that will absorb a majority of the VIE's expected losses, receive a majority of the VIE's expected residual returns, or both. A reporting entity must consider the rights and obligations conveyed by its variable interests and the relationship of its variable interests with variable interests held by other parties to determine whether its variable interests will absorb a majority of a VIE's expected losses, receive a majority of the VIE's expected residual returns, or both. The reporting entity that consolidates a VIE is called the primary beneficiary of that VIE.

﻿

Due to the initial nature of the joint ventures and the continued commitments for additional financing, the Company determined these joint ventures are VIEs. Since all rights, obligations and the power to direct the activities of a VIE that most significantly impact the VIE's economic performance is shared equally by both parties within each joint venture, the Company has determined that it is not the primary beneficiary of the VIEs and, therefore, has accounted for these entities under the equity method. Under the equity method, the Company's investments in unconsolidated affiliates are initially recorded as an investment in the stock of an investee at cost and are adjusted for the carrying amount of the investment to recognize the investor's share of the earnings or losses of the investee after the date of the initial investment.

﻿

Use of Estimates – The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Tax Receivables – The Company pays Value Added Tax (“VAT”) or similar taxes (“input VAT”), income taxes, and other taxes within the normal course of its business in most of the countries in which it operates related to the procurement of merchandise and/or services it acquires and/or on sales and taxable income. The Company also collects VAT or similar taxes on behalf of the government (“output VAT”) for merchandise and/or services it sells. If the output VAT exceeds the input VAT, then the difference is remitted to the government, usually on a monthly basis. If the input VAT exceeds the output VAT, this creates a VAT receivable. In most countries where the Company operates, the governments have implemented additional collection procedures, such as requiring credit and debit card processors to remit a portion of sales processed via credit and debit card directly to the government as advance payments of VAT and/or income tax. In the case of VAT, these procedures alter the natural offset of input and output VAT and generally leave the Company with a net VAT receivable, forcing the Company to process significant refund claims on a recurring basis. With respect to income taxes paid, if the estimated income taxes paid or withheld exceed the actual income tax due, this creates an income tax receivable. The Company either requests a refund of these tax receivables or applies the balance to expected future tax payments. These refund or offset processes can take anywhere from several months to several years to complete.

﻿

In most countries where the Company operates, the tax refund process is defined and structured with regular refunds or offsets. However, in three countries there is either not a clearly defined process or the government has alleged there is not a

9

Table of Contents

PRICESMART, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

clearly defined process to allow the authorities to refund VAT receivables. The Company, together with its tax and legal advisers, is currently appealing these interpretations in court and expects to prevail. In one of these countries, where there is recent favorable jurisprudence, the government performed an audit to verify the amount of the VAT receivables as a required precursor to any refund. The balance of the VAT receivables in these countries was $8.7 million and $7.6 million as of February 28, 2017 and August 31, 2016, respectively. In another country in which the Company operates warehouse clubs, a new minimum income tax mechanism took effect in fiscal year 2015, which requires the Company to pay taxes based on a percentage of sales rather than income. As a result, the Company is making income tax payments substantially in excess of those it would expect to pay based on taxable income. The current rules (which the Company has challenged in court) do not clearly allow the Company to obtain a refund or to offset this excess income tax against other taxes. As of February 28, 2017, the Company had deferred tax assets of approximately $2.0 million in this country. Also, the Company had an income tax receivable balance of $3.5 million as of February 28, 2017 related to excess payments from fiscal years 2015, 2016 and 2017. The Company has not placed any type of allowance on the recoverability of these tax receivables or deferred tax assets, because the Company believes that it is more likely than not that it will ultimately succeed in its refund requests, related appeals and/or court challenge on this matter.

﻿

The Company's policy for classification and presentation of VAT receivables, income tax receivables and other tax receivables is as follows:

﻿

| · |  | Short-term VAT and Income tax receivables, recorded as Other current assets: This classification is used for any countries where the Company's subsidiary has generally demonstrated the ability to recover the VAT or income tax receivable within one year. The Company also classifies as short-term any approved refunds or credit notes to the extent that the Company expects to receive the refund or use the credit notes within one year.

﻿

| · |  | Long-term VAT and Income tax receivables, recorded as Other non-current assets: This classification is used for amounts not approved for refund or credit in countries where the Company's subsidiary has not demonstrated the ability to obtain refunds within one year and/or for amounts which are subject to outstanding disputes. An allowance is provided against VAT and income tax receivable balances in dispute when the Company does not expect to eventually prevail in its recovery. The Company does not currently have any allowances provided against VAT and income tax receivables.

﻿

The following table summarizes the VAT receivables reported by the Company (in thousands):

﻿

﻿

﻿ |  |  |  |  |  |
﻿ |  |  |  |  |  |
﻿ |  | February 28, |  | August 31,
﻿ |  | 2017 |  | 2016
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |  | $ | 1,702 |  | $ | 1,635
Other non-current assets |  |  | 34,060 |  |  | 32,502
Total amount of VAT receivable reported |  | $ | 35,762 |  | $ | 34,137

﻿

The following table summarizes the Income tax receivables reported by the Company (in thousands):

﻿

﻿

﻿ |  |  |  |  |  |
﻿ |  |  |  |  |  |
﻿ |  | February 28, |  | August 31,
﻿ |  | 2017 |  | 2016
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |  | $ | 4,756 |  | $ | 6,402
Other non-current assets |  |  | 12,037 |  |  | 10,376
Total amount of income tax receivable reported |  | $ | 16,793 |  | $ | 16,778

﻿

Merchandise Inventories – Merchandise inventories, which include merchandise for resale, are valued at the lower of cost (average cost) or market. The Company provides for estimated inventory losses and obsolescence between physical inventory counts on the basis of a percentage of sales. The provision is adjusted periodically to reflect the trend of actual physical inventory count results, with physical inventories occurring primarily in the second and fourth fiscal quarters. In addition, the Company may be required to take markdowns below the carrying cost of certain inventory to expedite the sale of such merchandise.

﻿

Stock Based Compensation – The Company offers three types of equity awards: stock options (“options”), restricted stock awards (“RSAs”) and restricted stock units (“RSUs”). Compensation related to options is accounted for by applying the valuation technique based on the Black-Scholes model. Compensation related to RSAs and RSUs is based on the fair market value at the time of grant with the application of an estimated forfeiture rate. The Company recognizes the compensation cost related to these awards over the requisite service period as determined by the grant, amortized ratably or on a straight line basis over the life of the grant. The Company utilizes “modified grant-date accounting” for true-ups due to actual forfeitures at the

10

Table of Contents

PRICESMART, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

vesting dates. The Company records the tax savings resulting from tax deductions in excess of expense for stock-based compensation as additional paid-in capital and the tax deficiency resulting from stock-based compensation in excess of the related tax deduction as a reduction in paid-in capital, based on the Tax Law Ordering method. In addition, the Company reflects the tax savings (deficiency) resulting from the taxation of stock-based compensation as a financing cash flow in its consolidated statement of cash flows, rather than as an operating cash flow.

﻿

RSAs have the same cash dividend and voting rights as other common stock and are considered to be currently issued and outstanding shares of common stock. Shares of common stock subject to RSUs are not issued nor outstanding until vested, and RSUs do not have the same dividend and voting rights as common stock. However, all outstanding RSUs have accompanying dividend equivalents, requiring payment to the employees and directors with unvested RSUs of amounts equal to the dividend they would have received had the shares of common stock underlying the RSUs been actually issued and outstanding. Payments of dividend equivalents to employees are recorded as compensation expense.

﻿

Fair Value Measurements – The Company measures the fair value for all financial and nonfinancial assets and liabilities that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the consolidated financial statements on a recurring or nonrecurring basis. The fair value of an asset is the price at which the asset could be sold in an orderly transaction between unrelated, knowledgeable and willing parties able to engage in the transaction. A liability’s fair value is defined as the amount that would be paid to transfer the liability to a new obligor in a transaction between such parties, not the amount that would be paid to settle the liability with the creditor.

﻿

The Company has established a three-tier fair value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring and revaluing fair value. These tiers include: Level 1, defined as observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets; Level 2, defined as inputs other than quoted prices in active markets that are either directly or indirectly observable; and Level 3, defined as unobservable inputs in which little or no market data exists, therefore requiring an entity to develop its own assumptions. The Company was not required to revalue any assets or liabilities utilizing Level 1 or Level 3 inputs at the balance sheet dates. The Company's Level 2 assets and liabilities revalued at the balance sheet dates, on a recurring basis, consisted of cash flow hedges (interest rate swaps and cross-currency interest rate swaps) and forward foreign exchange contracts. In addition, the Company utilizes Level 2 inputs in determining the fair value of long-term debt. The Company did not make any significant transfers in and out of Level 1 and Level 2 fair value tiers during the periods reported on herein.

﻿

Non-financial assets and liabilities are revalued and recognized at fair value subsequent to initial recognition when there is evidence of impairment. For the periods reported, no impairment of such non-financial assets was recorded.

﻿

The Company’s current financial assets and liabilities have fair values that approximate their carrying values. The Company’s long-term financial assets have fair values that approximate their carrying values. The Company’s long-term financial liabilities consist of long-term debt, which is recorded on the balance sheet at issuance price and adjusted for any applicable unamortized discounts or premiums and debt issuance costs. There have been no significant changes in fair market value of the Company’s current and long-term financial assets, and there have been no material changes to the valuation techniques utilized in the fair value measurement of assets and liabilities as disclosed in the Company’s 2016 Form 10-K.

﻿

Derivatives Instruments and Hedging Activities – The Company uses derivative financial instruments for hedging and non-trading purposes to manage its exposure to changes in interest and currency exchange rates. In using derivative financial instruments for the purpose of hedging the Company’s exposure to interest and currency exchange rate risks, the contractual terms of a hedged instrument closely mirror those of the hedged item, providing a high degree of risk reduction and correlation. Contracts that are effective at meeting the risk reduction and correlation criteria (effective hedge) are recorded using hedge accounting. If a derivative financial instrument is an effective hedge, changes in the fair value of the instrument will be offset in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) until the hedged item completes its contractual term. If any portion of the hedge is deemed ineffective, the change in fair value of the hedged assets or liabilities will be immediately recognized in earnings during the period. Instruments that do not meet the criteria for hedge accounting, or contracts for which the Company has not elected hedge accounting, are valued at fair value with unrealized gains or losses reported in earnings during the period of the change. The Company did not change valuation techniques utilized in the fair value measurement of assets and liabilities presented on the Company’s consolidated balance sheets from previous practice during the reporting period. The Company seeks to manage counterparty risk associated with these contracts by limiting transactions to counterparties with which the Company has an established banking relationship. There can be no assurance, however, that this practice effectively mitigates counterparty risk.

﻿

Cash Flow Instruments. The Company is a party to receive floating interest rate, pay fixed-rate interest rate swaps to hedge the interest rate risk of certain U.S. dollar denominated debt within its international subsidiaries. The swaps are designated as cash flow hedges of interest expense risk. These instruments are considered effective hedges and are recorded using hedge accounting. The Company is also a party to receive variable interest rate, pay fixed interest rate cross-currency interest rate swaps to hedge the interest rate and currency exposure associated with the expected payments of principal and interest of U.S.

11

Table of Contents

PRICESMART, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

denominated debt within its international subsidiaries whose functional currency is other than the U.S. dollar. The swaps are designated as cash flow hedges of the currency risk related to payments on the U.S. denominated debt. These instruments are also considered to be effective hedges and are recorded using hedge accounting. Under cash flow hedging, the effective portion of the fair value of the derivative, calculated as the net present value of the future cash flows, is deferred on the consolidated balance sheets in accumulated other comprehensive loss. If any portion of an interest rate swap is determined to be an ineffective hedge, the gains or losses from changes in fair value would be recorded directly in the consolidated statements of income. Amounts recorded in accumulated other comprehensive loss are released to earnings in the same period that the hedged transaction impacts consolidated earnings. See Note 7 - Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities for information on the fair value of interest rate swaps and cross-currency interest rate swaps as of February 28, 2017 and August 31, 2016.

﻿

Fair Value Instruments. The Company is exposed to foreign-currency exchange rate fluctuations in the normal course of business. This includes exposure to foreign-currency exchange rate fluctuations on U.S. dollar denominated liabilities within the Company’s international subsidiaries whose functional currency is other than the U.S. dollar. The Company manages these fluctuations, in part, through the use of non-deliverable forward foreign-exchange contracts that are intended to offset changes in cash flows attributable to currency exchange movements. The contracts are intended primarily to economically address exposure to U.S. dollar merchandise inventory expenditures made by the Company’s international subsidiaries whose functional currency is other than the U.S. dollar. Currently, these contracts are treated for accounting purposes as fair value instruments and do not qualify for derivative hedge accounting, and as such the Company does not apply derivative hedge accounting to record these transactions. As a result, these contracts are valued at fair value with unrealized gains or losses reported in earnings during the period of the change. The Company seeks to mitigate foreign-currency exchange-rate risk with the use of these contracts and does not intend to engage in speculative transactions. These contracts do not contain any credit-risk-related contingent features and are limited to less than one year in duration. See Note 7 - Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities for information on the fair value of open, unsettled forward foreign-exchange contracts as of February 28, 2017 and August 31, 2016.

Insurance Reimbursements – Receipts from insurance reimbursements up to the amount of the losses recognized are considered recoveries. These recoveries are accounted for when they are probable of receipt. Insurance recoveries are not recognized prior to the recognition of the related cost. Anticipated proceeds in excess of the amount of loss recognized are considered gains and are subject to gain contingency guidance. Anticipated proceeds in excess of a loss recognized in the financial statements are not recognized until all contingencies related to the insurance claim are resolved.

﻿

The Company’s Guatemala Pradera warehouse club experienced a fire in its merchandise receiving department during the early morning hours of June 4, 2015. No members or employees were in the warehouse club at the time. The fire was extinguished, but caused considerable smoke and some fire damage. The warehouse club was closed for nine days and reopened on June 13, 2015. The Company is insured for these costs and filed an insurance claim with its insurance provider. As of August 31, 2015, the Company's receivable related to this insurance claim was approximately $2.6 million. The Company’s insurance policy also addresses coverage for business interruption. During the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2015, the Company filed a claim with its insurance carrier for approximately $332,000 related to business interruption for which the Company did not record a receivable.

﻿

The Company received the final insurance settlement payments of approximately $3.1 million during the quarter ended November 30, 2015. As a result, the Company recorded a credit to cost of goods sold of approximately $165,000 during the period that reflects the reversal of the inventory written off previously and now covered under the claim and gain on the disposal of assets for $85,000 that included reimbursement from the insurance for assets disposed of in fiscal year 2015. Additionally, the Company recorded during the quarter ended November 30, 2015 other income from insurance proceeds of approximately $202,000 during the period that reflects the amount reimbursed to the Company for business interruption coverage, net of taxes and other miscellaneous amounts charged to the Company by the insurance company for storage of the damaged inventory.

Foreign Currency Translation – The assets and liabilities of the Company’s foreign operations are translated to U.S. dollars when the functional currency in the Company’s international subsidiaries is the local currency and not U.S. dollars. Assets and liabilities of these foreign subsidiaries are translated to U.S. dollars at the exchange rate on the balance sheet date, and revenue, costs and expenses are translated at average rates of exchange in effect during the period. The corresponding translation gains and losses are recorded as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income or loss. These adjustments will affect net income upon the sale or liquidation of the underlying investment. Monetary assets and liabilities denominated in currencies other than the functional currency of the respective entity (primarily U.S. dollars) are revalued to the functional currency using the exchange rate on the balance sheet date. These foreign exchange transaction gains (losses), including transactions recorded involving these monetary assets and liabilities, are recorded as Other income (expense) in the consolidated statements of income.

﻿

12

Table of Contents

PRICESMART, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

The following table summarizes the amounts recorded for the three and six months ended February 28, 2017 and February 29, 2016 (in thousands):

﻿

﻿

﻿ |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
﻿ |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
﻿ |  | Three Months Ended |  | Six Months Ended
﻿ |  | February 28, |  | February 29, |  | February 28, |  | February 29,
﻿ |  | 2017 |  | 2016 |  | 2017 |  | 2016
Currency gain (loss) |  | $ | 915 |  | $ | (552) |  | $ | (13) |  | $ | (796)

﻿

Recent Accounting Pronouncements – Not Yet Adopted

﻿

FASB ASC 230 ASU 2016-18- Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230)—Restricted Cash

﻿

In November 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-18, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230)—Restricted Cash. This ASU addresses the diversity in practice that exists regarding the classification and the presentation of changes in restricted cash on the statement of cash flows.

﻿

The amendments in ASU No. 2016-18 require that a statement of cash flows explain the change during the period in the total of cash, cash equivalents and amounts generally described as restricted cash or restricted cash equivalents. Thus, amounts generally described as restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents should be included with cash and cash equivalents when reconciling the beginning-of-period and the end-of-period total amounts set forth on the statement of cash flows. The amendments in this ASU are effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017 and interim periods within those fiscal years and will be applied using a retrospective transition method to each period presented. The adoption of this ASU will impact the presentation of cash flows with inclusion of restricted cash flows for each of the presented periods.

﻿

FASB ASC 740 ASU 2016-16- Income Taxes (Topic 740)—Intra-Entity Transfers of Assets Other Than Inventory

﻿

In October 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-16, Income Taxes (Topic 740)—Intra-Entity Transfers of Assets Other Than Inventory. Currently, U.S. GAAP prohibits recognizing current and deferred income tax consequences for an intra-entity asset transfer until the asset has been sold to an outside party. ASU 2016-16 states that an entity should recognize the income tax consequences of an intra-entity transfer of an asset other than inventory when the transfer occurs.

﻿

The amendments in this ASU are effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017 and interim periods within those annual periods. Early adoption is permitted. The amendments should be applied on a modified retrospective basis through a cumulative-effect adjustment directly to retained earnings as of the beginning of the period of adoption. The Company will evaluate the impact adoption of this guidance may have on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

﻿

FASB ASC 230 ASU 2016-15- Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230)—Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments (a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force)

﻿

In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-15, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments. This ASU addresses stakeholders’ concerns regarding diversity in practice in how certain cash receipts and cash payments are presented and classified in the statement of cash flows under Topic 230, Statement of Cash Flows, and other Topics. In particular, ASU No. 2016-15 addresses eight specific cash flow issues in an effort to reduce this diversity in practice: (1) debt prepayment or debt extinguishment costs; (2) settlement of zero-coupon bonds; (3) contingent consideration payments made after a business combination; (4) proceeds from the settlement of insurance claims; (5) proceeds from the settlement of corporate-owned life insurance policies, including bank-owned life insurance policies; (6) distributions received from equity method investees; (7) beneficial interests in securitization transactions; and (8) separately identifiable cash flows and application of the predominance principle.

﻿

The amendments in this ASU are effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017 and interim periods within those annual periods. Early adoption is permitted. The amendments in this ASU should be applied using a retrospective transition method to each period presented. If it is impracticable to apply the amendments retrospectively for some of the issues, the amendments for those issues would be applied prospectively as of the earliest date practicable. The Company will evaluate the impact adoption of this guidance may have on the Company's consolidated financial statements.

13

Table of Contents

PRICESMART, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

﻿

﻿

FASB ASC 718 ASU 2016-09 - Compensation—Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting

﻿

In March 2016, the FASB issued amendments to the guidance on employee share-based payment accounting intended to improve the accounting for employee share-based payments. This ASU simplifies several aspects of the accounting for share-based payment award transactions, including:

﻿

| · |  | The income tax consequences,

| · |  | Classification of awards as either equity or liabilities, and

| · |  | Classification on the statement of cash flows

﻿

The amendments in this ASU are effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016 and interim periods within those annual periods. Early adoption is permitted in any interim or annual period.

﻿

Amendments related to the timing of when excess tax benefits are recognized, minimum statutory withholding requirements, forfeitures, and intrinsic value should be applied using a modified retrospective transition method by means of a cumulative-effect adjustment to equity as of the beginning of the period in which the guidance is adopted. Amendments related to the presentation of employee taxes paid on the statement of cash flows when an employer withholds shares to meet the minimum statutory withholding requirement should be applied retrospectively. Amendments requiring recognition of excess tax benefits and tax deficiencies in the income statement and the practical expedient for estimating expected term should be applied prospectively. An entity may elect to apply the amendments related to the presentation of excess tax benefits on the statement of cash flows using either a prospective transition method or a retrospective transition method.

﻿

The Company plans to adopt this guidance at the beginning of its first quarter of fiscal year 2018. Adoption of this guidance will likely be material to the provision for income taxes on the Company’s consolidated income statements and earnings per share amounts for the change in the recognition of excess tax benefits or deficiencies. This may create increased volatility in the provision for income tax amounts reported during the interim periods and fiscal year 2018. Previously these amounts were reflected in equity. Additionally, cash paid by the employer when directly withholding shares for tax-withholding purposes will be classified as a financing activity and any excess tax benefits will be classified along with other income tax cash flows as an operating activity. Adoption of this guidance is not expected to have a material effect on the consolidated balance sheets, statements of cash flows or related disclosures.

﻿

FASB ASC 842 ASU 2016-02 -Leases (Topic 842): Amendments to the FASB Accounting Standards Codification

﻿

In February 2016, the FASB issued amendments to the guidance on lease accounting. Under the new guidance, for all leases longer than 12 months, a lessee will be required to record a lease liability for all payments arising from a lease and also record a right of use asset for the term of the lease. Under the new guidance lessor accounting is largely unchanged.

