Commitments and Contingencies	6 Months Ended
Commitments and Contingencies	Jun. 30, 2025
Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract]
Commitments and Contingencies	(12) Commitments and Contingencies In the ordinary course of business, the Company may become party to lawsuits, administrative proceedings, and governmental investigations, including environmental, regulatory, and other matters. The outcome of these matters cannot always be predicted accurately, but the Company accrues liabilities for these matters if the Company has determined that it is probable a loss has been incurred and the loss can be reasonably estimated. While there have been no material changes in the Company’s commitments and contingencies from those disclosed in the 2024 Form 10-K, recent developments are discussed below. Crude Oil Supply Agreement The Petroleum Segment has a crude oil supply agreement with Gunvor USA LLC (“Gunvor”), which commenced on January 1, 2024 (as amended, the “Gunvor Crude Oil Supply Agreement”), pursuant to which Gunvor supplies the Petroleum Segment with certain crude oil and intermediation logistics helping to reduce the amount of inventory held at certain locations and mitigate crude oil pricing risk. Volumes contracted under this agreement, as a percentage of the total crude oil purchases (in barrels), were approximately 13% and 20% for the three months ended June 30, 2025 and 2024, respectively, and 9% and 21% for the six months ended June 30, 2025 and 2024, respectively. On July 29, 2025, the Gunvor Crude Oil Supply Agreement was amended to update certain commercial terms and extend its term through January 31, 2029, which is subject to two successive automatic one-year renewals following the expiration of the amended term in the absence of 180 days’ notice of termination. 45Q Transaction Under the agreements entered into in connection with the 45Q Transaction, the Company’s indirect subsidiary, Coffeyville Resources Nitrogen Fertilizer, LLC (“CRNF”), is obligated to meet certain minimum quantities of carbon oxide supply each year during the term of the agreement and is subject to fees of up to $15 million per year (reduced pro rata for partial years) to the unaffiliated third-party investors, subject to an overall $45 million cap, if these minimum quantities are not delivered. CVR Partners issued a guarantee to the unaffiliated third-party investors and certain of their affiliates involved in the 45Q Transaction of the payment and performance obligations of CRNF and CVR-CapturePoint Parent, LLC (“CVRP JV”), which include the aforementioned fees. This guarantee has no impacts on the accounting records of CVR Partners unless the parties fail to comply with the terms of the 45Q Transaction contracts. Renewable Fuel Standard Coffeyville Resources Refining & Marketing, LLC (“CRRM”) and Wynnewood Refining Company, LLC (“WRC”, and together with CRRM, the “obligated-party subsidiaries”) are subject to the RFS implemented by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (the “EPA”), which, absent any exemption or waiver, requires obligated parties to blend a certain amount of renewable fuels, called a Renewable Volume Obligation (“RVO”), into their transportation fuels or purchase RINs, in lieu of blending. The Petroleum Segment’s obligated-party subsidiaries are not able to blend the majority of their transportation fuels with renewable fuels and, unless their RFS obligations are waived or exempted, must either purchase RINs from third parties including its affiliate or obtain waiver credits for cellulosic biofuels in order to comply with the RFS. The Company’s obligated-party subsidiaries recognized, net of RIN sales, an expense of $123 million and an expense of $30 million for the three months ended June 30, 2025 and 2024, respectively, and an expense of $246 million and a benefit of $21 million for the six months ended June 30, 2025 and 2024, respectively, for their compliance with the RFS (based on the 2020 through 2025 renewable volume obligation (“RVO”), for the respective periods, excluding the impacts of any exemptions or waivers to which the Company’s obligated-party subsidiaries may be entitled). The costs to comply with the RFS obligation through purchasing of RINs not otherwise reduced by blending of ethanol, biodiesel, or renewable diesel are included within Cost of materials and other in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations. At each reporting period, to the extent RINs purchased and generated through blending are less than the RFS obligation (excluding the impact of exemptions or waivers to which the Company may be entitled), the remaining position is valued using RIN market prices at period end for each specific or closest vintage year. As of June 30, 2025 and December 31, 2024, the Company’s obligated-party subsidiaries’ RFS positions were approximately $548 million and $323 million, respectively, and are recorded in Other current liabilities in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. Litigation Renewable Fuel Standard – In June 2025, the Supreme Court of the United States (“SCOTUS”) held that venue for the challenges filed by WRC and other small refineries to the EPA’s denials (the “2022 Denials”) of certain petitions for small refinery hardship exemptions under the RFS lies exclusively in the United States Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit (“D.C. Circuit”). This ruling vacated the November 2023 opinion of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit that had vacated the 2022 Denials as to WRC and its co-petitioners and remanded for further proceedings. We expect WRC’s and its co-petitioners’ challenges will be transferred to the D.C. Circuit. Upon transfer, we expect that the EPA’s denials of these petitions will once again be vacated in accordance with the July 2024 decision of the D.C. Circuit, in which that court (like the Fifth Circuit) vacated and remanded the 2022 Denials to the EPA, finding them to be contrary to law and arbitrary and capricious. We similarly expect that WRC’s and its co-petitioners’ challenges to the EPA’s separate 2023 denials (the “2023 Denials”) of additional petitions for small refinery hardship exemptions will be vacated consistent with the D.C. Circuit’s July 2024 decision, because the 2023 Denials were based on the same methodology as the 2022 Denials. WRC also filed a challenge in the Fifth Circuit to the EPA’s denial of a single exemption petition in early January 2025. This case currently is held in abeyance to allow the EPA to brief the current administration about the case and determine whether to revise the underlying denial of WRC’s exemption petition. Also in June 2025, the D.C. Circuit issued a decision remanding the EPA’s renewable volume obligations for 2023 to 2025 (“Set Rule”) to the EPA without vacatur based on specific grounds raised by environmental petitioners, while rejecting all other challenges, including those raised by refiners. Additionally, the EPA issued its proposed renewable volume obligations for 2026 and 2027 (“Set 2 Rule”). Public comment on the proposal is due in August 2025. In July 2025, the EPA’s partial waiver of the 2024 cellulosic biofuel volume requirement was published in the Federal Register, making the 2024 RFS compliance reporting deadline for all obligated parties December 1, 2025. Also in July 2025, WRC submitted its petition for the 2025 compliance period, ruling on which is due in October 2025. As these matters are in various stages, the Company cannot yet determine at this time the outcomes of these matters. While we intend to prosecute these actions vigorously, if these matters are ultimately concluded in a manner adverse to WRC, they could have a material effect on the Company’s financial position, results of operations, or cash flows. Guaranty Dispute – In May 2025, a subsidiary of CVR Energy entered into a stipulation with Exxon Mobil Corporation (“XOM”) in connection with the lawsuit it filed in the Superior Court of the State of Delaware disputing the validity of an alleged guaranty claimed by XOM to have been issued in its favor in 1993 extending all deadlines under the litigation until late July 2025. As this matter remains in its early stages, the Company cannot yet determine whether its outcome will have a material adverse impact on the Company’s financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.