XML 73 R53.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.8.0.1
CURRENT AND NON-CURRENT PROVISIONS (Tables)
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2017
CURRENT AND NON-CURRENT PROVISIONS  
Schedule of composition of provisions

Description

 

12.31.2017

 

12.31.2016

 

 

 

ThCh$

 

ThCh$

 

Litigation (1)

 

65,624,166

 

73,081,893

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

 

65,624,166

 

73,081,893

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1)

Corresponds to the provision for probable fiscal, labor and trade contingency losses based on the opinion of our legal advisors, detailed as follows:

 

Detail (see note 21.1)

 

12.31.2017

 

12.31.2016

 

 

 

ThCh$

 

ThCh$

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tax Contingencies

 

49,185,234

 

63,543,782

 

Labor Contingencies

 

10,468,704

 

7,940,428

 

Civil Contingencies

 

5,970,228

 

1,597,683

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

 

65,624,166

 

73,081,893

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Schedule of movement of provisions

 

 

12.31.2017

 

12.31.2016

 

Description

 

Litigation

 

Others

 

Total 

 

Litigation

 

Others

 

Total 

 

 

 

ThCh$

 

ThCh$

 

ThCh$

 

ThCh$

 

ThCh$

 

ThCh$

 

Opening Balance as of January 01

 

73,081,893

 

 

73,081,893

 

64,301,817

 

 

64,301,817

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Additional provisions

 

2,493,968

 

 

2,493,968

 

1,047,308

 

 

1,047,308

 

Increase (decrease) in existing provisions

 

(19,083,499

)

 

(19,083,499

)

(1,519,800

)

 

(1,519,800

)

Payments

 

22,985,793

 

 

22,985,793

 

4,276,851

 

 

4,276,851

 

Reverse unused provision (*)

 

(6,769,384

)

 

(6,769,384

)

(2,774,703

)

 

(2,774,703

)

Increase (decrease) due to foreign exchange differences

 

(7,084,605

)

 

(7,084,605

)

7,750,420

 

 

7,750,420

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

 

65,624,166

 

 

65,624,166

 

73,081,893

 

 

73,081,893

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(*) During the years 2017 and 2016 there has been a reversal of provisions amounting to Th$6,769,384 and Th$2,774,703, respectively, which resulted from fines demanded by the Brazilian Treasury on the use of IPI tax credits in the Free Zone of Manaus, because of favorable rulings on the subject for Rio de Janeiro Refrescos Ltda. from the Superior Chamber of Fiscal Resources (CSRF).