﻿

The amendment in this ASU is effective on a prospective or modified retrospective basis for public entities for fiscal years and interim periods within those annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018. Early adoption is permitted. In transition, lessees and lessors are required to recognize and measure leases at the beginning of the earliest period presented using a modified retrospective approach. The modified retrospective approach includes a number of optional practical expedients that entities may elect to apply. These practical expedients relate to the identification and classification of leases that commenced before the effective date, initial direct costs for leases that commenced before the effective date, and the ability to use hindsight in evaluating lessee options to extend or terminate a lease or to purchase the underlying asset. An entity that elects to apply the practical expedients will, in effect, continue to account for leases that commence before the effective date in accordance with previous GAAP unless the lease is modified, except that lessees are required to recognize a right-of-use asset and a lease liability for all operating leases at each reporting date based on the present value of the remaining minimum rental payments that were tracked and disclosed under previous GAAP.

﻿

The Company plans to adopt this guidance at the beginning of its first quarter of fiscal year 2020. While the Company continues to evaluate this standard and the effect on related disclosures, the primary effect of adoption will be to record right-of-use assets and corresponding lease obligations for current operating leases. The adoption is expected to have a material impact on the Company's consolidated balance sheets, but not on results of operations or cash flows.

﻿

14

Table of Contents

PRICESMART, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

FASB ASC 330 ASU 2015-11 -Inventory (Topic 330): Simplifying the Measurement of Inventory

﻿

In July 2015, the FASB issued guidance that will require an entity to measure in-scope inventory at the lower of cost and net realizable value. Net realizable value is the estimated selling prices in the ordinary course of business, less reasonably predictable costs of completion, disposal, and transportation. This amendment applies to entities, like the Company, that measure inventory value using the average cost method. The amendments in this ASU more closely align the measurement of inventory in GAAP with the measurement of inventory in International Financial Reporting Standards.

﻿

The amendment in this ASU is effective on a prospective basis for public entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early application is permitted as of the beginning of an interim or annual reporting period. The Company will evaluate the impact adoption of this guidance may have on the Company's consolidated financial statements.

﻿

FASB ASC 606 ASU 2014-09 - Revenue from Contracts with Customers

﻿

In May 2014, the FASB issued amended guidance on contracts with customers to transfer goods or services or contracts for the transfer of nonfinancial assets, unless those contracts are within the scope of other standards (e.g., insurance contracts or lease contracts). The guidance requires an entity to recognize revenue on contracts with customers relating to the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. The guidance requires that an entity depict the consideration by applying the following steps:

﻿

Step 1: Identify the contract(s) with a customer.
Step 2: Identify the performance obligations in the contract.
Step 3: Determine the transaction price.
Step 4: Allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract.
Step 5: Recognize revenue when (or as) the entity satisfies a performance obligation.

﻿

The amendments in this ASU were deferred by ASU 2015-14 for all entities by one year and is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within that reporting period. Earlier application is permitted only as of annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim reporting periods within that reporting period. This amendment is to be either retrospectively adopted to each prior reporting period presented or retrospectively with the cumulative effect of initially applying this ASU recognized at the date of initial application. The Company plans to adopt this guidance at the beginning of its first quarter of fiscal year 2019 and is in the process of evaluating the impact and method of adoption of the standard and its related amendments. The Company is reviewing current accounting policies, business processes, systems and controls to identify potential differences or changes that would result from applying the new standard. The Company is still evaluating whether or not there will be a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements and related disclosures as a result of adopting this standard.

﻿

Recent Accounting Pronouncements Adopted

﻿

FASB ASC 740 ASU 2015-17 -Income Taxes (Topic 740): Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes

﻿

In November 2015, the FASB issued amended guidance eliminating the requirement for organizations to present deferred tax liabilities and assets as current and noncurrent in a classified balance sheet. Instead, organizations will be required to classify all deferred tax assets and liabilities as noncurrent.

﻿

The amendment in this ASU is effective on a prospective or retrospective basis for public entities for fiscal years and interim periods within those annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016. Early adoption is allowed. The Company retrospectively adopted this amend ed guidance during the second quarter of fiscal year 2016 and now presents all deferred taxes as either long-term assets or long-term liabilities. The Company disclosed within its Annual Report on Form 10-K filed for fiscal year 2016 and within the Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q for the quarterly periods for fiscal year 2016 the financial impact to the Consolidated Balance Sheet.

﻿

FASB ASC 350 ASU 2015-05 - Customers Accounting for Fees Paid in a Cloud Computing Arrangement

﻿

In April 2015, the FASB issued amended guidance about whether a cloud computing arrangement includes a software license. If a cloud computing arrangement includes a software license, then the customer should account for the software license element of the arrangement consistent with the acquisition of other software licenses. If a cloud computing arrangement does

15

Table of Contents

PRICESMART, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

not include a software license, the customer should account for the arrangement as a service contract. The amendments do not change the accounting for a customer’s accounting for service contracts.

﻿

The amendments in this ASU are effective for public entities for annual periods, including interim periods within those annual periods, beginning after December 15, 2015. Early adoption was permitted. An entity was able to adopt the amendments either: (1) prospectively to all arrangements entered into or materially modified after the effective date; or (2) retrospectively. The Company adopted this amended guidance as of September 1, 2016. Adoption of this guidance did not generate a change in accounting principle, changes in financial statement line items, or the requirement to prospectively or retrospectively adopt a method of transition.

﻿

﻿

﻿

NOTE 3 – EARNINGS PER SHARE

﻿

The Company presents basic net income per share using the two-class method. The two-class method is an earnings allocation formula that treats a participating security as having rights to earnings that otherwise would have been available to common stockholders and that determines basic net income per share for each class of common stock and participating security according to dividends declared (or accumulated) and participation rights in undistributed earnings that would have been available to common stockholders. A participating security is defined as a security that may participate in undistributed earnings with common stock. The Company’s capital structure includes securities that participate with common stock on a one-for-one basis for distribution of dividends. These are the restricted stock awards and restricted stock units authorized within the 2013 Equity Incentive Award Plan. The Company determines the diluted net income per share by using the more dilutive of the two class-method or the treasury stock method and by including the basic weighted average of outstanding stock options in the calculation of diluted net income per share under the two-class method and including all potential common shares assumed issued in the calculation of diluted net income per share under the treasury stock method.

﻿

The following table sets forth the computation of net income per share for the three and six months ended February 28, 2017 and February 29, 2016 (in thousands, except per share amounts):

﻿

﻿

﻿ |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
﻿ |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
﻿ |  | Three Months Ended |  | Six Months Ended
﻿ |  | February 28, |  | February 29, |  | February 28, |  | February 29,
﻿ |  | 2017 |  | 2016 |  | 2017 |  | 2016
Net income |  | $ | 27,219 |  | $ | 25,942 |  | $ | 52,088 |  | $ | 49,614
Less: Allocation of income to unvested stockholders |  |  | (345) |  |  | (371) |  |  | (758) |  |  | (742)
Net earnings available to common stockholders |  | $ | 26,874 |  | $ | 25,571 |  | $ | 51,330 |  | $ | 48,872
Basic weighted average shares outstanding |  |  | 30,004 |  |  | 29,914 |  |  | 29,993 |  |  | 29,902
Add dilutive effect of stock options (two-class method) |  |  | 4 |  |  | 5 |  |  | 4 |  |  | 5
Diluted average shares outstanding |  |  | 30,008 |  |  | 29,919 |  |  | 29,997 |  |  | 29,907
Basic net income per share |  | $ | 0.90 |  | $ | 0.85 |  | $ | 1.72 |  | $ | 1.63
Diluted net income per share |  | $ | 0.90 |  | $ | 0.85 |  | $ | 1.72 |  | $ | 1.63

NOTE 4 – STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

﻿

Dividends

﻿

The following table summarizes the dividends declared and paid during fiscal years 2017 and 2016 (amounts are per share).

﻿

﻿

﻿ |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
﻿ |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
﻿ |  |  |  |  | First Payment |  | Second Payment
Declared |  | Amount |  | Record Date |  | Date Paid |  | Date Payable |  | Amount |  | Record Date |  | Date Paid |  | Date Payable |  | Amount
2/1/2017 |  | $ | 0.70 |  | 2/15/2017 |  | 2/28/2017 |  | N/A |  | $ | 0.35 |  | 8/15/2017 |  | N/A |  | 8/31/2017 |  | $ | 0.35
2/3/2016 |  | $ | 0.70 |  | 2/15/2016 |  | 2/29/2016 |  | N/A |  | $ | 0.35 |  | 8/15/2016 |  | 8/31/2016 |  | N/A |  | $ | 0.35

﻿

The Company anticipates the ongoing payment of semi-annual dividends in subsequent periods, although the actual declaration of future dividends, the amount of such dividends, and the establishment of record and payment dates is subject to

16

Table of Contents

PRICESMART, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

final determination by the Board of Directors at its discretion after its review of the Company’s financial performance and anticipated capital requirements.

﻿

Com prehensive Income and Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss

﻿

The following tables disclose the effects of each component of other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax (in thousands):

﻿

﻿ |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
﻿ |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
﻿ |  | Six Months Ended February 28, 2017
﻿ |  | Foreign currency translation adjustments |  | Defined benefit pension plans |  | Derivative Instruments |  | Total
Beginning balance, September 1, 2016 |  | $ | (102,242) |  | $ | (315) |  | $ | (1,394) | (1) | $ | (103,951)
Other comprehensive income (loss) |  |  | (1,629) |  |  | — |  |  | 783 |  |  | (846)
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) |  |  | — |  |  | (14) | (2) |  | — |  |  | (14)
Ending balance, February 28, 2017 |  | $ | (103,871) |  | $ | (329) |  | $ | (611) |  | $ | (104,811)

﻿

﻿ |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
﻿ |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
﻿ |  | Six Months Ended February 29, 2016
﻿ |  | Foreign currency translation adjustments |  | Defined benefit pension plans |  | Derivative Instruments |  | Total
Beginning balance, September 1, 2015 |  | $ | (100,540) |  | $ | (113) |  | $ | (859) |  | $ | (101,512)
Other comprehensive income (loss) |  |  | (10,892) |  |  | — |  |  | (331) | (1) |  | (11,223)
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) |  |  | — |  |  | (8) | (2) |  | — |  |  | (8)
Ending balance, February 29, 2016 |  | $ | (111,432) |  | $ | (121) |  | $ | (1,190) |  | $ | (112,743)

﻿

﻿ |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
﻿ |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
﻿ |  | Twelve Months Ended August 31, 2016
﻿ |  | Foreign currency translation adjustments |  | Defined benefit pension plans |  | Derivative Instruments |  | Total
Beginning balance, September 1, 2015 |  | $ | (100,540) |  | $ | (113) |  | $ | (859) |  | $ | (101,512)
Other comprehensive income (loss) |  |  | (1,702) |  |  | (182) |  |  | (535) | (1) |  | (2,419)
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) |  |  | — |  |  | (20) | (2) |  | — |  |  | (20)
Ending balance, August 31, 2016 |  | $ | (102,242) |  | $ | (315) |  | $ | (1,394) |  | $ | (103,951)

﻿

| (1) |  | See Note 7 - Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities.

| (2) |  | Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) related to the minimum pension liability are included in warehouse club operations in the Company's Consolidated Statements of Income.

Retained Earnings Not Available for Distribution

﻿

The following table summarizes retained earnings designated as legal reserves of various subsidiaries which cannot be distributed as dividends to PriceSmart, Inc. according to applicable statutory regulations (in thousands):

﻿

﻿

﻿ |  |  |  |  |  |
﻿ |  |  |  |  |  |
﻿ |  | February 28, |  | August 31,
﻿ |  | 2017 |  | 2016
Retained earnings not available for distribution |  | $ | 6,213 |  | $ | 5,926

17

Table of Contents

PRICESMART, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

NOTE 5 – COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

﻿

Legal Proceedings

﻿

From time to time, the Company and its subsidiaries are subject to legal proceedings, claims and litigation arising in the ordinary course of business related to the Company’s operations and property ownership. The Company evaluates such matters on a case by case basis, and vigorously contests any such legal proceedings or claims which the Company believes are without merit. The Company establishes an accrual for legal proceedings if and when those matters reach a stage where they present loss contingencies that are both probable and reasonably estimable. In such cases, there may be a possible exposure to loss in excess of any amounts accrued. The Company monitors those matters for developments that would affect the likelihood of a loss and the accrued amount, if any, thereof, and adjusts the amount as appropriate. If the loss contingency at issue is not both probable and reasonably estimable, the Company does not establish an accrual, but will continue to monitor the matter for developments that will make the loss contingency both probable and reasonably estimable. If it is at least a reasonable possibility that a material loss will occur, the Company will provide disclosure regarding the contingency. The Company believes that the final disposition of the pending legal proceedings, claims and litigation will not have a material adverse effect on its financial position, results of operations or liquidity. It is possible, however, that the Company's future results of operations for a particular quarter or fiscal year could be impacted by changes in circumstances relating to such matters.

﻿

Taxes

﻿

Income Taxes – The Company accounts for income taxes using the asset and liability method. Under the asset and liability method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributed to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences and carry-forwards are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. A valuation allowance is established when necessary to reduce deferred tax assets to amounts expected to be realized.

﻿

The Company is required to file federal and state tax returns in the United States and various other tax returns in foreign jurisdictions. The preparation of these tax returns requires the Company to interpret the applicable tax laws and regulations in effect in such jurisdictions, which could affect the amount of tax paid by the Company. The Company, in consultation with its tax advisors, bases its tax returns on interpretations that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. The tax returns, however, are subject to routine reviews by the various taxing authorities in the jurisdictions in which the Company files its returns. As part of these reviews, a taxing authority may disagree with respect to the interpretations the Company used to calculate its tax liability and therefore require the Company to pay additional taxes.

﻿

The Company accrues an amount for its estimate of probable additional income tax liability. In certain cases, the impact of an uncertain income tax position on the income tax return must be recognized at the largest amount that is more likely than not to be sustained upon audit by the relevant tax authority. An uncertain income tax position will not be recognized if it has less than 50% likelihood of being sustained. This requires significant judgment, the use of estimates, and the interpretation and application of complex tax laws. When facts and circumstances change, the Company reassesses these probabilities and records any changes in the consolidated financial statements as appropriate. There were no material changes in the Company's uncertain income tax positions as of February 28, 2017 and August 31, 2016.

﻿

In evaluating the exposure associated with various non-income tax filing positions, the Company accrues for probable and estimable exposures for non-income tax related tax contingencies. As of February 28, 2017 and August 31, 2016, the Company has recorded within other accrued expenses a total of $3.9 million and $4.0 million, respectively, for various non-income tax related tax contingencies.

﻿

While the Company believes the recorded liabilities are adequate, there are inherent limitations in projecting the outcome of litigation, in estimating probable additional income tax liability taking into account uncertain tax positions and in evaluating the probable additional tax associated with various non-income tax filing positions. As such, the Company is unable to make a reasonable estimate of the sensitivity to change of estimates affecting its recorded liabilities. As additional information becomes available, the Company assesses the potential liability and revises its estimates as appropriate.

﻿

During the first quarter of fiscal year 2015, the Company received provisional tax assessments with respect to deductibility and withholdings. One of the Company’s subsidiaries received provisional assessments claiming $2.5 million of taxes, penalties and interest related to withholding taxes on certain charges for services rendered by the Company. In addition, this subsidiary received provisional assessments totaling $5.1 million for lack of deductibility of the underlying service charges due to the lack of withholding. Based on a review of the Company's tax advisers' interpretation of local law, rulings and

18

Table of Contents

PRICESMART, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

jurisprudence (including Supreme Court precedents with respect to the deductibility assessment), the Company expects to prevail in both instances and has not recorded a provision for these assessments. Also, in another country where the Company operates, beginning in fiscal year 2015, a new minimum income tax mechanism took effect, which requires the Company to pay taxes based on a percentage of sales rather than income. As a result, the Company is making income tax payments substantially in excess of those it would expect to pay based on taxable income. The current rules (which the Company has appealed) do not clearly allow the Company to obtain a refund or offset this excess income tax against other taxes. As of February 28, 2017, the Company had deferred tax assets of approximately $2.0 million in this country. Also, the Company had an income tax receivable balance of $3.5 million as of February 28, 2017 related to excess payments from fiscal years 2015, 2016 and 2017. The Company has not placed any type of allowance on the recoverability of these tax receivables or deferred income taxes, because the Company believes that it is more likely than not that it will succeed in its appeal on this matter.

﻿

The Company has not provided for U.S. deferred taxes on cumulative non-U.S. undistributed earnings as such earnings are deemed by the Company to be indefinitely reinvested. It is not practicable to determine the U.S. federal income tax liability that would be associated with such earnings because of the complexity of the computation.

﻿

﻿

Other Commitments

﻿

The Company is committed under non-cancelable operating leases for the rental of facilities and land. Future minimum lease commitments for facilities under these leases with an initial term in excess of one year are as follows (in thousands):

﻿

﻿

﻿ |  |  |  |
﻿ |  |  |  |
﻿ |  | Open |
Years ended February 28, |  | Locations(1) |
2018 |  | $ | 11,570 |
2019 |  |  | 11,124 |
2020(3) |  |  | 10,559 |
2021 |  |  | 9,481 |
2022 |  |  | 8,082 |
Thereafter |  |  | 91,164 |
Total |  | $ | 141,980 | (2)

﻿

| (1) |  | Operating lease obligations have been reduced by approximately $316,678 to reflect sub-lease income. Certain obligations under leasing arrangements are collateralized by the underlying asset being leased.

| (2) |  | As of August 31, 2016, total future minimum lease commitments were $120.9 million. The increase during the period ending February 28, 2017 is primarily related to the extension of an existing lease within the Company’s Guatemala subsidiary for its Pradera location. The subsidiary signed an extension on November 25, 2016, extending the lease termination date from May 31, 2021 to November 30, 2043. The lease extension included the real property at this location currently used by the Company and added additional square footage in the same shopping center to the lease. This has effectively provided the Company with possession of substantially all of the real property available at that location. The Company plans to expand and upgrade the current warehouse club and parking areas and to improve access into and out from the location.

| (3) |  | The year 2020 is a leap year with the period ending February 29 th.

﻿

The Company is also committed to non-cancelable construction service obligations for various warehouse club developments and expansions. As of February 28, 2017 and August 31, 2016, these commitments were approximately $8.2 million and $1.5 million, respectively, for construction services not yet rendered.

﻿

The Company has entered into land purchase option agreements that have not been recorded as commitments, for which the Company has recorded deposits of approximately $785,000. The land purchase option agreements can generally be canceled at the sole option of the Company, with the deposits being fully refundable up and until all permits are issued. However, the deposit on one piece of land totaling approximately $50,000 would be forfeited if pending permit s are not received and the Company were to decide not to proceed with the acquisition. The Company does not have a timetable for when or if it will exercise these land purchase options, due to the uncertainty related to the completion of the Company's due diligence review. The Company's due diligence review includes evaluations of the legal status of the property, the zoning and permitting issues related to acquiring approval for the construction and operation of a warehouse club and any other issues related to the property itself that could render the property unsuitable or limit the property's economic viability as a warehouse club site. If the purchase option agreements are exercised, the cash use for purchase of land would be approximately $24.5 million. The Company may enter into additional land purchase option agreements in the future.

﻿

19

Table of Contents

PRICESMART, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

The table below summarizes the Company’s interest in real estate joint ventures, commitments to additional future investments and the Company’s maximum exposure to loss as a result of its involvement in these joint venture as of February 28, 2017 (in thousands):

﻿

﻿ |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
﻿ |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Entity |  | % Ownership |  | Initial Investment |  | Additional Investments |  | Net (Loss)/Income Inception to Date |  | Company’s Variable Interest in Entity |  | Commitment to Future Additional Investments(1) |  | Company's Maximum Exposure to Loss in Entity(2)
GolfPark Plaza, S.A. |  | 50 | % |  | $ | 4,616 |  | $ | 2,402 |  | $ | 296 |  | $ | 7,314 |  | $ | 99 |  | $ | 7,413
Price Plaza Alajuela, S.A. |  | 50 | % |  |  | 2,193 |  |  | 1,236 |  |  | 16 |  |  | 3,445 |  |  | 785 |  |  | 4,230
Total |  |  |  |  | $ | 6,809 |  | $ | 3,638 |  | $ | 312 |  | $ | 10,759 |  | $ | 884 |  | $ | 11,643

﻿

| (1) |  | The parties intend to seek alternate financing for the project, which could reduce the amount of investments each party would be required to provide. The parties may mutually agree on changes to the project, which could increase or decrease the amount of contributions each party is required to provide.

| (2) |  | The maximum exposure is determined by adding the Company’s variable interest in the entity and any explicit or implicit arrangements that could require the Company to provide additional financial support.

﻿

The Company contracts for distribution center services in Mexico. The contract for this distribution center's services expires on August 31, 2017, with the applicable fees and rates to be reviewed at the beginning of each calendar year. Future minimum service commitments related to this contract through the end of the contract term are approximately $82,000.

﻿

The Company contracts for off-site data recovery services as part of its disaster recovery plan. The contract for these data recovery services expires on November 30, 2019. Future minimum service commitments related to this contract are approximately $372,000 for each of the 12-month periods ending February 28, 2018 and 2019 and approximately $279,000 for the 12-month period ending February 28, 2020.

NOTE 6 – DEBT

﻿

Short-term borrowings consist of lines of credit that are secured by certain assets of the Company and its subsidiaries, which, in some cases, are guaranteed by the Company. The following table summarizes the balances of total facilities, facilities used and facilities available (in thousands):

﻿

﻿

﻿ |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
﻿ |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
﻿ |  |  |  |  | Facilities Used |  |  |  |  |  |
﻿ |  | Total Amount |  | Short-term |  | Letters of |  | Facilities |  | Weighted average |
﻿ |  | of Facilities |  | Borrowings |  | Credit |  | Available |  | interest rate |
February 28, 2017 |  | $ | 69,000 |  | $ | 6,561 |  | $ | — |  | $ | 62,439 |  | 10.1 | %
August 31, 2016 |  | $ | 65,000 |  | $ | 16,534 |  | $ | 9,224 |  | $ | 39,242 |  | 10.1 | %

﻿

As of February 28, 2017 and August 31, 2016, the Company had approximately $40.0 million of short-term facilities in the U.S. that require compliance with certain quarterly financial covenants. As of February 28, 2017 and August 31, 2016, the Company was in compliance with respect to these covenants. E ach of the facilities expires annually and is normally renewed.

﻿

20

Table of Contents

PRICESMART, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

﻿

The following table provides the changes in long-term debt for the six months ended February 28, 2017:

﻿

﻿

﻿ |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
﻿ |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
(Amounts in thousands) |  | Current portion of long-term debt |  | Long-term debt (net of current portion) |  | Total |
Balances as of August 31, 2016 |  | $ | 14,565 |  | $ | 73,542 |  | $ | 88,107 | (1)
Proceeds from long-term debt incurred during the period: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
MFUG Union Bank |  |  | — |  |  | 35,700 |  |  | 35,700 |
Repayments of long-term debt: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Regularly scheduled loan payments |  |  | — |  |  | (7,231) |  |  | (7,231) |
Translation adjustments on foreign-currency debt of subsidiaries whose functional currency is not the U.S. dollar (2) |  |  | 58 |  |  | (69) |  |  | (11) |
Balances as of February 28, 2017 |  | $ | 14,623 |  | $ | 101,942 |  | $ | 116,565 | (3)

﻿

| (1) |  | The carrying amount o f non-cash assets assigned as collateral for th ese loans was $102.4 million. No cash assets were assigned as collateral for th ese loans.

| (2) |  | These foreign currency translation adjustments are recorded within Other comprehensive income.

| (3) |  | The carrying amount o f non-cash assets assigned as collateral for th ese loans was $141.8 million. No cash assets were assigned as collateral for th ese loans.

﻿

In January 2017, the Company finalized its acquisition of a distribution center in Medley, Miami-Dade County, Florida, for a total purchase price of approximately $46.0 million. The Company will transfer the majority of its Miami distribution center activities located in the previously leased facilities. This should be completed by the end of the third quarter of fiscal year 2017. To finance the acquisition of this prop erty, the Company entered into a 10-year real estate secured loan with MUFG Union Bank, N.A. (“Union Bank”) of $35.7 million in January 2017. This loan has a variable interest rate of 30-day LIBOR plus 1.7%, with monthly principal and interest payments maturing in 2027. The Company also entered into an interest rate hedge with Union Bank for $35.7 million, the notional amount. Under the hedge, the Company will receive variable 30-day LIBOR plus 1.7% and pay fixed (3.6 5%), with an effective date of March 1, 2017 and maturity date of March 1, 2027. The Company intends to terminate portions of the existing leased Miami distribution facilities or enter into sublease agreements for portions of the leased facility. The Company will record costs related to the termination of the leased facility as liabilities, with the related expenses as warehouse expenses, once the leased facility is available for subleasing.

As of February 28, 2017, the Company had approximately $105.3 million of long-term loans in the U.S., Trinidad, Panama, El Salvador, Honduras, Costa Rica, Barbados and Colombia that require these subsidiaries to comply with certain annual or quarterly financial covenants, which include debt service and leverage ratios. As of February 28, 2017, the Company was in compliance with all covenants or amended covenants.

﻿

As of August 31, 2016, the Company had approximately $76.0 million of long-term loans in Trinidad, Panama, El Salvador, Honduras, Costa Rica, Barbados, and Colombia that require these subsidiaries to comply with certain annual or quarterly financial covenants, which include debt service and leverage ratios. As of August 31, 2016, the Company was in compliance with all covenants or amended covenants.

﻿

21

Table of Contents

PRICESMART, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

Annual maturities of long-term debt are as follows (in thousands):

﻿

﻿

﻿ |  |  |
﻿ |  |  |
Twelve Months Ended February 28, |  | Amount
2018 |  | $ | 14,165
2019 |  |  | 13,760
2020 (1) |  |  | 29,364
2021 |  |  | 19,354
2022 |  |  | 3,405
Thereafter |  |  | 33,322
Total (2) |  | $ | 113,370

﻿

| (1) |  | The year 2020 is a leap year with the period ending February 29th.

| (2) |  | In the case of loans subject to cross-currency interest rate swaps, the Company has used the effective rate to the Company under the applicable derivative obligation as of February 28, 2017 to disclose the future commitments of the related long-term debt.

NOTE 7 – DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS AND HEDGING ACTIVITIES

﻿

The Company is exposed to interest rate risk relating to its ongoing business operations. To manage interest rate exposure, the Company enters into hedge transactions (interest rate swaps) using derivative financial instruments. The objective of entering into interest rate swaps is to eliminate the variability of cash flows in the LIBOR interest payments associated with variable-rate loans over the life of the loans. As changes in interest rates impact the future cash flow of interest payments, the hedges provide a synthetic offset to interest rate movements.

﻿

In addition, the Company is exposed to foreign currency and interest rate cash flow exposure related to non-functional currency long-term debt of three of its wholly owned subsidiaries. To manage this foreign currency and interest rate cash flow exposure, the Company’s subsidiaries entered into cross-currency interest rate swaps that convert their U.S. dollar denominated floating interest payments to functional currency fixed interest payments during the life of the hedging instrument. As changes in foreign exchange and interest rates impact the future cash flow of interest payments, the hedges are intended to offset changes in cash flows attributable to interest rate and foreign exchange movements.

﻿

These derivative instruments (cash flow hedging instruments) are designated and qualify as cash flow hedges, with the effective portion of the gain or loss on the derivative reported as a component of other comprehensive income (loss) and reclassified into earnings in the same period or periods during which the hedged transaction is determined to be ineffective. There were no such amounts recorded for ineffectiveness for the periods reported herein related to the interest rate or cross-currency interest rate swaps of long-term debt.

﻿

The Company is exposed to foreign-currency exchange-rate fluctuations in the normal course of business, including foreign-currency exchange-rate fluctuations on U.S. dollar denominated liabilities within its international subsidiaries whose functional currency is other than the U.S. dollar. The Company manages these fluctuations, in part, through the use of non-deliverable forward foreign-exchange contracts that are intended to offset changes in cash flow attributable to currency exchange movements. These contracts are intended primarily to economically address exposure to U.S. dollar merchandise inventory expenditures made by the Company’s international subsidiaries whose functional currency is other than the U.S. dollar. Currently, these contracts do not qualify for derivative hedge accounting. The Company seeks to mitigate foreign-currency exchange-rate risk with the use of these contracts and does not intend to engage in speculative transactions. These contracts do not contain any credit-risk-related contingent features.

﻿

Cash Flow Hedges

﻿

As of February 28, 2017, all of the Company’s interest rate swap and cross-currency interest rate swap derivative financial instruments are designated and qualify as cash flow hedges. The Company formally documents the hedging relationships for its derivative instruments that qualify for hedge accounting.

﻿

22

Table of Contents

PRICESMART, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

The following table summarizes agreements for which the Company has recorded cash flow hedge accounting for the six months ended February 28, 2017:

﻿

﻿

﻿ |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
﻿ |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Subsidiary |  | Date Entered into |  | Derivative Financial Counter- party |  | Derivative Financial Instruments |  | Initial US$ Notional Amount |  | Bank US$ loan Held with |  | Floating Leg (swap counter-party) |  | Fixed Rate for PSMT Subsidiary |  | Settlement Dates |  | Effective Period of swap
PriceSmart, Inc (1) |  | 7-Nov-16 |  | MUFG Union Bank, N.A. ("Union Bank") |  | Interest rate swap |  | $ | 35,700,000 |  | Union Bank |  | Variable rate 1-month Libor plus 1.7% |  | 3.65 | % |  | 1st day of each month beginning on April 1, 2017 |  | March 1, 2017 - March 1, 2027
Costa Rica |  | 28-Aug-15 |  | Citibank, N.A. ("Citi") |  | Cross currency interest rate swap |  | $ | 7,500,000 |  | Citibank, N.A. |  | Variable rate 3-month Libor plus 2.50% |  | 7.65 | % |  | 28th day of August, November, February, and May beginning on November 30, 2015 |  | August 28, 2015 - August 28, 2020
Honduras |  | 24-Mar-15 |  | Citibank, N.A. ("Citi") |  | Cross currency interest rate swap |  | $ | 8,500,000 |  | Citibank, N.A. |  | Variable rate 3-month Libor plus 3.25% |  | 10.75 | % |  | 24th day of March, June, September, and December beginning on June 24, 2015 |  | March 24,2015 - March 20, 2020
El Salvador |  | 16-Dec-14 |  | Bank of Nova Scotia ("Scotiabank") |  | Interest rate swap |  | $ | 4,000,000 |  | Bank of Nova Scotia |  | Variable rate 30-day Libor plus 3.5% |  | 4.78 | % |  | 29th day of each month beginning on December 29, 2014 |  | December 1, 2014 - August 29, 2019
Colombia |  | 10-Dec-14 |  | Citibank, N.A. ("Citi") |  | Cross currency interest rate swap |  | $ | 15,000,000 |  | Citibank, N.A. |  | Variable rate 3-month Libor plus 2.8% |  | 8.25 | % |  | 4th day of March, June, Sept, Dec. beginning on March 4, 2015 |  | December 4, 2014 - December 3, 2019
Panama |  | 9-Dec-14 |  | Bank of Nova Scotia ("Scotiabank") |  | Interest rate swap |  | $ | 10,000,000 |  | Bank of Nova Scotia |  | Variable rate 30-day Libor plus 3.5% |  | 5.16 | % |  | 28th day of each month beginning December 29, 2014 |  | November 28, 2014 - November 29, 2019
Honduras |  | 23-Oct-14 |  | Citibank, N.A. ("Citi") |  | Cross currency interest rate swap |  | $ | 5,000,000 |  | Citibank, N.A. |  | Variable rate 3-month Libor plus 3.5% |  | 11.6 | % |  | 22nd day of January, April, July, and October beginning on January 22, 2015 |  | October 22, 2014 - October 22, 2017
Panama |  | 1-Aug-14 |  | Bank of Nova Scotia ("Scotiabank") |  | Interest rate swap |  | $ | 5,000,000 |  | Bank of Nova Scotia |  | Variable rate 30-day Libor plus 3.5% |  | 4.89 | % |  | 21st day of each month beginning on September 22, 2014 |  | August 21, 2014 - August 21, 2019
Panama |  | 22-May-14 |  | Bank of Nova Scotia ("Scotiabank") |  | Interest rate swap |  | $ | 19,800,000 |  | Bank of Nova Scotia |  | Variable rate 30-day Libor plus 3.5% |  | 4.98 | % |  | 4th day of each month beginning on June 4, 2014 |  | May 5, 2014 - April 4, 2019
Panama |  | 22-May-14 |  | Bank of Nova Scotia ("Scotiabank") |  | Interest rate swap |  | $ | 3,970,000 |  | Bank of Nova Scotia |  | Variable rate 30-day Libor plus 3.5% |  | 4.98 | % |  | 4th day of each month beginning on June 4, 2014 |  | May 5, 2014 - April 4, 2019

﻿

| (1) |  | The initial notional amount and fixed rate were modified effective January 2017.

﻿

For the three and six months ended February 28, 2017 and February 29, 2016, the Company included the gain or loss on the hedged items (that is, variable-rate borrowings) in the same line item—interest expense—as the offsetting gain or loss on the related interest rate swaps as follows (in thousands):

﻿

﻿

﻿ |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
﻿ |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Income Statement Classification |  | Interest expense on borrowings(1) |  | Cost of swaps (2) |  | Total
Interest expense for the three months ended February 28, 2017 |  | $ | 755 |  | $ | 358 |  | $ | 1,113
Interest expense for the three months ended February 29, 2016 |  | $ | 813 |  | $ | 471 |  | $ | 1,284
Interest expense for the six months ended February 28, 2017 |  | $ | 1,504 |  | $ | 782 |  | $ | 2,286
Interest expense for the six months ended February 29, 2016 |  | $ | 1,565 |  | $ | 1,018 |  | $ | 2,583

﻿

| (1) |  | This amount is representative of the interest expense recognized on the underlying hedged transactions.

| (2) |  | This amount is representative of the interest expense recognized on the cross-currency interest rate swaps designated as cash flow hedging instruments.

﻿

23

Table of Contents

PRICESMART, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

The total notional balance of the Company’s pay-fixed/receive-variable interest rate swaps and cross-currency interest rate swaps was as follows (in thousands):

﻿

﻿

﻿ |  |  |  |  |  |
﻿ |  |  |  |  |  |
﻿ |  | Notional Amount as of
﻿ |  | February 28, |  | August 31,
Floating Rate Payer (Swap Counterparty) |  | 2017 |  | 2016
Scotiabank |  | $ | 29,657 |  | $ | 30,188
Union Bank |  |  | 35,700 |  |  | —
Citibank N.A. |  |  | 28,138 |  |  | 32,258
Total |  | $ | 93,495 |  | $ | 62,446

﻿

Derivatives listed on the table below were designated as cash flow hedging instruments. The table summarizes the effect of the fair value of interest rate swap and cross-currency interest rate swap derivative instruments that qualify for derivative hedge accounting and its associated tax effect on accumulated other comprehensive (income)/loss (in thousands):

﻿

﻿

﻿ |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
﻿ |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
﻿ |  |  |  | February 28, 2017 |  | August 31, 2016
Derivatives designated as cash flow hedging instruments |  | Balance Sheet Location |  | Fair Value |  | Net Tax Effect |  | Net OCI |  | Fair Value |  | Net Tax Effect |  | Net OCI
Cross-currency interest rate swaps |  | Other non-current assets |  | $ | 2,719 |  |  | (987) |  |  | 1,732 |  | $ | 3,224 |  | $ | (1,248) |  | $ | 1,976
Interest rate swaps |  | Other non-current assets |  |  | 613 |  |  | (220) |  |  | 393 |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | —
Interest rate swaps |  | Other long-term liabilities |  |  | (69) |  |  | 19 |  |  | (50) |  |  | (448) |  |  | 115 |  |  | (333)
Cross-currency interest rate swaps |  | Other long-term liabilities |  |  | (596) |  |  | 179 |  |  | (417) |  |  | (1,066) |  |  | 320 |  |  | (746)
Net fair value of derivatives designated as hedging instruments |  |  |  | $ | 2,667 |  | $ | (1,009) |  | $ | 1,658 |  | $ | 1,710 |  | $ | (813) |  | $ | 897

﻿

﻿

﻿

﻿

Fair Value Instruments

﻿

The Company entered into non-deliverable forward foreign-exchange contracts during fiscal year 2016. These contracts are treated for accounting purposes as fair value contracts and do not qualify for derivative hedge accounting. The use of non-deliverable forward foreign-exchange contracts is intended to offset changes in cash flow attributable to currency exchange movements. These contracts are intended primarily to economically hedge exposure to U.S. dollar merchandise inventory expenditures made by the Company’s international subsidiaries whose functional currency is other than the U.S. dollar. The Company did not enter into any additional non-deliverable forward foreign exchange contracts during the six months ended February 28, 2017. The following table summarizes the non-deliverable forward foreign exchange contracts that are open as of February 28, 2017:

﻿

﻿

﻿ |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
﻿ |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Subsidiary |  | Dates entered into |  | Financial Derivative (Counterparty) |  | Derivative Financial Instrument |  | Notional Amount (in thousands) |  | Settlement Date |  | Effective Period of Forward
Costa Rica |  | 31-Aug-16 |  | Citibank, N.A. |  | Forward foreign exchange contracts |  | $ | 3,750 |  | August 30, 2017 |  | August 31, 2016- August 30, 2017

﻿

24

Table of Contents

PRICESMART, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

For the three and six months ended February 28, 2017 and February 29, 2016, the Company included in its consolidated statements of income the forward derivative gain or (loss) on the non-deliverable forward foreign-exchange contracts as follows (in thousands):

﻿

﻿

﻿ |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
﻿ |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
﻿ |  | Three Months Ended |  | Six Months Ended
﻿ |  | February 28, |  | February 29, |  | February 28, |  | February 29,
Income Statement Classification |  | 2017 |  | 2016 |  | 2017 |  | 2016
Other income (expense), net |  | $ | 64 |  | $ | (88) |  | $ | 283 |  | $ | (151)

﻿

The following table summarizes the fair value of foreign currency forward contracts that do not qualify for derivative hedge accounting (in thousands):

﻿

﻿

﻿ |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
﻿ |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
﻿ |  | February 28, 2017 |  | August 31, 2016 |
Non-deliverable forward foreign exchange contracts |  | Balance Sheet Location |  | Fair Value |  | Balance Sheet Location |  | Fair Value |
Foreign currency forward contracts |  | Other accrued expenses |  | $ | (87) |  | Other accrued expenses |  | $ | (110) |
Net fair value of non-deliverable forward foreign exchange contracts designated as hedging instruments that do not qualify for hedge accounting |  |  |  | $ | (87) |  |  |  | $ | (110) |

﻿

﻿

﻿

﻿

﻿

﻿

﻿

﻿

25

Table of Contents

PRICESMART, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

NOTE 8 – SEGMENTS

﻿

The Company and its subsidiaries are principally engaged in the international operation of membership shopping in 39 warehouse clubs located in 13 countries/territories that are located in Central America, the Caribbean and Colombia. In addition, the Company operates distribution centers and corporate offices in the United States. The Company has aggregated its warehouse clubs, distribution centers and corporate offices into reportable segments. The Company’s reportable segments are based on management’s organization of these locations into operating segments by general geographic location, used by management and the Company's chief operating decision maker in setting up management lines of responsibility, providing support services, and making operational decisions and assessments of financial performance. Segment amounts are presented after converting to U.S. dollars and consolidating eliminations. Certain revenues, operating costs and inter-company charges included in the United States segment are not allocated to the segments within this presentation, as it is impractical to do so, and they appear as reconciling items to reflect the amount eliminated on consolidation of intersegment transactions.

﻿

﻿

﻿

The following tables summarize by segment certain revenues, operating costs and balance sheet items (in thousands):

﻿

﻿

﻿ |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
﻿ |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
﻿ |  | United States Operations |  | Central American Operations |  | Caribbean Operations |  | Colombia Operations |  | Reconciling Items(1) |  | Total
Three Months Ended February 28, 2017 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Revenue from external customers |  | $ | 8,171 |  | $ | 473,994 |  | $ | 219,515 |  | $ | 91,616 |  | $ | — |  | $ | 793,296
Intersegment revenues |  |  | 270,369 |  |  | — |  |  | 1,175 |  |  | 12 |  |  | (271,556) |  |  | —
Depreciation and amortization |  |  | 1,475 |  |  | 5,140 |  |  | 2,531 |  |  | 2,299 |  |  | — |  |  | 11,445
Operating income |  |  | 841 |  |  | 38,371 |  |  | 13,958 |  |  | 1,142 |  |  | (14,910) |  |  | 39,402
Net income |  |  | 2,652 |  |  | 30,545 |  |  | 8,568 |  |  | 364 |  |  | (14,910) |  |  | 27,219
Capital expenditures, net |  |  | 49,792 |  |  | 15,461 |  |  | 2,101 |  |  | 1,045 |  |  | — |  |  | 68,399
﻿ |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Six Months Ended February 28, 2017 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Revenue from external customers |  | $ | 18,926 |  | $ | 912,228 |  | $ | 426,537 |  | $ | 175,177 |  | $ | — |  | $ | 1,532,868
Intersegment revenues |  |  | 588,031 |  |  | — |  |  | 2,873 |  |  | 22 |  |  | (590,926) |  |  | —
Depreciation and amortization |  |  | 3,049 |  |  | 10,004 |  |  | 4,989 |  |  | 4,520 |  |  | — |  |  | 22,562
Operating income |  |  | 7,088 |  |  | 72,708 |  |  | 26,484 |  |  | 2,260 |  |  | (30,759) |  |  | 77,781
Net income |  |  | 4,960 |  |  | 57,605 |  |  | 19,741 |  |  | 541 |  |  | (30,759) |  |  | 52,088
Capital expenditures, net |  |  | 52,129 |  |  | 26,217 |  |  | 6,539 |  |  | 1,518 |  |  | — |  |  | 86,403
Long-lived assets (other than deferred tax assets) |  |  | 68,872 |  |  | 288,855 |  |  | 109,353 |  |  | 134,833 |  |  | — |  |  | 601,913
Goodwill |  |  | — |  |  | 31,153 |  |  | 4,539 |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 35,692
Total assets |  |  | 126,494 |  |  | 538,628 |  |  | 300,983 |  |  | 190,847 |  |  | — |  |  | 1,156,952
﻿ |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Three Months Ended February 29, 2016 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Revenue from external customers |  | $ | 6,567 |  | $ | 474,924 |  | $ | 230,035 |  | $ | 66,405 |  | $ | — |  | $ | 777,931
Intersegment revenues |  |  | 245,041 |  |  | — |  |  | 1,326 |  |  | — |  |  | (246,367) |  |  | —
Depreciation and amortization |  |  | 1,031 |  |  | 4,570 |  |  | 2,441 |  |  | 1,487 |  |  | — |  |  | 9,529
Operating income/(loss) |  |  | 5,183 |  |  | 38,980 |  |  | 14,658 |  |  | (1,698) |  |  | (17,987) |  |  | 39,136
Net income/(loss) |  |  | 1,591 |  |  | 31,433 |  |  | 13,100 |  |  | (2,195) |  |  | (17,987) |  |  | 25,942
Capital expenditures, net |  |  | 2,418 |  |  | 4,497 |  |  | 1,768 |  |  | 5,721 |  |  | — |  |  | 14,404
﻿ |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Six Months Ended February 29, 2016 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Revenue from external customers |  | $ | 14,816 |  | $ | 898,484 |  | $ | 441,698 |  | $ | 134,864 |  | $ | — |  | $ | 1,489,862
Intersegment revenues |  |  | 559,662 |  |  | — |  |  | 2,764 |  |  | — |  |  | (562,426) |  |  | —
Depreciation and amortization |  |  | 1,961 |  |  | 8,811 |  |  | 4,849 |  |  | 3,111 |  |  | — |  |  | 18,732
Operating income |  |  | 10,662 |  |  | 72,689 |  |  | 28,248 |  |  | (2,032) |  |  | (33,136) |  |  | 76,431
Net income |  |  | 3,318 |  |  | 57,635 |  |  | 24,903 |  |  | (3,106) |  |  | (33,136) |  |  | 49,614
Capital expenditures, net |  |  | 3,327 |  |  | 15,678 |  |  | 5,750 |  |  | 8,996 |  |  | — |  |  | 33,751
Long-lived assets (other than deferred tax assets) |  |  | 16,776 |  |  | 265,262 |  |  | 107,945 |  |  | 104,860 |  |  | — |  |  | 494,843
Goodwill |  |  | — |  |  | 31,090 |  |  | 4,611 |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 35,701
Total assets |  |  | 72,661 |  |  | 505,567 |  |  | 280,293 |  |  | 150,322 |  |  | — |  |  | 1,008,843
﻿ |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
As of August 31, 2016 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Long-lived assets (other than deferred tax assets) |  | $ | 19,222 |  | $ | 271,039 |  | $ | 108,426 |  | $ | 137,599 |  | $ | — |  | $ | 536,286
Goodwill |  |  | — |  |  | 31,091 |  |  | 4,546 |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 35,637
Total assets |  |  | 100,744 |  |  | 515,478 |  |  | 287,088 |  |  | 193,425 |  |  | — |  |  | 1,096,735
﻿ |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |

﻿

| (1) |  | The reconciling items reflect the amount eliminated on consolidation of intersegment transactions.

26

Table of Contents

PRICESMART, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

NOTE 9 – SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

﻿

The Company has evaluated all events subsequent to the balance sheet date of February 28, 2017 through the date of issuance of these consolidated financial statements and has determined that, except as set forth below, there are no subsequent events that require disclosure.

﻿

Financing Transactions

﻿

On March 31, 2017, the Company's Trinidad subsidiary entered into a loan agreement with Citibank, N.A. The agreement provides for a US $12.0 million loan to be repaid in 8 quarterly principal payments plus interest. The interest rate is set at the 90 day LIBOR rate plus 3%. The loan was funded on March 31, 2017.

﻿

Non-deliverable forward foreign-exchange contracts

﻿

The Company's Colombia subsidiary has entered into forward exchange contracts for approximately $6.0 million with settlement dates of May and June 201 7.

﻿

﻿

﻿

﻿

﻿

27

Table of Contents

PRICESMART, INC.

﻿

ITE M 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

﻿

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements concerning PriceSmart Inc.'s ("PriceSmart," the "Company" or "we") anticipated future revenues and earnings, adequacy of future cash flows, proposed warehouse club openings, the Company's performance relative to competitors and related matters. These forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements containing the words “expect,” “believe,” “will,” “may,” “should,” “project,” “estimate,” “anticipated,” “scheduled,” and like expressions, and the negative thereof. These statements are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially, including the following risks: our financial performance is dependent on international operations, which exposes us to various risks; any failure by us to manage our widely dispersed operations could adversely affect our business; we face significant competition; future sales growth depends, in part, on our ability to successfully open new warehouse clubs and grow sales in our existing locations; we might not identify in a timely manner or effectively respond to changes in consumer preferences for merchandise, which could adversely affect our relationship with members, demand for our products and market share; although we have begun to offer limited online shopping to our members, our sales could be adversely affected if one or more major international online retailers were to enter our markets or if other competitors were to offer a superior online experience; our profitability is vulnerable to cost increases; we face difficulties in the shipment of and risks inherent in the importation of, merchandise to our warehouse clubs; we are exposed to weather and other natural disaster risks that might not be adequately compensated by insurance; general economic conditions could adversely impact our business in various respects; our failure to maintain our brand and reputation could adversely affect our results of operations; we are subject to risks associated with possible changes in our relationships with third parties with which we do business, as well as the performance of such third parties; we rely extensively on computer systems to process transactions, summarize results and manage our business, and failure to adequately maintain our systems and disruptions in our systems could harm our business and adversely affect our results of operations; we could be subject to additional tax liabilities or subject to reserves on the recoverability of tax receivables; a few of our stockholders own approximately 25.3% of our voting stock as of February 28, 2017, which may make it difficult to complete some corporate transactions without their support and may impede a change in control; failure to attract and retain qualified employees, increases in wage and benefit costs, changes in laws and other labor issues could materially adversely affect our financial performance; we face the possibility of operational interruptions related to union work stoppages; we are subject to volatility in foreign currency exchange rates and limits on our ability to convert foreign currencies into U.S. dollars; we face the risk of exposure to product liability claims, a product recall and adverse publicity; any failure to maintain the security of the information relating to our company, members, employees and vendors that we hold, whether as a result of cybersecurity attacks on our information systems, failure of internal controls, employee negligence or malfeasance or otherwise, could damage our reputation with members, employees, vendors and others, could disrupt our operations, could cause us to incur substantial additional costs and to become subject to litigation and could materially adversely affect our operating results; we are subject to payment related risks; changes in accounting standards and assumptions, projections, estimates and judgments by management related to complex accounting matters could significantly affect our financial condition and results of operations; we face compliance risks related to our international operations; if remediation costs or hazardous substance contamination levels at certain properties for which we maintain financial responsibility exceed management's current expectations, our financial condition and results of operations could be adversely impacted. The risks described above as well as the other risks detailed in the Company's U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) reports, including those set forth in Part II – Item 1A – “Risk Factors” i n the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K filed for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2016 filed on October 27, 2016 pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. These risks are not the only risks that the Company faces. The Company could also be affected by additional factors that apply to all companies operating globally and in the U.S., as well as other risks that are not presently known to the Company or that the Company currently considers to be immaterial. Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are made, and we do not undertake to update these statements, except as required by law.

﻿

The following discussion and analysis compares the results of operations for the three and six months ended February 28, 2017 and February 29, 2016 and should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes included therein.

﻿

28

Table of Contents

Our business consists primarily of operating international membership shopping warehouse clubs similar to, but smaller in size than, warehouse clubs in the United States. We operate in 13 countries/territories that are located in Latin America and the Caribbean. Our ownership in all operating subsidiaries as of February 28, 2017 is 100%, and they are presented on a consolidated basis. The number of warehouse clubs in operation as of February 28, 2017 for each country or territory are as follows:

﻿

﻿

﻿ |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
﻿ |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
﻿ |  | Number of |  | Number of |  | Anticipated Additional |  | Anticipated
﻿ |  | Warehouse Clubs |  | Warehouse Clubs |  | Warehouse |  | Warehouse
﻿ |  | in Operation as of |  | in Operation as of |  | Club Openings |  | Club Openings
Country/Territory |  | August 31, 2016 |  | February 28, 2017 |  | In Fiscal Year 2017 |  | In Fiscal Year 2018
Colombia |  |  | 6 |  |  | 7 |  |  | — |  |  | —
Costa Rica |  |  | 6 |  |  | 6 |  |  | — |  |  | 1
Panama |  |  | 5 |  |  | 5 |  |  | — |  |  | —
Trinidad |  |  | 4 |  |  | 4 |  |  | — |  |  | —
Dominican Republic |  |  | 3 |  |  | 3 |  |  | — |  |  | —
Guatemala |  |  | 3 |  |  | 3 |  |  | — |  |  | —
Honduras |  |  | 3 |  |  | 3 |  |  | — |  |  | —
El Salvador |  |  | 2 |  |  | 2 |  |  | — |  |  | —
Nicaragua |  |  | 2 |  |  | 2 |  |  | — |  |  | —
Aruba |  |  | 1 |  |  | 1 |  |  | — |  |  | —
Barbados |  |  | 1 |  |  | 1 |  |  | — |  |  | —
U.S. Virgin Islands |  |  | 1 |  |  | 1 |  |  | — |  |  | —
Jamaica |  |  | 1 |  |  | 1 |  |  | — |  |  | —
Totals |  |  | 38 |  |  | 39 |  |  | — |  |  | 1

﻿

We opened a new warehouse club in Chia, Colombia, in September 2016, fiscal year 2017, that we constructed on land we acquired in May 2015, bringing the total of warehouse clubs operating in Colombia to seven. We are not planning any more warehouse club openings for fiscal year 2017.

﻿

In April 2015, we acquired land in Managua, Nicaragua. We constructed and then opened a warehouse club on this site in November 2015. On December 4, 2015 we signed an option to acquire two properties and then swapped them for 59,353 square feet of land adjacent to our San Pedro Sula warehouse club in Honduras. We exercised this option and completed the swap during May 2016. We used the acquired land to expand the parking lot for the San Pedro Sula warehouse club. We completed the expansion in December 2016. On February 1, 2017, the Company acquired land in Santa Ana, Costa Rica upon which the Company plans to construct a new warehouse club. We currently plan to open this new warehouse club in the fall of 2017, fiscal year 2018. With the six warehouse clubs currently operating in Cost Rica, this new warehouse club will bring the number of PriceSmart warehouse clubs operating in Costa Rica to seven. We continue to explore other potential sites for future warehouse clubs in Central America, the Caribbean and Colombia.

﻿

Our warehouse clubs and local distribution centers are located in Latin America and the Caribbean, and our corporate headquarters, U.S. buying operations and regional distribution centers are located primarily in the United States. The Company’s operating segments are the United States, Central America, the Caribbean and Colombia.

General Market Factors

﻿

Our sales and profits vary from market to market depending on general economic factors, including Gross Domestic Product (“GDP”) growth; consumer spending patterns; foreign currency exchange rates; political policies and social conditions; local demographic characteristics (such as population growth); the number of years PriceSmart has operated in a particular market; and the level of retail and wholesale competition in that market.

﻿

Currency fluctuations can be the largest variable affecting our overall sales and profit performance, as we experienced in fiscal year 2015 and 2016, as many of our markets are susceptible to foreign currency exchange rate volatility. In the first six months of fiscal year 2017, approximately 77% of our net warehouse sales were in currencies other than the U.S. dollar. Meanwhile, approximately 51% of net warehouse sales were comprised of sales of products we purchased in U.S. dollars that were sold in countries whose currencies were other than the U.S. dollar.

﻿

Currency exchange rate fluctuations also affect our consolidated sales and membership income as local-currency-denominated sales are translated to U.S. dollars, which can impact year over year growth when measured in U.S. dollars compared to local currency growth rates. In addition, we revalue on a monthly basis all U.S. dollar-denominated monetary assets and liabilities within our markets that do not use the U.S. dollar as their functional currency. These monetary assets and liabilities

29

Table of Contents

include, but are not limited to, excess cash permanently reinvested offshore, U.S. dollar-denominated long-term debt used to finance land acquisitions and the construction of warehouse clubs, and U.S. dollar-denominated accounts payable related to the purchase of merchandise. We report the gains or losses associated with the revaluation of these monetary assets and liabilities on our Consolidated Statements of Income under the heading “Other income (expense), net.”

﻿

Our consolidated results of operations in fiscal years 2015 and 2016 were adversely affected by a major decline in the value of the Colombian peso (COP) relative to the U.S. dollar beginning in August 2014, which negatively impacted sales and margins in that market. Over the course of fiscal year 2016, the devaluation of the Colombian peso against the U.S. dollar resulted in decreased U.S. dollar reported warehouse clubs sales and membership income, after translation, by approximately 26% when compared to fiscal year 2015. A significant devaluation of the local currency relative to the U.S. dollar in a country in which we do business not only reduces the value of sales and membership income that is generated in that country when translated to U.S. dollars for our consolidated results, but also increases the local currency price of imported merchandise and thus the prices we charge our members, which impacts demand for a significant portion of the Company’s merchandise offering. In Colombia, the exchange rate between the Colombian peso and the U.S. dollar has stabilized over the past nine months, with average monthly rates between 2,900 and 3,100 pesos to the dollar from June 2016 to February 2017. As a result, our business performance in Colombia has seen steady improvement in the first two quarters of fiscal year 2017.

﻿

Where possible, we seek to minimize the impact of negative foreign exchange fluctuations on our results by utilizing from time to time one or more of the following strategies: (1) adjusting prices on goods acquired in U.S. dollars on a periodic basis to maintain our target margins after taking into account changes in exchange rates and our competition; (2) obtaining local currency loans from banks within certain markets where it is economical to do so and where management believes the risk of devaluation and the level of U.S. dollar denominated liabilities warrants this action; (3) reducing the time between the acquisition of product in U.S. dollars and the settlement of that purchase in local currency; (4) maintaining a balance between assets held in local currency and in U.S. dollars; and (5) entering into cross-currency interest rate swaps and non-deliverable forward contracts. We have local-currency-denominated long-term loans in Honduras and Guatemala and have employed cross-currency interest rate swaps in Colombia, Costa Rica and Honduras and non-deliverable forward contracts in Costa Rica and Colombia. Future volatility regarding currencies could have a material impact on our operations in future periods; however, there is no way to accurately forecast the impact of the change in rates on our future demand for imported products, reported sales or financial results.

﻿

In some of our Central American and Caribbean markets, overall economic activity during the first half of fiscal year 2017 has been sluggish, which has adversely affected the level of consumer spending during the period. For example, Trinidad’s economy, which has been significantly harmed by declining oil and gas exports and which has been further slowed by government policies intended to manage its foreign exchange reserves, has been experiencing overall difficult economic conditions with a corresponding impact on consumer spending.

﻿

Our capture of retail and wholesale sales can vary from market to market due to competition and the availability of other retail options for the consumer. In larger, more developed countries, such as Costa Rica, Panama and Colombia, customers have many alternatives available to them to satisfy their shopping needs, and therefore, our market share is less than in other smaller countries, such as Jamaica and Nicaragua, where consumers have a limited number of shopping options.

﻿

Demographic characteristics within each of our markets can also affect both the overall level of sales and also future sales growth opportunities. Island countries such as Aruba, Barbados and the U.S. Virgin Islands offer us limited upside for sales growth given their overall market size. Countries with a smaller upper and middle class consumer population, such as Honduras, El Salvador, Jamaica and Nicaragua, also have a more limited potential opportunity for sales growth as compared to more developed countries with a larger upper and middle class consumer population.

﻿

Political and other factors in each of our markets may have significant effects on our business. For example, when national elections are being held, the political situation can introduce uncertainty about how the leadership change may impact the economy, which adversely affects near-term consumer spending. Similarly, the need for increased tax revenue in certain countries can cause changes in tax policies that affect consumers’ personal tax rates and/or consumption taxes, such as VAT (value-added taxes), which effectively raise the prices of various products. In addition, if a major employer in a market reduces its work force, as has happened in the past in Aruba and Costa Rica, overall consumer spending can suffer.

﻿

From time to time we have experienced a lack of availability of U.S. dollars in certain markets (U.S. dollar illiquidity). This impedes our ability to convert local currencies obtained through warehouse sales into U.S. dollars to settle the U.S. dollar liabilities associated with our imported products. In the second half of fiscal year 2016 and continuing into fiscal year 2017, we have been experiencing this situation in Trinidad (“TT”). We are limited in our ability to convert TT dollars that we generate through sales of merchandise into U.S. dollars to settle U.S. dollar liabilities, increasing the amounts owed to PriceSmart, Inc. from our Trinidad subsidiary. We are working with our banks to source other tradeable currencies (such as Euros and Canadian dollars), but until the central bank in Trinidad makes more U.S. dollars available, this condition will continue. As of February 28, 2017, the imbalance of shipments made to Trinidad compared to the availability of U.S. dollars that we could obtain in Trinidad

30

Table of Contents

to pay for those shipments resulted in U.S. dollar-denominated liabilities of approximately $16.0 million. These liabilities are exposed to a potential devaluation of the Trinidad dollar compared to the U.S. dollar which, according to a report issued by the International Monetary Fund in 2016, could be overvalued by 20% or more. If, for example, a hypothetical 20% devaluation of the TT currency occurred, the net effect on other expense would be approximately $3.2 million given that level of dollar-denominated liabilities. In addition, to the extent we are unable to exchange TT dollars for U.S. dollars, this causes delays in payments owed to us by our Trinidad subsidiary which, in turn, reduces our ability to deploy that cash for other corporate purposes. In response to the uncertain state of tradable currency in Trinidad, we took steps to limit our exposure. Beginning in November we reduced new shipments of merchandise to Trinidad from our distribution center in Miami to levels that generally aligned with our Trinidad subsidiary’s ability to pay for the merchandise in U.S. dollars. This reduced level of shipments adversely affected sales in the second quarter, particularly December, although less than our initial estimate of $8.0 million to $12.0 million. These actions did not impact the level of merchandise we obtain locally in Trinidad. Most recently, we have been able to improve our sourcing of tradeable currencies which has allowed for a more normalized flow of imported merchandise as we enter the third fiscal quarter. However, the illiquidity situation remains in that market, and we have not been able to fully address the level of dollar-denominated liabilities. Going forward, we could again find ourselves in a position that requires us to limit shipments from the U.S. to Trinidad in line with our ability to exchange TT dollars for tradeable currencies or to reduce our exposure to a potential devaluation. This may result in our Trinidad subsidiary running out of certain merchandise, from time to time during the remainder of the year, which could negatively impact sales in Trinidad.

Business Strategy

﻿

Our business strategy is to offer for sale to businesses and families a limited number of stock keeping units (SKU's) covering a wide range of products in high volumes and at the lowest possible prices. We charge an annual membership fee to our customers. These fees, combined with warehouse and distribution operating efficiencies and volume purchasing, enable us to operate our business on lower merchandise margins than conventional retail stores and wholesale suppliers. The combination of annual membership fees, operating efficiencies and low margins enable us to offer our members high quality merchandise at very competitive prices which, in turn, enhances the membership proposition.

Current and Future Management Actions

﻿

Generally, our operating efficiencies, earnings and cash flow improve as sales increase. Higher sales provide greater purchasing power which often translates into lower cost of merchandise from our suppliers and lower prices for our members. Higher sales, coupled with continuous efforts to improve efficiencies through our distribution network and within our warehouse clubs, also give us the opportunity to leverage our operating costs and reduce prices for our members.

﻿

We seek to grow sales by increasing transaction size and shopping frequency of our members by providing high quality, differentiated merchandise at a good value. We also grow sales by attracting new members and improving the capacity of our existing warehouse clubs to serve the growing membership base and level of sales in those locations. Finally, sales growth is also achieved when we add new warehouse clubs with a corresponding increase in members in those markets that can support that growth. Sales during fiscal year 2016 were positively impacted by the three new warehouse clubs that opened in Colombia in the fall of 2014, another new warehouse club in Panama that opened in June 2015 and a new warehouse club in Nicaragua that opened in November 2015. In the current fiscal year we opened a new warehouse club in Chia, Colombia in September. Although we recognize that opening new warehouse club locations in certain existing markets can have adverse short-term implications for comparable store growth, as the new warehouse club will often attract sales from existing locations, each decision to add a location in an existing market is based on a long-term outlook. Overall, for the second quarter of fiscal year 2017, net warehouse sales increased 1.8% when compared to the same period a year ago.

﻿

One of the distinguishing features of the warehouse club format is the role membership plays both in terms of pricing and member loyalty. Membership fees are considered a component of overall gross margin and therefore allow us to reduce merchandise prices. In most of our markets, the annual membership fee is the equivalent of U.S. $35 for both business members and non-business “Diamond” members. In Colombia, the membership fee has been 65,000 (COP) (including VAT) since our initial entrance into the Colombian market. The Colombian peso (COP) was trading at approximately 2,000 COP to $1.00 US dollar at that time. More recently, the Colombian peso has been trading a t approximately 3,000 COP to $1.00 US dollar so that the converted membership price in U.S. dollars has gone from approximately U.S. $30 to approximately U.S. $20. In February, we raised the membership fee in Colombia to 75,000 COP. In addition to the standard warehouse club membership, we offer in Costa Rica what we call Platinum membership for $75. A Platinum membership earns a 2% rebate on annual purchases up to a maximum of $500 rebate per year. We expect to offer this type of membership in at least one other country later this year.

﻿

Logistics and distribution efficiencies are an important part of what allows us to deliver high quality merchandise at low prices to our members. We acquire a significant amount of merchandise internationally, which we receive primarily at our Miami distribution centers. We then ship the merchandise either directly to our warehouse clubs or to regional distribution centers located in some of our larger markets. Our ability to efficiently receive, handle and distribute merchandise to the point where our members put that merchandise into their shopping carts has a significant impact on our level of operating expenses and ultimately

31

Table of Contents

how low we can price our merchandise. We continue to explore ways to improve efficiency, reduce costs and ensure a good flow of merchandise to our warehouse clubs. We have added local and regional distribution centers in several of our markets to improve merchandise flow and in-stock conditions and reduce operating costs, the benefit of which can be passed on to our members in the form of lower merchandise prices. These locations are generally leased, and the addition of new locations or expansion of current capacity will not require significant investment. Additionally, in January 2017 we purchased a distribution center in Medley, Miami-Dade County, Florida, into which we w ill transfer the majority of our current leased Miami distribution center activities during the third quarter of fiscal year 2017. This new distribution facility will increase our ability to efficiently receive, handle and distribute merchandise.

﻿

We offer our members alternatives to in-club shopping through our e-commerce platform which enables on-line access to purchase merchandise in different ways. Members have the ability to purchase certain merchandise that is not stocked in their local warehouse clubs by placing an order that we fulfill by shipping the merchandise from our U.S. distribution warehouse for pick-up at the member's local warehouse club location. In Colombia, members also can purchase in-club merchandise on-line from warehouse clubs located within the market and have it delivered to their home or office via a third-party delivery service. We have been expanding our online offerings, and while the percentage of sales through these channels relative to our overall sales is small, we believe it is an important and growing way to serve our current members and attract new members.

﻿

Purchasing land and constructing warehouse clubs is generally our largest ongoing capital investment. Securing land for warehouse club locations is challenging within our markets, especially in Colombia, because suitable sites at economically feasible prices are difficult to find. While our preference is to own rather than lease real estate, we have entered into real estate leases in certain cases (most recently our Bogota, Colombia site) and will likely do so in the future. Real estate ownership provides a number of advantages as compared to leasing, including lower operating expenses, flexibility to expand or otherwise enhance our buildings, long-term control over the use of the property and the residual value that the real estate may have in future years. In order to secure warehouse club locations, we occasionally have purchased more land than is actually needed for the warehouse club facility. To the extent that we acquire property in excess of what is needed for a particular warehouse club, we generally have looked to either sell or develop the excess property. Excess land at Alajuela (Costa Rica) and Brisas (Panama) is being developed by joint ventures formed by us and the sellers of the property. We are employing a similar development strategy for the excess land at the San Fernando, Trinidad and Arroyo Hondo, Dominican Republic locations where the properties are fully owned by us. The profitable sale or development of real estate is highly dependent on real estate market conditions.

﻿

﻿

Financial highlights for the second quarter of fiscal year 2017 included:

﻿

| · |  | Net warehouse club sales increased 1.8% over the comparable prior year period. We ended the quarter with 39 warehouse clubs compared to 38 warehouse clubs at the end of the second quarter of fiscal year 2016. Comparable warehouse club sales (that is, sales in the warehouse clubs that have been open for greater than 13 1/2 calendar months) for the 13 weeks ended March 5, 2017 were 2.1% above the comparable 13-week period last year.

| · |  | Membership income for the second quarter of fiscal year 201 7 inc reased 4.9% t o $11.8 million.

| · |  | Warehouse gross profits (net warehouse club sales less associated cost of goods sold) as a percent of net warehouse club sales in creased 4.6% over the prior year period and warehouse gross profits as a percent of net warehouse club sales were 14.6%, a n in crease of 40 basis points (0.40%) from the same period last year.

| · |  | Operating income for the second quarter of fiscal year 2017 was $39.4 million, an in crease of $0.3 million over the second quarter of fiscal year 2016.

| · |  | We recorded a $915,000 net gain from currency gain or losses in the current quarter compared to a $(552,000) net loss from currency exchange transactions in the same period last year.

| · |  | The effective tax rate for second quarter of fiscal year 2017 is 30.6%, as compared to the effective tax rate for the second quarter of fiscal year 2016 of 31.7%.

| · |  | Net income for th e second quarter of fiscal year 2017 was $27.2 million, or $0.90 per diluted share, compared to $25.9 million, or $0.85 per diluted share, in the comparable prior year period.

﻿

Financial highlights for the six months ending February 28, 2017 included:

﻿

| · |  | Net warehouse club sales increased 2.7% over the comparable prior year period. We ended the quarter with 39 warehouse clubs compared to 38 warehouse clubs at the end of the second quarter of fiscal year 2016. Comparable warehouse club sales (that is, sales in the warehouse clubs that have been open for greater than 13 1/2 calendar months) for the 26 weeks ended March 6, 2017 grew 1.1% from the comparable 13-week period a year ago.

| · |  | Membership income for the first six months of fiscal year 201 7 inc reased 3.5% t o $23.5 million.

| · |  | Warehouse gross profits (net warehouse club sales less associated cost of goods sold) as a percent of net warehouse club sales for the first six months of fiscal year 2017 were 14.8%, a n in crease of 43 basis points (0.43%) from the same period last year.

| · |  | Operating income for the first six months of fiscal year 2017 was $77.8 million, an in crease of $1.4 million over the first six months of fiscal year 2016.

32

Table of Contents

| · |  | Net gains from currency exchange transactions in the second quarter of fiscal year 2017 offset the losses recorded in the first quarter of the year resulting in a minimal loss of $13,000 for the six month period ending February 28, 2017. Last year, currency exchange transactions for the six month period were a net loss of $796,000.

| · |  | The effective tax rate for the first six months of fiscal year 2017 is 31.0%, as compared to the effective tax rate for the first six months of fiscal year 2016 of 32.7%.

| · |  | Net income for th e first six months of fiscal year 2017 was $52.1 million, or $1.72 per diluted share, compared to $49.6 million, or $1.63 per diluted share, in the comparable prior year period.

﻿

COMPARISON OF THE THREE AND SIX MONTHS ENDED FEBRUARY 28, 201 7 AND FEBRUARY 29, 201 6

﻿

The following discussion and analysis compares the results of operations for the three-month and six-month period s ended on February 28, 2017 with the three-month and six-month period s ended on February 29, 2016 and should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes included elsewhere in this report. Unless otherwise noted, all tables on the following pages present U.S. dollar amounts in thousands. Certain percentages presented are calculated using actual results prior to rounding.

﻿

Net Warehouse Club Sales

﻿

The following tables indicate the net warehouse club sales in the segments in which we operate, and the percentage growth in net warehouse club sales by segment during the three and six months ended February 28, 2017 and 2016.

﻿

﻿

﻿

﻿ |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
﻿ |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
﻿ |  | Three Months Ended
﻿ |  | February 28, 2017 |  | February 29, 2016
﻿ |  | Amount |  | % of net sales |  | Increase/ (decrease) from prior year |  | Change |  | Amount |  | % of net sales
Central America |  | $ | 465,808 |  | 60.3 | % |  | $ | (1,159) |  | (0.2) | % |  | $ | 466,967 |  | 61.5 | %
Caribbean |  |  | 216,403 |  | 28.0 | % |  |  | (10,552) |  | (4.6) | % |  |  | 226,955 |  | 29.9 | %
Colombia |  |  | 90,062 |  | 11.6 | % |  |  | 24,997 |  | 38.4 | % |  |  | 65,065 |  | 8.6 | %
Net warehouse club sales |  | $ | 772,273 |  | 100.0 | % |  | $ | 13,286 |  | 1.8 | % |  | $ | 758,987 |  | 100.0 | %

﻿

﻿

﻿

﻿ |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
﻿ |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
﻿ |  | Six Months Ended
﻿ |  | February 28, 2017 |  | February 29, 2016
﻿ |  | Amount |  | % of net sales |  | Increase/ (decrease) from prior year |  | Change |  | Amount |  | % of net sales
Central America |  | $ | 895,985 |  | 60.2 | % |  | $ | 13,546 |  | 1.5 | % |  | $ | 882,439 |  | 60.9 | %
Caribbean |  |  | 420,303 |  | 28.2 | % |  |  | (15,251) |  | (3.5) | % |  |  | 435,554 |  | 30.0 | %
Colombia |  |  | 172,064 |  | 11.6 | % |  |  | 40,239 |  | 30.5 | % |  |  | 131,825 |  | 9.1 | %
Net warehouse club sales |  | $ | 1,488,352 |  | 100.0 | % |  | $ | 38,534 |  | 2.7 | % |  | $ | 1,449,818 |  | 100.0 | %

﻿

﻿

Comparison of Three Months and Six Months Ended February 28, 2017 and February 29, 2016

﻿

Net warehouse sales in Central America for the second quarter of fiscal year 2017 declined 0.2% largely as a result of weakness in our Costa Rica market where sales declined 4.9% (a 1.3% decline in local currency). Panama, Guatemala and Honduras all recorded positive growth in warehouse sales. For the six-month period, Central America sales grew 1.5% and were aided by the sales associated with the additional club in Nicaragua which opened at the end of November 2016.

﻿

Many of our Caribbean markets experienced sales declines in the quarter and six month periods compared to a year ago, with only Jamaica and USVI recording year on year growth for the second quarter. Trinidad is our largest market in that segment, and the difficult economic environment, including the Company’s decision to limit shipments during the period resulted in a 9.6% decline in net warehouse sales compared to a year ago for the quarter and 7.4% for the six-month period.

﻿

33

Table of Contents

Net warehouse sales in Colombia had good growth with the addition of our new Chia club on September 1 contributing to an overall sales growth of 38.4% in th e quarter and 30.5% for the six-month period. With the stabilization of the exchange rate between the Colombian peso and the U.S. dollar over the past nine months, we have seen an improving sales picture in all of our warehouse clubs in Colombia. This, coupled with our efforts to source high quality merchandise from local suppliers, resulted in a 15.9% increase in transactions this quarter. The second quarter growth in average ticket of 19.4% was aided by an improved exchange rate between the Colombian peso and the U.S. dollar. In the second quarter of fiscal year 2016, the average exchange rate was 3,283 pesos to the dollar. In the current period the rate was 2,951. Measured in local currency, the average ticket during the second fiscal quarter grew 7.4%.

Comparable Sales

﻿

We report comparable warehouse club sales on a “same week” basis with 13 weeks in each quarter beginning on a Monday and ending on a Sunday. The periods are established at the beginning of the fiscal year to provide as close a match as possible to the calendar month and quarter that is used for financial reporting purposes. This approach equalizes the number of weekend days and weekdays in each period for improved sales comparison, as we experience higher warehouse club sales on the weekends. Further, each of the warehouse clubs used in the calculations was open for at least 13 ½ calendar months before its results for the current period were compared with its results for the prior period. For example, the sales related to the warehouse club opened in Bogota, Colombia on October 29, 2014 were not used in the calculation of comparable sales until January 2016. Sales related to the warehouse clubs opened in Pereira and Medellin, Colombia on November 13, 2014 and November 26, 2014, respectively, were not used in the calculation of comparable sales until January and February 2016, respectively. Sales related to the warehouse club opened in Panama (“Costa Verde”) in June 2015 and the warehouse club opened in Nicaragua opened in November 2015 will not be used in the calculation of comparable sales until September 2016 and January 2017, respectively. Sales related to the warehouse club opened in Colombia in September 2016 will not be used in the calculation of comparable sales until November 2017.

﻿

As part of the expansion of our e-commerce program, we began direct home delivery of products not carried in our warehouse clubs to members in Colombia in August 2015. For e-commerce sales, revenue is recognized upon pickup of the merchandise by the member or when the common carrier takes possession of the merchandise. Sales related to these e-commerce sales in Colombia were not used in the calculation of comparable sales until October 2016. E-commerce sales of products where the product is sourced from one of our warehouse clubs and delivered to the member’s home and sales of products that are not carried in our clubs, but are delivered to clubs and picked up by our members, are reflected in the comparable sales for the warehouse club from which the inventory was sourced or picked up.

﻿

Comparable warehouse club sales for those warehouse clubs that were open for at least 13 ½ months for some or all of the 13 week period ending March 5, 2017 grew 2.1%, and for the 26 week period grew 1.1%. The negative sales growth in the Caribbean segment, driven largely by Trinidad, offset positive comparable sales growth in the Central American and Colombian segments despite some cannibalized sales resulting from the new warehouse club in Managua, Nicaragua and the new warehouse club in Chia, Colombia. These new warehouse clubs are not far from existing warehouse clubs that are included in the calculation for comparable warehouse club sales. The new warehouse clubs are attracting new members from areas not previously served by us, but they are also creating the opportunity for some existing members, particularly those who now find the new clubs closer to their homes, to shop at the new locations. This transfer of sales from existing warehouse clubs that are included in the calculation of comparable warehouse club sales to new warehouse clubs that are not included in the calculation has an adverse impact on comparable warehouse club sales.

﻿

﻿

Export Sales

﻿

﻿

﻿ |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
﻿ |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
﻿ |  | Three Months Ended
﻿ |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
﻿ |  | February 28, 2017 |  | February 29, 2016
﻿ |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
﻿ |  | Amount |  | % of net sales |  | Increase from prior year |  | Change |  | Amount |  | % of net sales
Export sales |  | $ | 8,172 |  | 1.1 | % |  | $ | 1,623 |  | 24.8 | % |  | $ | 6,549 |  | 0.9 | %

﻿

﻿

﻿

34

Table of Contents

﻿

﻿

﻿ |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
﻿ |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
﻿ |  | Six Months Ended
﻿ |  | February 28, 2017 |  | February 29, 2016
﻿ |  | Amount |  | % of net sales |  | Increase from prior year |  | Change |  | Amount |  | % of net sales
Export sales |  | $ | 18,906 |  | 1.3 | % |  | $ | 4,125 |  | 27.9 | % |  | $ | 14,781 |  | 1.0 | %

﻿

Export sales are direct sales to a single institutional customer (retailer) in the Philippines for which we earn an approximately 5% margin. Changes in the activity in the three months ended February 28, 2017 compared to the prior year periods reflects changes in the merchandise needs of that retailer’s business.

Membership Income

﻿

﻿

﻿ |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
﻿ |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
﻿ |  | Three Months Ended
﻿ |  | February 28, |  | February 29,
﻿ |  | 2017 |  | 2016
﻿ |  | Amount |  | Increase from prior year |  | % Change |  | Amount
Membership income |  | $ | 11,833 |  |  | $ | 548 |  | 4.9 | % |  | $ | 11,285 |
Membership income % to net warehouse club sales |  |  | 1.5 | % |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 1.5 | %
Number of total accounts |  |  | 1,514,183 |  |  |  | 49,299 |  | 3.4 | % |  |  | 1,464,884 |

﻿

﻿

﻿ |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
﻿ |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
﻿ |  | Six Months Ended
﻿ |  | February 28, |  | February 29,
﻿ |  | 2017 |  | 2016
﻿ |  | Amount |  | Increase from prior year |  | % Change |  | Amount
Membership income |  | $ | 23,543 |  |  | $ | 792 |  | 3.5 | % |  | $ | 22,751 |
Membership income % to net warehouse club sales |  |  | 1.6 | % |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 1.6 | %
Number of total accounts |  |  | 1,514,183 |  |  |  | 49,299 |  | 3.4 | % |  |  | 1,464,884 |

﻿

﻿

﻿

Comparison of Three and Six Months Ended February 28, 2017 and February 29, 2016

﻿

Membership income is recognized ratably over the one-year life of the membership. The increase in membership income primarily reflects a growth in membership accounts for which income is recognized. The average number of member accounts during the second qua rter of fiscal year 2017 was 3.2% higher than the year before. The income recognized per average member account increased 1.6% in the current fiscal quarter, largely attributable to the improved exchange rate for membership income in Colombia when converted to U.S. dollars. For the six-month period, the average number of accounts for which membership income was recognized increased 2.2% and the income recognized per average member increased 1.2%.

﻿

The Company had a net increase of 14,505 membership accounts in the quarter. Membership accounts in Colombia increased 6,479 on improving renewal rates and the addition of new membership accounts. For the six-month period, membership accounts for the Company and Colombia increased 23,759 and 9,979, respectively. The Company’s twelve-month renewal rate for the period ended February 28, 2017 improved to 83% from the twelve-month period ending August 31, 2016 rate of 80%. Excluding Colombia, the twelve-month renewal rate was 86% as of February 28, 2017. While improving, the renewal rate of current members in Colombia is below that which we experience in other markets.

35

Table of Contents

Other Income

﻿

﻿

﻿ |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
﻿ |  | Three Months Ended
﻿ |  | February 28, |  | February 29,
﻿ |  | 2017 |  | 2016
﻿ |  | Amount |  | (Decrease) from prior year |  | % Change |  | Amount
Other income |  | $ | 1,018 |  |  | $ | (92) |  | (8.3) | % |  | $ | 1,110 |

﻿

﻿

﻿

﻿ |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
﻿ |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
﻿ |  | Six Months Ended
﻿ |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
﻿ |  | February 28, |  | February 29,
﻿ |  | 2017 |  | 2016
﻿ |  | Amount |  | (Decrease) from prior year |  | % Change |  | Amount
Other income |  | $ | 2,067 |  |  | $ | (445) |  | (17.7) | % |  | $ | 2,512 |

﻿

﻿

Comparison of Three and Six Months Ended February 28, 2017 and February 29, 201 6

﻿

Other income for the quarter was approximately equal to the prior year. For the six-month period, the period-over-period decrease was primarily attributable to a $202,000 gain recorded in the first quarter of fiscal year 2016 associated with an insurance recovery for the fire in the Pradera, Guatemala warehouse club in June 2015.

Gross Margin

﻿

Warehouse Gross Profit Margin

﻿

﻿

﻿ |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
﻿ |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
﻿ |  | Three Months Ended
﻿ |  | February 28, 2017 |  | February 29, 2016
﻿ |  | Amount |  | Increase/ (decrease) from prior year |  | % to sales |  | Amount |  | % to sales
Warehouse club sales |  | $ | 772,273 |  | $ | 13,286 |  | 100.0 | % |  | $ | 758,987 |  | 100.0 | %
Less associated cost of goods |  |  | 659,802 |  |  | 8,302 |  | 85.4 | % |  |  | 651,500 |  | 85.8 | %
Warehouse gross profit margin |  | $ | 112,471 |  | $ | 4,984 |  | 14.6 | % |  | $ | 107,487 |  | 14.2 | %

﻿

﻿

﻿

﻿ |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
﻿ |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
﻿ |  | Six Months Ended
﻿ |  | February 28, 2017 |  | February 29, 2016
﻿ |  | Amount |  | Increase/ (decrease) from prior year |  | % to sales |  | Amount |  | % to sales
Warehouse club sales |  | $ | 1,488,352 |  | $ | 38,534 |  | 100.0 | % |  | $ | 1,449,818 |  | 100.0 | %
Less associated cost of goods |  |  | 1,268,292 |  |  | 26,609 |  | 85.2 | % |  |  | 1,241,683 |  | 85.6 | %
Warehouse gross profit margin |  | $ | 220,060 |  | $ | 11,925 |  | 14.8 | % |  | $ | 208,135 |  | 14.4 | %

﻿

Comparison of Three and Six Months Ended February 28, 2017 and February 29, 2016

﻿

For the three-month and six-month periods ended February 28, 2017, warehouse gross profit margin as a percent of sales was 40 basis points (0.40%) higher than the three months ended February 29, 2016 and 43 basis points higher for the six month period. In both comparisons, the increase was largely attributable to higher warehouse gross profit margins in Colombia, resulting from the improving conditions in that market, including reduced markdowns from a year ago.

﻿

36

Table of Contents

﻿

Export Sales Gross Profit Margin

﻿

﻿

﻿ |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
﻿ |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
﻿ |  | Three Months Ended
﻿ |  | February 28, 2017 |  | February 29, 2016
﻿ |  | Amount |  | Increase/ (decrease) from prior year |  | % to sales |  | Amount |  | % to sales
Export sales |  | $ | 8,172 |  | $ | 1,623 |  | 100.0 | % |  | $ | 6,549 |  | 100.0 | %
Less associated cost of goods sold |  |  | 7,761 |  |  | 1,536 |  | 95.0 | % |  |  | 6,225 |  | 95.1 | %
Export sales gross profit margin |  | $ | 411 |  | $ | 87 |  | 5.0 | % |  | $ | 324 |  | 4.9 | %

﻿

﻿

﻿

﻿ |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
﻿ |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
﻿ |  | Six Months Ended
﻿ |  | February 29, 2016 |  | February 29, 2016
﻿ |  | Amount |  | Increase/ (decrease) from prior year |  | % to sales |  | Amount |  | % to sales
Export sales |  | $ | 18,906 |  | $ | 4,125 |  | 100.0 | % |  | $ | 14,781 |  | 100.0 | %
Less associated cost of goods sold |  |  | 17,942 |  |  | 3,885 |  | 94.9 | % |  |  | 14,057 |  | 95.1 | %
Export sales gross profit margin |  | $ | 964 |  | $ | 240 |  | 5.1 | % |  | $ | 724 |  | 4.9 | %

﻿

﻿

Comparison of Three and Six Months Ended February 28, 2017 and February 29, 2016

﻿

The increase in export sales gross margin dollars for the three and six months ended February 28, 2017 compared to the same period a year ago was due to an in crease in direct sales to an institutional customer (retailer) in the Philippines for which we generally earn lower margins than those obtained through our warehouse club sales.

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses

﻿

Warehouse Club Operations

﻿

﻿

﻿ |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
﻿ |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
﻿ |  | Three Months Ended
﻿ |  | February 28, 2017 |  |  | February 29, 2016
﻿ |  | Amount |  | % to warehouse club sales |  | Increase from prior year |  | % Change |  | Amount |  | % to warehouse club sales
Warehouse club operations expense |  | $ | 67,784 |  | 8.8 | % |  | $ | 3,021 |  | 4.7 | % |  | $ | 64,763 |  | 8.5 | %

﻿

﻿

﻿ |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
﻿ |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
﻿ |  | Six Months Ended
﻿ |  | February 28, 2017 |  | February 29, 2016
﻿ |  | Amount |  | % to warehouse club sales |  | Increase from prior year |  | % Change |  | Amount |  | % to warehouse club sales
Warehouse club operations expense |  | $ | 133,210 |  | 9.0 | % |  | $ | 7,607 |  | 6.1 | % |  | $ | 125,603 |  | 8.7 | %

﻿

﻿

﻿

Comparison of Three and Six Months Ended February 28, 2017 and February 29, 2016

﻿

W arehouse club operations expense for the second quarter of fiscal year 2017 was 8.8% of warehouse club sales. This reflects a 25 basis point (0.25%) increase from the same quarter last year. For the six months ended February 28, 2017, warehouse club operating expenses w ere 9.0% of warehouse club sales, a 29 basis point (0.29%) increase from the same period last year. Low or negative comparable sales growth in a number of our Caribbean markets and in Costa Rica, contributed to an overall increase in warehouse expense as a percent of sales. Colombia had a reduction in warehouse club operations expense as a percent

37

Table of Contents

of sales for the quarter and six month period of 128 basis points (1.28%) and 66 basis points (0.66%), respectively, due to the higher sales compared to the year-ago periods.

﻿

General and Administrative Expenses

﻿

﻿

﻿ |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
﻿ |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
﻿ |  | Three Months Ended
﻿ |  | February 28, 2017 |  | February 29, 2016
﻿ |  | Amount |  | % to warehouse club sales |  | Increase from prior year |  | % Change |  | Amount |  | % to warehouse club sales
General and administrative expenses |  | $ | 18,212 |  | 2.4 | % |  | $ | 2,028 |  | 12.5 | % |  | $ | 16,184 |  | 2.1 | %

﻿

﻿

﻿

﻿

﻿ |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
﻿ |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
﻿ |  | Six Months Ended
﻿ |  | February 28, 2017 |  | February 29, 2016
﻿ |  | Amount |  | % to warehouse club sales |  | Increase from prior year |  | % Change |  | Amount |  | % to warehouse club sales
General and administrative expenses |  | $ | 35,014 |  | 2.4 | % |  | $ | 3,367 |  | 10.6 | % |  | $ | 31,647 |  | 2.2 | %

﻿

﻿

Comparison of Three and Six Months Ended February 28, 2017 and February 29, 2016

﻿

For the three- and six-month periods ended February 28, 2017, general and administrative expenses grew 12.5% and 10.6%, respectively, compared to the year ago quarter. Year-on-year increased spending resulted primarily from increased staffing in our buying department, higher deferred compensation expense, and information technology costs. In addition, the growth in expenses in the six-month period includes costs associated with the relocation of an executive to our San Diego headquarters.

﻿

Pre-Opening Expenses

﻿

Expenses incurred before a warehouse club is in operation are captured in pre-opening expenses.

﻿

﻿

﻿ |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
﻿ |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
﻿ |  | Three Months Ended
﻿ |  | February 28, |  | February 29,
﻿ |  | 2017 |  | 2016
﻿ |  | Amount |  | (Decrease) from prior year |  | % Change |  | Amount
Pre-opening expenses |  | $ | — |  | $ | (71) |  | (100.0) | % |  | $ | 71

﻿

﻿

﻿ |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
﻿ |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
﻿ |  | Six Months Ended
﻿ |  | February 28, |  | February 29,
﻿ |  | 2017 |  | 2016
﻿ |  | Amount |  | (Decrease) from prior year |  | % Change |  | Amount
Pre-opening expenses |  | $ | (113) |  | $ | (489) |  | (130.1) | % |  | $ | 376

﻿

﻿

﻿

Comparison of Three and Six Months Ended February 28, 2017 and February 29, 2016

﻿

The Company did not incur any pre-opening expenses in the current quarter. There was a credit to pre-opening expenses in the quarter ended November 30, 2016 resulting from corrections to the amount recorded for the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2016 following the opening of the Chia, Colombia club. Pre-opening expenses in fiscal year 2016 were primarily related to the Managua, Nicaragua warehouse club which opened in November 2016.

﻿

﻿

38

Table of Contents

Loss/(Gain) on Disposal of Assets

﻿

Asset disposal activity consisted mainly of normally scheduled asset replacement and upgrades.

﻿

﻿

﻿ |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
﻿ |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
﻿ |  | Three Months Ended
﻿ |  | February 28, |  | February 29,
﻿ |  | 2017 |  | 2016
﻿ |  | Amount |  | Increase from prior year |  | % Change |  | Amount
Loss/(gain) on disposal of assets |  | $ | 335 |  | $ | 283 |  | 544.2 | % |  | $ | 52

﻿

﻿

﻿

﻿ |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
﻿ |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
﻿ |  | Six Months Ended
﻿ |  | February 28, |  | February 29,
﻿ |  | 2017 |  | 2016
﻿ |  | Amount |  | Increase from prior year |  | % Change |  | Amount
Loss/(gain) on disposal of assets |  | $ | 742 |  | $ | 677 |  | 1,041.5 | % |  | $ | 65

﻿

﻿

Operating Income

﻿

﻿

﻿ |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
﻿ |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
﻿ |  | Three Months Ended
﻿ |  | February 28, 2017 |  | February 29, 2016
﻿ |  | Amount |  | % to warehouse club sales |  | Increase from prior year |  | % Change |  | Amount |  | % to warehouse club sales
Operating income |  | $ | 39,402 |  | 5.1 | % |  | $ | 266 |  | 0.7 | % |  | $ | 39,136 |  | 5.2 | %

﻿

﻿

﻿

﻿ |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
﻿ |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
﻿ |  | Six Months Ended
﻿ |  | February 28, 2017 |  | February 29, 2016
﻿ |  | Amount |  | % to warehouse club sales |  | Increase from prior year |  | % Change |  | Amount |  | % to warehouse club sales
Operating income |  | $ | 77,781 |  | 5.2 | % |  | $ | 1,350 |  | 1.8 | % |  | $ | 76,431 |  | 5.3 | %

﻿

﻿

Comparison of Three and Six Months Ended February 28, 2017 and February 29, 201 6

﻿

For the three months ended February 28, 2017, operating income increased $300,000 compared to the prior year.

﻿

For the six months ended February 28, 2017, operating income increased $1.4 million compared to the prior year.

﻿

﻿

39

Table of Contents

Interest Expense

﻿

﻿ |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
﻿ |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
﻿ |  | Three Months Ended
﻿ |  | February 28, |  | February 29,
﻿ |  | 2017 |  | 2016
﻿ |  | Amount |  | Increase/ (decrease) from prior year |  | Amount
Interest expense on loans |  | $ | 1,342 |  | $ | 137 |  | $ | 1,205
Interest expense related to hedging activity |  |  | 358 |  |  | (113) |  |  | 471
Capitalized interest |  |  | (56) |  |  | 84 |  |  | (140)
Net interest expense |  | $ | 1,644 |  | $ | 108 |  | $ | 1,536

﻿

﻿

﻿ |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
﻿ |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
﻿ |  | Six Months Ended
﻿ |  | February 28, |  | February 29,
﻿ |  | 2017 |  | 2016
﻿ |  | Amount |  | Increase/ (decrease) from prior year |  | Amount
Interest expense on loans |  | $ | 2,760 |  | $ | 435 |  | $ | 2,325
Interest expense related to hedging activity |  |  | 782 |  |  | (236) |  |  | 1,018
Capitalized interest |  |  | (244) |  |  | 190 |  |  | (434)
Net interest expense |  | $ | 3,298 |  | $ | 389 |  | $ | 2,909

﻿

Comparison of Three and Six Months Ended February 28, 2017 and February 29, 2016

﻿

Interest expense reflects borrowings by PriceSmart, Inc. and our wholly owned foreign subsidiaries to finance new land acquisition and construction for new warehouse clubs, warehouse club expansions, and distribution centers, the capital requirements of warehouse club operations and ongoing working capital requirements.

﻿

Net interest expense for the three and six months ended February 28, 2017 increased from a year ago, with an increase in long-term debt, primarily to finance the acquisition of the distribution center in Miami, Florida and a decrease in interest capitalized. These incr eases are offset by a decrease i n interest expenses related to hedging activity. The decrease in interest expense related to hedging activity is a result of the retirement of loans and their related cross-currency interest rate hedges for our Colombia subsidiary.

﻿

Other Income (Expense), net

﻿

Other income consists of currency gain or loss.

﻿

﻿

﻿ |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
﻿ |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
﻿ |  | Three Months Ended
﻿ |  | February 28, |  | February 29,
﻿ |  | 2017 |  | 2016
﻿ |  | Amount |  | Increase from prior year |  | %Change |  | Amount
Other income (expense), net |  | $ | 915 |  | $ | 1,467 |  | (265.8) | % |  | $ | (552)

﻿

﻿

﻿

﻿

﻿ |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
﻿ |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
﻿ |  | Six Months Ended
﻿ |  | February 28, |  | February 29,
﻿ |  | 2017 |  | 2016
﻿ |  | Amount |  | Increase from prior year |  | %Change |  | Amount
Other income (expense), net |  | $ | (13) |  | $ | 783 |  | (98.4) | % |  | $ | (796)

﻿

40

Table of Contents

﻿

Monetary assets and liabilities denominated in currencies other than the functional currency of the respective entity (primarily U.S. dollars) are revalued to the functional currency using the exchange rate on the balance sheet date. These foreign exchange transaction gain s (losses), are recorded as currency gain s or losses.

﻿

Comparison of Three and Six Months Ended February 28, 2017 and February 29, 2016

﻿

For the three-month period, we had a net gain associated with foreign currency transactions. These gains resulted from the revaluation of net U.S. dollar assets in certain markets where the local functional currency devalued against the U.S. dollar, and from exchange transactions, net of any exchange reserve movements. The gains in the current quarter offset the losses in the first fiscal quarter where we experienced exchange losses in many of our foreign subsidiaries due to the strength of the U.S. dollar during a period when certain of our countries had net U.S dollar liabilities. In particular, Honduras experienced a larger than usual decline in its currency at a time when it had a foreign exchange exposure second only to Trinidad. We also incurred higher transaction costs associated with converting TT dollars into available tradeable currencies such as Euros or Canadian dollars before converting them to U.S. dollars. While that situation continues in Trinidad, we have taken that additional cost into consideration in our pricing model.

﻿

﻿

Provision for Income Taxes

﻿

﻿

﻿ |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
﻿ |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
﻿ |  | Three Months Ended
﻿ |  | February 28, |  | February 29,
﻿ |  | 2017 |  | 2016
﻿ |  | Amount |  | Increase/ (decrease) from prior year |  | Amount
Current tax expense |  | $ | 14,385 |  |  | $ | 2,115 |  | $ | 12,270 |
Net deferred tax provision (benefit) |  |  | (2,396) |  |  |  | (1,941) |  |  | (455) |
Provision for income taxes |  | $ | 11,989 |  |  | $ | 174 |  | $ | 11,815 |
Effective tax rate |  |  | 30.6 | % |  |  |  |  |  | 31.7 | %

﻿

﻿

﻿

﻿ |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
﻿ |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
﻿ |  | Six Months Ended
﻿ |  | February 28, |  | February 29,
﻿ |  | 2017 |  | 2016
﻿ |  | Amount |  | Increase/ (decrease) from prior year |  | Amount
Current tax expense |  | $ | 24,838 |  |  | $ | 909 |  | $ | 23,929 |
Net deferred tax provision (benefit) |  |  | (1,412) |  |  |  | (1,428) |  |  | 16 |
Provision for income taxes |  | $ | 23,426 |  |  | $ | (519) |  | $ | 23,945 |
Effective tax rate |  |  | 31.0 | % |  |  |  |  |  | 32.7 | %

﻿

﻿

﻿

Comparison of Three and Six Months Ended February 28, 2017 and February 29, 2016

﻿

For the three months ended February 28, 2017, the effective tax rate was 30.6%. The decrease in the effective tax rate versus the prior year was primarily attributable to the following factors: (i) an intercompany transaction between PriceSmart, Inc. and our Colombian subsidiary in support of PriceSmart’s ongoing market development and growth in Colombia. This intercompany transaction resulted in a favorable impact on the effective tax rate of 2.3% due to the reductions to taxable income in the U.S. and a resulting increase in taxable income in our Colombia subsidiary. This income did not generate income tax expense in Colombia because the additional taxable income in Colombia was fully offset by the reversal of valuation allowances on accumulated net losses in that subsidiary. We expect a similar favorable impact to the consolidated Company’s effective tax rate over the next several quarters; (ii) the favorable impact of 1.2% resulting from improved financial results in the Company’s Colombia subsidiary for which no tax benefit was recognized, net of adjustment to valuation allowance; (iii) the unfavorable impact of 1.6% primarily resulting from change s in the statutory income tax rates in foreign jurisdictions; (iv) the unfavorable impact of 0.6% due to the non-recurring of a favorable impact from the tax effect of foreign currency in the prior period.

41

Table of Contents

﻿

For the six months ended February 28, 2017, the effective tax rate was 31.0%. The decrease in the effective tax rate versus the prior year was primarily attributable to the following factors: (i) an intercompany transaction between PriceSmart, Inc. and our Colombian subsidiary in support of PriceSmart’s ongoing market development and growth in Colombia. This intercompany transaction resulted in a favorable impact on the effective tax rate of 1.9% due to the reductions to taxable income in the U.S. and a resulting increase in taxable income in our Colombia subsidiary. This income did not generate income tax expense in Colombia because the additional taxable income in Colombia was fully offset by the reversal of valuation allowances on accumulated net losses in that subsidiary. We expect a similar favorable impact to the consolidated Company’s effective tax rate over the next several quarters; (ii) the favorable impact of 0.9% resulting from improved financial results in the Company’s Colombia subsidiary for which no tax benefit was recognized, net of adjustment to valuation allowance; (iii) the unfavorable impact of 0.5% primarily resulting from change s in the statutory income tax rates in foreign jurisdictions.

﻿

Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)

﻿

﻿

﻿ |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
﻿ |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
﻿ |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
﻿ |  | Three Months Ended
﻿ |  | February 28, |  | February 29,
﻿ |  | 2017 |  | 2016
﻿ |  | Amount |  | Increase from prior year |  | % Change |  | Amount
Other comprehensive income (loss) |  | $ | 9,521 |  | $ | 20,156 |  | (189.5) | % |  | $ | (10,635)

﻿

﻿

﻿

﻿ |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
﻿ |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
﻿ |  | Six Months Ended
﻿ |  | February 28, |  | February 29,
﻿ |  | 2017 |  | 2016
﻿ |  | Amount |  | Increase from prior year |  | % Change |  | Amount
Other comprehensive income (loss) |  | $ | (860) |  | $ | 10,371 |  | (92.3) | % |  | $ | (11,231)

﻿

﻿

Comparison of Three and Six Months Ended February 28, 2017 and February 29, 2016

﻿

Our other comprehensive income of approximately $9.5 million for the second quarter of fiscal year 2017 resulted primarily from comprehensive income of approximately $9.2 million from foreign currency translation adjustments related to assets and liabilities and the translation of the statement of income related to revenue, costs and expenses of our subsidiaries whose functional currency is not the U.S. dollar and by comprehensive income of approximately $291,000 related to unrealized gains on changes in derivative obligations. When the functional currency in our international subsidiaries is the local currency and not U.S. dollars, the assets and liabilities of such subsidiaries are translated to U.S. dollars at the exchange rate on the balance sheet date, and revenue, costs and expenses are translated at average rates of exchange in effect during the period. The corresponding translation differences are recorded as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income or loss. These adjustments will not affect net income until the sale or liquidation of the underlying investment. The reported other comprehensive income or loss reflects the unrealized increase or decrease in the value in U.S. dollars of the net assets of the subsidiaries as of the date of the balance sheet, which will vary from period to period as exchange rates fluctuate. During the six months ended February 28, 2017, other comprehensive loss resulted primarily from approximately $1.6 million in comprehensive losses related to the translation adjustments related to assets and liabilities and the translation of the statement of income related to revenue, costs and expenses of our subsidiaries whose functional currency is not the U.S. dollar offset by comprehensive income of approximately $783,000 related to unrealized gains on changes in derivative obligations.

﻿

﻿

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

﻿

Financial Position and Cash Flow

﻿

﻿

We require cash to fund our operating expenses and working capital requirements, including investment s in merchandise inventories, acquisition of land and construction of new warehouse clubs and distribution centers, expansion of existing warehouse clubs and distribution centers, acquisitions of fixtures and equipment, routine upgrades and maintenance of fixtures and equipment within existing warehouse clubs, investments in joint ventures in Panama and Costa Rica to own and operate

42

Table of Contents

commercial retail centers located adjacent to the new warehouse clubs, the purchase of treasury stock upon the vesting of restricted stock awards and payment of dividends to stockholders. Our primary sources for funding these requirements are cash and cash equivalents on hand, cash generated from operations and bank borrowings. We evaluate on a regular basis whether we may need to borrow additional funds to cover any shortfall in our ability to generate sufficient cash from operations to meet our operating and capital requirements. As such, we may enter into or obtain additional loans and/or credit facilities to provide additional liquidity when necessary.

﻿

The following table summarizes the cash and cash equivalents held by our foreign subsidiaries and domestically (in thousands). Repatriation of cash and cash equivalents held by foreign subsidiaries may require us to accrue and pay taxes. We have no plans at this time to repatriate cash through the payment of cash dividends by our foreign subsidiaries to our domestic operations and, therefore, have not accrued taxes that would be due from repatriation.

﻿

﻿

﻿ |  |  |  |  |  |
﻿ |  |  |  |  |  |
﻿ |  | February 28, |  | August 31,
﻿ |  | 2017 |  | 2016
Cash and cash equivalents held by foreign subsidiaries |  | $ | 155,483 |  | $ | 160,053
Cash and cash equivalents held domestically |  |  | 26,507 |  |  | 39,469
Total cash and cash equivalents |  | $ | 181,990 |  | $ | 199,522

﻿

From time to time we have experienced a lack of availability of U.S. dollars in certain markets (U.S. dollar illiquidity). This impedes our ability to convert local currencies obtained through warehouse sales into U.S. dollars to settle the U.S. dollar liabilities associated with our imported products. In the second half of fiscal year 2016 and continuing into fiscal year 2017, we are experiencing this situation in Trinidad (“TT”). We are limited in our ability to convert TT dollars that we generate through sales of merchandise into U.S. dollars, which limits our ability to deploy that cash for corporate purposes. We will continue to seek to maximize the level of tradeable currency our Trinidad subsidiary can obtain (such as Euros and Canadian dollars) from our relationship banks. However, until such time that the uncertain state of tradable currency is resolved, we plan to take steps to limit our exposure. We began limiting our shipments of merchandise to Trinidad, starting in November 2016, from our distribution center in Miami to levels that generally align with our Trinidad subsidiary’s ability to pay for the merchandise in U.S. dollars. This reduced level of shipments adversely affected sales in the second quarter, particularly December, although less than our initial estimate of $8.0 million to $12.0 million. These actions did not impact the level of merchandise we obtain locally in Trinidad. Most recently, we have been able to improve our sourcing of tradeable currencies which has allowed for a more normalized flow of imported merchandise as we enter the third fiscal quarter. However, the illiquidity situation remains in that market, and we have not been able to fully address the level of dollar-denominated liabilities. Going forward, we could again find ourselves in a position that requires us to limit shipments from the U.S. to Trinidad in line with our ability to exchange TT dollars for tradeable currencies or to reduce our exposure to a potential devaluation. This may result in our Trinidad subsidiary running out of certain merchandise, from time to time during the remainder of the year, which could negatively impact sales in Trinidad.

﻿

Our cash flows are summarized as follows (in thousands):

﻿

﻿

﻿ |  |  |  |  |  |
﻿ |  |  |  |  |  |
﻿ |  | Six Months Ended
﻿ |  | February 28, |  | February 29,
﻿ |  | 2017 |  | 2016
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities |  | $ | 64,444 |  | $ | 69,580
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities |  |  | (87,139) |  |  | (32,242)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |  |  | 6,318 |  |  | (17,878)
Effect of exchange rates |  |  | (1,155) |  |  | (3,524)
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |  | $ | (17,532) |  | $ | 15,936

﻿

43

Table of Contents

Our net cash provided by (used in) operating activities for the six months ended February 28, 2017 and February 29, 2016 is summarized below:

﻿

﻿

﻿ |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
﻿ |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
﻿ |  | Six Months Ended |  | Increase/
﻿ |  | February 28, |  | February 29, |  | (Decrease)
﻿ |  | 2017 |  | 2016 |  | 2017 to 2016
Net income |  | $ | 52,088 |  | $ | 49,614 |  | $ | 2,474
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided from (used in) operating activities: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Depreciation and amortization |  |  | 22,562 |  |  | 18,732 |  |  | 3,830
(Gain) loss on sale of property and equipment |  |  | 742 |  |  | 65 |  |  | 677
Deferred income taxes |  |  | (1,412) |  |  | 16 |  |  | (1,428)
Stock-based compensation expenses |  |  | 4,965 |  |  | 4,020 |  |  | 945
Other non-cash operating activities |  |  | 7 |  |  | (375) |  |  | 382
Net non-cash related expenses |  | $ | 26,864 |  | $ | 22,458 |  | $ | 4,406
Net income from operating activities reconciled for non-cash operating activities |  |  | 78,952 |  |  | 72,072 |  |  | 6,880
Changes in operating assets and liabilities not including merchandise inventories |  |  | 386 |  |  | (3,824) |  |  | 4,210
Changes in merchandise inventories |  |  | (14,077) |  |  | 7,074 |  |  | (21,151)
Changes in accounts payable |  |  | (817) |  |  | (5,742) |  |  | 4,925
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities |  | $ | 64,444 |  | $ | 69,580 |  | $ | (5,136)

﻿

Net income from operating activities reconciled for non-cash operating activities increased approximately $6.9 million for the six-months ended February 28, 2017 over the same period last year. This was primarily a result of a year-on-year increase in net income of approximately $2.5 million and a year-on-year increase in depreciation expense of approximately $3.8 million due to new warehouse club construction and the continued ongoing capital improvements to existing warehouse clubs. These increases were partially offset by increases in deferred income taxes of approximately $1.4 million, primarily due to the reduction of taxable income in the U.S. as a result of the intercompany transaction between PriceSmart, Inc. and its Colombia subsidiary, which resulted in reduced utilization of U.S. deferred tax benefits. The increase in cash from operating activities reconciled for non-cash operating activities was offset by cash use related to operating activities for approximately $16.0 million. This was primarily related to increases in inventory due to the addition of a warehouse club opened during September 2016 in Chia, Colombia, increases in inventory for the preparation of the Easter holidays, and increase in inventory to support increased sales within the Company’s Colombia segment.

Our use of cash in investing activities for the six months ended February 28, 2017 and February 29, 2016 is summarized below:

﻿

﻿

﻿ |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
﻿ |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
﻿ |  | Six Months Ended |  | Increase/
﻿ |  | February 28, |  | February 29, |  | (Decrease)
﻿ |  | 2017 |  | 2016 |  | 2017 to 2016
Cash used for additions of property and equipment: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Land acquisitions |  | $ | 8,639 |  | $ | 1,148 |  | $ | 7,491
Deposits for land purchase option agreements |  |  | 300 |  |  | 75 |  |  | 225
Warehouse club and distribution center expansion, construction and land improvements |  |  | 58,947 |  |  | 21,001 |  |  | 37,946
Acquisition of fixtures and equipment |  |  | 19,434 |  |  | 10,028 |  |  | 9,406
Proceeds from disposals of property and equipment |  |  | (181) |  |  | (129) |  |  | (52)
Capital contribution to joint ventures |  |  | — |  |  | 119 |  |  | (119)
Net cash flows used by (provided in) investing activities |  | $ | 87,139 |  | $ | 32,242 |  | $ | 54,897

﻿

Net cash used in investing activities in creased in the first six months fiscal year 2017 compared to the first six months of fiscal year 2016 by approximately $54.9 million. This was primarily due to an increase i n cash expenditures for warehouse club expansions related to the acquisition of a distribution center in Medley, Miami-Dade County, Florida in January and construction activities of a warehouse club in Chia, C olombia that opened in October 2016. The Company also used cash for the acquisition of land in Costa Rica. An increase in overall warehouse club expansion activities, related to warehouse expansions in Guatemala, Honduras and El Salvador during the first six months of fiscal year 2017, also increased year-on-year investing activities.

﻿

44

Table of Contents

As of February 28, 2017, w e had commitments for capital expenditures for new warehouse club construction for approximately $8.2 million. We expect to spend approximately $70.0 million in other capital expenditures for ongoi ng replacement of equipment, building/leasehold improvements, expansion projects on existing warehouse clubs and land acquisitions during the remainder of fiscal year 2017. We entered into a lease extension during November 2016 for an existing lease within the Company’s Guatemala subsidiary for its Pradera location. The subsidiary signed an extension on Nov ember 24, 2016, extending the lease termination date from May 31, 2021 to November 30, 2043. The lease extension covers the real property at this location currently used by the Company plus additional square footage in the same shopping center, which has been added to the lease. This has effectively provided the Company with possession of substantially all of the real property available at that location. The Company plans to expand and upgrade the current warehouse club and parking areas and to improve access into and out from the location. The costs associated with this planned expansion and these improvements is included within our projected spend during the fiscal year. Future capital expenditures will be dependent on the timing of future land purchases and/or warehouse club construction activity.

﻿

We have entered into land purchase option agreements within our subsidiaries that have not been recorde d as a commitments, for which we have recorded deposits of approximately $785,000. The land purchase option agreements can generally be canceled at our sole option with the deposits being fully refundable up and until all permits are issued. However, the deposit on one piece of land totaling approximately $50,000 would be forfeited if one pending permit is not received and we were to decide not to proceed with the acquisition. We do not have a timetable of when or if we will exercise these land purchase options, due to the uncertainty related to the completion of our due diligence reviews. Our due diligence reviews include evaluations of the legal status of the property, the zoning and permitting issues related to acquiring approval for the construction and operation of a warehouse club and any other issues related to the property itself that could render the property unsuitable or limit the property's economic viability as a warehouse club site. If all of these purchase option agreements are exercised, the cash use for the acquisition of land would be approximately $24.5 million. We may enter into additional land purchase option agreements in the future.

﻿

In January 2017, the Company finalized its acquisition of a distribution center in Medley, Miami-Dade County, Florida, for a total purchase price of approximately $46.0 million. The Company will transfer the majority of its Miami distribution center activities located in its previously leased facilities. This should be completed by the end of the third quarter of fiscal year 2017. The Company intends to terminate leases with respect to portions of the existing leased Miami distribution facilities or enter into sublease agreements for portions of the leased facilities. The Company will record costs related to our ceasing to use the leased facilities as liabilities, with the related expenses as warehouse expenses, once the leased facility is available for subleasing.

﻿

Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities for the six months ended February 28, 2017 and February 29, 2016 is summarized below:

﻿

﻿

﻿ |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
﻿ |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
﻿ |  | Six Months Ended |  | Increase/
﻿ |  | February 28, |  | February 29, |  | (Decrease)
﻿ |  | 2017 |  | 2016 |  | 2017 to 2016
New bank loans offset by regularly scheduled payments on existing bank loans (loan activities) |  | $ | 18,458 |  | $ | (5,931) |  | $ | 24,389
Cash dividend payments |  |  | (10,641) |  |  | (10,629) |  |  | (12)
Proceeds from exercise of stock options and the tax benefit related to stock options |  |  | 442 |  |  | 638 |  |  | (196)
Purchase of treasury stock related to vesting of restricted stock |  |  | (1,941) |  |  | (1,956) |  |  | 15
Net cash provided by/(used in) financing activities |  | $ | 6,318 |  | $ | (17,878) |  | $ | 24,196

﻿

Net cash from long-term and short-term loan activities in creased approximately $24.4 million during the first six months of fiscal year 2017 over the first six months of fiscal year 2016. This increase in cash primarily resulted from the new loan for approximately $35.7 million related to the acquisition of the Miami distribution center, offset by regularly scheduled long-term loan payments of $7.2 million and a dditional net payments of approximately $10.0 million on short-term loans.

﻿

The following table summarizes the dividends declared and paid during fiscal year 2017 and 2016 (amounts are per share).

﻿

﻿

﻿ |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
﻿ |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
﻿ |  |  |  |  | First Payment |  | Second Payment
Declared |  | Amount |  | Record Date |  | Date Paid |  | Date Payable |  | Amount |  | Record Date |  | Date Paid |  | Date Payable |  | Amount
2/1/2017 |  | $ | 0.70 |  | 2/15/2017 |  | 2/28/2017 |  | N/A |  | $ | 0.35 |  | 8/15/2017 |  | N/A |  | 8/31/2017 |  | $ | 0.35
2/3/2016 |  | $ | 0.70 |  | 2/15/2016 |  | 2/29/2016 |  | N/A |  | $ | 0.35 |  | 8/15/2016 |  | 8/31/2016 |  | N/A |  | $ | 0.35

﻿

45

Table of Contents

We anticipate the ongoing payment of semi-annual dividends in subsequent periods, although the actual declaration of future dividends, the amount of such dividends, and the establishment of record and payment dates is subject to final determination by the Board of Directors at its discretion after its review of the Company’s financial performance and anticipated capital requirements.

﻿

Financing Activities

﻿

On January 27, 2017 the Company entered into a 10-year real estate secured loan with MUFG Union Bank, N.A. (“Union Bank”). The loan establishes a credit facility of up to 75% LTV of the acquired property at a variable interest rate of 30-day LIBOR plus 1.7% for a ten-year term, with monthly principal and interest payments, maturing i n 2027. An initial loa n amount of $35.7 million loan wa s funded on January 27, 2017. The Company entered into an interest rate hedge on November 7, 2016 with Union Bank for $35.7 million, the notional amount. The Company will receive variable 30-day LIB OR plus 1.7% and pay fixed (3.65%), with an effective date of March 1, 2017 and maturity date of March 1, 2027.

﻿

Derivatives

﻿

We are exposed to certain risks relating to our ongoing business operations. One risk managed by us using derivative instruments is interest rate risk. To manage interest rate exposure, we enter into hedging transactions (interest rate swaps) using derivative financial instruments. The objective of entering into interest rate swaps is to eliminate the variability of cash flows in the interest payments associated with variable-rate LIBOR loans over the life of the loans. As changes in interest rates impact the future cash flow of interest payments, the hedges provide a synthetic offset to interest rate movements.

﻿

In addition, we are exposed to foreign currency and interest rate cash flow exposure related to non-functional currency long-term debt of two of our wholly owned subsidiaries. To manage foreign currency and interest rate cash flow exposure, these subsidiaries enter into cross-currency interest rate swaps that convert their U.S. dollar denominated floating interest payments to functional currency fixed interest payments during the life of the hedging instrument. As changes in foreign exchange and interest rates impact the future cash flow of interest payments, the hedges are intended to offset changes in cash lows attributable to interest rate and foreign exchange movements.

﻿

We are also exposed to foreign-currency exchange-rate fluctuations on U.S. dollar denominated liabilities within our international subsidiaries whose functional currency is other than the U.S. dollar. We manage these fluctuations, in part, through the use of non-deliverable forward foreign-exchange contracts that are intended to offset changes in cash flow attributable to currency exchange movements. The contracts are intended primarily to economically address exposure to U.S. dollar merchandise inventory expenditures made by our international subsidiaries whose functional currency is other than the U.S. dollar. We seek to mitigate foreign-currency exchange-rate risk with the use of these contracts and do not intend to engage in speculative transactions. Currently, these contracts do not contain any credit-risk-related contingent features. These contracts do not qualify for derivative hedge accounting. The forward currency hedges are not effective cash flow hedges because the notional amount and maturity date of the forward contract does not coincide with the accounts payable balance and due dates. The hedge ineffectiveness is measured by use of the “hypothetical derivative method,” and we record the changes in the fair value of the forward contract related to the re-measurement of the payable at spot exchange rates as exchange rate gains or losses. The implied interest rate included within the forward contract is reflected in earnings as interest expense.

﻿

For derivative instruments that are designated and qualify as cash flow hedges, the effective portion of the gain or loss on the derivative is reported as a component of other comprehensive income (loss) and reclassified into earnings in the same period or periods during which the hedged transaction is determined to be ineffective. There were no such amounts for the periods reported herein.

﻿

46

Table of Contents

The following table summarizes agreements for which the Company has recorded cash flow hedge accounting transactions during the six months ended February 28, 2017:

﻿

﻿

﻿ |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
﻿ |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Subsidiary |  | Date Entered into |  | Derivative Financial Counter- party |  | Derivative Financial Instruments |  | Initial US$ Notional Amount |  | Bank US$ loan Held with |  | Floating Leg (swap counter-party) |  | Fixed Rate for PSMT Subsidiary |  | Settlement Dates |  | Effective Period of swap
PriceSmart, Inc (1) |  | 7-Nov-16 |  | MUFG Union Bank, N.A. ("Union Bank") |  | Interest rate swap |  | $ | 35,700,000 |  | Union Bank |  | Variable rate 1-month Libor plus 1.7% |  | 3.65 | % |  | 1st day of each month beginning on April 1, 2017 |  | March 1, 2017 - March 1, 2027
Costa Rica |  | 28-Aug-15 |  | Citibank, N.A. ("Citi") |  | Cross currency interest rate swap |  | $ | 7,500,000 |  | Citibank, N.A. |  | Variable rate 3-month Libor plus 2.50% |  | 7.65 | % |  | 28th day of August, November, February, and May beginning on November 30, 2015 |  | August 28, 2015 - August 28, 2020
Honduras |  | 24-Mar-15 |  | Citibank, N.A. ("Citi") |  | Cross currency interest rate swap |  | $ | 8,500,000 |  | Citibank, N.A. |  | Variable rate 3-month Libor plus 3.25% |  | 10.75 | % |  | 24th day of March, June, September, and December beginning on June 24, 2015 |  | March 24,2015 - March 20, 2020
El Salvador |  | 16-Dec-14 |  | Bank of Nova Scotia ("Scotiabank") |  | Interest rate swap |  | $ | 4,000,000 |  | Bank of Nova Scotia |  | Variable rate 30-day Libor plus 3.5% |  | 4.78 | % |  | 29th day of each month beginning on December 29, 2014 |  | December 1, 2014 - August 29, 2019
Colombia |  | 10-Dec-14 |  | Citibank, N.A. ("Citi") |  | Cross currency interest rate swap |  | $ | 15,000,000 |  | Citibank, N.A. |  | Variable rate 3-month Libor plus 2.8% |  | 8.25 | % |  | 4th day of March, June, Sept, Dec. beginning on March 4, 2015 |  | December 4, 2014 - December 3, 2019
Panama |  | 9-Dec-14 |  | Bank of Nova Scotia ("Scotiabank") |  | Interest rate swap |  | $ | 10,000,000 |  | Bank of Nova Scotia |  | Variable rate 30-day Libor plus 3.5% |  | 5.16 | % |  | 28th day of each month beginning December 29, 2014 |  | November 28, 2014 - November 29, 2019
Honduras |  | 23-Oct-14 |  | Citibank, N.A. ("Citi") |  | Cross currency interest rate swap |  | $ | 5,000,000 |  | Citibank, N.A. |  | Variable rate 3-month Libor plus 3.5% |  | 11.6 | % |  | 22nd day of January, April, July, and October beginning on January 22, 2015 |  | October 22, 2014 - October 22, 2017
Panama |  | 1-Aug-14 |  | Bank of Nova Scotia ("Scotiabank") |  | Interest rate swap |  | $ | 5,000,000 |  | Bank of Nova Scotia |  | Variable rate 30-day Libor plus 3.5% |  | 4.89 | % |  | 21st day of each month beginning on September 22, 2014 |  | August 21, 2014 - August 21, 2019
Panama |  | 22-May-14 |  | Bank of Nova Scotia ("Scotiabank") |  | Interest rate swap |  | $ | 19,800,000 |  | Bank of Nova Scotia |  | Variable rate 30-day Libor plus 3.5% |  | 4.98 | % |  | 4th day of each month beginning on June 4, 2014 |  | May 5, 2014 - April 4, 2019
Panama |  | 22-May-14 |  | Bank of Nova Scotia ("Scotiabank") |  | Interest rate swap |  | $ | 3,970,000 |  | Bank of Nova Scotia |  | Variable rate 30-day Libor plus 3.5% |  | 4.98 | % |  | 4th day of each month beginning on June 4, 2014 |  | May 5, 2014 - April 4, 2019

| (1) |  | The initial notional amount and fixed rate were modified effective January 2017.

﻿

We measure the fair value for all financial assets and liabilities that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a recurring basis during the reporting period. We have designated the interest rate swaps and cross-currency interest rate swap agreements as hedging instruments and have accounted for them under hedge accounting rules. Derivatives listed on the table below were designated as cash flow hedging instruments. The following table summarizes the effect of the fair value of interest rate swap and cross-currency interest rate swap derivative instruments that qualify for derivative hedge accounting and its associated tax effect on accumulated other comprehensive (income) / loss (in thousands):

﻿

﻿

﻿ |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
﻿ |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
﻿ |  |  |  | February 28, 2017 |  | August 31, 2016
Derivatives designated as cash flow hedging instruments |  | Balance Sheet Location |  | Fair Value |  | Net Tax Effect |  | Net OCI |  | Fair Value |  | Net Tax Effect |  | Net OCI
Cross-currency interest rate swaps |  | Other non-current assets |  | $ | 2,719 |  |  | (987) |  |  | 1,732 |  | $ | 3,224 |  | $ | (1,248) |  | $ | 1,976
Interest rate swaps |  | Other non-current assets |  |  | 613 |  |  | (220) |  |  | 393 |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | —
Interest rate swaps |  | Other long-term liabilities |  |  | (69) |  |  | 19 |  |  | (50) |  |  | (448) |  |  | 115 |  |  | (333)
Cross-currency interest rate swaps |  | Other long-term liabilities |  |  | (596) |  |  | 179 |  |  | (417) |  |  | (1,066) |  |  | 320 |  |  | (746)
Net fair value of derivatives designated as hedging instruments |  |  |  | $ | 2,667 |  | $ | (1,009) |  | $ | 1,658 |  | $ | 1,710 |  | $ | (813) |  | $ | 897

﻿

﻿

From time to time, we enter into non-deliverable forward exchange contracts. These contracts are treated for accounting purposes as fair value contracts and do not qualify for derivative hedge accounting.

﻿

47

Table of Contents

The following table summarizes these agreements as of February 28, 2017:

﻿

﻿

﻿ |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
﻿ |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Subsidiary |  | Dates entered into |  | Financial Derivative (Counterparty) |  | Derivative Financial Instrument |  | Notional Amount (in thousands) |  | Settlement Date |  | Effective Period of Forward
Costa Rica |  | 31-Aug-16 |  | Citibank, N.A. |  | Forward foreign exchange contracts |  | $ | 3,750 |  | August 30, 2017 |  | August 31, 2016- August 30, 2017

﻿

The following table summarizes the fair value of foreign currency forward contracts that do not qualify for derivative hedge accounting (in thousands):

﻿

﻿

﻿ |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
﻿ |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
﻿ |  | February 28, 2017 |  | August 31, 2016 |
Non-deliverable forward foreign exchange contracts |  | Balance Sheet Location |  | Fair Value |  | Balance Sheet Location |  | Fair Value |
Foreign currency forward contracts |  | Other accrued expenses |  | $ | (87) |  | Other accrued expenses |  | $ | (110) |
Net fair value of non-deliverable forward foreign exchange contracts designated as hedging instruments that do not qualify for hedge accounting |  |  |  | $ | (87) |  |  |  | $ | (110) |

﻿

| (1) |  | Th e fair value of these financial assets and liabilities measured and recorded using Level 2 inputs, which are inputs other than quoted prices in active markets that are either directly or indirectly observable.

﻿

﻿

Short-Term Borrowings and Long-Term Debt

﻿

Short-term borrowings consist of lines of credit which are secured by certain assets of the Company and its subsidiaries and which in some cases are guaranteed by the Company. The following table summarizes the balances of total facilities, facilities used and facilities available (in thousands):

﻿

﻿ |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
﻿ |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
﻿ |  |  |  |  | Facilities Used |  |  |  |  |  |
﻿ |  | Total Amount |  | Short-term |  | Letters of |  | Facilities |  | Weighted average |
﻿ |  | of Facilities |  | Borrowings |  | Credit |  | Available |  | interest rate |
February 28, 2017 |  | $ | 69,000 |  | $ | 6,561 |  | $ | — |  | $ | 62,439 |  | 10.1 | %
August 31, 2016 |  | $ | 65,000 |  | $ | 16,534 |  | $ | 9,224 |  | $ | 39,242 |  | 10.1 | %

﻿

As of February 28, 2017 and August 31, 2016, the Company had approximately $40.0 million of short-term facilities in the U.S. that require compliance with certain quarterly financial covenants. As of February 28, 2017 and August 31, 2016, the Company was in compliance with respect to these covenants. E ach of the facilities expires annually and is normally renewed.

﻿

The following table provides the changes in our long-term debt for the six months ended February 28, 2017:

﻿

﻿

﻿ |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
﻿ |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
(Amounts in thousands) |  | Current portion of long-term debt |  | Long-term debt (net of current portion) |  | Total |
Balances as of August 31, 2016 |  | $ | 14,565 |  | $ | 73,542 |  | $ | 88,107 | (1)
Proceeds from long-term debt incurred during the period: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
MFUG Union Bank |  |  | — |  |  | 35,700 |  |  | 35,700 |
Repayments of long-term debt: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Regularly scheduled loan payments |  |  | — |  |  | (7,231) |  |  | (7,231) |
Translation adjustments on foreign-currency debt of subsidiaries whose functional currency is not the U.S. dollar (2) |  |  | 58 |  |  | (69) |  |  | (11) |
Balances as of February 28, 2017 |  | $ | 14,623 |  | $ | 101,942 |  | $ | 116,565 | (3)

﻿

| (1) |  | The carrying amount of non-cash assets assigned as collateral for these loans was $102.4 million. No cash assets were assigned as collateral for these loans.

| (2) |  | These foreign currency translation adjustments are recorded within Other comprehensive income.

| (3) |  | The carrying amount of non-cash assets assigned as collateral for these loans was $141.8 million. No cash assets were assigned as collateral for these loans.

﻿

48

Table of Contents

As of February 28, 2017, the Company had approximately $105.3 million of long-term loans in the U.S., Trinidad, Panama, El Salvador, Honduras, Costa Rica, Barbados and Colombia that require compliance with certain annual or quarterly financial covenants, which include debt service and leverage ratios. As of February 28, 2017, the Company was in compliance with all covenants or amended covenants.

﻿

As of August 31, 2016, the Company had approximately $76.0 million of long-term loans in Trinidad, Panama, El Salvador, Honduras, Costa Rica, Barbados and Colombia that require these subsidiaries to comply with certain annual or quarterly financial covenants, which include debt service and leverage ratios. As of August 31, 2016, the Company was in compliance with all covenants or amended covenants.

﻿

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

﻿

The Company does not have any off-balance sheet arrangements that have had, or are reasonably likely to have, a material current or future effect on its financial condition or consolidated financial statements.

﻿

Repurchase of Equity Securities and Reissuance of Treasury Shares

﻿

At the vesting dates for restricted stock awards to our employees, we repurchase a portion of the shares that have vested at the prior day's closing price per share, with the funds used to pay the employees' minimum statutory tax withholding requirements related to the vesting of restricted stock awards. We do not have a stock repurchase program.

﻿

Shares of common stock repurchased by us are recorded at cost as treasury stock and result in the reduction of stockholders’ equity in our Consolidated Balance Sheets. We may reissue these treasury shares. When treasury shares are reissued, we use the first in/first out (“FIFO”) cost method for determining cost of the reissued shares. If the issuance price is higher than the cost, the excess of the issuance price over the cost is credited to additional paid-in capital (“APIC”). If the issuance price is lower than the cost, the difference is first charged against any credit balance in APIC from treasury stock and the balance is charged to retained earnings.

﻿

At the vesting dates of restricted stock awards, the Company repurchases shares at the prior day’s closing price per share, with the funds used to pay the employees’ minimum statutory tax withholding requirements. The Company expects to continue this practice going forward. The Company did not repurchase any shares during the first three months of fiscal years 2017 and 2016.

﻿

﻿

﻿ |  |  |  |  |  |
﻿ |  |  |  |  |  |
﻿ |  | Six Months Ended
﻿ |  | February 28, |  | February 29,
﻿ |  | 2017 |  | 2016
Shares repurchased |  |  | 23,391 |  |  | 26,637
Cost of repurchase of shares (in thousands) |  | $ | 1,941 |  | $ | 1,956

﻿

We have reissued treasury shares as part of our stock-based compensation programs. However, we did not reissue any treasury shares during the first six months of fiscal years 2017 and 2016.

Critical Accounting Estimates

﻿

The preparation of our consolidated financial statements requires that management make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Some of our accounting policies require management to make difficult and subjective judgments, often as a result of the need to make estimates of matters that are inherently uncertain. Management continues to review its accounting policies and evaluate its estimates, including those related to contingencies and litigation, income taxes, value added taxes, and long-lived assets. We base our estimates on historical experience and on other assumptions that management believes to be reasonable under the present circumstances. Using different estimates could have a material impact on our financial condition and results of operations.

﻿

Contingencies and Litigation: In the ordinary course of business, we are periodically named as a defendant in various lawsuits, claims and pending actions and are exposed to tax risks (other than income tax). The principal risks that we insure against are workers’ compensation, general liability, vehicle liability, property damage, employment practices, errors and omissions, fiduciary liability and fidelity losses. If a potential loss arising from these lawsuits, claims, actions and non-income tax issues is probable and reasonably estimable, we record the estimated liability based on circumstances and assumptions existing at the time. The estimates affecting our litigation reserves can be affected by new claims filed after the balance sheet date with respect to events occurring prior to the balance sheet date and developments in pending litigation that may affect the outcome of the litigation. While we believe the recorded liabilities are adequate, there are inherent limitations in projecting the outcome of

49

Table of Contents

litigation and in evaluating the probable additional tax associated with various non-income tax filing positions. As such, we are unable to make a reasonable estimate of the sensitivity to change of estimates affecting our recorded liabilities. As additional information becomes available, we assess the potential liability and revise our estimates as appropriate.

﻿

Income Taxes: We account for income taxes using the asset and liability method. Under the asset and liability method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences and carry-forwards are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. A valuation allowance is established when necessary to reduce deferred tax assets to amounts expected to be realized. As of February 28, 2017, we evaluated our deferred tax assets and liabilities and determined that a valuation allowance was necessary for certain foreign deferred tax asset balances, primarily because of the existence of significant negative objective evidence, such as the fact that certain subsidiaries are in a cumulative loss position for the past three years, indicating that certain net operating loss carry-forward periods are not sufficient to realize the related deferred tax assets.

﻿

We and our subsidiaries are required to file federal and state income tax returns in the United States and various other tax returns in foreign jurisdictions. The preparation of these tax returns requires us to interpret the applicable tax laws and regulations in effect in such jurisdictions, which could affect the amount of tax we pay. In consultation with our tax advisors, we base our tax returns on interpretations that we believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. The tax returns, however, are subject to routine reviews by the various federal, state and foreign taxing authorities in the jurisdictions in which we or one of our subsidiaries file tax returns. As part of these reviews, a taxing authority may disagree with respect to the income tax positions we have taken (“uncertain tax positions”) and, therefore, require us or one of our subsidiaries to pay additional taxes.

﻿

We accrue an amount for our estimate of probable additional income tax liability. In certain cases, the impact of an uncertain income tax position on the income tax return must be recognized at the largest amount that is more likely than not to be sustained upon audit by the relevant tax authority. An uncertain income tax position will not be recognized if it has less than 50% likelihood of being sustained. This requires significant judgment, the use of estimates, and the interpretation and application of complex tax laws. When facts and circumstances change, we reassess these probabilities and record any changes in the consolidated financial statements as appropriate. There were no material changes in our uncertain income tax positions for the periods ended on February 28, 2017 and August 31, 2016. During the first quarter of fiscal year 2015, one of the Company’s subsidiaries received assessments claiming $2.5 million of taxes, penalties and interest related to withholding taxes on certain charges for services rendered by the Company. In addition, this subsidiary received assessments totaling $5.1 million for lack of deductibility of the underlying service charges due to the lack of withholding. Based on the Company's interpretation of local law, rulings and jurisprudence (including Supreme Court precedents with respect to the deductibility assessment), the Company expects to prevail in both instances and has not recorded a provision for these assessments.

﻿

We have not provided for U.S. deferred taxes on cumulative non-U.S. undistributed earnings as we deem such earnings to be indefinitely reinvested. It is not practicable to determine the U.S. federal income tax liability that would be associated with the repatriation earnings because of the complexity of the computation.

﻿

Tax Receivables: We pay Value Added Tax (“VAT”) or similar taxes (“input VAT”), income taxes, and other taxes within the normal course of our business in most of the countries in which we operate related to the procurement of merchandise and/or services we acquires and/or on sales and taxable income. We also collect VAT or similar taxes on behalf of the government (“output VAT”) for merchandise and/or services we sell. If the output VAT exceeds the input VAT, then the difference is remitted to the government, usually on a monthly basis. If the input VAT exceeds the output VAT, this creates a VAT receivable. In most countries where we operate, the governments have implemented additional collection procedures, such as requiring credit and debit card processors to remit a portion of sales processed via credit and debit card directly to the government as advance payments of VAT and/or income tax. In the case of VAT, these procedures alter the natural offset of input and output VAT and generally leave us with a net VAT receivable, forcing us to process significant refund claims on a recurring basis. With respect to income taxes paid, if the estimated income taxes paid or withheld exceed the actual income tax due this creates an income tax receivable. We either request a refund of these tax receivables or apply the balance to expected future tax payments. These refund or offset processes can take anywhere from several months to several years to complete.

﻿

In most countries where we operate, the tax refund process is defined and structured with regular refunds or offsets. However, in three countries there is either not a clearly defined process or the governments have alleged there is not a clearly defined process to allow the authorities to refund VAT receivables. We, together with our tax and legal advisers, are currently appealing these interpretations in court and expect to prevail. In one of these countries, where there is favorable jurisprudence, the government performed an audit to verify the amount of the respective VAT receivables as a required precursor to any refund. The balance of the VAT receivable in these countries was $8.7 million and $7.6 million as of February 28, 2017 and August 31, 2016, respectively. In another country in which the Company has warehouse clubs, beginning in fiscal year 2015, a new minimum income tax mechanism took effect, which requires us to pay taxes based on a percentage of sales rather than income. As a result,

50

Table of Contents

we are making income tax payments substantially in excess of those we would expect to pay based on taxable income. The current rules (which we have challenged in court) do not clearly allow us to obtain a refund or offset this excess income tax against other taxes. As of February 28, 2017, the Company had deferred tax assets of approximately $2.0 million in this country. Also, the Company had an income tax receivable balance of $3.5 million as of February 28, 2017, related to excess payments from fiscal year 2015, 2016 and 2017. We have not placed any type of allowance on the recoverability of these tax receivables or deferred tax assets because we believe that it is more likely than not that we will ultimately succeed in our refund requests, related appeals and/or court challenge on this matter.

﻿

Our policy for classification and presentation of VAT receivables, income tax receivables and other tax receivables is as follows:

﻿

| · |  | Short-term VAT and Income tax receivables, recorded as Other current assets: This classification is used for any countries where our subsidiary has generally demonstrated the ability to recover the VAT or income tax receivable within one year. We also classify as short-term any approved refunds or credit notes to the extent that we expect to receive the refund or use the credit notes within one year.

﻿

| · |  | Long-term VAT and Income tax receivables, recorded as Other non-current assets: This classification is used for amounts not approved for refund or credit in countries where our subsidiary has not demonstrated the ability to obtain refunds within one year and/or for amounts which are subject to outstanding disputes. An allowance is provided against VAT and income tax receivable balances in dispute when we do not expect to eventually prevail in its recovery.

﻿

Long-lived Assets: We periodically evaluate our long-lived assets for indicators of impairment. Some of the key i ndicators that an asset may be impaired are:

﻿

| · |  | the asset's inability to continue to generate income from operations and positive cash flow in future periods;

| · |  | loss of legal ownership or title to the asset;

| · |  | significant changes in its strategic business objectives and utilization of the asset(s); and

| · |  | the impact of significant negative industry or economic trends.

﻿

Management's judgments are based on market and operational conditions at the time of the evaluation and can include management's best estimate of future business activity, which in turn drives estimates of future cash flows from these assets. These periodic evaluations could cause management to conclude that impairment factors exist, requiring an adjustment of these assets to their then-current fair market value. Loss/(gain) on disposal of assets recorded during the years reported resulted from improvements to operations and normal preventive maintenance.

﻿

Seasonality

﻿

Historically, our merchandising businesses have experienced holiday retail seasonality in their markets. In addition to seasonal fluctuations, our operating results fluctuate quarter-to-quarter as a result of economic and political events in markets that we serve, the timing of holidays, weather, the timing of shipments, product mix, and currency effects on the cost of U.S.-sourced products which may make these products more or less expensive in local currencies and therefore more or less affordable. Because of such fluctuations, the results of operations of any quarter are not indicative of the results that may be achieved for a full fiscal year or any future quarter. In addition, there can be no assurance that our future results will be consistent with past results or the projections of securities analysts.

ITE M 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

﻿

Market risks relating to our operations result primarily from changes in interest rates and changes in currency exchange rates. There have been no material changes in our market risk factors at February 28, 2017 compared to those disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2016. The gross fair value of our derivative financial instruments designated as cash flow hedges has increased by $1.0 million since August 31, 2016, primarily due to the addition of an interest rate swap related to a $35.7 million loan entered by the Company, fluctuation in exchange rates for the currencies that are being hedged and changes in the scheduled maturities of the underlying instruments during the six months ended February 28, 2017. Movements in currency exchange rates and the related impact on the translation of the balance sheets of the Company's subsidiaries whose functional currency is not the U.S. dollar were the primary cause of the $1.6 million net loss for the six months ended February 28, 2017 in the foreign currency translation adjustments category of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss).

﻿

In addition, the Company's subsidiaries whose functional currency is not the U.S. dollar carry monetary assets and liabilities denominated in currencies other than the functional currency of the respective entity (primarily U.S. dollars) are revalued to the functional currency using the exchange rate on the balance sheet date. These foreign exchange transaction gains

51

Table of Contents

(losses), including transactions recorded involving these monetary assets and liabilities, are recorded as currency gain (loss) within Other income (expense) in the consolidated statements of income.

﻿

The following table summarizes the amounts recorded for the three and six month periods ending February 28, 2017 and February 29, 2016 (in thousands):

﻿

﻿

﻿ |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
﻿ |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
﻿ |  | Three Months Ended |  | Six Months Ended
﻿ |  | February 28, |  | February 29, |  | February 28, |  | February 29,
﻿ |  | 2017 |  | 2016 |  | 2017 |  | 2016
Currency gain (loss) |  | $ | 915 |  | $ | (552) |  | $ | (13) |  | $ | (796)

From time to time we have experienced a lack of availability of U.S. dollars in certain markets (U.S. dollar illiquidity). This impedes our ability to convert local currencies obtained through warehouse sales into U.S. dollars to settle the U.S. dollar liabilities associated with our imported products. In the second half of fiscal year 2016 and continuing into fiscal year 2017, we are experiencing this situation in Trinidad (“TT”). We are limited in our ability to convert TT dollars that we generate through sales of merchandise into U.S. dollars to settle U.S. dollar liabilities, increasing our foreign exchange exposure to any devaluation of the TT dollar. The June 2016 International Monetary Fund Country Report for Trinidad and Tobago suggests that the TT dollar could be overvalued, in the range of 20%-50% compared to the U.S. dollar. Until such time that the uncertain state of tradable currency is resolved, we plan to take steps to limit our exposure. We have reduced new shipments of merchandise to Trinidad from our distribution center in Miami to levels that generally align with our Trinidad subsidiary’s ability to pay for the merchandise in U.S. dollars. This reduced level of shipments had some negative affect on sales in the second quarter, particularly December, although less than our initial estimate of $8.0 million to $12.0 million. These actions did not impact the level of merchandise we obtain locally in Trinidad. Most recently we have been able to improve our sourcing of tradeable currencies, which has allowed for a more normalized flow of imported merchandise as we enter the third fiscal quarter. However, the illiquidity situation remains in that market and we have not been able to fully address the level of dollar-denominated liabilities. Going forward, we could again find ourselves in a position that requires us to limit shipments from the U.S. to Trinidad in line with our ability to exchange TT dollars for tradeable currencies or to reduce our exposure to a potential devaluation. This may result in our Trinidad subsidiary running out of certain merchandise, from time to time during the remainder of the year, which could negatively impact sales in Trinidad. As of February 28, 2017, we have net U.S. dollar denominated liabilities of approximately $16.0 mi llion that would be exposed to a potential devaluation of Trinidad dollars. If for example, a hypothetical 20% devaluation of the TT currency occurred, the net effect on other expense would be approximately $3.2 million.

52

Table of Contents

ITE M 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

﻿

We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in our Exchange Act reports is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the timelines specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decision regarding required disclosure. In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, management recognized that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can only provide reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, and in reaching a reasonable level of assurance, management necessarily was required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures. Also, we have investments in certain unconsolidated entities. Because we do not control or manage those entities, our control procedures with respect to those entities were substantially more limited than those we maintain with respect to our consolidated subsidiaries.

﻿

As required by SEC Rules 13a-15(e) or 15d-15(e), we carried out an evaluation as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures. Based upon their evaluation, the Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective at the reasonable assurance level.

﻿

In the ordinary course of business, we review our system of internal control over financial reporting and make changes to our systems and processes to improve controls and increase efficiency, while ensuring that we maintain an effective internal control environment. Changes may include such activities as implementing new, more efficient systems and automating manual processes. There has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) or 15d-15(f) of the Exchange Act) during our most recently completed fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

﻿

The certifications required by Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 are filed as Exhibit 31.1 and 31.2 to this report.

﻿

53

Table of Contents

PA RT II—OTHER INFORMATION

﻿

ITE M 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

﻿

None.

﻿

IT EM 1A. RISK FACTORS

﻿

In addition to the other information set forth in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, the reader should carefully consider the factors discussed in Part I, “Item 1A. Risk Factors” in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended August 31, 2016. There have been no material changes in the Company's risk factors from those disclosed in Part I, Item 1A of the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2016.

﻿

Available Information

﻿

The PriceSmart, Inc. website or internet address is www.pricesmart.com. On this website the Company makes available, free of charge, its annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and any amendments to those reports, and the annual report to the security holders as soon as reasonably practicable after electronically filing such material with or furnishing it to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The Company’s SEC reports can be accessed through the investor relations section of its website under “SEC Filings.” All of the Company’s filings with the SEC may also be obtained at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at Room 1580, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549. For information regarding the operation of the SEC’s Public Reference Room, please contact the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. Additionally, the SEC maintains an internet site that contains reports, proxy and information statements and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC at www.sec.gov. The Company made available its annual report on Form 10-K and its annual Proxy Statement for the fiscal year 2016 at the internet address http://materials.proxyvote.com/741511.

﻿

﻿

IT EM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

﻿

(a) None.

﻿

(b) None.

﻿

(c) Purchase of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers.

﻿

Upon vesting of restricted stock awarded by the Company to employees, the Company repurchases shares and withholds the amount of the repurchase payment to cover employees’ tax withholding obligations. As set forth in the table below, during the quarter ended February 28, 2017, the Company repurchased a total of 23,391 shares in the indicated months. These were the only repurchases of equity securities made by the Company during fiscal year 2017. The Company does not have a stock repurchase program.

﻿

﻿

﻿ |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
﻿ |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Period |  | (a) Total Number of Shares Purchased |  | (b) Average Price Paid Per Share |  | (c) Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs |  | (d) Maximum Number of Shares That May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs
December 1, 2016 - December 31, 2016 |  |  | — |  | $ | — |  |  | — |  |  | N/A
January 1, 2017 - January 31, 2017 |  |  | 23,283 |  | $ | 82.96 |  |  | — |  |  | N/A
February 1, 2017 - February 28, 2017 |  |  | 108 |  | $ | 84.70 |  |  | — |  |  | N/A
Total |  |  | 23,391 |  | $ | 82.97 |  |  | — |  |  | —

﻿

﻿

﻿

54

Table of Contents

IT EM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES

﻿

None.

﻿

IT EM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

﻿

Not applicable.

﻿

IT EM 5. OTHER INFORMATION

﻿

None.

55

Table of Contents

IT EM 6. EXHIBITS

﻿

(a) Exhibits:

﻿ |
3.1(1) | Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company.
3.2(2) | Certificate of Amendment of Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company.
3.3(3) | Certificate of Amendment of Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company.
3.4(1) | Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Company.
10.1 | Loan between PriceSmart, Inc. and MUFG UNION BANK, N.A., for US $35.7 million, dated January 27, 2017
31.1 | Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
31.2 | Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.1** | Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.2** | Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

﻿

﻿

﻿ |
* | Identifies management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.

﻿

﻿

﻿ |
** | These certifications are being furnished solely to accompany this Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, and are not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and are not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of PriceSmart, Inc., whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.

﻿

| (1) |  | Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended August 31, 1997 filed with the Commission on November 26, 1997.

| (2) |  | Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended February 29, 2004 filed with the Commission on April 14, 2004.

| (3) |  | Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended August 31, 2004 filed with the Commission on November 24, 2004.

﻿

﻿

56

Table of Contents

SIG NATURES

﻿

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

﻿

﻿

﻿

﻿ |  |  |  |
﻿ |  |  |  |
﻿ |  |  | PRICESMART, INC.
﻿ |  |  |  |
Date: | April 6, 2017 |  | By: | /s/ JOSE LUIS LAPARTE
﻿ |  |  |  | Jose Luis Laparte
﻿ |  |  |  | Director, Chief Executive Officer and President
﻿ |  |  |  | (Principal Executive Officer)
﻿ |  |  |  |
Date: | April 6, 2017 |  | By: | /s/ JOHN M. HEFFNER
﻿ |  |  |  | John M. Heffner
﻿ |  |  |  | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
﻿ |  |  |  | (Principal Financial Officer and
﻿ |  |  |  | Principal Accounting Officer)
﻿ |  |  |  |

﻿

57